Search

Background The Barthel Index, originally developed and validated to assess activities of daily living in patients with neuromuscular disorders, is commonly used in research and clinical practice involving critically ill patients. Objectives To evaluate the internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and construct validity of the Barthel Index used at intensive care unit discharge. Methods In this observational study, 2 physiotherapists measured the physical functioning of 122 patients at intensive care unit discharge, using the Barthel Index and other measurement instruments. Results The patients had a median (IQR) age of 56 (47-66) years, and 62 patients (51%) were male. The primary reason for intensive care unit admission was sepsis (28 patients [23%]), and 83 patients (68%) were receiving mechanical ventilation. The Cronbach α value indicating internal consistency was 0.81. For interrater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98; P < .001) and the κ statistic for the individual items was 0.54 to 0.94. The standard error of measurement was 7.22, the smallest detectable change was 20.01, and the 95% limits of agreement were –10.3 and 11.8. The Barthel Index showed moderate to high correlations with the other physical functioning measurement instruments (ρ = 0.57 to 0.88; P < .001 for all). Conclusion The Barthel Index is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing physical functioning at intensive care unit discharge.

RESUMO Objetivo: Traduzir, adaptar transculturalmente para o português do Brasil o instrumento Early Rehabilitation Index e validar para uso na unidade de terapia intensiva o instrumento Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index, para avaliação do estado funcional. Métodos: Foram executadas as seguintes etapas: preparação, tradução, reconciliação, tradução reversa, revisão, harmonização, pré-teste e avaliação psicométrica. Após esse processo inicial, a versão em português foi aplicada por dois avaliadores em pacientes que permaneciam pelo menos 48 horas internados na unidade de terapia intensiva. Verificou-se a confiabilidade da escala por meio da consistência interna, da confiabilidade entre avaliadores e do efeito piso e teto. Para a validade de constructo, correlacionou-se o Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index com instrumentos que usualmente são utilizados para avaliação do estado funcional na unidade de terapia intensiva. Resultados: Participaram 122 pacientes com mediana de idade de 56 [46,8 - 66] anos. O Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index teve confiabilidade adequada com coeficiente alfa de Cronbach de 0,65. A confiabilidade entre avaliadores foi excelente, com coeficiente de correlação intraclasse de 0,94 (IC95% 0,92 - 0,96) e moderado a excelente com índice de concordância de kappa de 0,54 a 1,0. Os efeitos piso e teto foram mínimos. Observou-se a validade do Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index por meio das correlações com o escore total do Perme Escore (rô = 0,72), da Escala de Estado Funcional em UTI (rô = 0,77), do Physical Function in Intensive Care Test-score (rô = 0,69), do Medical Research Council sum score (rô = 0,58), além das dinamometrias de preensão palmar (rô = 0,58) e manual de coxa (rô = 0,55), todos com p < 0,001. Conclusão: A versão adaptada do Early Rehabilitation Index para o português brasileiro e na sua totalidade, Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index é confiável e válida para avaliação do estado funcional dos pacientes na alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. ABSTRACT Objective: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Early Rehabilitation Index to Brazilian Portuguese and validate the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index for use in the intensive care unit to assess functional status. Methods: The following steps were performed: preparation, translation, reconciliation, back-translation, revision, harmonization, pretesting, and psychometric evaluation. After this initial process, the Portuguese version was applied by two evaluators to patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 48 hours. The reliability of the scale was assessed by internal consistency, interrater reliability, and floor and ceiling effects. To measure construct validity, the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index was correlated with instruments typically used to assess functional status in the intensive care unit. Results: A total of 122 patients with a median age of 56 (46.8 - 66) years participated in the study. The Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index had adequate reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.65. The interrater reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95%CI 0.92 - 0.96), and agreement was moderate to excellent, with a kappa agreement index of 0.54 to 1.0. The floor and ceiling effects were minimal. The validity of the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index was observed through its correlations with the total Perme score (rho = 0.72), the Functional Status Score for the ICU (rho = 0.77), the Physical Function in the Intensive Care Test score (rho = 0.69), and the Medical Research Council sum score (rho = 0.58), in addition to handgrip strength (rho = 0.58) and knee extensor strength measured by hand-held dynamometry (rho = 0.55), all with p < 0.001. Conclusion: The adapted versions of the Early Rehabilitation Index for Brazilian Portuguese and, in its entirety, the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index are reliable and valid for assessing the functional status of patients at discharge from the intensive care unit.

Persistent inflammation in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors is associated with higher long-term mortality and poorer mobility. However, it is unknown if inflammatory markers are associated with other dysfunctions observed in survivors of critical illness. Thus, it was investigated if plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 at hospital discharge were associated with long-term functional and cognitive performance after ICU discharge. Adult patients admitted for > 48 h to a 20-bed mixed ICU in a University Hospital had blood collected within 48 h before hospital discharge to measure IL-6 and IL-10 levels. After a median time of 48 months, cognitive status was determined by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and functional status was determined by the Barthel Index. Patients at the higher 25th percentile of both IL-6 and IL-10 had a worse long-term cognitive performance, but not worse functional status, even when adjusted for confounders after long-term follow-up. In conclusion, elevated circulating IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations at hospital discharge were associated with long-term cognitive dysfunction in ICU survivors.