1. Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Robotic Right Colectomy
- Author
-
Helin Yikilmaz, Niclas Dohrn, Magnus Laursen, Steffen Brisling, Mads Klein, Henrik Jakobsen, Jakob Lykke, Ismail Gögenur, Faisal Khesrawi, Frederik Bjerg Clausen, Jens Ravn Eriksen, and Frederik Sørensen
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Anastomosis, Surgical ,Robotics ,Anastomosis ,Extracorporeal ,law.invention ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Robotic Surgical Procedures ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Colonic Neoplasms ,Right Colectomy ,Humans ,Medicine ,Laparoscopy ,business ,Colectomy ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
To determine if minimally invasive right colectomy with intra-corporeal anastomosis improves postoperative recovery compared to extra-corporeal anastomosis.Previous trials have shown that intracorporeal anastomosis improves postoperative recovery; however, it has not yet been evaluated in a setting with optimized perioperative care or with patient-related outcome measures.This was a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial at two high-volume colorectal centers with strict adherence to optimized perioperative care pathways. The patients underwent robotic right colectomy with either intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis. The primary outcome was patient-reported postoperative recovery measured using the "Quality of Recovery-15" questionnaire. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130166.A total of 89 patients were randomized and analyzed according to the "Intention-to-treat"-principle. We found no statistically significant differences in patient-reported recovery between the groups. Postoperative pain, nausea, time to ambulation, time to first passage of flatus/stool, length of hospital stay, and pathophysiological tests showed no differences either. The duration of time to create the anastomosis was significantly longer with intracorporeal anastomosis (17 vs 13 min, P = 0.003), while all other intraoperative, postoperative, and pathology variables showed no difference.There were no significant differences in postoperative recovery between the two groups.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF