Search

Rituximab is extensively used for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. However, the best dosage remains to be established. It has been proposed that retreatment could be guided by B lymphocyte (BL) percentages.To establish the best BL value for retreatment with rituximab in MS and to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.A prospective study was done with an exploratory cohort and a confirmatory cohort of MS patients treated with rituximab between 2017 and 2021. The first one comprised 10 MS patients with BL assessed every 3 months after rituximab infusion and retreatment done when BL values were ≥0.5%. The confirmatory cohort included 41 MS patients (41.5% women, 87.8% with secondary progressive MS, median age = 46.3 (interquartile range: 41.3-52.1) years, disease duration = 14.1 (9-19.6) years, EDSS score = 5.5 (4.0-6.5)). The confirmatory cohort was treated with rituximab following the pattern established in the exploratory cohort.In the exploratory cohort, ≥0.2% BL was established as the best value for retreatment because in most cases, a substantial increase of BL counts was preceded by initial values of 0.2-0.3%. In the confirmatory cohort, rituximab reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR 0.56 vs. 0.125, p 0.001), proportion of patients with appearance of new/enlarged T2 lesions (63.4% vs. 12.2%, p 0.001), gadolinium-enhancing lesions (39% vs. 0%, p 0.001), and confirmed disability progression (55% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.037). There were 22 patients (53.7%) who achieved NEDA-3. No patients had severe infections, and 10.7% cases had reduced IgG levels.Rituximab treatment guided by BL showed high effectiveness and a good safety profile for MS patients after one year of treatment.

Serum neurofilament light chains (sNfL) are biomarkers of disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), but their value to predict response to treatment, and their association with patient immunological profile, need to be further explored. We studied 80 relapsing–remitting MS patients initiating dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment. sNfL levels were explored at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months by single molecule array. Blood lymphocyte subsets were measured at baseline and at 6 months by flow cytometry. Patients were followed a year and classified as NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) or ODA (ongoing disease activity). NEDA patients had lower sNfL levels at baseline (p = 0.0001), and after three (p = 0.004) and six (p = 0.03) months of DMF treatment. Consequently, low baseline sNfL values (≤ 12 pg/ml) increased the probability of NEDA (OR 5.8; CI 1.82–15.6; p = 0.002, after correcting by disease activity in the previous year), and associated with significant reductions of central memory CD4+ T lymphocytes, interferon-gamma+ CD8+ T lymphocytes, Natural Killer T cells, and memory B cells upon DMF treatment, being the highest differences in memory B cells (p

ImportanceThe value of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels for predicting long-term disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) remains controversial.ObjectiveTo assess whether high sNfL values are associated with disability worsening in patients who underwent their first demyelinating MS event.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent their first demyelinating event suggestive of MS at Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (development cohort; June 1, 1994, to September 31, 2021, with follow-up until August 31, 2022) and 8 Spanish hospitals (validation cohort; October 1, 1995, to August 4, 2020, with follow-up until August 16, 2022).ExposuresClinical evaluations at least every 6 months.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were 6-month confirmed disability worsening (CDW) and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3. Levels of sNfL were measured in blood samples obtained within 12 months after disease onset using a single molecule array kit. The cutoffs used were sNfL level of 10 pg/mL and a standardized score (z score) of 1.5. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate outcomes.ResultsOf the 578 patients included in the study, 327 were in the development cohort (median age at sNfL analysis, 34.1 years [IQR, 27.2-42.7 years]; 226 female [69.1%]) and 251 patients were in the validation cohort (median age at sNfL analysis, 33.3 years [IQR, 27.4-41.5 years]; 184 female [73.3%]). The median follow-up was 7.10 years (IQR, 4.18-10.0 years). Levels of sNfL greater than 10 pg/mL were independently associated with higher risk of 6-month CDW and an EDSS of 3 in the development cohort (6-month CDW: hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; 95% CI, 1.39-4.12; P = .002; EDSS of 3: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 2.18-7.77; P P = .02; EDSS of 3: HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.23-3.33; P = .005). Highly effective disease-modifying treatments were associated with lower risks of 6-month CDW and an EDSS of 3 in patients with high baseline sNfL values.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that high sNfL values obtained within the first year of disease were associated with long-term disability worsening in MS, suggesting that sNfL level measurement may help identify optimal candidates for highly effective disease-modifying treatments.

Background: Lymphopenia is a major concern in MS patients treated with dimethyl-fumarate (DMF) as it increases the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. A pronounced reduction in absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) early after treatment initiation has been suggested to be associated with the occurrence of lymphopenia thereafter. Objectives: To identify risk factors for DMF-induced lymphopenia and evaluate whether the degree of decrease in the ALCs three months after initiation of DMF treatment is a predictor of the subsequent development of lymphopenia. Methods: In this real-world Spanish prospective multicenter study conducted in MS patients who started DMF between 2014 and 2019, we analyzed the association between DMF-related lymphopenia and the percentage of early ALCs decline using regression models, considering both, significant lymphopenia (grades 2 + 3) and severe lymphopenia (grade 3). The cutoff values of early ALCs declines were obtained using the ROC curve. Results: Among 532 MS patients treated with DMF, 193 (36.3%) developed any grade of lymphopenia. Older age and lower ALCs at treatment onset predicted the risk for lymphopenia but the best predictive risk factor was the reduction of ALCs within the three first months of treatment. Specifically, a reduction in ALCs≥21.2% was associated with a 6.5-fold higher risk of developing significant lymphopenia, and a decrease in ALCs≥40.2% with a 12.7-fold higher risk of developing severe lymphopenia. Conclusions: A pronounced reduction in ALCs early after initiation of DMF in MS patients is the best predictive risk factor for the subsequent development of significant lymphopenia. Sin financiación 4.808 JCR (2021) Q2, 64/212 Clinical Neurology 1.006 JCR (2021) Q1, 472/2489 Medicine (miscellaneous) No data IDR 2020 UEM

Background and purpose Limited information is available on incidence and outcomes of COVID‐19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study investigated the risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19‐related outcomes in patients with MS, and compared these with the general population. Methods A regional registry was created to collect data on incidence, hospitalization rates, intensive care unit admission, and death in patients with MS and COVID‐19. National government outcomes and seroprevalence data were used for comparison. The study was conducted at 14 specialist MS treatment centers in Madrid, Spain, between February and May 2020. Results Two‐hundred nineteen patients were included in the registry, 51 of whom were hospitalized with COVID‐19. The mean age ± standard deviation was 45.3 ± 12.4 years, and the mean duration of MS was 11.9 ± 8.9 years. The infection incidence rate was lower in patients with MS than the general population (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.80), but hospitalization rates were higher (relative risk = 5.03, 95% CI = 3.76–6.62). Disease severity was generally low, with only one admission to an intensive care unit and five deaths. Males with MS had higher incidence rates and risk of hospitalization than females. No association was found between the use of any disease‐modifying treatment and hospitalization risk. Conclusions Patients with MS do not appear to have greater risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or severe COVID‐19 outcomes compared with the general population. The decision to start or continue disease‐modifying treatment should be based on a careful risk–benefit assessment., In this multicenter registry‐based cohort study, patients with multiple sclerosis did not have an increased risk of becoming infected with COVID‐19 compared with the general population, and were not more likely to have a severe outcome of COVID‐19 (i.e., admission to an intensive care unit or death). No relationship was found between the use of any disease‐modifying treatment and the development of severe COVID‐19 disease.

Background Lymphopenia is a major concern in MS patients treated with dimethyl-fumarate (DMF) as it increases the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Objective To identify factors associated with lymphopenia in DMF-treated patients and explore changes in blood lymphocyte subsets associated with DMF-induced lymphopenia. Methods Prospective longitudinal study including 106 patients initiating DMF treatment followed for a median time of 24.67 months. Blood lymphocyte subsets were studied in 64 patients by flow cytometry at baseline and 6 months after. Results Mean absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) decreased by 29% during the first year of DMF-treatment. Patients developing lymphopenia showed a faster decline within the three first months. A reduction of ALCs higher than 38% at this time was associated to subsequent development of grade 2–3 lymphopenia (OR = 5.93, 95% CI: 1.9–18.6, p = 0.002). All patients showed a significant decrease in different T and B lymphocyte subsets upon DMF therapy. In addition, lymphopenic patients experienced a selective decrease in natural killer T (NKT) cell percentages (p = 0.01), and a high drop in NKT total counts (p Conclusions Patients who experience a drop in ALCs by >38% at three months of DMF-treatment are about 6-times more likely to develop significant lymphopenia. This decrease is clearly associated with a considerable loss of NKT cells.

Objectives Teriflunomide, a disease‐modifying treatment approved for multiple sclerosis (MS), inhibits reversibly dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, an enzyme involved in de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis and down‐regulates proliferation of activated lymphocytes. We aimed to study the impact of this drug in the lymphocyte profiles of MS patients. Methods Fifty‐five patients with relapsing‐remitting MS who initiated teriflunomide treatment were included in the study. We studied peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained before and 6 months after treatment initiation and explored effector, memory, and regulatory cells by flow cytometry. Wilcoxon matched pair tests were used to assess differences between basal and 6 months after treatment results. P‐values were corrected with Bonferroni test. Results When explored T and B cell subsets, we observed a decrease in the percentages of terminally differentiated CD4+ T cells (P = 0.001) and plasmablasts (P < 0.0001) after 6 months of treatment. These results were confirmed with the total cell number. When studied immunomodulatory cells, we observed a clear increase of monocytes expressing programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) (P = 0.005), which correlated negatively with all effector CD8+ T cell subsets. We also observed an increase in the percentage of CD8+ T cells (P = 0.028) and monocytes (P = 0.04) producing IL‐10. Conclusions Teriflunomide induces a specific reduction in effector T and B cells that have shown to play a role in MS course and an increase in immunomodulatory cells. Particularly, this drug induces the expression of PD‐L1, a molecule involved in tolerance to autoantigens, which can contribute to inhibit the abnormal immune response taking place in MS.

The potential influence of the timing of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs) on processing speed (PS) performance is critically lacking in current literature.To assess the extent to which early commencement of heDMTs would be associated with a better PS evolution as compared to moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapies (meDMTs) and delayed commencement of heDMTs.In this ongoing prospective longitudinal study, the 695 MS patients that have received a PS evaluation at 12-month of follow-up measured by the iPad®-based Processing Speed Test (PST) were retained for the analysis. All patients who had ever been prescribed a high efficacy disease-modifying therapy (heDMT) were classified in tertiles according to the proportion of their disease duration that had been on heDMTs. Based on these tertiles and the time to the first heDMT from the disease onset, patients were divided into the early heDMT group and the delayed heDMT group. Between-group differences in mean PST standardized (Z-score) change from baseline were analyzed using a linear mixed model.In the multivariable model, each year of delay in starting a heDMT was associated with increased odds of cognitive worsening at 12-month (OR = 1.0324, 95% CI = 1.014-1.062, p0.05). MeDMT-treated patients were at a significantly higher risk for cognitive worsening than early heDMT patients (OR= 2.57, 95%CI = 1.02-6.17). Linear mixed model-based adjusted mean change in PST Z-score from baseline was significantly better in those patients with the longest proportion of their disease duration treated with heDMT (highest tertile) compared to the lowest tertile (difference 0.37 [95%CI 0.02-0.92;p=0.036) and medium tertile (difference 0.39 [95%CI 0.06-0.31;p=0.037).Early he-DMT-treated patients are at significantly lower risk for cognitive worsening. Early administration of heDMTs is associated with greater cognitive functioning improvements than delayed commencement or meDMTs.

Immunosuppression (IS) and autoimmune disease (AD) are prevalent in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but their impact on its clinical course is unknown. We investigated relationships between IS, AD, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Data on consecutive admissions for COVID-19 were extracted retrospectively from medical records. Patients were assigned to one of four cohorts, according to whether or not they had an AD (AD and NAD) or were immunosuppressed (IS and NIS). The primary endpoint was development of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); secondary endpoints included death, and a composite of mechanical ventilation (MV) or death. A total of 789 patients were included: 569 (72.1%) male, 76 (9.6%) with an AD, and 63 (8.0%) with IS. Relative to the NIS-NAD cohort, patients in the IS-AD cohort had a significantly reduced risk of severe ARDS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.80; p = 0.008). No significant relationships between IS or AD status and either death or the composite of MV and death were identified, although a trend towards higher mortality was identified in the IS-NAD cohort (aHR vs NIS-NAD 1.71; 95% CI 0.94–3.12; p = 0.081). Patients in this cohort also had higher median serum levels of interleukin-6 compared with IS-AD patients (98.2 vs 21.6 pg/mL; p = 0.0328) and NIS-NAD patients (29.1 pg/mL; p = 0.0057). In conclusion, among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, those receiving immunosuppressive treatment for an AD may have a reduced risk of developing severe ARDS. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10875-020-00927-y.

Despite the increasing evidence of the benefit of corticosteroids for the treatment of moderate-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, no data are available about the potential role of high doses of steroids for these patients. We evaluated the mortality, the risk of need for mechanical ventilation (MV), or death and the risk of developing a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between high (HD) and standard doses (SD) among patients with a severe COVID-19. All consecutive confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to a single center were selected, including those treated with steroids and an ARDS. Patients were allocated to the HD (≥ 250 mg/day of methylprednisolone) of corticosteroids or the SD (≤ 1.5 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone) at discretion of treating physician. Five hundred seventy-three patients were included: 428 (74.7%) men, with a median (IQR) age of 64 (54–73) years. In the HD group, a worse baseline respiratory situation was observed and male gender, older age, and comorbidities were significantly more common. After adjusting by baseline characteristics, HDs were associated with a higher mortality than SD (adjusted OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.59–3.81, p

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease that has spread rapidly worldwide. The role of immunosuppression among COVID-19 patients has not been elucidated and management may be challenging. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in severe outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 according to immune system state. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center observational study with confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal from March 18, 2020 to April 04, 2020. The final date of follow-up was April 09, 2020.PARTICIPANTS: Confirmed COVID-19 patients. MAIN MEASURES: The primary endpoint was development of moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Time to moderate-severe ARDS, the need for mechanical or non-invasive ventilation (MV/NIV), death, and a composite of death or MV/NIV were secondary endpoints. KEY RESULTS: Of 138 patients included, 27 (19.6%) were immunosuppressed (IS), with 95 (68.8%) male patients and a median (Q1, Q3) age of 68 (54–78) years. Among the baseline characteristics, no relevant or significant differences were observed between IS and non-immunosuppressed (non-IS) patients, detecting a non-severe immunosupression among IS. A significantly lower proportion of IS patients (22.2% [95%CI, 9.8–43.0%]) compared to non-IS patients (49.5% [95%CI, 40.2–58.9%]) developed moderate-severe ARDS, in both unadjusted (OR 0.29 [95%CI, 0.11–0.76], p=0.014) and adjusted (aOR 0.16 [95%CI, 0.05–0.55], p=0.004) analyses. After stratifying by pathologies, only IS autoimmune diseases remained significant (aOR 0.12 [95%CI, 0.03–0.57], p=0.007). Non-significant trends toward a longer time to moderate or severe ARDS, a lower need for MV/NIV, and a lower risk of death or MV/NIV were detected in IS. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of COVID-19 patients, non-severe immunosuppression was associated with a lower risk of moderate-severe ARDS, especially among AD. This suggests a potential protective effect from a hypothesized host hyper-inflammatory response and warrants reconsideration of management of IS patients.

The role of immunosuppression among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has not been elucidated and management may be challenging. This observational study included confirmed COVID-19 patients. The primary endpoint was the development of moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Time to moderate-severe ARDS, the need for mechanical or noninvasive ventilation (MV/NIV), death, and a composite of death or MV/NIV were secondary endpoints. Of 138 patients included, 27 (19.6%) were immunosuppressed (IS) and 95 (68.8%) were male, with a median (IQR) age of 68 (54-78) years. A significantly lower proportion of IS patients (25.9%) compared to non-IS patients (52.3%) developed moderate-severe ARDS, in both unadjusted (0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.83; p = .017) and adjusted (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.80; p = .019) analyses. After stratifying by pathologies, only IS patients with autoimmune diseases remained significant (aOR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.98; p = .046). Nonsignificant trends toward a longer time to moderate or severe ARDS, a lower need for MV/NIV, and a lower risk of death or MV/NIV were detected among IS. In our cohort of COVID-19 patients, nonsevere immunosuppression was associated with a lower risk of moderate-severe ARDS, especially among AD. This suggests a potential protective effect from a hypothesized hyper-inflammatory response.

INTRODUCTIONDespite the increasing evidence of the benefit of corticosteroids for the treatment of moderate-severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, no data are available about the potential role of high doses of steroids for these patients.METHODSAll consecutive confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to a single center were selected, including those treated with steroids and an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patients were allocated to the high doses (HD, ≥250mg/day of methylprednisolone) of corticosteroids or the standard doses (SD, ≤1.5mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone) at discretion of treating physician. The primary endpoint was the mortality between both cohorts and secondary endpoints were the risk of need for mechanical ventilation (MV) or death and the risk of developing a severe ARDS.RESULTS573 patients were included: 428 (74.7%) men, with a median (IQR) age of 64 (54–73) years. In HD cohort, a worse baseline respiratory situation was observed and male sex, older age and comorbidities were significantly more common. After adjusting by baseline characteristics, HD were associated with a higher mortality than SD (adjusted-OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.58 – 3.83, pCONCLUSIONOur real-world experience advises against exceeding 1-1.5mg/kg/day of corticosteroids for severe COVID-19 with an ARDS, especially in older subjects. This reinforces the rationale of modulating rather than suppressing immune responses in these patients.SUMMARYIn patients with severe COVID-19, high doses of corticosteroids are associated with a higher mortality and risk of need for mechanical ventilation or death compared to standard doses. This deleterious effect is mainly observed in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease that has spread rapidly worldwide. The role of immunosuppression among COVID-19 patients has not been elucidated and management may be challenging.OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in severe outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 according to immune system state.DESIGN: Retrospective single-center observational study with confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal from March 18, 2020 to April 04, 2020. The final date of follow-up was April 09, 2020.PARTICIPANTS: Confirmed COVID-19 patients.MAIN MEASURES: The primary endpoint was development of moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Time to moderate-severe ARDS, the need for mechanical or non-invasive ventilation (MV/NIV), death, and a composite of death or MV/NIV were secondary endpoints.KEY RESULTS: Of 138 patients included, 29 (21%) were immunocompromised (IC), with 95 (68.8%) male patients and a median (IQR) age of 68 (54 – 78) years. Among the baseline characteristics, no relevant or significant differences were observed between IC and non-immunocompromised (non-IC) patients. A significantly lower proportion of IC patients (24.1% [95% CI, 11.4 – 44.0%]) compared to non-IC patients (49.5% [95% CI, 40.1 – 59.0%]) developed moderate-severe ARDS, in both unadjusted (OR 0.32 [95% CI, 0.13 – 0.82], p=0.018) and adjusted (aOR 0.16 [95% CI, 0.05 – 0.52], p=0.003) analyses. A positive non-significant trend toward a longer time to moderate or severe ARDS, a lower need for MV/NIV, and a lower risk of death or MV/NIV were detected in IC. A trend toward a shorter- hospitalization in IC was observed.CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of COVID-19 patients, immunosuppression was associated with a lower risk of moderate-severe ARDS. This suggests a potential protective effect from a hypothesized host hyper-inflammatory response and warrants reconsideration of drug discontinuation in IC patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specific respiratory tract infections, including COVID-19, may cause smell and/or taste disorders (STDs) with increased frequency. The aim was to determine whether new-onset STDs are more frequent amongst COVID-19 patients than influenza patients. METHOD: This was a case-control study including hospitalized patients of two tertiary care centres. Consecutive patients positive for COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (cases) and patients positive for influenza polymerase chain reaction (historical control sample) were assessed during specific periods, employing a self-reported STD questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-nine cases and 40 controls were included. No significant differences were found in basal features between the two groups. New-onset STDs were significantly more frequent amongst cases (31, 39.2%) than in the control group (5, 12.5 %) [adjusted odds ratio 21.4 (2.77-165.4, P = 0.003)]. COVID-19 patients with new-onset STDs were significantly younger than COVID-19 patients without STDs (52.6 ± 17.2 vs. 67.4 ± 15.1, P

Introduction Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SN+) in transcranial sonography (TCS) is frequent in Parkinson's disease (PD), while lenticular nucleus hyperechogenicity (LN+) and 3rd ventricle enlargement (3V+) are typical of Atypical Parkinsonisms (AP). However, there are no studies assessing the diagnostic yield of all TCS biomarkers in the three AP (progressive supranuclear palsy, PSP, multiple system atrophy, MSA, corticobasal degeneration, CBD). Previous references lack homogeneous criteria and data are incomprehensive. Methods Analysis of TCS performed in routine clinical practice in AP and PD patients from two tertiary hospitals. Expert recommendations were strictly followed. Previous literature was critically analysed. Results 155 AP (98 PSP, 40 MSA, 14 CBD), 254 PD, 145 control subjects were included. We confirmed good sensitivity for SN+ in PD (80%), but specificity was lower than reported (61%). LN+ and 3V + had moderate sensitivity for AP and PSP diagnosis respectively (65%, 63%), but specificity was higher than reported (87%, 91%). We confirmed high specificity and positive predictive value of the combination SN/LN (98%, 93% AP; 83%, 86% PD). The combinations of two or three echofeatures, previously unreported, showed high specificity but lower sensitivity (SN/3V: 75% sensitivity, 87% specificity PD; 42% sensitivity, 98% specificity PSP) (SN + LN+: 79% sensitivity, 86% specificity CBD) (SN/3V/LN: 67% sensitivity, 89% specificity PD; 29% sensitivity, 99% specificity PSP; 41% sensitivity, 95% specificity MSA; 57% sensitivity 91% specificity CBD). Conclusions We present a large comprehensive study of TCS, confirming its usefulness and certain limitations in AP diagnosis. Adherence to consensus criteria is critical to implement TCS for clinical and research purposes.

ObjectiveTo analyze the changes induced by ocrelizumab in blood immune cells of patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS).MethodsIn this multicenter prospective study including 53 patients with PPMS who initiated ocrelizumab treatment, we determined effector, memory, and regulatory cells by flow cytometry at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. Wilcoxon matched paired tests were used to assess differences between baseline and 6 months' results. p Values were corrected using the Bonferroni test.ResultsOcrelizumab reduced the numbers of naive and memory B cells (p < 0.0001) and those of B cells producing interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) (p < 0.0001 in all cases). By contrast, the proportions of plasmablasts and B cells producing GM-CSF and TNFα increased significantly, suggesting the need for treatment continuation. We also observed a decrease in CD20+ T-cell numbers (p < 0.0001) and percentages (p < 0.0001), and a clear remodeling of the T-cell compartment characterized by relative increases of the naive/effector ratios in CD4+ (p = 0.002) and CD8+ (p = 0.002) T cells and relative decreases of CD4+ (p = 0.03) and CD8+ (p = 0.004) T cells producing interferon-gamma. Total monocyte numbers increased (p = 0.002), but no changes were observed in those producing inflammatory cytokines. The immunologic variations were associated with a reduction of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels (p = 0.008). The reduction was observed in patients with Gd-enhanced lesions at baseline and in Gd− patients with baseline sNfL >10 pg/mL.ConclusionsIn PPMS, effector B-cell depletion changed T-cell response toward a low inflammatory profile, resulting in decreased sNfL levels.

Background HHV7 reactivation has been occasionally reported as a cause of encephalitis or myelitis in transplant recipients, but to our knowledge it has never been associated with neurological disease in HIV-infected patients. We report a case of acute myelitis in an HIV-infected patient, with sustained HHV-7 DNA amplification in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and a favourable response to foscarnet. Case report A 40 year-old man with HIV infection was admitted with asymmetric hypoesthesia in legs and paraparesis. He was receiving treatment with efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir, his CD4 count was 580/mm3 and HIV viral load was undetectable. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a focal central hyperintensity on T2 and STIR sequences, on the torathic spinal cord, with slight enhancement after intravenous gadolinium. All microbiological studies were negative except for HHV-7 DNA amplification in CSF. With a diagnosis of idiopathic transverse myelitis, treatment with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone was initiated. However, paraparesis continued worsening, and a second CSF obtained 12 days after the first one resulted again in HHV-7 amplification. Results The patient was treated with a 2 week course of foscarnet, and a rapid neurological improvement was noted. After treatment, PCR for HHV-7 in CSF was negative. Neurological exam was normal one month after treatment initiation. Conclusion HHV-7 reactivation may cause neurological disease in patients with HIV infection. Foscarnet is an effective treatment in HHV-7 associated myelitis.