1. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing excludes significant disease in patients recovering from COVID-19.
- Author
-
Holdsworth DA, Barker-Davies RM, Chamley RR, O'Sullivan O, Ladlow P, May S, Houston AD, Mulae J, Xie C, Cranley M, Sellon E, Naylor J, Halle M, Parati G, Davos C, Rider OJ, Bennett AB, and Nicol ED
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, SARS-CoV-2, Military Personnel statistics & numerical data, Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, COVID-19 complications, COVID-19 physiopathology, COVID-19 diagnosis, Exercise Test methods, Exercise Test statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Objective: Post-COVID-19 syndrome presents a health and economic challenge affecting ~10% of patients recovering from COVID-19. Accurate assessment of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome is complicated by health anxiety and coincident symptomatic autonomic dysfunction. We sought to determine whether either symptoms or objective cardiopulmonary exercise testing could predict clinically significant findings., Methods: 113 consecutive military patients were assessed in a comprehensive clinical pathway. This included symptom reporting, history, examination, spirometry, echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in all, with chest CT, dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography and cardiac MRI where indicated. Symptoms, CPET findings and presence/absence of significant pathology were reviewed. Data were analysed to identify diagnostic strategies that may be used to exclude significant disease., Results: 7/113 (6%) patients had clinically significant disease adjudicated by cardiothoracic multidisciplinary team (MDT). These patients had reduced fitness (V̇O
2 26.7 (±5.1) vs 34.6 (±7.0) mL/kg/min; p=0.002) and functional capacity (peak power 200 (±36) vs 247 (±55) W; p=0.026) compared with those without significant disease. Simple CPET criteria (oxygen uptake (V̇O2 ) >100% predicted and minute ventilation (VE)/carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO2 ) slope <30.0 or VE/V̇CO2 slope <35.0 in isolation) excluded significant disease with sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 83%, respectively (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.89). The addition of capillary blood gases to estimate alveolar-arterial gradient improved diagnostic performance to 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity (AUC 0.92). Symptoms and spirometry did not discriminate significant disease., Conclusions: In a population recovering from SARS-CoV-2, there is reassuringly little organ pathology. CPET and functional capacity testing, but not reported symptoms, permit the exclusion of clinically significant disease., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF