Search

Abstract Objective This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis, evaluating the prognostic significance of the baseline Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) Score in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Methods A comprehensive search was performed across various databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, until October 21, 2023, to compile relevant articles for analysis. The investigation encompassed diverse clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results This analysis included a total of 15 articles, comprising 19 studies involving 3335 patients. Among the 19 studies, nine studies focused on NSCLC, and six studies were conducted on HCC. Pooled results revealed that patients with elevated ALI levels experienced prolonged OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37–0.70, p 1 was associated with reduced OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.47–2.92, p 2 showed a substantially decreased risk of mortality compared to individuals with HCC-GRIm score ≤ 2 (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.89–3.65, p

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis, evaluating the prognostic significance of the baseline Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) and Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) Score in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across various databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, until October 21, 2023, to compile relevant articles for analysis. The investigation encompassed diverse clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: This analysis included a total of 15 articles, comprising 19 studies involving 3335 patients. Among the 19 studies, nine studies focused on NSCLC, and six studies were conducted on HCC. Pooled results revealed that patients with elevated ALI levels experienced prolonged OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37–0.70, p < 0.001) and extended PFS (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52–0.72, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a GRIm score > 1 was associated with reduced OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.47–2.92, p < 0.001) and diminished PFS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35–2.34, p < 0.001) in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that ALI cutoff values of 18 exhibited enhanced predictive potential. Additionally, for HCC patients, those with HCC-GRIm score > 2 showed a substantially decreased risk of mortality compared to individuals with HCC-GRIm score ≤ 2 (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.89–3.65, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ALI and GRIm score served as dependable prognostic indicators for patients undergoing ICI therapy in the context of cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognostic value of the Gustave Roussy immune (GRIm) score in cancer patients has been widely reported but remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between the GRIm score and survival outcomes in cancer patients. Relevant literature was identified using electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from the inception to March 2023. The primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted during the meta-analysis. Fifteen studies (20 cohorts) including 4997 cancer patients were enrolled. The combined results revealed that patients in the high GRIm group had a deteriorated overall survival (HR = 2.07 95%CI: 1.73–2.48; p < 0.0001; I2 = 62%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.42; 95%CI: 1.22–1.66; p < 0.0001; I2 = 36%). The prognostic values of GRIm on overall survival and progression-free survival were observed across various tumour types and tumour stages. Sensitivity analysis supported the stability and reliability of the above results. Our evidence suggested that the GRIm score could be a valuable prognostic marker in cancer patients, which can be used by clinicians to stratify patients and formulate individualized treatment plans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackground The prognostic value of the Gustave Roussy immune (GRIm) score in cancer patients has been widely reported but remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between the GRIm score and survival outcomes in cancer patients.Methods Relevant literature was identified using electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from the inception to March 2023. The primary endpoints were long-term oncological outcomes. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted during the meta-analysis.Results Fifteen studies (20 cohorts) including 4997 cancer patients were enrolled. The combined results revealed that patients in the high GRIm group had a deteriorated overall survival (HR = 2.07 95%CI: 1.73–2.48; p

Background: The utilization of the Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm- Score) in patient selection for immunotherapy was initially reported. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the potential of the GRIm- Score, a novel prognostic score based on nutritional and inflammatory markers, as a prognostic predictor in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) undergoing immunotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study conducted at a single center included 159 patients with SCLC who received immunotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate potential differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients stratified by their GRIm-Score, utilizing the Kaplan– Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. The final independent prognostic factors were identified through both propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Our analysis of the 159 patients revealed that there was a significant decrease in both OS and PFS with each increase in the GRIm-Score group, displaying a stepwise pattern. Moreover, even after conducting PSM analysis, the significant associations between the modified three-category risk scale-based GRIm-Score and survival outcomes remained significant. Both the total cohort and PSM cohort were subjected to multivariable analysis, which demonstrated that the three-category risk assessment-based GRIm-Score was a valuable predictor of both OS and PFS. Conclusions: In addition, the GRIm-Score may serve as a valuable and noninvasive prognostic predictor for SCLC patients undergoing PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The role of intratumoural microbiome in the progression of malignant ascites secondary to HCC is still unknown. • Ascitis Gustave Roussy Immune (aGRIm) score shows superior prognostic significance to serum GRIm (sGRIm) score. • Significant bacterium in malignant ascites associated with the level of aGRIm score. • Significant immune cells in malignant ascites correlated with the level of aGRIm score. The Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score predicts survival outcomes in several cancers. However, the prognostic significance of the GRIm score in patients with malignant ascites has not yet been investigated. Clinical samples were collected from a cohort of patients with malignant ascites secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We calculated serum GRIm (sGRIm) and ascites GRIm (aGRIm) scores and divided the samples into low and high GRIm score groups. Survival analysis was used to compare the prognostic significance of the sGRIm and aGRIm scores. 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to determine the profiles of the intratumoral microbiota in the groups. A fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) assay was used to detect the expression of different immune cells by labeling seven markers of malignant ascites. 155 patients with HCC and malignant ascites were enrolled in this study. Survival analysis revealed that the aGRIm score showed a superior prognostic significance compared to the sGRIm score. Microbial analysis demonstrated that the bacterial richness and diversity were higher in the low aGRIm score group than in the high aGRIm score group. LefSe analysis revealed that certain bacteria were correlated with high aGRIm scores. Fluorescent mIHC displayed the tumor microenvironment of malignant ascites and found that the density of CD8 + T cells was significantly higher in the low aGRIm score group than in the high aGRIm score group. Our present study identified a novel scoring system (aGRIm score) that can predict the survival outcome of patients with malignant ascites secondary to HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is not yet an effective marker in predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) based on three objective variables, namely, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum albumin level (ALB), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), was developed as feasible prognostic indication in lung cancer patients receiving ICIs therapies. Our study aimed to adapt the GRIm-Score (HCC-GRIm-Score) in HCC patients who received ICIs therapies and thus improving the predictive ability. Methods: From January 2018 to September 2020, 261 patients who received ICIs therapy were retrospectively included and divided into training and validation groups. After determining the factors for HCC-GRIm-Score by multivariable analysis from training group, the optimized HCC-GRIm-Score was validated and compared to the original GRIm-Score and the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system. Results: One hundred sixty-one and 80 patients were assigned into the training and validation groups, respectively. Two more factors, aspartate transaminase-to-alanine transaminase ratio [hazard ratio (HR), 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94–2.42] and total bilirubin (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.07–2.88), were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and integrated in the HCC-GRIm-Score system according to the multivariable analysis. A risk score based on the HCC-GRIm-Score indicated that patients presenting high score (>2) suffered from significantly shorter median OS of 10.3 months compared to those with a low score (not reached; HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.89–4.75; p < 0.001). In the validation group of 80 patients, the patients presenting a high score showed an inferior OS (HR 5.62, 95% CI, 1.25–25.24; p = 0.024). HCC-GRIm-Score had the highest area under curve of 0.719 (95% CI, 0.661–0.773) compared to original GRIm-Score and BCLC staging system. Conclusion: The present study confirmed that the modified HCC-GRIm-Score system provided superior predictive ability in identifying the HCC patients potentially benefit from ICIs therapies, compared to the original GRIm-Score and the BCLC staging system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is not yet an effective marker in predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) based on three objective variables, namely, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum albumin level (ALB), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), was developed as feasible prognostic indication in lung cancer patients receiving ICIs therapies. Our study aimed to adapt the GRIm-Score (HCC-GRIm-Score) in HCC patients who received ICIs therapies and thus improving the predictive ability.Methods: From January 2018 to September 2020, 261 patients who received ICIs therapy were retrospectively included and divided into training and validation groups. After determining the factors for HCC-GRIm-Score by multivariable analysis from training group, the optimized HCC-GRIm-Score was validated and compared to the original GRIm-Score and the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system.Results: One hundred sixty-one and 80 patients were assigned into the training and validation groups, respectively. Two more factors, aspartate transaminase-to-alanine transaminase ratio [hazard ratio (HR), 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94–2.42] and total bilirubin (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.07–2.88), were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and integrated in the HCC-GRIm-Score system according to the multivariable analysis. A risk score based on the HCC-GRIm-Score indicated that patients presenting high score (>2) suffered from significantly shorter median OS of 10.3 months compared to those with a low score (not reached; HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.89–4.75; p < 0.001). In the validation group of 80 patients, the patients presenting a high score showed an inferior OS (HR 5.62, 95% CI, 1.25–25.24; p = 0.024). HCC-GRIm-Score had the highest area under curve of 0.719 (95% CI, 0.661–0.773) compared to original GRIm-Score and BCLC staging system.Conclusion: The present study confirmed that the modified HCC-GRIm-Score system provided superior predictive ability in identifying the HCC patients potentially benefit from ICIs therapies, compared to the original GRIm-Score and the BCLC staging system.

Aim: The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) was originally designed to select cancer patients for immunotherapy, and later was reported to be a novel prognostic scoring system in lung cancer and esophageal cancer. This study was aimed to determine the prognostic role and predictive performance of GRIm-Score in colorectal cancer (CRC) CRC patients. Methods: We conducted a single-institution study of 1,579 adult CRC patients receiving surgical removal, and those patients were divided into low GRIm-Score group (scores 0, 1) and high GRIm-Score group (scores 2, 3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was executed to balance the potential confounding factors between the two groups. Survival and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (Td-ROC) analyses were applied to depict the prognostic role and predictive significance of GRIm-Score in CRC patients. Results: There were 200 cases CRC patients in high GRIm-Score group and 1,379 cases in low GRIm-Score group. CRC patients with high GRIm-Score correspond with higher level of CEA, CA125, and inflammatory indexes, such as NLR, PLR, SII, PNI, and ALRI. Correlation analysis exhibited that GRIm-Score correlated well with the established inflammatory indexes. Survival analysis revealed that CRC patients in high GRIm-Score group showed worse overall survival (OS, P <0.0001) and disease-free survival (DFS, P <0.0001) compared with those in low GRIm-Score group. Results from multivariate Cox regression implicated that high GRIm-Score was not only a potent prognostic index for unfavorable OS (HR = 1.622, 95%CI: 1.118–2.355, P = 0.0109), but also a potent risk factor for worse DFS (HR = 1.743, 95%CI: 1.188–2.558, P = 0.0045). Td-ROC analysis demonstrated that GRIm-Score exhibited the superior discriminatory power in the prediction of OS and DFS when compared to SII, PNI, and ALRI. Such strong associations between high levels of preoperative GRIm-Score and unfavorable survival outcomes remained robust after PSM analysis. Conclusion: GRIm-Score, a novel inflammatory and nutritional risk scoring system, is a potent prognostic index in CRC patients receiving surgical removal. GRIm-Score can be used as an effective and simplified risk stratification tool for postoperative survival prediction of CRC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AimThe Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) was originally designed to select cancer patients for immunotherapy, and later was reported to be a novel prognostic scoring system in lung cancer and esophageal cancer. This study was aimed to determine the prognostic role and predictive performance of GRIm-Score in colorectal cancer (CRC) CRC patients.MethodsWe conducted a single-institution study of 1,579 adult CRC patients receiving surgical removal, and those patients were divided into low GRIm-Score group (scores 0, 1) and high GRIm-Score group (scores 2, 3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was executed to balance the potential confounding factors between the two groups. Survival and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (Td-ROC) analyses were applied to depict the prognostic role and predictive significance of GRIm-Score in CRC patients.ResultsThere were 200 cases CRC patients in high GRIm-Score group and 1,379 cases in low GRIm-Score group. CRC patients with high GRIm-Score correspond with higher level of CEA, CA125, and inflammatory indexes, such as NLR, PLR, SII, PNI, and ALRI. Correlation analysis exhibited that GRIm-Score correlated well with the established inflammatory indexes. Survival analysis revealed that CRC patients in high GRIm-Score group showed worse overall survival (OS, P

Backgrounds: The Gustave Roussy Immune score (GRIm-Score) emerges as a novel prognostic scoring system for patient selection in phase I trials testing targeted immunotherapy for advanced-stage cancer. We tried to assess potential prognostic roles of preoperative GRIm-Score in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis.Methods: This PSM-based analysis was performed on our single-center prospectively-maintained database between January 2014 and October 2015. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using the log-rank test was used to distinguish differences in both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the patients stratified by preoperative GRIm-Score. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis and PSM analysis were both carried out to determine the final independent prognostic parameters.Results: There were 405 patients with surgically resectable stage I-II NSCLC included. Both OS and DFS were significantly shortened along with each number increase in the GRIm-Score group, showing a step-wise fashion. Such strong correlations between preoperative GRIm-Score estimated by a modified 3-category risk scale and survival outcomes still remained validated after PSM analysis. In addition, this GRIm-Score held the superior discriminatory power for predicting both OS and DFS to the other peripheral blood biomarkers. Multivariable analyses on the entire cohort and the PSM cohort demonstrated that GRIm-Score based on a 3-category risk assessment scale could be independently predictive of both OS and DFS.Conclusions: The GRIm-Score tool can also serve as an effective and noninvasive marker to optimize prognostic prediction for surgically resectable stage I-II NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The utilization of the Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) in patient selection for immunotherapy was initially reported. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the potential of the GRIm-Score, a novel prognostic score based on nutritional and inflammatory markers, as a prognostic predictor in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) undergoing immunotherapy., Methods: This retrospective study conducted at a single center included 159 patients with SCLC who received immunotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate potential differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients stratified by their GRIm-Score, utilizing the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. The final independent prognostic factors were identified through both propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis., Results: Our analysis of the 159 patients revealed that there was a significant decrease in both OS and PFS with each increase in the GRIm-Score group, displaying a stepwise pattern. Moreover, even after conducting PSM analysis, the significant associations between the modified three-category risk scale-based GRIm-Score and survival outcomes remained significant. Both the total cohort and PSM cohort were subjected to multivariable analysis, which demonstrated that the three-category risk assessment-based GRIm-Score was a valuable predictor of both OS and PFS., Conclusions: In addition, the GRIm-Score may serve as a valuable and non-invasive prognostic predictor for SCLC patients undergoing PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Shangguan, Huang, Liu, Zhang, Zhang, Yu and Chen.)

Background: The Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic score (RMH score) and the Gustave Roussy immune score (GRIm-score) were developed in order to select more suitable patient for phase I trials. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and serum albumin concentration are common risk factors to these two systems. As the third risk factor, the RMH score and the GRIm-score adopt number of metastatic sites and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), respectively. We aimed to investigate whether these two systems are also useful for extensive disease of small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC)., Methods: We retrospectively collected 128 patients who had initiated platinum-based chemotherapy at our hospital between September 2007 and March 2018. We divided our patients into low (score 0 - 1) and high (2 - 3) score groups, and compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between them. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses found prognostic factors of survival times., Results: Regarding GRIm-score, OS was significantly shorter in high score group than in low score group (median 6.1 vs. 11.4 months, P < 0.01), while no significant difference was observed in PFS (median 4.7 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.12). Both OS (median 6.9 vs. 12.4 months, P < 0.01) and PFS (median 4.4 vs. 5.4 months, P = 0.01) were significantly shorter in high RMH score group than in low group. Multivariate analyses detected both high GRIm-score (hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 - 2.72, P < 0.01) and high RMH score (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.27 - 2.92, P < 0.01) as independent worse prognostic factors of OS, and then only high RMH score (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.04 - 2.25, P = 0.03) as independent worse prognostic factor of PFS., Conclusions: Both RMH score and GRIm-score are useful as independent prognostic factors of OS in ED-SCLC. However, only RMH score is an independent prognostic factor of PFS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright 2020, Minami et al.)

Background: The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) and the Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic score (RMH score) were recently developed in order to improve a better participant selection for phase I trials. The GRIm-Score is formed by combination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum albumin concentration, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The RMH score is calculated by LDH, albumin, and number of metastases. These two scores have been validated only in phase I trials. The purpose of this study was to assess whether these scores are useful for practical treatment of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This was a retrospective and single-centered study of 76 NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy between December 2015 and October 2018 at our hospital. We divided 76 patients into high and low GRIm-Score and RMH score groups. Comparison of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was performed by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS were analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses., Results: The OS of the high GRIm-Score group was significantly shorter than that of the low score group (low vs. high; median 19.9 vs. 3.2 months, P < 0.01), while no significant difference was observed in PFS (2.6 vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.13). The PFS of the high RMH score was significantly shorter than that of the low score group (low vs. high; 2.6 vs. 1.8 months, P = 0.01), while there was no significant difference in OS (16.0 vs. 10.4, P = 0.24). Multivariate analyses detected high GRIm-Score (hazard ratio (HR) 3.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04 - 7.58, P < 0.01), and high RMH score (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.03 - 3.02, P = 0.04) as poor prognostic factors of OS and PFS, respectively., Conclusions: Baseline GRIm-Score and RMH score were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS of ICI monotherapy for pretreated NSCLC patients, respectively. These two scores are not only selection biomarkers for patients in experimental trials, but also useful prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC patients practically treated with ICI therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Background: The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) was developed based on the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score for the purpose of a better patient selection for immunotherapy phase I trials. This scoring system is simply calculated by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and serum albumin concentration. The aim of our study was to determine whether GRIm-Score is a practically useful prognostic biomarker for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)., Methods: This retrospective and single institutional study collected 185 adenocarcinomas without active EGFR mutation, 115 squamous cell carcinomas treated with first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy, and 140 NSCLCs with mutant EGFR treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy. These treatments were initiated between July 2007 and March 2018 at our hospital. We compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between high and low GRIm-Score groups. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, we also found prognostic factors of survival times., Results: The OS and PFS of low GRIm-Score group were significantly longer than those of high-score group in wild-type EGFR adenocarcinoma (low vs. high; median OS, 18.4 vs. 5.1 months, P < 0.01, and median PFS, 5.8 vs. 3.7 months, P = 0.01) and EGFR-mutant NSCLC (median OS, 38.9 vs. 10.4 months, P < 0.01, and median PFS, 15.9 vs. 5.0 months, P < 0.01). Subsequent multivariate analyses detected high GRIm-Score in wild-type EGFR adenocarcinoma as a poor prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.20, 95% CI 1.47 - 3.31, P < 0.01), and in the EGFR-mutant NSCLC as a poor prognostic factor of PFS (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.00 - 3.55, P = 0.049)., Conclusions: High GRIm-Score was an independent prognostic biomarker of OS of first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy for wild-type EGFR adenocarcinoma and of PFS of first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Therefore, GRIm-Score is not only a specific selection marker for experimental immunotherapy trials, but may also be a promising and useful pretreatment prognostic maker for specific NSCLC subsets in the real-world practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.