Back to Search Start Over

Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Robotic Right Colectomy

Authors :
Helin Yikilmaz
Niclas Dohrn
Magnus Laursen
Steffen Brisling
Mads Klein
Henrik Jakobsen
Jakob Lykke
Ismail Gögenur
Faisal Khesrawi
Frederik Bjerg Clausen
Jens Ravn Eriksen
Frederik Sørensen
Source :
Annals of Surgery. 276:e294-e301
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021.

Abstract

To determine if minimally invasive right colectomy with intra-corporeal anastomosis improves postoperative recovery compared to extra-corporeal anastomosis.Previous trials have shown that intracorporeal anastomosis improves postoperative recovery; however, it has not yet been evaluated in a setting with optimized perioperative care or with patient-related outcome measures.This was a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial at two high-volume colorectal centers with strict adherence to optimized perioperative care pathways. The patients underwent robotic right colectomy with either intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis. The primary outcome was patient-reported postoperative recovery measured using the "Quality of Recovery-15" questionnaire. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130166.A total of 89 patients were randomized and analyzed according to the "Intention-to-treat"-principle. We found no statistically significant differences in patient-reported recovery between the groups. Postoperative pain, nausea, time to ambulation, time to first passage of flatus/stool, length of hospital stay, and pathophysiological tests showed no differences either. The duration of time to create the anastomosis was significantly longer with intracorporeal anastomosis (17 vs 13 min, P = 0.003), while all other intraoperative, postoperative, and pathology variables showed no difference.There were no significant differences in postoperative recovery between the two groups.

Details

ISSN :
00034932
Volume :
276
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d12f7e9b9632f211c8b5d4202f58d24c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000005254