Jordan W. Tappero, Thanyanan Chaowanachan, Orapin Suksripanich, William C. Levine, Thomas J. Spira, Natthaga Sakulploy, Punneeporn Wasinrapee, Egarit Noulsri, Vallerut Pobkeeree, Sombat Thanprasertsuk, Surada Lerdwana, and Kovit Pattanapanyasat
The advent of potent antiretroviral therapy in 1996 led to a revolution in the care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or AIDS. In countries such as Thailand, where antiretroviral drug therapy is now available due to the introduction of generic drugs, the provision of affordable and reliable CD4 testing for the initiation and monitoring of antiretroviral therapy has emerged as a vital issue. In Thailand, dual-platform (DP) flow cytometry immunophenotyping is the accepted standard method for the determination of the absolute counts of CD4+ T lymphocytes (6). The DP technique uses a flow cytometer (FCM), along with a hematology analyzer, which provides the absolute lymphocyte count, to provide the percentage of CD4+ T lymphocytes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended three-tube, three-color monoclonal antibody panel with the lyse-and-wash or lyse-no-wash whole-blood method (6, 7) is commonly used in most regional hospitals. However, there are two main drawbacks of such a method: (i) many studies have highlighted problems associated with the DP-derived CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, especially in relation to the generation of an absolute lymphocyte count by the hematology analyzer (1, 3, 11, 16, 23); and (ii) the cost of DP FCM CD4 testing in Thailand remains relatively high ($12 to $20). Several single-platform (SP) flow cytometric technologies, including FCM volumetric counting and microfluorometry (8, 9, 13, 14, 19), as well as, most commonly, the bead-based flow cytometric method for measurement of the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, have been developed and successfully evaluated (21, 25). Although this bead-based flow cytometric method eliminates the need for multiple technologies, it is still limited by the high cost of the currently available FCMs and fluorescent beads. Although alternative nonflow cytometric technologies are simple and less expensive, they have not been implemented widely due to their complexity, low-volume CD4 counting application (1 to 10 samples/day), and poor quality control (4, 5, 12, 22). The recent introduction of the inexpensive single-parameter CyFlowgreen FCM (Partec GmbH, Munster, Germany), which uses a single phycoerythrin (PE) conjugated-monoclonal antibody to CD4, has increased access to CD4+ count determinations for patients in areas that are not equipped with an FCM, particularly in district hospitals in the rural areas of Thailand. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this single-parameter SP CyFlowgreen technology as an alternative for determination of absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts by comparing the values obtained with CyFlowgreen with those obtained by the standard SP bead-based systems, consisting of TruCOUNT tubes (Becton Dickinson Biosciences [BDB], San Jose, CA) with the FACScan (BDB) system and the FACSCount FCM (BDB). This study was done as part of the CDC Global AIDS Program, which supports the evaluation of alternative methodologies for CD4+ T-lymphocyte subset enumeration.