Search

Abstract After revelations of participation by psychiatrists and psychologists in interrogation of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay and Central Intelligence Agency secret detention centers, the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association adopted Position Statements absolutely prohibiting their members from participating in torture under any and all circumstances, and, to a limited degree, forbidding involvement in interrogations. Some interrogations utilize very aggressive techniques determined to be torture by many nations and organizations throughout the world. This paper explains why psychiatrists and psychologists involved in coercive interrogations violate the Geneva Conventions and the laws of the United States. Whether done with ignorance of professional ethical obligations or not, these psychiatrists and psychologists have crossed an ethical barrier that may best be averted from re-occurring by teaching medical students and residents in all medical specialties about the ethics principles stemming from the 1946–1947 Nuremberg trials and the Geneva Conventions, together with the Ethics Codes of the World Medical Association and the American Medical Association; and, with regard to psychiatric residents and psychological trainees, by the teaching about The Principles of Medical Ethics With Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry and the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, respectively. In this way, all physicians and psychologists will clearly understand that they have an absolute moral obligation to "First, do no harm" to the human beings they professionally encounter.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most common reason for hospital readmission following chemotherapy for AML and is a major driver of healthcare resource utilization. While FN risk models exist, these have largely been developed and validated in solid tumors. We therefore examined whether baseline characteristics could predict which AML patients with FN have a lower risk of progression to severe illness. We identified adults with high-grade myeloid neoplasm (³10% blasts in blood/marrow) who received intensive chemotherapy and were admitted for FN from 2016-2023. We collected baseline clinical and disease variables. Outcomes were: infections identified, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and survival. A "lower-risk [LR]" outcome was defined as LOS <72hrs without ICU admission or inpatient death. Univariate and multivariable (MV) logistic regression models were used to assess covariate associations with outcomes. We identified 397 FN admissions in 248 patients (median age 61 [range: 29-77] years). The median hospital LOS was 6 (range: 1-56) days; 10% required ICU admission and 3.5% died inpatient. Only 15% of admissions were LR. Infection was identified in 59% of admissions. Physiologic parameters including heart rate, blood pressure and fever height were the best predictors of LR admission and infection. We developed MV models to predict LR admission and infection with AUCs of 0.82 and AUC 0.72, respectively. Established FN and critical illness models were not predictive of outcomes in AML, where we could not identify a lower risk group; thus an AML-specific FN risk model requires further development and validation., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Prolonged hospitalization following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), while standard, is costly and resource intense, limits inpatient bed capacity, and negatively impacts quality of life. Early hospital discharge (EHD) following completion of chemotherapy has proven safe as an alternative at select institutions, but is not widely implemented., Patients and Methods: From February 2023 through May 2023, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey evaluating AML hospitalization patterns, care models, and barriers to EHD at its 33 member institutions., Results: A total of 30 (91%) institutions completed the survey; two-thirds treat >100 patients with AML annually and 45% treat more than half of these with intensive chemotherapy. In the (re)induction setting, 80% of institutions keep patients hospitalized until blood count recovery, whereas 20% aim to discharge patients after completion of chemotherapy if medically stable and logistically feasible. The predominant reasons for the perceived need for ongoing hospitalization were high risk of infection, treatment toxicities, and lack of nearby/accessible housing. There was no significant association between ability to practice EHD and annual AML volume or treatment intensity patterns (P=.60 and P=.11, respectively). In contrast, in the postremission setting, 87% of centers support patients following chemotherapy in the outpatient setting unless toxicities arise requiring readmission. Survey responses showed that 80% of centers were interested in exploring EHD after (re)induction but noted significant barriers, including accessible housing (71%), transportation (50%), high toxicity/infection rate (50%), high transfusion burden (50%), and limited bed availability for rehospitalization (50%)., Conclusions: Hospitalization and care patterns following intensive AML therapy vary widely across major US cancer institutions. Although only 20% of surveyed centers practice EHD following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy, 87% do so following postremission therapy. Given the interest in exploring the EHD approach given potential advantages of EHD for both patients and health care systems, strategies to address identified medical and logistical barriers should be explored.

Importance: Options for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma (B-ALL) are limited, and new approaches are needed. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has been combined with low-intensity chemotherapy, with modest improvements over historical controls, and dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH) treatment is safe and active for newly diagnosed ALL., Objective: To assess the safety and clinical activity of DA-EPOCH and InO in adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL., Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, phase 1 dose-escalation trial included adults with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-ALL and was conducted between September 2019 and November 2022. At least 5% blood or marrow blasts or measurable extramedullary disease (EMD) was required for enrollment., Interventions: DA-EPOCH was given on days 1 to 5, while InO was given on day 8 and day 15 of a 28-day cycle. Three dose levels were studied using a bayesian optimal interval design., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the maximum tolerated dose of InO when combined with DA-EPOCH, defined as the highest dose level that produced a rate of dose-limiting toxicity below 33%. Secondary objectives included response rates, survival estimates, and descriptions of toxic effects., Results: A total of 24 participants were screened and enrolled (median age, 46 [range, 28-76] years; 15 [62%] male). The median number of lines of prior therapy was 3 (range, 1-12). Three of 11 participants (27%) treated at the highest dose level (InO, 0.6 mg/m2, on day 8 and day 15) experienced dose-limiting toxicity, making this the maximum tolerated dose. No deaths occurred during the study, and only 1 patient (4%; 95% CI, 0.1%-21%) developed sinusoidal obstructive syndrome after poststudy allograft. The morphologic complete response rate was 84% (95% CI, 60%-97%), 88% (95% CI, 62%-98%) of which was measurable residual disease negative by flow cytometry. Five of 6 participants with EMD experienced treatment response. The overall response rate was 83% (95% CI, 63%-95%). Median overall survival, duration of response, and event-free survival were 17.0 (95% CI, 8.4-not reached), 15.0 (95% CI, 6.7-not reached), and 9.6 (95% CI, 4.5-not reached) months, respectively., Conclusions: In this study, adding InO to DA-EPOCH in adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL was feasible, with high response rates and sinusoidal obstructive syndrome occurring rarely in a heavily pretreated population. Many patients were able to proceed to poststudy consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Further investigation of this combination is warranted., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03991884.

Outcomes for adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) high-grade myeloid neoplasms remain poor, with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) the sole therapy likely to result in cure. We conducted the present study to determine the feasibility of early HCT-within 60 days of beginning reinduction chemotherapy-to see whether getting patients to HCT in an expeditious manner would expand the number of patients being offered this curative option. In this proof-of-principle feasibility study, we included adults age 18 to 75 years with R/R myeloid malignancies with ≥10% blood/marrow blasts at diagnosis who were eligible for a reduced-intensity HCT. Subjects received reinduction chemotherapy with cladribine, cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and filgrastim (CLAG-M) and proceeded to HCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (fludarabine/ melphalan). We enrolled 30 subjects, all of whom received CLAG-M reinduction, although only 9 underwent HCT within 60 days (<15, the predetermined threshold for feasibility "success"), with a median time to HCT of 48 days (range, 42 to 60 days). Eleven additional subjects received HCT beyond the target 60 days (off-study), with a median time to transplantation of 83 days (range, 53 to 367 days). Barriers to early HCT included infection, physician preference, lack of an HLA-matched donor, logistical delays, and disease progression, all of which may limit the real-world uptake of such early-to-transplantation protocols., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We recently performed a single-arm phase II trial of DA-EPOCH in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We sought to compare these results to those with standard Hyper-CVAD., Methods: We created a retrospective matched cohort of patients who received Hyper-CVAD (n = 69) at our center and otherwise met eligibility criteria for the DA-EPOCH trial (n = 53)., Results: Our outcomes support the use of Hyper-CVAD over DA-EPOCH in Ph- disease for both overall survival (OS; HR 0.18, p = .004) and event-free survival (EFS; HR 0.51, p = .06). In contrast, outcomes were similar in Ph+ disease (OS HR 0.97, p = .96; EFS HR 0.65, p = .21). Rates of morphologic remission and measurable residual-disease negativity were similar between the regimens. Hyper-CVAD was associated with significantly more febrile neutropenia (OR 1.9, p = .03) and a greater incidence of Grade 4 or 5 adverse events (20% vs. 6%). Average transfusions per cycle of both red blood cells (p < .001) and platelets (p < .001) were five-fold higher with Hyper-CVAD., Conclusions: Our findings support continued use of Hyper-CVAD for Ph- ALL but suggest that DA-EPOCH may be a reasonable alternative for Ph+ ALL. These data also highlight a potential role for DA-EPOCH in resource-limited settings or when more intense therapy is not feasible., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib improves event-free survival (EFS) when used with 7 + 3 in adults with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), irrespective of the FLT3-mutation status. Here, we evaluated adding sorafenib to cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) in a phase 1/2 trial of 81 adults aged ≤60 years with newly diagnosed AML. Forty-six patients were treated in phase 1 with escalating doses of sorafenib and mitoxantrone. No maximum tolerated dose was reached, and a regimen including mitoxantrone 18 mg/m2 per day and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was declared the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Among 41 patients treated at RP2D, a measurable residual disease-negative complete remission (MRD- CR) rate of 83% was obtained. Four-week mortality was 2%. One-year overall survival (OS) and EFS were 80% and 76%, without differences in MRD- CR rates, OS, or EFS between patients with or without FLT3-mutated disease. Comparing outcomes using CLAG-M/sorafenib with those of a matched cohort of 76 patients treated with CLAG-M alone, multivariable-adjusted survival estimates were improved for 41 patients receiving CLAG-M/sorafenib at RP2D (OS: hazard ratio,0.24 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.82]; P = .023; EFS: hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.53]; P = .003). Benefit was limited to patients with intermediate-risk disease (univariate analysis: P = .01 for OS; P = .02 for EFS). These data suggest that CLAG-M/sorafenib is safe and improves OS and EFS relative to CLAG-M alone, with benefits primarily in patients with intermediate-risk disease. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02728050., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Treatments for adults with newly-diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be prohibitively toxic and/or resource-intense. To address this, we performed a phase II study of dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH). Imatinib or dasatinib was added for Ph + disease; rituximab was added when CD20+. Fifty-three patients were evaluable: 28 with Ph + disease, and 25 with Ph-. All patients had ≥1 high-risk clinical feature. Measurable residual disease-negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry within 4 cycles was achieved in 71% in patients with Ph + ALL and 64% in Ph - ALL. Median overall survival (OS) was 49 months, with a 2-year OS of 71%. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) in the 47 patients that attained morphologic remission was 24 months, with a 2-year RFS of 57%. Early mortality was 2%. In summary, DA-EPOCH yields deep and durable remissions in adults with ALL comparable to some resource-intense strategies but with a low rate of treatment-related death.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have failed hypomethylating agents (HMA) have a poor prognosis. We examined whether high intensity induction chemotherapy could abrogate negative outcomes in 270 patients with AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. Prior HMA therapy was significantly associated with a lower overall survival (OS) as compared to a reference group of patients with secondary disease without prior HMA therapy (median 7.2 vs 13.1 months). In patients with prior HMA therapy, high intensity induction was associated with a non-significant trend toward longer OS (median 8.2 vs 4.8 months) and decreased rates of treatment failure (39% vs 64%). These results redemonstrate poor outcomes in patients with prior HMA and suggest possible benefit of high intensity induction that should be evaluated in future studies.

Contemporary data on infections after intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are scarce. Cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone ("CLAG-M") may result in higher remission rates than standard-dose cytarabine plus anthracycline ("7 + 3") but may result in more infections. We compared moderate to severe infections occurring up to 90 days after the first induction cycle for AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms in patients receiving CLAG-M for newly diagnosed (n = 196) or relapsed/refractory disease (n = 131) or 7 + 3 for newly diagnosed disease (n = 115). For newly diagnosed disease, microbiologically documented infections were more frequent after CLAG-M compared to 7 + 3 (adjusted rate ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.06-2.58]; P = 0.03), with a cumulative incidence of 27.8% and 16.5% by day 90, respectively. Patients receiving CLAG-M for relapsed/refractory disease had the highest cumulative incidence of 50.7%. Bacterial bloodstream infections were the most frequent followed by respiratory tract infections. Among 29 patients (7%) who died, infection was a primary or contributing cause of death in 59%. These data indicate that infections continue to cause substantial morbidity in patients treated for AML, especially those treated for relapsed/refractory disease, and are more common with newer, more myelosuppressive regimens such as CLAG-M. Improved strategies for infection prevention are needed., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) improves outcomes when added to intensive AML chemotherapy. A meta-analysis suggested the greatest benefit when combining fractionated doses of GO (GO3) with 7 + 3. To test whether GO3 can be safely used with high intensity chemotherapy, we conducted a phase 1/2 study of cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) in adults with newly diagnosed AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasm (NCT03531918). Sixty-six patients with a median age of 65 (range: 19-80) years were enrolled. Cohorts of six and twelve patients were treated in phase 1 with one dose of GO or three doses of GO (GO3) at 3 mg/m 2 per dose. Since a maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was declared to be GO3. At RP2D, 52/60 (87%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 45/52 (87%) without flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD). Eight-week mortality was 0%. Six- and twelve-month event-free survival (EFS) were 73% and 58%; among favorable-risk patients, these estimates were 100% and 95%. Compared to 186 medically matched adults treated with CLAG-M alone, CLAG-M/GO3 was associated with better survival in patients with favorable-risk disease (EFS: p = 0.007; OS: p = 0.030). These data indicate that CLAG-M/GO3 is safe and leads to superior outcomes than CLAG-M alone in favorable-risk AML/high-grade myeloid neoplasm.

Background: Potential involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by acute lymphoblastic leukemia is typically evaluated by a conventional cytospin (CC) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is generally more sensitive and specific than morphology, but data to guide its use versus CC are limited., Methods: This study identified 92 patients who had MFC performed on their initial CSF specimen and received at least 4 cycles of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine (hyperCVAD) as their initial treatment., Results: Eighteen (20%) were CSF+ by MFC at the baseline, and only 6 of these patients were positive by CC. In contrast, 0 of 51 patients who were negative by MFC and had CC available were positive by CC. Despite the receipt of significantly more intra-CSF chemotherapy (P < .001), the cumulative incidence of CNS relapse by MFC was 22% among CSF+ patients versus 5% among those who were CSF- (P = .044). No such association was observed between CNS relapse and CC results (P = .42). None of the 74 CSF- patients became CSF+ during their initial treatment despite being tested a median of 5 times (range, 2-10). CSF positivity by MFC was the factor most strongly associated with CNS relapse in a series of univariate Cox models (hazard ratio, 3.7; P = .067). The initial CSF status by MFC had no significant impact on overall or event-free survival., Conclusions: MFC of CSF is superior to CC of CSF in identifying adults at high risk for CNS relapse after treatment with hyperCVAD. Surveillance of CSF by MFC has limited utility., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

We recently reported an early hospital discharge (EHD) care strategy following intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like chemotherapy is safe. To evaluate its impact on infectious outcomes, we compared all adults treated from 8/1/2014 to 7/31/2018 discharging within 72 h of completing chemotherapy (EHD) with hospitalized patients (controls) across 354 induction and 259 post-remission cycles. While overall outcomes were similar, gram-positive bacteremias were more common in EHD patients than control ( p <.001), although they received fewer days of IV antimicrobials ( p < .001). Notably, cumulative infection risks in EHD patients were similar after induction and post-remission therapy. In multivariable analysis, only EHD status was independently associated with risk for gram-positive bacteremia ( p = .01), whereas the only independent risk factor for fungal infection was fluconazole ( vs. posaconazole) use ( p < .001). The observation of increased rates of gram-positive bacteremias with EHD identifies improvements in catheter management as one area to further increase the safety of this care approach.

Few patients with cancer, including those with acute myeloid leukemia and high-grade myeloid neoplasms, participate in clinical trials. Broadening standard eligibility criteria may increase clinical trial participation. In this retrospective single-center analysis, we identified 442 consecutive newly diagnosed patients from 2014 to 2016. Patients were considered eligible if they had performance status 0-2, normal renal and hepatic function, no recent solid tumor, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50%, and no history of congestive heart failure (CHF) or myocardial infarction (MI); ineligible patients failed to meet one or more of these criteria. We included 372 patients who received chemotherapy. Ineligible patients represented 40% of the population and had a 1-79-fold greater risk of death (95% CI 1.37, 2.33) than eligible patients. Very few patients had cardiac co-morbidities, including 2% with low EF, 4% with prior CHF, and 5% with prior MI. In multivariable analysis, ineligibility was associated with decreased survival [HR 1-44 (95% CI 1-07, 1-93)]. Allogeneic transplantation, performed in 150 patients (40%), was associated with improved survival [HR 0-66, 95% CI (0-48, 0-91)]. Therefore, standard eligibility characteristics identify a patient population with improved survival. Further treatment options are needed for patients considered ineligible for clinical trials.

Background: Early hospital discharge (EHD) after intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induction chemotherapy has become routine at the University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance over the past several years. We assessed the financial implications of EHD over the first 4 years after its broad adoption for patients with AML and other high-grade myeloid neoplasms undergoing AML-like induction chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively compared charges between 189 patients with EHD who received all postinduction inpatient/outpatient care within our care system between August 2014 and July 2018 and 139 medically matched control patients who remained hospitalized for logistical reasons. Charges from the day of initial discharge (patients with EHD) or end of chemotherapy (control patients) until blood count recovery, additional chemotherapy or care transition, hospital discharge (for control patients only), an elapse of 42 days, or death were extracted from financial databases and separated into categories: facility/provider, emergency department, transfusions, laboratory, imaging, pharmacy, and miscellaneous., Results: Combined charges averaged $4,157/day (range, $905-$13,119/day) for patients with EHD versus $9,248/day (range, $4,363-$48,522/day) for control patients (P<.001). The EHD cohort had lower mean facility/provider, transfusion, laboratory, and pharmacy charges but not imaging or miscellaneous charges. During readmissions, there was no statistically significant difference in daily inpatient charges between the EHD and control cohorts. After multivariable adjustment, average charges were $3,837/day lower for patients with EHD (P<.001)., Conclusions: Together with previous data from our center showing that EHD is safe and associated with reduced healthcare resource utilization, this study further supports this care approach for AML and other high-grade myeloid neoplasms if infrastructure is available to enable close outpatient follow-up.

Purpose: With increasing therapeutic alternatives available, there is growing interest in tools that accurately identify patients most suitable for intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy. Nowadays, conceptual criteria proposed by an Italian panel of experts are widely used for this purpose. How accurately these Ferrara criteria predict fitness for intensive chemotherapy is unknown., Patients and Methods: We assessed the fitness of adults undergoing intensive AML therapy based on Ferrara criteria and determined the accuracy of this assessment for early mortality and survival prediction., Results: Among 655 adults who received curative-intent induction or reinduction chemotherapy with 7 days of standard-dose cytarabine and 3 days of an anthracycline ("7+3") CLAG-M (cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and mitoxantrone), or reduced-dose CLAG-M, 197 (30%) met at least one of the criteria defining unfitness for intensive chemotherapy (F-unfit). Compared with F-fit patients, the overall survival of F-unfit patients was significantly shorter (median, 4.8 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.5 months v 36.8 months; 95% CI, 27.4 to 73.0 months; P < .001). When used alone, the Ferrara unfitness assessment was more accurate in predicting day 28 and day 100 mortality than the treatment-related mortality score we developed previously (used binary, ≤ 13.1 v > 13.1), as indicated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.76 and 0.79 versus 0.66 and 0.62. The predictive accuracy of the Ferrara unfitness assessment could be significantly improved by including additional covariates such as performance status and albumin, yielding AUCs as high as 0.84-0.85 for the prediction of day 28 or day 100 mortality. Prediction of overall survival was less accurate, yielding a c-statistic value as high as 0.75 in multivariable models., Conclusion: Ferrara unfitness criteria provide a good prediction tool for shorter-term mortality after intensive AML chemotherapy. Our data may serve as a benchmark for expected outcomes with intensive chemotherapy in F-fit and F-unfit patients.

Consistent with observations in other disease settings, retrospective studies have indicated that treatment outcomes for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are better in higher- vs lower-volume hospitals and academic vs nonacademic centers, with greatest benefits noted in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Younger age, more frequent receipt of chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation, and differences in comorbidities and socioeconomic factors may partially account for these differences. With new therapeutic options including oral small molecule inhibitors and parenteral drugs suitable for outpatient administration, there is increasing interest from patients and physicians in treating AML in the community setting and avoiding referral to academic centers. This may be particularly true for older adults, for whom treatment rates in the community have historically been low, and for those with comorbidities, because treatment benefits are estimated to be low, and thus travel to academic centers is perceived as especially burdensome. How the volume-outcome relationship is affected by the shift of the treatment landscape in AML over the last few years is unknown. Additionally, improvements in supportive care (transfusion support, broad-spectrum oral antimicrobials), resulting in gradually decreasing early death rates over time, and the growing focus on the impact of AML therapy on quality of life and treatment cost concerns further fuel the larger trend toward an increasing proportion of care delivered in the outpatient setting. Here, we examine whether the current shift of administering chemotherapy and supportive care to the outpatient setting can be translated to the community setting without compromising patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict-of interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

In January 2020, the first documented patient in the United States infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was diagnosed in Washington State. Since that time, community spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the state has changed the practice of oncologic care at our comprehensive cancer center in Seattle. At the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, the primary oncology clinic for the University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Consortium, our specialists who manage adult patients with hematologic malignancies have rapidly adjusted clinical practices to mitigate the potential risks of COVID-19 to our patients. We suggest that our general management decisions and modifications in Seattle are broadly applicable to patients with hematologic malignancies. Despite a rapidly changing environment that necessitates opinion-based care, we provide recommendations that are based on best available data from clinical trials and collective knowledge of disease states.

There is currently no validated quality of life (QOL) instrument specific to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A previous cross-sectional interview-based study elicited concepts for inclusion in a novel QOL instrument. Here, we further develop and validate this new instrument, the AML-QOL. Iterative revisions of the draft AML-QOL were refined based on feedback from 16 patients, 8 medical providers, and 3 psychometricians. The instrument underwent factor analysis based on responses from 202 patients with AML and analogous aggressive myeloid neoplasms receiving AML-like therapy. A prospective validation study was then undertaken in 50 patients who completed the AML-QOL at multiple time points while undergoing a cycle of intensive chemotherapy to establish test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change. The final AML-QOL contains 27 items and is categorized into 5 domains (Physical, Social, Cognitive, Anxiety, Depression), one Symptom Index, a single item assessing overall quality of life, and a Summary Score. The AML-QOL domains show high internal consistency (median alpha: 0.85), good test-retest reliability (median interclass correlation: 0.82), and had convergent and divergent validity when compared to a non-disease-specific instrument (the EORTC QLQ-C30). The Summary Score demonstrated good sensitivity to change when anchored to patient perception of QOL change. The AML-QOL is a reliable and valid measure of QOL in patients with AML and analogous aggressive myeloid neoplasms. A clinically meaningful difference is 8-10 points out of 100 on the Summary Score.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic malignancies with variable clinical and molecular features. We analyzed long-term results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with CMML and determined clinical and molecular risk factors associated with outcomes. Data from 129 patients, aged 7-74 (median 55) years, at various stages of the disease and transplanted from related or unrelated donors were analyzed. Using a panel of 75 genes somatic mutations present before hematopoietic cell transplantation were identified In 52 patients. The progression-free survival rate at 10 years was 29%. The major cause of death was relapse (32%), which was significantly associated with adverse cytogenetics (hazard ratio, 3.77; P =0.0002), CMML Prognostic Scoring System (hazard ratio, 14.3, P =0.01), and MD Anderson prognostic scores (hazard ratio, 9.4; P =0.005). Mortality was associated with high-risk cytogenetics (hazard ratio, 1.88; P =0.01) and high Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (score ≥4: hazard ratio, 1.99; P =0.01). High overall mutation burden (≥10 mutations: hazard ratio, 3.4; P =0.02), and ≥4 mutated epigenetic regulatory genes (hazard ratio 5.4; P =0.003) were linked to relapse. Unsupervised clustering of the correlation matrix revealed distinct high-risk groups with unique associations of mutations and clinical features. CMML with a high mutation burden appeared to be distinct from high-risk groups defined by complex cytogenetics. New transplant strategies must be developed to target specific disease subgroups, stratified by molecular profiling and clinical risk factors., (Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy are at increased risk of developing therapy-related (t-) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). It is unclear whether antecedent CLL adds prognostic value to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) for MDS. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of a previous CLL diagnosis as an independent adverse prognostic factor., Patients and Methods: We identified 18 consecutive patients with t-MDS, previously treated for CLL (CLL-MDS) from 2002 to 2016. For each CLL-MDS patient, we identified 2 control patients with de novo MDS matched for age (≤ 65 or > 65 years), IPSS-R (≤ 3 or > 3), and year of MDS diagnosis (before or after 2008). Multivariable models were developed to test for independent predictors of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Median time from CLL to MDS diagnosis was 58.8 months (range, 12-280 months) and median number of treatment lines for CLL was 1 (range, 1-5), including alkylating agents in 15 patients (83%) and fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab in 12 patients (67%). Hypomethylating agents were administered in 13 (72%) of CLL-MDS patients and 33 (91%) of de novo MDS patients. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, OS was not different between CLL-MDS and matched de novo MDS patients. CLL-MDS patients with IPSS-R score ≤ 3 had better OS compared with those with IPSS-R score > 3. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant independent association between history of CLL OS or progression to AML., Conclusion: History of CLL did not independently affect OS in t-MDS patients beyond IPSS-R score., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (RR) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, ≥10% blasts) often receive intensive chemotherapy at diagnosis and relapse. We retrospectively identified 365 patients and categorized the reasons for receiving treatment off study (medical, logistical, or unclear). The pretreatment characteristics of the on and off study groups were similar. Rates of the complete remission (CR) without measurable residual disease were significantly higher for ND patients treated on versus off study (61% versus 35%), but CR rates and survival were low for all RR patients regardless of study assignment. The subset of ND patients treated off study for medical reasons had significantly decreased overall survival and relapse-free survival. Standard, stringent study eligibility criteria may delineate a population of ND, but not RR, patients with improved outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy.

Purpose of Review: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are almost invariably kept in the hospital until resolution of cytopenias following intensive induction chemotherapy. This care approach is costly and may further contribute to the reduced qualify of life of these patients. This has raised interest in moving at least part of this care to the outpatient setting. Reimbursement challenges for inpatient administration of some of the new drugs approved for AML in the last 2 years adds to this interest., Recent Findings: Retrospective and smaller prospective studies have shown that outpatient management following intensive induction chemotherapy ('Early Hospital Discharge') is feasible and may be well tolerated and cost-effective. Reported experience is more limited regarding administration of intensive chemotherapy in the outpatient setting., Summary: Although of interest, barriers to the successful implementation of outpatient care models, such as limited outpatient infrastructure or geographical limitations, will have to be overcome in many cancer centers. Importantly, before wide-spread introduction, the safety and 'efficacy' (e.g. reduction in medical resources and/or cost and improvement in quality of life) of outpatient care strategies will need to be further evaluated in a prospective - and ideally randomized - manner across more heterogeneous types of oncology and geographical settings.

Outcomes with "7 + 3" are often unsatisfactory in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Trials demonstrating improved outcomes with high-dose cytarabine, addition of cladribine, or escalated anthracycline doses prompted a phase 1/2 study (NCT02044796) of G-CSF, cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone (GCLAM) in adults with newly-diagnosed AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. One hundred and twenty-one patients, median age 60 (range 21-81) years, were enrolled. In phase 1, cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 12-18 mg/m 2 /day of mitoxantrone as part of GCLAM. Because all dose levels were well-tolerated, mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m 2 was declared the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). 74/94 (79%) patients treated at the RP2D achieved a complete remission (CR; 67/74 without measureable residual disease [MRD]) for an overall MRD neg CR rate of 71% (primary phase 2 endpoint). Seven patients achieved a CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi; 7%, 5 MRD neg ) for a CR/CRi rate of 81/94 (86%). Four-week mortality was 2%. After adjustment, the MRD neg CR and CR/CRi rates compared favorably to 100 matched controls treated with 7 + 3 at our center and 245 matched patients treated with 7 + 3 on a cooperative group trial. Our data indicate GCLAM with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m 2 /day is safe and induces high-quality remissions in adults with newly-diagnosed AML.

Aim: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematopoietic clonal disorder characterized by the increased blasts and poor survival outcome, which is mainly driven by cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Here, we investigated the prognostic impact of other demographic parameters on the survival outcomes in AML patients. Method: We reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database to collect demographic information, including age, diagnosis, gender, race, and geographic region in patients with non-acute promyelocytic leukemia AML, between 2004-2008. The primary end-point of our study was 3-year overall survival (OS), which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Results: A total of 13,282 patients were included in our analyses. Increasing age (HR 1.2, p  < .0001), male gender (HR 1.05, p  = .01), and geographic region of Midwest (HR 1.07, p  = .002) were associated with inferior 3-year OS in univariate analysis, and these parameters remained independent prognostic factors in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: AML is a heterogeneous myeloid neoplasm with patient outcomes largely dictated by the cytogenetics and somatic mutations. In our study, additional demographic factors, including advanced age, male gender, and geographic region of AML diagnosis were associated with OS outcome in non-APL AML patients.

DNA methyltransferase inhibitors sensitize leukemia cells to chemotherapeutics. We therefore conducted a phase 1/2 study of mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine following 'priming' with 5-10 days of decitabine (dec/MEC) in 52 adults (median age 55 (range: 19-72) years) with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. During dose escalation in cohorts of 6-12 patients, all dose levels were well tolerated. As response rates appeared similar with 7 and 10 days of decitabine, a 7-day course was defined as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Among 46 patients treated at/above the RP2D, 10 (22%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 8 without measurable residual disease; five additional patients achieved CR with incomplete platelet recovery, for an overall response rate of 33%. Seven patients (15%) died within 28 days of treatment initiation. Infection/neutropenic fever, nausea and mucositis were the most common adverse events. While the CR rate compared favorably to a matched historic control population (observed/expected CR ratio=1.77), CR rate and survival were similar to two contemporary salvage regimens used at our institution (G-CLAC (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF); clofarabine; cytarabine) and G-CLAM (G-CSF; cladribine; cytarabine; mitoxantrone)). Thus, while meeting the prespecified efficacy goal, we found no evidence that dec/MEC is substantially better than other cytarabine-based regimens currently used for relapsed/refractory AML.

Importance: Adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) commonly require support in the intensive care unit (ICU), but risk factors for admission to the ICU and adverse outcomes remain poorly defined., Objective: To examine risk factors, mortality, length of stay, and cost associated with admission to the ICU for patients with AML., Design, Setting, and Participants: This study extracted information from the University HealthSystem Consortium database on patients 18 years or older with AML who were hospitalized for any cause between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012. The University HealthSystem Consortium database contains demographic, clinical, and cost variables prospectively abstracted by certified coders from discharge summaries. Outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariable statistical techniques. Data analysis was performed from November 15, 2013, to August 15, 2016., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were admission to the ICU and inpatient mortality among patients requiring ICU care. Secondary outcomes included length of stay in the ICU, total hospitalization length of stay, and cost., Results: Of the 43 249 patients with AML (mean [SD] age, 59.5 [16.6] years; 23 939 men and 19 310 women), 11 277 (26.1%) were admitted to the ICU. On multivariable analysis (with results reported as odds ratios [95% CIs]), independent risk factors for admission to the ICU included age younger than 80 years (1.56 [1.42-1.70]), hospitalization in the South (1.81 [1.71-1.92]), hospitalization at a low- or medium-volume hospital (1.25 [1.19-1.31]), number of comorbidities (10.64 [8.89-12.62] for 5 vs none), sepsis (4.61 [4.34-4.89]), invasive fungal infection (1.24 [1.11-1.39]), and pneumonia (1.73 [1.63-1.82]). In-hospital mortality was higher for patients requiring ICU care (4857 of 11 277 [43.1%] vs 2959 of 31 972 [9.3%]). On multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for death in patients requiring ICU care included age 60 years or older (1.16 [1.06-1.26]), nonwhite race/ethnicity (1.18 [1.07-1.30]), hospitalization on the West coast (1.19 [1.06-1.34]), number of comorbidities (18.76 [13.7-25.67] for 5 vs none), sepsis (2.94 [2.70-3.21]), invasive fungal infection (1.20 [1.02-1.42]), and pneumonia (1.13 [1.04-1.24]). Mean costs of hospitalization were higher for patients requiring ICU care ($83 354 vs $41 973) and increased with each comorbidity, from $50 543 for patients with no comorbidities to $124 820 for those with 5 or more comorbidities., Conclusions and Relevance: Admission to the ICU is associated with high mortality and cost that increase proportionally with the comorbidity burden in adults with AML. Several demographic factors and medical characteristics identify patients at risk for admission to the ICU and mortality and provide an opportunity for testing primary prevention strategies.

Measurable ('minimal') residual disease (MRD) before or after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) identifies adults with AML at risk of poor outcomes. Here, we studied whether peri-transplant MRD dynamics can refine risk assessment. We analyzed 279 adults receiving myeloablative allogeneic HCT in first or second remission who survived at least 35 days and underwent 10-color multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) analyses of marrow aspirates before and 28±7 days after transplantation. MFC-detectable MRD before (n=63) or after (n=16) transplantation identified patients with high relapse risk and poor survival. Forty-nine patients cleared MRD with HCT conditioning, whereas two patients developed new evidence of disease. The 214 MRD(neg)/MRD(neg) patients had excellent outcomes, whereas both MRD(neg)/MRD(pos) patients died within 100 days following transplantation. For patients with pre-HCT MRD, outcomes were poor regardless of post-HCT MRD status, although survival beyond 3 years was only observed among the 58 patients with decreasing but not the seven patients with increasing peri-HCT MRD levels. In multivariable models, pre-HCT but not post-HCT MRD was independently associated with overall survival and risk of relapse. These data indicate that MRD(pos) patients before transplantation have a high relapse risk regardless of whether or not they clear MFC-detectable disease with conditioning and should be considered for pre-emptive therapeutic strategies.

Purpose: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are in morphologic complete remission are typically considered separately from patients with active disease (ie, ≥ 5% marrow blasts by morphology) in treatment algorithms for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which implies distinct outcomes for these two groups. It is well recognized that the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplantation is associated with adverse post-HCT outcome for those patients in morphologic remission. This effect of pre-HCT MRD prompted us to compare outcomes in consecutive patients in MRD-positive remission with patients with active AML who underwent myeloablative allogeneic HCT at our institution., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively studied 359 consecutive adults with AML who underwent myeloablative allogeneic HCT from a peripheral blood or bone marrow donor between 2006 and 2014. Pre-HCT disease staging included 10-color multiparametric flow cytometry on bone marrow aspirates in all patients. Any level of residual disease was considered to be MRD positive., Results: Three-year relapse estimates were 67% in 76 patients in MRD-positive morphologic remission and 65% in 48 patients with active AML compared with 22% in 235 patients in MRD-negative remission. Three-year overall survival estimates were 26%, 23%, and 73% in these three groups, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, MRD-negative remission status remained statistically significantly associated with longer overall and progression-free survival as well as lower risk of relapse compared with MRD-positive morphologic remission status or having active disease, with similar outcomes between the latter two groups., Conclusion: The similarities in outcomes between patients in MRD-positive morphologic remission and those with active disease at the time of HCT support the use of treatment algorithms that use MRD- rather than morphology-based disease assessments., Competing Interests: Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Single agent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have demonstrated reproducible response rates of 5-15% in treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN). The subset of patients that benefits most from these agents remains unknown. We reviewed individual patient data from five clinical trials of erlotinib, lapatinib, or gefitinib to determine if there are clinical characteristics that are associated with clinical benefit defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) >4months. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and nineteen subjects were included. Observed responses were: 1% CR, 6% PR, 24% SD >4months, 18% SD <4months, 45% progressive disease (PD), 7% not evaluable (NE). The median OS was 6.4months and the median PFS was 2.7months. The most common toxicities observed were rash (grade 1 in 37%, grade 2 in 33%, grade 3+ in 6%) and diarrhea (grade 1 in 30%, grade 2 in 10%, grade 3+ in 5%). Performance status (PS) (p=0.04), older age (p=0.02), and development of rash (p<0.01), diarrhea (p=0.03), or oral side effects (p=0.02) were independently associated with clinical benefit. Older age, better PS, and development of rash were associated with longer PFS and OS. Clinical parameters that appear to predict response to EGFR TKI include PS and age. EGFR mechanistic toxicities that develop during therapy are also highly associated with benefit and suggest a relationship between drug exposure and outcome.