Search

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) encompass a group of disorders characterized by an abnormal accumulation of eosinophils in various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. EGIDs present with a wide range of symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, difficulty swallowing, and food impaction. Monoclonal antibodies, targeting inflammatory cytokines or eosinophils, are the next emerging therapy for EGIDs. The only Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody is dupilumab, and it has been approved for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). In this article, the authors will discuss biologics that have been used in the treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To evaluate real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the United States., Methods: Retrospective case-control cohort analysis of Optum Clinformatics claims data (January 2008-September 2020) comparing unadjusted and adjusted HCRU (visits per 1,000 patients per month) and all-cause costs (per patient per month)., Results: Patients with EoE incurred significantly higher monthly HCRU (adjusted Δ [95% confidence interval]: inpatient visits, 2.8 [0.1-4.0]; emergency department visits, 14.7 [4.3-32.1]; outpatient visits, 388.8 [362.1-418.0]); and costs ($581 [$421-$600]) vs matched controls (all P < 0.001)., Discussion: EoE imposes substantial economic burden. More effective and targeted treatments that improve outcomes for patients are needed., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Because young children cannot self-report symptoms, there is a need for parent surrogate reports. Although early work suggested parent-child alignment for eosinophil esophagitis (EoE) patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the longitudinal alignment is unclear., Objective: We sought to assess the agreement and longitudinal stability of PROs between children with EoE and their parents., Methods: A total of 292 parent-child respondents completed 723 questionnaires over 5 years in an observational trial in the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers. The change in and agreement between parent and child Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score version 2 (PEESSv2.0) and Pediatric Quality of Life Eosinophilic Esophagitis Module (PedsQL-EoE) PROs over time were assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Clinical factors influencing PROs and their agreement were evaluated using linear mixed models., Results: The cohort had a median disease duration equaling 3.7 years and was predominantly male (73.6%) and White (85.3%). Child and parent PEESSv2.0 response groups were identified and were stable over time. There was strong correlation between child and parent reports (PEESSv2.0, 0.83;PedsQL-EoE, 0.74), with minimal pairwise differences for symptoms. Longitudinally, parent-reported PedsQL-EoE scores were stable (P ≥ .32), whereas child-reported PedsQL-EoE scores improved (P = .026). A larger difference in parent and child PedsQL-EoE reports was associated with younger age (P < .001), and differences were driven by psychosocial PRO domains., Conclusions: There is strong longitudinal alignment between child and parent reports using EoE PROs. These data provide evidence that parent report is a stable proxy for objective EoE symptoms in their children., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement CEGIR (U54 AI117804) is part of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network, an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and is funded through a collaboration between NIAID, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and NCATS and funded in part by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID. CEGIR is also supported by patient advocacy groups including the American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases, and Eosinophilic Family Coalition. As a member of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network, CEGIR is supported by its Data Management and Coordinating Center (grant no. U2CTR002818). Funding support for the Data Management and Coordinating Center is provided by NCATS and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. G.S.H. is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant no. K23 DK131341). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. E. Rothenberg is a consultant for Pulm One, Spoon Guru, ClostraBio, Serpin Pharm, Allakos, Celldex, Nexstone One, Santa Ana Bio, EnZen Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron/Sanofi, Revolo Biotherapeutics, and Guidepoint and has an equity interest in the first 9 listed; receives royalties from Teva Pharmaceuticals (reslizumab), Mapi Research Trust (PEESSv2.0), and UpToDate; and is an inventor of patents owned by Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. J. M. Spergel is a consultant for ReadySetfood, Regeneron/Sanofi, and ARS Pharma; has grant support from Novartis, Regeneron/Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), and NIH; receives royalties from UpToDate; and serves on the Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Alladapt and NIAID. M. H. Collins is a consultant for Allakos, Arena/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Calypso Biotech, EsoCap Biotech, GlaxoSmithKline, Receptos/Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc/Alimentiv, Inc, and Shire/Takeda. S. S Aceves is a consultant and an educational speaker for Regeneron/Sanofi; has grant support from the NIH, Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Implicit Biosciences; and is a coinventor of oral viscous budesonide patented by the University of California San Diego and licensed by Takeda. M. Pletneva is a consultant for Allakos. S. K. Gupta is a consultant and/or Data Safety and Monitoring Board member for Adare, Bristol Myers Squibb, QOL, Takeda, Medscape, PVI, ViaSkin, and UpToDate; and receives research support from Allakos, Ellodi, and AstraZeneca. J. B. Wechsler is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Ellodi, AstraZeneca, Allakos, and Regeneron/Sanofi; and receives research support from Regeneron. N. Gonsalves is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Allakos, Sanofi/Regeneron, AbbVie, Knopp, and Bristol Myers Squibb; is on the speaker bureau for Sanofi/Regeneron; and receives publication royalties from UpToDate. G. W. Falk is a consultant for Allakos, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Adare/Ellodi, Nexstone, Upstream Bio, and Sanofi/Regeneron; and receives research support from Allakos, Adare/Ellodi, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, and Regeneron/Sanofi. I. Hirano has received research funding from Adare Pharmaceuticals/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Allakos, AstraZeneca, Meritage Pharma, Inc, Receptos/Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Shire/Takeda; and is a consultant for Adare Pharmaceuticals/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Allakos, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aslan Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Calyx/Parexel, Celldex Therapeutics, Inc, Dermavant, EsoCap Biotech, Gossamer Bio, Eli Lilly, Nexstone, Meritage Pharma, Inc, Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Receptos/Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Shire/Takeda. M. Chehade has received consultant fees from Regeneron, Adare/Ellodi, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Recludix Pharma, Allakos, Shire/Takeda, and Phathom; and has received research support from Regeneron, Allakos, Shire/Takeda, AstraZeneca, Adare/Ellodi, and Danone. C. M. Davis has received grant funding from DBV Technologies, Aimmune Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Allergenis. E. S. Dellon is a consultant for Abbott, AbbVie, Adare/Ellodi, Aimmune, Akesobio, Alfasigma, ALK, Allakos, Amgen, Aqilion, Arena/Pfizer, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Avir, Biorasi, Calypso, Celgene/Receptos/Bristol Myers Squibb, Celldex, Eli Lilly, EsoCap, Eupraxia, Ferring, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Holoclara, Invea, Knightpoint, Landos, LucidDx, Morphic, Nexstone Immunology, Nutricia, Parexel/Calyx, Phathom, Regeneron, Revolo, Robarts/Alimentiv, Salix, Sanofi, Shire/Takeda, Target RWE, and Upstream Bio; has received research funding from Adare/Ellodi, Allakos, Arena/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Meritage, Miraca, Nutricia, Celgene/Receptos/Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, Revolo, and Shire/Takeda; and has received an educational grant from Allakos, Aqilion, Holoclara, and Invea. G. T. Furuta is Chief Medical Officer for EnteroTrack; and receives research funding from Arena/Pfizer. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The overview of the authors’ conflicts of interest are published in the guideline report (German version).

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a common cause of swallowing difficulties in both children and adults. The incidence of EoE has been increasing over the past decades, which cannot be solely attributed to improved diagnostic techniques. EoE is more common in adults than in children. The diagnosis is confirmed by a biopsy from the esophageal mucosa showing a significant infiltration of eosinophils. Many patients respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors, but those with severe EoE may require dietary modifications, topical steroids, and/or dilation of esophageal strictures. This review covers the incidence, risk factors, natural course, diagnosis, and treatment options for EoE, both within the Icelandic healthcare system andi n a broader context.

Background: Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus is a potentially fatal condition. Symptoms can vary and diagnosis can be challenging., Case Presentation: A woman in her seventies presented to the emergency department with sudden-onset epigastric pain after a meal. A computed tomography (CT) showed signs of oesophageal rupture. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an oesophageal rupture, and a stent was placed. The patient developed fever, dyspnoea and hypotension after the procedure. Additional CT revealed increasing pleural effusion, pneumomediastinum and loculaments of air in the peritoneum, and a mediastinal abscess. Laparoscopy with lavage and debridement was performed. A catheter was placed in the abscess and a chest tube in her right hemithorax. The stent was removed after 27 days. Further investigation revealed eosinophil oesophagitis as the likely cause of her oesophageal rupture., Interpretation: This case highlights the importance of early diagnosis and proper treatment of spontaneous oesophageal rupture. Treatment depends on the cause of the rupture and severity of the patient's condition.

This position paper deals with an expert consensus on diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction issued by the Austrian Eosinophilic Esophagitis Network, a working group under the patronage of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). In need of a standardized approach on the management of EoE, recommendations were made based on international guidelines and landmark studies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Food allergies are divided into 2 main categories: IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated food allergies. Both forms can have significant health effects but differ in mechanism, symptoms, and management. The manifestation of the 2 forms differs between children and adults. These differences can be observed in the prevalence and the type of most common allergens and clinical presentation. The prevalence of food allergies has increased worldwide in recent decades. IgE-mediated allergies are the best researched and documented. They are particularly common in children, while non-IgE-mediated allergies are less well understood and diagnosed, leading to uncertainty about their prevalence. They often manifest as gastrointestinal symptoms that can occur hours to days after ingestion and are often difficult to distinguish from other food intolerances. The occurrence of food allergies varies significantly geographically. Differences in dietary habits, food composition, and environmental factors can partly explain these differences. There are also indications that genetics may play a role. IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated food allergies represent a significant and growing challenge for the global healthcare system. This article provides an in-depth review of both types of food allergy, discussing their potential causes, diagnostic possibilities, and available therapeutic strategies. Some diseases represent a mixed form of IgE and non-IgE-mediated immunological adverse reactions. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is the most common eosinophilic disease, and the diagnosis and treatment options are explained in more detail below., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a commonly recognized cause of dysphagia. Conversely, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and celiac disease are rarer and often overlooked as dysphagia culprits. Overlap between these conditions complicates diagnosis and delays appropriate treatment. This review aims to clarify the distinctive dysphagia characteristics in each condition, explore potential overlaps, and offer guidance on differentiation., Recent Findings: Recent studies have advanced our understanding of dysphagia mechanisms in GERD, EoE, and celiac disease, particularly in characterizing disordered motility and dysphagia's natural history. While upper endoscopy, biopsies, and manometry remain crucial in dysphagia assessment, novel diagnostic tools are emerging. New insights highlight the significance of cytokine-induced mucosal injury in all three conditions, revealing potential connections where mucosal damage in one disorder may contribute to the development of others., Summary: GERD, EoE, and celiac disease can coexist and present with similar symptoms. Distinguishing between them often entails upper endoscopy, esophageal biopsies, pH testing, and celiac serologies. EoE should be considered when GERD patients fail proton pump inhibitor therapy or when celiac patients have persistent esophageal symptoms despite a gluten-free diet. Consider celiac disease if dysphagia accompanies iron deficiency anemia, malabsorptive diarrhea, or osteoporosis. Recognizing the potential overlap between these conditions is crucial for guiding clinical evaluation and therapy., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: This review aims to provide an overview of the current understanding of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) and the role of the epithelium in influencing disease pathogenesis to inform and devise future therapeutic strategies., Recent Findings: Changes in epithelial cell structure, functions, and integrity are observed in EGIDs. In eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), the esophageal epithelium has been shown to play key roles in perpetuating the inflammatory response in EoE through the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunological cell-surface proteins. Similar mechanisms appear to exist in the other EGIDs, including eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). Because of the increasing rarity of each non-EoE EGID, research focusing on how the epithelium is modulating disease in each lower gastrointestinal compartment is still in its rudimentary stages., Summary: While there has been significant progress in understanding the role of the epithelium in EoE, further research is needed to obtain a better understanding of the mechanisms mediating epithelial-immune crosstalk in non-EoE EGIDs. Using EoE-epithelial cell research to inform future EGID investigations could lead to the development of new therapeutic interventions, such as targeted therapies to restore epithelial barrier function and reduce inflammation, to improve rare disease-patient quality of life., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The connection between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and food and airborne allergens is complex. Exposure to allergens (mainly food) is often the trigger for EoE flares. The development of EoE has been described as a side effect of allergen immunotherapy, especially oral immunotherapy (OIT, with food allergens), while isolated cases of EoE have been reported during sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT, with extracts of aeroallergens)., Recent Findings: EoE is currently recognized as a common side effect of OIT, while a solid correlation between SLIT and EoE is missing. Animal models have been developed to study the pathophysiological link between sensitization to aeroallergens and the induction of EoE and will probably provide an interpretation of why there are cases of EoE developed during SLIT. Recent findings in animal models suggest a genetic connection to EoE development after sensitization and re-exposure to airborne allergens. Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy does not have a causative effect on EoE; on the contrary, a beneficial effect on EoE has been reported. Moreover, epicutaneous immunotherapy with a vector containing milk has also been used to treat children with milk-induced EoE., Summary: Discovering the immune links between allergens and EoE will further guide the proper use of allergen immunotherapy and help define future strategies for the management of EoE., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing Interests:: Samira Jeimy reports funding from the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario and honoraria for speaking engagements from GSK and L’Oréal. Dr. Jeimy has been a member of advisory boards for Sanofi Genzyme, GSK, and ALK, and has provided consultancy services for the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Dr. Jeimy has leadership roles with the Ontario Medical Association and the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI). Edmond Chan has received research support from DBV Technologies; has been a member of advisory boards for Pfizer, Miravo, Medexus, LEO Pharma, Kaleo, DBV, AllerGenis, Sanofi Genzyme, Bausch Health, Avir Pharma, AstraZeneca, ALK, and Alladapt; and was colead of the CSACI oral immunotherapy guidelines. Dr. Chan is an executive of the CSACI, executive of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and member of the Healthcare Advisory Board for Food Allergy Canada. Victoria Cook reports funding from Provincial Health Services Authority and ALK, has received honoraria from Aralez Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer, and has a leadership role with CSACI.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with EoE predominantly provoked by food and aeroallergens, whereas IBD is driven by a broader spectrum of immunopathological and environmental triggers. This review presents a comprehensive comparison of the pathophysiological and therapeutic strategies for EoE and IBD. We examine the current understanding of their underlying mechanisms, particularly the interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. A crucial element in both diseases is the integrity of the epithelial barrier, whose disruption plays a central role in their pathogenesis. The involvement of eosinophils, mast cells, B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and their associated cytokines is examined, highlighting the importance of targeting cytokine signaling pathways to modulate immune-epithelial interactions. We propose that advances in computation tools will uncover the significance of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in connecting immune and epithelial cells, leading to novel therapies for EoE and IBD.

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus. This real-world study used patient and physician surveys to describe the clinical characteristics and disease burden of eosinophilic esophagitis-overall and in a subgroup of patients with dysphagia despite treatment., Methods: Data analyzed in this study were collected in 2020 from US and EU patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 12 years with a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis, had an esophageal count of ≥ 15 eosinophils/high-power field at diagnosis, and were currently prescribed treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis., Results: Overall, 1001 patients were included, of whom 356 (36%) had dysphagia despite treatment. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in both populations. The severity of eosinophilic esophagitis was mild in more patients overall (69%) versus those with dysphagia despite treatment (48%). Patient disease history was similar in both populations, with some exceptions: common patient-reported symptoms were dysphagia (70% and 86%) and heartburn/acid reflux (55% and 49%), and common physician-reported symptoms were dysphagia (75% and 91%) and food impaction (46% and 52%). Treatment history was similar in both populations; overall, the most common treatments were proton pump inhibitors (83%) and topical corticosteroids (51%). Patients reported slightly more days with symptoms, higher impacts on activities of daily living, and slightly higher anxiety or depression in the dysphagia-despite-treatment population versus the overall population., Conclusions: Eosinophilic esophagitis presents severe symptoms and comorbidities that substantially impact patients' well-being and quality of life. Greater awareness of and novel treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis are needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the squamous epithelium. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published a guideline in 2014; however, the rapid evolution of knowledge about pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic options have made an update necessary., Methods: A consensus group of pediatric gastroenterologists from the ESPGHAN Working Group on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases (ESPGHAN EGID WG) reviewed the recent literature and proposed statements and recommendations on 28 relevant questions about EoE. A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2014 to 2022. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations., Results: A total of 52 statements based on the available evidence and 44 consensus-based recommendations are available. A revision of the diagnostic protocol, options for initial drug treatment, and the new concept of simplified empiric elimination diets are now available. Biologics are becoming a part of the potential armamentarium for refractory EoE, and systemic steroids may be considered as the initial treatment for esophageal strictures before esophageal dilation. The importance and assessment of quality of life and a planned transition to adult medical care are new areas addressed in this guideline., Conclusion: Research in recent years has led to a better understanding of childhood EoE. This guideline incorporates the new findings and provides a practical guide for clinicians treating children diagnosed with EoE., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Guideline Title: Joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN Guidelines on Childhood Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders Beyond Eosinophilic Esophagitis RELEASE DATE: July 4, 2023 (e-publication ahead of print) PRIOR VERSION(S): None DEVELOPER: European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the North American Society for Pediatrics Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) FUNDING SOURCE: ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN TARGET POPULATION: Children with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders beyond eosinophilic esophagitis., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Hospital Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Hospital Medicine.)

Cow's milk elimination (CME) is an established treatment, similar to other forms of diet therapy, for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, there is limited research to support its efficacy as a primary treatment. This review evaluated studies published in the past 10 years that assessed the outcomes after CME on histologic remission, clinical findings, and quality of life (QoL) in children aged 2-18 years with EoE. The evidence demonstrated that CME was effective at achieving histologic remission of disease in 50%-65% of children. This intervention also improved clinical symptoms seen on endoscopy and resulted in increased QoL when self-reported by children. CME can be used as a primary treatment for some children with EoE., (© 2024 The Authors. Nutrition in Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are the most common inflammatory causes of pediatric dysphagia, but several other less prevalent conditions should be considered. These conditions can affect one or several aspects of the swallowing process. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia may be an early symptom. Esophagoscopy and instrumental swallow studies are often needed to determine the underlying diagnosis and best treatment plan. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia can portend a worse outcome and need for more aggressive treatment of the underlying condition. Consultations with speech language pathology, gastroenterology, dietetics, allergy/immunology and/or rheumatology are often needed to optimize management., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: : Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments., Methods: : We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined., Results: : No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up., Conclusions: : Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

Background: Several dietary approaches have been used to induce remission in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), yielding varied results., Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up to May 2024 to identify studies including dietary interventions for EoE used as monotherapy. Summary estimates with 95% CIs for achieving <15 eosinophils/HPF were calculated for each approach. Fixed or random effects models were used depending on heterogeneity (I 2 ); publication bias risks were assessed using funnel plot analyses. Subgroup analyses results were compared using meta-regression., Results: Forty-three studies with 2825 patients were included in quantitative summaries. The overall rate of histologic remission was 60.6% (95% CI, 54.6-66.5%). Effectiveness rates were 94.5% (95% CI, 92.3-96.4%) for elemental diets, 63.9% (95% CI, 58.5-69.2%) for six-food elimination diets, 54.7% (95% CI, 45.7-63.6%) for four-food elimination diets, 44.3% (95% CI, 36.1-52.8%) for two-food elimination diets, 46.4% (95% CI, 40-52.9%) for one-food elimination diets, and 39.5% (95% CI, 30.3-49.2%) for allergy testing-directed food elimination diets. Overall, superior efficacy was noted in children than in adults and in retrospective compared to prospective studies., Conclusion: Diet therapy remains an effective therapeutic asset for pediatric and adult patients with EoE, with increasing efficacy noted as the levels of dietary restriction increase.

The present document constitutes Part 2 of the EoETALY Consensus Statements guideline on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) developed by experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group). Part 1 was published as a different document, and included three chapters discussing 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history and 3) diagnosis of EoE. The present work provides guidelines on the management of EoE in two final chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up, and also includes considerations on knowledge gaps and a proposed research agenda for the coming years. The guideline was developed through a Delphi process, with grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations performed according to accepted GRADE criteria.This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). The guidelines also involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

This chapter presents an overview of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) for the Primary Care Practitioner (PCP). The focus is on helping PCPs keep it in their differential diagnosis by discussing the spectrum of clinical presentations, how to screen for EoE in at-risk populations and subsequently manage the patient with this condition. The authors review epidemiology, risk factors and associated conditions, pathology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management options., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.)

Although mostly accentuated in the distal esophagus, distribution of esophageal eosinophilia in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) seems to be nonuniform. 1 Disease extent has been associated with disease severity and disease progression in inflammatory bowel disease. 2,3 Whether the same holds true for EoE remains largely unknown. One recent EoE study looked at the distribution of eosinophilia, but without analyzing its potential association with treatment outcomes. 4 Here, we characterize the different inflammatory patterns of EoE and investigate their impact on disease presentation and disease outcome, with a particular focus on therapeutic response., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to assess the clinical practices and adherence to guidelines for adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) patients in Europe., Methods: A cross-sectional web survey containing 23 questions was distributed to members of the European Consortium for Eosinophilic Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract (EUREOS) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and digestive endoscopists (AIGO). We conducted a subgroup analysis to assess the impact of EoE expertise and practice setting on clinical practices., Results: 228 physicians from 18 European countries participated. Adherence to guidelines varied from 72% to 98.6%. 83.4% of total respondents obtained ≥ 6 esophageal biopsies in suspected EoE. 42% of total respondents, 82.5% of EoE experts (vs. non-experts 33%; P < 0.0001), and 55% of academics (vs. 29.1 non-academics; P < 0.0001) routinely used the EREFS score. Regarding first-line therapy, 82.9% of total respondents prescribed proton pump inhibitors, 41.6% topical steroids, 20.6% elimination diets, and 9.2% combination therapies. Only 72% of respondents used symptoms and endoscopy with <15 Eosinophils/HPF to define treatment response. 21.5% of all respondents did not prescribe maintenance therapies and 12.7% discontinued therapy before response evaluation endoscopy., Conclusion: Our findings revealed significant heterogeneity in practice patterns and suboptimal adherence to EoE guidelines across Europe. Expertise in EoE and working in an academic hospital positively influenced clinical practices and adherence to guidelines., (Copyright © 2023 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a Th2 immune/antigen-mediated disorder characterized by esophageal dysfunction and eosinophilic inflammation. Worsening dysphagia and food impactions are significant complications associated with esophageal remodeling and fibrostenotic disease. This review highlights the most recent research findings pertaining to mechanisms of sub-epithelial fibrosis in EoE, current diagnostic tools, and therapeutic approaches., Recent Findings: Recent studies leveraging publicly available single cell sequencing databases and comparative proteomics have furthered our understanding of the mechanisms mediating fibrosis. Fibroblast crosstalk with the extracellular matrix and with epithelial, endothelial, and T cells have been implicated, with the likely existence of multiple fibroblast sub-types. Accurate diagnosis of remodeling with biopsies remains a challenge due to inadequate depth of sampling. Web-based tools incorporating epithelial findings show promise in predicting subepithelial fibrosis. Impedance planimetry with esophageal distensibility measurements are increasingly utilized tools to assess fibrostenotic severity. Immunostaining and luminal captured proteins associated with remodeling show promise as potential molecular markers of fibrosis. Anti-inflammatory therapy may improve esophageal fibrosis and distensibility, although specific fibrosis-targeted therapy is lacking., Summary: Recent studies highlight novel mechanisms of fibrosis in EoE. Improved understanding of these mechanisms may lead to novel diagnostic strategies and therapies, and thereby inform treatment decisions., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Evaluating clinical care through quality-related metrics is increasingly common. There are now numerous quality statements and indicators related to the medical management of benign and pre-malignant esophageal diseases. Expert consensus leveraging evidence-based recommendations from published society guidelines has been the most frequently used basis for developing esophageal quality statements. While surgical care of patients with esophageal malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, has also been developed, those related to benign esophageal disease now include domains of diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), achalasia, and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several recent studies evaluating adherence to quality metrics affirm substantial variation in practice patterns with opportunities for improvement in care across esophageal diseases. In particular, patient education regarding treatment options in achalasia, frequency of esophageal biopsies among patients with dysphagia to evaluate for EoE, and endoscopic evaluation within a BE segment are areas identified to have need for improvement. As the management of esophageal diseases becomes more complex and interdisciplinary, adherence to quality metrics may be a source of standardization and improvement in delivery and ultimately patient outcomes. Indeed, the development of national quality databases has resulted in a significant growth in the use of these metrics for quality improvement activities and may form the basis for future inclusion in quality reporting and payment programs., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is often diagnosed in school-age children between 6- and 9-year-old. There is less known about those who are diagnosed with EoE that are younger than 6 years old. The objective of this study is to compare clinical presentation, comorbidities, and outcomes based on age at diagnosis of EoE., Methods: Single-center retrospective chart review of children (<18 years) diagnosed with EoE between 2005 and 2020. We recorded demographics, clinical presentation, family history, past medical history, treatment, and endoscopic findings. Children in this cohort were classified based on age into three age groups: <2 years, 2-<6 years, and 6-<18 years., Results: We identified 256 children with EoE, the mean age (SD) at the time of diagnosis was 9 (5.2) years and 184 (72%) were male. We had 164 (64%) patients with available follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) data (495 EGDs in total) of those 99/164 (60%) reached mucosal remission. In the very young children (<2 years) vomiting was the most common presentation, while poor weight gain was seen more in the 2-<6-year group in comparison to the >6-years. Food impaction and abdominal pain were most likely to present in older children 6-18 years. Combination therapy, as opposed to a single therapy, induced remission at a higher frequency in the <6-year group in comparison to the 6-<18-year group (85% vs. 66%)., Conclusion: EoE should be considered in younger children presenting with feeding difficulty and poor weight gain. Combination therapy seems to be more effective in younger children with EoE, but further studies with bigger sample size are needed to study the efficacy of the different combination therapies., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus that represents the most common eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease. Experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group) including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, allergologists/immunologists, and paediatricians conducted a Delphi process to develop updated consensus statements for the management of patients with EoE and update the previous position paper of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) in light of recent evidence. Grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations was performed using accepted GRADE criteria. The guideline is divided in two documents: Part 1 includes three chapters, namely 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history, and 3) diagnosis, while Part 2 includes two chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up. This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the SIGE, the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). With regards to patients' involvement, these guidelines involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Nicola de Bortoli: Advisory board member for: AlfaSigma, Sanofi Genzyme, Dr Falk; Lecture grants from Reckitt-Benkiser, Malesci, Dr. Flak, Sofar, Alfa-Sigma, Pharma-Line. Pierfrancesco Visaggi: Has served as speaker for Dr Falk, JB Pharmaceuticals, Malesci. Roberto Penagini: Has served as speaker for Dr Falk, Sanofi. Edda Battaglia: has served as consultant for NZP, GUNA Gaia Pellegatta has served as speaker for Dr Falk, Sanofi Genzyme, Malesci. Paola Iovino: Has served as consultant for Dr Falk Giovanni Marasco: Served as an advisory board member for AlfaSigma, EG Pharma, Monteresearch srl, Recordati, Cineca. Received lecture grants from Agave, AlfaSigma, Bromatech, Clorofilla, Echosens, Ferring, Mayoly Spindler, Menarini and Schwabe Pharma. Salvatore Oliva: Has served as speaker for Sanofi, Medtronic; Has served as consultant for: Sanofi, Medtronic, Brystol; Has received research support from Alfa Sigma, Medtronic. Francesca Racca: has served as speaker for Sanofi; has served as consultant for Dr Falk, Sanofi, GSK Erminia Ridolo: has served as consultant for Dr Falk Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino: has served as speaker for Abbvie, Agave, AGPharma, Alfasigma, Aurora Pharma, CaDiGroup, Celltrion, Dr Falk, EG Stada Group, Fenix Pharma, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, JB Pharmaceuticals, Innovamedica/Adacyte, Malesci, Mayoly Biohealth, Omega Pharma, Pfizer, Reckitt Benckiser, Sandoz, SILA, Sofar, Takeda, Tillots, Unifarco; has served as consultant for Abbvie, Agave, Alfasigma, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Diadema Farmaceutici, Dr. Falk, Fenix Pharma, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, JB Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Nestlè, Reckitt Benckiser, Regeneron, Sanofi, SILA, Sofar, Synformulas GmbH, Tssakeda, Unifarco; he received research support from Pfizer, Reckitt Benckiser, SILA, Sofar, Unifarco, Zeta Farmaceutici. Bruno Annibale, Federica Baiano Svizzero, Giovanni Barbara, Brigida Barberio, Ottavia Bartolo, Antonio Di Sabatino, Ludovico Docimo, Marzio Frazzoni, Manuele Furnari, Matteo Ghisa, Andrea Iori, Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Elisa Marabotto, Aurelio Mauro, Marcella Pesce, Antonino Carlo Privitera, Ilaria Puxeddu, Mentore Ribolsi, Salvatore Russo, Giovanni Sarnelli, Salvatore Tolone, Patrizia Zentilin, Fabiana Zingone: None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic and commonly evolving condition leading to relevant and potentially irreversible burden in terms of tissue damage and related functional impairment, thus significantly impacting on quality of life. The aim of the present review is to summarize the recent advances in terms of diagnostic work-up and pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of the disease, under the broader perspective of type 2 inflammation., Recent Findings: Two major novelties have prompted an innovative approach to EoE. In terms of diagnosis, it has been proposed to dissect the disease heterogeneity in three endotypes, independent from tissue eosinophil number: EoEe1, characterized by normal appearing oesophagus; EoEe2, associated with type 2 inflammation and steroid-refractoriness; EoEe3, whose features include adult onset, a more fibro-stenotic aspect and loss of epithelial gene expression. Concerning treatment, two recently licensed drugs for EoE, oro-dispersible budesonide and dupilumab represent the first treatment options specifically developed for EoE and addressing EoE-related peculiar pathobiological features., Summary: In the era of precision medicine, managing EoE according to a phenotype-driven approach might be helpful in defining the best treatment options in the different disease forms or stages. In addition, exploring the coexistence or the previous occurrence of other type 2 conditions may suggest the opportunity to specifically target type 2 inflammation through biologic therapy. The complex EoE pathobiology combining inflammatory and functional features, both at organ and systemic level, requires a multidimensional approach relying on the strict integration of gastroenterologists and allergist-immunologists., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current treatments of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) aim to eliminate esophageal mucosal inflammation and attenuate, stabilize, or reverse stricture formation. However, our ability to study the long-term course of esophageal strictures in patients with EoE is hampered by the short-term existence of this disease. It is unclear to what degree of control of inflammation is needed to prevent stricture formation. Additionally, identified phenotypes of EoE may ultimately dictate different levels of concern and time intervals for developing fibrosis. Currently, multiple methods are used to monitor patients' disease progression to fibrosis, as symptoms alone do not correlate with disease activity. Endoscopic findings and mucosal histology are used to monitor disease activity, but these focus on improvements in inflammation with inconsistent evaluation of underlying fibrosis. The use of functional lumen impedance planimetry, barium esophagraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound continues to expand in EoE. The rapid advancements in EoE have led to an armamentarium of measuring tools and therapies that holistically characterize disease severity and response to therapy. Nevertheless, our ability to evaluate gross esophageal fibrosis and stricture formation from a transmural rather than mucosal view should be a focus of future investigations because it is essential to monitoring and modulating the trajectory of EoE., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: D. A. Katzka reports performing research consulting work for Medtronic. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated food allergy-driven disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus leading to symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Prior studies have supported the key role of food allergen exposure as the main driver behind the etiopathogenesis showing that removal of food antigens can result in disease remission in both children and adults. These landmark studies serve as the basis for the rising interest and evolution of dietary therapy in EoE. This article will focus on the rationale for dietary therapy in EoE and provide helpful tools for the implementation of dietary therapy in practice., Competing Interests: Disclosure N. Gonsalves: Consultant for AstraZeneca, Allakos, BMS, Sanofi-Regeneron; Speaking: Sanofi-Regeneron. M. Groetch: Received royalties from UpToDate and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and consulting fees from FARE; Serves on the Medical Advisory Board of the International Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Association as a Senior Advisor to FARE, as a Health Sciences Advisor for APFED, and is on the editorial board of the Journal of Food Allergy; and has no commercial interests to disclose. A. Lucendo: Consultant for Dr Falk Pharma and EsoCap., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and strictures (EREFS) represent the major endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The Endoscopic Reference System (EREFS) grading system is easy to learn and apply during daily clinical practice in the diagnosis and follow-up of EoE patients. When endoscopy is performed by an EoE-experienced physician, the EREFS criteria will identify the majority of EoE patients. The EREFS score from the area of greatest involvement of the esophagus should be reported. The EREFS grading system was formally validated as an endoscopy score and several randomized placebo-controlled trials have shown responsiveness of the EREFS score to therapeutic interventions., Competing Interests: Disclosure A.M. Schoepfer received consulting fees and/or speaker fees and/or research grants from Avir Pharma, Inc., Adare/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, AG, Switzerland, Receptos-Celgene-BMS Corp., Dr Falk Pharma, GmbH, Germany, Glaxo Smith Kline, AG, Nestlé S. A., Switzerland, Novartis, AG, Switzerland, and Regeneron-Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E. Safroneeva reports (i) consulting fees from Avir Pharma, Inc., Aptalis Pharma, Inc., Celgene Corp., Novartis, AG, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc; (ii) being an employee of Tillotts Pharma AG. K. Peterson received (i) consulting fees and/or speaker fees from AGA, Alladapt, AstraZeneca, Allakos, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Ellodi, ITA group, Lecture LInx, Lucid, Nexstone (Ubiquity), WebMD, Peerview, PLatform Q health, Regeneron, Revolo, Sanofi, Takeda, WebMD; (ii) research support from AstraZeneca, Allakos, Regeneron-Sanofi, Revolo, Adare, Ellodi, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celldex; and (iii) equity from Nexeos Bio., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGID), such as eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis, and eosinophilic colitis (EoC), are chronic inflammatory conditions characterized by persistent gastrointestinal symptoms and elevated levels of activated eosinophils in the gastrointestinal tract. EoG and eosinophilic duodenitis (EoD) are strongly associated with food allergen triggers and T H 2 inflammation, whereas EoC shows minimal transcriptomic overlap with other EGIDs. The level of expression of certain genes associated with T H 2 immune response is associated with certain histopathologic findings of EoG, EoD, and EoC. Current immune therapy for EoG depletes tissue eosinophilia with persistence of other histopathologic features of disease., Competing Interests: Disclosures M. Pletneva is a consultant for Allakos. M.H. Collins is a consultant for Allakos, Arena/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Calypso Biotech, EsoCap Biotech, GlaxoSmithKline, Receptos/Celgene/BMS, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Robarts Clinical Trials Inc./Alimentiv, Inc. and Shire, a Takeda company. N.C. Arva, A. Bernieh, O. Lopez-Nunez, and G-Y. Yang do not have conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mast cells play a central role in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs), including eosinophilic esophagitis. Their interactions with immune and structural cells, involvement in tissue remodeling, and contribution to symptoms make them attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. More is being discovered regarding the intricate interplay of mast cells and eosinophils. Recent studies demonstrating that depletion of eosinophils is insufficient to improve symptoms of EGIDs have raised the question of whether other cells may play a role in symptomatology and pathogenesis of EGIDs., Competing Interests: Disclosure J.B. Wechsler provides medical advisory consulting for Regeneron/Sanofi, Allakos, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ellodi. J.B. Wechsler is a speaker for Regeneron/Sanofi. J.B. Wechsler received clinical trial funding from Regeneron, United States and Allakos. P. Khoury has nothing to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The clinical presentation of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases beyond eosinophilic esophagitis (non-EoE EGIDs) varies depending on the gastrointestinal segments affected by the eosinophilic inflammation, the extent of eosinophilic inflammation within the gastrointestinal tract and its depth through the bowel wall. Non-EoE EGIDs with mucosal involvement tend to present with diarrhea, malabsorption, and sometimes bleeding, those with muscular involvement may present with symptoms of obstruction or pseudo-obstruction, intussusception, and even perforation, whereas those with serosal involvement may present with eosinophilic ascites. Here we describe the differences in symptoms experienced by children with non-EoE EGIDs with varying degrees of eosinophilic inflammation through the bowel wall., Competing Interests: Disclosure None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Microscopic examination of esophageal biopsies is essential to diagnose eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Eosinophil inflammation is the basis for the diagnosis, but additional abnormalities may contribute to persistent symptoms and epithelial barrier dysfunction. Both peak eosinophil count and assessments of additional features should be included in pre-therapy and post-therapy pathology reports. Pathologic abnormalities identified in esophageal biopsies of EoE are reversible in contrast to esophageal strictures., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.H. Collins is a consultant for Allakos, Arena/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Calypso Biotech, EsoCap Biotech, GlaxoSmithKline, Receptos/Celgene/BMS, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Robarts Clinical Trials Inc./Alimentiv, Inc. and Shire, a Takeda company. M. Pletneva is a consultant for Allakos. N.C. Arva, A. Bernieh, O. Lopez-Nunez and G.-Y. Yang do not have conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapy is a treatment approach based on the principle of incremental allergen exposure to achieve desensitization. Recently, oral immunotherapy has been introduced as a treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy. Some patients receiving oral immunotherapy for food allergy may develop eosinophilic esophagitis. Here, we summarize the literature examining this association, its treatment, and outcomes and discuss possible explanations for this clinical phenomenon. We further identify potential associations with aeroallergen sensitivity and other forms of immunotherapy including subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy. Finally, we discuss management of immunotherapy-induced eosinophilic esophagitis. Epicutaneous immunotherapy is highlighted as an area of therapeutic investigation., Competing Interests: Disclosure B.L. Wright has received in-kind support from Regeneron in the form of study drug for an ongoing clinical trial investigating the role of dupilumab as an adjunct to milk oral immunotherapy. J. Spergel has consulting agreements with Regeneron, Sanofi, Novartis, and Alladapt, and he has royalties with UpToDate. J. Spergel and N. Wolfset have received in-kind support from Regeneron, United States in the form of study drug for an ongoing clinical trial investigating the role of dupilumab in eosinophilic esophagitis. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) gained relevance in research and clinical practice in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. The physical discomfort and social and psychological consequences of this food-related disease substantially affect HRQOL. Determinant of an impaired HRQOL include symptom severity, disease duration, biological disease activity, and psychological factors. Patients prioritize symptom relief and improved HRQOL as treatment objectives. Available treatment options can address these goals; however, there is a suboptimal adherence to treatment. There is a need for enhanced patient guidance and education. The assessment of HRQOL will help to prioritize patient's needs in management., Competing Interests: Disclosure No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or to prepare this article. M.L. van Klink has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article, A.J. Bredenoord has received research funding from Nutricia, United States, Norgine, Netherlands, Thelial, Sanofi, United States/Regeneron, SST, and Dr Falk Pharma and received speaker and/or consulting fees from Laborie, Medtronic, Dr Falk Pharma, Calypso Biotech, Eupraxia, Aqilion, Alimentiv, Sanofi/Regeneron, Reckitt and AstraZeneca. A.J. Bredenoord is supported by Vidi grant 91718300 from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is based on clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil predominant esophageal inflammation. Clinical symptoms in children with EoE vary based on age and may be nonspecific. EoE has a male predominance with the majority having comorbid atopic disorders. At present, treatment options include medications (proton pump inhibition, swallowed topical steroids), dietary therapy or biologic therapy (dupilumab, approved for those ≥12 years of age). Outside of EoE in the context of oral immunotherapy, EoE is typically chronic requiring lifelong therapy. Long-term complications including feeding difficulties, malnutrition, and fibrostenotic disease., Competing Interests: Disclosure M. Bauer, has served as a consult for Sanofi. N. Nguyen, has served as a consultant for Regeneron/Sanofi and is on the advisory board for EvoEndo. C.A. Liacouras, has served a speaker and consultant for Abbott; a speaker for Regeneron and a speaker for Sanofi., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (EGID) is an umbrella term encompassing a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterized by eosinophil-rich inflammation affecting one or more segments of the gastrointestinal tract. A recent consensus in nomenclature and emerging data made possible through multi-center consortia are beginning to unravel the molecular and cellular underpinnings of EGIDs below the esophagus. These emerging findings are revealing both overarching commonalities related to a food allergen-driven, chronic, Th2-mediated immune response as well as location-specific nuances in the pathophysiology of the collective EGIDs. Altogether, these advances offer promise for improved diagnoses and more efficacious interventional strategies., Competing Interests: Disclosure None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are becoming more common causing significant suffering and reduced quality of life. These conditions can affect different parts of the digestive system, either individually or in combination. Recognition of their link to allergic disorders or other gastrointestinal (GI) diseases has raised questions about their shared underlying mechanisms, which has had implications for diagnosis and management. The authors critically examine the current understanding of the connection between EGIDs and allergic conditions (ie, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergy) and GI diseases (ie, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and motility disorders)., Competing Interests: Disclosure S. Oliva serves as a consultant and speaker and has received grants from Medtronic, Regeneron/Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb. E.C. McGowan has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, the American College of Gastroenterology and Regeneron/Sanofi (all funds to the University of Virginia) and has served as a consultant to Regeneron/Sanofi. No honorarium, grant, or other form of payment was given to anyone to write or produce the article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Feeding is a complex skill requiring coordination of multiple body systems. Multiple factors are considered in feeding dysfunction in pediatric patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, including overall development, nutritional status, mealtime behaviors, and medical comorbidities. Symptoms of feeding dysfunction vary by age, with maladaptive learned feeding behaviors spanning all age ranges. Knowledge of the normal acquisition of feeding skills is critical to interpret the impact of the disease and plan appropriate intervention. Assessment and treatment from a feeding and swallowing disorders specialist can dramatically impact successful outcomes in nutrition, growth, mealtime dynamics and ultimatly quality of life for children and their caregivers in home and social settings., Competing Interests: Disclosure None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)