Search

Background: WHO has recommended that one dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine can be given to individuals aged 9-20 years to prevent HPV infection. Estimating durability of immune responses after a single dose in the target age for vaccination is important. We report immunogenicity results in Tanzanian girls up to 5 years after receiving a dose., Methods: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial (the Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study of Two HPV Vaccines in Tanzanian Girls [DoRIS] trial), 930 Tanzanian schoolgirls aged 9-14 years were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive one, two, or three doses of either the two-valent vaccine (Cervarix; GSK, Wavre, Belgium) or nine-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9; Merck Sharp & Dohme, Haarlem, Netherlands). Seropositivity specific to HPV16 or HPV18, antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and antibody avidity were measured annually up to month 36. Participants in the one-dose and two-dose groups were followed annually in a long-term extension of the DoRIS trial to month 60; the primary outcome was seropositivity specific to HPV16 or HPV18 comparing one dose with two doses., Findings: Single-dose seropositivity for HPV16 IgG antibodies at month 60 with either vaccine was more than 99% and non-inferior to two doses. 98% of girls in the one-dose two-valent vaccine group and 93% in the one-dose nine-valent group were seropositive for HPV18 at month 60; however, the non-inferiority criteria for HPV18 seropositivity comparing one dose with two doses were not met. Although HPV16 and HPV18 antibody GMCs after one dose were lower than those observed after two doses, antibody GMCs in the one-dose groups remained stable from month 12 to month 60. There was no evidence of a difference between the one-dose and two-dose groups in HPV16 or HPV18 antibody avidity at month 36 for either vaccine., Interpretation: A single dose of HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years continues to provide stable immune responses 5 years after vaccination, although ongoing surveillance for potential waning immunity after a single dose is needed. Participants are being followed up to 9 years after vaccination., Funding: UK Department of Health and Social Care, UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Global Challenges Research Fund, UK Medical Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust through the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DW-J reports grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and GSK Biologicals. KB reports grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Merck. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The first randomised controlled trial of single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine efficacy, the Kenya single-dose HPV-vaccine efficacy (KEN SHE) trial, showed greater than 97% efficacy against persistent HPV16 and HPV18 infection at 36 months among women in Kenya. We compared antibody responses after one dose of HPV vaccine in the Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study (DoRIS), the first randomised trial of the single- dose regimen in girls aged 9-14 years, the target age range for vaccination, with those after one dose of the same vaccine in KEN SHE., Methods: In the DoRIS trial, 930 girls aged 9-14 years in Tanzania were randomly assigned to one, two, or three doses of the 2-valent vaccine (Cervarix) or the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9). The proportion seroconverting and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at month 24 after one dose were compared with those in women aged 15-20 years who were randomly assigned to one dose of the same vaccines at the same timepoint in KEN SHE. Batched samples were tested together by virus-like particle ELISA for HPV16 and HPV18 IgG antibodies. Non-inferiority of GMC ratios (DoRIS trial:KEN SHE) was predefined as a lower bound of the 95% CI less than 0·50., Findings: Month 24 HPV16 and HPV18 antibody GMCs in DoRIS were similar or higher than those in KEN SHE. 2-valent GMC ratios were 0·90 (95% CI 0·72-1·14) for HPV16 and 1·02 (0·78-1·33) for HPV18. 9-valent GMC ratios were 1·44 (95% CI 1·14-1·82) and 1·47 (1·13-1·90), respectively. Non-inferiority of antibody GMCs and seropositivity was met for HPV16 and HPV18 for both vaccines., Interpretation: HPV16 and HPV18 immune responses in young girls 24 months after a single dose of 2-valent or 9-valent HPV vaccine were comparable to those in young women who were randomly assigned to a single dose of the same vaccines and in whom efficacy had been shown. A single dose of HPV vaccine, when given to girls in the target age range for vaccination, induces immune responses that could be effective against persistent HPV16 and HPV18 infection at least two years after vaccination., Funding: The UK Department of Health and Social Care, the Foreign, Commonwealth, & Development Office, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials scheme, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the US National Cancer Institute; the US National Institutes of Health, and the Francis and Dorothea Reed Endowed Chair in Infectious Diseases., Translation: For the KiSwahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KB reports grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation during the conduct of the DoRIS trial, and a grant and vaccine donations from Merck Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. DW-J reports grants from the Gates Foundation and the UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council during the DoRIS trial, and a grant and vaccine donations from Merck outside the submitted work. HW reports grants from the Gates Foundation and the UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council during the DoRIS trial, and vaccine donations from Merck outside the submitted work. JC reports grant support from the Gates Foundation and the UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council during the DoRIS trial. RJH reports a grant from the UK Research and Innovation Medical Research Council during the DoRIS trial. RVB reports grants from the Gates Foundation during the conduct of the KEN SHE trial, and data monitoring committee honorarium from Gilead Sciences and manuscript and abstract writing support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. NRM reports grant support from Merck Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. DAG reports grants from the Gates Foundation during the conduct of the KEN SHE trial, and grants and personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work. EAB reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership during the conduct of the KEN SHE trial; and personal fees from Gilead Sciences and personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are given as a two-dose schedule in children aged 9-14 years, or as three doses in older individuals. We compared antibody responses after one dose of HPV vaccine in the Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study (DoRIS), a randomised trial of different HPV vaccine schedules in Tanzania, to those from two observational HPV vaccine trials that found high efficacy of one dose up to 11 years against HPV16 and HPV18 (Costa Rica Vaccine Trial [CVT] and Institutional Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] India trial)., Methods: In this immunobridging analysis of an open-label randomised controlled trial, girls were recruited from 54 government schools in Mwanza, Tanzania, into the DoRIS trial. Girls were eligible if they were aged 9-14 years, healthy, and HIV negative. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1), using permutated block sizes of 12, 18, and 24, to one, two, or three doses of the 2-valent vaccine (Cervarix, GSK Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) or the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil 9, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France). For this immunobridging analysis, the primary objective was to compare geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at 24 months after one dose in the per-protocol population compared with in historical cohorts: the one-dose 2-valent vaccine group in DoRIS was compared with recipients of the 2-valent vaccine Cervarix from CVT and the one-dose 9-valent vaccine group in DoRIS was compared with recipients of the 4-valent vaccine Gardasil (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) from the IARC India trial. Samples were tested together with virus-like particle ELISA for HPV16 and HPV18 IgG antibodies. Non-inferiority of GMC ratios (DoRIS trial vs historical cohort) was predefined as when the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than 0·50. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02834637., Findings: Between Feb 23, 2017, and Jan 6, 2018, we screened 1002 girls for eligibility, of whom 930 were enrolled into DoRIS and 155 each were assigned to one dose, two doses, or three doses of 2-valent vaccine, or one dose, two doses, or three doses of 9-valent vaccine. 154 (99%) participants in the one-dose 2-valent vaccine group (median age 10 years [IQR 9-12]) and 152 (98%) in the one-dose 9-valent vaccine group (median age 10 years [IQR 9-12]) were vaccinated and attended the 24 month visit, and so were included in the analysis. 115 one-dose recipients from the CVT (median age 21 years [19-23]) and 139 one-dose recipients from the IARC India trial (median age 14 years [13-16]) were included in the analysis. At 24 months after vaccination, GMCs for HPV16 IgG antibodies were 22·9 international units (IU) per mL (95% CI 19·9-26·4; n=148) for the DoRIS 2-valent vaccine group versus 17·7 IU/mL (13·9-22·5; n=97) for the CVT (GMC ratio 1·30 [95% CI 1·00-1·68]) and 13·7 IU/mL (11·9-15·8; n=145) for the DoRIS 9-valent vaccine group versus 6·7 IU/mL (5·5-8·2; n=131) for the IARC India trial (GMC ratio 2·05 [1·61-2·61]). GMCs for HPV18 IgG antibodies were 9·9 IU/mL (95% CI 8·5-11·5: n=141) for the DoRIS 2-valent vaccine group versus 8·0 IU/mL (6·4-10·0; n=97) for the CVT trial (GMC ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·95-1·60]) and 5·7 IU/mL (4·9-6·8; n=136) for the DoRIS 9-valent vaccine group versus 2·2 IU/mL (1·9-2·7; n=129) for the IARC India trial (GMC ratio 2·12 [1·59-2·83]). Non-inferiority of antibody GMCs was met for each vaccine for both HPV16 and HPV18., Interpretation: One dose of HPV vaccine in young girls might provide sufficient protection against persistent HPV infection. A one-dose schedule would reduce costs, simplify vaccine delivery, and expand access to the vaccine., Funding: UK Department for International Development/UK Medical Research Council/Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the US National Cancer Institute., Translation: For the KiSwahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KB, HW, and DW-J report a grant from Merck for a new study of single-dose HPV vaccination in males in Tanzania, unrelated to this submitted work. PB, ARK, JTS, HW, and DW-J are members of the Single Dose HPV Vaccine Evaluation Consortium, coordinated by PATH and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. PB reports a grant from GSK Biologicals for a previous study on safety and immunogenicity of Cervarix in India unrelated to this submitted work during his previous position at Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India. DW-J reports a grant from GSK Biologicals in 2007 for a previous on safety and immunogenicity of Cervarix in Tanzania, unrelated to this submitted work. JTS reports that he was a named inventor on US Government-owned HPV vaccine patents that were licensed to GlaxoSmithKline and Merck and for which the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) previously received licensing fees. NCI's licenses have now expired but JTS was previously entitled to royalties to a specified amount, as determined by federal law governing technological transfer activities by US Government employees. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: An estimated 15% of girls aged 9-14 years worldwide have been vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) with the recommended two-dose or three-dose schedules. A one-dose HPV vaccine schedule would be simpler and cheaper to deliver. We report immunogenicity and safety results of different doses of two different HPV vaccines in Tanzanian girls., Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled healthy schoolgirls aged 9-14 years from Government schools in Mwanza, Tanzania. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive one, two, or three doses of either the 2-valent vaccine (Cervarix, GSK Biologicals, Rixensart) or the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon). The primary outcome was HPV 16 specific or HPV 18 specific seropositivity following one dose compared with two or three doses of the same HPV vaccine 24 months after vaccination. Safety was assessed as solicited adverse events up to 30 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 24 months after vaccination or to last study visit. The primary outcome was done in the per-protocol population, and safety was analysed in the total vaccinated population. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02834637., Findings: Between Feb 23, 2017, and Jan 6, 2018, we screened 1002 girls for eligibility. 72 girls were excluded. 930 girls were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive one dose of Cervarix (155 participants), two doses of Cervarix (155 participants), three doses of Cervarix (155 participants), one dose of Gardasil-9 (155 participants), two doses of Gardasil-9 (155 participants), or three doses of Gardasil-9 (155 participants). 922 participants received all scheduled doses within the defined window (three withdrew, one was lost to follow-up, and one died before completion; two received their 6-month doses early, and one received the wrong valent vaccine in error; all 930 participants were included in the total vaccinated cohort). Retention at 24 months was 918 (99%) of 930 participants. In the according-to-protocol cohort, at 24 months, 99% of participants who received one dose of either HPV vaccine were seropositive for HPV 16 IgG antibodies, compared with 100% of participants who received two doses, and 100% of participants who received three doses. This met the prespecified non-inferiority criteria. Anti-HPV 18 seropositivity at 24 months did not meet non-inferiority criteria for one dose compared to two doses or three doses for either vaccine, although more than 98% of girls in all groups had HPV 18 antibodies. 53 serious adverse events (SAEs) were experienced by 42 (4·5%) of 930 girls, the most common of which was hospital admission for malaria. One girl died of malaria. Number of events was similar between groups and no SAEs were considered related to vaccination., Interpretation: A single dose of the 2-valent or 9-valent HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years induced robust immune responses up to 24 months, suggesting that this reduced dose regimen could be suitable for prevention of HPV infection among girls in the target age group for vaccination., Funding: UK Department for International Development/UK Medical Research Council/Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the US National Cancer Institute., Translation: For the KiSwahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DW-J reports a grant from GSK Biologicals in 2007 for a previous study on safety and immunogenicity of Cervarix in Tanzania unrelated to this submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Standardisation of procedures for performing cellular functional assays across laboratories participating in multicentre clinical trials is key for generating comparable and reliable data., Objective: This article describes the performance of accredited laboratories in Africa and Europe on testing done in support of clinical trials., Methods: For enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) proficiency, characterised peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 48 HIV-negative blood donors in Johannesburg, South Africa, were sent to participating laboratories between February 2010 and February 2014. The PBMCs were tested for responses against cytomegalovirus, Epstein Barr and influenza peptide pools in a total of 1751 assays. In a separate study, a total of 1297 PBMC samples isolated from healthy HIV-negative participants in clinical trials of two prophylactic HIV vaccine candidates in Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and Zambia were analysed for cell viability, cell yield and cell recovery from frozen PBMCs., Results: Most (99%) of the 1751 ELISpot proficiency assays had data within acceptable ranges with low responses to mock stimuli. No significant statistical difference were observed in ELISpot responses at the five laboratories actively conducting immunological analyses. Of the 1297 clinical trial PBMCs processed, 94% had cell viability above 90% and 96% had cell yield above 0.7 million per mL of blood in freshly isolated cells. All parameters were within the predefined acceptance criteria., Conclusion: We demonstrate that multiple laboratories can generate reliable, accurate and comparable data by using standardised procedures, having regular training, having regular equipment maintenance and using centrally sourced reagents., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (© 2021. The Authors.)

We are developing a pan-clade HIV-1 T-cell vaccine HIVconsv, which could complement Env vaccines for prophylaxis and be a key to HIV cure. Our strategy focuses vaccine-elicited effector T-cells on functionally and structurally conserved regions (not full-length proteins and not only epitopes) of the HIV-1 proteome, which are common to most global variants and which, if mutated, cause a replicative fitness loss. Our first clinical trial in low risk HIV-1-negative adults in Oxford demonstrated the principle that naturally mostly subdominant epitopes, when taken out of the context of full-length proteins/virus and delivered by potent regimens involving combinations of simian adenovirus and poxvirus modified vaccinia virus Ankara, can induce robust CD8(+) T cells of broad specificities and functions capable of inhibiting in vitro HIV-1 replication. Here and for the first time, we tested this strategy in low risk HIV-1-negative adults in Africa. We showed that the vaccines were well tolerated and induced high frequencies of broadly HIVconsv-specific plurifunctional T cells, which inhibited in vitro viruses from four major clades A, B, C, and D. Because sub-Saharan Africa is globally the region most affected by HIV-1/AIDS, trial HIV-CORE 004 represents an important stage in the path toward efficacy evaluation of this highly rational and promising vaccine strategy.

The gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay is used routinely to evaluate the potency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine candidates and other vaccine candidates. In order to compare candidates and pool data from multiple trial laboratories, validated standardized methods must be applied across laboratories. Proficiency panels are a key part of a comprehensive quality assurance program to monitor inter- and intralaboratory performance, as well as assay performance, over time. Seven International AIDS Vaccine Initiative-sponsored trial sites participated in the proficiency panels described in this study. At each laboratory, two operators independently processed identical sample sets consisting of frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples from different donors by using four blind stimuli. PBMC recovery and viability after overnight resting and the IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay performance were assessed. All sites demonstrated good performance in PBMC thawing and resting, with a median recovery of 78% and median viability of 95%. The laboratories were able to detect similar antigen-specific T-cell responses, ranging from 50 to >3,000 spot-forming cells per million PBMC. An approximate range of a half log in results from operators within or across sites was seen in comparisons of antigen-specific responses. Consistently low background responses were seen in all laboratories. The results of these proficiency panels demonstrate the ability of seven laboratories, located across three continents, to process PBMC samples and to rank volunteers with differential magnitudes of IFN-gamma ELISPOT responses. These findings also illustrate the ability to standardize the IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay across multiple laboratories when common training methods, reagents such as fetal calf serum, and standard operating procedures are adopted. These results are encouraging for laboratories that are using cell-based immunology assays to test HIV vaccines and other vaccines.

The safety and immunogenicity of plasmid pTHr DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine candidates were evaluated in four Phase I clinical trials in Kenya and Uganda. Both vaccines, expressing HIV-1 subtype A gag p24/p17 and a string of CD8 T-cell epitopes (HIVA), were generally safe and well-tolerated. At the dosage levels and intervals tested, the percentage of vaccine recipients with HIV-1-specific cell-mediated immune responses, assessed by a validated ex vivo interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) ELISPOT assay and Cytokine Flow Cytometry (CFC), did not significantly differ from placebo recipients. These trials demonstrated the feasibility of conducting high-quality Phase 1 trials in Africa.