Search

Cancer patients can experience flares of pain, called breakthrough pain (BTcP), despite treatment with painkillers. Although BTcP can be excruciating, its intensity and other characteristics depend on several factors, including its treatment. However, even if treated, BTcP can impair quality of life for cancer patients. We assessed quality of life in 118 patients with advanced cancer and BTcP treated in 13 medical oncology departments across Spain. We treated BTcP with individualized therapy, taking into account both pain-related and patient-related factors. We also measured quality of life using a specific, widely-used questionnaire at the study visits: at onset of individualized pain therapy and after 3, 15 and 30 days’ treatment. At each visit, flare-up pain therapy was adjusted or maintained as necessary. Throughout the study, quality of life and sleep quality improved for all participants. Furthermore, there was a greater reduction in intensity, duration and frequency of BTcP. The most common treatments for flare-ups were low doses of rapid-onset opioids (fentanyl given by sublingual, buccal or nasal administration), which were much better tolerated than high-dose opioids. Overall, the study showed that quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and BTcP increased after individualized pain therapy, mainly with low doses of rapid-onset opioids.

Bone metastasis is the most common cause of cancer-related pain, and metastatic bone pain (MBP) is not only severe but also progressive in many patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between pain management and performance status in patients with metastatic bone cancer in the Spanish clinical setting. A 3-month follow-up prospective, epidemiologic, multicenter study was conducted in 579 patients to assess the evolution of their performance, the impact of pain control on sleep and functionality, and the degree of pain control according to analgesic treatment. In patients with MBP, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (1.5 ± 0.7–1.3 ± 0.7 and 1.3 ± 0.8; p

In the last 10 years, there has been a major change in the treatment of lung cancer (LC). The discovery of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in some histological subtypes of LC and its sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has represented a substantial advance in the treatment of this entity. Until then, the only available option to treat this type of tumour was based on chemotherapy, with a small but significant benefit in terms of survival and quality of life. The arrival of new agents that act against activating EGFR mutations gave rise to the era of precision medicine with targeted therapies able to act on the origin of the tumour, thus providing a therapeutic benefit while minimizing adverse effects and delaying administration of chemotherapy. In addition, this has produced a change in the diagnostic paradigm of lung cancer (as well as in that of all tumours), with a shift from a purely histological diagnosis to a classification of tumours based on their mutational characteristics. This shift has been made possible by the development of technologies allowing complex DNA analysis. Together with the efforts of researchers from all over the world, these techniques allow continued discovery of genetic alterations that could be the target of new drugs as well as definition of the mechanisms of activity and resistance to treatments. This extraordinary development of targeted therapies cannot change the fact that metastatic lung cancer continues to be an incurable disease and, at the present time, only a few patients will benefit from targeted therapies. Ongoing research will shed new light on the molecular alterations that give rise to LC and will provide new treatment alternatives for this disease.

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved rapidly over the last years, from the era of immunological therapies to targeted agents. New drugs, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), as well as previous immunological therapies, are associated with important toxicity, which may require a physician with experience in the treatment of these side effects. Proper management of these adverse effects (AEs) is essential to ensure the optimal therapeutic dosage and improve patient outcomes, including enhanced survival and quality of life.