Search

Diagnostic assays for molecular alterations highly correlated with prognosis, predictive efficacy or safety of therapeutics are valuable clinical tools and in some cases approved as companion diagnostics (CDx) by the Federal Food and Drug Administration. For example, assays that determine echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation status have been approved as CDx assay for therapies that target this molecular alteration. Characterizing the parameters that may compromise diagnostic accuracy for molecular biomarkers is critical for optimal patient care. To investigate the impact of pre-analytical handling and processing of tumor tissue on commonly used diagnostic immunohistochemistry-based assays for ALK and mesenchymal epithelial transition protein [c-mesenchymal epithelial transition (c-MET)], we investigated the effects of cold ischemia, fixative type, fixation time, and cut-slide age on staining consistency and intensity using human lung xenograft tumor tissue. Cold ischemia times for up to 5 to 6 hours for c-MET or ALK, respectively had minimal impact on staining. The optimal fixation conditions for both assays were found to be at least 6 hours and up to 48 hours for c-MET or 72 hours for ALK, in 10% neutral buffered formalin and Zinc formalin. The ALK antigen demonstrated marked staining intensity differences across non-neutral buffered formalin fixative types and times. Finally, cut-slide age influenced assay performance for both ALK and c-MET, with maximum stability observed when cut slides were stored at ambient temperatures (30°C) for no longer than 3, and 5 months, respectively. This study highlights the potential for pre-analytical factors to confound diagnostic test result interpretation.

Introduction: The availability of high-quality, rigorously validated diagnostic tests that can be broadly implemented is necessary to efficiently identify patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC who can potentially benefit from treatment with crizotinib. Here we present data on the recently approved Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ), the only immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assay linked to treatment outcome., Methods: NSCLC specimens prospectively tested for anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) status by flourescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the PROFILE 1014 clinical trial of crizotinib versus chemotherapy (N = 1018, including 179 ALK-positive and 754 ALK-negative specimens) were evaluated using the ALK (D5F3) CDx assay. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival comparing crizotinib and chemotherapy for ALK IHC-positive patients and ALK FISH-positive patients, as well as for concordance with the enrollment ALK FISH assay, were determined., Results: Results from both assays were obtained for 933 cases. Percent positive, negative, and overall agreement rates were 86.0% , 96.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. There were 53 discrepant cases, of which 25 were ALK FISH-positive/ALK IHC-negative and 28 were ALK FISH-negative/ALK IHC-positive. The hazard ratios using observed outcomes were 0.401 for ALK FISH-positive/ALK IHC-positive cases and 0.407 for all ALK FISH-positive cases tested with ALK IHC versus 0.454 for all ALK FISH-positive cases enrolled in the trial. Outcome data for ALK FISH-negative/ALK IHC-positive cases were not available for analysis. Between-reader agreement rates for ALK IHC involving three independent laboratories exceeded 98%., Conclusions: The ALK (D5F3) CDx assay is a stand-alone companion diagnostic test for identification of patients for treatment with crizotinib. This automated assay provides an effective option to accurately and rapidly identify patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The simple binary scoring algorithm results in high reader-to-reader precision., (Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Companion diagnostics assay interpretation can select patients with the greatest targeted therapy benefits. We present the results from a prospective study demonstrating that pathologists can effectively learn immunohistochemical assay-interpretation skills from digital image-based electronic training (e-training). In this study, e-training was used to train board-certified pathologists to evaluate non-small cell lung carcinoma for eligibility for treatment with onartuzumab, a MET-inhibiting agent. The training program mimicked the live training that was previously validated in clinical trials for onartuzumab. A digital interface was developed for pathologists to review high-resolution, static images of stained slides. Sixty-four pathologists practicing in the United States enrolled while blinded to the type of training. After training, both groups completed a mandatory final test using glass slides. The results indicated both training modalities to be effective. Overall, 80.6% of e-trainees and 72.7% of live trainees achieved passing scores (at least 85%) on the final test. All study participants reported that their training experience was "good" and that they had received sufficient information to determine the adequacy of case slide staining to score each case. This study established that an e-training program conducted under highly controlled conditions can provide pathologists with the skills necessary to interpret a complex assay and that these skills can be equivalent to those achieved with face-to-face training using conventional microscopy. Programs of this type are scalable for global distribution and offer pathologists the potential for readily accessible and robust training in new companion diagnostic assays linked to novel, targeted, adjuvant therapies for cancer patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)