Search

With TV shows such as Hoarding buried alive, mainstream media depictions of hoarding disorder are presented mostly in the context of adults. Interestingly, however, studies have found that the onset of hoarding disorder often occurs in childhood between the ages of 8 and 10 (Morris et al., 2016). Since hoarding can onset at a young age, early intervention could help decrease the long‐term impairment of the disorder. According to the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders hoarding disorder is characterized as tending to collect items, difficulty in throwing items away despite the items' value or significance, and possessing an excessive number of items, leading to clutter (5th ed.; DSM–5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Despite a typical onset in childhood, most hoarding treatment and research has focused on adults because hoarding behaviors in youth can be challenging to identify due to family accommodation (Morris et al., 2016). In this article, we will review the prevalence of pediatric hoarding and provide a case example to describe clinical considerations for treating pediatric hoarding with exposure with response prevention (ERP). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study tested whether a new training tool, the Exposure Guide (EG), improved in-session therapist behaviors (i.e., indicators of quality) that have been associated with youth outcomes in prior clinical trials of exposure therapy. Six therapists at a community mental health agency (CMHA) provided exposure therapy for 8 youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Using a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design with random assignment to baseline lengths of 6 to 16 weeks, therapists received gold-standard exposure therapy training with weekly consultation (baseline phase) followed by addition of EG training and feedback (intervention phase). The primary outcome was therapist behavior during in-session exposures, observed weekly using a validated coding system. Therapist behavior was evaluated in relation to a priori benchmarks derived from clinical trials. Additional outcomes included training feasibility/acceptability, therapist response to case vignettes and beliefs about exposure, and independent evaluator-rated clinical outcomes. Three therapists reached behavior benchmarks only during the EG (intervention) phase. Two therapists met benchmarks during the baseline phase; one of these subsequently moved away from benchmarks but met them again after starting the EG phase. Across all therapists, the percentage of weeks meeting benchmarks was significantly higher during the EG phase (86.4%) vs. the baseline phase (53.2%). Youth participants experienced significant improvement in OCD symptoms and global illness severity from pre- to posttreatment. Results provide initial evidence that adding the EG to gold-standard training can change in-session therapist behaviors in a CMHA setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exposure‐based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is the gold standard of treatment for both anxiety disorders and Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder (OCD). During exposure therapy, patients gradually confront and closely attend to feared stimuli while resisting safety behaviors or compulsions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study tested whether a new training tool, the Exposure Guide (EG), improved in-session therapist behaviors that have been associated with youth outcomes in prior clinical trials of exposure therapy. Sixteen therapists in practice settings treated 46 youths with an anxiety disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Therapists were randomly assigned to receive "gold-standard" exposure therapy training with weekly consultation (GS) or "gold-standard" training with weekly consultation plus the EG (EG). The primary outcome was therapist behavior during in-session exposures, observed using a validated coding system. Secondary outcomes included training feasibility/acceptability and observer-rated patient fear habituation; we also explored independent evaluator-rated clinical outcome. As hypothesized, therapists used similarly high rates of exposure with patients in both groups, but those in the EG condition used more fear-increasing behaviors and fewer fear-decreasing behaviors compared with those in the GS condition. Attendance data and therapist feedback support EG feasibility and acceptability. Patients treated by EG-trained therapists showed increased rates of in-session habituation. Descriptive clinical outcome data showed a slightly higher treatment response rate in the EG group (66.7% EG, 58.8% GS) that was more pronounced among patients completing a posttreatment assessment (83.3% EG, 60.0% GS). Results confirm the effectiveness of EG training for improving therapist delivery behaviors. Future studies will be needed to determine whether EG training can improve rates of patient treatment response via improved delivery behaviors. Public Health Significance: This study shows that the Exposure Guide, a therapist training tool, improves therapist delivery of exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past several decades, there has been a focus on increasing access to evidence‐based practices (EBPs) for youth with psychological disorders. While many well‐tested and efficacious treatments exist, the dissemination and implementation of EBPs in community practice has been met with challenges at both the macro (e.g., systemic) and micro (e.g., therapist and client) levels. Emergent life events (ELEs) are one identified barrier found to decrease fidelity to EBPs in practice settings (Guan, Kim et al., 2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder is a chronic and impairing condition that often persists into adulthood. This review refreshes the state of support for psychosocial treatments and the predictors or moderators that relate to their efficacy and evaluates how the literature has improved since the last update in 2014. A secondary goal is to propose an additional framework for the categorization of studies based on central research questions rather than treatment format. Psychosocial treatment studies conducted since the last review are described and evaluated according to methodological rigor and evidence-based classification using the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology evidence-based treatment evaluation criteria. Findings again converge in support of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) as an effective and appropriate first-line treatment for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Family-focused CBT is now well-established. A number of other treatments including CBT+ D-Cycloserine, CBT+ Sertraline, CBT+ positive family interaction therapy, and technology-based CBT are now probably efficacious. Demographic, clinical, and family factors are consistent predictors of CBT outcome with conflicting findings for neurocognitive predictors. The field has advanced significantly since the last review, but there is still room for improvement. Some of the conclusions that can be drawn may be limited by our evaluation criteria. Future directions are proposed to advance treatment outcome research beyond a focus on which treatments work to exploring factors that account for how and why they work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In an effort to improve patient conceptualization and targeted treatment, researchers have sought to accurately classify OCD subtypes. To date, the most common form of OCD classification has used the content of symptom topography as opposed to functional links between symptoms to categorize OCD. The aim of the current study was to explore the associations between these two forms of OCD classification. Participant topographical symptoms were self-reported using the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Child Version (OCI-CV). Clinicians assessed whether participant symptoms were motivated by harm avoidance and/or incompleteness. Structural equation modeling was employed to explore the associations between harm avoidance and incompleteness and symptom dimensions in youth with OCD. Results showed that harm avoidance was significantly associated with doubting/checking, obsessing, and neutralizing symptoms, whereas incompleteness was associated with doubting/checking, ordering, and neutralizing symptoms. Findings are consistent with child and adult literature and highlight the importance of assessing the underlying function of OC behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This brief report examines the evidence for moderators of psychosocial treatment for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Understanding treatment moderators can help clinicians select the most appropriate intervention for a particular patient and consequently increase the likelihood of initial response. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify randomized trials and meta-analyses reporting on moderators of psychosocial treatment for pediatric OCD. All studies included a comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to active or control conditions. Few studies have evaluated moderators of psychosocial treatment for youth with OCD, and among those studies, few variables have demonstrated a differential effect on treatment response. Moderator analyses require large samples to garner the statistical power necessary to adequately evaluate differential responding in subgroups, and unfortunately, most reports of moderators in this review are post-hoc investigations of datasets from trials with relatively small sample sizes. Given the overwhelming number of CBT treatment variants and potential moderators, it would be impossible to conduct all the necessary head-to-head trials with sufficient sample sizes to develop helpful clinical guidelines. The best option for advancing the moderator literature is to utilize advanced statistical approaches for pooling existing data sets. Recommendations for leveraging emerging techniques in individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) are briefly discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mental health disorders are common and disabling for young people because of the potential to disrupt key developmental tasks. Implementation of evidence-based psychosocial therapies in New Zealand is limited, owing to the inaccessibility, length, and cost of training in these therapies. Furthermore, most therapies address one problem area at a time, although comorbidity and changing clinical needs commonly occur in practice. A more flexible approach is needed. The Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADTC) is designed to overcome these challenges; it provides a range of treatment modules addressing different problems, within a single training program. A clinical trial of MATCH-ADTC in the USA showed that MATCH-ADTC outperformed usual care and standard evidence-based treatment on several clinical measures. We aim to replicate these findings and evaluate the impact of providing training and supervision in MATCH-ADTC to: (1) improve clinical outcomes for youth attending mental health services; (2) increase the amount of evidence-based therapy content; (3) increase the efficiency of service delivery.Methods: This is an assessor-blinded multi-site effectiveness randomized controlled trial. Randomization occurs at two levels: (1) clinicians (≥60) are randomized to intervention or usual care; (2) youth participants (7-14 years old) accepted for treatment in child and adolescent mental health services (with a primary disorder that includes anxiety, depression, trauma-related symptoms, or disruptive behavior) are randomly allocated to receive MATCH-ADTC or usual care. Youth participants are recruited from 'mainstream', Māori-specific, and Pacific-specific child and adolescent mental health services. We originally planned to recruit 400 youth participants, but this has been revised to 200 participants. Centralized computer randomization ensures allocation concealment. The primary outcome measures are: (i) the difference in trajectory of change of clinical severity between groups (using the parent-rated Brief Problem Monitor); (ii) clinicians' use of evidence-based treatment procedures during therapy sessions; (iii) total time spent by clinicians delivering therapy.Discussion: If MATCH-ADTC demonstrates effectiveness it could offer a practical efficient method to increase access to evidence-based therapies, and improve outcomes for youth attending secondary care services.Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614000297628 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]