Search

Objective: The primary purpose of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy of the novel snare assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal growing gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gastric GISTs) using external traction, and the secondary purpose was to compare the novel snare assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal GISTs with the standard laparoscopic procedure., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent novel external traction assisted endoscopic resection or laparoscopic resection for their extraluminal gastric GIST ≤5 cm in diameter., Results: A total of 111 patients (27 in the endoscopic group and 84 in the laparoscopic group) were included in this study. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter and complication rate between the two groups. The overall procedure time was slightly higher in the endoscopic group compared to the laparoscopic group (P = 0.034). However, postoperative hospitalization time (P < 0.001) and postoperative fasting time (P = 0.005) were shorter in the endoscopic group compared to the laparoscopic group., Conclusion: Snare external traction-assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal growing gastric GISTs is safe and effective, and it provides a new adjunctive method for endoscopic resection of GIST., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest 1) The scientific guarantors of this publication are Xin-guang Cao. 2) The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. 3) The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflict of interests. 4) The protocol was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (No.2022-KY-1236-001) and informed consent was waived., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Studies have demonstrated comparable outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We sought to compare outcomes among robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gastric GIST in the era of expanding minimally invasive surgery., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of adult patients with gastric GIST undergoing definitive surgery using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2020, excluding cases converted to open. Patients were stratified into minimally invasive surgery (MIS), (combined robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L)), and open (O). Hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and margin status were assessed. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes between R and L cohorts. Entropy balancing was used to adjust for intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare unadjusted 5-year survival., Results: Of the 15,022 patients (R = 10.4%, L = 44.3%, O = 45.3%), 63.2% were stage I and 70.6% underwent partial gastrectomy. MIS approach was associated with shorter hospital LOS (β: - 2.58; 95% CI: - 2.82 to - 2.33) and lower odds of 30-day (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.30-0.68) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.74) compared to O. Likelihood of R0 resection similar between groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.88-1.14). Hospital LOS (β: + 0.25; 95% CI: - 0.14-0.64), odds of 30-day (OR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.40-2.46) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.47-1.70), and rate of R0 resection (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.27) were comparable between R and L cohorts. Compared to O, MIS approach was associated with improved 5-year OS (log rank p < 0.001). Overall survival was not significantly different between R and L (log rank p = 0.44)., Conclusion: These findings suggest that MIS approach may be considered for resection of gastric GIST in select patients. Among patients receiving an MIS approach, the robotic technique can be considered an oncologically safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Synchronous rectal and prostate malignancies are rare and standard treatment guidelines have not yet been established. 1-3 Combined robotic rectal and prostate surgery represents a potentially excellent approach for managing synchronous rectal and prostate malignancies, offering the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure. 4 METHODS: A 78-year-old male with a history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes presented with 3 months of dyschezia and dysuria. Diagnostic colonoscopy revealed a submucosal mass 3 cm from the anal verge in the anterior wall of the rectum, with abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen and prostate-specific antigen levels. Pelvic computed tomography (CT) indicated indistinct boundaries between the rectal mass and the prostate, suggesting potential invasion. CT-guided biopsies confirmed a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma. After 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib mesylate and bicalutamide, significant tumor reduction was achieved. 5 Subsequently, the patient underwent simultaneous robotic sphincter-preserving rectal resection and prostatectomy, starting with the prostatectomy, followed by rectal tumor excision and ending with bowel reconstruction and vesicourethral anastomosis using a running suture technique., Results: The operation time was 220 min and the estimated blood loss was 50 mL. No surgical complications were encountered and all resected margins were free of tumor, indicating a complete excision. The patient recovered well and was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. Follow-up at 3 months showed no evidence of recurrence or functional impairments., Conclusion: Simultaneous robotic sphincter-preserving local rectal resection and prostatectomy can be feasibly and safely performed following neoadjuvant therapy in cases of synchronous rectal GIST and prostate cancer., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) present a complex clinical landscape, where precise preoperative risk assessment plays a pivotal role in guiding therapeutic decisions. Conventional methods for evaluating mitotic count, such as biopsy-based assessments, encounter challenges stemming from tumor heterogeneity and sampling biases, thereby underscoring the urgent need for innovative approaches to enhance prognostic accuracy., Objective: The primary objective of this study was to develop a robust and reliable computational tool, PROMETheus (Preoperative Mitosis Estimator Tool), aimed at refining patient stratification through the precise estimation of mitotic count in GISTs., Methods: Using advanced Bayesian network methodologies, we constructed a directed acyclic graph (DAG) integrating pertinent clinicopathological variables essential for accurate mitotic count prediction on the surgical specimen. Key parameters identified and incorporated into the model encompassed tumor size, location, mitotic count from biopsy specimens, surface area evaluated during biopsy, and tumor response to therapy, when applicable. Rigorous testing procedures, including prior predictive simulations, validation utilizing synthetic data sets were employed. Finally, the model was trained on a comprehensive cohort of real-world GIST cases (n=80), drawn from the repository of the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, with a total of 160 cases analyzed., Results: Our computational model exhibited excellent diagnostic performance on synthetic data. Different model architecture were selected based on lower deviance and robust out-of-sample predictive capabilities. Posterior predictive checks (retrodiction) further corroborated the model's accuracy. Subsequently, PROMETheus was developed. This is an intuitive tool that dynamically computes predicted mitotic count and risk assessment on surgical specimens based on tumor-specific attributes, including size, location, surface area, and biopsy-derived mitotic count, using posterior probabilities derived from the model., Conclusions: The deployment of PROMETheus represents a potential advancement in preoperative risk stratification for GISTs, offering clinicians a precise and reliable means to anticipate mitotic counts on surgical specimens and a solid base to stratify patients for clinical studies. By facilitating tailored therapeutic strategies, this innovative tool is poised to revolutionize clinical decision-making paradigms, ultimately translating into improved patient outcomes and enhanced prognostic precision in the management of GISTs., (©Salvatore Lorenzo Renne, Manuela Cammelli, Ilaria Santori, Marta Tassan-Mangina, Laura Samà, Laura Ruspi, Federico Sicoli, Piergiuseppe Colombo, Luigi Maria Terracciano, Vittorio Quagliuolo, Ferdinando Carlo Maria Cananzi. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 22.10.2024.)

Background: •Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors that most commonly occur in the stomach, small intestine and colon., Background: •Surgical R0 resection is the primary approach for localized GIST, but tumors larger than 10 cm are usually treated by open surgery., Background: •This case demonstrates the safety and feasibility of robotic resection of a giant gastric GIST., Background: •The use of the robotic platform resulted in minimal blood loss and favorable postoperative outcomes with maximum organ preservation.

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic subserosal dissection for patients with submucosal tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract., Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 16 patients who underwent ESSD. All patients were enrolled from July 2018 to Dec 2021. Parameters such as demographics, size, resection margin, complications, pathological features, procedure time and follow-up were investigated and analyzed., Results: Our study achieved 100% en bloc resection and 100% R0 resection. The most common location was the corpus with a mean tumor size of 2.78 ± 1.56 cm. The mean age, procedure time, were 53.4 ± 10.3 years, 85.31 ± 46.64 min respectively. Acocording to National Institutes of Health classification, 7 (13, 53.85%), 5 (13, 38.46%) ,and 1 (13, 7.69%) objects belonged to the very low, low, and intermediate classification, respectively. Immunohistochemistry results showed a 100% positive rate of CD34, DOG-1, CD117, and Ki67. A mean follow-up of 9.3 ± 2.5 months showed no recurrence or metastasis., Conclusions: ESSD is effective and safe surgical procedure for curative removal of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and it can be preferred for patients with no metastasis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Laparoscopic surgery has been used to treat gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has been used when subtotal resection has been difficult, which enabled resection of these tumors. In this study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent laparoscopic surgery in our hospital with the aim of reporting the surgical indications, procedures (especially for LECS), and outcomes of surgery. This study involved 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between April 2014 and March 2021. We classified the patients into two groups: laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (non-LECS group, n = 30) and LECS group (n = 25). LECS was performed in the upper stomach, in the greater curvature of the lower stomach, and in both intraluminal and intramural locations in the middle stomach. Non-LECS was selected for extraluminal and intramural tumors in the greater curvature of the upper stomach. There were no severe complications associated with the operation. There was one postoperative complication in the LECS group. The length of postoperative hospital stay did not significantly differ between the LECS and non-LECS groups. We reported the surgical procedures for gastric SMTs in our hospital. It is essential to make full use of the multiple techniques reported in this article and examine the location of the tumor to avoid excess or insufficient resection. Our review of the present case series allowed us to select the appropriate surgical approach for gastric SMTs based on the lesion location and type of development., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

An aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is an uncommon cause of gastrointestinal bleeding that requires prompt diagnosis and intervention owing to its high mortality rate. Moreover, iliac aneurysmo-colonic fistula is an exceptionally infrequent presentation. We report a unique case of a 71-year-old male presenting with hematochezia, later diagnosed with a primary fistula between a common iliac artery aneurysm and the sigmoid colon. Initially, the patient was misdiagnosed as having a gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leading to delayed and emergent surgical intervention due to massive bleeding 2 days later. This case is particularly notable for its rarity, misinterpretation of the initial diagnosis, complicated surgical procedures, and development of complications including ischemic myopathy. This case highlights the criticality of accurate diagnosis with a high index of suspicion, significance of consultation with a vascular surgeon for vascular abnormalities, and importance of considering ischemic time in the sequence of surgical treatments to ensure timely and appropriate management., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest with this respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) is a laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). It combines laparoscopic gastric resection and endoscopic techniques for local resection of gastric tumors, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), with minimal surgical margins. A conventional CLEAN-NET surgical procedure is complex, requiring careful techniques to preserve the cardia, particularly in case of nearby lesions. We describe the case of a patient who underwent a modified CLEAN-NET approach with a semi-circular seromuscular layer incision surrounding the base of the tumor, different from a circular shape seromuscular layer in the conventional CLEAN-NET: around the tumor to preserve mucosal continuity, which acts as a barrier to avoid intraoperative tumor dissemination., Case Presentation: A 43-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a gastric submucosal tumor near the cardia, detected on medical examination. The patient was diagnosed with gastric GIST based on the results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Modified CLEAN-NET was performed with a semicircular incision of the seromuscular layer on the opposite side of the cardia, making the surgical procedure simple and minimizing partial resection of the gastric wall, including the tumor, while preserving the cardia. The operative time was 147 min, preoperative blood loss volume was 3 mL, and postoperative hospital stay was 9 days. The resected specimen revealed a minimal resection of the gastric wall, including the tumor. The cardia and gastric nerves were preserved, and the postoperative food intake was good., Conclusions: The modified CLEAN-NET with semicircular seromuscular layer dissection is a simple and reliable surgical procedure for GIST near the cardia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The optimal duration of preoperative imatinib (IM) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, therapeutic effectiveness, and optimal duration of preoperative IM in patients with locally advanced gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)., Methods: The clinicopathologic data of 41 patients with locally advanced gastric GIST who received preoperative IM and underwent surgical resection from January 2014 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed., Results: After a median of 7.0 (IQR: 4.5-10) months of preoperative IM treatment, 30 patients experienced adverse events (AEs), 80% of which were grade 1/2 AEs. The mean tumor size decreased from 12.71 ± 5.34 cm to 8.26 ± 4.00 cm, with a reduction rate of 35%. Setting 8 months as the cut-off value according to the results of ROC analysis. The proportion of laparoscopic surgery was higher in patients with short-term (≤8 months) versus long-term (>8 months) preoperative IM. Compared with the subtotal/total gastrectomy group, patients in the local gastrectomy group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss, shorter length of postoperative hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications. The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 82.9% and 97.6%, and the expected 5-year RFS and OS rates were 75.6% and 90.2% respectively. RFS was better in the short-term than in the long-term preoperative IM treatment group, and it was also better in pre- plus postoperative IM treatment group than that in the preoperative IM alone group. Both univariate and multivariate COX analysis showed that a higher mitotic index and long-term preoperative IM treatment were associated with worse RFS, while postoperative IM treatment could significantly improve RFS., Conclusions: The study suggests that in patients with locally advanced gastric GIST, preoperative short-term (≤8 months) use of IM is associated with higher RFS than long-term use., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is still under debate since it might increase the risk of tumour rupture, especially in larger tumours. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in treatment and perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing resections of gastric GISTs over time., Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent wedge resection or partial gastrectomy for localized gastric GIST at five GIST reference centres between January 2009 and January 2022. To evaluate changes in treatment and perioperative outcomes over time, patients were divided into four equal periods. Perioperative outcomes were analysed separately and as a novel composite measure textbook outcome (TO)., Results: In total 385 patients were included. Patient and tumour characteristics did not change over time, except for median age (62-65-68-68 years, p = 0.002). The proportion of MIS increased (4.0%-9.8%-37.4%-53.0 %, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo ≥2; 22%-15%-11%-10 %, p = 0.146), duration of admission (6-6-5-4 days, p < 0.001) and operating time (92-94-77-73 min, p = 0.007) decreased over time while TO increased (54.0%- 52.7%-65.9%-76.0 %, p < 0.001). No change was seen in perioperative ruptures (6.0%- 3.6%-1.6%-3.0 %, p = 0.499). MIS was correlated with less CD ≥ 2 complications (p = 0.006), shorter duration of admission (p < 0.001) and more TO (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed in tumours ≤5 cm and >5 cm., Conclusion: A larger percentage of gastric GIST were treated with MIS over time. MIS was correlated with less complications, shorter duration of admission and more TO. Tumour rupture rates remained low over time., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: For gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), neoadjuvant imatinib is most often reserved for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction, multivisceral involvement, or limited metastatic disease. Whether localized gastric GISTs benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unknown. We sought to examine factors associated with NAT utilization for localized gastric GISTs and evaluate implications on survival., Methods: The National Cancer Database identified patients with localized gastric GISTs treated with NAT (2010-2020), excluding tumors extending beyond the gastric wall, located in the cardia, or with metastatic disease. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics of NAT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS)., Results: Of 7203 patients, 762 (10.6%) received NAT followed by resection. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with NAT use (<2.0 cm vs 2.0-5.0 cm [odds ratio {OR}, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.19-3.47; P = .010] vs >5 cm [OR, 16.87; 95% CI, 10.02-28.40; P < .001]). After propensity score matching, 1506 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 46.0 months vs 43.0 months for resection (P = .059), which was independently predictive of improved survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .041). Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed no survival differences for tumors <2.0 cm or from 2.0 to 5.0 cm. Median OS was higher for tumors > 5.0 cm treated with NAT (NAT, 45.4 months [IQR, 29.5-65.9] vs upfront resection, 42.3 months [IQR 26.9-62.8]) and associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .040)., Conclusion: Although patients who received NAT had improved survival, this was primarily due to tumors >5.0 cm. Expanding NAT selection criteria to include localized gastric GISTs >5.0 cm may improve outcomes and warrants investigation through clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. The New Zealand (NZ) population incidence has not previously been documented nor has the potential effect of ethnicity been reviewed. We furthermore wanted to assess the difference between those undergoing a wedge resection versus a more extensive operation which we hypothesised would correlate with recurrence and mortality., Methods: All patients (n = 103) with a GIST diagnosed and treated at Te Whatu Ora Waitematā (Auckland, New Zealand) between 2012 and 2021 are presented. Patient demographics, method of GIST detection, management approach, index surgery, histological features, use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib, follow-up, recurrence and mortality rates were analysed., Results: This paper reports the largest NZ GIST cohort to date and estimates an incidence of 17 cases per million per year. Eighty-four patients underwent surgical resection, 58 received a wedge resection and 17 received a more extensive operation. Five-year disease-free survival rates were 100% in the low/very low risk, 90% in the intermediate and 59% in the high risk groups as determined by the modified NIH criteria. Our overall 5-year GIST-specific survival rate was 83%; it was 91% in those who underwent a wedge resection and 60% in the extensive operation group. There is evidence that Māori have higher rates of GIST recurrence compared to non-Māori and are more likely to require an extensive surgical resection., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Objective: To explore the different treatment modalities for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) and their respective applicability and clinical outcomes., Methods: This is a retrospective study in which consecutive patients diagnosed with E-GIST at our hospital from January 2017 to August 2023 were included. The clinical characteristics of all the patients as well as long-term quality of life were recorded and analyzed., Results: A total of 23 (12 males, 11 females) E-GIST patients with a mean age of 56.7 ± 12.0 years were included in this study. Common symptoms, including upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, and heartburn, accounted for over 60 % of cases. Fifteen patients underwent endoscopic resection, five patients underwent surgical resection, two patients underwent surgical resection after receiving preoperative imatinib therapy, and one patient received conservative management., Conclusion: Different treatment strategies may be applied to the patients with E-GIST depending on the their clinical features. Our study provides insights into precise treatment for different patients. However, due to the rarity of the disease, it is challenging to collect a large sample size from a single center, necessitating more multicenter prospective large-scale studies., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are difficult to identify the risk level accurately without surgical pathological confirmation. The purpose of our study was to propose a noninvasive prediction method for predicting the malignant potential of GISTs preoperatively by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with gastric distention., Methods: We reviewed 47 GISTs who underwent CEUS from April 2017 to August 2023 retrospectively, all the lesions were certificated by pathology after surgery. The age of the patient, size of the lesion, shape, necrosis, calcification in the lesion, perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), peak intensity (PI), time to peak (TTP), and area under the curve (AUC) of the lesion and surrounding normal tissue were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Of the 47 GISTs, 26 were high-risk and 21 low-risk tumors respectively., Results: Compared with low-risk GISTs, high-risk GIST had faster AT (7.7s vs. 11.5s, p < 0.05), higher PI (15.2dB vs. 12.5dB, p < 0.05), and larger size (4.4 cm vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, AT, PI, and size were significant features. The corresponding regression equation In (p/(1-p)=-5.9 + 4.5 size + 4.6 PI + 4.0 AT)., Conclusion: The size, AT, and PI of the GISTs on CEUS can be used as parameters for a noninvasive risk level prediction model of GISTs. This model may help identify the different risk levels of GISTs before surgery., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background: The majority of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria (SEL-MPs) are benign in nature, although a subset may exhibit malignant characteristics. Conventional endoscopic resection techniques are time-consuming and lack efficacy for small SEL-MPs., Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR-L) following unroofing technique for small esophageal SEL-MPs., Methods: From January 2021 to September 2023, 17 patients diagnosed with esophageal SEL-MPs underwent ESMR-L following unroofing technique at the endoscopy center of Shenzhen People's Hospital. Details of clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed., Results: The mean age of the patients was 50.12 ± 12.65 years. The mean size of the tumors was 7.47 ± 2.83 mm and all cases achieved en bloc resection successfully. The average operation time was 12.2 minutes without any complications. Histopathology identified 2 Lesions (11.8%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumors at very low risk, 12 Lesions (70.6%) as leiomyoma and 3 Lesions (17.6%) as smooth muscle proliferation. No recurrence was found during the mean follow-up duration of 14.18 ± 9.62 months., Conclusion: ESMR-L following roofing technique is an effective and safe technique for management of esophageal SEL-MPs smaller than 20 mm, but it cannot ensure en bloc resection and may require further treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Currently, due to limited long-term evidence, there remains some controversy surrounding the recommended postoperative monitoring strategy for primary low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). This study recruited a total of 532 patients diagnosed with very low-risk and low-risk GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection from 2015 to 2021, including 460 very low-risk patients and 72 low-risk patients. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics of GIST patients, and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed for survival analysis. The results showed that the 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for very low-risk and low-risk patients were 98.5% and 95.9%, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for both groups were 100%. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival rates were 99.7% for very low-risk patients and 100% for low-risk patients (P = 0.69). Therefore, it is suggested that routine follow-up monitoring, including endoscopic surveillance and imaging, may not be necessary for very low-risk and low-risk GISTs after endoscopic resection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships. Commentary Endoscopists who practice endoscopic submucosal and full-thickness resection know that creating traction is one of the most important aspects of the procedure. Traction improves exposure of the tissue plane and has been attempted with multiple different devices. However, these devices can be costly and sometimes challenging to use. The authors demonstrate a technique that allows for traction by using devices readily available in an endoscopy unit (a snare and clips). In this case, the method of traction not only improves exposure to the dissection plane but also prevents the GIST from potentially being lost in the peritoneum. By developing additional traction methods, endoscopists will continue to improve dissection time and procedure safety. Monica Saumoy, MD, MS, Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Mohamed O. Othman, MD, GIE Senior Associate Editor

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous image-guided ablation of soft tissue sarcoma metastases to the liver., Materials and Methods: A single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma who underwent percutaneous image-guided ablation of hepatic metastases between January 2011 and December 2021 was performed. Patients with less than 60 days of follow-up after ablation were excluded. The primary outcome was local tumor progression-free survival (LPFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, liver-specific progression-free survival. and chemotherapy-free survival., Results: Fifty-five patients who underwent percutaneous ablation for 84 metastatic liver lesions were included. The most common histopathological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (23/55), followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumor (22/55). The median treated liver lesions was 2 (range, 1-8), whereas the median size of metastases were 1.8 cm (0.3-8.7 cm). Complete response at 2 months was achieved in 90.5% of the treated lesions. LPFS was 83% at 1 year and 80% at 2 years. Liver-specific progression-free survival was 66% at 1 year and 40% at 2 years. The overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 98% and 94%. The chemotherapy-free holiday from the start of ablation was 71.2% at 12 months. The complication rate was 3.6% (2/55); one of the complications was Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher. LPFS subgroup analysis for leiomyosarcoma versus gastrointestinal stromal tumor suggests histology-agnostic outcomes (2 years, 89% vs 82%, p = .35)., Conclusion: Percutaneous image-guided liver ablation of soft tissue sarcoma metastases is safe and efficacious., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend use of adjuvant imatinib therapy for many patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs); however, its optimal treatment duration is unknown and some patient groups do not benefit from the therapy. We aimed to apply state-of-the-art, interpretable artificial intelligence (ie, predictions or prescription logic that can be easily understood) methods on real-world data to establish which groups of patients with GISTs should receive adjuvant imatinib, its optimal treatment duration, and the benefits conferred by this therapy., Methods: In this observational cohort study, we considered for inclusion all patients who underwent resection of primary, non-metastatic GISTs at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY, USA) between Oct 1, 1982, and Dec 31, 2017, and who were classified as intermediate or high risk according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Miettinen criteria and had complete follow-up data with no missing entries. A counterfactual random forest model, which used predictors of recurrence (mitotic count, tumour size, and tumour site) and imatinib duration to infer the probability of recurrence at 7 years for a given patient under each duration of imatinib treatment, was trained in the MSKCC cohort. Optimal policy trees (OPTs), a state-of-the-art interpretable AI-based method, were used to read the counterfactual random forest model by training a decision tree with the counterfactual predictions. The OPT recommendations were externally validated in two cohorts of patients from Poland (the Polish Clinical GIST Registry), who underwent GIST resection between Dec 1, 1981, and Dec 31, 2011, and from Spain (the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas), who underwent resection between Oct 1, 1987, and Jan 30, 2011., Findings: Among 1007 patients who underwent GIST surgery in MSKCC, 117 were included in the internal cohort; for the external cohorts, the Polish cohort comprised 363 patients and the Spanish cohort comprised 239 patients. The OPT did not recommend imatinib for patients with GISTs of gastric origin measuring less than 15·9 cm with a mitotic count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm 2 or for those with small GISTs (<5·4 cm) of any site with a count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm 2 . In this cohort, the OPT cutoffs had a sensitivity of 92·7% (95% CI 82·4-98·0) and a specificity of 33·9% (22·3-47·0). The application of these cutoffs in the two external cohorts would have spared 38 (29%) of 131 patients in the Spanish cohort and 44 (35%) of 126 patients in the Polish cohort from unnecessary treatment with imatinib. Meanwhile, the risk of undertreating patients in these cohorts was minimal (sensitivity 95·4% [95% CI 89·5-98·5] in the Spanish cohort and 92·4% [88·3-95·4] in the Polish cohort). The OPT tested 33 different durations of imatinib treatment (<5 years) and found that 5 years of treatment conferred the most benefit., Interpretation: If the identified patient subgroups were applied in clinical practice, as many as a third of the current cohort of candidates who do not benefit from adjuvant imatinib would be encouraged to not receive imatinib, subsequently avoiding unnecessary toxicity on patients and financial strain on health-care systems. Our finding that 5 years is the optimal duration of imatinib treatment could be the best source of evidence to inform clinical practice until 2028, when a randomised controlled trial with the same aims is expected to report its findings., Funding: National Cancer Institute., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DB is a cofounding partner of Interpretable AI. JMB reports personal medical consulting fees from PharmaMar, Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer, GSK, Novartis, Roche, Asofarma, Tecnofarma, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim; grants provided to his institution from Adaptimmune, Amgen, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Cebiotex, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, GSK, IMMIX Biopharma, SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inhibrx, Karyiopharm, Lilly, Lixte, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Philogen, PTC Therapeutics, and Ran Therapeutics; personal payment or honoraria for lectures and presentations from PharmaMar and for expert testimony from PharmaMar, Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer, Roche, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Eisai; and personal support for attending meetings from FarmaMar and Novartis. JMB is also a member of the boards or committees for Asofarma, Tecnofarma, and Sarcoma Research Solutions, outside the submitted work. PC reports grants provided to her institution from Pfizer–Array, Deciphera, and Ningbo NewBay; and consulting fees from Deciphera and Ningbo NewBay. PC also serves on the advisory board and steering committee for Ningbo NewBay, and on the steering committee for Deciphera (unpaid), outside the submitted work. PR reports personal consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, Pfizer, Genesis, and Madison Pharma; payment or honoraria for participating in lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, and AstraZeneca; personal support for attending meetings from Orphan Europe and Pierre Fabre; and other financial or non-financial interests provided to his institution from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. AK reports a personal grant from the Onassis Foundation and ownership of Pfizer stocks. PS reports personal payment or honoraria for participation in lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, and Sandoz; and personal support for attending meetings from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Pierre-Fabre. PS also serves as a board or committee member of Sandoz, the Polish Society of Clinical Oncology (unpaid), the European Society of Medical Oncology (unpaid), and the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (unpaid). PS also holds personal stocks at Celon Pharma. PS receives institutional funding for a drug clinical trial from Immutep; and reports other institutional research funding from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. WDT reports personal fees from Eli Lilly, C4 Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Servier, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Cogent, Foghorn Therapeutics, Amgen, AmMax Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, BioAtla, Inhibrx, PharmaEssentia, Avacta, Ipsen, Sonata, Abbisko, and Aadi. WDT also holds a patent titled ‘Companion Diagnostic for CDK4 inhibitors - 14/854,329’ pending to the MSKCC–Sloan Kettering Institute, and another patent titled ‘Enigma and CDH18 as Companion Diagnostics for CDK4 inhibition – SKI2016-021-03’ issued to MSKCC–Sloan Kettering Institute. WDT also serves on the scientific advisory board for Certis Oncology Solutions; holds stock ownership and co-founder positions at Atropos Therapeutics; holds stock ownership and serves on the scientific advisory board for Innova Therapeutics; and is a member of the Strategic Advisory Board for The Osteosarcoma Institute, all outside the submitted work. JW reports grants provided to her institution from the University of California San Francisco Noyce Initiative Computational Innovator Postdoctoral Fellowship Award. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Aim: Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (≤ 5 cm) but remains a controversial approach for larger gastric GISTs (> 5 cm). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in comparison with open resection for gastric GISTs measuring over 5 cm., Method: All patients receiving surgery for gastric GIST > 5 cm between 2000 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital were included. Data were collected from prospectively maintained records. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to compare survival outcomes., Results: Among 108 included patients, 59 patients had minimally invasive (MI) surgery (54.6%) whereas 49 patients had open surgery (46.4%). The rate of overall postoperative morbidity was 14.8% and the median length was significantly shorter in the MI group [4 (range 2-30) vs. 7 (range 4-33) days; P = 0.007]. The overall R0 resection rate was 98.2% and the rate of tumor rupture was 13%, not different between the two groups. Recurrence occurred in 24% of the whole population without any difference between groups (20.3% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.31). Minimally invasive surgery was not found as a negative prognostic disease-free survival factor., Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery could be a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in large gastric GIST, bringing the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising oncologic results., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The ideal surgical approach for treating cardia gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is not clearly established. This study aimed to assess the long-term survival results among patients who received endoscopic therapy (ET) or surgical resection (SR) for cardia GIST. Cardia GIST patients from 2000 to 2019 were selected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end result (SEER) database. Multiple imputation (MI) was applied to handle missing data, and propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to mitigate selection bias during comparisons. Demographic and clinical characteristics' effects on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 330 patients with cardia GIST were enrolled, including 47 (14.2%) patients with ET and 283 (85.8%) patients with SR. The 5-year OS and CSS rates in the ET and SR groups were comparable [before PSM, (OS) (76.1% vs. 81.2%, P = 0.722), (CSS) (95.0% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.186); after PSM, (OS) (75.4% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.540), (CSS) (94.9% vs. 92.0%, P = 0.099)]. Moreover, there was no significant difference between ET and SR in terms of long-term OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.735, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.422-1.282) and CSS (HR 1.560, 95% CI 0.543-4.481). Our study found no significant disparity in long-term survival outcomes between ET and SR in cardia GIST patients, implying that ET could be a valid surgical strategy for treating cardia GIST., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: Early gastric cancer endoscopic resection (ER) is prominent in Japan. However, evidence regarding ER of gastric submucosal tumors (SMT) is limited. This prospective multicenter phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for gastric SMT., Methods: Endoscopic full-thickness resection indication for gastric SMT was 11-30 mm, histologically proven or clinically suspicious (irregular margin, increasing size, or internal heterogeneity) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), with no ulceration and intraluminal growth type. The primary end-point was the complete ER (ER0) rate, with a sample size of 42., Results: We enrolled 46 patients with 46 lesions between September 2020 and May 2023 at seven Japanese institutions. The mean ± SD (range) endoscopic tumor size was 18.8 ± 4.5 (11-28) mm. The tumor resection and defect closure times were 54 ± 26 (22-125) min and 33 ± 28 (12-186) min, respectively. A 100% ER0 was achieved in all 46 patients. The EFTR procedure was accomplished in all patients without surgical intervention. One patient had delayed perforation and was managed endoscopically. GIST accounted for 76% (n = 35) of the cases. R0, R1, and RX rates were 33 (77%), 3 (6.5%), and 7 (15%), respectively., Conclusion: Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric SMT of 11-30 mm is efficacious. It warrants further validation in a large-scale cohort study to determine the long-term outcome of this treatment for patients with gastric GIST., (© 2023 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background/aims: There is limited knowledge regarding the management of duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs) owing to a lack of understanding of their natural course. This study aimed to assess the natural course of asymptomatic duodenal SELs and provide management recommendations., Methods: Patients diagnosed with duodenal SELs and followed up for a minimum of 6 months were retrospectively investigated., Results: Among the 443,533 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between 2008 and 2020, duodenal SELs were identified in 0.39% (1,713 patients). Among them, 396 duodenal SELs were monitored for a median period of 72.5 months (interquartile range, 37.7-111.3 mo). Of them, 16 SELs (4.0%) showed substantial changes in size or morphology at a median follow-up of 35.1 months (interquartile range, 21.7-51.4 mo). Of these SELs with substantial changes, tissues of two SELs were acquired using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: one was a lipoma and the other was non-diagnostic. Three SELs were surgically or endoscopically removed; two were diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and one was a lipoma. An initial size of 20 mm or larger was associated with substantial changes during follow-up (p = 0.016)., Conclusion: While the majority of duodenal SELs may not exhibit substantial interval changes, regular follow-up with endoscopy may be necessary for cases with an initial size of 20 mm or larger, considering a possibility of malignancy.

Background: The role of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in patients requiring surgery for gastric GISTs. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 4, 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the literature to select all types of analytic studies comparing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for GISTs and reporting intraoperative, postoperative, and/or pathological outcomes. Results: Overall, 4 retrospective studies were selected, including a total of 264 patients, specifically 111 (42%) in the robotic and 153 (58%) in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operating time (+42.46 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.34, 75.58; P =0.01; I 2 : 85%) and reduced use of mechanical staplers (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.11; P <0.00001; I 2 : 92%;) compared with laparoscopy. Although nonsignificant, conversion to open surgery was less frequently reported for robotic surgery (2.7%) than laparoscopy (5.2%) (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.17, 2.03; P =0.4; I 2 : 0%). No difference was found for postoperative and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for gastric GISTs provides similar intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes to laparoscopy, despite longer operative time.

Background: Small intestinal stromal tumors (SISTs) are a rare type of mesenchymal tumor. Gender is known to influence the incidence and prognosis of various tumors, but its role on the survival of SISTs at the population level remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to explore the relationship between gender and the prognosis of SISTs using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database., Methods: Data on SISTs patients from 2000 to 2019 were derived from the SEER database. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were applied to evaluate the impact of demographic and clinical characteristics on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS)., Results: A total of 3513 patients with SISTs were analyzed, including 1921 males and 1592 females. Kaplan-Meier analysis coupled with log-rank testing demonstrated a significantly higher mortality rate among male patients compared to females (P < 0.001). Notably, female patients exhibited superior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.808, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.724-0.902, P < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.801, 95% CI 0.692-0.927, P = 0.003) compared to male patients. While the mean 1-year CSS rates were comparable between genders (95.3% for males vs. 96.0% for females, P = 0.332), male patients consistently showed lower mean survival rates at 3-, 5-, and 10-year intervals. Surgical intervention significantly boosted 5-year OS and CSS rates in both male and female patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, sex, grade, TNM stage, surgery, and mitotic rate as independent risk factors for OS and CSS in patients with SISTs., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that male patients with SISTs have a higher risk of mortality compared to female patients, indicating that gender may serve as a predictive indicator for survival in this patient population., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Small intestinal stromal tumors (SISTs) typically require surgical treatment. However, the impact of lymphadenectomy (LA) on long-term prognosis in patients remains unclear. Therefore, we plan to analyze the effect of LA on the prognosis of patients with SISTs using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database., Methods: Data on SISTs patients between 2000 and 2019 were obtained from the SEER database. Multiple imputation (MI) was employed to handle missing data, while propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to mitigate selection bias in the comparative assessments between the LA group and the No-LA group. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS)., Results: A total of 2412 patients diagnosed with SISTs were included in the study, with 879 undergoing LA and 1533 not undergoing LA. There were no significant differences observed between the two cohorts concerning long-term OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.13, P  = 0.720) and CSS (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86-1.29, P = 0.622). After PSM, 1596 patients (798 in the LA group and 789 in the No-LA group) were matched for comparison. There was also no difference in long-term OS and CSS between the two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that in the age group > 60 years, the CSS in the No-LA group was superior to that in the LA group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, M stage, marital status, and mitotic rate are significant risk factors influencing OS and CSS., Conclusions: Conducting LA in patients with SISTs does not enhance long-term prognosis. For patients aged over 60 years, it may be more advisable to refrain from performing LA., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Patients with high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) receiving adjuvant imatinib have improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), however whether a complete cytocidal effect exists is unknown. We investigated this using a normalized recurrence timeline measured from end of oncologic treatment (EOOT), defined as the later of resection or end of adjuvant therapy., Methods: We reviewed patients with resected high-risk GIST at our cancer center from 2003 to 2018. RFS (measured from resection and EOOT), overall survival (OS), and time to imatinib resistance (TTIR) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was assessed., Results: We identified 86 patients with high-risk GIST with a median 106 months of postsurgical follow-up. One-third (n = 29; 34%) did not receive adjuvant imatinib, while 57 (66%) did for a median of 3 years. The MSK nomogram-predicted 5-year RFS for patients receiving adjuvant imatinib was similar to those who did not (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.64). When RFS was measured from EOOT, the MSK-predicted RFS was independently associated with EOOT RFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p = 0.02), while adjuvant imatinib receipt and duration were not. Neither receipt nor duration of adjuvant imatinib were associated with TTIR or OS (all p > 0.05)., Conclusions: Treatment with adjuvant imatinib delays, but does not clearly impact ultimate recurrence, TTIR, or OS, suggesting many patients with high-risk GIST may receive adjuvant imatinib unnecessarily. Additional studies are needed to establish the benefit of adjuvant therapy versus initiating therapy at first radiographic recurrence., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

A 7-year-old castrated male Golden Retriever weighing 36.8 kg presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital with vomiting, anorexia and depression. After blood tests, radiographic, ultrasound and computed tomography examinations, a 7.85 × 5.90 × 8.75 cm mass was identified in the caecum. To visualise the tumour margin and improve the accuracy of tumour resection, intraoperative short-wave infrared imaging using indocyanine green was performed during surgery. An indocyanine green solution was injected intravenously as a bolus of 5 mg/kg 24 h before surgery. Tumour resection was performed with a 0.5 cm margin from the fluorescent-marked tissues. Histopathological examination revealed a diagnosis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) and the absence of neoplastic cells in the surgical margin, indicating a successful surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a GIST resection in a dog using intraoperative short-wave infrared imaging., (© 2024 The Author(s). Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Due to rarity of duodenal GISTs, clinicians have few information about its clinical features, diagnosis, management and prognosis., Case Report: We report a case of promptly diagnosed duodenal GIST in a 61-year-old Egyptian man presented shocked with severe attack of hematemesis and melena. Upper gastroduodenal endoscopy was done and revealed a large ulcerating bleeding mass at first part of duodenum 4 hemo-clips were applied with good hemostasis. An exploratory laparotomy and distal gastrectomy, duodenectomy and gastrojejunostomy were performed. The morphology of the mass combined with immunohistochemistry was consistent with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of high risk type. The patient is on amatinib one tablet daily and he was well with no evidence of tumor recurrence., Conclusion: despite being rare, emergency presentation with sudden severe, life-threatening hemorrhagic shock duodenal GISTs might be a cause of potentially lethal massive combined upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding which is the key feature of this rare and challenging tumor., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) account for 1 to 2% of gastrointestinal malignant tumors. They are characterized by overexpression of the tyrosine kinase (KIT). 60% of GISTs originate in the stomach. Managing them remains complex and varies depending on several factors such as location, size, molecular biology, type of clinical presentation, and the risks/benefits of surgical treatment. Surgery remains the only curative treatment, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors have demonstrated their efficacy as systemic treatment in the perioperative context. Risk stratification for recurrence guides the choice of adjuvant treatment, with a recommended duration of 3 years for high-risk patients., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

BACKGROUND Persistent truncus arteriosus is a rare congenital cyanotic heart defect characterized by a single ventricular outflow tract. Without surgical intervention, it has a poor prognosis in infancy. Here, we report an adult female patient with uncorrected truncus arteriosus type I, who presented with acute-onset abdominal pain due to torsion of a small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). CASE REPORT A 41-year-old woman came to our Emergency Department with acute-onset lower abdominal pain for 2 days. Congenital heart disease, truncus arteriosus, had been diagnosed at birth, and there had been no surgical intervention. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 10×9×12-cm mixed-density mass in the pelvic capacity. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a 33-mm ventricular septal defect. The ascending aorta originated mainly from the right ventricle, and the pulmonary artery originated from the beginning of the aorta (type I truncus arteriosus, according to Collett and Edwards classification). After a quick and detailed preoperative workup, the patient underwent tumor resection by open surgery with general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS This is the first case to report emergency surgery for a patient with uncorrected persistent truncus arteriosus due to torsion of a small bowel GIST. A multidisciplinary team with deep understanding of the disease entity was crucial. By considering the fixed hemodynamic and respiratory physiology, overtreatment and unrealistic goals were avoided. Eventually, the patient was discharged after being hospitalized for 2 weeks.

Background: The role of endoscopic resection (ER) in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been fully elucidated., Aims: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ER in patients with GISTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP)., Methods: A total of 233 consecutive patients with gastric GISTs originating from the MP layer, who underwent ER between February 2012 and May 2023, were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were recorded and compared between patients who underwent en bloc resection and piecemeal resection., Results: Among the 233 patients, the median size of GISTs was 12 mm (range 5-60 mm). Risk assessment categorized 190 patients as very low risk, 26 as low risk, 10 as moderate risk, and 7 as high risk. The procedures performed included endoscopic submucosal excavation (127 cases), endoscopic full-thickness resection (103 cases), and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (3 cases). The complete and R0 resection rate was 93.1%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of cases (perioperative perforations 1.7%, perioperative bleeding 1.3%, both 0.9%), resulting in conversion to surgery in 1.3% of cases. Risk factors associated with piecemeal resection were tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 0.402, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.207-0.783; P = 0.007] and shape (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.009-0.235; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: ER is proven to be an effective and reasonably safe approach for gastric GISTs originating from the MP. Notably, larger tumor size and irregular shape are identified as risk factors for piecemeal resection during ER procedures., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

As bariatric surgeries (BS) increase, more incidental findings are liable to be discovered. Incidental gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) during BS can be found in around 0.7% of the cases. In this article, we have performed a systematic review of the literature and added our data to those of the review to review a conceptual treatment strategy to both improve patient outcomes and decrease the risk of overall cancer. With the rise of new bariatric techniques, we have proposed a new classification to BS to enhance our description of the treatment strategy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Endoscopic therapy (ET) of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has become a viable treatment. We intended to compare long-term outcomes of ET versus surgical resection for 2-5 cm GIST using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database., Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to compare the long-term outcomes of patients treated with ET and surgical resection for GIST. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors for patients survival. To balance the clinicopathologic characteristics, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized., Results: A total of 749 patients with 2-5 cm GIST were enrolled, of whom 113 accepted ET and 636 underwent surgical resection. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between ET and surgical resection (5-year overall survival (OS): 93.5% vs. 91.6%, P=0.374; 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS): 99.1% vs. 96.5%, P=0.546; 10-year OS: 71.1% vs. 78.2%, P=0.374; 10-year CSS: 93.6% vs. 92.7%, P=0.546). After adjusting for the relevant variables using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we observed that the ET and surgical resection groups were similar in OS (HR 0.726, 95%CI 0.457-1.153, P=0.175) and CSS (HR 1.286, 95%CI 0.474-3.488, P=0.621). After PSM, the long-term OS and CSS of patients with 2-5 cm GIST after ET and surgical resection were comparable., Conclusions: We found that the long-term survival of patients with 2-5 cm gastric GIST after ET and surgical resection were comparable. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the role of ET in 2-5 cm GIST., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared into influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Many studies of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (g-GISTs) following endoscopic resection (ER) have typically focused on tumor size, with most tumors at low risk of aggressiveness after risk stratification. There have been few systematic studies on the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- or high-risk g-GISTs after ER., Methods: From January 2014 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected patients considered at intermediate- or high-risk of g-GISTs according to the modified NIH consensus classification system. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS)., Results: Six hundred and seventy nine (679) consecutive patients were diagnosed with g-GISTs and treated by ER between January 2014 and January 2020 in three hospitals in Shanghai, China. 43 patients (20 males and 23 females) were confirmed at intermediate-or high-risk. The mean size of tumors was 2.23 ± 1.01 cm. The median follow-up period was 62.02 ± 15.34 months, with a range of 28 to 105 months. There were no recurrences or metastases, even among patients having R1 resections. The 5-year OS rate was 97.4% (42/43)., Conclusion: ER for intermediate- or high-risk gastric small GISTs is a feasible and safe method, which allows for a wait-and-see approach before determining the necessity for imatinib adjuvant or surgical treatment. This approach to g-GISTs does require that patients undergo close follow-up., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Although several prognostic factors in GIST have been well studied such as tumour size, mitotic rate, or localization, the influence of microscopic margins or R1 resection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GIST in a large multicentre retrospective series of patients., Methods: From 2001 to 2013, 1413 patients who underwent surgery for any site of GIST were identified from 61 European centers. 1098 patients were included, excluding synchronous metastases, concurrent malignancies, R2 resection or GIST recurrence. Tumour rupture (TR) was reclassified according to the Oslo sarcoma classification. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to analyse 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS)., Results: Of 1098 patients, 38 (3%) underwent R1 resection with a risk of TR of 11%. The 5-year RFS was 89.6% with a median follow-up of 81 months [range: 31.2-152 months]. On univariate analysis, lower RFS was significantly associated with R1 resection [HR = 2.13; p = 0.04], high risk score according to the modified NIH classification, administration of adjuvant therapy [HR = 2.24; p < 0.001] and intraoperative complications [HR = 2.82; p < 0.001]. Only intraoperative complications [HR = 1.79; p = 0.02] and high risk according to the modified NIH classification including the updated definition of TR [HR = 3.43; p = 0.04] remained significant on multivariate analysis., Conclusion: This study shows that positive microscopic margins are not an independent predictive factor for RFS in GIST when taking into account the up-dated classification of TR. R1 resection may be considered a reasonable alternative to avoid major functional sequelae and should not lead to reoperation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Surgical resection is a gold standard treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). It can be performed by minimally invasive surgery approach in most of the patients. It has been shown that advanced age is not a clear poor prognostic factor in patients who underwent surgery for GIST. We hypothesized that elderly patients undergo elective surgery less often compared to younger population. We aim to evaluate the safety, efficacy and oncological results of GIST treatment in the elderly population in our Medical Center. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent surgery for GIST in Shamir Medical Center from January 1, 2016, to July 31, 2023, were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included patients younger than 75 years, while patients older than 75 years were included in Group 2. The groups were compared according to demographics, clinical and surgical parameters, complications, and pathology results. Results: Overall, 49 patients were included in the study. Group 1 included 28 patients and Group 2 included 21 patients. Group 2 patients more often underwent emergency surgery (52.4% versus 14.3%, P  < .05) and had increased open surgery rate (19% versus 0%, P  < .05). No difference between the groups was noted in surgical parameters, complications, and length of hospital stay. Tumor size, number of mitoses, level of ki67%, and involvement of surgical margins were not significantly different. However, in Group 2 patients, tumor size was larger and there was a trend toward higher rate of ki67 > 5%. Conclusion: Elderly patients with GIST are less frequently undergoing electively surgery and relatively often undergo open surgery. Frequency of complications is similar in elderly patients compares to younger patients group.

Background: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. SEER is an extensive cancer database which proves useful in analyzing population trends. This analysis investigated GIST outcomes between geriatric & non-geriatric patients., Methods: SEER*STAT 8.4.0.1 was used to extract relevant GIST data from 2000 to 2019. Geriatric age was defined as ≥70 years. Variables included age, sex, surgery, cancer-specific death, and overall survival. Statistical tests included univariate analysis using KM survival estimate (95% confidence interval) to calculate 5-year survival (5YS). Log-Rank tests determined statistical significance. Multivariable Cox's PH regression estimated the geriatric hazard death ratio adjusted for sex, stage, and surgery., Results: The number of patients included was 13,579, yielding overall 5YS of 68.6% (95% CI 67.7-69.5). Cancer-specific death was 39.11% in 2000 & 3.33% in 2019. Non-geriatric & geriatric patient data yielded 5YS of 77.4% (76.4%-78.3%) and 53.3% (51.7%-54.8%) respectively (p < 0.0001). For no surgery/surgery, younger patient data yielded 5YS of 48.7% (45.8%-51.4%) and 83.7% (82.7%-84.7%) respectively (p < 0.0001); geriatric data yielded 5YS of 29.3% (26.5%-32.1%) and 62.8% (60.8%-64.6%) respectively (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis yielded a geriatric hazard death of 2.56 (2.42-2.70) (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Cancer-specific death decreased since 2000, indicating an improvement in survival & treatment methods. Observed lower survival rates overall in the geriatric group. Surgery appeared to enhance survival rates in both groups, suggesting that surgery is an important factor in GIST survival regardless of age. Large prospective studies will help define clinical management for geriatric patients., (© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).)