Search

Current guidelines recommend the perioperative continuation of aspirin in patients with coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, supporting evidence is limited. This study aimed to compare continuing aspirin monotherapy vs temporarily holding all antiplatelet therapy before noncardiac surgery in patients with previous DES implantation. We randomly assigned patients who had received a DES >1 year previously and were undergoing elective noncardiac surgery either to continue aspirin or to discontinue all antiplatelet agents 5 days before noncardiac surgery. Antiplatelet therapy was recommended to be resumed no later than 48 hours after surgery, unless contraindicated. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke between 5 days before and 30 days after noncardiac surgery. A total of 1,010 patients underwent randomization. Among 926 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (462 patients in aspirin monotherapy group and 464 patients in the no-antiplatelet therapy group), the primary composite outcome occurred in 3 patients (0.6%) in the aspirin monotherapy group and 4 patients (0.9%) in the no antiplatelet group (difference, −0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: −1.3 to 0.9; P > 0.99). There was no stent thrombosis in either group. The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between groups (6.5% vs 5.2%; P = 0.39), whereas minor bleeding was significantly more frequent in the aspirin group (14.9% vs 10.1%; P = 0.027). Among patients undergoing low-to-intermediate risk noncardiac surgery >1 year after stent implantation primarily with a DES, in the setting of lower-than-expected event rates, we failed to identify a significant difference between perioperative aspirin monotherapy and no antiplatelet therapy with respect to ischemic outcomes or major bleeding. (Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Drug-eluting Stent Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery [ASSURE-DES]; NCT02797548) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited evidence exists on the role of depression in the risk of developing stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We investigated this relationship with data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Methods: Our nationwide retrospective cohort study included 164,198 patients who had undergone PCI between 2010 and 2017. Depression was defined with the ICD‐10 codes recorded prior to the PCI. The primary outcome was a new‐onset stroke following the PCI. Secondary outcomes included PCI with myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting), and all‐cause mortality. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for potential confounders, including sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and MI at the index PCI. Results: Over a median follow‐up of 5.0 years, acute stroke occurred in 5.7% of patients with pre‐existing depression (17.4% of the study population), compared to 3.5% of those without depression. Depression was associated with a 27% increased risk of acute stroke (aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.20–1.35). Additionally, depression was linked with a 25% elevated risk of all‐cause death (aHR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.21–1.29) and an 8% increased risk of revascularization (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04–1.11). The associations with the risk of stroke and all‐cause mortality were stronger in patients under 65 years. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that pre‐existing depression may increase the risk of stroke and all‐cause mortality following PCI, particularly in patients under 65 years. Additionally, depression was significantly associated with an increased need for revascularization. This underscores the potential benefits of managing depression to reduce stroke risk and overall cardiovascular outcomes following PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A recent meta-analysis of randomized control trials demonstrated a significantly higher risk of major amputation in patients treated with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) compared with standard treatment, especially in high-dose paclitaxel-coated DCBs. Distal particulate embolization after DCB use was considered a potential cause of the higher incidence of major amputation. The current study aimed to histologically and biologically compare biologic drug effect and distal particulate embolization in 3 DCBs (a high-dose paclitaxel-coated DCB [IN.PACT Admiral] and 2 low-dose paclitaxel-coated DCBs [Ranger and Lutonix]). Methods and Results: The DCBs were inflated in the healthy descending aortas of 18 rabbits, followed by euthanasia 28 days after the procedure. The treated descending aorta and distal skeletal muscles were histopathologically evaluated, and paclitaxel concentrations were measured. The paclitaxel concentration of the treated lesion was highest for Ranger, followed by IN.PACT and Lutonix (Ranger vs IN.PACT vs Lutonix: 1089 [745–2170] pmol/mg vs 638 [160–2075] pmol/mg vs 25 [10–304] pmol/mg, respectively; p<0.0001). In the histopathological evaluation, the angle of severe medial smooth muscle cell loss was largest for Ranger followed by IN.PACT and Lutonix (12.8 [8.0–20.4] degree vs 1.4 [1.2–5.2] degree vs 0.8 [0.5–2.5] degree, respectively), with significant differences for Ranger vs IN.PACT (p=0.007) and Ranger vs Lutonix (p=0.002). However, paclitaxel concentrations of distal skeletal muscles were lowest for Lutonix, followed by Ranger and IN.PACT (12 [1–58] pmol/mg vs 15 [13–21] pmol/mg vs 42 [19–108] pmol/mg, respectively, p<0.0001). The numbers of arteries with downstream DCB effects were highest for IN.PACT, followed by Ranger and Lutonix (Ranger vs IN.PACT vs Lutonix, 3 [3–4] vs 4 [3–7] vs 2 [1–2], respectively), which was consistent with the measured tissue paclitaxel concentrations. Conclusion: These findings suggest that Ranger demonstrates the strongest paclitaxel effect, as well as the second-best effect regarding distal particulate embolization, making it a good treatment option for patients with peripheral artery disease among the 3 DCBs evaluated in the current study. Further clinical head-to-head comparisons with larger numbers of patients are needed to explore which DCB is the most effective and safe treatment option.Clinical Impact: The findings of the current preclinical study suggests that Ranger demonstrates the strongest paclitaxel effect, as well as the second-best effect regarding distal particulate embolization making it a good treatment for patients with intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) has been recognized as a novel and practical marker for the assessment of cardiometabolic risk, but the relevance of AIP as a prognostic biomarker in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains debated. This study investigated the association between AIP and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in CAD patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods: A total of 2,250 patients undergoing PCI with DES were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was MACCEs, encompassing acute myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and all-cause mortality. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Restricted cubic splines were applied to explore the dose–response associations. And subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate potential relationship between AIP and MACCEs across different subgroups. Results: During a medium follow-up of 29.8 (25.6–34.0) months, 106 (4.7%) patients experienced TVR. After adjusting for confounders, AIP (per 1 SD increase) was positively associated with TVR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.58, P = 0.042). In females, there was a significant association (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.40–3.98, P = 0.002), but no significant association was observed in males. There was an interaction between AIP and gender (P = 0.017). Restricted cubic spline analysis depicted a U-shaped relationship between AIP and TVR (P nonlinear = 0.016), with an elevated risk evident from an AIP of 0.20. Conclusion: AIP showed a U-shaped relationship with TVR in PCI patients with DES, particularly pronounced among females. We suggested that the AIP should be used as a plasma marker of key interest for preventing TVR after DES implantation in patients with CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Coronary artery disease is the most common form of cardiovascular disease. It is caused by excess plaque along the arterial wall, blocking blood flow to the heart (stenosis). A percutaneous coronary intervention widens the arterial wall with the inflation of a balloon inside the lesion area and leaves behind a metal stent to prevent re‐narrowing of the artery (restenosis). However, in‐stent restenosis may occur due to damage to the arterial wall tissue, triggering neointimal hyperplasia, producing fibrotic and calcified plaques and narrowing the artery again. Drug‐eluting stents, which slowly release medication to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia, are used to prevent in‐stent restenosis but fail up to 20% of cases. Coronary intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT), which uses β$\beta$‐emitting radionuclides to prevent in‐stent restenosis, is used in these failed cases to prevent in‐stent restenosis. However, current clinical dosimetry for IVBT is water‐based, and heterogeneities such as the guidewire of the IVBT device, fibrotic and calcified plaques and stents are not considered.This study aimed to develop a Monte Carlo‐based dose calculation software, accounting for patient‐specific geometry from Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images.RapidBrachyIVBT, a Monte Carlo dose calculation software based on the Geant4 toolkit v. 10.02.p02, was developed and integrated into RapidBrachyMCTPS, a treatment planning system for brachytherapy applications. The only commercially available IVBT delivery system, the Novoste Beta‐Cath 3.5F, with a 90Sr90Y$^{90}{\rm Sr}^{90}{\rm Y}$ source train, was modeled with 30, 40, and 60 mm source train lengths. The software was validated with published TG‐149 parameters compared to Monte Carlo simulations in water. The dose calculation engine was tested with OCT images from a patient undergoing coronary IVBT for recurrent in‐stent restenosis at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Considering the heterogeneities, the images were segmented and used to calculate the absorbed dose to water and the absorbed dose to medium. The prescribed dose was normalized to 23 Gy at 2.0 mm from the source center, which is the target volume in IVBT.The dose rate values in water obtained using RapidBrachyIVBT aligned with TG‐149 consensus values, showing agreement within a range of 0.03% to 1.7%. Considering the heterogeneities present in the patient's OCT images, the absorbed dose in the entire artery segment was up to 77.5% lower, while within the target volume, it was up to 56.6% lower, compared to the dose calculated in a homogeneous water phantom.RapidBrachyIVBT, a Monte Carlo dose calculation software for IVBT, was developed and successfully integrated into RapidBrachyMCTPS, a treatment planning system for brachytherapy applications, where accurate attenuation of the absorbed dose by heterogeneities is considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the limitations of using major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as the primary outcome measure in cardiovascular trials. It highlights the challenges of including multiple events of varying clinical relevance in a composite endpoint like MACE, which may mask the effects of more clinically relevant outcomes. The authors propose an alternative approach that includes death and quality of life in a hierarchical composite outcome to better reflect what patients desire from healthcare delivery. The article emphasizes the importance of assessing quality of life as a primary endpoint in cardiovascular trials to overcome the limitations of traditional MACE outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: This study aims to present the first comprehensive meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in treating intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis. Methods: A comprehensive examination was undertaken to compare the effectiveness and safety of DES and BMS in individuals experiencing symptomatic stenosis in the intracranial and vertebral arteries through an in-depth analysis of clinical research. We conducted an extensive search across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2024. The emphasis of our investigation was on various outcomes including rates of in-stent restenosis, symptomatic occurrences of in-stent restenosis, incidence of stroke, procedural success, mortality rates, complications associated with the procedure, and any adverse events. Results: Our analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1,243 patients (562 in the DES group and 681 in the BMS group). The findings demonstrated a significantly lower rate of in-stent restenosis in the DES group for both intracranial [odds ratio (OR): 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13 to 0.41; p < 0.00001] and vertebral artery stenosis (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.72; p = 0.003) compared to the BMS group. Additionally, the DES group showed a significantly reduced rate of postoperative strokes in vertebral artery stenosis cases (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.90; p = 0.03), with no significant differences noted in the intracranial artery stenosis comparison (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.95; p = 0.42). The study also revealed no significant disparities in symptomatic in-stent restenosis, procedural success, mortality, adverse effects, and perioperative complications between the two groups across the conditions studied. Conclusion: The comparison indicates that DES significantly reduces the risk of in-stent restenosis and postoperative strokes in patients with vertebral artery stenosis, compared to BMS. For both intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis, DES and BMS exhibit comparable safety profiles. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=439967. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study was conducted to address the lack of reports comparing the clinical outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and STEMI based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: A total of 9854 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health dataset were classified into three LVEF categories: heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF, n = 1250), HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, n = 2383), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, n = 6221). Each group was further divided into NSTEMI and STEMI groups. The primary clinical outcome was the incidence of patient-oriented composite outcomes, defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat coronary revascularization, hospitalization for HF, and stroke. Results: Following adjustment, in-hospital mortality rates were comparable between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups in the HFrEF and HFmrEF groups. However, 3-year mortality rates were higher in the NSTEMI group. In contrast, in the HFpEF group, the STEMI group had higher rates of in-hospital all-cause death (p = 0.001) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) compared to the NSTEMI group, which was associated with increased 3-year all-cause death (p = 0.026) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) in the STEMI group. When in-hospital mortality was excluded, no difference in 3-year mortality rates was observed between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups in the HFpEF group. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality and 3-year outcomes varied across LVEF groups. Therefore, comparing NSTEMI and STEMI based on LVEF provides valuable insights into the differences in patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Whether a conservative strategy of medical therapy alone or a strategy of medical therapy plus invasive treatment is more beneficial in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. METHODS We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial involving patients 75 years of age or older with NSTEMI at 48 sites in the United Kingdom. The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a conservative strategy of the best available medical therapy or an invasive strategy of coronary angiography and revascularization plus the best available medical therapy. Patients who were frail or had a high burden of coexisting conditions were eligible. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes (cardiovascular death) or nonfatal myocardial infarction assessed in a time-to-event analysis. RESULTS A total of 1518 patients underwent randomization; 753 patients were assigned to the invasive-strategy group and 765 to the conservative-strategy group. The mean age of the patients was 82 years, 45% were women, and 32% were frail. A primary-outcome event occurred in 193 patients (25.6%) in the invasive-strategy group and 201 patients (26.3%) in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.14; P = 0.53) over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Cardiovascular death occurred in 15.8% of the patients in the invasive-strategy group and 14.2% of the patients in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.44). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 11.7% in the invasive-strategy group and 15.0% in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99). Procedural complications occurred in less than 1% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS In older adults with NSTEMI, an invasive strategy did not result in a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (the composite primary outcome) than a conservative strategy over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation; BHF SENIOR-RITA ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN11343602.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims The question of when and how to treat truly asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function is still subject to debate and ongoing research. Here, the results of extended follow-up of the AVATAR trial are reported (NCT02436655, ClinicalTrials.gov). Methods The AVATAR trial randomly assigned patients with severe, asymptomatic AS and LV ejection fraction ≥ 50% to undergo either early surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or conservative treatment with watchful waiting strategy. All patients had negative exercise stress testing. The primary hypothesis was that early AVR will reduce a primary composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure (HF), as compared with conservative treatment strategy. Results A total of 157 low-risk patients (mean age 67 years, 57% men, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 1.7%) were randomly allocated to either the early AVR group (n = 78) or the conservative treatment group (n = 79). In an intention-to-treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 63 months, the primary composite endpoint outcome event occurred in 18/78 patients (23.1%) in the early surgery group and in 37/79 patients (46.8%) in the conservative treatment group [hazard ratio (HR) early surgery vs. conservative treatment 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.73, P =.002]. The Kaplan–Meier estimates for individual endpoints of all-cause death and HF hospitalization were significantly lower in the early surgery compared with the conservative group (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23–0.85, P =.012, for all-cause death and HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.73, P =.007, for HF hospitalizations). Conclusions The extended follow-up of the AVATAR trial demonstrates better clinical outcomes with early surgical AVR in truly asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LV ejection fraction compared with patients treated with conservative management on watchful waiting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are a major contributor to postoperative complications. This study employed a health equity lens to examine rates of postoperative MACE by race and ethnicity. This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study followed patients with and without pre-existing coronary artery stents from 2008 to 2018 who underwent non-cardiac surgery. MACE was the primary outcome (death, acute MI, repeated coronary revascularization, in-stent thrombosis) and self-reported race and ethnicity was the primary predictor. A propensity score model of a 1:1 cohort of non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients and all other racial and ethnic minority populations (Hispanic and Black) was used to compare the rate of perioperative MACE in this cohort. During the study period, 79,686 cases were included in the analytic sample; 950 patients (1.2 %) had pre-existing coronary artery stents. <1 % of patients experienced MACE within 30 days following non-cardiac surgery (0.8 %). After confounder adjustment and propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in MACE among racial and ethnic minority patients compared to NHW patients (OR = 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.48, 1.25). In our sensitivity analyses, stratifying by sex, there were no differences in MACE by race and ethnicity. The study found no statistically significant differences in MACE by race and ethnicity among patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery. Access to a high-volume, high-quality hospital such as the one studied may reduce the presence of healthcare disparities and may explain why our findings are not consistent with previous studies. • Major adverse cardiac events are major contributors to postoperative complications. • Stratifying quality measures by demographics is necessary to identify disparities. • There were no differences in major cardiac events by race and ethnicity. • Access to quality institutions may help reduce healthcare disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction A dilation and evacuation (D&E) is a safe and effective option for patients undergoing a second trimester abortion. Recent legislation and geographic restrictions threaten patients' access to this surgical procedure, prompting a call to action to strengthen abortion training. This quality improvement project aimed to assess if a standardized lecture and checklist would improve military trainee knowledge and comfort with performing D&Es. Materials and Methods Using society recommendations and incorporating available level I to III evidence, a standardized checklist for D&Es was created to include necessary equipment, procedural steps, perioperative considerations, and potential complications. The checklist and associated lecture were presented to gynecology residents from seven of the nine military training programs. Residents completed a six-question assessment regarding comfort and knowledge in performing D&Es prior to and following the intervention. Responses were ranked on a five-point Likert scale and analyzed with the Wilcoxon sign-rank test. This project was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board. The standard Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) methodology was used for ongoing assessment of the efficacy of this quality improvement project. Results There were 67 trainees that completed the pre-intervention assessment and 44 who completed it post-intervention, with 27 responses paired for statistical analysis. All trainees self-reported improved comfort and knowledge in all procedural aspects of D&Es, with the largest improvement observed in equipment knowledge (mean difference 1.44, P <0.001), performing procedural steps (mean difference 1.26, P <0.001), and managing complications (mean difference 1.33, P <0.001). Conclusions Use of an evidence-based checklist significantly improves resident knowledge and comfort with performing second trimester D&Es. In a post Dobbs environment, the military is an appropriate proxy for larger society and training programs need to develop alternatives and adjuncts to clinical training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide. In patients undergoing endovascular treatment for ICAS, in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with ischemic stroke recurrence. Objective: Intracranial drug-eluting self-expanding stent systems (COMETIU; Sinomed Neurovita Technology Inc., CHN) are new devices for treating ICAS. This study evaluated the perioperative experience and medium-term outcomes of COMETIU in 16 patients. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 16 patients with ICAS (≥ 70% stenosis) who underwent intravascular therapy between September 4, 2022, and February 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of ISR at 6 months postoperatively. The secondary efficacy outcomes were device and technical success rates. The secondary safety outcomes included stroke or death within 30 days after the procedure and the cumulative annual rate of recurrent ischemic stroke in the target-vessel territory from 31 days to 6 months and 1 year. Results: A total of 16 patients with 16 intracranial atherosclerotic lesions were treated with 16 COMETIUs. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia with 100% device and technical success rates, with no cases of periprocedural stroke or death. The mean radiographic follow-up duration was at least 6 months postoperatively, and all patients presented for radiographic and clinical follow-up. There were no reported ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes. Angiographic follow-up for all patients revealed no cases of ISR. Conclusion: COMETIU is safe and effective for treating ICAS, with minimal risk during the procedure and a low rate of ISR during medium-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persistent non-plateauing adverse event rates in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain a challenge. A bioadaptor is a novel implant that addresses this issue by restoring the haemodynamic modulation of the artery, allowing cyclic pulsatility, vasomotion, and adaptative remodelling, by unlocking and providing dynamic support to the artery. We aimed to assess outcomes with the device versus a contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) in a representative PCI population. INFINITY-SWEDEHEART is a single-blind, non-inferiority, registry-based, randomised controlled study conducted in 20 hospitals in Sweden. Patients aged 18–85 years, with chronic or acute coronary syndrome ischaemic heart disease, with an indication for PCI, with up to three de novo lesions suitable for implantation with one single device per lesion, and successful pre-dilatation were identified via the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry and eligible for enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using block randomisation with random variation in block size and stratified by site, to either the DynamX bioadaptor (Elixir Medical, Milpitas, CA, USA) or a zotarolimus-eluting DES (Resolute Onyx and Onyx Trustar, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The primary endpoint was the device-oriented clinical endpoint of target lesion failure at 12 months (a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation), assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment, regardless of treatment received) who had either experienced an event up to 12 months or completed the trial up to 12 months. Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the absolute risk difference was less than 4·2%. Powered secondary endpoints were landmark analyses from 6 months onwards for target lesion failure, target vessel failure (composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation), and target lesion failure for patients with acute coronary syndrome assessed in the ITT population). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04562805 , and follow-up to 5 years is ongoing. Between Sept 30, 2020, and July 11, 2023, 2399 patients were randomly assigned to receive the bioadaptor (n=1201) or DES (n=1198; ITT population). Median age was 69·5 years (IQR 61·2–75·6), 575 (24·0%) of 2399 patients were female, and 1824 (76·0%) were male (data on race and ethnicity were not collected), and 1838 (76·6%) patients presented with acute coronary syndrome. The primary endpoint of 12-month target lesion failure occurred in 28 (2·4%) of 1189 assessable patients in the bioadaptor group versus 33 (2·8%) of 1192 assessable patients in the DES group, with a risk difference of –0·41% (95% CI –1·94 to 1·11; p non-inferiority <0·0001). In the prespecified landmark analysis from 6 months to 12 months, the Kaplan–Meier estimates of target lesion failure were 0·3% (with events in three of 1170 patients) in the bioadaptor group versus 1·7% (with events in 16 of 1176 patients) in the DES group (hazard ratio 0·19 [95% CI 0·06 to 0·65]; p=0·0079), of target vessel failure were 0·8% (events in eight of 1167) versus 2·5% (events in 23 of 1174; 0·35 [0·16 to 0·79]; p=0·011), and of target lesion failure in patients with acute coronary syndrome were 0·3% (events in two of 906) versus 1·8% (events in 12 of 895; 0·17 [0·04 to 0·74]; p=0·018). The rate of definite or probable device thrombosis, which was recorded as a safety outcome, was low and did not differ between groups (eight [0·7%] of 1201 in the bioadaptor group vs six [0·5%] of 1198 in the DES group; difference in event rates of 0·16% [95% CI –0·50 to 0·83]). Among patients with coronary artery disease, including those with acute coronary syndrome, treatment with the bioadaptor was non-inferior to contemporary DES, showing potential to mitigate non-plateauing device-related events and improving outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. The additional planned follow-up will help to reinforce the clinical significance of the 1-year findings. Elixir Medical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the association of coronary plaque burden variables derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) before patients underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after PCI. Methods: Patients who underwent CCTA before their first PCI were included retrospectively. A radiologist and a cardiologist analyzed CCTA images on a dedicated workstation. The coronary plaque burden variables included total plaque volume, total percent atheroma volume, volumes and fractions of total low-attenuation plaque, total fibrous plaque, and total calcified plaque. The primary outcomes were MACEs, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and unscheduled coronary revascularization. Results: A total of 230 patients were included in the final analysis. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 67 MACEs occurred. Total plaque volume, total percent atheroma volume, volumes of total low-attenuation plaque and total fibrous plaque but not their fractions were independent predictors for MACEs. Compared with the first tertiles, the hazard ratio of the third tertile of total plaque volume, total percent atheroma volume, total low-attenuation plaque volume, and total fibrous plaque volume were 2.06 (95% CI: 1.03–4.15), 2.15 (95% CI: 1.02–4.51), 3.04 (95% CI: 1.45–6.36), and 2.23 (95% CI: 1.11–4.46), respectively. Neither total calcified plaque volume nor fraction was associated with MACEs independently. Conclusion: Selected pre-PCI CCTA-derived variables, including total percent atheroma volume, volumes of total plaque, total low-attenuation plaque and total fibrous plaque, were significantly associated with MACEs after PCI, suggesting that CCTA before PCI reveals the residual risk after revascularization. Clinical relevance statement: The coronary plaque burden variables derived from coronary computed tomography angiography before percutaneous coronary intervention are independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events, which could be instrumental in optimizing patient management. Key Points: Coronary plaque burden is associated with cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Selected total plaque burden variables derived from coronary computed tomography angiography before percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with poor prognosis. Routine coronary computed tomography angiography before percutaneous coronary intervention might be helpful in reducing future risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We assessed the safety of general thoracic surgery in patients with prior coronary stents undergoing lung resection, based on differences in perioperative antiplatelet therapy management. Methods: We retrospectively examined 150 patients with coronary artery stents who underwent pulmonary resection between July 2009 and July 2018. The impact of the antiplatelet agent on thoracic surgery safety was assessed by comparing perioperative outcomes, including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, among the discontinued antiplatelet therapy (group D), heparin bridging (group H), and continuous antiplatelet therapy (group C) groups. Results: Groups D, H, and C included twenty-four, eighty-four, and forty-two patients, respectively. Second-generation drug-eluting stents were used in > 50% of the patients. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, or operative duration. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in four (2.7%) patients, which was comparable among the groups. In group H, postoperative heart failure and transient ischemic attack with stroke occurred in one patient each. Major bleeding occurred in two (4.7%) patients in group C. Conclusions: Pulmonary resection surgical outcomes in patients with coronary artery stents were feasible regardless of antiplatelet therapy continuation. However, discontinuing dual-antiplatelet or single-antiplatelet therapy in such patients may be reasonable because this generation of drug-eluting stents has a higher safety profile than bare-metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the challenges posed by complex coronary lesions in interventional cardiology and the potential of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) as an alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) for treatment. Studies have shown the safety and efficacy of DCBs in various coronary artery conditions, including in-stent restenosis, bifurcation lesions, and small-sized vessels. The integration of nanoscale excipients and computational models has optimized the precision and efficacy of DCBs for complex coronary lesions, offering a transformative intervention strategy. Further research is needed to validate the utility of DCBs across different lesion types and patient demographics, while computational cardiology shows promise in driving precision medicine and improving patient outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

The document discusses the SPEAR technique, a novel approach for treating heavily calcified atherosclerotic lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia. The technique was used in four cases involving anterior or posterior tibial artery stenosis/occlusion. The SPEAR technique involves creating a channel for balloon crossing using a GaltStick Introducer System, enabling successful angioplasty in challenging cases. The study demonstrates promising results in achieving revascularization and improving toe pressure measurements, offering a potential alternative to surgery or amputation in severe below-the-knee atherosclerotic disease. [Extracted from the article]

The DynamX Bioadaptor is a novel implant with uncaging elements that disengage after polymer resorption and permits restoration of vessel function, thereby potentially reducing late adverse cardiac events. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel implant with imaging follow‐up at 6‐months, the time point when the bioadaptor starts to uncage. This prospective study enrolled 44 patients with up to two de novo lesions at seven centers in New Zealand treated with the DynamX Bioadaptor. Follow‐up was planned out to 12‐months. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were 6‐month target lesion failure (TLF) and late lumen loss. Patients presented with non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction in 49%. Lesions (n = 45) were 16.0 ± 6.7 mm long, and 2.81 ± 0.41 mm in diameter. Device and procedure success were 100%, and acute lumen gain was 1.93 ± 0.35 mm. At 6‐months, median in‐device late lumen loss was 0.09 mm (IQR:0.05–0.16). Measured by intravascular ultrasound, the vessel, lumen, and device area remained constant. By optical coherence tomography, 96.4% ± 5.9% of struts per lesion were covered. Out to 12‐months, no TLF and no definite or probable device thrombosis were reported. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the safety and performance of the DynamX Bioadaptor with excellent 12‐month clinical and 6‐month imaging outcomes comparable to best‐in‐class drug‐eluting stents (DES). Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03634020, NCT05464147, NCT04562805, and NCT04192747. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article focuses on various topics related to ischaemic heart disease, including secondary prevention, cardiogenic shock, and novel therapeutic targets. One specific topic discussed is the management of aortic disease in children with FBN1-related Marfan syndrome, a hereditary connective tissue disorder. The article highlights the challenges in diagnosing and treating this condition in children and emphasizes the need for more research and uniform treatment guidelines. Other topics covered include the redefinition of myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery, the management of cardiogenic shock, and the importance of secondary prevention in patients with known cardiovascular disease. The article also explores the relationship between non-HDL cholesterol levels after a heart attack and the risk of adverse outcomes. Additionally, it discusses the role of vascular smooth muscle cell senescence in the development of atherosclerosis. The article concludes with commentary on cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention. Overall, this comprehensive article provides valuable insights into various aspects of ischaemic heart disease and offers recommendations for further research and treatment strategies. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The performance of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) was inferior to an everolimus-eluting metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) with permanent polymer, mainly due the mechanical features of BRS technology. The performance of BRS as compared to metallic DES with bioresorbable polymers remains unstudied. Methods: This prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial enrolled patients who underwent coronary stenting for de novo coronary lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) or everolimus-eluting BRS. The primary endpoint was percentage diameter stenosis (in-device) at 6- to 8-month angiographic surveillance. The main secondary endpoint was the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of cardiac death/target vessel-myocardial infarction/target lesion revascularization assessed after 12 months and 5 years. Results: The trial was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 117 of 230 patients (BP-EES, n = 60; BRS, n = 57) due to safety issues associated with BRS technology. The primary endpoint of in-device diameter stenosis at angiographic surveillance was 12.5 ± 7.7% with BP-EES versus 19.3 ± 16.5% with BRS (p = 0.01). The DOCE occurred in 5.0% in the BP-EES group versus 12.3% of patients in the BRS group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–9.58, p = 0.19) after 12 months and in 11.7% in the BP-EES group versus 26.4% of patients in the BRS group (HR 2.38, 95% CI 0.97–5.84, p = 0.06) after 5 years. Conclusions: BP-EES showed superior mid-term angiographic performance compared with BRS. Clinical event rates did not differ significantly between the groups up to 5 years of follow-up. These results should be interpreted with caution in view of the premature discontinuation of the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction : In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare whether perioperative additional intravenous (IV) Iloprost therapy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease improves patency and reintervention. Methods : Between January 2018 and August 2020, 183 patients underwent Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with Drug-Eluting Balloons (DEB) for femoropopliteal lesions (TASC 2 A-C) due to claudication, and 161 patients (133 male, 28 female, mean age 63.65 ± 11.16 years, range 30-86 years) were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups as DEB+ Intravenous Iloprost administration and DEB alone. Primary patency, reintervention, bailout stenting, and survival rates were analyzed in this retrospective study. Results : Primary patency rate at 12 months (79 vs 57 patients, 89.7 vs 78%, p = 0.041) and assisted primary patency rate (81 vs 59 patients, 92 vs 80.8%, p = 0.035) were found to be higher and Bailout stent deployment was lower in DEB + Iloprost group (3 vs 9 patients, 3.4 vs 12.3% p = 0.031). The reinterventions rate at 12 months was also lower among the DEB + Iloprost group (9 vs 16 patients, 10.2 vs 21.9%, p = 0.041). Conclusion : The present study demonstrated that primary patency at 12 months and assisted primary patency rates, freedom from reintervention was significantly higher and bailout stenting was found to be significantly lower. We believe that perioperative Intravenous Iloprost therapy is beneficial for PTA and improves outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Investigations of very long‐term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug‐eluting stents (DES) according to clinical presentation are scarce. Here, we investigated the 10‐year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing DES‐PCI according to clinical presentation.Patient‐level data from five randomized trials with 10‐year follow‐up after DES‐PCI were pooled. Patients were dichotomized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) groups as per clinical presentation. The primary outcome was all‐cause death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST) and repeat revascularization involving the target lesion (TLR), target vessel (TVR) or non‐target vessel (nTVR).Of the 9700 patients included in this analysis, 4557 presented with ACS and 5143 with CCS. Compared with CCS patients, ACS patients had a higher risk of all‐cause death and nTVR in the first year, but comparable risk thereafter. In addition, ACS patients had a higher risk of MI [adjusted hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval (1.04–1.41)] and definite ST [adjusted hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval (1.14–1.92)], while the risk of TLR and TVR was not significantly different up to 10‐year follow‐up.Compared to CCS patients, ACS patients treated with PCI and DES implantation have an increased risk of all‐cause death and repeat revascularization of remote vessels up to 1 year, with no significant differences thereafter and up to 10‐year follow‐up. ACS patients have a consistently higher risk of MI and definite ST. Whether these differences persist with current antithrombotic and secondary prevention therapies requires further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention require a combination of oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The use of a coronary stent with a thromboresistant and prohealing coating may allow an abbreviated duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without an increase in the risk of thromboembolic events. METHODS: Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to treatment with the COBRA polyzene F (PzF) stent followed by 14 days of DAPT or a Food and Drug Administration– approved new-generation drug-eluting stent followed by 3 or 6 months of DAPT. The bleeding coprimary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 beyond 14 days (or after hospital discharge) until 6 months. The thromboembolic coprimary end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke at 6 months. The trial hypothesis was that the COBRA PzF stent strategy would be superior with respect to bleeding events and noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events. RESULTS: A total of 996 patients underwent randomization. The bleeding end point occurred in 37 of 475 patients (7.8%) in the COBRA PzF group and 47 of 482 patients (9.8%) in the control group (difference, −2.0 [95% CI, −5.6 to 1.6]; P=0.14). The thromboembolic end point occurred in 37 of 492 patients (7.5%) in the COBRA PzF group and 24 of 490 patients (4.9%) in the control group (difference, 2.6%; prespecified noninferiority margin 5%, upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI of the difference, 5.2%; Pnoninferiority=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with the COBRA PzF stent plus 14 days of DAPT was not superior with respect to bleeding events and was not noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events at 6 months compared with treatment with standard Food and Drug Administration– approved drug-eluting stent plus 3 to 6 months of DAPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Herz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Ou Yang,1 Yuhuan Teng,1 Ruoxi Zhang,2 Jie Qu1 1Department of Cadre Ward, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Cardiology, Harbin Yinghua Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150199, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jie Qu; Ruoxi Zhang, Email qj610714@jlu.edu.cn; ruoxizhang8@qq.comIntroduction: Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (PF-SES) possess multiple properties improving targeted drug elution and in-stent reendothelialization without the presence of polymers. The long-term clinical performance comparison between PF-SES and the latest generation polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), particularly regarding intravascular imaging assessment and in the type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) population, remains unexplored.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 2646 diabetes patients meeting coronary artery disease (CAD) criteria underwent coronary stents in the real-world. All patients were divided into the PF-SES group and the SES group. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the imaging characteristics of in-stent reendothelialization. Patient information between the two groups was systematically compared in hospital and at 5-year follow-up.Results: In terms of basic characteristics, the proportion of current smoker and stable angina patients in the PF-SES group was significantly higher than that in the SES group. The PF-SES group exhibited significantly higher rate of left anterior descending (LAD) lesion and more stents per patients compared to the SES group. The value of minimum lumen area (MLA), neointimal area (NA) and neointimal thickness (NT) were higher in the PF-SES group. Additionally, the occurrence rates of heterogeneous, lipid layer, intimal tears, thrombi, and micro-vessels were notably lower in the PF-SES group compared to the SES group. A higher all-cause mortality was observed in the SES cohort.Discussion: PF-SES could effectively improve in-stent reendothelialization in patients with type 2 DM, with positive effects on survival rate and may, therefore, be considered as an alternative treatment option for improving clinical long-term outcomes.Keywords: Polymer-free, polymer-coated, Nano Plus stent, drug-eluting stents, type 2 diabetes mellitus, optical coherence tomography

This case report details the interdisciplinary care provided to a 48-year-old male patient with severe aortic valve stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a community hospital setting. Focus is placed on the interdisciplinary team model demonstrated in the care of this patient, including interventional cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery from the outpatient to the inpatient setting. The use of decision-making tools, including the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Calculator, and a collaborative, shared decision-making approach will be discussed. The care and evaluation of the patient will be presented and compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Clinical events such as angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome, and sudden death caused by myocardial bridge (MB) have attracted increasing attention. It is still a challenge to diagnose whether MB can cause the symptoms of patients with MB. For most MB patients, medication remains the primary treatment. Case presentation This article reports a case of chest pain in a patient with MB in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (LADm) with moderate stenosis in the proximal segment (LADp). Through functional assessment, we found that neither MB nor fixed stenosis had sufficient effect on coronary blood flow to cause myocardial ischemia, but their synergistic effect resulted in myocardial ischemia. Finally, a stent was implanted in LADp and good clinical results were achieved. Conclusions For symptomatic patients with MB combined with fixed stenosis, functional evaluation may be necessary, which has significant guiding significance for treatment strategy selection. For asymptomatic patients, early detection of myocardial ischemia may also improve the prognosis of patients.

Background: Conus artery occlusion is a rare life-threatening event, typically secondary to iatrogenic etiology, and is treated mainly with conservative therapy and/or balloon angioplasty without stenting. However, treatment remains challenging. Case presentation: We report the case of a 60-year-old man with a known history of coronary artery disease presenting with multiple internal defibrillator cardioversions due to an electrical storm (recurrent ventricular fibrillation). The coronary angiography showed an acute occlusion of the conus artery arising from the proximal segment of the right coronary artery, treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting (drug-eluting stent) without any serious complications. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature where a non-iatrogenic occlusion of the conus artery causing a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and electrical storm was treated with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stenting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ideal single antiplatelet therapy for long-term maintenance after coronary stenting remains uncertain. In a head-to-head comparison, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of aspirin and clopidogrel as monotherapies in this patient cohort. Method: We reviewed 1044 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, between January 2019 and December 2021 and completed a 12-month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) treatment. They were divided into two groups: 582 were assigned to the aspirin group (100 mg/day) and 422 to the clopidogrel group (75 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the composite cardiac death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding type 3 or greater. Secondary endpoint events included all-cause death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding (defined as a BARC type ≥ 2 bleeding), and gastrointestinal complications. Results: After a mean observation period of 25 ± 8.4 months, the primary endpoint event occurred in 29 (6.8%) patients in the clopidogrel group and 30 (5.1%) in the aspirin group, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.253). In BARC type 2 or greater bleeding events, there were 9 (1.5%) in the aspirin group compared to 7 (1.7%) in the clopidogrel group, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.160). Conclusion: After 12-month DAPT in Chinese patients undergoing DES implantation, aspirin monotherapy versus clopidogrel monotherapy showed no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of safety and efficacy in terms of hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiac death, and bleeding with BARC type 2 or greater. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: For patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) stenosis, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of 6- versus 12-month DAPT duration in patients with PCI of an uLMCA and stable angina. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we included consecutive patients of our centre who underwent PCI of uLMCA stenosis for stable angina and who received DAPT with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for either 6 or 12 months. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at one year. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding. Clinical outcomes were assessed by unadjusted analysis and by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Out of 984 included patients, 339 (34.5%) received DAPT for 6 months and 645 (65.5%) for 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 patients (15.2%) in the 6-month group and in 104 (16.3%) in the 12-month group (p = 0.674). Incidences of stent thrombosis (0.9% versus 0.3%, p = 0.224) and BARC 3,4,5 bleeding (6% versus 5.8%, p = 0.808) were also comparable in both groups. We found no significant differences in the primary endpoint and its components or BARC 3,4,5 bleeding between 6 and 12 months. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the extension of DAPT beyond 6 months after PCI for uLMCA in patients with stable angina. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The long-term impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting to intended drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment for patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery lesions. REC-CAGEFREE I was an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial conducted at 43 sites in China. After successful lesion pre-dilatation, patients aged 18 years or older with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease (irrespective of target vessel diameter) and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based centralised system with block randomisation (block size of two, four, or six) and stratified by site, to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with the option of rescue stenting due to an unsatisfactory result (DCB group) or intended deployment of second-generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stents (DES group). The primary outcome was the device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE; including cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularisation) assessed at 24 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the absolute risk difference was smaller than 2·68%. Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04561739. It is closed to accrual and extended follow-up is ongoing. Between Feb 5, 2021, and May 1, 2022, 2272 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB group (1133 [50%]) or the DES group (1139 [50%]). Median age at the time of randomisation was 62 years (IQR 54–69), 1574 (69·3%) of 2272 were male, 698 (30·7%) were female, and all patients were of Chinese ethnicity. 106 (9·4%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group received rescue DES after unsatisfactory DCB angioplasty. As of data cutoff (May 1, 2024), median follow-up was 734 days (IQR 731–739). At 24 months, the DoCE occurred in 72 (6·4%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group and 38 (3·4%) of 1139 in the DES group, with a risk difference of 3·04% in the cumulative event rate (upper boundary of the one-sided 95% CI 4·52; p non-inferiority =0·65; two-sided 95% CI 1·27–4·81; p=0·0008); the criterion for non-inferiority was not met. During intervention, no acute vessel closures occurred in the DCB group and one (0·1%) of 1139 patients in the DES group had acute vessel closure. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in ten (0·9%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group and nine (0·8%) in the DES group. In patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease, irrespective of vessel diameter, a strategy of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting did not achieve non-inferiority compared with the intended DES implantation in terms of the DoCE at 2 years, which indicates that DES should remain the preferred treatment for this patient population. Xijing Hospital and Shenqi Medical. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This pooled analysis was conducted to assess the clinical safety and performance of the Supra family (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Ltd., Surat, India) of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from two real-world all-comers Indian registries at 1 year. Methods: We evaluated 1,824 patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with the Supra family of SES from two real-world Indian registries (891 patients from T-Flex registry and 933 patients from Tetriflex real-world registry). The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1-year follow-up. The safety endpoint was stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. Results: Among a total of 1,824 patients with ACS, 689 (37.8%) patients presented with STEMI. In ACS and STEMI groups, 47.6% and 41.8% patients had multivessel disease, respectively. Of 2,128 lesions in ACS group, 76.7% lesions were type B2/C and 16.2% lesions were totally occluded. In the STEMI group, out of 784 treated lesions, 76.7% were type B2/C lesions and 21.9% were totally occluded. At 1-year follow-up, incidence of TLF was 5.3% (cardiac death: 0.9%, TV-MI: 2.5%, TLR: 1.9%) in patients with ACS and 6.2% (cardiac death: 1.4%, TV-MI: 2.1%, TLR: 2.7%) in patients with STEMI. The 1-year rate of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 0.3% and 0.7% in patients with ACS and STEMI, respectively. Conclusion: This patient-level pooled analysis provides evidence for the safe and effective use of the Supra family of SES in complex patient populations such as ACS and even in STEMI with favorable rates of TLF and stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Post-infarction ventricular septal defect formation remains a formidable mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: We describe the case of a 72-year-old male who was admitted with post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect and cardiogenic shock. Discussion: Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist as temporary left ventricular assist device provided sufficient support throughout multiple bridging episodes including failed percutaneous repair and subsequent definitive surgical repair. Contemporary management of post-infarction ventricular septal defect is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are many questions regarding the optimal approach to treating non-culprit lesions in STEMI patients. Several questions still need to be answered, such as identifying the lesions to be revascularized and the optimal timing. Methods: We conducted a single-center analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of major cardiovascular and cerebral adverse events (MACCE) at 12 months in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease (MVD) who achieved complete revascularization during the index procedure or with a staged procedure. The secondary outcomes were death from any cause, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stroke, major bleeding events, new angina episodes, new hospitalization, and in-hospital MACCE. Results: From January 2021 to December 2022, a total of 230 patients with STEMI underwent primary PCI in our department; 87 patients had MVD. Fifty-nine patients (67.8%) underwent a non-culprit revascularization strategy during the index procedure strategy, and 28 patients (32.2%) during a staged procedure. The incidence of MACCE at 12 months was 11.9% (seven patients) in the index PCI group, compared with 32.1% (nine patients) in the staged PCI group (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.15 to 10.77; p = 0.022). In-hospital MACCE occurred in five patients (8.5%) of the index PCI group, compared with seven patients (25%) in the staged PCI group (odds ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.03 to 12.61; p = 0.036). A trend towards better outcomes favoring the index PCI group was observed with death from any cause, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and new angina episodes. Conclusions: Better outcomes were evident with an index PCI strategy than with a staged PCI strategy for complete revascularization in patients with STEMI and MVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Guidelines on myocardial revascularization define recommendations for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Only little information exists on long-term follow-up and quality of life (QoL) after CABG preceded by PCI. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of prior PCI on outcome and QoL in patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent CABG. Methods In our retrospective study, CABG patients were divided in: CABG preceded by PCI: PCI-first (PCF), and CABG-only (CO) groups. The PCF group was further divided in guideline-conform (GCO) and guideline nonconform (GNC) subgroups, according to the SYNTAX score (2014 European Society of Cardiology [ESC]/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery [EACTS] guidelines). Thirty days mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and QoL using the European Quality-of-Life–5 Dimensions were evaluated. Results A total of 997 patients were analyzed, of which 784 underwent CABG without (CO), and 213 individuals with prior PCI (PCF). The latter group consisted of 67 patients being treated in accordance (GCO), and 24 in discordance (GNC) to the 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines. Reinfarction (PCF: 3.8% vs. CO: 1.0%; p = 0.024), re-angiography (PCF: 17.6% vs. CO: 9.0%; p = 0.004), and re-PCI (PCF: 10.4% vs. CO: 3.0%; p < 0.001) were observed more frequently in PCF patients. Also, patients reported better health status in the CO compared to PCF group (CO: 72.48 ± 19.31 vs. PCF: 68.20 ± 17.86; p = 0.01). Patients from the guideline nonconform subgroup reported poorer health status compared to the guideline-conform group (GNC: 64.23 ± 14.56 vs. GCO: 73.42 ± 17.66; p = 0.041) and were more likely to require re-PCI (GNC: 18.8% vs. GCO: 2.4%; p = 0.03). Also, GNC patients were more likely to have left main stenosis (GCO: 19.7% vs. GNC: 37.5%; p < 0.001) and showed higher preinterventional SYNTAX score (GCO: 18.63 ± 9.81 vs. GNC: 26.67 ± 5.07; p < 0.001). Conclusion PCI preceding CABG is associated with poorer outcomes such as reinfarction, re-angiography, and re-PCI, but also worse health status and higher rehospitalization. Nevertheless, results were better when PCI was guideline-conformant. This data should impact the Heart Team decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the efficacy of aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with incident atherosclerotic CVD and mortality in high‐risk type 2 diabetes. Method s : In this post hoc analysis, we included participants in the ACCORD trial without CVD at baseline. The association between aspirin use and the primary outcome (a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or cardiovascular [CV] death) and all‐cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for demographics, CV risk factors and comorbidities. Results: Eligible participants (n = 6330) were aged 62.8 ± 5.9 years at baseline, 43.8% of the participants were female, and 3026 (47.8%) used aspirin. Over a median (interquartile range) follow‐up of 4.9 (4.1–5.7) years, the number (%) of primary outcome and all‐cause mortality events in those who used aspirin (vs. those who did not), was 196 (6.5) versus 229 (6.9) and 146 (4.8) versus 147 (4.5), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) associated with aspirin use for the primary outcome and all‐cause mortality were 0.94 (0.77–1.14) and 1.08 (0.85–1.36), respectively. Conclusion: In high‐risk individuals with type 2 diabetes, the use of aspirin for primary prevention was not associated with a decreased risk of incident CVD or all‐cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Information from published studies describing dental treatment of nonmilitary personnel in a military theater of operations is sparse. The primary objective of this study is to determine the number of dental emergencies (DEs) and the types of dental treatment rendered on non-U.S. military (civilian) personnel treated by Navy dentists in 2007-2008 in Iraq and 2009 in Afghanistan. The second objective is to compare the type of DE treatment procedures provided to civilian personnel to the type of DE treatment procedures performed on U.S. military personnel. Materials and Methods Navy Dental Officers documented the diagnoses of unscheduled DEs. All treatment provided was described at the time of treatment using the Current Dental Terminology codes of the American Dental Association. Current Dental Terminology Code A0145 (2007 and earlier) and A0199 (2008 onward) in the patient encounter indicated a DE. This study is limited to DE occurring in (1) patient categories: U.S. civilian employees, other beneficiaries of the U.S. Government, foreign national civilian/dependents, and civilian, no government connection and (2) U.S. military service members. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare the proportion of dental treatment category procedures on civilian patients compared to those on U.S. military patients. Results During the reporting period, 308 patients were treated for DE in Afghanistan. Civilians treated accounted for 18.5% (n  = 57) of all DEs. Nearly 93.0% of civilians who were treated were U.S. (DoD) civilian employees. Of the 57 civilian patients treated for DE, 61.4% of patients (n  = 35) received oral surgery. There were 251 U.S. military patient encounters (81.5% of all DEs). Restorative dentistry was the most common dental procedure for military personnel DE. When comparing civilian and military patients, civilian patients are statistically more likely than military patients to receive oral surgery treatment for DE (P  < .00001). In Iraq, 3,198 patients were treated for DE during the reporting period. Civilians treated accounted for 18.8% (n  = 601) of all DEs. About 56.9% (n  = 342) of civilians who were treated were U.S. contract employees. Of the 601 civilian patients treated for DE, 37.1% (n  = 223) received oral surgery. There were 2,597 U.S. military patient DE encounters, and restorative dentistry was the most common dental procedure. When comparing civilian and U.S. military patients in Iraq, civilians are statistically less likely to have their DE treated by restorative dentistry (P  < .00001) and are more likely have it treated by oral surgery/extractions (P  < .00001). It is significantly more likely for civilians to have multiple categories of DE that must be treated (P < .00001). Conclusions The primary group of civilians treated for DE in Afghanistan was U.S. civilian employees. The primary group of civilians treated for DE in Iraq were contract employees of the U.S. Government. The primary dental treatment of civilian beneficiaries in both the theaters of operation was oral surgery. This brings into question what dental fitness standards are there for primarily U.S. civilian and contract employees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that drug-coated balloons may benefit in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment. However, the efficacy of new-generation sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the latest generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) has not been studied in this setting. METHODS: All patients in the EASTBORNE (The All-Comers Sirolimus-Coated Balloon European Registry) and DEB-DRAGON (DEB vs Thin-DES in DES-ISR: Long Term Outcomes) registries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for DESISR were included in the study. The primary study end point was target lesion revascularization at 24 months. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 24 months. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCB versus thin-struts DES in ISR at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients with 1679 ISR lesions were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 621 (40.2%) patients with 621 lesions were treated with thin-strut DES and 924 (59.8%) patients with 1045 lesions were treated with SCB. The unmatched cohort showed no differences in the incidence of target lesion revascularization (10.8% versus 11.8%; P=0.568); however, there was a trend toward lower rates of myocardial infarction (7.4% versus 5.0%; P=0.062) and major adverse cardiovascular events (20.8% versus 17.1%; P=0.072) in the SCB group. After propensity score matching (n=335 patients per group), there were no significant differences in the rates of target lesion revascularization (11.6% versus 11.8%; P=0.329), target vessel revascularization (14.0% versus 13.1%; P=0.822), myocardial infarction (7.2% versus 4.5%; P=0.186), all-cause death (5.7% versus 4.2%; P=0.476), and major adverse cardiovascular event (21.5% versus 17.6%; P=0.242) between DES and SCB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, angioplasty with SCB compared with thin-struts DES is associated with comparable rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: A graphic abstract is available for this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetes mellitus is associated with higher risk of target lesion failure (TLF) after percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the 5-year outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with biodegradable polymer stents. Methods: The SORT OUT VII was a randomised trial comparing the ultrathin sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (O-SES) and the biolimus-eluting Nobori stent (N-BES) in an all-comer setting. Patients (n = 2525) were randomised to receive O-SES (n = 1261, diabetes: n = 236) or N-BES (n = 1264, diabetes: n = 235). Endpoints were TLF (a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR)), definite stent thrombosis and a patient related outcome (all-cause mortality, MI and revascularization) within 5 years. Results: Patients with diabetes mellitus had higher TLF (20.6% vs 11.0%, (Rate ratio (RR) 1.85 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.42-2.40) and patient related outcome (42.0% vs 31.0%, RR 1.43 95% CI: (1.19-1.71)) compared to patients without diabetes. Among patients with diabetes mellitus, TLF after 5 years did not differ between O-SES and N-BES (21.2% vs 20.0%), RR 1.05 95% CI: (0.70-1.58), p = 0.81). Cardiac death, MI, TLR, and definite stent thrombosis did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: In patients with diabetes mellitus, 5-year outcomes were similar among patients treated with biodegradable polymer O-SES or N-BES. Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01879358. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a collection of abstracts from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) conference. The abstracts cover a wide range of topics related to interventional radiology procedures, including the use of drug-coated devices for femoropopliteal lesions, different thrombectomy techniques for deep vein thrombosis, thermal ablation procedures for renal cell carcinoma, and embolic agents for bronchial artery embolization. The abstracts provide valuable insights into the advancements and outcomes of interventional radiology procedures for various medical conditions. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is common, but PPI may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the impact of PPI use on clinical outcomes in post-PCI patients, by incorporating P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and CYP2C19 genotyping results. Methods: From a multicenter registry of patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and received clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), patients who were prescribed a PPI at the time of PCI (PPI users) were compared to those who were not (non-users). The primary outcome included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or cerebrovascular accident at 12 months. Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 3–5) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (BARC types 3–5) were important secondary outcomes. The adjusted outcomes were compared using a 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching and competing risk analysis. Results: Of 13,160 patients, 2,235 (17.0%) were prescribed PPI, with an average age of 65.4 years. PPI users had higher on-treatment PRU levels than non-users. After PS matching, the primary outcome occurred in 51 patients who were PPI users (cumulative incidence, 4.7%) and 41 patients who were non-users (cumulative incidence, 3.7%; log-rank p = 0.27). In carriers of both CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, PPI use was linked to an increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–8.78). The incidence of major bleeding and GI bleeding (BARC types 3–5) was comparable between PPI users and non-users in the PS-matched cohort. Conclusions: In post-PCI patients receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, PPI use was not linked to an increased risk of adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, but there was a small but significant increase in on-treatment PRU. Future research using a more individualized approach would further elucidate these interactions and guide evidence-based clinical practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims. We described our advancement in the field of robotic cardiac surgery, particularly in the context of coronary revascularization. We will outline how the application of the Da Vinci® X Surgical System in coronary surgery is safe, feasible, and reproducible after an adequate familiarization with the docking system, that could come from a previous mitral valve robotic program, and after a sufficient learning time period. Methods. Between February 2021 and December 2023, a cohort of 33 patients underwent coronary artery revascularization surgery, involving robotic harvesting of the left mammary artery and off‐pump hand‐direct bypass to the left descending coronary artery or marginal coronary artery. In cases of hybrid revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stent placement was performed either before or after surgery. Results. There were no mortalities within 30 days and at 1 year of follow‐up after surgery. Notably, 70% of patients were extubated in the operating room immediately following the surgical procedure. The median postoperative mechanical ventilation time was 0 [0–4] hours, and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 21 [20–48] hours. A progressive reduction of the console and instrumental Da Vinci® X Surgical System was underling after the 21st patient. Conclusion. The promising outcomes observed in this series highlight that robotic‐assisted coronary artery bypass represents a well‐established technique that could be reproducible, especially when integrated into a hybrid strategy. Initiating a program in robotic‐assisted coronary artery bypass surgery can be effectively attained in particularly when a well‐established background in Da Vinci® X Surgical System utilization is achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present paper investigates constrained global optimization techniques for computationally expensive black box functions that are globally defined but subject to some a priori unknown taboo regions. This challenge typically arises in healthcare applications, where the goal is to maximize the efficacy of a drug while staying within critical safety limits imposed by an external medical regulator. Motivated by the additional challenge where the constrained global optimum lies along the constraint boundary, we comparatively assess the performance of established optimization methods coupled with different acquisition functions in terms of accuracy and efficiency on the physiological application aforementioned and several benchmark problems representative of the complexity of the physiological application. We find the best method based on an average score computed across all applications. We also propose an ensemble method combining results from individual methods, which vastly outperforms the best average method. Furthermore, our study provides a thorough qualitative analysis of the optimization results, emphasizing the challenges a user may encounter when applying Bayesian optimization on constrained optimization problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the results of the FORZA trial, which compared the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the management of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (AICLs). The trial found that both FFR and OCT guidance provided similar rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at the 5-year follow-up. The study suggests that OCT could be a valuable alternative to FFR for the management of patients with AICLs, but further investigation is needed to determine the optimal use of these tools. The article acknowledges the limitations of the study, including a small sample size and unreliable symptom assessment at long-term follow-up. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Clinical events such as angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome, and sudden death caused by myocardial bridge (MB) have attracted increasing attention. It is still a challenge to diagnose whether MB can cause the symptoms of patients with MB. For most MB patients, medication remains the primary treatment. Case presentation: This article reports a case of chest pain in a patient with MB in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (LADm) with moderate stenosis in the proximal segment (LADp). Through functional assessment, we found that neither MB nor fixed stenosis had sufficient effect on coronary blood flow to cause myocardial ischemia, but their synergistic effect resulted in myocardial ischemia. Finally, a stent was implanted in LADp and good clinical results were achieved. Conclusions: For symptomatic patients with MB combined with fixed stenosis, functional evaluation may be necessary, which has significant guiding significance for treatment strategy selection. For asymptomatic patients, early detection of myocardial ischemia may also improve the prognosis of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim • To compare the operation-related indexes, complication rates, and cardiac function indexes of bioresorbable scaffolds with drug-eluting scaffolds in coronary non-left main stem lesions and to clarify the clinical value of bioresorbable scaffolds in percutaneous coronary intervention for non-left main stem lesions. Methods • The retrospective study sample consisted of 60 non-left main stem lesions treated using bioresorbable stent or drug-eluting stents between June 2022 and June 2023. Comparison of surgical operation-related indexes, intraoperative and postoperative complications, cardiac function indexes, adverse cardiovascular events, and surgical success rate between the two groups. Results • The surgical operation time and X-ray exposure time of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group, and contrast agent dosage was lower than that of the control group (P < .05). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher than that in the control group at one month after surgery, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The total incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was lower in the experimental group than in the control group (15.6% VS. 71.4%)(P < .05). Conclusion • Bioresorbable scaffolds are more effective than drug-eluting scaffolds in treating non-left main stem lesions by percutaneous coronary intervention. Furthermore, bioresorbable scaffolds could be considered a preferable option for certain patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for non-left main stem lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]