1. Efficacy and safety of modified tract dilation technique using simultaneous pulling of proximal and distal ends of a guidewire for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in modified supine position
- Author
-
Jae-Wook Chung, Dong Jin Park, Bum Soo Kim, Yun-Sok Ha, So Young Chun, Heon Tak Ha, Jun Nyung Lee, and Tae Gyun Kwon
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Supine position ,Percutaneous ,Urology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous ,lcsh:RC870-923 ,nephrolithotomy ,Patient Positioning ,03 medical and health sciences ,kidney calculi ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Supine Position ,Humans ,Percutaneous nephrolithotomy ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,nephrostomy ,business.industry ,Balloon catheter ,Middle Aged ,lcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,Dilatation ,Confidence interval ,Surgery ,Prone position ,Urethra ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,percutaneous ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Nephrostomy ,Endourology/Urolithiasis ,Original Article ,Female ,business - Abstract
Purpose Recently, the needs for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have become more increased because of an easy approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. However, making a nephrostomy tract during supine PCNL is more difficult than prone position due to movable kidney. To overcome this limitation, we used a modified nephrostomy tract dilation (MTD) technique using guidewire traction. Materials and Methods From January 2014 to June 2019, a total of 259 patients underwent PCNL in the modified supine position. Among them, the MTD technique was performed in 171 patients. For the MTD technique, two hydrophilic guidewires were passed from the nephrostomy tract and brought out through the urethra, then both proximal and distal ends were contralaterally pulled with tension for the easy placement of a fascia-cutting needle and a balloon catheter. We analyzed the efficacy of this technique in comparison with the conventional method. Results Intraoperative radiation exposure time (RET) (68.87 vs. 212.11 s) and hospital stay (5.90 vs. 6.74 days) were significantly shorter, while the success rate (77.2% vs. 63.6%) was significantly higher in the MTD group. Multivariate analysis showed that only the maximal stone diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.928; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.314–2.828; p=0.001) and MTD technique (OR, 0.017; 95% CI, 0.007–0.040; p, Graphical Abstract
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF