Search

Sharon Lee,1,2 Janelle Gifford,2,3 Victoria Flood1,2,4 1Western Sydney Local Health District, Research and Education Network, Westmead, 2145, Australia; 2Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia; 3Sport and Physical Activity Research and Teaching Network (SPARTAN), The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia; 4University Centre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, 2480, AustraliaCorrespondence: Professor Victoria Flood, Westmead Hospital, Research & Education Network, Corner Hawkesbury & Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia, Tel + 61288905772, Fax +61288908627, Email Vicki.flood@sydney.edu.auBackground: In response to the increasing involvement of nursing, allied health and medical professionals in research within clinical service roles, understanding the varying research capacities across public health institutions and professions is crucial. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of conducting research among nursing, allied health and medical health professionals within a tertiary public hospital setting in New South Wales (NSW). The focus is on identifying barriers and enablers to research engagement.Methods: Research active health professionals across nursing, allied health and medical professions were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview to discuss enablers and barriers experienced whilst conducting research. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, conceptual and thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted.Results: Nine allied health professionals, eight nurses/midwives and thirteen medical officers were interviewed. Key themes were categorised as barriers or enablers. The ethics regulatory process was identified as a strong barrier in all professions, other commonly identified barriers were lack of time to conduct research and lack of funding. Researchers reported difficulties knowing where to obtain assistance and support when required. Mentorship was the most common enabler identified by all three professions. In addition, a positive research culture and organisational support and assistance within the organisation were seen as strong enablers.Conclusion: This research provides insight into the barriers and enablers for active clinician researchers across three professional groups. We have identified priority areas to increase research capacity within our health care organisation and will focus on training in the ethics regulatory process and mentorship along with infrastructure support to strengthen the positive research culture across all professions.Plain Language Summary: Research by healthcare professionals employed in publicly funded health services is encouraged across nursing/midwifery, allied health and medical professionals. This study sought to identify barriers and enablers to undertaking research for these healthcare professionals. Interviews were conducted with representatives from each of the professions. Barriers identified across all professional groups were inconsistencies and difficulties with the ethical regulatory process. Enablers such as a positive research culture within the institutions were found meaningful by the professional groups. This study will allow health organisations to tailor training and infrastructure support to all researchers.Keywords: research capacity, allied health, nursing, medical, research culture

Background: Good nutrition knowledge among carers of people with intellectual disability (ID) living in group homes is essential as they have a primary role in food provision for residents. Research on the nutrition knowledge of carers is limited. Method: This cross-sectional study assessed the level of general nutrition knowledge in a convenience sample of Australian carers (C) of people with ID and compared this to the general Australian community (CM). Nutrition knowledge was evaluated using the validated General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire. Total knowledge score as well as performance on instrument sub-sections (dietary guidelines, nutrient sources, healthy food choices and diet disease relationships) were assessed (expressed as %). Knowledge scores were adjusted for known confounders (age, sex, education level, BMI, living arrangement and English spoken at home) using generalised linear modelling. Results: A total of 589 participants were recruited (C: n = 40; CM: n = 549). Age (C: 40.8 ± 12.1 year; CM: 37.8 ± 13.3 years; P = 0.145), sex distribution (C: 62.5%; CM: 67.2% female; P = 0.602) and English spoken at home (C: 82.5%; CM: 89.6%; P = 0.183) were similar between groups, but BMI (C: 28.5 ± 5.7 kgm-2; CM: 25.3 kgm-2; P = 0.002) was significantly lower and tertiary education (C: 52.5%; CM: 85.1%; P < 0.0005) significantly higher for CM. Total knowledge score (C: 56.6 ± 12.6%; CM: 67.2 ± 12.6%; P < 0.0005) and performance on all instrument sub-sections (P = 0.004) were significantly lower for carers. This remained after confounder adjustment except for the knowledge of dietary guidelines sub-section (P = 0.116). Conclusion: Limited carer nutrition knowledge may compromise their ability to plan and adapt meals to support a healthy and appropriate diet for people with ID in group homes.

Background/Aims To examine the nutritional profile of baby and toddler foods sold in Australia. Methods Nutrient information for baby and toddler foods available at Australian supermarkets was collected between Auguset and December 2013. Levels of declared energy, total fat, saturated fat, total sugar, sodium and estimated added sugar were examined, as well as the presence of additional micronutrients on the label. The Health Star Rating (HSR) system was used to determine nutritional quality. The range of products on offer was also examined by product type and by the age category for which the product was marketed. Results Of the 309 products included, 29 % were fortified. On a per 100 g basis, these 309 products provided a mean (±SD) of 476 ± 486 kJ, 1.6 ± 2.4 g total fat, 10.7 ± 12.2 g total sugar, 2.7 ± 7.4 g added sugar, and 33.5 ± 66.5 mg sodium. Fruit-based products or products with fruit listed as an ingredient (58 %) were the predominant product type. On the nutrition label, 42 % displayed at least one additional micronutrient while 37 % did not display saturated fat. The most common HSR was four stars (45 %) and 6+ months was the most commonly identified targeted age group (36 %). Conclusions The majority of baby and toddler foods sold in Australian supermarkets are ready-made fruit-based products aimed at children under 12 months of age. Baby and toddler foods are overlooked in public policy discussions pertaining to population nutrient intake but their relatively high sugar content deriving from fruits requires close attention to ensure these foods do not replace other more nutrient dense foods, given children have an innate preference for sweet tastes., Author(s): E. Dunford [sup.1] , J. C. Y. Louie [sup.2] , R. Byrne [sup.3] , K. Z. Walker [sup.4] , V. M. Flood [sup.5] [sup.6] Author Affiliations: (1) The George [...]

Depression is the largest global contributor to non-fatal disease burden(1). A growing body of evidence suggests that dietary behaviours, such as higher fruit and vegetable intake, may be protective against the risk of depression(2). However, this evidence is primarily from high-income countries, despite over 80% of the burden of depression being experienced in low- and middle-income countries(1). There are also limited studies to date focusing on older adults. The aim of this study was to prospectively examine the associations between baseline fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of depression in adults aged 45-years and older from 10 cohorts across six continents, including four cohorts from low and middle-income countries. The association between baseline fruit and vegetable intake and incident depression over a 3–6-year follow-up period was examined using Cox proportional hazard regression after controlling for a range of potential confounders. Participants were 7771 community-based adults aged 45+ years from 10 diverse cohorts. All cohorts were members of the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium collaboration(3). Fruit intake (excluding juice) and vegetable intake was collected using either a comprehensive food frequency questionnaire, short food questionnaire or diet history. Depressive symptoms were assessed using validated depression measures, and depression was defined as a score greater than or equal to a validated cut-off. Prior to analysis all data were harmonised. Analysis was performed by cohort and then cohort results were combined using meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed by sex, age (45 – 64 versus 65+ years) and income level of country (high income countries versus low- and middle-income countries). There were 1537 incident cases of depression over 32,420 person-years of follow-up. Mean daily intakes of fruit were 1.7 ± 1.5 serves and vegetables 1.9 ± 1.4. serves. We found no association between fruit and vegetable intakes and risk of incident depression in any of the analyses, and this was consistent across the subgroup analyses. The low intake of fruit and vegetables of participants, diverse measures used across the different cohorts, and modest sample size of our study compared with prior studies in the literature, may have prevented an association being detected. Further investigation using standardised measures in larger cohorts of older adults from low- to middle-income countries is needed. Future research should consider the potential relationship between different types of fruits and vegetables and depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]