Search

Martin Koci is perhaps one of the most recent exponents of what has been called the "theological turn" of contemporary phenomenology. Koci presents a reading from a theology that resorts to phenomenology to try to give an account of a Christianity after Christendom. Although the reference to Kierkegaard is inescapable, Koci alludes, above all, to the implications of the experience of Christianity in a postmodern era. Or, more specifically: a post-Christian era. To carry out his task, the Czech theologian establishes a dialogue with one of his most relevant compatriots of the last century: Jan Patočka. In his most recent text, Christianity after Christendom: Heretical Perspectives in Philosophical Theology, Koci expands his dialogue with Patočka by bringing into the conversation a series of philosophers, all known for their heterodox or "heretical" positions in relation to Christianity. Among these are Jean-Luc Nancy, Gianni Vattimo, John D. Caputo, and Richard Kearney. Together with each of these authors, Koci takes on the challenge of asking "the obvious question, but which has largely been neglected: what comes after the end of Christianity?". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Martin Koci es quizás uno de los exponentes más recientes de lo que ha sido denominado el “giro teológico” de la fenomenología contemporánea. Koci presenta una lectura desde una teología que recurre a la fenomenología para intentar dar razón de un Cristianismo posterior a la cristiandad. Aunque la referencia a Kierkegaard sea ineludible, Koci alude, sobre todo, a las implicaciones que supone la vivencia del Cristianismo en una época posmoderna. O, dicho más específicamente: una época post-cristiana. Para llevar a cabo su tarea, el teólogo checo establece un diálogo con uno de sus compatriotas más relevantes del siglo pasado: Jan Patočka. En su texto más reciente, Christianity after Christendom: Heretical Perspectives in Philosophical Theology, Koci amplía su diálogo con Patočka haciendo partícipes en la conversación a una serie de filósofos, conocidos todos por sus posturas heterodoxas o “heréticas” en lo que se refiere al Cristianismo. Entre estos se encuentran Jean-Luc Nancy, Gianni Vattimo, John D. Caputo y Richard Kearney. Junto con cada uno de estos autores, Koci asume el reto de hacer “la pregunta obvia, pero que en gran medida ha sido descuidada: ¿qué viene después del fin del Cristianismo?”.

Born into a pieds-noir family in Algeria in the first part of the 20th century, Pierre Claverie (1938–1996) realizes that he lived in a colonial bubble, completely ignoring the Algerian and Muslim realities. This "prise de conscience" will constitute the beginning of a deep mystical experience, a true process of "spiritual enlightenment" through which Claverie will try to re-establish himself in the lost meeting of his youth when he used to live in his "Western and Catholic bubble". His theological path will also be an institutional one: he will become a Dominican monk and Catholic bishop of Orano. Inevitably, his desire to spiritually encounter the Algerian reality in its Muslim identity will make Pierre Claverie reflect on the tension present in the paradox of the concept of religious truth (absolutely unique and/or multiple?). His reflection on the uniqueness/pluralism of religious truth represents a model of post-conciliar theological understanding that is worth examining and that supports a very current approach in today's religious and social world: understanding/accepting the truth of the other without the impression of betraying one's own truth. This study aims to deepen the mystical theological reflection of Bishop Pierre Claverie, considered a martyr in the Catholic Church, with regards to the concept of religious truth. It also to tries to understand how this reflection fits into the Catholic theological line inaugurated by the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The interrogation of the problematic character of established traditions has become an increasingly dominant feature of contemporary political and social discourse. Gadamer's discussion of tradition takes on an often-unacknowledged utility in light of these discussions by both observing the subtle ways in which tradition persists even in times of social change while also placing an emphasis on the volitional (hence, risky and contingent) character of engagements with tradition. Gadamer's approach allows for a fidelity to tradition that nonetheless allows for a critical, emancipatory engagement with it, a precursor to the more explicitly political projects of hermeneutic thinkers such as Luigi Pareyson and Gianni Vattimo. This hermeneutic lineage offers our modern age a chance to embrace a new and more authentic relationship with the traditions in which we always-already find ourselves situated by giving us the opportunity to make those traditions speak to the challenges of our tumultuous present.

This contribution thematizes the Gadamerian legacy in the context of the Italian philosophical debate, attempting to understand whether this debate can contribute to rethink the vitality of the hermeneutic tradition and the future of its possible developments. When, in 1972, Gianni Vattimo, one of the key figures in contemporary Italian thought, published his seminal translation of Truth and Method, Gadamerian themes began to circulate, in Italy, based on a specific interpretation: The Italian hermeneutic debate received the project of Truth and Method as a kind of philosophical defense of the humanistic tradition. As the inventor of the "weak thought," Vattimo defended the idea that the 'weakening' of the project of the world's scientific rationalization could enhance other experiences related to truth, namely humanistic, artistic, literary, and religious ones. Just like then, the triumph of scientific rationality and calculative thinking places contemporary hermeneutics in front of a daunting task. One must ask whether hermeneutics, in order to remain faithful to the Gadamerian project, should remain essentially a project of metatheoretical foundations of textual interpretation, endowed with a historically and linguistically informed approach, or it should rather radically rethink its relationship to the problem of 'method.' To avoid this deflation of the Gadamerian tradition, one possible way forward is to orient hermeneutic research toward a 'hard' and philosophically grounded idea of objectuality/objectivity, but at the same time not methodologically sterile, that is, not flattened on the methods of the 'hard sciences'.

The aim of the text is to consider Gianni Vattimo's claim that hermeneutics needs to be more rational due to its criticised relativism and aestheticism. From this perspective, the author considers the projects proposed by Bartosz Brożek and Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, based on the assumption that the cognitive phenomena underlying the understanding of human behaviour and the resulting artefacts can be described using naturalistic methods. Finally, the question is considered whether these attempts, coming from outside the hermeneutic movement, offer hope for eliminating the flaws of hermeneutics mentioned by Vattimo, and what the prospects are for further research on this issue.

RESUMO Este texto tem como escopo mostrar a plausibilidade da tese de Gianni Vattimo, segundo a qual, a morte ou fim da arte, pensada pelo filósofo italiano como tramonto ou crepúsculo da arte, pode ser uma chance para pensar a estética filosófica na chamada condição pós-moderna. A plausibilidade dessa tese é mostrada por meio de um percurso estético-filosófico a partir das obras estéticas na língua original do autor, nas quais se evidenciam a constante dos conceitos de produção, ontologia, verdade e Verwindung com o intuito de mostrar a vocação ontológica da estética vattimiana. A pergunta que norteia as reflexões estéticas de Vattimo não tem por finalidade responder o que é a arte e, sim, qual o sentido de produzir obras artísticas na época do fim da arte. Lidas nessa perspectiva, as obras estéticas de Vattimo mostram a necessidade de iniciar toda e cada estética filosófica da aceitação do pressuposto da historicidade da arte e da necessária experiência artística porque nela, seguindo a filosofia de Heidegger, acontece a arte como posta em obra da verdade.

The following article consists in a critical exploration of the political philosophy of Gianni Vattimo exposed in the works Adiós a la Verdad, Vocación y responsabilidad del filósofo, Comunismo hermenéutico, Ecce Comu and De la realidad. The political philosophy of Vattimo of the 21st century works as a justification for totalitarianism in Latin America. Its revolutionary commitment erodes the persuasive power of its proposal at the end of the last century, the weak thought. It starts on an approach to the transformative possibilities of hermeneutics and its original circumstances. Then, the claim of philosophy is examined in its relationship with the truth and the role of the latter in politics. Finally, the disharmony between the theoretical enunciation and the political reality of Latin America is formulated, how the construction of the political thought of the Italian benefits tyranny. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Er(r)go: Teoria, Literatura, Kultura is the property of Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae is the property of Uniwerystet Kardynala Stefana Wyznskiege w Warzawie and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Chung-ying Cheng's onto-generative hermeneutical studies of the foundational philosophical texts of China and the Western philosophical traditions expand the horizon of comparative interpretative analyses. The origin of onto-generative hermeneutics is multifaceted, ranging from the Yijing 《易經》 (the Book of Changes) and the Neo-Confucian text of Zhang Zai, Ximing 《西銘》 (the Western Inscription) to the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, and to the hermeneutics of Gadamer. Building on Cheng's examination of the relation between phenomenology, hermeneutics, and the classical texts of Chinese philosophy, the present discussion begins with an exploration of the origin and the continuation of phenomenology and hermeneutics in a comparative frame of reference of Chinese and Greek texts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, I examine how Gianni Vattimo, in using the terms “weak thought” aims to promote caritas in intellectual life by converging, however paradoxically, Heideggerian Verwindung and Nietzschean nihilism with Pauline kenosis. In line with René Girard’s postulation that Christianity rejects the sacred, Vattimo classifies the idea of a transcendent divinity as Aristotelian rather than Christian, arguing that the Incarnation, as an expression of caritas and humility, is incompatible with the idea of divine transcendence. Based on this perception, Vattimo argues that Nietzsche’s dictum that “God is dead” carries the same philosophical meaning as the kenotic doctrine of the birth of God as man. Furthermore, Vattimo redefines the Heideggerian Verwindung, a subtle response rigidity in the structures of metaphysics, in terms of kenotic caritas. Vattimo’s hermeneutic work over several decades have enabled this improbable convergence of methodologies and worldviews, upon which he bases his argument that postmodernism, in its weakening of all transcendental axiomatic claims, may be understood to share the “desacralizing thrust of Christianity.”

The paper intends to introduce main points of Eco's critique of Vattimo's philosophy. It focuses on differences in their approaches and provides a closer view of one of the philosophical discussions happening at the wake of the new millennium. We focus on understanding reality and the limits of interpretation as the two key points of Eco's consideration and criticism. In 1983, Umberto Eco participated in publishing the well-known volume "weak thought", although he later no longer considered himself part of the philosophical initiative. He represents a position of minimal or negative realism. Gianni Vattimo is a proponent of the "weak thought", where reality is not introduced as stable, natural or objective. Reality does not itself speak out but needs a spokesmen or motivated interpreters. Vattimo, therefore revives Nietzsche's thought "There are no facts, only interpretations", which he deploys further in his own way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Este artigo tem como tema a democracia enquanto fundamentalismo, ou o fundamentalismo democrático. Seu objetivo principal é o reconhecimento de que o pensamento sobre a democracia pode ser, ele mesmo, fundamentalista, de modo que não só os fundamentalismos religiosos são uma ameaça à democracia contemporânea. Trata-se de uma interpretação de textos de dois filósofos contemporâneos que não costumam dialogar entre si, o italiano Gianni Vattimo e o francês Jean-Luc Nancy. A tese do ensaio é a afirmação do pensamento democrático enquanto uma forma de fundamentalismo, na medida em que ele cumpre certas condições estabelecidas pelos dois pensadores analisados. Estas condições são, na linguagem dos filósofos citados, o enquadramento da democracia sob o pensamento forte, ou a sua subsunção a um modo metafísico de pensar, de modo que se torna incapaz de autocrítica e de sua necessária reinvenção. Assim, espera-se contribuir para a construção de uma visão autocrítica da democracia mediante o diálogo com aspectos do pensamento pouco conhecidos de importantes filósofos da atualidade e também mediante o diálogo entre filosofia e teologia enquanto modos emancipatórios de saber.

In Italy for the last decade, a very interesting public debate has been conducted about artificial reproduction. An important step in this discussion was the adoption in 2004 of a special law regulating the use of the in vitro method. In 2014 the Constitutional Court cancelled the prohibition, existing in this document, of the methods of heterological artificial reproduction. A very important part of the debate in Italy are different kinds of philosophical arguments. The most interesting or very representative voices in this discussion include statements of Oriana Fallaci, Vittorio Possenti, and Gianni Vattimo.

El artículo expone, en primer lugar, las principales tesis en perspectiva hermenéuticodebolista (de pensiero debole o pensamiento débil) y también biográfica, del filósofo italiano Gianni Vattimo sobre religión, en particular la cristiana católica, a partir de su libro Creer que se cree. A continuación se presentan resumidamente varios diálogos en torno al tema habidos con otros filósofos y pensadores contemporáneos con quienes hay más coincidencias que diferencias. Entre ellos se particulariza un intercambio con José Luis L. Aranguren (1909-96) propuesto por el autor del artículo y basado en su propia investigación sobre este filósofo español.

The purpose of this article is to examine the themes present in Gianni Vattimo's Art's Claim to Truth. I argue that there is a central phenomenon that links his aesthetics to his hermeneutics: the experience of groundlessness. I consider how three aspects color this experience: the artwork's lack of foundations, the ungrounding of our world, and an element of a-rationality/irrationality indicated by the event of art as experience--i.e., as expressed in affectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article has as its theme the democracy as fundamentalism, or the democratic fundamentalism. Its main objective is the recognition that the thinking about democracy can itself be fundamentalist, implying that not only religious fundamentalisms are a threat to contemporary democracy. Its method and object are the interpretation of texts by two contemporary philosophers who do not usually talk to each other, the Italian Gianni Vattimo and the French Jean-Luc Nancy. The essay's thesis is the affirmation of democratic thinking as a form of fundamentalism, insofar as it fulfills certain conditions established by the two thinkers analyzed. These conditions are, in the language of the aforementioned philosophers, the framing of democracy under the so-called strong thought, or its subsumption to a metaphysical way of thought, so that it becomes incapable of self-criticism and its necessary reinvention. Thus, it is expected to contribute to the construction of a self-critical vision of democracy through dialogue with aspects of thought little known of important philosophers and also through the dialogue between philosophy and theology as emancipatory ways of knowing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae is the property of Uniwerystet Kardynala Stefana Wyznskiege w Warzawie and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Violence is often considered through its causes or effects, but seldom by its source. As to that, opinion is also divided. Some say that human culture is the source of violence and that love and peace can only come from 'outside'; others claim that precisely this 'outside' is the source of violence and that love can only blossom in a society that cancels all arbitrary reference to any 'outside'. These positions are articulated by, respectively, René Girard and Gianni Vattimo. This article confronts both positions and tries to learn from them, even though no scientific proof can decide between them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

W artykule zanalizowana zostaje rozwijana w horyzoncie hermeneutyki Gianniego Vattimo koncepcja doświadczenia estetycznego. Przywołane są poglądy Fryderyka Nietzschego, Martina Heideggera i Waltera Benjamina, z których Vattimo czerpał inspiracje. Rozważania koncentrują się wokół tezy głoszącej, że doświadczenie estetyczne sztuki współczesnej, powodując dezorientację i wyobcowanie, „osłabia” metafizyczny sposób myślenia, a także ugruntowane na nim „realność” i tożsamość odbiorcy. Oddziaływanie sztuki współczesnej okazuje się jednak pozytywne, gdyż daje sposobność do wykształcenia nowego rodzaju wrażliwości, związanej z otwartością na to, co różnorodne, zdarzeniowe, zmienne, inne, fragmentaryczne, kruche, niepełne i przemijające. Doświadczenie estetyczne zostaje ujęte na tle zjawisk charakterystycznych dla późnej nowoczesności. Podjęty zostaje również problem ambiwalentnej roli techniki i mass mediów w procesie „osłabiania” fikcyjnych realności.

W artykule został zaprezentowany projekt słabej pedagogiki religii, inspirowany radykalną hermeneutyką Gianniego Vattimo i kluczową dla niej kategorią kenosis („osłabiania”). Projekt ten zakłada rezygnację z doktryny preambula fidei, z ortodoksji jako mocnej ontologii, narzucającej się w arbitralnych i autorytatywnych sądach oraz apodyktycznych roszczeniach do określania i ustalania obowiązujących uniwersalnie kryteriów epistemologicznych, metafizycznych, antropologicznych czy etycznych. Praxis takiej pedagogiki wiązałoby się z hermeneutycznym w swym charakterze odkrywaniem zbawczego sensu chrześcijańskiego przesłania polegającego na wyzbywaniu się roszczeń do obiektywności oraz na sprowadzaniu kategorii prawdy z zewnątrz (doktryna) do wewnątrz (przeżywanie). Przez bardziej świadomą identyfikację z treścią tradycji, stawianie jej pytań, poszukiwanie i odnajdywanie odpowiedzi wykraczających poza przyjętą ortodoksję i dogmat podmiot odzyskiwać ma autonomię i sprawczość, ma także szansę stawać się dojrzałym i odpowiedzialnym uczestnikiem hermeneutycznej tradycji chrześcijańskiego przekazu. Formuła ta otwiera przed nim przestrzeń specyficznego „mówienia” o doświadczeniu religijnym i jego ekspresji nie tylko w ramach usankcjonowanej dziś tzw. hermeneutyki biblijnej, lecz przede wszystkim na drodze swobodnego eksperymentowania ze słowem, gestem, znakiem i symbolem religijnym, na sposób, w jaki czyni to sztuka, co w silnie zmediatyzowanej (pop)kulturze nie pozostaje bez znaczenia dla recepcji tradycji i identyfikacji z nią.

Artykuł stanowi propozycję wykorzystania interpretacyjnych narzędzi żydowskiego mesjanizmu w celu osłabienia dyskursu umacniających się na Zachodzie narodowych populizmów. Zawiera analizę oryginalnej koncepcji słabego mesjanizmu Waltera Benjamina, jej ponownego odczytania przez Gianniego Vattimo oraz pozornie polemicznej propozycji Harolda Blooma, która słabości Benjaminowskiego mesjasza zdaje się przeciwstawiać siłę mocnego poety. Nacisk położony zostaje na reinterpretacyjne otwarcie zawarte w teoriach Benjamina, Vattimo i Blooma, pozwalające znaleźć odpowiedź na wpisane w narodowy populizm triumf i powrót mitu. Słaby mesjanizm jest przedstawiony jako interpretacyjna forma oporu przed zawłaszczeniem historii i próbą jej domknięcia. W katastrofalnej kondycji współczesności można bowiem upatrywać szansy na otwarcie przed słabą myślą możliwości skutecznego rozmontowania struktur mitu.

Copyright of Journal of Shenzhen University Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences) Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Forum Pedagogiczne / Pedagogical Forum is the property of Uniwersytet Kardynala Stefana Wyszynskiego w Warszawie and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bajo Palabra: Journal of Philosophy is the property of Bajo Palabra: Journal of Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Umberto Eco's still relatively unexplored Il cimitero di Praga (2010) underscores the recurrent embrouille between truth and fiction in the literary and historiographical fields. Importantly, it also engages in the current philosophical debate on the relevance of what the Italian philosopher Maurizio Ferraris has recently defined as New Realism. This essay focuses on Eco's ethical and philosophical engagement in relation to the narratological features of the novel. By exploring the author's notion of negative realism, it suggests Eco's proposal in the novel of a 'third way', namely, of an interpretative path between postmodernism and New Realism that may envision a distinct approach to the hermeneutics of Reality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Artykuł dotyczy filozoficznej idei „myśli słabej” włoskiego filozofa postmodernistycznego, Gianniego Vattima, która może być traktowana jako sposób hermeneutycznej interpretacji faktów kulturowych, z edukacyjnymi włącznie. Słabą myśl charakteryzuje Vattimo na tle dwóch wielkich nurtów filozoficznych: dialektyki i filozofii różnicy. Jest to taki typ refleksji, który z jednej strony poszukuje dla siebie normatywnych punktów oparcia, z drugiej zaś przyznaje im prowizorycznystatus, pozbawiając się przywileju uniwersalistycznych roszczeń. Wspomniana koncepcja ukazuje związki między etyką i hermeneutyką, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem etyki otwartej kontynuacji. Podkreśla ona również możliwość osłabienia kolonizującej mocy „mocnego” (nowoczesnego i naukowego) dyskursu w pedagogice. Do prawdy (prawdy pozbawionej metafizycznego gruntu) można również dotrzeć na drodze nienaukowej, która sprzeciwia się scjentyzmowi i wiedzie przez interpretację.

En los últimos años, hemos tenido la oportunidad de conocer diversas teorías que, desde diferentes puntos de vista, certifican la «muerte del arte». La pregunta que queremos responder aquí, a partir del estudio de una de ellas, es si dichas teorías implican al mismo tiempo la pérdida de autonomía de la estética. Se trata de una pregunta crucial, pues la cuestión de la soberanía está estrechamente ligada a la disciplina desde su nacimiento, hasta el punto de que es casi imposible desligar su historia de ese relato emancipador.In recent years we have had the opportunity to know different theories that certify the «death of art» from different points of view. The question we would like to answer, paying attention to one of them, is whether these theories imply, at the same time, the loss of aesthetic autonomy. It is a crucial question because the issue of sovereignty is closely tied to the discipline since its birth, to the point that it is almost impossible to isolate the history of Aesthetics from this redemptive narrative.

Paul Ricoeur insists on some kind of philosophical agnosticism although in everyday practice he is consciously bound to Christianity. That said, his poetical approach in Biblical hermeneutics when he confronts his position with his no believing contemporaries, very clearly shows that religious dimension of man, especially in its openness to new meanings, makes the understanding more proli fi c. This opens the way for new attempts of repeated search for human need for religious dimension also at Luc Ferry and Gianni Vattimo. It is not necessary that there is a very certain form of religiosity; the important thing is openness for these questions. In this way we liberate the science, to seriously confront with religious dimension of man. This is especially important in a globalized world where religiosity on one hand can be a cause for the clash of civilizations and on the other it can be a possibility of a common search for a world ethos.

Copyright of Estudios Filosóficos is the property of Estudios Filosoficos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article examines Gianni Vattimo’s contribution to the recent ontological turn in political theory. Drawing on Nietzsche and Heidegger, Vattimo offers a ‘philosophy of history’ in which strong metaphysical claims are presented as gradually being weakened, but in which the irrationalism he thinks characteristic of many anti-foundationalist theorists is also avoided. This philosophy is said to provide for new understandings of ethical and political life which have the acceptance of pluralism as their aim. The article argues that Vattimo’s attempt to identify a position beyond metaphysics on the one hand and relativism on the other is unsuccessful, and that he ought to join in with the thoroughgoing anti-foundationalism that marks the work of writers such as Rorty and Derrida. It suggests further that awareness of our historical situation need not weaken the confidence with which our beliefs are held, and does not support any particular political programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including theorist Carl Schmitt's political theology in contrast to the ontology proposed by Martin Heidegger, the future of political theology beyond the theology of sovereignty of Schmitt and less than in the concept of Jewish messianism, and the changing structure of international law in relation to Schmitt's concept of nomos.

I propose a reading of Vattimo which focuses attention on and develops his suggestions regarding the Heideggerian meditation on technology in relation to the history of Being. In a number of texts, Vattimo takes up Heideggers analysis of the essence of modern technology as Ge-Stell, paying particular attention to those moments where he suggests that in the enframing we can catch a first glimpse of a turning in Being. In Bestand, beings begin to loose the characteristics of subject and object, preparing for the Kehre to a new epoch in the history of Being. Vattimo contends that this turn is further developed in the new information and communication technologies of which Heidegger was only dimly aware. I argue then that one of Vattimo's key contributions to post-Heideggerian hermeneutic ontology is to suggest that we may locate the turn to a new epoch in the history of Being in information, understood as a newly emergent paradigm for the way in which beings appear. However, in order for this to be further developed, Vattimo's work must be uncoupled from the focus on natural language he inherits from Heidegger and Gadamer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With Gianni Vattimos late collaborative works with Santiago Zabala, Vattimo is proving to be not only a philosopher of emancipatory hermeneutics but also one who is making his own distinct contribution to liberation philosophy. This article critically explores Vattimo's liberationist weak thought in the context of the New Materialisms. Though Vattimo's post-metaphysical hermeneutics lacks the linkage with the natural sciences and eschews the development of a political ontology, which are both characteristic of the New Materialisms, his deliberate reactivation and rehabilitation of Marx by way of Heidegger eventuates in an expressed preferential option for the poor. This animating concern with what Vattimo and Zabala term "the discharge of capitalism" restores the original animating spirit of Marx's dialectical materialism and thus makes the political dimension latent in materialist thought explicit and provides a new species of the New Materialisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vattimo's political liberalism often sits uncomfortably with his non-foundational commitments. The attempt to disentangle postmodern thought from moral relativism is seen as a disingenuous strategy: one either arbitrarily adopts liberal values or does so because it is part of our tradition, thus depending on the very metaphysical foundations which Vattimo denies to other thinkers. One answer may well be to distinguish metaphysics from ontology and show that Vattimo's justification of liberalism arises from an oscillation between Heidegger and Nietzsche. However, the following article maintains that Vattimo's justification is often not properly understood because it is peculiarly Italian, seeking a plural account of truth derived from the human being's peculiar position as the imaginative creature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]