Back to Search Start Over

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing excludes significant disease in patients recovering from COVID-19.

Authors :
Holdsworth DA
Barker-Davies RM
Chamley RR
O'Sullivan O
Ladlow P
May S
Houston AD
Mulae J
Xie C
Cranley M
Sellon E
Naylor J
Halle M
Parati G
Davos C
Rider OJ
Bennett AB
Nicol ED
Source :
BMJ military health [BMJ Mil Health] 2024 Jul 24; Vol. 170 (4), pp. 308-314. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 24.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Post-COVID-19 syndrome presents a health and economic challenge affecting ~10% of patients recovering from COVID-19. Accurate assessment of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome is complicated by health anxiety and coincident symptomatic autonomic dysfunction. We sought to determine whether either symptoms or objective cardiopulmonary exercise testing could predict clinically significant findings.<br />Methods: 113 consecutive military patients were assessed in a comprehensive clinical pathway. This included symptom reporting, history, examination, spirometry, echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in all, with chest CT, dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography and cardiac MRI where indicated. Symptoms, CPET findings and presence/absence of significant pathology were reviewed. Data were analysed to identify diagnostic strategies that may be used to exclude significant disease.<br />Results: 7/113 (6%) patients had clinically significant disease adjudicated by cardiothoracic multidisciplinary team (MDT). These patients had reduced fitness (V̇O <subscript>2</subscript> 26.7 (±5.1) vs 34.6 (±7.0) mL/kg/min; p=0.002) and functional capacity (peak power 200 (±36) vs 247 (±55) W; p=0.026) compared with those without significant disease. Simple CPET criteria (oxygen uptake (V̇O <subscript>2</subscript> ) >100% predicted and minute ventilation (VE)/carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO <subscript>2</subscript> ) slope <30.0 or VE/V̇CO <subscript>2</subscript> slope <35.0 in isolation) excluded significant disease with sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 83%, respectively (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.89). The addition of capillary blood gases to estimate alveolar-arterial gradient improved diagnostic performance to 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity (AUC 0.92). Symptoms and spirometry did not discriminate significant disease.<br />Conclusions: In a population recovering from SARS-CoV-2, there is reassuringly little organ pathology. CPET and functional capacity testing, but not reported symptoms, permit the exclusion of clinically significant disease.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2633-3775
Volume :
170
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ military health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36442889
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2022-002193