Search

Background Corneal blindness is a significant global health issue, particularly in developing countries. The availability of donated corneas for transplantation is crucial in addressing this challenge. Objectives This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding eye donation, eye banking, and corneal transplant among the non-teaching staff at a tertiary care hospital to identify potential areas for intervention that could improve donation rates. Methods A prospective, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted over 12 months at the Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences. The sample consisted of 400 non-teaching faculty members aged 18 to 60 years. Participants completed a 15-item questionnaire designed to evaluate their knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning eye donation. Descriptive statistics were utilized for data analysis. Results The study encompassed 360 non-teaching faculty members, constituting 90% of the intended sample size. Participants, spanning ages 18 to 60, exhibited a balanced gender distribution, with 54.5% male and 45.5% female representation. Findings revealed a high level of awareness (90%) regarding eye donation, primarily disseminated through educational institutions (82%). Notably, 53% expressed willingness to donate their eyes, while reluctance stemmed from factors such as lack of awareness (43%) and religious beliefs (38%). Additionally, while 50% were receptive to participating in eye donation campaigns, only 28% actively promoted eye donation Conclusions The results suggest that while awareness about eye donation is high among non-teaching staff at the tertiary care hospital, this does not necessarily translate into positive attitudes or practices towards eye donation. By improving knowledge and attitudes among this key group, there may be a broader impact on the community's willingness to engage in eye donation, thus potentially increasing the donor cornea supply. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report the clinical profile and donor characteristics of post-optical keratoplasty adverse events notified at an eye bank. Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2022, 37,041 donor corneas were utilized for keratoplasty, of which 16,531 were used for penetrating keratoplasty (PK), 12,171 for endothelial keratoplasty (EK), and 1356 for anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK). EK included 10,956 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and 1215 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). The adverse events reported within the first 6 weeks of optical keratoplasty were analyzed for donor-related parameters. Results: A total of 41 (0.11%) recipients had post-keratoplasty infections. Of these, 33 occurred after EK (29 after DSAEK, and four after DMEK), two after ALK, and six after PK. The clinical presentation was keratitis alone in 16 eyes and associated with endophthalmitis in 25 eyes. The organisms isolated were gram-negative bacteria in 26 eyes, fungus in eight eyes, gram-positive bacteria in four eyes, mixed infection in five eyes, and microbiology inconclusive in seven eyes. The majority (78%) of the gram-negative infections were due to multidrug-resistant organisms. Most (88%) donor corneas were harvested from hospital premises. The most common cause of donor mortality was trauma. The median duration of presentation from surgery was 4.46 (range: 1–30) days. The death to preservation time was 4.18 (1.5–7.65) hours. The death to utilization time was 3 (2–4.7) days. Conclusion: The overall risk of infectious adverse events after keratoplasty was 0.11%, ranging from 0.08% to 0.36%. Most (80.4%) of the adverse events occurred after EK. The majority (78.9%) of the adverse events were of bacterial etiology, of which gram-negative infections (68.4%) were the most common. The trends and microbiological spectrum of organisms associated with infections should be thoroughly documented in eye banks to gain insights and formulate guidelines on the management of adverse events.

Abstract To evaluate the clinical implications of the different trypan blue dyeing techniques used during liquid bubble (LBT) and manual peel (MPT) DMEK lenticule preparation techniques. This study retrospectively compared the degree to which endothelial cells are preserved using selective Descemet Membrane (DM) staining (LBT) versus bath-staining (MPT) when performed by a single surgeon, sourced from a single eye bank. Endothelial cell density measured after the 3-month follow-up was 1805 and 1916 cells/mm2 respectively, differing significantly (p = 0.012). A double-scroll graft formation was found and maintained until implantation in 94% of preparations with bath staining and 50% of preparations using selective DM staining. Preoperative visual acuity was comparable between preparation techniques at 0.4 logMAR as well as postoperatively, at an average of 0.1 logMAR. Reducing chemical stress on the endothelium by avoiding any contact with trypan blue allows for a significantly higher degree of cell preservation. However, achieving the often-desired double-scroll graft formation was possible less frequently. It remains unclear which factors define the differences graft scrolling behavior observed between LBT and MPT.

Abstract Introduction Although antifungal supplementation reduces the fungal load in the corneal storage medium, consensus is lacking on the influence of dosing and temperature. The study aims to evaluate the impact of eye bank warming protocol and timing of antifungal supplements on efficacy in Optisol-GS and tissue. Methods Corneoscleral rims contaminated with Candida albicans (C. albicans) were incubated in Optisol-GS, either without antifungal agents or with the addition of amphotericin B or voriconazole at various concentrations (2 ×, 5 ×, 10 ×, and 20 × MIC), at different time points, and under various preservation temperatures (2–8 °C versus 2 h-room temperature exposure). Antifungal efficacy was evaluated by counting viable yeast colonies cultured from Optisol-GS samples. Tissue sterility was determined through direct tissue culture and histological examination of the contaminated rims after a 14-day incubation period. Results Room temperature exposure did not increase colony growth at the same multiple MIC of antifungal agents. Although antifungal addition reduced C. albicans growth in a concentration-dependent manner, yeast growth was still observed in all Optisol-GS samples with a single supplementation after a 14-day incubation. Only groups with additional antifungal supplementation on either day 2 or day 6 showed a 99% or greater reduction of C. albicans growth in Optisol-GS samples and yielded negative results in direct tissue culture. Conclusions The eye bank warming protocol did not compromise antifungal efficacy. To sustain the required concentration and effectively reduce C. albicans growth in Optisol-GS and contaminated tissue, additional antifungal supplementation on either day 2 or day 6 was necessary during a 2-week preservation period.

Purpose: ReLEx (Refractive Lenticule Extraction) Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE), the second generation of ReLEx Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction (FLEx), is a minimally invasive, flapless procedure designed to treat refractive errors such as myopia, hyperopia, presbyopia, and astigmatism. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods for preserving SMILE-derived lenticules and discusses their potential future applications. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, focusing on articles published up to January 2024 and available in English. The authors also evaluated the reference lists of the collected papers to identify any additional relevant research. Results: No standardized protocols currently exist for the storage or clinical application of SMILE-derived lenticules. However, these lenticules present a promising resource for therapeutic uses, particularly in addressing the shortage of donor corneal tissues. Their potential applications include inlay and overlay additive keratoplasty, as well as other ocular surface applications. Further research is needed to establish reliable protocols for their preservation and clinical use. Conclusion: SMILE-derived lenticules offer significant potential as an alternative to donor corneal tissues. Standardizing their storage and application methods could enhance their use in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Although antifungal supplementation reduces the fungal load in the corneal storage medium, consensus is lacking on the influence of dosing and temperature. The study aims to evaluate the impact of eye bank warming protocol and timing of antifungal supplements on efficacy in Optisol-GS and tissue. Methods: Corneoscleral rims contaminated with Candida albicans (C. albicans) were incubated in Optisol-GS, either without antifungal agents or with the addition of amphotericin B or voriconazole at various concentrations (2 ×, 5 ×, 10 ×, and 20 × MIC), at different time points, and under various preservation temperatures (2–8 °C versus 2 h-room temperature exposure). Antifungal efficacy was evaluated by counting viable yeast colonies cultured from Optisol-GS samples. Tissue sterility was determined through direct tissue culture and histological examination of the contaminated rims after a 14-day incubation period. Results: Room temperature exposure did not increase colony growth at the same multiple MIC of antifungal agents. Although antifungal addition reduced C. albicans growth in a concentration-dependent manner, yeast growth was still observed in all Optisol-GS samples with a single supplementation after a 14-day incubation. Only groups with additional antifungal supplementation on either day 2 or day 6 showed a 99% or greater reduction of C. albicans growth in Optisol-GS samples and yielded negative results in direct tissue culture. Conclusions: The eye bank warming protocol did not compromise antifungal efficacy. To sustain the required concentration and effectively reduce C. albicans growth in Optisol-GS and contaminated tissue, additional antifungal supplementation on either day 2 or day 6 was necessary during a 2-week preservation period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the clinical implications of the different trypan blue dyeing techniques used during liquid bubble (LBT) and manual peel (MPT) DMEK lenticule preparation techniques. This study retrospectively compared the degree to which endothelial cells are preserved using selective Descemet Membrane (DM) staining (LBT) versus bath-staining (MPT) when performed by a single surgeon, sourced from a single eye bank. Endothelial cell density measured after the 3-month follow-up was 1805 and 1916 cells/mm2 respectively, differing significantly (p = 0.012). A double-scroll graft formation was found and maintained until implantation in 94% of preparations with bath staining and 50% of preparations using selective DM staining. Preoperative visual acuity was comparable between preparation techniques at 0.4 logMAR as well as postoperatively, at an average of 0.1 logMAR. Reducing chemical stress on the endothelium by avoiding any contact with trypan blue allows for a significantly higher degree of cell preservation. However, achieving the often-desired double-scroll graft formation was possible less frequently. It remains unclear which factors define the differences graft scrolling behavior observed between LBT and MPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review highlights the evolution in the scope of eye banking activities in India. The roles and responsibilities of the eye banks have expanded to match the requirements and necessities that arose because of advancements in keratoplasty techniques and the need for corneal surgeons. Adoption of different types of corneal preservation solutions and methods of donor cornea preservation was a consequence of the changing and unprecedented times. The growth of eye banking in India has been a commendable journey and has placed the country in an "almost sufficient" category in eye banking and corneal transplantation. There exists a potential to reach the status of cornea surplus country in the future. The rules and laws governing eye banking operations need dynamic amendments based on the trends in keratoplasty, surgical practice patterns, and status of self-sufficiency. Newer technological advances and quality measures must be adopted in donor cornea evaluation and tissue preparation. Research should be integrated as an important component of eye banking, especially in developing novel methods of donor preservation, and evaluating and validating the existing and changing practices of eye banking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The cornea is the most frequently transplanted human tissue, and corneal transplantation represents the most successful allogeneic transplant worldwide. In order to obtain good surgical outcome and visual rehabilitation and to ensure the safety of the recipient, accurate screening of donors and donor tissues is necessary throughout the process. This mitigates the risks of transmission to the recipient, including infectious diseases and environmental contaminants, and ensures high optical and functional quality of the tissues. The process can be divided into 3 stages: (1) donor evaluation and selection before tissue harvest performed by the retrieval team, (2) tissue analysis during the storage phase conducted by the eye bank technicians after the retrieval, and, (3) tissue quality checks undertaken by the surgeons in the operating room before transplantation. Although process improvements over the years have greatly enhanced safety, quality, and outcome of the corneal transplants, a lack of standardization between centers during certain phases of the process still remains, and may impact on the quality and number of transplanted corneas. Here we detail the donor screening process for the retrieval teams, eye bank operators. and ophthalmic surgeons and examine the limitations associated with each of these stages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corneal blindness is an important contributor to the burden of global blindness and has a greater prevalence in low-income countries of the developing world where resources and infrastructure are limited. The causes of corneal blindness too are different from high-income countries and include infectious keratitis, ocular trauma, and xerophthalmia. Persons with these indications tend to have unfavourable outcomes after corneal transplantation, limiting their chances of benefitting from this sight-saving procedure. However, most causes of corneal blindness in the developing world are preventable. This highlights the importance of understanding the unique challenges in these regions and the need for targeted interventions. This article discusses various prevention strategies, including primordial, primary, and secondary prevention, aimed at reducing the burden of corneal blindness in low-income countries. These include capacity building, training, and awareness campaigns to reduce the risk factors of ocular trauma, infectious keratitis, and to improve access to first aid. It is also important to promote safe eye practices and tackle nutritional deficiencies through public health interventions and policy changes. Providing the required training to general ophthalmologists in the management of basic corneal surgeries and diseases and enhancing the accessibility of eye care services in rural areas will ensure early treatment and prevent sequelae. Current treatment modalities belong to the tertiary level of prevention and are largely limited to corneal transplantation. In developing nations, there is a scarcity of donor corneal tissue necessitating an urgent expansion of eye banking services. Alternative approaches to corneal transplantation such as 3D printed corneas, cultured stem cells, and biomaterials should also be explored to meet this demand. Thus, there is a need for collaborative efforts between healthcare professionals, policymakers, and communities to implement effective prevention strategies and reduce the prevalence of corneal blindness in the developing world.

This review highlights the evolution in the scope of eye banking activities in India. The roles and responsibilities of the eye banks have expanded to match the requirements and necessities that arose because of advancements in keratoplasty techniques and the need for corneal surgeons. Adoption of different types of corneal preservation solutions and methods of donor cornea preservation was a consequence of the changing and unprecedented times. The growth of eye banking in India has been a commendable journey and has placed the country in an “almost sufficient” category in eye banking and corneal transplantation. There exists a potential to reach the status of cornea surplus country in the future. The rules and laws governing eye banking operations need dynamic amendments based on the trends in keratoplasty, surgical practice patterns, and status of self-sufficiency. Newer technological advances and quality measures must be adopted in donor cornea evaluation and tissue preparation. Research should be integrated as an important component of eye banking, especially in developing novel methods of donor preservation, and evaluating and validating the existing and changing practices of eye banking.

Purpose: To report on the surgical maneuvers recommended for a successful unfolding of very young donors in order to accomplish an uneventful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery. Methods: Five patients (three females and two males, mean age 71.2 ± 6.7 years) with Fuchs endothelial cell dystrophy who underwent DMEK with very young donors (between 20 and 30 years old) were included. The following demographic data were assessed: donor's age, donor's endothelial cell density (ECD), preservation time, recipient's age and sex and unfolding surgical time. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; decimal system), ECD and corneal central thickness (CCT) were assessed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Results: Donors' mean age was 23.6 ± 3.6 years (range 21 to 30) and the mean ECD was 2748.6 ± 162.6 cells/mm2. All of them underwent an uneventful DMEK as a single procedure performed by one experienced surgeon (MAG) with a mean unfolding time of 7.2 ± 4.9 min (range 4 to 15). The essential steps, including patient preparation as well as DMEK graft implantation, orientation, unrolling and centering are detailed. At 6 months, BCVA was 0.6 ± 0.2, ECD was 1945.0 ± 455.5 cells/mm2 and CCT was 497.0 ± 19.7 microns. Conclusions: We hereby present the keys to overcome tightly scrolled grafts of very young donors, which prove perfectly suitable for DMEK surgery. The graft shape tends towards a double-roll and specific maneuvers are strongly recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corneal blindness (CB) is one of the leading causes of blindness in India and globally, affecting around 8 million population worldwide. Many of these corneal blind patients may be visually rehabilitated by corneal transplantation (CT). Eye banking plays a crucial role in facilitating CT and ocular research. Many countries have adopted regulatory frameworks, quality assurance programs, and technological advancements to enhance the efficacy and safety of CT. Various infrastructural and organizational frameworks of eye banks (EBs) in India, according to the Eye Bank Association of India (EBAI), aid in establishing guidelines and standards for EB practices. Initiatives such as the National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB) have significantly contributed to eye donation rates and improved access to donor corneas. This review article discusses the established eye banking networks in countries such as India, the United States (USA), and Europe, where dedicated EB organizations work collaboratively to ensure efficient procurement, processing, and distribution of corneal tissue. It also highlights specific strategies employed in India and global countries to address EBs' challenges. These challenges include the shortage of donor corneas, improving donor screening and tissue processing techniques, ensuring timely distribution of corneal tissue, and maintaining high quality standards. Interestingly, the comparative analysis between India and other developed countries highlights the similarities and differences in eye banking strategies. By understanding the strategies employed by different regions, EBs can learn from each other's experiences and work toward achieving optimal outcomes in CT and ocular research worldwide. It underscores the importance of knowledge sharing and collaborative efforts in addressing common challenges and implementing best practices in eye banking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corneal blindness ranks third among the causes of blindness worldwide, after cataract and glaucoma. Corneal transplantation offers us a means to address this, and is currently the most commonly performed transplantation procedure worldwide -- restoring the gift of sight to many an eye. Eye banks play a very important role in these procedures. India was quick to develop its own eye bank in 1945 soon after the launch of world's first eye bank in 1944. The evolution over the past six decades has been tremendous, placing India on the top, with one of the largest eye-banking system in the world. As of 2023, around 740 members are registered under the Eye Bank Association of India. The highest-ever collection of 71,700 donor eyes was achieved in 2017-2018. The overall tissue utilisation rate ranged between 22 - 28 % for voluntary donations and 50% for hospital-based corneal retrieval programs. Though India has an excellent infrastructure and readiness for corneal transplantation surgery, the need of the hour is to create a strong and independent nodal system. It shall take care of the logistics and factor in technological advances -- surgical and otherwise. Public awareness, a national corneal grid, and reducing the red-tape barriers, shall improve availability of grafts nationwide. This review aims to detail the evolution of eye banking in India, to provide a comprehensive understanding, and help the stakeholders focus on the road ahead to attain our targets faster. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corneal blindness is an important contributor to the burden of global blindness and has a greater prevalence in low-income countries of the developing world where resources and infrastructure are limited. The causes of corneal blindness too are different from high-income countries and include infectious keratitis, ocular trauma, and xerophthalmia. Persons with these indications tend to have unfavourable outcomes after corneal transplantation, limiting their chances of benefitting from this sight-saving procedure. However, most causes of corneal blindness in the developing world are preventable. This highlights the importance of understanding the unique challenges in these regions and the need for targeted interventions. This article discusses various prevention strategies, including primordial, primary, and secondary prevention, aimed at reducing the burden of corneal blindness in low-income countries. These include capacity building, training, and awareness campaigns to reduce the risk factors of ocular trauma, infectious keratitis, and to improve access to first aid. It is also important to promote safe eye practices and tackle nutritional deficiencies through public health interventions and policy changes. Providing the required training to general ophthalmologists in the management of basic corneal surgeries and diseases and enhancing the accessibility of eye care services in rural areas will ensure early treatment and prevent sequelae. Current treatment modalities belong to the tertiary level of prevention and are largely limited to corneal transplantation. In developing nations, there is a scarcity of donor corneal tissue necessitating an urgent expansion of eye banking services. Alternative approaches to corneal transplantation such as 3D printed corneas, cultured stem cells, and biomaterials should also be explored to meet this demand. Thus, there is a need for collaborative efforts between healthcare professionals, policymakers, and communities to implement effective prevention strategies and reduce the prevalence of corneal blindness in the developing world.

Previous studies have suggested risk factors for graft dislocation after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). We aimed to investigate the influence of eye bank storage solution as a risk factor for graft dislocation, as this could have significant implications for eye banking practices. This retrospective analysis compared cohorts from the QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Canada (donor corneas preserved in Optisol GS) and the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (donor corneas preserved in organ culture). Patient, surgical, and post-operative data were collected for consecutive DSAEK surgeries performed between 2012 and 2020. Risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling. 654 DSAEK surgeries were performed during the study period: 271 in the Optisol GS storage cohort and 383 in the organ culture cohort. The most common indications were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, and failed previous DSAEK. The incidence of graft dislocation requiring surgical repositioning was 9.6% (n = 26) in the Optisol GS cohort and 12.0% (n = 46) in the organ culture cohort (OR, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.20–1.13). Development of graft dislocation was associated with intraoperative venting incisions (OR, 2.50, 95% CI, 1.12–5.51) and a post-operative wound leak (OR, 55.24, 95% CI, 10.20–514.85). The incidence of DSAEK dislocation was similar between study sites using Optisol GS and organ culture, suggesting changes in eye bank storage solution would not mitigate this post-operative complication. Intraoperative creation of venting incisions and post-operative wound leaks and were factors associated with graft dislocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corneal blindness (CB) is one of the leading causes of blindness in India and globally, affecting around 8 million population worldwide. Many of these corneal blind patients may be visually rehabilitated by corneal transplantation (CT). Eye banking plays a crucial role in facilitating CT and ocular research. Many countries have adopted regulatory frameworks, quality assurance programs, and technological advancements to enhance the efficacy and safety of CT. Various infrastructural and organizational frameworks of eye banks (EBs) in India, according to the Eye Bank Association of India (EBAI), aid in establishing guidelines and standards for EB practices. Initiatives such as the National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB) have significantly contributed to eye donation rates and improved access to donor corneas. This review article discusses the established eye banking networks in countries such as India, the United States (USA), and Europe, where dedicated EB organizations work collaboratively to ensure efficient procurement, processing, and distribution of corneal tissue. It also highlights specific strategies employed in India and global countries to address EBs' challenges. These challenges include the shortage of donor corneas, improving donor screening and tissue processing techniques, ensuring timely distribution of corneal tissue, and maintaining high-quality standards. Interestingly, the comparative analysis between India and other developed countries highlights the similarities and differences in eye banking strategies. By understanding the strategies employed by different regions, EBs can learn from each other's experiences and work toward achieving optimal outcomes in CT and ocular research worldwide. It underscores the importance of knowledge sharing and collaborative efforts in addressing common challenges and implementing best practices in eye banking.

Corneal blindness ranks third among the causes of blindness worldwide, after cataract and glaucoma. Corneal transplantation offers us a means to address this, and is currently the most commonly performed transplantation procedure worldwide – restoring the gift of sight to many an eye. Eye banks play a very important role in these procedures. India was quick to develop its own eye bank in 1945 soon after the launch of world's first eye bank in 1944. The evolution over the past six decades has been tremendous, placing India on the top, with one of the largest eye-banking system in the world. As of 2023, around 740 members are registered under the Eye Bank Association of India. The highest-ever collection of 71,700 donor eyes was achieved in 2017-2018. The overall tissue utilisation rate ranged between 22 - 28 % for voluntary donations and 50% for hospital-based corneal retrieval programs. Though India has an excellent infrastructure and readiness for corneal transplantation surgery, the need of the hour is to create a strong and independent nodal system. It shall take care of the logistics and factor in technological advances – surgical and otherwise. Public awareness, a national corneal grid, and reducing the red-tape barriers, shall improve availability of grafts nationwide. This review aims to detail the evolution of eye banking in India, to provide a comprehensive understanding, and help the stakeholders focus on the road ahead to attain our targets faster.

To determine the effectiveness of two methods to improve the microbial safety of human corneas preserved in organ culture. We compared the number of positive preservation solutions of corneas in organ culture in which the initial short-term hypothermic corneal maintenance solution was supplemented with amphotericin B 2.5 µg/mL and the historical data of microbial test results (2015–2019). In addition, we appraised the efficacy of Gram stain to detect bacterial or fungal contamination in the organ culture solutions of corneas from at-risk donors compared to the culture tests of corneas from not-at-risk donors. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA and statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The number of positive culture tests after preservation was 15 (0.5%) in 2020 compared to a mean of 37 (1.2%) in the period 2015–2019 (p < 0.01), with 10 (1.0%) positive samples in the cohort of 998 corneas from at-risk donors and 5 (0.2%) in the 2046 corneas from not-at-risk donors (p < 0.01). All corneas from at-risk donors tested positive at Gram stain and the results were available 1–3 days before those of the conventional culture tests. Amphotericin B supplementation in the short-term maintenance solution markedly reduced the number of positive microbial tests after organ culture and the early detection of contaminants, including slow-growing microorganisms, by Gram stain before the standard culture results. This meant fewer corneas being discarded and a greater likelihood of preventing post-graft infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melissa Dal Pizzol,1,2 Eduarda Correa Freitas,2 Claudete Locatelli,2 Felipe Guareze,2 Paula Reginatto,3 Gabriella Machado,3 Alexandre Fuentefria,3 Diane Marinho1,2 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina: Ciências Cirúrgicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 2Ophthalmology Department, Hospital De Clínicas De Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, BrazilCorrespondence: Melissa Dal PizzolOphthalmology Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Zona 17, Porto Alegre, CEP 90035-903, RS, BrazilTel +55 5133598306Email melissadalpizzol@hotmail.comPurpose: The incidence of fungal infection after corneal transplant has increased significantly in recent years, especially Candida spp. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of cycloheximide in Optisol-GS media in decreasing the growth of Candida spp. strains.Methods: This in vitro laboratory efficacy study measured fungal colony growth in 24 vials of Optisol-GS that were divided into 6 groups of 4 vials each, as follows: (1) MIC/2 cycloheximide, (2) MIC cycloheximide, (3) MICx5 cycloheximide, (4) MICx10 cycloheximide, from MIC values obtained for each strain, (5) unsupplemented optisol-GS as a positive control (added inoculum), and (6) unsupplemented optisol-GS as a negative control (no inoculum). In each group was added Candida albicans, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis, except in the negative control. The evaluated variables were fungal colony growth from the Optisol-GS vials, corneal endothelial cell density and endothelial cell viability at different concentrations of cycloheximide.Results: In the efficacy study, all strains showed a reduction in fungal cell growth from the second day at all evaluated concentrations of optisol-GS supplemented with cycloheximide, even at subinhibitory concentrations (MIC/2). For C. glabrata, the colony count was reduced to 99%. No evidence of corneal endothelial toxicity was found at any concentration, in the safety study, compared with the paired control.Conclusion: The addition of cycloheximide to optisol-GS decreased the fungal growth, demonstrating fungicide action against C. glabrata and fungistatic action against C. albicans and C.parapsilosis. This drug did not demonstrate toxicity to the corneal endothelium at different concentrations.Keywords: cornea, eye banking, infection, pharmacology

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine whether donor age, death‐to‐retrieval time (DRT) and death‐to‐preservation time (DPT) as well as total preservation time affect donor cornea suitability for endothelial keratoplasty (EK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods: A registry‐based study was performed identifying 3248 corneas donated between 2011 and 2017. Data regarding donated corneas were extracted from The Danish Cornea Bank and donor medical records and evaluated for missing information. The primary outcome was whether ECD at preservation (ECD‐P) or at release (ECD‐R) was >2000 cells/mm2. Results: Logistic regression for ECD‐P showed a significant negative effect of increasing age (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.05;1.08, p < 0.001) on donor suitability. Higher ECD‐P had a significant positive effect on graft eligibility (OR: 1.007 95%CI: 1.003;1.010, p < 0.001). No significant effect of donor sex (p = 0.547), DRT (p = 0.289) or DPT (p = 0.102) on donor suitability for EK or PK (Chi‐squared test). Conclusion: High donor age and low ECD‐P negatively affect the suitability of donor corneas for EK/PK whereas DRT and DPT did not affect graft suitability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corneal blindness is the fourth leading cause of blindness worldwide, with 10 million people having bilateral corneal blindness, nearly 80% of all corneal blindness cases are avoidable and are reversible. Corneal transplantation (CT) is the most frequently performed type of transplant across the world. This review was conducted with the objective of identifying if it is safe to harvest the cornea from the patients died due to COVID-19 and preventing the chances of transmission from donor to the recipient or healthcare worker handling the harvested cornea. A total of 45 articles were found with the keywords and out of all, only 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. RT-PCR is the technique of choice for detection of virus in the corpse and the sample analyzed was a pharyngeal swab. Available literature states unavailability of sufficient evidence-based studies proving presence of virus in the cornea or tear of COVID affected patients There is no proven consensus on presence of Virus in cornea. It is important to follow preferred practice guidelines so as to restart eye banking and do at least the emergency surgeries without having risk of disease transmission and keeping ourselves safe.

Since the outbreak of respiratory coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, there is an ongoing discussion about whether the virus could be transmitted through corneal transplantation from donor to recipient. The purpose of this review was to summarize the current knowledge in the scientific community to provide aid in risk evaluation for potential virus transfer by corneal transplants. Literature was searched in PubMed.gov for relevant articles on coronavirus in conjunction with cornea processing, cornea transplantation and eye banking. Further, guidelines of health authorities and eye banking associations were reviewed. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected in ocular swabs and/or fluid of patients with COVID-19. However, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus transmission through these ocular tissues or fluid of patients is judged differently. To date, per literature and official guidelines, no evidence of viable virus in ocular tissue and no cases of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via tissue preparations have been reported.

Purpose: This study aimed to share our experience in the hospital cornea retrieval program as a new eye bank. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care institute from August 26, 2019 to March 22, 2020. The medical and eye bank records were analyzed for hospital mortality, mortuary records, and donors approached. The corneal collection was divided between Voluntary (received from voluntary calls), HCRP (cornea received from hospital deaths), and Medico-Legal Cases (received from MLC deaths in hospital) to see the trend of donation and utilization over time. Results: During the study period, 154 corneas (77 pairs) were collected. The HCRP provided a major source of corneas 58.4% (90 corneas) as compared to voluntary 19.5% (30 corneas) and MLC 22.1%(34 corneas). There were younger tissues in MLC than HCRP donors, and older tissues in Voluntary donors, and the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the quality of optical grade tissues and the utilization of corneas for transplants between the three groups. Post hoc analysis showed more non-optical tissues in the voluntary donations (P = 0.004), maximum donors with medical contraindications in the HCRP group (P = 0.001), and time-lapse in corneal retrieval in MLC cases (P = 0.0001). Of these 154 corneas, 78 (50.6%) were assessed as suitable for transplantation, of which 59 (75.6%) tissues were optical grade tissues. The overall utilization was 39.6%. Conclusion: HCRP is indeed challenging for a new eye bank, but proper understanding and implementing strategies may help for good utilization of tissues.

Purpose: To determine the postmortem positivity for COVID-19 among voluntary eye donors who had been certified to have died of non-COVID-19 causes. Methods: All donors who donated their corneas (from March 2021 onward) were assessed for COVID-19 positivity tested by nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Relevant screening history was taken prior to collection. Strict precautions were taken during the retrieval as per the guidelines issued by the National Program for Control of Blindness and Visual Impairment and the Eye Bank Association of India, and the tissues were handled as per standard operating protocol. Results: 85 eye calls were attended during this period, of which 56 were home-based and 29 were from a hospital setting. Samples from 12 of the former group of donors were found to be positive for COVID-19 (14%). Conclusion: This study highlights the possibility of postmortem RT-PCR positivity in voluntary corneal tissue donors without a prior history of symptoms, signs, or diagnosis of illness suggestive of COVID-19. It is recommended that postmortem testing of donors should be done by RT-PCR for retrievals made during the pandemic.

Purpose: In India, COVID-19 infected more than 10 million and caused more than 148,000 fatalities during 2020. Due to “lockdown” eye banks were shuttered in March, 2020 and reopened for operations in the month of May, 2020. This study assesses the immediate impact of the pandemic on eye banking and cornea transplantation in India. Methods: Data was gathered through an online survey of the eye banks and cornea surgeons in India. The questionnaire collected information on the vital statistics of eye bank operations and cornea transplants for the period from March to June for the years 2019 and 2020. Results: 47 eye banks responded to the survey. Collectively in the March–May 2020 period, corneas collected and transplanted declined by 78.27% and 79.14%, respectively, compared to the same period of 2019. In June 2020, the first full month after operations restarted, the collection and transplants were respectively, 82.10% and 81.82%, lower than June, 2019. Long-term glycerine preservation of corneas in the period from March to June 2020 increased by 124.5% compared to same period in 2019, but overall only 5.26% of the corneas recovered were preserved in this way. 44.44% of the eye banks collected corneas only from donors with negative COVID-19 diagnosis. 36.11% of the respondents rejected all suspicious cases, such as donors with respiratory pathologies, and 2.78% of the respondents accepted donations from medico legal cases only. 19.44% of the responding eye banks did SARS-CoV-2 nasal swab test for the deceased donor. 79.5% of the eye banks reported that staff were willing to work during the pandemic, and 82.05% eye banks gave special training to staff before restarting services. Conclusion: Due to the steep decline in collections and transplants, 2020 can be termed as a lost year in Indian eye banking. Attention to Hospital Cornea Recovery Programs, continuous situation monitoring, and ongoing staff training programs are recommended.

Purpose: To describe the impact of lockdown and unlock phases of the COVID-19 pandemic on keratoplasty trends at a tertiary eye care center in India. Methods: This cross-sectional hospital-based study included 6,277 patients presenting between March 25, 2017 and March 31, 2021. The data of the patients who underwent keratoplasty during the lockdown and unlock phases were compared with the respective periods in the previous three years before COVID-19. Results: During the year one of pandemic, there was a 29.46% decline in the total number of keratoplasty performed at the institute compared to previous year's annual numbers. The patients undergoing keratoplasty decreased by 90.28% (28/288) of pre-COVID-19 volumes during the lockdown phase. This was mainly because of a 40.6% reduction in the proportion of patients requiring interstate travel. There was complete recovery in the number of patients undergoing keratoplasty to 129.27% (184/142) of pre-COVID-19 volumes by March 2021. This gradual incremental trend was seen across all types of keratoplasty in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (135.29%), penetrating keratoplasty (117.6%), therapeutic keratoplasty (122.22%), anterior lamellar keratoplasty (150%), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (141.18%) by March 2021 with the gradual ease of lockdown regulations. The eye bank affiliated to the institute saw a 55.44% decline in donor cornea collection and an increase in utilization rate from 58.12% in previous years to 83.78% in year one of the pandemic. The overall eye bank donor cornea collection recovered to 86.96% (627/721) and tissue utilization increased by 109.99% (455/414) by March 2021. Conclusion: The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic saw an overall reduction of 29.46% of the patients undergoing keratoplasty at the institute. There was a gradual and incremental increase in all types of keratoplasty in the unlock phase, which surpassed the preceding years' monthly numbers in February and March.

Purpose: To analyze the quality of tissues and outcome of corneal transplants from tissues harvested from the donors of organophosphorus poisoning victims. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on corneas harvested from organophosphorus poisoning victims between January 2016 and December 2018. Details of quality of tissues and outcome following keratoplasty were collected from the eye bank and outpatient records, respectively. Results: Four hundred and seventy-eight donor corneas were collected from the victims of organophosphorus poisoning during the study period. The mean age of the donor was 38.8 ± 16.5 years. The mean donor-to-preservation time was 6.2 ± 3.2 hours. The mean endothelial cell density on specular microscopy was 2986.5 ± 369.0 cells/mm2. Four hundred and twenty-two (88.2%) donor corneas were utilized. Of the 121 corneas utilized at our institute for transplantation, 73 and 48 corneas were for optical and therapeutic/tectonic indications, respectively. Of the 73 optical grafts, 25 patients were lost-to-follow-up and 58.3% (28/48) who came for one-year follow-up were found to be clear. Conclusion: Donor corneas retrieved from organophosphorus poisoning are safe for transplantation. The postoperative outcome of the tissue utilized from these donors is satisfactory.

Purpose: To examine the utilization patterns of cornea procured from diseased individuals ≥75 years of age at an eye bank in western India.Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 1,217 eyes of 653 donors with age ≥75 years were reviewed from October 2008 to December 2019. Donor age, lens status, endothelial cell count (ECD), utilization of the tissue for transplantation or non-clinical purposes (e.g., research, training/discarded), and causes of non-utilization were noted.Results: The mean age of the donors was 80.9 ± 4.6 years and the tissue utilization rate was 36.5% (445 out of 1,217 eyes). The eyes used for keratoplasty procedures had a lower donor age (79.6 ± 5.7 vs. 81.5 ± 5.1; P < 0.001), a higher endothelial cell count (2493 ± 531 vs. 2034 ± 581; P < 0.001), and were more often phakic (61% vs. 36.6%) compared to the unused group. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the likelihood of tissue utilization for keratoplasty was 13% higher with every 100-cell increment in donor ECD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10-1.16, P < 0.001) and 33% lower with having a pseudophakic status in the donor eye (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.87, P = 0.03). Age was not a significant determinant of tissue utilization when used in the same multivariable model.Conclusion: More than one-third of the eyes (36.5%) can be utilized even when the donors are above 75 years of age. Eyes that were more likely to be utilized for keratoplasty were phakic and had a significantly higher ECD; age was not a determinant in tissue utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recovery and access to end‐of‐life corneal tissue for corneal transplantation, training and research is globally maldistributed. The reasons for the maldistribution are complex and multifaceted, and not well defined or understood. Currently there are few solutions available to effectively address these issues. This review provides an overview of the system, key issues impacting recovery and allocation and emphasises how end‐user ophthalmologists and researchers, with support from administrators and the wider sector, can assist in increasing access long‐term through sustaining eye banks nationally and globally. We posit that prevention measures and improved surgical techniques, together with the development of novel therapies will play a significant role in reducing demand and enhance the equitable allocation of corneas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In India, COVID-19 infected more than 10 million and caused more than 148,000 fatalities during 2020. Due to "lockdown" eye banks were shuttered in March, 2020 and reopened for operations in the month of May, 2020. This study assesses the immediate impact of the pandemic on eye banking and cornea transplantation in India. Methods: Data was gathered through an online survey of the eye banks and cornea surgeons in India. The questionnaire collected information on the vital statistics of eye bank operations and cornea transplants for the period from March to June for the years 2019 and 2020. Results: 47 eye banks responded to the survey. Collectively in the March–May 2020 period, corneas collected and transplanted declined by 78.27% and 79.14%, respectively, compared to the same period of 2019. In June 2020, the first full month after operations restarted, the collection and transplants were respectively, 82.10% and 81.82%, lower than June, 2019. Long-term glycerine preservation of corneas in the period from March to June 2020 increased by 124.5% compared to same period in 2019, but overall only 5.26% of the corneas recovered were preserved in this way. 44.44% of the eye banks collected corneas only from donors with negative COVID-19 diagnosis. 36.11% of the respondents rejected all suspicious cases, such as donors with respiratory pathologies, and 2.78% of the respondents accepted donations from medico legal cases only. 19.44% of the responding eye banks did SARS-CoV-2 nasal swab test for the deceased donor. 79.5% of the eye banks reported that staff were willing to work during the pandemic, and 82.05% eye banks gave special training to staff before restarting services. Conclusion: Due to the steep decline in collections and transplants, 2020 can be termed as a lost year in Indian eye banking. Attention to Hospital Cornea Recovery Programs, continuous situation monitoring, and ongoing staff training programs are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the impact of lockdown and unlock phases of the COVID-19 pandemic on keratoplasty trends at a tertiary eye care center in India. Methods: This cross-sectional hospital-based study included 6,277 patients presenting between March 25, 2017 and March 31, 2021. The data of the patients who underwent keratoplasty during the lockdown and unlock phases were compared with the respective periods in the previous three years before COVID-19. Results: During the year one of pandemic, there was a 29.46% decline in the total number of keratoplasty performed at the institute compared to previous year's annual numbers. The patients undergoing keratoplasty decreased by 90.28% (28/288) of pre-COVID-19 volumes during the lockdown phase. This was mainly because of a 40.6% reduction in the proportion of patients requiring interstate travel. There was complete recovery in the number of patients undergoing keratoplasty to 129.27% (184/142) of pre-COVID-19 volumes by March 2021. This gradual incremental trend was seen across all types of keratoplasty in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (135.29%), penetrating keratoplasty (117.6%), therapeutic keratoplasty (122.22%), anterior lamellar keratoplasty (150%), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (141.18%) by March 2021 with the gradual ease of lockdown regulations. The eye bank affiliated to the institute saw a 55.44% decline in donor cornea collection and an increase in utilization rate from 58.12% in previous years to 83.78% in year one of the pandemic. The overall eye bank donor cornea collection recovered to 86.96% (627/721) and tissue utilization increased by 109.99% (455/414) by March 2021. Conclusion: The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic saw an overall reduction of 29.46% of the patients undergoing keratoplasty at the institute. There was a gradual and incremental increase in all types of keratoplasty in the unlock phase, which surpassed the preceding years' monthly numbers in February and March. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyze the quality of tissues and outcome of corneal transplants from tissues harvested from the donors of organophosphorus poisoning victims.Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on corneas harvested from organophosphorus poisoning victims between January 2016 and December 2018. Details of quality of tissues and outcome following keratoplasty were collected from the eye bank and outpatient records, respectively.Results: Four hundred and seventy-eight donor corneas were collected from the victims of organophosphorus poisoning during the study period. The mean age of the donor was 38.8 ± 16.5 years. The mean donor-to-preservation time was 6.2 ± 3.2 hours. The mean endothelial cell density on specular microscopy was 2986.5 ± 369.0 cells/mm2. Four hundred and twenty-two (88.2%) donor corneas were utilized. Of the 121 corneas utilized at our institute for transplantation, 73 and 48 corneas were for optical and therapeutic/tectonic indications, respectively. Of the 73 optical grafts, 25 patients were lost-to-follow-up and 58.3% (28/48) who came for one-year follow-up were found to be clear.Conclusion: Donor corneas retrieved from organophosphorus poisoning are safe for transplantation. The postoperative outcome of the tissue utilized from these donors is satisfactory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper peruses one of the most challenging healthcare concerns related to human organ transplantation. In this regard, a medical system's health-economic objectives are investigated to (1) achieve a desirable level of health equity in offering healthcare services to patients who are differentiated in terms of medical conditions, and (2) minimize total costs incurred across managing the inventory. This paper presents the first-ever operational research study to manage processed corneal tissue (PCT). Besides, hybrid demand-oriented policies have been proposed to equitably issue and assign specific inventories to demands with distinct medical urgent levels (ULs). In this regard, a practical multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming (MOMILP) model is proposed for a system with multiple products that can be substituted with each other according to medical priorities. A goal programming (GP) approach is utilized to find the optimum solution. The applicability of the model is validated through a real case study. Finally, several sensitivity analyses are conducted to examine the effect of critical parameters on the solutions to gain useful managerial insights. The results show that the proposed health-economic trade-off is well performed and can efficiently handle the real case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown on patient care at a tertiary-care ophthalmology institute. Methods: Records of all the patients who presented from March 25th to May 3rd, 2020 were scanned to evaluate the details regarding the presenting complaints, diagnosis, advised treatment and surgical interventions. Results: The number of outpatient department visits, retinal laser procedures, intravitreal injections and cataract surgeries during this lockdown decreased by 96.5%, 96.5%, 98.7% and 99.7% respectively compared from the corresponding time last year. Around 38.8% patients could be triaged as non-emergency cases based on history alone while 59.5% patients could be triaged as non-emergency cases after examination. Only eighty-four patients opted for video-consultation from April 15th to May 3rd, 2020. Nine patients presented with perforated corneal ulcer, but could not undergo penetrating keratoplasty due to the lack to available donor corneal tissue. One of these patients had to undergo evisceration due to disease progression. Two patients with open globe injury presented late after trauma and had to undergo enucleation. Around 9% patients could not undergo the advised urgent procedure due to logistical issues related to the lockdown. Conclusion: A significant number of patients could not get adequate treatment during the lockdown period. Hospitals need to build capacity to cater to the expected patient surge post-COVID-19-era, especially those requiring immediate in-person attention. A large number of patients can be classified as non-emergency cases. These patients need to be encouraged to follow-up via video-consultation to carve adequate in-person time for the high-risk patients.

The growth of eye banking in India was showing positive trends until the nation was hit by unprecedented times as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of this has led to a downward spiraling in eye banking activities globally. Several measures had to be implemented to tide over the crisis and strategies planned for future to prepare for the needs of corneal transplantation. While eye banks in India have been practicing short- term and intermediate storage preservation media, there is a definite need to evolve other methods of very long-term preservation. This review discusses various methods of long term corneal preservation, their relevance and applications in the present times. We reviewed relevant medical literature in English from PUBMED with the key words “Corneal preservation”, “Cryopreservation”, “Glycerol preservation”, Gamma Irradiation”, “Eye Banking” ,”COVID-19”.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought with it the huge burden of mortality and morbidity across the world and the added effects of the mandatory lockdown measures to try and control the spread. A number of aspects of healthcare including eye donation and eye collection require adequate safety precautions in place to keep both the involved healthcare workers and patients safe. This paper highlights the consensus-based guidelines by an expert panel on how to restart eye banking and eye collection services and carry out emergency corneal surgeries during this COVID-19 time. These guidelines will be applicable to all eye banks across the country and should help ophthalmologists and eye banking staff to restart eye banking while safeguarding themselves and their patients.

PurposeCorneal transplantations are the commonest allogenic transplant surgeries performed worldwide. Transplantable grade donor cornea is a finite resource. There is thus an impetus for eye banks to optimize the use of each harvested cornea, and clinicians to minimize the risks of graft rejection and failure. With better survival and lower rejection rates, anterior lamellar keratoplasty has gained popularity as an alternative technique to full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty, for the treatment of corneal stromal diseases. This study evaluated the effects of donor-recipient age- and sex-matching on the outcomes of eyes that had undergone deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) surgeries.DesignObservational cross-sectional study (national corneal graft registry data).SubjectsAll DALK surgeries performed in a tertiary ophthalmic hospital over an 11-year period.MethodsTo analyse the effects of donor-recipient sex-matching, transplantations were classified as “presumed H-Y incompatible” (male donor to female recipient) or “presumed H-Y compatible” (all other donor-recipient sex combinations). For age-matching, differences in donor and recipient ages were calculated. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate the influence of donor-recipient sex-matching and age-matching on graft failure and rejection.Main Outcome MeasuresRates of graft failure and rejection within each group.Results401 eyes were included. 271 (67.6%) transplants were presumed H-Y compatible. 29 (7.2%) grafts failed and 9 (2.2%) grafts rejected. There were trends of lower hazard ratios (HRs) in graft failure and rejection in the presumed H-Y compatible group [HRs: 0.59 (95% CI 0.20–1.77, p = 0.34) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.22–3.89, p = 0.926), respectively]. Median difference in age between recipients and donors was 15.0 years (IQR −2.8–34.3). The HRs of graft failure and rejection were not influenced by donor-recipient age [HRs per 1-year increase in age difference: 0.995 (95% CI 0.98–1.01, p = 0.483) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.99–1.03, p = 0.394), respectively].ConclusionIn eyes that had undergone DALK surgeries, no significant influence of donor-recipient sex- or age-matching on graft rejection and failure was observed. Without strong evidence and the limitations of obtaining sample sizes required for an adequately powered study, the benefits of sex- and age-matching of donors and recipients during graft allocation for DALK surgeries is currently inconclusive.

Purpose: To determine the postmortem positivity for COVID-19 among voluntary eye donors who had been certified to have died of non-COVID-19 causes. Methods: All donors who donated their corneas (from March 2021 onward) were assessed for COVID-19 positivity tested by nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Relevant screening history was taken prior to collection. Strict precautions were taken during the retrieval as per the guidelines issued by the National Program for Control of Blindness and Visual Impairment and the Eye Bank Association of India, and the tissues were handled as per standard operating protocol. Results: 85 eye calls were attended during this period, of which 56 were home-based and 29 were from a hospital setting. Samples from 12 of the former group of donors were found to be positive for COVID-19 (14%). Conclusion: This study highlights the possibility of postmortem RT-PCR positivity in voluntary corneal tissue donors without a prior history of symptoms, signs, or diagnosis of illness suggestive of COVID-19. It is recommended that postmortem testing of donors should be done by RT-PCR for retrievals made during the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The detection of corneas operated on for refractive surgery [LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)] will become a major concern for eye banks in the coming years because this surgery is often forgotten during the interview with the deceased's relatives. We present here 2 corneas operated on with PKR and stored successively in organ culture (OC) and in the active storage machine (ASM) that restores intraocular pressure, restores the cornea to its original shape, respects transparency and incorporates non-invasive controls. The 2 corneas of a 49-year-old donor operated 17 years earlier by PRK for -2 and -3 diopters myopia were stored in OC for 14 days and then placed in ASM for 48 h. Thickness map and OCT topography were performed under the 2 storage conditions, histology and electron microscopy were then performed. Traces of PRK remained unnoticed in OC while they were evident in ASM with central epithelial anomaly, central thinning and flattening of central keratometry shown by OCT. Histology and ultrastructure confirmed the absence of Bowman's membrane in the center. By placing the cornea under physiological conditions, and in particular by triggering its deswelling and by restoring its natural curvature, the ASM allows effective detection of subtle refractive surgery traces like those present after PRK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on keratoplasty and Eye Banking in India. Methods: An e-mail survey was conducted among cornea surgeons and eye bankers of India. Participants were asked to report their practice patterns for the management of corneal perforation during lockdown, different preservative media used during and before lockdown, and waiting time and waiting time before COVID-19 lockdown. Results: Eight of 20 eye banks did not collect corneal tissue during April–June 2020; in contrast, 9 eye banks used to collect around 100 corneas per month during pre-COVID-19 time. Two-third of the surgeons (66.1%, n = 41/62) did not perform any corneal tissue transplant between April and June 2020. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive application was the most commonly, performed procedure (79%, n = 49/62) for tectonic purpose during this period. Glycerol was the most preferred alternative preservation method considered by both the groups. More than half of the surgeons (64.5%, n = 40/62) had an average waiting time of

Since the outbreak of respiratory coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, there is an ongoing discussion about whether the virus could be transmitted through corneal transplantation from donor to recipient. The purpose of this review was to summarize the current knowledge in the scientific community to provide aid in risk evaluation for potential virus transfer by corneal transplants. Literature was searched in PubMed.gov for relevant articles on coronavirus in conjunction with cornea processing, cornea transplantation and eye banking. Further, guidelines of health authorities and eye banking associations were reviewed. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected in ocular swabs and/or fluid of patients with COVID-19. However, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus transmission through these ocular tissues or fluid of patients is judged differently. To date, per literature and official guidelines, no evidence of viable virus in ocular tissue and no cases of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via tissue preparations have been reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to share our experience in the hospital cornea retrieval program as a new eye bank.Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care institute from August 26, 2019 to March 22, 2020. The medical and eye bank records were analyzed for hospital mortality, mortuary records, and donors approached. The corneal collection was divided between Voluntary (received from voluntary calls), HCRP (cornea received from hospital deaths), and Medico-Legal Cases (received from MLC deaths in hospital) to see the trend of donation and utilization over time.Results: During the study period, 154 corneas (77 pairs) were collected. The HCRP provided a major source of corneas 58.4% (90 corneas) as compared to voluntary 19.5% (30 corneas) and MLC 22.1%(34 corneas). There were younger tissues in MLC than HCRP donors, and older tissues in Voluntary donors, and the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the quality of optical grade tissues and the utilization of corneas for transplants between the three groups. Post hoc analysis showed more non-optical tissues in the voluntary donations (P = 0.004), maximum donors with medical contraindications in the HCRP group (P = 0.001), and time-lapse in corneal retrieval in MLC cases (P = 0.0001). Of these 154 corneas, 78 (50.6%) were assessed as suitable for transplantation, of which 59 (75.6%) tissues were optical grade tissues. The overall utilization was 39.6%.Conclusion: HCRP is indeed challenging for a new eye bank, but proper understanding and implementing strategies may help for good utilization of tissues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]