Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using prostate MRI and patient risk factors., Methods: In total, 960 men who underwent MRI from 2015 to 2019 and biopsy either 6 months before or 6 months after MRI were identified. Men diagnosed with csPCa were identified, and csPCa risk was modeled using known patient factors (age, race, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) and prostate MRI findings (location, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, extraprostatic extension, dominant lesion size, and PSA density). csPCa was defined as Gleason score sum ≥ 7. Using a derivation cohort, a multivariable logistic regression model and a point-based scoring system were developed to predict csPCa. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in a separate independent validation cohort., Results: Among 960 MRI reports, 552 (57.5%) were from men diagnosed with csPCa. Using the derivation cohort (n = 632), variables that predicted csPCa were Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores of 4 and 5, the presence of extraprostatic extension, and elevated PSA density. Evaluation using the validation cohort (n = 328) resulted in an area under the curve of 0.77, with adequate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .58). At a risk threshold of >2 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 98.4% and negative predictive value of 78.6% but prevented only 4.3% potential biopsies (0-2 points; 14 of 328). At a higher threshold of >5 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 89.5% and negative predictive value of 70.1% and avoided 20.4% of biopsies (0-5 points; 67 of 328)., Conclusions: The point-based model reported here can potentially identify a vast majority of men at risk for csPCa, while avoiding biopsy in about 1 in 5 men with elevated PSA levels., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the volume of intravenous iodinated contrast media utilized for CT before, during, and after the global iohexol shortage over a total of 17 months at a multisite health system., Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent CT at a large health system with 12 sites. Standardized contrast doses for 13 CT examinations were implemented 5/23/22. Mean contrast utilization per CT encounter was compared between 3 periods (pre-intervention 1/1/22-5/22/22; intervention 5/23/22-9/11/22; post-intervention 9/12/23-6/30/23). Contrast doses and CT encounter data were extracted from the enterprise data warehouse. Categorical variables were compared with a chi-squared test and continuous variables were compared with a two-tailed t-test. Multivariable linear regression assessed significance, with coefficients noted to determine magnitude and direction of effect., Results: Pre-intervention, there were 152,009 examinations (87,722 with contrast, 57.7%), during the intervention 120,031 examinations (63,217 with contrast, 52.7%), and post-intervention 341,862 examinations (194,231 with contrast, 56.8%). Pre-intervention, mean contrast dose was 89.3 mL per exam, which decreased to 78.0 mL following standardization (Δ of -12.7%) (p<0.001). This decrease continued throughout the intervention and persisted in the post-intervention period (80.4 mL; Δ -10.0%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, patient weight, sex, and performing site were all associated with variations in contrast dose. Most but not all sites (9/12) sustained the decreased contrast media dose in the post-intervention period., Discussion: Implementing standardized contrast media dosing for commonly performed CT examinations led to a rapid decrease in contrast media utilization which persisted over 1 year., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To assess indications, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous adrenal mass biopsy in contemporary practice., Methods: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective study included all patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided adrenal mass biopsies at an academic health system from January 6, 2015, to January 6, 2023. Patient demographics, biopsy indications, mass size, laboratory data, pathology results, and complications were recorded. Final diagnoses were based on pathology or ≥ 1 year of imaging follow-up when biopsy specimens did not yield malignant tissue. Test performance calculations excluded repeat biopsies. Continuous variables were compared with Student's t test, dichotomous variables with chi-squared test., Results: A total of 160 patients underwent 186 biopsies. Biopsies were indicated to diagnose metastatic disease (139/186; 74.7%), for oncologic research only (27/186; 14.5%), diagnose metastatic disease and oncologic research (15/186; 8%), and diagnose an incidental adrenal mass (5/186; 2.7%). Biopsy specimens were diagnostic in 154 patients (96.3%) and non-diagnostic in 6 (3.8%). Diagnostic biopsies yielded malignant tissue (n = 136), benign adrenal tissue (n = 12), and benign adrenal neoplasms (n = 6) with sensitivity = 98.6% (136/138), specificity = 100% (16/16), positive predictive value = 100% (136/136), and negative predictive value = 88.9% (16/18). Adverse events followed 11/186 procedures (5.9%) and most minor (7/11, 63.6%). The adverse event rate was similar whether tissue was obtained for clinical or research purposes (10/144; 6.9% vs. 1/42; 2.4%, p = 0.27), despite more specimens obtained for research (5.8 vs. 3.7, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Percutaneous adrenal mass biopsy is safe, accurate, and utilized almost exclusively to diagnose metastatic disease or for oncologic research. The negative predictive value is high when diagnostic tissue samples are obtained. Obtaining specimens for research does not increase adverse event risk., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Multiple strategies integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data have been proposed to determine the need for a prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score ≥3 + 4). However, inconsistencies across different strategies create challenges for drawing a definitive conclusion., Objective: To determine the optimal prostate biopsy decision-making strategy for avoiding unnecessary biopsies and minimizing the risk of missing csPCa by combining MRI Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) and clinical data., Data Sources: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to July 1, 2022., Study Selection: English-language studies that evaluated men with suspected but not confirmed csPCa who underwent MRI PI-RADS followed by prostate biopsy were included. Each study had proposed a biopsy plan by combining PI-RADS and clinical data., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Studies were independently assessed for eligibility for inclusion. Quality of studies was appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Mixed-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression models with multimodel inference were performed. Reporting of this study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline., Main Outcomes and Measures: Independent risk factors of csPCa were determined by performing meta-regression between the rate of csPCa and PI-RADS and clinical parameters. Yields of different biopsy strategies were assessed by performing diagnostic meta-analysis., Results: The analyses included 72 studies comprising 36 366 patients. Univariable meta-regression showed that PI-RADS 4 (β-coefficient [SE], 7.82 [3.85]; P = .045) and PI-RADS 5 (β-coefficient [SE], 23.18 [4.46]; P < .001) lesions, but not PI-RADS 3 lesions (β-coefficient [SE], -4.08 [3.06]; P = .19), were significantly associated with a higher risk of csPCa. When considered jointly in a multivariable model, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) was the only clinical variable significantly associated with csPCa (β-coefficient [SE], 15.50 [5.14]; P < .001) besides PI-RADS 5 (β-coefficient [SE], 9.19 [3.33]; P < .001). Avoiding biopsy in patients with lesions with PI-RADS category of 3 or less and PSAD less than 0.10 (vs <0.15) ng/mL2 resulted in reducing 30% (vs 48%) of unnecessary biopsies (compared with performing biopsy in all suspected patients), with an estimated sensitivity of 97% (vs 95%) and number needed to harm of 17 (vs 15)., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that in patients with suspected csPCa, patient-tailored prostate biopsy decisions based on PI-RADS and PSAD could prevent unnecessary procedures while maintaining high sensitivity.

Background Splenic biopsy is rarely performed because of the perceived risk of hemorrhagic complications. Purpose To evaluate the safety of large bore (≥18 gauge) image-guided splenic biopsy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients who underwent US- or CT-guided splenic biopsy between March 2001 and March 2022 at eight academic institutions in the United States. Biopsies were performed with needles that were 18 gauge or larger, with a comparison group of biopsies with needles smaller than 18 gauge. The primary outcome was significant bleeding after the procedure, defined by the presence of bleeding at CT performed within 30 days or angiography and/or surgery performed to manage the bleeding. Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test and medians were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Results A total of 239 patients (median age, 63 years; IQR, 50-71 years; 116 of 239 [48.5%] female patients) underwent splenic biopsy with an 18-gauge or smaller needle and 139 patients (median age, 58 years [IQR, 49-69 years]; 66 of 139 [47.5%] female patients) underwent biopsy with a needle larger than 18 gauge. Bleeding was detected in 20 of 239 (8.4%) patients in the 18-gauge or smaller group and 11 of 139 (7.9%) in the larger than 18-gauge group. Bleeding was treated in five of 239 (2.1%) patients in the 18-gauge or smaller group and one of 139 (1%) in the larger than 18-gauge group. No deaths related to the biopsy procedure were recorded during the study period. Patients with bleeding after biopsy had smaller lesions compared with patients without bleeding (median, 2.1 cm [IQR, 1.6-5.4 cm] vs 3.5 cm [IQR, 2-6.8 cm], respectively; P = .03). Patients with a history of lymphoma or leukemia showed a lower incidence of bleeding than patients without this history (three of 90 [3%] vs 28 of 288 [9.7%], respectively; P = .05). Conclusion Bleeding after splenic biopsy with a needle 18 gauge or larger was similar to biopsy with a needle smaller than 18 gauge and seen in 8% of procedures overall, with 2% overall requiring treatment. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Grant in this issue.

Although the transition from peer review to peer learning has had favorable outcomes in diagnostic radiology, experience with implementing a team-based peer review system in interventional radiology (IR) remains limited. Peer learning systems benefit diverse IR teams composed of multiple clinical roles and could contribute value in archiving events that have potential educational value. With multiple stakeholder input from clinical roles within the IR division at our institution (ie, radiologic technologists, nurses, advanced practice providers, residents, fellows, and attending physicians), we launched a HIPAA-compliant secure IR complication and learning opportunity reporting platform in April 2022. Case submissions were monitored over the subsequent 24 weeks, with monthly dashboard reports provided to departmental leadership. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were used to assess the impact of the peer learning platform and adverse event reporting in IR (IR-PEER) on perceptions of complication reporting in the IR division across clinical roles. Ninety-two peer learning submissions were collected for a weekly average ± standard error of 3.8 ± 0.6 submissions per week, and an additional 26 submissions were collected as part of the division's ongoing monthly complication review conference, for a total of 98 unique total case references. A total of 64.1% of submissions (59 of 92) involved a complication and/or adverse event, and 35.9% of submissions (33 of 92) identified a learning opportunity (no complication or adverse event). Nurses reported that IR-PEER made the complication-reporting process easier (P = .01), and all clinical roles reported that IR-PEER improved the overall process of complication reporting. Peer learning frameworks such as IR-PEER provide a more equitable communication platform for multidisciplinary teams to capture and archive learning opportunities that support quality and safety improvement efforts., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND. Patients with cancer undergo frequent CT examinations with iodinated contrast media and may be uniquely predisposed to contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a model for predicting the risk of CA-AKI after contrast-enhanced CT in patients with cancer. METHODS. This retrospective study included 25,184 adult patients (12,153 men, 13,031 women; mean age, 62.3 ± 13.7 [SD] years) with cancer who underwent 46,593 contrast-enhanced CT examinations between January 1, 2016, and June 20, 2020, at one of three academic medical centers. Information was recorded regarding demographics, malignancy type, medication use, baseline laboratory values, and comorbid conditions. CA-AKI was defined as a 0.3-mg/dL or greater increase in serum creatinine level from baseline within 48 hours after CT or a 1.5-fold or greater increase in the peak measurement within 14 days after CT. Multivariable models accounting for correlated data were used to identify risk factors for CA-AKI. A risk score for predicting CA-AKI was generated in a development set ( n = 30,926) and tested in a validation set ( n = 15,667). RESULTS. CA-AKI occurred after 5.8% (2682/46,593) of CT examinations. The final multivariable model for predicting CA-AKI included hematologic malignancy, diuretic use, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3a, CKD stage 3b, CKD stage 4 or 5, serum albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL, platelet count less than 150 × 10 3 /μL, 1+ or greater proteinuria on baseline urinalysis, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and contrast medium volume 100 mL or greater. A risk score (range, 0-53 points) was generated with these variables. The most points (13) were for CKD stage 4 or 5 and for albumin level less than 3 g/dL. The frequency of CA-AKI progressively increased in higher risk categories. For example, in the validation set, CA-AKI occurred after 2.2% of CT examinations in the lowest risk category (score ≤ 4) and after 32.7% of CT examinations in the highest risk category (score ≥ 30). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test result indicated that the risk score was a good fit ( p = .40). CONCLUSION. A risk model in which readily available clinical data are used to predict the likelihood of CA-AKI after contrast-enhanced CT in patients with cancer was developed and validated. CLINICAL IMPACT. The model may help facilitate appropriate implementation of preventive measures in the care of patients at high risk of CA-AKI.

Objective: The aim of the study is to determine whether computed tomography (CT) urography (CTU) can characterize incidental adrenal nodules., Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center. Patients were identified by free text search of CTU reports that contained the terms "adrenal mass" "adrenal nodule" and "adrenal lesion." Computed tomography urography technique consisted of unenhanced images and postcontrast images obtained at 100 seconds and 15 minutes. The final cohort included 145 patients with 151 adrenal nodules. Nodules were considered lipid-rich adenomas or myelolipomas based on unenhanced imaging characteristics. Absolute and relative washout values were calculated for the remaining nodules, using a cutoff of 60% and 40%, respectively, to diagnose adenomas. Reference standard for lipid-poor adenomas and malignant nodules was histopathology or imaging/clinical follow-up. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables., Results: One hundred nodules were lipid-rich adenomas and 3 were myelolipomas. Forty-eight nodules were indeterminate at unenhanced CT, corresponding to 39 lipid-poor adenomas and 9 malignant nodules based on reference standards. Both absolute and relative washout correctly characterized 71% of nodules (34/48), with a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 89%. Overall, 91% of all adrenal nodules (137/151) were correctly characterized by CTU alone. Lipid-poor adenomas were smaller than malignant nodules ( P < 0.01) and were lower in attenuation on unenhanced and delayed images ( P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Adrenal nodules detected at 3-phase CTU can be accurately characterized, potentially eliminating the need for subsequent adrenal protocol CT or magnetic resonance imaging., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND. Adrenal masses are often indeterminate on single-phase postcontrast CT. Dual-energy CT (DECT) with three-material decomposition algorithms may aid characterization. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of metrics derived from portal venous phase DECT, including virtual noncontrast (VNC) attenuation, fat fraction, iodine density, and relative enhancement ratio, for characterizing adrenal masses. METHODS. This retrospective study included 128 patients (82 women, 46 men; mean age, 64.6 ± 12.7 [SD] years) who between January 2016 and December 2019 underwent portal venous phase abdominopelvic DECT that showed a total of 139 adrenal lesions with an available reference standard based on all imaging, clinical, and pathologic records (87 adenomas, 52 nonadenomas [48 metastases, two adrenal cortical carcinomas, one ganglioneuroma, one hematoma]). Two radiologists placed ROIs to determine the following characteristics of the masses: VNC attenuation, fat fraction, iodine density normalized to portal vein, and for masses with VNC greater than 10 HU, relative enhancement ratio (ratio of portal venous phase attenuation to VNC attenuation). Readers' mean measurements were used for ROC analyses, and clinically optimal thresholds were derived as thresholds yielding the highest sensitivity at 100% specificity. RESULTS. Adenomas and nonadenomas were significantly different (all p < .001) in VNC attenuation (mean ± SD, 18.5 ± 12.9 vs 34.1 ± 8.9 HU), fat fraction (mean ± SD, 24.3% ± 8.2% vs 14.2% ± 5.6%), normalized iodine density (mean ± SD, 0.34 ± 0.15 vs 0.17 ± 0.17), and relative enhancement ratio (mean ± SD, 186% ± 96% vs 58% ± 59%). AUCs for all metrics ranged from 0.81 through 0.91. The metric with highest sensitivity for adenoma at the clinically optimal threshold (i.e., 100% specificity) was fat fraction (threshold, ≥ 23.8%; sensitivity, 59% [95% CI, 48-69%]) followed by VNC attenuation (≤ 15.2 HU; sensitivity, 39% [95% CI, 29-50%]), relative enhancement ratio (≥ 214%; sensitivity, 37% [95% CI, 25-50%]), and normalized iodine density (≥ 0.90; sensitivity, 1% (95% CI, 0-60%]). VNC attenuation at the traditional true noncontrast attenuation threshold of 10 HU or lower had sensitivity of 28% (95% CI, 19-38%) and 100% specificity. Presence of fat fraction 23.8% or greater or relative enhancement ratio 214% or greater yielded sensitivity of 68% (95% CI, 57-77%) with 100% specificity. CONCLUSION. For adrenal lesions evaluated with single-phase DECT, fat fraction had higher sensitivity than VNC attenuation at both the clinically optimal threshold and the traditional threshold of 10 HU or lower. CLINICAL IMPACT. By helping to definitively diagnose adenomas, DECT-derived metrics can help avoid downstream imaging for incidental adrenal lesions.

Objective: Determine the rate of documented notification, via an alert, for intra-institutional discrepant radiologist opinions and addended reports and resulting clinical management changes., Methods: This institutional review board-exempt, retrospective study was performed at a large academic medical center. We defined an intra-institutional discrepant opinion as when a consultant radiologist provides a different interpretation from that formally rendered by a colleague at our institution. We implemented a discrepant opinion policy requiring closed-loop notification of the consulting radiologist's second opinion to the original radiologist, who must acknowledge this alert within 30 days. This study included all discrepant opinion alerts created December 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, of which two radiologists and an internal medicine physician performed consensus review. Primary outcomes were degree of discrepancy and percent of discrepant opinions leading to change in clinical management. Secondary outcome was report addendum rate compared with an existing peer learning program using Fisher's exact test., Results: Of 114 discrepant opinion alerts among 1,888,147 reports generated during the study period (0.006%), 58 alerts were categorized as major (50.9%), 41 as moderate (36.0%), and 15 as minor discrepancies (13.1%). Clinical management change occurred in 64 of 114 cases (56.1%). Report addendum rate for discrepant opinion alerts was 4-fold higher than for peer learning alerts at our institution (66 of 315 = 21% versus 432 of 8,273 =5.2%; P < .0001)., Discussion: Although discrepant intra-institutional radiologist second opinions were rare, they frequently led to changes in clinical management. Capturing these discrepancies by encouraging alert use may help optimize patient care and document what was communicated to the referring or consulting care team by consulting radiologists., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare thoracic and abdominal radiologists' follow-up recommendations for abdominal findings identified on chest CT., Methods: This Institutional Review Board-exempt, retrospective study was performed at a large academic medical center with subspecialty radiology divisions. We used a combination of natural language processing and manual reviews to identify chest CT reports with and without abdominal findings that were interpreted by thoracic radiologists in 2019. Three random samples of reports were reviewed by two subspecialty trained abdominal radiologists for their agreement with thoracic radiologists' reporting: abdominal findings with follow-up recommendation (Group 1), abdominal findings without follow-up recommendation (Group 2), and no abdominal findings reported (Group 3). Primary outcome was agreement between thoracic and abdominal radiologists for the need for follow-up of abdominal findings. Secondary outcomes were agreement between subspecialists for the presence of abdominal findings and referring clinician adherence to recommendations. Fischer's exact test was used to compare proportions., Results: Abdominal radiologists agreed with need for follow-up in 48.5% (16/33) of Group 1 cases and agreed follow-up was not necessary for 100% (34/34) of Group 2 cases (p < 0.001). Abdominal radiologists identified abdominal findings in 31.4% (11/35) of Group 3 cases, none of which required follow-up. Referring clinician adherence to thoracic radiologist follow-up recommendations for abdominal findings was 13/33 (39.4%)., Conclusion: Abdominal radiologists frequently disagreed with thoracic radiologist recommendations for follow-up of abdominal findings on chest CT. Chest radiologists may consider abdominal subspecialty consultation or clinical decision support to reduce unnecessary imaging., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Substantial variation in imaging terms used to describe the adrenal gland and adrenal findings leads to ambiguity and uncertainty in radiology reports and subsequently their understanding by referring clinicians. The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized lexicon to describe adrenal imaging findings at CT and MRI., Methods: Fourteen members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology adrenal neoplasm disease-focused panel (SAR-DFP) including one endocrine surgeon participated to develop an adrenal lexicon using a modified Delphi process to reach consensus. Five radiologists prepared a preliminary list of 35 imaging terms that was sent to the full group as an online survey (19 general imaging terms, 9 specific to CT, and 7 specific to MRI). In the first round, members voted on terms to be included and proposed definitions; subsequent two rounds were used to achieve consensus on definitions (defined as ≥ 80% agreement)., Results: Consensus for inclusion was reached on 33/35 terms with two terms excluded (anterior limb and normal adrenal size measurements). Greater than 80% consensus was reached on the definitions for 15 terms following the first round, with subsequent consensus achieved for the definitions of the remaining 18 terms following two additional rounds. No included term had remaining disagreement., Conclusion: Expert consensus produced a standardized lexicon for reporting adrenal findings at CT and MRI. The use of this consensus lexicon should improve radiology report clarity, standardize clinical and research terminology, and reduce uncertainty for referring providers when adrenal findings are present., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background Adrenal masses are common, but radiology reporting and recommendations for management can be variable. Purpose To create a machine learning algorithm to segment adrenal glands on contrast-enhanced CT images and classify glands as normal or mass-containing and to assess algorithm performance. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included two groups of contrast-enhanced abdominal CT examinations (development data set and secondary test set). Adrenal glands in the development data set were manually segmented by radiologists. Images in both the development data set and the secondary test set were manually classified as normal or mass-containing. Deep learning segmentation and classification models were trained on the development data set and evaluated on both data sets. Segmentation performance was evaluated with use of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and classification performance with use of sensitivity and specificity. Results The development data set contained 274 CT examinations (251 patients; median age, 61 years; 133 women), and the secondary test set contained 991 CT examinations (991 patients; median age, 62 years; 578 women). The median model DSC on the development test set was 0.80 (IQR, 0.78-0.89) for normal glands and 0.84 (IQR, 0.79-0.90) for adrenal masses. On the development reader set, the median interreader DSC was 0.89 (IQR, 0.78-0.93) for normal glands and 0.89 (IQR, 0.85-0.97) for adrenal masses. Interreader DSC for radiologist manual segmentation did not differ from automated machine segmentation ( P = .35). On the development test set, the model had a classification sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 55, 95) and specificity of 89% (95% CI: 75, 96). On the secondary test set, the model had a classification sensitivity of 69% (95% CI: 58, 79) and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 90, 92). Conclusion A two-stage machine learning pipeline was able to segment the adrenal glands and differentiate normal adrenal glands from those containing masses. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

BACKGROUND. Radiology informatics systems and clinical decision support tools in the electronic health record (EHR) can be leveraged to help impact ordering patterns in response to the ongoing global iodinated contrast media shortage. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of EHR order entry-based interventions, implemented as part of a health system's response to the global contrast media shortage, on contrast-enhanced CT utilization. METHODS. This retrospective study included 79,259 patients who underwent CT at a large multisite health system between April 1, 2022, and July 3, 2022. Two EHR-based interventions were implemented as part of the health system's response to the global contrast media shortage. A first EHR-based intervention on May 10, 2022, entailed creating an alert that appeared in a sidebar after any contrast-enhanced body CT orders, indicating the present shortage and recommending alternate imaging modalities. A second EHR-based intervention on May 16, 2022, required referrers to enter detailed clinical information for all contrast-enhanced body CT orders, which radiologists used when protocoling examinations. Data regarding CT orders and examinations performed were extracted from the electronic data warehouse. RESULTS. During the preintervention, first postintervention, and second postintervention periods, the mean number of patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT per weekday was 726, 689, and 639, respectively ( p for preintervention vs second postintervention periods, < .001). During the three periods, the mean number of patients who underwent CT per weekday was 1350, 1323, and 1314 ( p < .001). During the three periods, the mean number of patients who underwent contrast-enhanced body CT per weekday was 561, 532, and 492 ( p < .001). During the three periods, the mean number of orders for CT with IV contrast media per weekday was 154, 143, and 131 ( p < .001). During the three periods, the mean number of orders for CT without IV contrast media per weekday was 196, 202, and 221 ( p < .001). CONCLUSION. EHR order entry-based interventions implemented in response to the global contrast media shortage significantly reduced contrast-enhanced CT utilization in a large health system. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings indicate the ability to rapidly achieve changes in ordering clinician behavior and subsequent clinical practice using systemwide EHR changes.

Objective: A common opportunity to collect research samples is during image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsies (CNBs) performed when clinically indicated or for assessing clinical trial eligibility. The relative safety of extra CNBs collected for research is undefined., Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent CNB for research purposes only [RO], as clinically indicated [CI], or as part of a clinical trial [CT] were identified. 30-day post-procedure adverse events (AEs) among the cohorts were examined and compared to the 2020 Society of Interventional Radiology QI guidelines., Results: 236 patients with thoracic cancers (90 % NSCLC, 5 % SCLC, 4 % mesothelioma, and 1 % thymic) had 292 CNBs (63 RO, 229 CI + CT). AEs occurred in 13 % of both the RO and CI + CT groups. Compared to the CI + CT group, the RO group did not have a higher pneumothorax incidence (RO: 5/29 [17 %], CI + CT: 18/114 [16 %], p = 0.79); both were below the suggested QI threshold of 45 % for pneumothorax. There was a negative association between number of cores obtained and risk of AE (AE vs no AE mean cores = 3.5 vs 4.8). After adjusting for the number of cores and smoking history, RO vs CI + CT lung biopsies had a higher risk of AEs (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 2.44, 1.08-5.55, p = 0.03 vs non-lung aRR = 0.86, 0.10-7.09, p = 0.89)., Conclusion: CNBs performed for research purposes do not have a significantly increased risk of AEs when compared to those performed for clinical trials and/or when clinically indicated. However, AEs were most frequent in lung biopsies. When performing research biopsies, a target other than lung may be preferred when clinically appropriate., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: C.B. reports personal fees from Takeda. P.A.J. reports grants from The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, grants from American Cancer Society, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche/Genentech, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Ignyta, personal fees from LOXO Oncology, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from SFJ Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Voronoi, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Biocartis, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Takeda Oncology, personal fees from Transcenta, personal fees from Silicon Therapeutics, personal fees from Syndax, personal fees from Nuvalent, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Esai, grants from PUMA, grants from Astellas Pharmaceuticals, grants from Revolution Medicines, personal fees from Mirati Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. J.L has received honoraria from Targeted Oncology and Physicians’ Education Resource; and personal fees from Erasca, Blueprint Medicines, and Daiichi Sankyo. B.E.J reports personal fees from Novartis, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Foundation Medicine, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Hengrui Therapeutics, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Eli Lilly outside the submitted work; in addition, B.E. Johnson has a patent for EGFR Mutation Testing licensed and with royalties paid from DFCI and MGH., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Prior studies used submission numbers or report addendum rates to measure peer learning programs' (PLP) impact. We assessed the educational value of a PLP by manually reviewing cases submitted to identify factors correlating with meaningful learning opportunities (MLOs)., Methods: This institutional review board-exempted, retrospective study was performed in a large academic radiology department generating >800,000 reports annually. A PLP facilitating radiologist-to-radiologist feedback was implemented May 1, 2017, with subsequent pay-for-performance initiatives encouraging increasing submissions, >18,000 by 2019. Two radiologists blinded to submitter and receiver identity categorized 336 randomly selected submissions as a MLO, not meaningful, or equivocal, resolving disagreements in consensus review. Primary outcome was proportion of MLOs. Secondary outcomes included percent engagement by subspecialty clinical division and comparing MLO and report addendum rates via Fisher's exact tests. We assessed association between peer learning category, pay-for-performance interventions, and subspecialty division with MLOs using logistic regression., Results: Of 336 PLP submissions, 65.2% (219 of 336) were categorized as meaningful, 27.4% (92 of 336) not meaningful, and 7.4% (25 of 336) equivocal, with substantial reviewer agreement (86.0% [289 of 336], κ = 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.78). MLO rate (65.2% [219 of 336]) was five times higher than addendum rate (12.9% [43 of 333]) for the cohort. MLO proportion (adjusted odds ratios 0.05-1.09) and percent engagement (0.5%-3.6%) varied between subspecialty divisions, some submitting significantly fewer MLOs (P < .01). MLO proportion did not vary between peer learning categories., Conclusion: Educational value of a large-scale PLP, estimated through manual review of case submissions, is likely a more accurate measure of program impact. Incentives to enhance PLP use did not diminish the program's educational value., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND. Practices vary for screening patients for risk of renal dysfunction before administration of iodinated contrast medium. A 2020 American College of Radiology/National Kidney Foundation (ACR/NKF) consensus statement provided streamlined screening criteria. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the yield of patient-reported risk factors for identifying estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 before outpatient CT. METHODS. This retrospective study was performed at a health system that implemented an electronic screening form for patients to complete before outpatient CT encounters to report undergoing dialysis, taking cancer-treating medications, having kidney disease, undergoing prior kidney surgery, having diabetes mellitus treated with medication, having hypertension treated with medication, or having multiple myeloma. Patients with any risk factor were required to undergo eGFR testing before CT. Of 44,708 patients completing the form from June 1, 2020, through February 28, 2021, 10,256 patients (5315 men, 4941 women; mean age, 66.8 ± 11.9 [SD] years; range, 21-98 years) underwent eGFR testing on the day of CT. Multivariable regression analysis for predicting reduced eGFR was performed. Findings were compared with those from theoretic use of the ACR/NKF criteria. RESULTS. Same-day testing yielded eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in 1.4% (144/10,256) of patients. The only significant independent predictors of low eGFR were dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 203.30], kidney disease (OR, 12.55), and diabetes mellitus treated with medication (OR, 2.44). If the ACR/NKF criteria (only kidney disease, defined as dialysis, kidney disease, or prior kidney surgery) had been followed as a trigger for eGFR testing, the number of patients needing testing would have decreased 89.7%, from 10,256 to 1059; yield would have increased to 7.2% (76/1059); and 47.2% (68/144) of patients with low eGFR would have been missed. If the ACR/NKF criteria had been followed but diabetes mellitus been considered a required rather than an optional criterion, the number of patients needing testing would have decreased 77.1%, to 2353; yield would have increased to 4.0% (95/2353); and 34.0% (49/144) of patients with low eGFR would have been missed. CONCLUSION. Using patient-reported risk factors resulted in frequent eGFR testing but low yield of low eGFR. Commonly applied risk factors were not independently associated with low eGFR. CLINICAL IMPACT. Application of ACR/NKF criteria would substantially reduce eGFR testing, but patients with renal dysfunction would be missed. The statement should consider omitting kidney surgery as a trigger for eGFR testing and including diabetes mellitus as a required trigger.

Objective: This study aimed to determine effect of modality, care setting, and radiology subspecialty on frequency of diagnostic image quality issues identified by radiologists during image interpretation., Methods: This Institutional Review Board-exempt retrospective study was performed 10/1/18-6/30/20 at an academic radiology practice performing 700,000+ examinations annually. A closed-loop communication tool integrated in PACS workflow enabled radiologists to alert technologists to image quality issues. Radiologists categorized communications as requiring patient callback, or as technologist learning opportunities if image quality was adequate to generate a diagnostic report. Fisher's exact test assessed impact of imaging modality, radiology subspecialty, and care setting on radiologist-identified image quality issues., Results: 976,915 imaging examinations were performed during the study period. Radiologists generated 1,935 technologist learning opportunities (0.20%) and 208 callbacks (0.02%). Learning opportunity rates were highest for MRI (0.60%) when compared to CT (0.26%) and radiography (0.08%) (p<0.0001). The same was true for patient callbacks (MRI 0.13%, CT 0.02%, radiography 0.0006%; p<0.0001). Outpatient examinations generated more learning opportunities (1479/637,092; 0.23%) vs. inpatient (305/200,206; 0.15%) and Emergency Department (151/139,617; 0.11%) (p<0.0001). Abdominal subspecialists were most likely to generate learning opportunities when compared to other subspecialists and cardiovascular imagers were most likely to call a patient back., Conclusions: Image quality issues identified by radiologists during the interpretation process were rare and 10 times more commonly categorized as learning opportunities not interfering with a clinically adequate report than as requiring patient callback. Further work is necessary to determine if creating learning opportunities leads to fewer patients requiring repeat examinations., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Assess use of a diagnostic certainty scale (CS) for abdominal imaging reports and identify factors associated with greater adoption., Methods: This retrospective, Institutional Review Board-exempt study was conducted at an academic health system. Abdominal radiology reports containing diagnostic certainty phrases (DCPs) generated 4/1/2019-3/31/2021 were identified by a natural language processing tool. Reports containing DCPs were subdivided into those with/without a CS inserted at the end. Primary outcome was monthly CS use rate in reports containing DCPs. Secondary outcomes were assessment of factors associated with CS use, and usage of recommended DCPs over time. Chi-square test was used to compare proportions; univariable and multivariable regression assessed impact of other variables., Results: DCPs were used in 81,281/124,501 reports (65.3%). One-month post-implementation, 82/2310 (3.6%) of reports with DCPs contained the CS, increasing to 1862/4644 (40.1%) by study completion (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated reports containing recommended DCPs were more likely to have the CS (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.5; p < 0.001). Using CT as a reference, CS use was lower for ultrasound (OR 0.73; p < 0.001) and X-ray (OR 0.38; p < 0.001). There was substantial inter-radiologist variation in CS use (OR 0.01-26.3, multiple p values)., Conclusion: DCPs are very common in abdominal imaging reports and can be further clarified with CS use. Although voluntary CS adoption increased 13-fold over 2 years, > 50% of reports with DCPs lacked the CS at study's end. More stringent interventions, including embedding the scale in report templates, are likely needed to reduce inter-radiologist variation and decrease ambiguity in conveying diagnostic certainty to referring providers and patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Materials and Methods: This prospective single-arm study enrolled 15 men treated with IG-IMRT for localized prostate cancer. All participants received a dedicated 3 Tesla MRI examination of the prostate in addition to a pelvic CT examination for treatment planning. Two volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with a prescription dose of 79.2 Gy were designed using identical constraints based on CT- and MRI-defined consensus volumes. The volume of rectum exposed to 70 Gy or more was compared using the Wilcoxon paired signed rank test., Results: For CT-based treatment plans, the median volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy or more was 9.3 cubic centimeters (cc) (IQR 7.0 to 10.2) compared with 4.9 cc (IQR 4.1 to 7.8) for MRI-based plans. This resulted in a median volume reduction of 2.1 cc (IQR 0.5 to 5.3, P  < .001)., Conclusions: Using MRI to plan prostate IG-IMRT to a dose of 79.2 Gy reduces the volume of rectum receiving radiation dose in excess of tolerance (70 Gy or more) and should be considered in men who are at high risk for late rectal toxicity and are not good candidates for other rectal sparing techniques such as hydrogel spacer. This trial is registered with NCT02470910., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this study., (Copyright © 2022 Daniel R. Schmidt et al.)

Purpose: To assess the impact of periprocedural factors, including adverse events, on overall patient survival following image-guided liver tumor cryoablation procedures., Methods: In this retrospective single-institution study, 143 patients (73 male, 70 female, ages 29-88) underwent 169 image-guided liver tumor cryoablation procedures between October 1998 and August 2014. Patient, tumor and procedural variables were recorded. The primary outcome was overall survival post-procedure (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Secondary outcomes were the impact of 15 variables on patient survival, which were assessed with multivariate cox regression and log-rank tests., Results: Mean tumor diameter was 2.5 ± 1.2 cm. 26 of 143 (18.2%) patients had primary hepatic malignancies; 117 of 143 (81.8%) had liver metastases. Survival analysis revealed survivor functions at 3, 5, 7, 10 and 12 years post-ablation of 0.54, 0.37, 0.30, 0.17 and 0.06, with mean survival time of 40.8 ± 4.9 months. Tumor size ≥4 cm ( p  = .018), pre-procedural platelet count <100 × 10 3 /μL ( p  = .023), and prior local radiation therapy ( p  = .014) were associated with worse overall patient survival. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were not associated with reduced survival ( p  = .49)., Conclusions: All variables associated with overall survival were patient-related and none were associated with the cryoablation procedure. Pre-procedural thrombocytopenia, larger tumor size and history of prior local radiation therapy were independent risk factors for reduced overall survival in patients undergoing hepatic cryoablation. Adverse events related to hepatic cryoablation were not associated with decreased survival.

Purpose: To assess the association of imaging features of acute pancreatitis (AP) with the magnitude of lipase elevation in Emergency Department (ED) patients., Methods: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 509 consecutive patients presenting from 9/1/13-8/31/15 to a large academic ED with serum lipase levels ≥3× the upper limit of normal (ULN) (≥180 U/L). Patients were excluded if they did not have imaging (n = 131) or had a history of trauma, abdominal metastases, altered mental status, or transfer from an outside hospital (n = 190); the final study population was 188 patients. Imaging exams were retrospectively evaluated, and a consensus opinion of two subspecialty-trained abdominal radiologists was used to diagnose AP. Primary outcome was presence of imaging features of AP stratified by lipase level (≥3×-10× ULN and > 10× ULN). Secondary outcome was rate of discordant consensus evaluation compared to original radiologist's report., Results: 25.0% of patients (47/188) had imaging features of AP. When lipase was >10× ULN (n = 94), patients were more likely to have imaging features of AP (34%) vs. those with mild elevation (16%) (p = 0.0042). There was moderately strong correlation between lipase level and presence of imaging features of AP (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Consensus review of CT and MRI images was discordant with the original report in 14.9% (28/188) of cases., Conclusion: Prevalence of imaging signs of AP in an ED population with lipase ≥3× ULN undergoing imaging is low. However, the probability of imaging features of AP increases as lipase value increases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interventions designed to limit the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having profound effects on the delivery of health care, but data showing the impact on oncology clinical trial enrollment, treatment, and monitoring are limited. We prospectively tracked relevant data from oncology clinical trials at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, including the number of open trials, new patient enrollments, in-person and virtual patient visits, dispensed investigational infusions, dispensed or shipped oral investigational agents, research biopsies, and blood samples. We ascertained why patients came off trials and determined on-site clinical research staffing levels. We used 2-sided Wilcoxon rank sum tests to assess the statistical significance of the reported changes. Nearly all patients on interventional treatment trials were maintained, and new enrollments continued at just under one-half the prepandemic rate. The median number of investigational prescriptions shipped to patients increased from 0 to 74 (range = 22-107) per week from March to June 2020. The median number of telemedicine appointments increased from 0 to 107 (range = 33-267) per week from March to June 2020. Research biopsies and blood collections decreased dramatically after Dana-Farber Cancer Institute implemented COVID-19-related policies in March 2020. The number of research nurses and clinical research coordinators on site also decreased after March 2020. Substantial changes were required to safely continue clinical research during the pandemic, yet we observed no increases in serious adverse events or major violations related to drug dosing. Lessons learned from adapting research practices during COVID-19 can inform industry sponsors and governmental agencies to consider altering practices to increase operational efficiency and convenience for patients., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Incidentally detected adrenal nodules are common, and prevalence increases with patient age. Although most are benign, it is important for the radiologist to be able to accurately determine which nodules require further testing and which are safely left alone. The American College of Radiology incidental adrenal White Paper provides a structured algorithm based on expert consensus for management of incidental adrenal nodules. If further diagnostic testing is indicated, adrenal computed tomography is the most appropriate test in patients for nodules less than 4 cm. In addition to imaging, biochemical testing and endocrinology referral is warranted to exclude a functioning mass., Competing Interests: Disclosure Authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare breast imaging subspecialists' follow-up recommendations for incidental liver lesions (ILLs) on breast MRI with abdominal subspecialty radiologists' opinions informed by best-practice recommendations., Methods: In this retrospective study at an academic medical center, natural language processing identified reports with ILLs among 2,181 breast MRI studies completed in 2015. Electronic health record and radiology report reviews abstracted malignancy presence or absence, prior imaging, and breast subspecialists' recommendations regarding ILLs for random sets of 30 patients: ILLs with follow-up recommendations, ILLs without recommendations, and without ILLs. Two abdominal radiologists evaluated MRI liver findings and offered follow-up recommendations in consensus. The primary outcome was agreement between breast and abdominal subspecialists in patients with ILL follow-up recommendations compared with those without (χ 2 analysis). Secondary outcomes were agreement between subspecialists when ILLs were reported and referring clinicians' adherence to follow-up recommendations., Results: ILLs were identified in 11.3% of breast MRI reports (247 of 2,181); breast subspecialists made follow-up recommendations in 12% of them (30 of 247). Abdominal subspecialists agreed with breast subspecialists when ILLs required no follow-up (29 of 30 cases) but disagreed with 28 of 30 breast subspecialists' follow-up recommendations (agreement proportion 29 of 30 versus 2 of 30, P < .0001). Subspecialists agreed in 93% of cases (28 of 30) when breast imagers reported no ILLs. Overall, 16 of 30 breast subspecialists' follow-up recommendations were performed; ILLs were benign in 15., Conclusions: Abdominal subspecialists disagreed frequently with breast subspecialists regarding follow-up recommendations for ILLs on breast MRI. Abdominal subspecialty consultation or embedding liver imaging decision support in breast imaging reporting workflow may reduce unnecessary imaging and improve care. Improvement opportunities may exist in other cross-subspecialty interpretation workflows., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To review the current evidence and guidelines for diagnosis and management of incidental adrenal masses with a focus on the recent changes made by the American College of Radiology (ACR) Incidental Findings Committee., Conclusion: Incidentally detected adrenal nodules are a commonly encountered finding estimated to occur in 5-7% of the adult population. By following current recommendations, radiologists can improve patient care by efficiently determining which masses require further diagnostic testing and which masses can be considered benign and not require further follow-up.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess impact of a report template quality improvement (QI) initiative on use of preferred phrases for communicating normal findings in structured abdominal CT and MRI reports. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective QI initiative, designed to decrease use of equivocal phrases and increase use of preferred and acceptable phrases (defined by multidisciplinary experts including patient advocates) in radiology reports, was performed in an academic medical center with over 800,000 annual radiologic examinations and was exempt from institutional review board approval. The intervention populated the preferred term "normal" (default) and acceptable specified pertinent negative phrases (pick-list option) when describing abdominal organ subheadings (liver, pancreas, spleen, adrenal glands, kidneys) within the "Findings" heading of abdominal CT and MRI report templates. We tabulated frequencies of the term "normal", specified pertinent negatives, and equivocal phrases in 21,629 reports before (June 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018) and 23,051 reports after (April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018) the intervention using natural language processing and recorded trainee participation in report generation. We assessed intervention impact using statistical process control (SPC) charts and the Fisher exact test. RESULTS. Equivocal phrases were used less frequently in abdominal CT and MRI reports for both attending radiologists and trainees after the intervention ( p < 0.05, SPC). Use of the term "normal" increased for reports generated by attending radiologists alone but decreased for reports created with trainee participation ( p < 0.05, SPC). Frequency of pertinent negatives increased for reports with trainee participation ( p < 0.05, SPC). CONCLUSION. A QI intervention decreased use of equivocal terms and increased use of preferred and acceptable phrases when communicating normal findings in abdominal CT and MRI reports.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technologist productivity and accuracy in assigning protocols for abdominal CT and MRI examinations compared with a standard work flow whereby protocols are assigned by physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this quality improvement project at a large academic medical center, two CT technologists and two MRI technologists assigned protocols for examinations during a 15-week study period. The primary outcome measure was mean number of protocols assigned by technologists per hour. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of examinations with protocols assigned by technologists and rate of filing of quality assurance reports for protocols completed by technologists. A two-tailed t test was used to compare mean number of protocols; a chi-square test was used to compare proportions between CT and MRI. RESULTS. The mean number of protocols assigned by technologists per hour was not different between CT and MRI (CT, 22/h; MRI, 19/h; p = 0.28). CT and MRI technologist protocols accounted for 1650 of 4867 (33.9%) CT examinations (range, 23-275 per week) and 569 of 2388 (23.8%) MRI examinations (range, 0-95 per week) ( p < 0.001). Radiologist quality assurance reports on inaccurate protocols were rare: three for CT (3/1650 [0.18%]), five for MRI (5/569 [0.88%]) ( p = 0.017). A retrospective review of randomly selected CT and MRI protocols revealed no errors (80/80 correct). No patients were called back for repeat imaging due to protocol error. CONCLUSION. Technologists can efficiently and accurately assign protocols for abdominal CT and MRI examinations at an academic medical center, leading to increased radiologist time spent on other value-added activities.

OBJECTIVE. Variability in reports of the same imaging study performed at the same institution may be confusing to referrers and patients, hindering results communication. The purpose of this study was to introduce a quality improvement initiative aimed at reducing variation in radiology report templates at a large academic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The quality improvement initiative was undertaken at a large multisite, multidivision academic radiology practice performing more than 820,000 radiologic examinations annually. A project charter defined the goals, scope, and personnel of the initiative and an escalation pathway for conflict resolution. Standard requirements for templates were initially developed. From September 2017 to May 2018, an oversight committee (24 organ system and modality-based work groups with representatives from nine subspecialty divisions) reviewed and harmonized all institutional radiology report templates across the enterprise irrespective of the imaging site or division that interpreted the study. The primary outcome measure was percentage reduction in report templates after harmonization. The secondary outcome measure was monthly adherence to harmonized templates for 9 months after implementation assessed by manual review of 40 randomly selected reports per month. The paired t test was used to assess template reduction, and the chi-square trend test was used to study trend in adherence to harmonized templates. RESULTS. Among 19,687 total templates at baseline, 597 harmonized templates remained after harmonization ( p < 0.001). There was variation in template reduction by work group (multiple p < 0.05; reduction range, 79.2-99.3%). Radiologist adherence to harmonized templates ranged from 88.0% to 100%, unchanged in the 9 months after implementation ( p = 0.23, chi-square trend). CONCLUSION. A radiology report harmonization initiative reduced 97.0% of report templates with a sustained high degree of adherence to harmonized templates after implementation at a large multisite multidivision academic radiology practice.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to improve the geometric fidelity and spatial resolution of multi-b diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate., Materials and Methods: An accelerated segmented diffusion imaging sequence was developed and evaluated in 25 patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the prostate. A reduced field of view was acquired using an endorectal coil. The number of sampled diffusion weightings, or b-factors, was increased to allow estimation of tissue perfusion based on the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model. Apparent diffusion coefficients measured with the proposed segmented method were compared with those obtained with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI)., Results: Compared with single-shot EPI, the segmented method resulted in faster acquisition with 2-fold improvement in spatial resolution and a greater than 3-fold improvement in geometric fidelity. Apparent diffusion coefficient values measured with the novel sequence demonstrated excellent agreement with those obtained from the conventional scan (R = 0.91 for bmax = 500 s/mm and R = 0.89 for bmax = 1400 s/mm). The IVIM perfusion fraction was 4.0% ± 2.7% for normal peripheral zone, 6.6% ± 3.6% for normal transition zone, and 4.4% ± 2.9% for suspected tumor lesions., Conclusions: The proposed accelerated segmented prostate diffusion imaging sequence achieved improvements in both spatial resolution and geometric fidelity, along with concurrent quantification of IVIM perfusion.

Objective: Assess information integrity (concordance and completeness of documented exam indications from the electronic health record [EHR] imaging order requisition, compared to EHR provider notes), and assess potential impact of indication inaccuracies on exam planning and interpretation., Methods: This retrospective study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. There were 139 MRI lumbar spine (LS-MRI) and 176 CT abdomen/pelvis orders performed 4/1/2016-5/31/2016 randomly selected and reviewed by 4 radiologists for concordance and completeness of relevant exam indications in order requisitions compared to provider notes, and potential impact of indication inaccuracies on exam planning and interpretation. Forty each LS-MRI and CT abdomen/pelvis were re-reviewed to assess kappa agreement., Results: Requisition indications were more likely to be incomplete (256/315, 81%) than discordant (133/315, 42%) compared to provider notes (p < 0.0001). Potential impact of discrepancy between clinical information in requisitions and provider notes was higher for radiologist's interpretation than for exam planning (135/315, 43%, vs 25/315, 8%, p < 0.0001). Agreement among radiologists for concordance, completeness, and potential impact was moderate to strong (Kappa 0.66-0.89). Indications in EHR order requisitions are frequently incomplete or discordant compared to physician notes, potentially impacting imaging exam planning, interpretation and accurate diagnosis. Such inaccuracies could also diminish the relevance of clinical decision support alerts if based on information in order requisitions., Conclusions: Improved availability of relevant documented clinical information within EHR imaging requisition is necessary for optimal exam planning and interpretation.

Purpose: To reduce CT and MRI protocol variation across a multisite radiology practice at an academic medical center so that patients with similar clinical presentations are examined the same way., Materials and Methods: This study was performed at a large academic radiology practice performing ∼800,000 radiology examinations annually. To diminish variability across the enterprise (2 general radiology divisions; 10 subspecialty imaging divisions), a Harmonization Oversight Committee was created and tasked with ensuring patients with similar clinical presentations undergo the same CT or MRI protocol, regardless of where they are imaged. A process for decision making and conflict resolution was established, supported by the department chair. Primary outcome measure was standardization of CT and MRI protocols across all sites. Secondary outcome was percent reduction of CT and MRI protocols postharmonization., Results: Over the 5-month harmonization process, most conflicts arose for abdominal imaging protocols because they are performed in four distinct subspecialty divisions, but all were addressed effectively through the conflict resolution process. Overall, there was a 31% reduction in the total number of CT and MRI protocols (before harmonization 481, after harmonization 331). There was significant variation in reduction of protocols per workgroup (multiple P values; range <.0001 to .9) with largest reduction in workgroups that overlapped multiple divisions., Conclusion: A structured, organ system- and consensus-based quality improvement process with unambiguous decision-making and conflict resolution processes can be used to harmonize imaging protocols across complex, matrixed, multisite radiology practices so that patients with similar clinical presentations are imaged with the same imaging protocol., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare diagnostic performance of PI-RADSv2 with ADC parameters to identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) and to determine the impact of csPC definitions on diagnostic performance of ADC and PI-RADSv2., Methods: We retrospectively identified treatment-naïve pathology-proven peripheral zone PC patients who underwent 3T prostate MRI, using high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging from 2011 to 2015. Using 3D slicer, areas of suspected tumor (T) and normal tissue (N) on ADC (b = 0, 1400) were outlined volumetrically. Mean ADC T , mean ADC N , ADC ratio (ADC T /ADC N ) were calculated. PI-RADSv2 was assigned. Three csPC definitions were used: (A) Gleason score (GS) ≥ 4 + 3; (B) GS ≥ 3 + 4; (C) MRI-based tumor volume >0.5 cc. Performances of ADC parameters and PI-RADSv2 in identifying csPC were measured using nonparametric comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves using the area under the curve (AUC)., Results: Eighty five cases met eligibility requirements. Diagnostic performances (AUC) in identifying csPC using three definitions were: (A) ADC T (0.83) was higher than PI-RADSv2 (0.65, p = 0.006); (B) ADC T (0.86) was higher than ADC ratio (0.68, p < 0.001), and PI-RADSv2 (0.70, p = 0.04); (C) PI-RADSv2 (0.73) performed better than ADC ratio (0.56, p = 0.02). ADC T performance was higher when csPC was defined by A or B versus C (p = 0.038 and p = 0.01, respectively). ADC ratio performed better when csPC was defined by A versus C (p = 0.01). PI-RADSv2 performance was not affected by csPC definition., Conclusions: When csPC was defined by GS, ADC parameters provided better csPC discrimination than PI-RADSv2, with ADC T providing best result. When csPC was defined by MRI-calculated volume, PI-RADSv2 provided better discrimination than ADC ratio . csPC definition did not affect PI-RADSv2 diagnostic performance.

Purpose: To determine test characteristics of CT urography for detecting bladder cancer in patients with hematuria and those undergoing surveillance, and to analyze reasons for false-positive and false-negative results., Methods: A HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective review of reports from 1623 CT urograms between 10/2010 and 12/31/2013 was performed. 710 examinations for hematuria or bladder cancer history were compared to cystoscopy performed within 6 months. Reference standard was surgical pathology or 1-year minimum clinical follow-up. False-positive and false-negative examinations were reviewed to determine reasons for errors., Results: Ninety-five bladder cancers were detected. CT urography accuracy: was 91.5% (650/710), sensitivity 86.3% (82/95), specificity 92.4% (568/615), positive predictive value 63.6% (82/129), and negative predictive value was 97.8% (568/581). Of 43 false positives, the majority of interpretation errors were due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 12), trabeculated bladder (n = 9), and treatment changes (n = 8). Other causes include blood clots, mistaken normal anatomy, infectious/inflammatory changes, or had no cystoscopic correlate. Of 13 false negatives, 11 were due to technique, one to a large urinary residual, one to artifact. There were no errors in perception., Conclusion: CT urography is an accurate test for diagnosing bladder cancer; however, in protocols relying predominantly on excretory phase images, overall sensitivity remains insufficient to obviate cystoscopy. Awareness of bladder cancer mimics may reduce false-positive results. Improvements in CTU technique may reduce false-negative results.

Objective: The purpose of this article is to report our intermediate to long-term outcomes with image-guided percutaneous hepatic tumor cryoablation and to evaluate its technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression, and adverse event rate., Materials and Methods: Between 1998 and 2014, 299 hepatic tumors (243 metastases and 56 primary tumors; mean diameter, 2.5 cm; median diameter, 2.2 cm; range, 0.3-7.8 cm) in 186 patients (95 women; mean age, 60.9 years; range, 29-88 years) underwent cryoablation during 236 procedures using CT (n = 126), MRI (n = 100), or PET/CT (n = 10) guidance. Technical success, technique efficacy at 3 months, local tumor progression (mean follow-up, 2.5 years; range, 2 months to 14.6 years), and adverse event rates were calculated., Results: The technical success rate was 94.6% (279/295). The technique efficacy rate was 89.5% (231/258) and was greater for tumors smaller than 4 cm (93.4%; 213/228) than for larger tumors (60.0%; 18/30) (p < 0.0001). Local tumor progression occurred in 23.3% (60/258) of tumors and was significantly more common after the treatment of tumors 4 cm or larger (63.3%; 19/30) compared with smaller tumors (18.0%; 41/228) (p < 0.0001). Adverse events followed 33.8% (80/236) of procedures and were grade 3-5 in 10.6% (25/236) of cases. Grade 3 or greater adverse events more commonly followed the treatment of larger tumors (19.5%; 8/41) compared with smaller tumors (8.7%; 17/195) (p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of hepatic tumors is efficacious; however, tumors smaller than 4 cm are more likely to be treated successfully and without an adverse event.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the interobserver agreement of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) for diagnosing prostate cancer using in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy as the reference standard., Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine patients underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy between January 21, 2010, and August 21, 2013, and underwent diagnostic multiparametric MRI 6 months or less before biopsy. A single index lesion per patient was selected after retrospective review of MR images. Three fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists (with 1-11 years' experience) blinded to clinical information interpreted all studies according to PI-RADSv2. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen kappa statistics., Results: Thirty-eight lesions were in the peripheral zone and 21 were in the transition zone. Cancer was diagnosed in 26 patients (44%). Overall PI-RADS scores were higher for all biopsy-positive lesions (mean ± SD, 3.9 ± 1.1) than for biopsy-negative lesions (3.1 ± 1.0; p < 0.0001) and for clinically significant lesions (4.2 ± 1.0) than for clinically insignificant lesions (3.1 ± 1.0; p < 0.0001). Overall suspicion score interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.45). There was moderate interobserver agreement among overall PI-RADS scores in the peripheral zone (κ = 0.46) and fair agreement in the transition zone (κ = 0.36)., Conclusion: PI-RADSv2 scores were higher in the biopsy-positive group. PI-RADSv2 showed moderate interobserver agreement among abdominal radiologists with no prior experience using the scoring system.

Objective: To determine if tumor cell density and percentage of Gleason pattern within an outlined volumetric tumor region of interest (TROI) on whole-mount pathology (WMP) correlate with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on corresponding TROIs outlined on pre-operative MRI., Methods: Men with biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma undergoing multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) prior to prostatectomy were consented to this prospective study. WMP and mpMRI images were viewed using 3D Slicer and each TROI from WMP was contoured on the high b-value ADC maps (b0, 1400). For each TROI outlined on WMP, TCD (tumor cell density) and the percentage of Gleason pattern 3, 4, and 5 were recorded. The ADC mean , ADC 10th percentile , ADC 90th percentile , and ADC ratio were also calculated in each case from the ADC maps using 3D Slicer., Results: Nineteen patients with 21 tumors were included in this study. ADC mean values for TROIs were 944.8 ± 327.4 vs. 1329.9 ± 201.6 mm 2 /s for adjacent non-neoplastic prostate tissue (p < 0.001). ADC mean , ADC 10th percentile , and ADC ratio values for higher grade tumors were lower than those of lower grade tumors (mean 809.71 and 1176.34 mm 2 /s, p = 0.014; 10th percentile 613.83 and 1018.14 mm 2 /s, p = 0.009; ratio 0.60 and 0.94, p = 0.005). TCD and ADC mean (ρ = -0.61, p = 0.005) and TCD and ADC 10th percentile (ρ = -0.56, p = 0.01) were negatively correlated. No correlation was observed between percentage of Gleason pattern and ADC values., Conclusion: DWI MRI can characterize focal prostate cancer using ADC ratio , ADC 10th percentile , and ADC mean , which correlate with pathological tumor cell density.

The most recent edition of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS version 2) was developed based on expert consensus of the international working group on prostate cancer. It provides the minimum acceptable technical standards for MR image acquisition and suggests a structured method for multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) reporting. T1-weighted, T2-weighted (T2W), diffusion-weighted (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging are the suggested sequences to include in mpMRI. The PI-RADS version 2 scoring system enables the reader to assess and rate all focal lesions detected at mpMRI to determine the likelihood of a clinically significant cancer. According to PI-RADS v2, a lesion with a Gleason score ≥7, volume >0.5 cc, or extraprostatic extension is considered clinically significant. PI-RADS v2 uses the concept of a dominant MR sequence based on zonal location of the lesion rather than summing each component score, as was the case in version 1. The dominant sequence in the peripheral zone is DWI and the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, with a secondary role for DCE in equivocal cases (PI-RADS score 3). For lesions in the transition zone, T2W images are the dominant sequence with DWI/ADC images playing a supporting role in the case of an equivocal lesion., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rationale and Objectives: To implement a preprocedural checklist in gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) fluoroscopy suites to assist radiology residents in performing studies with optimal fluoroscopic technique with a goal to lower radiation dose delivered to patients and operators., Materials and Methods: We introduced a preprocedural checklist in the form of a mnemonic to first-year resident fluoroscopy operators. The checklist was augmented by teaching sessions at the fluoroscopy tower. Fluoroscopy time (FT) was collected for GI/GU fluoroscopy studies performed by first-year residents who did not use the checklist (year 1) and compared with FT from first-year residents who used the checklist for one full academic year (year 2). Residents in both groups were surveyed to assess their knowledge of radiation safety at the end of their respective radiology 1 (R1) academic years., Results: A total of 778 examinations were analyzed from year 1, and 941 total examinations from year 2. After implementation of the checklist, mean FT for all studies decreased by 41.1 seconds (P < .0001) in year 2 residents. Multivariate linear regression confirmed that year of examination was the strongest independent predictor of FT when other covariates such as resident age, gender, and experience and patient age and gender were included. Radiation safety knowledge was similar in both groups but self-reported confidence in safe fluoroscopy tower operation increased slightly in year 2 (P = .144)., Conclusions: A visual preprocedural radiation safety checklist in GI/GU fluoroscopy was associated with a reduction in mean FT and may contribute to a culture of radiation safety awareness., (Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine whether focal peripheral zone enhancement on routine venous-phase CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: IRB approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Forty-three patients with higher-grade prostate cancer (≥Gleason 4 + 3) and 96 with histology-confirmed lower-grade (≤Gleason 3 + 4 [n = 47]) or absent (n = 49) prostate cancer imaged with venous-phase CT comprised the study population. CT images were reviewed by ten blinded radiologists (5 attendings, 5 residents) who scored peripheral zone enhancement on a scale of 1 (benign) to 5 (malignant). Mass-like peripheral zone enhancement was considered malignant. Likelihood ratios (LR) and specificities were calculated. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted., Results: Scores of "5" were strongly predictive of higher-grade prostate cancer (pooled LR+ 9.6 [95% CI 5.8-15.8]) with rare false positives (pooled specificity: 0.98 [942/960, 95% CI 0.98-0.99]; all 10 readers had specificity ≥95%). Attending scores of "5" were more predictive than resident scores of "5" (LR+: 14.7 [95% CI 5.8-37.2] vs. 7.6 [95% CI 4.2-13.7]) with similar specificity (0.99 [475/480, 95% CI 0.98-1.00] vs. 0.97 [467/480, 95% CI 0.96-0.99]). Significant predictors of an assigned score of "5" included presence of a peripheral zone mass (p < 0.0001), larger size (p < 0.0001), and less reader experience (p = 0.0008). Significant predictors of higher-grade prostate cancer included presence of a peripheral zone mass (p = 0.0002) and larger size (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Focal mass-like peripheral zone enhancement on routine venous-phase CT is specific and predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate stone detection, assessment of secondary signs of stone disease, and diagnostic confidence utilizing submillisievert CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in a North American population with diverse body habitus., Materials and Methods: Fifty-two adults underwent stone CT using a split-dose protocol; weight-based projected volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were divided into two separate acquisitions at 80% and 20% dose levels. Images were reconstructed with MBIR. Five blinded readers counted stones in three size categories and rated "overall diagnostic confidence" and "detectability of secondary signs of stone disease" on a 0-4 scale at both dose levels. Effective dose (ED) in mSv was calculated as DLP multiplied by conversion coefficient, k, equal to 0.017., Results: Mean ED (80%, 3.90±1.44 mSv; vs 20%, 0.97±0.34 mSv [p<0.001]) and number of stones detected (80%, 193.6±25.0; vs 20%, 154.4±15.4 [p=0.03]) were higher in scans at 80% dose level. Intrareader correlation between scans at 80% and 20% dose levels was excellent (0.83-0.97). With 80% scans as reference standard, mean sensitivity and specificity at 20% varied with stone size (<3 mm, 74% and 77%; ≥3 mm, 92% and 82%). The 20% scans scored lower than 80% scans in diagnostic confidence (2.46±0.50; vs 3.21±0.36 [p<0.005]) and detectability of secondary signs (2.41±0.39; vs 3.19±0.29 [p<0.005])., Conclusion: Aggressively dose-reduced (~1 mSv) MBIR scans detected most urinary tract stones of 3 mm or larger but underperformed the low-dose reference standard (3-4 mSv) scans in small (<3 mm) stone detection and diagnostic confidence.

Objective: The purpose of this article is to evaluate single-source dual-energy CT (DECT) for distinguishing benign and indeterminate adrenal nodules, with attention to the effects of phase of IV contrast enhancement., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review revealed 273 contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT examinations from November 2009 through March 2012. Fifty adrenal nodules 0.8 cm or larger were identified in 41 patients (22 women and 19 men; average age, 66 years; age range, 36-88 years). CT postprocessing and measurements were independently performed by two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) for each nodule, as follows: attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on true unenhanced images; contrast-enhanced attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on monochromatic spectral images at 40, 75, and 140 keV; and contrast-enhanced material density (in milligrams per milliliter) on virtual unenhanced images. Nodules were classified as benign (< 10 HU) and indeterminate (≥ 10 HU) according to true unenhanced images., Results: Interreader agreement regarding benign and indeterminate nodules was high (κ = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0). At 140 keV, the attenuation of benign nodules was significantly lower (reader 1, 7.0 ± 12.5 HU; reader 2, 7.8 ± 9.2 HU) than that of indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 15.7 ± 20.5 HU [p = 0.004]; reader 2, 17.5 ± 13.4 HU [p < 0.0001]). On virtual unenhanced images, benign nodules had significantly lower material density (reader 1, 992.4 ± 9.9 mg/mL; reader 2, 992.7 ± 9.6 mg/mL) than did indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 1001.1 ± 20.5 mg/mL [p = 0.038]; reader 2, 1007.6 ± 13.4 mg/mL [p < 0.0001])., Conclusion: DECT tools can mathematically subtract iodine or minimize its effects in high-energy reconstructions, approximating unenhanced imaging and potentially reducing the need for additional studies to triage adrenal nodules detected on contrast-enhanced DECT examinations.

Purpose: To determine for expert and novice radiologists repeatability of major diagnostic features and scoring systems (ie, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System [LI-RADS], Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network [OPTN], and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [AASLD]) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging., Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study. The LI-RADS discussed in this article refers to version 2013.1. Ten blinded readers reviewed 100 liver MR imaging studies that demonstrated observations preliminarily assigned LI-RADS scores of LR1-LR5. Diameter and major HCC features (arterial hyperenhancement, washout appearance, pseudocapsule) were recorded for each observation. LI-RADS, OPTN, and AASLD scores were assigned. Interreader agreement was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients and κ statistics. Scoring rates were compared by using McNemar test., Results: Overall interreader agreement was substantial for arterial hyperenhancement (0.67 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.65, 0.69]), moderate for washout appearance (0.48 [95%CI: 0.46, 0.50]), moderate for pseudocapsule (0.52 [95% CI: 050, 0.54]), fair for LI-RADS (0.35 [95% CI: 0.34, 0.37]), fair for AASLD (0.39 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.42]), and moderate for OPTN (0.53 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.56]). Agreement for measured diameter was almost perfect (range, 0.95-0.97). There was substantial agreement for most scores consistent with HCC. Experts agreed significantly more than did novices and were significantly more likely than were novices to assign a diagnosis of HCC (P < .001)., Conclusion: Two of three major features for HCC (washout appearance and pseudocapsule) have only moderate interreader agreement. Experts and novices who assigned scores consistent with HCC had substantial but not perfect agreement. Expert agreement is substantial for OPTN, but moderate for LI-RADS and AASLD. Novices were less consistent and less likely to diagnose HCC than were experts., (© RSNA, 2014.)

Ultrasound (US) is an extremely useful diagnostic imaging modality because of its real-time capability, noninvasiveness, portability, and relatively low cost. It carries none of the potential risks of ionizing radiation exposure or intravenous contrast administration. For these reasons, numerous medical specialties now rely on US not only for diagnosis and guidance for procedures, but also as an extension of the physical examination. In addition, many medical school educators recognize the usefulness of this technique as an aid to teaching anatomy, physiology, pathology, and physical diagnosis. Radiologists are especially interested in teaching medical students the appropriate use of US in clinical practice. Educators who recognize the power of this tool have sought to incorporate it into the medical school curriculum. The basic question that educators should ask themselves is: "What should a student graduating from medical school know about US?" To aid them in answering this question, US specialists from the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and the Alliance of Medical School Educators in Radiology have collaborated in the design of a US curriculum for medical students. The implementation of such a curriculum will vary from institution to institution, depending on the resources of the medical school and space in the overall curriculum. Two different examples of how US can be incorporated vertically or horizontally into a curriculum are described, along with an explanation as to how this curriculum satisfies the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies, modified for the education of our future physicians.