Search

Purpose: International guidelines recommend urethral dose volume constraints to minimize the risk of urinary toxicity after prostate brachytherapy. An association between dose to the bladder neck (BN) and toxicity has previously been reported, and we sought to evaluate the impact of this organ at risk on urinary toxicity, based on intra-operative contouring., Material and Methods: Rates of acute and late urinary toxicity (AUT and LUT, respectively) were graded according to CTCAE version 5.0 for 209 consecutive patients who underwent low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy monotherapy, with approximately equal numbers treated before and after we began routinely contouring the BN. AUT and LUT were compared in patients treated before and after we began contouring the OAR, and also for those treated after we began contouring who had a D 2cc of greater than or less than 50% prescription dose., Results: AUT and LUT fell after intra-operative BN contouring was instituted. Rates of grade ≥ 2 AUT fell from 15/101 (15%) to 9/104 (8.6%), p = 0.245. Grade ≥ 2 LUT decreased from 32/100 (32%) to 18/100 (18%), p = 0.034. Grade ≥ 2 AUT was observed in 4/63 (6.3%) and 5/34 (15%) of those with a BN D 2cc >/≤ 50%, respectively, of prescription dose. Corresponding rates for LUT were 11/62 (18%) and 5/32 (16%)., Conclusions: There were lower urinary toxicity rates for patients treated after we commenced routine intra-operative contouring of the BN. No clear relationship was observed between dosimetry and toxicity in our population., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Termedia.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of primary re-irradiation for MSCC are not known. Our aim was to establish the efficacy and safety of biologically effective dose-based re-irradiation., Methods: Patients presenting with MSCC at a previously irradiated spine segment, and not proceeding with surgical decompression, were eligible. A 3 Gray per fraction experimental schedule (minimum 18 Gy/6 fractions, maximum 30 Gy/10 fractions) was used, delivering a maximum cumulative spinal dose of 100 Gy 2 if the interval since the last radiotherapy was within 6 months, or 130 Gy 2 if longer. The primary outcome was a change in mobility from week 1 to week 5 post-treatment, as assessed by the Tomita score. The RTOG SOMA score was used to screen for spinal toxicity, and an MRI performed to assess for radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM)., Results: Twenty-two patients were enroled, of whom eleven were evaluable for the primary outcome. Nine of eleven (81.8%) had stable or improved Tomita scores at 5 weeks. One of eight (12.5%) evaluable for late toxicity developed RIM., Conclusions: Re-irradiation is an efficacious treatment for MSCC. There is a risk of RIM with a cumulative dose of 120 Gy 2 ., Clinical Trial Registration: Cancer Trials Ireland (ICORG 07-11); NCT00974168., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Randomised trials have investigated various androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification strategies in men receiving radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. This individual patient data meta-analysis of relevant randomised trials aimed to quantify the benefit of these interventions in aggregate and in clinically relevant subgroups., Methods: For this meta-analysis, we performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, trial registries, the Web of Science, Scopus, and conference proceedings to identify trials with results published in English between Jan 1, 1962, and Dec 30, 2020. Multicentre randomised trials were eligible if they evaluated the use or prolongation of ADT (or both) in men with localised prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy, reported or collected distant metastasis and survival data, and used ADT for a protocol-defined finite duration. The Meta-Analysis of Randomized trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium was accessed to obtain individual patient data from randomised trials. The primary outcome was metastasis-free survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained through stratified Cox models for ADT use (radiotherapy alone vs radiotherapy plus ADT), neoadjuvant ADT extension (ie, extension of total ADT duration in the neoadjuvant setting from 3-4 months to 6-9 months), and adjuvant ADT prolongation (ie, prolongation of total ADT duration in the adjuvant setting from 4-6 months to 18-36 months). Formal interaction tests between interventions and metastasis-free survival were done for prespecified subgroups defined by age, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group, and radiotherapy dose. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021236855., Findings: Our search returned 12 eligible trials that provided individual patient data (10 853 patients) with a median follow-up of 11·4 years (IQR 9·0-15·0). The addition of ADT to radiotherapy significantly improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0·83 [95% CI 0·77-0·89], p<0·0001), as did adjuvant ADT prolongation (0·84 [0·78-0·91], p<0·0001), but neoadjuvant ADT extension did not (0·95 [0·83-1·09], p=0·50). Treatment effects were similar irrespective of radiotherapy dose, patient age, or NCCN risk group., Interpretation: Our findings provide the strongest level of evidence so far to the magnitude of the benefit of ADT treatment intensification with radiotherapy for men with localised prostate cancer. Adding ADT and prolonging the portion of ADT that follows radiotherapy is associated with improved metastasis-free survival in men, regardless of risk group, age, and radiotherapy dose delivered; however, the magnitude of the benefit could vary and shared decision making with patients is recommended., Funding: University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AUK reports personal fees from Varian Medical Systems, ViewRay, and Intelligent Automation; and research support from ViewRay, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, all outside the submitted work. FYF reports a consulting or advisory role for Astellas, Bayer, BlueEarth Diagnostics, Celgene, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, Myovant, Ryovant, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exact Sciences, Varian, Bluestar Genomics, and Serimmun; and research funding from Zenth Epigenetics. AN reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. LS reports personal fees from Sanofi Canada and Varian Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. JAE reports personal fees from Blue Earth, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Taris Biomedical, Merck, Roviant Pharma, and Myovant Sciences. HMS is a member of a clinical trial steering committee for Janssen and reports stock from Radiogel for an inactive role on medical advisory board, all outside of the submitted work. MBR reports personal fees from Amgen, Clovis, Janssen, Bayer, and Abrx; and research support from Janssen and Merck, outside the submitted work. NGN reports research funding from Janssen, Lantheus, and Bayer; and consulting fees from Oncolinea. DES declares personal fees from Janssen, AstraZeneca, and BlueEarth, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We assessed management of patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer, referred for radiotherapy to the rectum, who were candidates for short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and chemotherapy, followed by resection of all disease. We assessed surgical outcomes, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Methods: Retrospective review of patients meeting criteria: (i) treatment with SCRT to rectum; (ii) locally advanced primary rectal cancer; and (iii) resectable distant metastases at diagnosis. Data were collected from charts, correspondence and electronic patient records. OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 48 patients with stage IV rectal cancer at diagnosis were treated with SCRT. Only 15 patients (31%) had resectable metastatic disease and were intended for SCRT (25 Gy/5#), then chemotherapy, followed by resection of all sites of disease and are included in our study. 12 of the 15 surgical candidates (80%) had rectal surgery as planned, and 11 of the 15 (73%) had resection of the rectal primary and all metastatic disease. One patient had a pathological complete response (pCR), and 50% of surgical patients had a Mandard TRG of 1 or 2. Median PFS and OS for the 15 surgical candidates were 12.6 and 25.2 months, respectively, with a median FU of 21.2 months., Conclusion: For this cohort of patients, our treatment paradigm is pragmatic and results in excellent pathological response. However, the effectiveness of this approach should be the subject of future prospective studies., (© 2021 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.)

Objective: It has been established that survival and toxicity outcomes in some cancer types could be influenced by haemoglobin (Hb) levels. This study aims to determine if pre-treatment Hb is associated with late toxicity or survival outcomes in prostate cancer., Methods: Data from one Phase III randomised controlled trial and one single arm translational trial were analysed. Patients had localized prostate cancer and received ≥70 Gy radiotherapy and neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation between 1997 and 2013., Results: 302 males were included. Median follow-up was 6.8 years for toxicity and 10.3 years for survival outcomes. Patients with Hb below the reference range were more likely to experience Grade 2-3 late gastrointestinal toxicity than patients with Hb within the range ( p = 0.050). Neither late genitourinary toxicity, erectile function toxicity, prostate-specific antigen relapse free survival nor overall survival of patients were statistically significantly different between groups., Conclusion: Anaemia in prostate cancer is found in the minority of patients and is usually mild. Prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy with low Hb were more likely to experience Grade 2-3 late gastrointestinal toxicity., Advances in Knowledge: This study is one of the first in the published literature to investigate the role of Hb in prostate cancer toxicity and survival. We have found an association between Hb below the reference range and late GI toxicity. Consideration should be given to further investigating patients with iron deficiency anaemia to guide management options and outrule underlying GI pathology before proceeding with radiotherapy treatment.

Background: The optimal EBRT schedule for MSCC is undetermined. Our aim was to determine whether a single fraction (SF) was non-inferior to five daily fractions (5Fx), for functional motor outcome., Methods: Patients not proceeding with surgical decompression in this multicentre non-inferiority, Phase 3 trial were randomised to 10 Gy/SF or 20 Gy/5Fx. A change in mobility from baseline to 5 weeks for each patient, was evaluated by a Modified Tomita score: 1 = 'Walk unaided', 2 = 'With walking aid' and 3 = 'Bed-bound'. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was a detrimental change of -0.4 in the mean difference between arms., Results: One-hundred and twelve eligible patients were enrolled. Seventy-three patients aged 30-87 were evaluated for the primary analysis. The 95% CI for the difference in the mean change in mobility scores between arms was -0.12 to 0.6. Since -0.4 is not included in the interval, there is evidence that 10 Gy/SF is non-inferior to 20 Gy/5Fx. One grade 3 AE was reported in the 5Fx arm. Twelve (26%) patients in the 5Fx arm had a Grade 2-3 AE compared with six (11%) patients in the SF arm (p = 0.093)., Conclusion: For mobility preservation, one 10-Gy fraction is non-inferior to 20 Gy in five fractions, in patients with MSCC not proceeding with surgical decompression., Clinical Trial Registration: Cancer Trials Ireland ICORG 05-03; NCT00968643; EU-20952.

Objective:: The aim of this study is to investigate if a handheld ultrasound device (BladderScan® BVI 6100) can accurately measure bladder volumes in prostate radiotherapy (RT) patients., Methods:: A comparison was made of contoured bladder volumes based on treatment planning CT (TPCT) and BladderScan® BVI 6100 ultrasound device in a large prostate RT population. Three bladder volume (BV) measurements were taken using the bladder volume instrument (BVI) device on prostate RT patients immediately prior to TPCT (n = 190). The CT delineation bladder volumes were also recorded. The mean of the three BVI readings (BVI mean ) and the maximum (BVI max ) of the readings were considered for a comparative analysis., Results:: There was a strong positive correlation between the BVI and CT delineated bladder volumes (BVI mean r = 0.825; BVI max r = 0.830). The mean difference [± standard deviation (SD)] was an underestimation of BV for both BVI mean and BVI max (44.8 ± 88.2 ml and 32.9 ± 87.5 ml, respectively)., Conclusion:: This is the largest study to date (n = 190), assessing the accuracy of the BladderScan® BVI 6100 in the prostate RT population. The BVI 6100 provides an acceptable indication of BV for use in prostate RT patients for the purposes of monitoring BV., Advances in Knowledge:: The BladderScan® BVI 6100 provides a convenient and non-irradiating method of indicating BV for use in prostate RT patients.

Aims: The objective of this phase II clinical trial was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of accelerated hypofractionated three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in localised non-resectable/non-operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with stage I-III NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective single-arm All Ireland Co-operative Oncology Research Group (ICORG 99-09) toxicity end point phase II trial. The protocol allocated patients between three radiation schedule dose levels (60, 66 or 72 Gy, in 20, 22 and 24 fractions, respectively, 3 Gy daily, five fractions per week) according to combined lung V 25Gy (V 25Gy  ≤ 30%) with built-in early stopping toxicity rules. The primary end point was toxicity with evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity. The secondary objectives included radiological tumour response rate at 3 months after the completion of radiation therapy and the thoracic progression-free survival time., Results: Sixty patients were recruited from August 1999 to June 2009. Forty-nine patients were included in the primary per-protocol analysis. Eleven patients were not evaluable. In the first 30 evaluable patient cohort, severe oesophageal toxicity was reported in two patients (2/49; 4% experiencing grade 5 oesophageal late toxicity, related to the 97% oesophageal length). The trial was temporarily closed and was then reopened to validate an oesophageal dose volume constraint (DVC) of limiting the length of oesophagus fully encompassed by the 97% isodose to less than 1 cm (applied to 21 patients). The trial prospectively showed the safety of the oesophageal DVC, with no oesophageal toxicity above grade 3 thereafter. Thirty-nine per cent of patients had disease progression at 3-4 months after radiotherapy, 22% had stable disease, 20% had a complete response and 14% had a partial response. The median overall survival was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval 10.5-16.7) and overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 57% and 29%, respectively., Conclusion: A strategy using accelerated hypofractionated 3DCRT is feasible and reasonably safe for patients with inoperable NSCLC. It is safe to deliver for centrally located tumours if DVCs are applied to the oesophagus, which is the primary dose-limiting toxicity. Further studies are required to assess the efficacy of hypofractionated regimens for centrally located tumours using an oesophageal DVC and monitoring for oesophageal toxicity., (Copyright © 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To assess the temporal patterns of late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) radiotherapy toxicity and resolution rates in a randomised controlled trial (All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group 97-01) assessing duration of neo-adjuvant (NA) hormone therapy for localised prostate cancer., Material and Methods: Node negative patients with > 1 of: PSA > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 7, and stage T3 or more, were included. Follow-up, including toxicity assessment, was three-monthly in the early stages and yearly thereafter., Results: Median follow-up from the end of RT was 6.8 years. In the interval between 90 days following the end of RT and the last toxicity assessment, GI and GU toxicity (any grade) was found in 50% and 51% of 240 and 241 patients, respectively. For those who did develop toxicity, the median time from end of RT until the first development of any grade GI or GU toxicity was 1.2 years and 1.6 years, respectively, whilst median time to final resolution was 1.6 years and 2.2 years, respectively. Grade 2 (G2) or greater GI and GU toxicity occurred in 29 (12.1%) and 40 (16.6%) patients, respectively. The proportion with unresolved G2 + GI and GU toxicity was 89% and 79%, respectively, in year 1, 69% and 65% in year 2, 59% and 52% in year 3 and 27% and 32% in year 5., Conclusion: Long-term toxicities continue to occur many years after NA hormone therapy and RT. The rate of occurrence does not appear to reduce within the time frame during which our patients were followed. The percentage of patients suffering from G2 + toxicity at any time is however low. Resolution of these toxicities continues for the duration of the follow-up.

Purpose: Organ motion is a contributory factor to the variation in location of the prostate and organs at risk during a course of fractionated prostate radiation therapy (RT). A prospective randomized controlled trial was designed with the primary endpoint to provide evidence-based bladder-filling instructions to achieve a consistent bladder volume (BV) and thus reduce the bladder-related organ motion. The secondary endpoints were to assess the incidence of acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for patients and patients' satisfaction with the bladder-filling instructions., Methods and Materials: One hundred ten patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 bladder-filling protocols; 540 mL (3 cups) of water or 1080 mL (6 cups) of water, in a single institution trial. A portable ultrasound device, BladderScan BVI 6400 (Verathon Inc, Bothell, WA), measured BVs at treatment planning computed tomography (TPCT) scan and 3 times per week during RT. Maximum bladder dose and BV receiving ≥ 50, 60, and 70 Gy were recorded. Acute and late GU and GI toxicity were evaluated, as were patients' comfort, perception of urinary symptoms, and quality of life (QoL)., Results: There was significantly less BV variation in the 540 mL arm when compared with 1080 mL (median: 76 mL vs 105 mL, P = .003). Larger BVs on initial TPCT correlated with larger BV variations during RT (P < .0005). There were no statistically significant associations between arm and GU/GI toxicity, dose median comfort scores, or median QoL scores., Conclusions: The 540 mL bladder-filling arm resulted in reproducible BVs throughout a course of RT, without any deterioration in QoL or increase in toxicities for prostate patients., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Erectile dysfunction is a common consequence of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. The addition of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation (NAD) has an indeterminate additive effect. We examined the long-term effect on erectile function (EF) of two durations (4 months: arm 1 and 8 months: arm 2) of NAD prior to radiation (RT) for patients with localised prostate cancer from the Irish Clinical Oncology Research Group (ICORG 97-01) 4- versus 8-month trial. In this study we aimed to (1) analyse the overall effect on EF of NAD in an EBRT population, (2) compare the probability of retained EF over time in an EBRT population treated with either 4 or 8 months of NAD and (3) identify any variables such as risk group and age which may have an additive detrimental effect. This analysis provides unique long term follow up data., Materials and Methods: From 1997 to 2001, 276 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were randomised to 4 or 8 months of NAD before RT. EF data were recorded at baseline and at each follow-up visit by physician directed questions, using a 4-point grading system., Results: Two hundred and thirty patients were included in the analysis of EF and were followed for a median of 80 months. One hundred and forty-one patients had EF at baseline. Neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation in addition to radiation therapy caused a significant reduction in EF. The most significant reduction in EF happens within the first year. The median time to grade 3-4 EF toxicity was 14.6 months, 17.6 months in arm 1 and 13.7 in arm 2. Freedom from late EF toxicity did not differ significantly between arms, overall or at 5 years (n=141). The cumulative probability of EF preservation at 5 years was 28% (22-34) in arm 1 and 24% (19-30) in arm 2. Age was a significant predictor of post-treatment EF., Conclusions: The first year post ADT and EBRT poses the greatest risk to sexual function and a continued decline may be expected. However, 26% of men can expect to retain sexual function at 5 years., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the long-term outcomes of a randomized trial comparing short (4 months; Arm 1) and long (8 months; Arm 2) neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer., Methods and Materials: Between 1997 and 2001, 276 patients were enrolled and the data from 261 were analyzed. The stratification risk factors were prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score≥7, and Stage T3 or more. The intermediate-risk stratum had one factor and the high-risk stratum had two or more. Staging was done from the bone scan and computed tomography findings. The primary endpoint was biochemical failure-free survival., Results: The median follow-up was 102 months. The overall survival, biochemical failure-free survival. and prostate cancer-specific survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms, overall or at 5 years. The cumulative probability of overall survival at 5 years was 90% (range, 87-92%) in Arm 1 and 83% (range, 80-86%) in Arm 2. The biochemical failure-free survival rate at 5 years was 66% (range, 62-71%) in Arm 1 and 63% (range, 58-67%) in Arm 2., Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was found in biochemical failure-free survival between 4 months and 8 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyse the pattern of survival for patients diagnosed with AIDS in Dublin., Methods: Data on 193 patients visiting the Department of Genitourinary Medicine of a Dublin Hospital, over a period of 7 years with AIDS, were analysed, and survival patterns were investigated., Results: The cumulative probability of survival for the cohort was 69.0 +/- 3.3% at 1 year and 6.5 +/- 2.5% at 5 years. Median survival was 576 days. Year of diagnosis and disease group to which the patient belonged at diagnosis had a significant influence on the survival of the cohort (P < 0.0006 and P < 0.02, respectively). Age group, disease group, and year of diagnosis showed significant differences between strata (P < 0.01, P < 0.002, and P < 0.04, respectively). Patients aged 35-39 years showed longer median survival times (715 days) than all other age groups (median survival = 547 days; P < 0.04). Patients whose disease group at diagnosis was opportunistic disease(s) alone (Centers for Disease Control 1987 criteria, stage IV group C1) had a significantly longer median survival (672 days) than all others (median survival 281 days; P < 0.0002). Survival did not differ significantly by sex or risk group alone, nor did it differ significantly by manifestation of disease when grouped according to recognised criteria. Treatment with antiretroviral therapy had a significant influence on the survival of the cohort (P < 0.0002), and the treatment group showed a significant difference between strata (P < 0.0002). This result must be qualified by the fact that, first, 11 of the 26 patients not receiving therapy died within 1 month of diagnosis and people who survived longer had a greater chance of beginning treatment, and that, secondly, criteria for antiretroviral therapy allocation were not entirely clear., Conclusions: The overall survival time found by this study is comparable to that found in other studies in developed countries of the survival of persons with AIDS. Patterns of survival for age groups and manifestation of disease show some contrasting features, mainly owing to the demographic profile of the patients and the high proportion of intravenous drug users.