Search

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary provides the results of a study of two treatments for cancer, enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab, that were studied together against locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC), a cancer that occurs most commonly in the bladder. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In the 45 patients studied, around 16% did have serious side effects, but most side effects were manageable. Twenty-four percent of patients, however, stopped the study treatment because of their side effects. Within about 2 months of starting treatment, most patients (73%) tumors were smaller and stayed smaller, on average, for more than 2 years. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab is a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer when they cannot receive the typical treatment, cisplatin. Advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer is a type of cancer where the cancer has already spread outside of the bladder or urinary tract.

Background and objective: The EV-302 trial found that the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) with pembrolizumab significantly improved survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, given the high cost of the drugs, there is a need to assess its value by considering both efficacy and cost. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of EV plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with mUC from the perspective of U.S. payers. Methods: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of EV in combination with pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in the treatment of mUC patients from U.S. payer perspective. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and lifetime costs were estimated. One-way, twoway and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. Results: Compared to chemotherapy, the combination of EV and pembrolizumab provided an additional 2.10 LYs and 1.72 QALYs, at an incremental cost of $962,240.8 per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is $558,973 per QALY. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients ineligible for cisplatin treatment had a lower ICER compared to those who were eligible for cisplatin. Conclusions: From the perspective of US payers, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, the combination of EV and pembrolizumab is estimated to not be cost-effective compared to traditional chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of mUC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multiitem gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Results: A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year. Conclusion: The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EVrelated AEs in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standard of care for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) was historically identified with platinum-based chemotherapy. Thanks to the advances in biological and genetic knowledge and technologies, new therapeutic agents have emerged in this setting recently: the immune checkpoint inhibitors and the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as the target therapy for patients harboring alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway. However, chasing a tumor's tendency to recur and progress, a new class of agents has more recently entered the scene, with promising results. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are in fact the latest addition, with enfortumab vedotin being the first to receive accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December 2019, followed by sacituzumab govitecan. Many other ADCs are still under investigation. ADCs undoubtedly represent the new frontier, with the potential of transforming the management of mUC treatment in the future. Therefore, we reviewed the landscape of mUC treatment options, giving an insight into the molecular basis and mechanisms, and evaluating new therapeutic strategies in the perspective of more and more personalized treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are two promising therapeutic modalities against many types of cancers. However, many patients develop resistance. The resistance mechanisms to ADCs and ICIs have been comprehensively illuminated in this review. A combination of ADCs and ICIs has been explored to overcome resistance to ADC or ICI single treatment. Recently, a clinical study demonstrated that a combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV), an ADC against Nectin-4, with the ICI pembrolizumab achieves remarkable clinical efficacy as the first-line therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The underlying mechanism is likely due to the enhancement of pembrolizumab-induced anticancer immunity mediated by EV. With the emerging use of combination therapy strategy, it is critical to understand the mechanism of successful and/or failed clinical studies for the future development of combination therapy of ADCs with ICIs. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) consist of an antibody backbone that recognizes and binds to a target antigen expressed on tumor cells and a small molecule chemotherapy payload that is conjugated to the antibody via a linker. ADCs are one of the most promising therapeutic modalities for the treatment of various cancers. However, many patients have developed resistance to this form of therapy. Extensive efforts have been dedicated to identifying an effective combination of ADCs with other types of anticancer therapies to potentially overcome this resistance. A recent clinical study demonstrated that a combination of the ADC enfortumab vedotin (EV) with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab can achieve remarkable clinical efficacy as the first-line therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC)—leading to the first approval of a combination therapy of an ADC with an ICI for the treatment of cancer patients. In this review, we highlight knowledge and understanding gained from the successful development of EV and the combination therapy of EV with ICI for the treatment of la/mUC. Using urothelial carcinoma as an example, we will focus on dissecting the underlying mechanisms necessary for the development of this type of combination therapy for a variety of cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate combining a monoclonal antibody targeting nectin-4 with a highly potent microtubule disrupting agent. EV is expected to be a candidate for the third-line treatment for urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Very few cases of patients experienced hyperglycemia of unknown cause. Case Presentation: We describe a 72-year-old Asian man with mild obesity, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and chemo-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma. He developed hyperglycemia and febrile neutropenia after 3 doses of EV. He had hyperglycemia of 489 mg/dL and was started on continuous intravenous insulin infusion (CVII). The patient’s intravenous insulin requirements peaked at 316 units per day. He also developed febrile neutropenia and consequent sepsis caused acute kidney injury. Continuous hemodialysis filtration (CHDF) together with antibiotics were started to treat the septic condition. The blood glucose level gradually decreased after CHDF treatment and CHDF was continued for 14 days. The timing of liberation from CHDF correlated with the elimination half-life of EV of 3.4 days. CVII was treated for 26 days and the patient was finally released from the intensive care unit. Conclusion: This case indicates that the uncontrollable hyperglycemia induced by EV during metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment is effectively managed with CVII and CHDF until the elimination of the adverse effect of EV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care (SoC) for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The benefit of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to platinum-based chemotherapy was recently investigated. We performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials comparing ICI-based treatments. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted on the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases. The results were filtered by including only reports on clinical trials or randomized clinical trials from 2018 to 2023, including 3047 patients from four clinical trials (EV302, CHECKMATE-901, IMVIGOR130, KEYNOTE-361). An IPD meta-analysis was performed by reconstructing IPD from Kaplan–Meier curves. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of Pembrolizumab + EV compared to experimental arms of the other trials of immunotherapy + chemotherapy. Results. The OS analysis showed an advantage of IPD from EV302 vs. all the other trials. For EV302 vs. KEYNOTE-361, the HR was 0.51; for EV302 vs. IMVIGOR130, the HR was 0.47; and for EV302 vs. CHECKMATE-901, the HR was 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51–0.85). In the PFS analysis, the EV302 arm showed a statistically significant advantage compared to CHECKMATE-901 (HR 0.66) and versus IMVIGOR130 (HR 0.51). Limitations: By using reconstructed IPD curves, it was not possible to adjust patient-level covariates, and the heterogeneity of the included population may have affected the pooled results. Conclusions: The EV302 experimental arm showed better OS and PFS when compared to the other immunochemotherapy combinations. An immunochemotherapy combination strategy at the beginning of treatment in mUC seems to be superior in terms of OS and PFS compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone. EV–Pembrolizumab resulted to have better outcomes compared to avelumab, rather than other immunochemotherapy combinations. However, given the heterogeneity of these studies, a longer follow up and prospective trials are needed to confirm these data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma have a poor prognosis. Enfortumab vedotin, administered after cisplatin-based chemotherapy and followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors, is widely known to prolong overall survival (OS). However, the predictive factors of enfortumab vedotin treatment that prolong OS remain unclear. In this study, patients who received enfortumab vedotin with shrinking tumors showed a significant increase in OS compared to those who received chemotherapy other than enfortumab vedotin or those who did not receive any treatment. Multivariate analysis identified neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and dysgeusia as potential predictors of OS. Patients without these factors had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those with both factors. In real-world practice, enfortumab vedotin therapy is effective for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Randomized phase III trial results have demonstrated enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-Nectin-4 human IgG1 monoclonal antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, is a useful treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for the efficacy of EV therapy and prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients in clinical practice. This study included patients with la/mUC who received ICI treatment. Patients who subsequently received EV treatment, those who received non-EV chemotherapy, and those who received no treatment were defined as EV, non-EV, and best supportive care (BSC) groups, respectively. The median OS was 20, 15, and 7 months in the EV, non-EV, and BSC groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with la/mUC who had a complete or partial response after EV treatment had a significantly prolonged OS compared with those with stable or progressive disease. Univariate analysis showed age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), dysgeusia, and rash as independent predictors of OS improvement. NLR and dysgeusia were independent predictors of OS after EV in multivariate analysis. Patients without these factors had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those with both factors. In real-world practice, EV therapy is an effective treatment for patients with la/mUC after ICI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel type of targeted cancer therapy combining the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxicity of conventional chemotherapy. Recently, ADCs have demonstrated practice‐changing efficacy across diverse solid cancers. The anti‐NECTIN‐4 ADC enfortumab vedotin (EV) has just been approved for patients with urothelial cancer and is currently under investigation for patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC e.g. Phase II ENCORE trial). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of EV in established prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines and to examine the membranous NECTIN‐4 expression in primary tumours (PRIM) and distant metastases (MET). NECTIN‐4 was heterogeneously expressed in the panel of PCa cell lines. EV led to growth inhibition in NECTIN‐4 expressing PCa cells (22Rv1 and LNCaP), whereas the NECTIN‐4‐negative PC‐3 cells were significantly less responsive to EV, emphasizing the dependence of EV response on its target expression. Immunohistochemical staining revealed moderate membranous NECTIN‐4 expression only in a small subgroup of CRPC patients with lung and peritoneal MET [n = 3/22 with H‐score ≥100, median H‐score 140 (IQR 130–150)], while 100% of PRIM (n = 48/48) and 86.4% of common MET sites (n = 19/22), including lymph node, bone and liver MET, were NECTIN‐4 negative. In summary, EV may be effective in NECTIN‐4‐positive PCa. However, our findings demonstrate that the tumoural NECTIN‐4 expression is predominantly low in metastatic PCa, which suggests that EV may only be effective in a biomarker‐stratified subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel treatment option for patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed after chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Two patients at two different New England tertiary cancer care centers were treated with EV while concurrently receiving hemodialysis (HD), where a complete response to EV in both patients was noted. The use of EV in patients requiring HD is extrapolated from the available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic literature on monoclonal antibodies in patients requiring HD. There is a paucity of data for the use of antibody-drug conjugates like EV in patients needing dialysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: For metastatic urothelial cancer (UC), platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy are used, with newer treatments like monoclonal antibodies (e.g., pembrolizumab) showing varied success. Traditional treatments often fail to provide long-term responses. Advances in molecular understanding of UC have led to targeted therapies, identifying six UC subclasses influencing treatment responses. Promising drugs include the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor erdafitinib and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). ADCs represent a significant advancement in UC treatment, using monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents to target cancer cells. UC is suitable for ADC therapy due to high antigen expression, enhancing efficacy while reducing systemic toxicity. Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors, advanced UC progresses rapidly with poor survival rates. Notable ADCs include enfortumab vedotin, effective alone and with pembrolizumab, and sacituzumab govitecan, showing effectiveness in studies. This review covers ADC mechanisms, mono- and combination therapies, resistance, and future perspectives, highlighting ADCs' vital role in treating UC. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been a significant advancement in cancer therapy, particularly for urothelial cancer (UC). These innovative treatments, originally developed for hematological malignancies, use target-specific monoclonal antibodies linked to potent cytotoxic agents. This rational drug design efficiently delivers cancer cell-killing agents to cells expressing specific surface proteins, which are abundant in UC owing to their high antigen expression. UC is an ideal candidate for ADC therapy, as it enhances on-target efficacy while mitigating systemic toxicity. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the biology and mechanisms of tumor progression in UC. However, despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, advanced UC is characterized by rapid progression and poor survival rates. Targeted therapies that have been developed include the anti-nectin 4 ADC enfortumab vedotin and the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor erdafitinib. Enfortumab vedotin has shown efficacy in prospective studies in patients with advanced UC, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab. The anti-Trop-2 ADC sacituzumab govitecan has also demonstrated effectiveness in single-armed studies. This review highlights the mechanism of action of ADCs, their application in mono- and combination therapies, primary mechanisms of resistance, and future perspectives for their clinical use in UC treatment. ADCs have proven to be an increasingly vital component of the therapeutic landscape for urothelial carcinoma, filling a gap in the treatment of this progressive disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Recently, numerous treatments have been approved for patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. These combinations prolong survival compared to chemotherapy, which is generally considered the standard of care. Since direct head-to-head comparisons between these innovative treatments are not available, our analysis was aimed at performing indirect comparisons among these agents, including chemotherapy as a common comparator. In handling these indirect comparisons, our study used an innovative evidence-based method (the IPDfromKM technique) that reconstructs individual patient data from published clinical trials. Overall survival was the endpoint of our analysis. Our results showed that enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was the most effective treatment at levels of statistical significance. The combinations of a PD(L)-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy ranked second, while monotherapies with a PD(L)-1 inhibitor ranked third. One strength of this analysis is represented by the large number of different treatments that were evaluated and compared to each other. Background: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer have been conventionally treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, numerous new treatments have been proposed to improve overall survival (OS) and reduce adverse effects, but no direct head-to-head comparisons among these agents are available. Methods: The treatments evaluated in our analyses included (a) monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); (b) combinations of an ICI with chemotherapy; and (c) combinations of an ICI with other drugs. Using OS as the endpoint, a series of indirect comparisons were performed to rank the most effective regimens against both chemotherapy and each other. Our analysis was based on the application of an artificial intelligence software program (IPDfromKM method) that reconstructs individual patient data from the information reported in the graphs of Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: A total of five studies published in six articles were included. In our main analysis, nivolumab plus chemotherapy showed better OS compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.82), while durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed no OS benefit (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11). More interestingly, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab significantly prolonged OS compared to both chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.45–0.63) and nivolumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.60–0.97). Discussion and conclusion: Among new treatments for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed the best efficacy in terms of OS. Our results support the use of this combination as a first-line treatment in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody drug conjugate approved for management of pretreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, which is associated with a rare risk of drug extravasation and soft tissue reactions. CASE REPORT: We report two cases of EV extravasation with subsequent development of bullae and cellulitis. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: They were both treated for cellulitis and had conservative management without surgical intervention and were able to resume treatment with Enfortumab vedotin without subsequent adverse events. DISCUSSION: We propose that EV acts as a vesicant upon extravasation, highlight measures to prevent extravasation events, and encourage appropriate measures when dealing such as attempt of aspiration, removal of catheter, application of compresses, and thorough documentation with photographic evidence.

Introduction. Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care (SoC) for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The benefit of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to platinum-based chemotherapy was recently investigated. We performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials comparing ICI-based treatments. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted on the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases. The results were filtered by including only reports on clinical trials or randomized clinical trials from 2018 to 2023, including 3047 patients from four clinical trials (EV302, CHECKMATE-901, IMVIGOR130, KEYNOTE-361). An IPD meta-analysis was performed by reconstructing IPD from Kaplan–Meier curves. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of Pembrolizumab + EV compared to experimental arms of the other trials of immunotherapy + chemotherapy. Results. The OS analysis showed an advantage of IPD from EV302 vs. all the other trials. For EV302 vs. KEYNOTE-361, the HR was 0.51; for EV302 vs. IMVIGOR130, the HR was 0.47; and for EV302 vs. CHECKMATE-901, the HR was 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51–0.85). In the PFS analysis, the EV302 arm showed a statistically significant advantage compared to CHECKMATE-901 (HR 0.66) and versus IMVIGOR130 (HR 0.51). Limitations: By using reconstructed IPD curves, it was not possible to adjust patient-level covariates, and the heterogeneity of the included population may have affected the pooled results. Conclusions: The EV302 experimental arm showed better OS and PFS when compared to the other immunochemotherapy combinations. An immunochemotherapy combination strategy at the beginning of treatment in mUC seems to be superior in terms of OS and PFS compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone. EV–Pembrolizumab resulted to have better outcomes compared to avelumab, rather than other immunochemotherapy combinations. However, given the heterogeneity of these studies, a longer follow up and prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate combining a monoclonal antibody targeting nectin-4 with a highly potent microtubule disrupting agent. EV is expected to be a candidate for the third-line treatment for urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Very few cases of patients experienced hyperglycemia of unknown cause. Case Presentation: We describe a 72-year-old Asian man with mild obesity, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and chemo-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma. He developed hyperglycemia and febrile neutropenia after 3 doses of EV. He had hyperglycemia of 489 mg/dL and was started on continuous intravenous insulin infusion (CVII). The patient’s intravenous insulin requirements peaked at 316 units per day. He also developed febrile neutropenia and consequent sepsis caused acute kidney injury. Continuous hemodialysis filtration (CHDF) together with antibiotics were started to treat the septic condition. The blood glucose level gradually decreased after CHDF treatment and CHDF was continued for 14 days. The timing of liberation from CHDF correlated with the elimination half-life of EV of 3.4 days. CVII was treated for 26 days and the patient was finally released from the intensive care unit. Conclusion: This case indicates that the uncontrollable hyperglycemia induced by EV during metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment is effectively managed with CVII and CHDF until the elimination of the adverse effect of EV.

The landscape of treatment for first-line therapy in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has rapidly changed in the last year alone. Maintenance avelumab remains a viable treatment option for many patients across the globe for those who have responded or have achieved stable disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the recent FDA approvals based on EV-302 for enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab, as well as CheckMate-904 with gemcitabine and cisplatin with nivolumab (GC+N) followed by maintenance nivolumab have left clinicians with the complicated decision of determining which regimen is most appropriate for their individual patients with untreated aUC. This commentary highlights the key trials that have set the standard-of-care for front-line aUC treatment and suggestions for choosing different regimens for the appropriate patient.

Introduction Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody‐drug conjugate targeting Nectin‐4 for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients previously treated with platinum‐containing chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Common adverse events include rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia. However, there are no reports on the development of myelodysplastic syndrome during enfortumab vedotin therapy in clinical settings. Case presentation A 72‐year‐old male patient experienced prolonged and severe thrombocytopenia 18 weeks after the start of enfortumab vedotin therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, requiring daily platelet transfusions. Bone marrow examination and chromosomal analysis confirmed the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Treatment with eltrombopag proved to be effective. Conclusion This is the first report of the development of myelodysplastic syndrome during enfortumab vedotin therapy in a clinical setting. Although rare, myelodysplastic syndrome can occur during enfortumab vedotin therapy.

Introduction Few studies have reported on administering enfortumab vedotin to patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and end‐stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. Case presentation Case 1: An 85‐year‐old man underwent hemodialysis for progressive renal failure 4 months after right laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Case 2: A 73‐year‐old man underwent hemodialysis after two laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomies for recurrent urothelial carcinoma. In both cases, enfortumab vedotin was administered due to postoperative recurrence and progression despite platinum‐based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. Partial response and disease progression were observed in cases 1 and 2, respectively. Adverse events included a mild skin rash in both patients and neutropenia in Case 1, both of which resolved with symptomatic treatment. Conclusion The efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and end‐stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis, were confirmed.

Objective: In December 2021, enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody‐drug conjugate directed against nectin‐4, was approved in Japan as a new treatment after platinum‐containing chemotherapy and PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors. This study evaluated, using real‐world data, the efficacy and safety of EV therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Materials and methods: Fifty‐five patients with mUC who discontinued pembrolizumab therapy due to disease progression between June 2018 and April 2023 at Yokohama City University Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Of the 55 patients, 25 received EV therapy (EV group) and 30 did not (non‐EV group). All patients who underwent EV therapy were diagnosed with disease progression after the approval of EV in Japan. Results: The median (range) follow‐up period after pembrolizumab discontinuation was 6.3 (0.7–31.1) months. There were eight (32.0%) deaths due to cancer in the EV group and 27 (90.0%) in the non‐EV group. The overall survival (OS) after pembrolizumab discontinuation was not reached in the EV group versus 2.6 months in the non‐EV group (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that EV therapy (EV vs. non‐EV group; hazard ratio 0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.41; p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Conclusion: EV prolonged OS in mUC following pembrolizumab therapy in real‐world data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline eUpdate addresses developments in first-line therapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. • Enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab (EV–P) is the new standard of care in first-line advanced urothelial carcinoma. • Nivolumab–cisplatin–gemcitabine or platinum-based ChT and maintenance avelumab are alternatives if EV–P is not possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC) presents a significant clinical challenge, often requiring aggressive surgical intervention for optimal management. We present a case of an 84-year-old woman with recurrent high-grade papillary UTUC of the left renal pelvis, refractory to prior endourologic interventions, who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin (Pembro/EV) due to contraindications to cisplatin therapy. Following a favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy, the patient underwent laparoscopic left radical nephroureterectomy, achieving a pathologic complete response. We discuss the utility of Pembro/EV in the perioperative management of patients with UTUC, particularly in those ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy. In addition, we highlight the potential role of somatic mutation testing and the integration of novel therapeutic agents such as olaparib in personalized treatment strategies for UTUC. This case underscores the importance of exploring innovative treatment approaches and optimizing patient selection for kidney preservation strategies in the management of UTUC. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to elucidate the full therapeutic potential of Pembro/EV and other emerging therapies in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). Enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate directed to Nectin-4, and pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, are two therapies that have individually provided a survival benefit in patients with la/mUC. The combination regimen of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was evaluated in EV-302 (KEYNOTEA39; NCT0422385), a phase 3 study that showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and a key secondary endpoint of overall response rate versus chemotherapy. Based on these results and those from the EV-103 (KEYNOTE-869; NCT03288545) Dose Escalation cohort, Cohort A, and Cohort K, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab was granted approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with la/mUC. While guidelines and recommendations for the management of adverse events (AEs) have been developed for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and enfortumab vedotin monotherapy, additional guidance is needed for managing AEs that occur with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. As monotherapies, enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab are both associated with some of the AEs observed with the combination, such as skin reactions, pneumonitis, and diarrhea, which may confound the attribution of the AE to a specific agent and thereby complicate clinical management. In this manuscript, we aim to provide recommendations for best practice for patient care and the management of AEs of clinical interest for patients with la/mUC receiving enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, including skin reactions, peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia, and pneumonitis. These recommendations were developed based on published guidelines, expert opinions, and the clinical experience of the authors, which include oncologist, advanced practice provider, nursing, and pharmacy perspectives. In addition, guidance on patient education and communication is provided. With vigilant monitoring, early detection, and prompt intervention of treatment-emergent AEs based on recommended approaches described herein, it is the authors' experience that most AEs can be managed with supportive therapy and dose modification/interruptions, allowing patients to continue treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors and enfortumab vedotin have opened new avenues for sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). In the pre‐enfortumab vedotin era, many patients could not receive third‐line treatment owing to rapid disease progression and poor general status. This study aimed to analyze real‐world sequential treatment practices for la/mUC in Japan, with a focus on patients who do not receive third‐line treatment. Methods: We analyzed data for 1023 la/mUC patients diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2021 at 54 institutions from a Japanese nationwide cohort. Results: At the median follow‐up of 28.5 months, the median overall survival from first‐line initiation for 905 patients who received systemic anticancer treatment was 19.1 months. Among them, 81% and 32% received second‐ and third‐line treatment. Notably, 52% had their treatment terminated before the opportunity for third‐line treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low performance status (≥1), elevated neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (≥3), and low body mass index (<21 kg/m2) at the start of first‐line treatment were independent risk factors for not proceeding to third‐line treatment (p = 0.0024, 0.0069, and 0.0058, respectively). In this cohort, 33% had one of these factors, 36% had two, and 15% had all three. Conclusions: This study highlights the high frequency of factors associated with poor tolerance to anticancer treatment in la/mUC patients. The findings suggest the need to establish optimal sequential treatment strategies, maximizing efficacy within time and tolerance constraints, while concurrently providing strong supportive care, considering immunological and nutritional aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody‐drug conjugate directed against Nectin‐4 that is used to treat urothelial carcinoma. Nectin‐4 is inherently expressed in the skin and adnexal structures. Since therapeutic options for cutaneous adnexal carcinomas are limited, we sought to evaluate Nectin‐4 expression in adnexal carcinomas and benign adnexal neoplasms to identify tumors that are potentially targetable with EV. Methods: Eight sebaceous carcinomas (seven periocular and one lymph node metastasis), eight digital papillary adenocarcinomas, seven squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas, eight poromas, eight trichilemmomas, and seven sebaceous adenomas were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for anti‐Nectin‐4 antibody. H‐scores for Nectin‐4 expression were calculated. Results: Benign adnexal neoplasms had a significantly lower mean (±SD) Nectin‐4 H‐score (142.6 ± 39.1) than did the adnexal carcinomas (198 ± 90.8; p = 0.006). Nectin‐4 was expressed in 91% (21/23) of adnexal carcinomas. Sebaceous carcinomas frequently exhibited high expression of Nectin‐4 (88% [7/8]), with a mean (±SD) H‐score (258.1 ± 58.4) significantly higher than those for digital papillary adenocarcinomas (197.5 ± 52.5; p = 0.035) and squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas (131.4 ± 114.1; p = 0.031). Sebaceous carcinomas also had significantly higher H‐scores than did sebaceous adenomas (186.4 ± 25.0; p = 0.013). Conclusions: Increased Nectin‐4 expression in a subset of cutaneous adnexal carcinomas, particularly sebaceous carcinomas, reveals that EV is a potential therapeutic option for these tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastatic bladder carcinoma is a cancer with a poor prognosis, for which treatments have remained the same for several decades. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of several solid cancers, significantly improving the prognosis of some patients. Several protocols have been evaluated this treatment in bladder cancer, in first or second line, with conflicting results. However, two recent studies evaluating immunotherapy either with cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugated (ADC), have demonstrated their benefits in terms of overall survival as a first-line treatment, thus redefining the standard of care for patients. Immunotherapy is also being evaluated in the peri-operative setting, with encouraging results for patients with localized or locally advanced bladder cancer. In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody–drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We aimed to investigate potential prognostic markers for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Asian patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We retrospectively enrolled 61 Japanese patients treated with enfortumab vedotin therapy and analyzed overall survival, adverse events, and potential prognostic markers. Enrolled patients (38 men, 23 women; median age 74 [IQR: 68–79] years) had bladder cancer (26 patients) or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (35 patients). Our study provides real-world data showing that enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in Asian patients similar to the EV-301 trial. Additionally, the C-reactive protein level might be considered a prognostic marker of enfortumab vedotin therapy in such patients. Background: In the EV-301 trial, enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based therapy and programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor. However, real-world Asian data are limited, and potential prognostic markers are non-existent. We aimed to investigate potential prognostic markers for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Asian patients. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 61 Japanese patients treated with enfortumab vedotin therapy at our hospital and affiliated hospitals between January 2019 and September 2023. Results: Enrolled patients (38 men, 23 women; median age 74 [IQR: 68–79] years) had bladder cancer (26 patients) or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (35 patients). Fifty-four patients reported adverse events (grade >3 in 12). Skin disorders, pruritus, and neuropathy were common adverse effects. The median overall survival was 17.1 months (95% confidence interval: 10.0–not applicable). In multivariate analysis, the C-reactive protein level was an independent marker predicting favorable overall survival with enfortumab vedotin. Patient characteristics did not differ between C-reactive protein-high and -low groups. Conclusions: Our study provides real-world data showing that enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in Asian patients similar to the EV-301 trial. Additionally, the C-reactive protein level might be considered a prognostic marker of enfortumab vedotin therapy in such patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enfortumab vedotin is a novel antibody–drug conjugate used as a third-line therapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer. We aimed to elucidate the effect of enfortumab vedotin-related peripheral neuropathy on its efficacy and whether enfortumab vedotin-induced early electrophysiological changes could be associated with peripheral neuropathy onset. Methods: Our prospective multicenter cohort study enrolled 34 patients with prior platinum-containing chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitor-resistant advanced urothelial carcinoma and received enfortumab vedotin. The best overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety were assessed. Nerve conduction studies were also performed in 11 patients. Results: The confirmed overall response rate and disease control rate were 52.9% and 73.5%, respectively. The median overall progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 and 13.5 months, respectively, during a median follow-up of 8.6 months. The patients with disease control had significantly longer treatment continuation and overall survival than did those with uncontrolled disease. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 12.5% of the patients. The overall response and disease control rates were 83.3% and 100%, respectively: higher than those in patients without peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.028 and p = 0.029, respectively). Nerve conduction studies indicated that enfortumab vedotin reduced nerve conduction velocity more markedly in sensory nerves than in motor nerves and the lower limbs than in the upper limbs, with the sural nerve being the most affected in the patients who developed peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.011). Conclusion: Our results indicated the importance of focusing on enfortumab vedotin-induced neuropathy of the sural nerve to maximize efficacy and improve safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractA time-course questionnaire survey using the chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAS) was conducted in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. A total of 37 patients receiving systemic therapy with enfortumab vedotin (EV), platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors were included in this study. No significant changes were observed in any of the CiTAS subscales during platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, while EV therapy induced significant dysgeusia. Among 10 patients treated with EV, dysgeusia was associated with a substantial negative effect on the health-related quality-of-life domains, particularly global health status/QOL (mean ± standard deviation: 52 ± 19 in dysgeusia group vs 89 ± 13 in non-dysgeusia group) and mental component summary (47 ± 5.1 vs 53 ± 2.0). The fatigue symptom score was higher in the dysgeusia group at the post-third cycle of EV (47 ± 16 vs 15 ± 17). Severe dysgeusia can be induced by EV therapy, which is usually not observed in other systemic therapies for advanced UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore the characteristics of patients and assess the effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in those with treatment‐resistant advanced urothelial cancer in a real‐world setting. Patients and Methods: A multicenter observational study was conducted on 103 evaluable patients with advanced urothelial cancer who received EV. Outcomes were assessed by radiographic response, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), with treatment‐related adverse events (trAEs). Radiographic response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, while trAEs were studied in line with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: The median follow‐up was 8.9 months (range, 0.1–16.4). The observed objective response rate was 50.5%. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.7–9.8), and the median OS was 14.5 months (95% CI: 12.4–not reached). Out of the 103 patients, 19 (18.4%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or more, 14 (14.7%) had an non‐urothelial carcinoma histology, and 40 (38.3%) had at least one pre‐existing comorbidity. There were 26 (25.2%) patients who reported 49 trAEs, with 9 (18.3%) being grade 3 or higher. The most common trAEs included rash, occurring in 18.4%. Conclusions: This study describes the characteristics and outcomes of patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer receiving EV. The findings demonstrate that EV showed robust anti‐tumor activity and had manageable safety profiles outside the clinical trial setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 76-year-old man presented with macrohematuria. A sessile nodular tumor was identified on the right wall of the bladder, along with enlarged right external iliac lymph nodes. He underwent transurethral resection of the bladder and was diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer cT3N1M0. After Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GC) therapy was administered in three courses, the right external iliac lymph nodes became reduced in size. In December 2020, radical cystectomy was performed. Six months post-surgery, para-aortic lymph node metastasis and malignant pleural effusion were detected, leading to five additional courses of GC therapy, which resulted in complete response. However, three months after completing the GC therapy, a recurrence of the para-aortic lymph node metastasis was noted. Three courses of Pembrolizumab were administered, but further enlargement of para-aortic lymph nodes, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and associated esophageal stenosis causing difficulty in oral intake occurred. As a third-line therapy, Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) therapy was administered. After initiating the EV therapy each lymph node metastasis became reduced in size, while the esophageal stenosis, as well as the pleural effusion, disappeared. Adverse events related to EV included Grade 2 pruritus and Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. After one year and three months of EV treatment, there is no evidence of disease progression, and the patient continues to receive EV therapy without disease progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody–drug conjugate approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the difference in efficacy of EV after each ICIs and prognostic factors are not well known. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EV in patients with metastatic UC who were treated with avelumab or pembrolizumab and to identify the prognostic factors. Methods: The records of 100 patients with advanced metastatic UC who received EV after the administration of either avelumab or pembrolizumab were retrospectively collected from five academic hospitals in Japan. Results: The median follow-up period was 6.7 months. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the EV after avelumab/pembrolizumab group were not reached/14.7 months (p = 0.17) and 10.4/5.2 months (p = 0.039), respectively. The objective response rates (ORR) were 66.6% and 46.8% in EV after avelumab and EV after pembrolizumab groups, respectively (p = 0.14). Multivariate analysis identified histological variants, liver metastasis, low serum albumin levels, and high serum CRP level as significant poor prognostic factors. The median OS and PFS of cachexia patients with both low serum albumin levels and high serum CRP levels were 6.0 months and 0.93 months, respectively. Conclusion: PFS was superior in patients treated with EV after avelumab to EV after pembrolizumab. However, OS showed no significant difference between the two groups. Because the prognosis of patients with cachexia is extremely poor, the initiation of EV should be discussed in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab (EV-PEMB) was investigated as a first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in a phase III clinical trial (EV-302). The trial findings indicated significant prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy with a favorable safety profile. However, EV-PEMB is costly and it is unknown whether it is cost-effective compared to chemotherapy. This study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of EV-PEMB versus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced UC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.MethodsA Markov model with three distinct health states was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of EV-PEMB as a first-line treatment for advanced UC versus chemotherapy based on the EV-302 trial. Drug costs were obtained from national tender prices. Other expenses and utility values were sourced from the literature or expert advice. The findings of the study included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We conducted a one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to ensure the model’s robustness.ResultsThe EV-PEMB regimen demonstrated a gain of 3.22 QALYs at $375,420.24, compared to the chemotherapy regimen with 1.70 QALYs at $23,369.67. ICER for EV-PEMB compared to chemotherapy was at $232,256.16 per QALY gained. In China, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,133 per QALY, EV-PEMB has a 0% probability of being cost-effective as a first-line treatment for advanced UC compared to chemotherapy.ConclusionFrom the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, EV-PEMB is unlikely to be a cost-effective first-line treatment option for advanced UC compared to chemotherapy.

Purpose: To analyze the risk of enfortumab vedotin (EV), a targeted therapy for advanced bladder cancer, using real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2020 to Q1 2024. Adverse drug events (ADEs) related to EV were identified and categorized according to the System Organ Classes (SOCs) and specific events. Statistical methods, such as the proportional reporting ratio, reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean were used to detect safety signals. Results: Of the 7,449,181 FAERS case reports, 1,617 EV-related ADEs were identified, including 101 preferred terms and 22 SOCs. The key SOCs included skin and subcutaneous tissue, metabolic, and nutritional disorders. Rare ADEs, such as lichenoid keratosis (n = 4; ROR 26.89), small intestinal perforation (n = 3; ROR 24.51), pigmentation disorder (n = 9; ROR 18.16), and cholangitis (n = 8; ROR 17.48), showed significant disproportionality. Conclusion: While most findings aligned with the existing data, new signs such as lichenoid keratosis and small intestinal perforation were identified. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and emphasize the need for the clinical monitoring of EV-related ADEs.

BackgroundEnfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for patients with treatment-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), however data on biomarkers of response is lacking.MethodsWe retrospectively identified all aUC patients at our institution who received EV monotherapy and had next-generation sequencing (NGS) data available. Patients were considered responders if they had a complete response or partial response on restaging scans during treatment. Observed response rate (ORR) was evaluated by local investigator and compared between responders and non-responders using Chi-squared test. A univariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard test to assess for associations between baseline characteristics and most common somatic alterations (in ≥10% of patients) with patient survival outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. Somatic alterations were then individually evaluated in separate multivariate models while accounting for patient and clinical characteristics using Cox regression models.ResultsAmong 29 patients treated with EV monotherapy, 27 had available NGS data. Median age was 70, 24 (83%) were men, 19 (62%) were Caucasian, 15 (52%) had pure urothelial histology and 22 (76%) had primary tumor in the bladder. ORR was 41%, and PFS and OS for the overall cohort were 5.1 months and 10.2 months. Responders were enriched among patients with TP53, KDM6A and MDM2 alterations. Patients with these alterations, as well as those with composite TP53/MDM2 alterations (alterations in either TP53 or MDM2), also had increased ORR with EV treatment compared to patients without these alterations. In the univariable analysis, baseline albumin level ≥ 3.0g/dL and presence of composite TP53/MDM2 alterations were associated with a prolonged OS. Baseline ECOG 0/1, TP53 alterations and TP53/MDM2 alterations were associated with a prolonged PFS. In the multivariable analysis, TP53 and TP53/MDM2 alterations were genomic markers predictive of improved PFS after accounting for the relevant clinical characteristics.ConclusionIn this single-center retrospective analysis of aUC patients treated with EV, presence of TP53 or MDM2 somatic alterations, lower ECOG PS scores (ECOG 0 or 1) and higher albumin levels (≥3 g/dL) were associated with improved outcomes with EV treatment. Prospective and external validation of these findings in larger cohorts is warranted.

Introduction In addition to reduced nectin‐4 expression, the upregulation of ATP‐binding cassette transporters has been suggested as a potential mechanism of resistance to enfortumab vedotin. Case presentation A 76‐year‐old man previously treated with platinum‐containing chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for metastatic bladder cancer was administered enfortumab vedotin because of disease progression. Subsequently, metastasectomy was performed for oligometastatic lesions (in the lung and adrenal gland) that exhibited growth during enfortumab vedotin therapy. Immunostaining analysis revealed decreased nectin‐4 expression and elevated MDR1, MRP1, and BCRP expression in the metastatic lesions. Conclusion Decreased nectin‐4 expression and increased ATP‐binding cassette transporter expression are potential factors in the development of enfortumab vedotin resistance in urothelial carcinoma. Immunohistochemical evaluation of these proteins may aid in predicting treatment efficacy.

Subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC), defined here as urothelial carcinoma with any histologic subtype or divergent differentiation, is a clinically aggressive disease. However, the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) against SUC remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with SUC treated with EV for metastatic disease. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who received EV after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy at six institutions. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and those with SUC. We identified 44 and 18 patients with PUC and SUC, respectively. Squamous differentiation was the most common subtype element, followed by glandular differentiation and sarcomatoid subtype. Although patients with SUC had a comparable ORR to those with PUC, the duration of response for SUC was short. Patients with SUC had poorer PFS than those with PUC; however, no significant difference was observed in OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUC was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Although the response of metastatic SUC to EV was similar to that of PUC, SUC showed faster progression than PUC.

This study presents the enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment analysis at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treated with EV between January 2021 and October 2023. EV was administered at 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to assess the treatment response. Patient characteristics, treatment histories, response rates, progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated. Response rates were determined, and adverse events were recorded. Among the 20 patients, 70% were male and 65% had bladder tumors. Most patients had lung (65%) or lymph node (65%) metastases. The median follow-up was 11.2 months, with 45% of the patients succumbing to the disease. The overall response rate was 55%. The median progression-free and median overall survivals were 10.5 and 12.9 months, respectively. Severe adverse events occurred in 35% of patients. In this real-world study, EV demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles in Japanese patients with mUC. The study’s results were consistent with previous clinical trials, although a longer follow-up was required. Our findings support EV use as a treatment option for patients with mUC who exhibit disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting TROP2, which has recently been approved for treatment-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). However, the variability of TROP2 expression across different bladder cancer (BC) subtypes, as well as after enfortumab vedotin (EV) exposure, remains unknown. Using gene expression data from four clinical cohorts with >1400 patient samples of muscle-invasive BC and a BC tissue microarray, we found that TROP2 mRNA and protein are highly expressed across basal, luminal, and stroma-rich subtypes, but depleted in the neuroendocrine subtype. In addition, TROP2 mRNA levels are correlated with NECTIN4 mRNA but are more highly expressed than NECTIN4 mRNA in patient cohorts and BC cell lines. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockdown of TROP2 demonstrates that its expression is one factor governing SG sensitivity. After prolonged EV exposure, cells can downregulate NECTIN4, leading to EV resistance, but retain TROP2 expression and remain sensitive to SG, suggesting nonoverlapping resistance mechanisms to these ADCs. While our findings warrant further validation, they have significant implications for biomarker development, patient selection, and treatment sequencing in the clinic as well as clinical trial design and stratification for metastatic BC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the expression levels of the drug target TROP2 across different molecular subtypes of bladder cancer in multiple patient cohorts and cell lines. We found high levels of TROP2 in most subtypes except in the neuroendocrine subtype. Overall, TROP2 gene expression is higher than NECTIN4 gene expression, and cells resistant to enfortumab vedotin (EV), a NECTIN4-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, remain sensitive to sacituzumab govitecan (SG). Our findings suggest that SG may be effective across most bladder cancer subtypes, including the bladder cancers previously treated with EV.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) for more than two decades. However, many patients with comorbidities cannot receive cisplatin or its alternative, carboplatin. 'Cisplatin-ineligible' and 'platinum-ineligible' patients lacked effective therapy options. However, the recent combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody–drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, with pembrolizumab (P), an antibody targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint, is changing the status quo of frontline mUC treatment, with potential synergy seen in the EV-103 and EV-302 clinical trials. First, we review the working definitions of 'cisplatin ineligibility' and 'platinum ineligibility' in mUC clinical trials and the standard of care in both categories. Then, we review select clinical trials for frontline treatment of cisplatin- and platinum-ineligible mUC patients on ClinicalTrials.gov. We classify the investigated drugs in these trials by their therapeutic strategies. Alongside chemotherapy combinations, the field is witnessing more immunotherapy combinations with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, bicycle toxin conjugates, bispecific antibodies, innovative targeted therapies, and many others. Most importantly, we rethink the value of classifying patients by cisplatin or platinum ineligibility in the frontline setting in the post-EVP era. Lastly, we discuss new priority goals to tailor predictive, monitoring, and prognostic biomarkers to these emergent therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are very few therapeutic options to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Cancer (UC). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was recently approved by the FDA and has become a new therapeutic option for patients previously managed with conventional treatments. Despite its efficacy, EV carries the potential for infrequent yet severe adverse effects. In this report, we present a case of a patient undergoing EV treatment for urothelial carcinoma who developed refractory diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) unresponsive to escalating insulin doses and necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy. While DKA was resolved, the patient eventually succumbed to progressive maculopapular skin rash, liver failure, and respiratory failure. Additionally, the study delves into a review of cases of EV-induced refractory DKA in the literature, shedding light on the similarities in patient profiles, timelines of adverse effects and the treatment strategies employed to manage the ensuing complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC), defined here as urothelial carcinoma with any histologic subtype or divergent differentiation, is a clinically aggressive disease. However, the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) against SUC remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients with SUC treated with EV for metastatic disease. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who received EV after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy at six institutions. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and those with SUC. We identified 44 and 18 patients with PUC and SUC, respectively. Squamous differentiation was the most common subtype element, followed by glandular differentiation and sarcomatoid subtype. Although patients with SUC had a comparable ORR to those with PUC, the duration of response for SUC was short. Patients with SUC had poorer PFS than those with PUC; however, no significant difference was observed in OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUC was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Although the response of metastatic SUC to EV was similar to that of PUC, SUC showed faster progression than PUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents the enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment analysis at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treated with EV between January 2021 and October 2023. EV was administered at 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to assess the treatment response. Patient characteristics, treatment histories, response rates, progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated. Response rates were determined, and adverse events were recorded. Among the 20 patients, 70% were male and 65% had bladder tumors. Most patients had lung (65%) or lymph node (65%) metastases. The median follow-up was 11.2 months, with 45% of the patients succumbing to the disease. The overall response rate was 55%. The median progression-free and median overall survivals were 10.5 and 12.9 months, respectively. Severe adverse events occurred in 35% of patients. In this real-world study, EV demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles in Japanese patients with mUC. The study's results were consistent with previous clinical trials, although a longer follow-up was required. Our findings support EV use as a treatment option for patients with mUC who exhibit disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The antibody-drug conjugates sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) are standard monotherapies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Given the different targets and payloads, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SG + EV in a phase I trial in mUC (NCT04724018). Patients with mUC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 who had progressed on platinum and/or immunotherapy were enrolled. SG + EV were administered on days 1 + 8 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1. The number of patients treated at each of four pre-specified dose levels (DLs) and the maximum tolerated doses in combination (MTD) were determined using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. Between May 2021 and April 2023, 24 patients were enrolled; 1 patient never started therapy and was excluded from the analysis. Median age was 70 years (range 41-88 years); 11 patients received ≥3 lines of therapy. Seventy-eight percent (18/23) of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) regardless of attribution at any DL, with one grade 5 AE (pneumonitis possibly related to EV). The recommended phase II doses are SG 8 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support; MTDs are SG 10 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg. The objective response rate was 70% (16/23, 95% confidence interval 47% to 87%) with three complete responses; three patients had progressive disease as best response. With a median follow-up of 14 months, 9/23 patients have ongoing response including 6 responses lasting over 12 months. The combination of SG + EV was assessed at different DLs and a safe dose for phase II was identified. The combination had encouraging activity in patients with mUC with high response rates, including clinically significant complete responses. Additional study of this combination is warranted. • This is the first trial in any malignancy to show that antibody-drug conjugates could be safely given in combination. • Combination MTD was SG 10 mg/kg and EV 1.25 mg/kg days 1+8 every 21 days with no new safety signals compared to monotherapy. • Combination recommended phase II dose is SG 8 mg/kg + EV 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8 of every 21-day cycle. • Objective response rate was 70% (95% CI 47-87%); 9/23 patient shave ongoing response with 14-month median follow-up. • Further studies are in development exploring SG and EV alone or with pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) presents a bleak prognosis, with limited treatment options. NECTIN-4, an overexpressed protein in UC, has become a target for therapy. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) gained Food and Drug Administration approval for advanced UC treatment, but patient selection based on NECTIN-4 expression remains challenging. In the study under evaluation, Duan et al. introduced a novel PET/CT imaging approach using 68Ga-N188, a molecular probe, to visualize NECTIN-4 expression in UC. Their study encompassed preclinical evaluations and translational assessments in both healthy individuals and UC patients. Results demonstrated the potential of 68Ga-N188 in identifying NECTIN-4 expression in UC lesions. Additionally, the study utilized long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT, enhancing sensitivity and enabling dynamic studies for improved radiopharmaceutical evaluation. In summary, the study from Duan and colleagues introduces a promising molecular imaging technique that could aid in patient selection for EV therapy and the development of targeted drugs for UC. It also highlights the potential of LAFOV PET/CT in enhancing imaging precision and expanding future therapeutic possibilities for UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]