76 results on '"Dinovi, M."'
Search Results
2. Evaluation of certain food additives: eighty-sixth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives
- Author
-
Barlow, S., Bend, J., Benford, D., Cantrill, R., Folmer, D., Mattia, A., Mueller, U., Orisakwe, O. E., Schlatter, J., Smith, J., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Bruno, A., Andersen, J. H., Barrows, J. N., Béchaux, C., Dinovi, M., Fallico, B., Fan, Y., Fernandez, M. J. F., Fields, B., Hambridge, T., Hill, F., Jeurissen, S. M. F., Jia, X., Kim, S., Laurvick, K., Lipp, M., Mosesso, P., Odrowaz, J., Petersen, K., Rosenfeld, L., Rotstein, J., Srinivasan, J. R., Sugimoto, N., Takasu, S., Tritscher, A., Umemura, T., Yang, X., and L. Zhang.
- Published
- 2019
3. Risk to human and animal health related to the presence of 4,15-diacetoxyscirpenol in food and feed
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Knutsen, HK, Alexander, J, Barregård, L, Bignami, M, Brüschweiler, B, Ceccatelli, S, Cottrill, B, Dinovi, M, Grasl‐Kraupp, B, Hogstrand, C, Hoogenboom, LR, Nebbia, CS, Oswald, IP, Petersen, A, Rose, M, Roudot, A, Schwerdtle, T, Vleminckx, C, Vollmer, G, Wallace, H, De Saeger, S, Eriksen, GS, Farmer, P, Fremy, J, Gong, YY, Meyer, K, Parent‐Massin, D, van Egmond, H, Altieri, A, Colombo, P, Horváth, Z, Levorato, S, Edler, L, Norwegian Institute of Public Health [Oslo] (NIPH), King‘s College London, Biosynthèse & Toxicité des Mycotoxines (ToxAlim-BioToMyc), ToxAlim (ToxAlim), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan (INPT - EI Purpan), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), and Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Tolerable daily intake ,15 - diacetoxyscirpenol ,Novel Foods & Agrochains ,Plant Science ,Novel Foods & Agroketens ,01 natural sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Medicine ,TX341-641 ,BU Toxicology, Novel Foods & Agrochains ,2. Zero hunger ,biology ,BU Toxicology ,4,15 - diacetoxyscirpenol ,3. Good health ,MAS ,Chemical Contaminants ,BU Toxicologie, Novel Foods & Agroketens ,[SDV.TOX]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology ,Toxicity ,Fusarium ,BU Toxicologie ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,[SDV.TOX.TVM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology/Vegetal toxicology and mycotoxicology ,[SDV.TOX.TCA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology/Toxicology and food chain ,TP1-1185 ,Microbiology ,Diacetoxyscirpenol ,03 medical and health sciences ,Animal science ,Toxicokinetics ,human and animal risk assessment ,Mycotoxin ,Adverse effect ,VLAG ,Reference dose ,[SDV.BA.MVSA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology/Veterinary medicine and animal Health ,anguidine ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,business.industry ,Chemical technology ,010401 analytical chemistry ,toxicity ,DAS ,biology.organism_classification ,0104 chemical sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,Scientific Opinion ,chemistry ,exposure ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,business ,4,15 ‐ diacetoxyscirpenol ,15 -diacetoxyscirpenol ,Food Science - Abstract
International audience; 4,15-Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) is a mycotoxin primarily produced by Fusarium fungi and occurring predominantly in cereal grains. As requested by the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) assessed the risk of DAS to human and animal health related to its presence in food and feed. Very limited information was available on toxicity and on toxicokinetics in experimental and farm animals. Due to the limitations in the available data set, human acute and chronic health-based guidance values (HBGV) were established based on data obtained in clinical trials of DAS as an anticancer agent (anguidine) after intravenous administration to cancer patients. The CONTAM Panel considered these data as informative for the hazard characterisation of DAS after oral exposure. The main adverse effects after acute and repeated exposure were emesis, with a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 32 lg DAS/kg body weight (bw), and haematotoxicity, with a NOAEL of 65 lg DAS/kg bw, respectively. An acute reference dose (ARfD) of 3.2 lg DAS/kg bw and a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 0.65 lg DAS/kg bw were established. Based on over 15,000 occurrence data, the highest acute and chronic dietary exposures were estimated to be 0.8 and 0.49 lg DAS/kg bw per day, respectively, and were not of health concern for humans. The limited information for poultry, pigs and dogs indicated a low risk for these animals at the estimated DAS exposure levels under current feeding practices, with the possible exception of fattening chicken. Assuming similar or lower sensitivity than for poultry, the risk was considered overall low for other farm and companion animal species for which no toxicity data were available. In consideration of the similarities of several trichothecenes and the likelihood of co-exposure via food and feed, it could be appropriate to perform a cumulative risk assessment for this group of substances.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of moniliformin in food and feed
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Knutsen, HK, Alexander, J, Barregård, L, Bignami, M, Brüschweiler, B, Ceccatelli, S, Cottrill, B, Dinovi, M, Grasl‐Kraupp, B, Hogstrand, C, Hoogenboom, LR, Nebbia, CS, Oswald, IP, Petersen, A, Rose, M, Roudot, AC, Schwerdtle, T, Vleminckx, C, Vollmer, G, Wallace, H, De Saeger, S, Eriksen, GS, Farmer, P, Fremy, J-M, Gong, YY, Meyer, K, Naegeli, H, Parent‐Massin, D, van Egmond, H, Altieri, A, Colombo, P, Eskola, M, van Manen, M, Edler, L, Norwegian Institute of Public Health [Oslo] (NIPH), King‘s College London, Biosynthèse & Toxicité des Mycotoxines (ToxAlim-BioToMyc), ToxAlim (ToxAlim), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan (INPT - EI Purpan), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), and Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
- Subjects
Agriculture and Food Sciences ,GIBBERELLA-FUJIKUROI ,0301 basic medicine ,Novel Foods & Agrochains ,IONIZATION MASS-SPECTROMETRY ,assessment ,Plant Science ,medicine.disease_cause ,Novel Foods & Agroketens ,01 natural sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Occurrence ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,TX341-641 ,TURKEY POULTS ,BU Toxicology, Novel Foods & Agrochains ,Mink ,biology ,BU Toxicology ,3. Good health ,BU Toxicologie, Novel Foods & Agroketens ,Human and animal risk assessment ,[SDV.TOX]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology ,Toxicity ,LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY ,Risk assessment ,moniliformin ,BU Toxicologie ,Veterinary (miscellaneous) ,030106 microbiology ,[SDV.TOX.TVM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology/Vegetal toxicology and mycotoxicology ,human and animal risk ,FUSARIUM MYCOTOXIN MONILIFORMIN ,FUMONISIN B-1 ,TP1-1185 ,[SDV.TOX.TCA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology/Toxicology and food chain ,occurrence ,Microbiology ,Exposure ,03 medical and health sciences ,Animal science ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,biology.animal ,SELENIUM DEFICIENCY ,medicine ,Toxicokinetics ,Veterinary Sciences ,FUJIKUROI CULTURE MATERIAL ,human and animal risk assessment ,Mycotoxin ,VLAG ,Cardiotoxicity ,[SDV.BA.MVSA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology/Veterinary medicine and animal Health ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,Chemical technology ,010401 analytical chemistry ,MON ,toxicity ,ASPARAGUS SPEARS ,PERFORMANCE ,0104 chemical sciences ,Scientific Opinion ,chemistry ,BROILER CHICKS ,Moniliformin ,exposure ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Parasitology ,Genotoxicity ,Food Science - Abstract
International audience; Moniliformin (MON) is a mycotoxin with low molecular weight primarily produced by Fusarium fungi and occurring predominantly in cereal grains. Following a request of the European Commission, the CONTAM Panel assessed the risk of MON to human and animal health related to its presence in food and feed. The limited information available on toxicity and on toxicokinetics in experimental and farm animals indicated haematotoxicity and cardiotoxicity as major adverse health effects of MON. MON causes chromosome aberrations in vitro but no in vivo genotoxicity data and no carcinogenicity data were identified. Due to the limitations in the available toxicity data, human acute or chronic health-based guidance values (HBGV) could not be established. The margin of exposure (MOE) between the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 6.0 mg/kg body weight (bw) for cardiotoxicity from a subacute study in rats and the acute upper bound (UB) dietary exposure estimates ranged between 4,000 and 73,000. The MOE between the lowest benchmark dose lower confidence limit (for a 5% response-BMDL 05) of 0.20 mg MON/kg bw per day for haematological hazards from a 28-day study in pigs and the chronic dietary human exposure estimates ranged between 370 and 5,000,000 for chronic dietary exposures. These MOEs indicate a low risk for human health but were associated with high uncertainty. The toxicity data available for poultry, pigs, and mink indicated a low or even negligible risk for these animals from exposure to MON in feed at the estimated exposure levels under current feeding practices. Assuming similar or lower sensitivity as for pigs, the CONTAM Panel considered a low or even negligible risk for the other animal species for which no toxicity data suitable for hazard characterisation were identified. Additional toxicity studies are needed and depending on their outcome, the collection of more occurrence data on MON in food and feed is recommended to enable a comprehensive human risk assessment.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Compendium of Food Additive Specifications. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 86th Meeting June 2018
- Author
-
Barlow, S., Bend, J., Benford, D., Cantrill, R., Folmer, D., Mattia, A., Mueller, U., Orisakwe, O. E., Schlatter, J., Smith, J., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Bruno, A., Andersen, J. H., Barrows, J. N., Béchaux, C., Dinovi, M., Fallico, B., Fan, Y., Fernandez, M. J. F., Fields, B., Hambridge, T., Hill, F., Jeurissen, S. M. F., Jia, X., Kim, S., Laurvick, K., Lipp, M., Mosesso, P., Odrowaz, J., Petersen, K., Rosenfeld, L., Rotstein, J., Srinivasan, J. R., Sugimoto, N., Takasu, S., Tritscher, A., Umemura, T., Yang, X., and L. Zhang.
- Subjects
food additives ,food safety ,evaluation ,drug residues ,chemical composition ,drugs ,chemical composition, drug residues, drugs, evaluation, food additives, food safety - Published
- 2018
6. Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated and modified forms in food and feed
- Author
-
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Knutsen, HK, Alexander, J, Barregård, L, Bignami, M, Brüschweiler, B, Ceccatelli, S, Cottrill, B, Dinovi, M, Grasl‐Kraupp, B, Hogstrand, C, Hoogenboom, LR, Nebbia, CS, Oswald, IP, Petersen, A, Rose, M, Roudot, A-C, Schwerdtle, T, Vleminckx, C, Vollmer, G, Wallace, H, De Saeger, S, Eriksen, GS, Farmer, P, Fremy, J-M, Gong, YY, Meyer, K, Naegeli, H, Parent‐Massin, D, Rietjens, I, van Egmond, H, Altieri, A, Eskola, M, Gergelova, P, Ramos Bordajandi, L, Benkova, B, Dörr, B, Gkrillas, A, Gustavsson, N, van Manen, M, and Edler, L
- Subjects
food and beverages - Abstract
Deoxynivalenol (DON) is a mycotoxin primarily produced by Fusarium fungi, occurring predominantly in cereal grains. Following the request of the European Commission, the CONTAM Panel assessed the risk to animal and human health related to DON, 3-acetyl-DON (3-Ac-DON), 15-acetyl-DON (15-Ac-DON) and DON-3-glucoside in food and feed. A total of 27,537, 13,892, 7,270 and 2,266 analytical data for DON, 3-Ac-DON, 15-Ac-DON and DON-3-glucoside, respectively, in food, feed and unprocessed grains collected from 2007 to 2014 were used. For human exposure, grains and grain-based products were main sources, whereas in farm and companion animals, cereal grains, cereal by-products and forage maize contributed most. DON is rapidly absorbed, distributed, and excreted. Since 3-Ac-DON and 15-Ac-DON are largely deacetylated and DON-3-glucoside cleaved in the intestines the same toxic effects as DON can be expected. The TDI of 1 μg/kg bw per day, that was established for DON based on reduced body weight gain in mice, was therefore used as a group-TDI for the sum of DON, 3-Ac-DON, 15-Ac-DON and DON-3-glucoside. In order to assess acute human health risk, epidemiological data from mycotoxicoses were assessed and a group-ARfD of 8 μg/kg bw per eating occasion was calculated. Estimates of acute dietary exposures were below this dose and did not raise a health concern in humans. The estimated mean chronic dietary exposure was above the group-TDI in infants, toddlers and other children, and at high exposure also in adolescents and adults, indicating a potential health concern. Based on estimated mean dietary concentrations in ruminants, poultry, rabbits, dogs and cats, most farmed fish species and horses, adverse effects are not expected. At the high dietary concentrations, there is a potential risk for chronic adverse effects in pigs and fish and for acute adverse effects in cats and farmed mink.
- Published
- 2017
7. Evaluation of certain food additives: eighty-fourth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives
- Author
-
Barlow, S., Bend, J., Benford, D., Cantrill, R., Dessipri, E., Dinovi, M., Folmer, D., Mattia, A., Mueller, U., Orisakwe, O. E., Smith, J., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Yoon, H. J., Andersen, J. H., Barrows, J. N., Boon, P., Bruno, A., Choi, M., Dejager, L., Fallico, B., Fan, Y., Fattori, V., Gürtler, R., Hallstrom, H., Jia, X., Kim, S., Lambré, C., Laurvick, K., Leblanc, J. C., Lipp, M., Muldoon Jacobs, K., Mulholland, C., Odrowaz, J., Petersen, K., Rosenfeld, L., Rotstein, J., Sheffer, M., Srinivasan, J. R., Tada, A., Tritscher, A., Umemura, T., Yamamoto, R., Yang, X., and Zhang, L.
- Subjects
BRILLIANT BLUE FCF ,15'-DIOXYGENASE ACTIVITYT ,FD-AND-C ,CAROTENE 15 ,CAROTENE 15,15'-DIOXYGENASE ACTIVITYT - Published
- 2017
8. Compendium of food additive specifications, Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 84th Meeting 2017
- Author
-
Barlow, S., Bend, J., Benford, D., Cantrill, R., Dessipri, E., Dinovi, M., Folmer, D., Mattia, A., Mueller, U., Orisakwe, O. E., Smith, J., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Yoon, H. J., Andersen, J. H., Barrows, J. N., Boon, P., Bruno, A., Choi, M., Dejager, L., Fallico, B., Fan, Y., Fattori, V., Gürtler, R., Hallstrom, H., Jia, X., Kim, S., Lambré, C., Laurvick, K., Leblanc, J. C., Lipp, M., Muldoon Jacobs, K., Mulholland, C., Odrowaz, J., Petersen, K., Rosenfeld, L., Rotstein, J., Sheffer, M., Srinivasan, J. R., Tada, A., Tritscher, A., Umemura, T., Yamamoto, R., Yang, X., and Zhang, L.
- Subjects
food additives ,safety ,impact assessment - Published
- 2017
9. Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic
- Author
-
Benford, D., Bolger, P.M., Carthew, P., Coulet, M., DiNovi, M., Leblanc, J.C., Renwick, A.G., Setzer, W., Schlatter, J., Smith, B., Slob, W., Williams, G., Wildemann, T., Risk Assessment of Toxic and Immunomodulatory Agents, Dep IRAS, Risk Assessment of Toxic and Immunomodulatory Agents, and Dep IRAS
- Subjects
Computer science ,Food Contamination ,World Health Organization ,Toxicology ,Risk Assessment ,Human health ,Humans ,Carcinogenic chemicals ,Risk management ,Models, Statistical ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,business.industry ,Dietary exposure ,Uncertainty ,General Medicine ,Reference Standards ,Food safety ,Expert group ,Margin of exposure ,Europe ,Risk analysis (engineering) ,Carcinogens ,business ,Risk assessment ,Mutagens ,Food Science - Abstract
This paper presents the work of an expert group established by the International Life Sciences Institute - European branch (ILSI Europe) to follow up the recommendations of an international conference on "Risk Assessment of Compounds that are both Genotoxic and Carcinogenic: New Approaches". Twelve genotoxic and carcinogenic chemicals that can be present in food were selected for calculation of a Margin of Exposure (MOE) between a point of departure on the dose-response for oral carcinogenicity in animal studies and estimates of human dietary exposure. The MOE can be used to support prioritisation of risk management action and, if the MOE is very large, on communication of a low level of human health concern. Depending on the approaches taken in determining the point of departure and the estimation of exposure, it is possible to derive very different values for the MOE. It is therefore essential that the selection of the cancer endpoint and mathematical treatment of the data are clearly described and justified if the results of the MOE approach are to be trusted and of value to risk managers. An outline framework for calculating an MOE is proposed in order to help to ensure transparency in the results.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Lipase from Fusarium heterosporum expressed in Ogataea polymorpha
- Author
-
Zang, Y., Andersen, Jens Hinge, Dessipri, E., DiNovi, M., Meyland, Inge, and Mueller, U.
- Published
- 2016
11. Mixed β-glucanase and xylanase from Disporotrichum dimorphosporum
- Author
-
Jeurissen, S. M. F., Andersen, Jens Hinge, DiNovi, M., Mattia, A., Meyland, Inge, and Srinivasan, J. R.
- Published
- 2016
12. Mixed β-glucanase, cellulase and xylanase from Rasamsonia emersonii
- Author
-
Jeurissen, S. M. F., Andersen, Jens Hinge, DiNovi, M., Mattia, A., Meyland, Inge, and Srinivasan, J. R.
- Published
- 2016
13. Maltotetraohydrolase from Pseudomonas stutzeri expressed in Bacillus licheniformis
- Author
-
Zang, Y., Andersen, Jens Hinge, DiNovi, M., Meyland, Inge, Mueller, U., and Srinivasan, J. R.
- Published
- 2016
14. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) – polyethylene glycol (PEG) graft copolymer
- Author
-
Jeurissen, S. M. F., Andersen, Jens Hinge, DiNovi, M., Folmer, D. E., Schlatter, J., and Wallin, H.
- Published
- 2016
15. Magnesium stearate
- Author
-
Mueller, U., Yang, Xingfen, Andersen, Jens Hinge, DiNovi, M., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Schlatter, J., and Stankovic, I.
- Published
- 2016
16. Evaluation of certain food additives
- Author
-
Bend, J.R, El-Samragy, Y, Kawamura, Y, Knaap, A, Kuznesof, P.M, Larsen, J.C, Mattia, A, Meyland, I, Pascal, G, Rao, M.V, Schlatter, J, Verger, P, Wallin, H, Whitehouse, D.B., Abbott, P.J, Bruno, A, Cantrill, R.C, Charrondiere, R, Costarrica, M.De.L, DiNovi, M, Fisher, C.E., Lawrie, C.A, Leclercq, C, Moy, G, Munro, I.C, Nishikawa, A, Page, S, Pronk, I.M.E.J, Renwick, A.G, Sipes, I.G, Soares, L.M.V, Stanković, Ivan, Tritscher, A, Valerio Jr, and Williams, G.M
- Published
- 2005
17. WHO Technical Report Series: Evaluation of certain food additives
- Author
-
Bend, J.R, Hattan, D.G, Kawamura, Y, Knaap, A.G.A.C, Kuznesof, P.M, Larsen, J.C, Meyland, I, Rao, M.V, Schlatter, J, De Figueiredo Toledo, M.C, Vavasour, E, Verger, P, Walker, R, Abbott, P.J, Archer, M.C, Azanza, Ma.P.V, Benford, D, Cantrill, R, De Lourdes Costarrica, M, Das, M, DiNovi, M, El-Samragy, Y, Hanley, A.B, Ishiwata, H, Kayama, F, Kroes, R, Lawrie, S, Leclercq, C, Lützow, M, Mattia, A, Moy, G, Munro, I.C, Nishikawa, A, Olempska-Beer, Z, Page, S, Pronk, I.M.E.J, Renwick, A.G, Saxena, S.K., Sipes, I.G, Smith, J, Stanković, Ivan, Tritscher, A, De Veer, A, Wallin, H, Whitehouse, D.B., and Williams, G
- Published
- 2005
18. Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic.
- Author
-
Risk Assessment of Toxic and Immunomodulatory Agents, Dep IRAS, Benford, D., Bolger, P.M., Carthew, P., Coulet, M., DiNovi, M., Leblanc, J.C., Renwick, A.G., Setzer, W., Schlatter, J., Smith, B., Slob, W., Williams, G., Wildemann, T., Risk Assessment of Toxic and Immunomodulatory Agents, Dep IRAS, Benford, D., Bolger, P.M., Carthew, P., Coulet, M., DiNovi, M., Leblanc, J.C., Renwick, A.G., Setzer, W., Schlatter, J., Smith, B., Slob, W., Williams, G., and Wildemann, T.
- Published
- 2010
19. WHO Technical Report Series: Evaluation of certain food additives
- Author
-
Bend, J. R., Hattan, D. G., Kawamura, Y., Knaap, A. G. A. C., Kuznesof, P. M., Larsen, J. C., Meyland, I., Rao, M. V., Schlatter, J., Figueiredo Toledo, M. C., Vavasour, E., Verger, P., Walker, R., Abbott, P. J., Archer, M. C., Azanza, Ma P. V., Benford, D., Cantrill, R., Lourdes Costarrica, M., Das, M., Dinovi, M., El-Samragy, Y., Hanley, A. B., Ishiwata, H., Kayama, F., Kroes, R., Lawrie, S., Catherine Leclercq, Lützow, M., Mattia, A., Moy, G., Munro, I. C., Nishikawa, A., Olempska-Beer, Z., Page, S., Pronk, I. M. E. J., Renwick, A. G., Saxena, S. K., Sipes, I. G., Smith, J., Stankovic, I., Tritscher, A., Veer, A., Wallin, H., Whitehouse, D. B., and Williams, G.
20. Sixty-seventh meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives: Rome, 20-29 June 2006
- Author
-
Adegoke, G., Bend, J., Bolger, M., Kawamura, Y., Knaap, A. G. A. C., Kuznesof, P. M., Larsen, J. C., Mattia, A., Meyland, I., Rao, M. V., Schlatter, J., Verger, P., Walker, R., Wallin, H., Whitehouse, B., Barlow, S., Benford, D., Charrondiere, R., Costarrica, M. L., Veer, A., Dinovi, M., Fisher, C. E., Kayama, F., Kroes, R., Lawrie, S., jean-charles leblanc, Leclercq, C., Moy, G., Munro, I. C., Nishikawa, A., Olempska-Beer, Z., Petersen, B., Pronk, M. E. J., Schelling, N., Renwick, A. G., Schneider, K., Smith, J., Street, D. A., Tritscher, A., Valente Soares, L., Wennberg, A., and Williams, G. M.
21. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants
- Author
-
Fisher, C. E., Hattan, D. G., Kawamura, Y., Kuznesof, P. M., Meyland, I., Pascal, G., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Schlatter, J., Speijers, G. J. A., Vavasour, E., Philippe Verger, Walker, R., Wallin, H., Whitehouse, D. B., Abbott, P. J., Bellinger, D. C., Benford, D., Brooke-Taylor, S., Cantrill, R. C., Dinovi, M., Egan, S. K., Ehara, T., Fawell, J., Feeley, M., Kayama, F., Kroes, R., Lawrie, C. A., Leclercq, C., Viñuela, E. L., Luetzow, M., Mattia, A., Mattock, H., Moreau, G., Moy, G., Munro, I. C., Nishikawa, A., Olempska-Beer, Z., Page, S., and Pronk, I. M. E. J.
22. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants
- Author
-
Chen, J., Dagher, S. M., Fisher, C. E., Grunow, W., Hattan, D. G., Kawamura, Y., Knaap, A. G. A. C., Kuznesof, P. C., Larsen, J. C., Meyland, I., Pascal, G., Riordan, M., Walker, R., Wilson, J. D., Abbott, P. J., Akkelidou, D., Bellinger, D. C., Bolger, M., Carrington, C., Dewailly, E., Dinovi, M., Eriksen, G. S., Greig, J., Hecker, E. F. F., Herrman, J. L., Hotchkiss, J. H., Madsen, C., Magos, L. P. A., Mattia, A., Moy, G., Munro, I. C., Nishikawa, A., Pennington, J. A., Petersen, B., Renwick, A. G., Resnik, S., Schaltter, J., Sipes, G. I., Speijers, G. J. A., Vavasour, E., Philippe Verger, Vilu, R., Wallin, H., Weatherwax, J., and Whitehouse, D. B.
23. Evaluation of certain food additives
- Author
-
Bend, J. R., El-Samragy, Y., Kawamura, Y., Knaap, A., Kuznesof, P. M., Larsen, J. C., Mattia, A., Meyland, I., Pascal, G., Rao, M. V., Schlatter, J., Verger, P., Wallin, H., Whitehouse, D. B., Abbott, P. J., Bruno, A., Cantrill, R. C., Charrondiere, R., Costarrica, M. L., Dinovi, M., Fisher, C. E., Lawrie, C. A., Catherine Leclercq, Moy, G., Munro, I. C., Nishikawa, A., Page, S., Pronk, I. M. E. J., Renwick, A. G., Sipes, I. G., Soares, L. M. V., Stankovic, I., Tritscher, A., Valerio Jr, L. G., and Williams, G. M.
24. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants
- Author
-
Bend, J., Bolger, M., Knaap, A. G. A. C., Kuznesof, P. M., Larsen, J. C., Mattia, A., Meyland, I., Pitt, J. I., Resnik, S., Schlatter, J., Vavasour, E., Veerabhadra Rao, M., Verger, P., Walker, R., Wallin, H., Whitehouse, B., Abbott, P. J., Adegoke, G., Baan, R., Baines, J., Barlow, S., Benford, D., Bruno, A., Charrondiere, R., Chen, J., Choi, M., Dinovi, M., Fisher, C. E., Iseki, N., Kawamura, Y., Konishi, Y., Lawrie, S., jean-charles leblanc, Leclercq, C., Lee, H. -M, Moy, G., Munro, I. C., Nishikawa, A., Olempska-Beer, Z., Peuter, G., Pronk, M. E. J., Renwick, A. G., Sheffer, M., Sipes, I. G., Tritscher, A., Valente Soares, L., Wennberg, A., and Williams, G. M.
25. Structural functions of taste in 5-membered ring structures
- Author
-
Shamil, S., primary, Birch, G.G., additional, Dinovi, M., additional, and Rafka, R., additional
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. ChemInform Abstract: Biogenetically-Modelled Total Syntheses (-)-Nocardicin A (I) and (-)-Nocardicin G (II).
- Author
-
TOWNSEND, C. A., primary, SALITURO, G. M., additional, NGUYEN, L. T., additional, and DINOVI, M. J., additional
- Published
- 1986
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. 2,5-anhydro-D-mannitol: a fructose analogue that increases food intake in rats
- Author
-
Tordoff, M. G., primary, Rafka, R., additional, DiNovi, M. J., additional, and Friedman, M. I., additional
- Published
- 1988
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. ChemInform Abstract: THE STRUCTURE OF PB‐1, AN UNUSUAL TOXIN ISOLATED FROM THE RED TIDE DINOFLAGELLATE PTYCHODISCUS BREVIS
- Author
-
DINOVI, M., primary, TRAINOR, D. A., additional, NAKANISHI, K., additional, SANDUJA, R., additional, and ALAM, M., additional
- Published
- 1983
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Workshop report: A study roadmap to evaluate the safety of recombinant human lactoferrin expressed in Komagataella phaffii intended as an ingredient in conventional foods - Recommendations of a scientific expert panel.
- Author
-
Malinczak CA, Burns Naas LA, Clark A, Conze D, DiNovi M, Kaminski N, Kruger C, Lönnerdal B, Lukacs NW, Merker R, and Peterson R
- Subjects
- Humans, Animals, Food Safety, Saccharomycetales genetics, Saccharomycetales metabolism, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States, Cattle, Food Ingredients, Lactoferrin, Recombinant Proteins toxicity
- Abstract
Human milk lactoferrin (hmLF) is a glycoprotein with well-known effects on immune function. Helaina Inc. has used a glycoengineered yeast, Komatagaella phaffii, to produce recombinant human lactoferrin (Helaina rhLF, Effera™) that is structurally similar to hmLF with intended uses as a food ingredient. However, earlier FDA reviews of rhLF were withdrawn due to insufficient safety data and unanswered safety questions the experts and FDA raised about the immunogenicity/immunotoxicity risks of orally ingested rhLF. Helaina organized a panel of leading scientists to build and vet a safety study roadmap containing the studies and safety endpoints needed to address these questions. Panelists participated in a one-day virtual workshop in June 2023 and ensuing discussions through July 2023. Relevant workshop topics included physicochemical properties of LF, regulatory history of bovine LF and rhLF as food ingredients in the FDA's generally recognized as safe (GRAS) program, and synopses of publicly available studies on the immunogenicity/alloimmunization, immunotoxicology, iron homeostasis, and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of rhLF. Panelists concluded that the safety study roadmap addresses the unanswered safety questions and the intended safe use of rhLF as a food ingredient for adults and agreed on broad applications of the roadmap to assess the safety and support GRAS of other recombinant milk proteins with immunomodulatory functions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Carrie-Anne Malinczak, Anthony Clark, and Ross Peterson are employees of Helaina Inc. Leigh Ann Burns Naas, Michael DiNovi, Norbert Kaminski, Bo Lönnerdal, and Robert Merker have received honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Helaina Inc. Dietrich Conze and Claire Kruger are employed by Spherix and have received paid consultancy from Helaina Inc., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Acrylamide levels and dietary exposure from foods in the United States, an update based on 2011-2015 data.
- Author
-
Abt E, Robin LP, McGrath S, Srinivasan J, DiNovi M, Adachi Y, and Chirtel S
- Subjects
- Humans, Infant, United States, Acrylamide analysis, Dietary Exposure analysis, Food Analysis, Food Contamination analysis, Infant Food analysis
- Abstract
Acrylamide is a contaminant that can form in certain plant-based foods during high-temperature cooking. From 2011-2015, the Food and Drug Administration conducted extensive sampling and analyses of acrylamide in foods, as a follow-up to surveys from 2002-2006. We compared acrylamide occurrence data and exposure estimates based on 2011-2015 data with data and exposure estimates from 2002-2006. Acrylamide levels in selected food categories generally did not decrease significantly in 2011-2015 compared with 2002-2006. However, significant decreases in acrylamide concentrations were observed for potato chips and crackers, which may be related to the availability and use of mitigation techniques for reducing acrylamide in foods. Mean dietary intake for those 2 years and older based on 2011-2015 data was 0.36 µg/kg bw/day, comparable to the 0.44 µg/kg bw/day reported by FDA in 2006. French fries and potato products, breakfast cereal, cookies, potato chips, and crackers continue to be the greatest contributors to dietary intake of acrylamide. Infant snack foods were identified as an important contributor to acrylamide intake relative to infant jarred foods. The continued presence of acrylamide in food suggests that manufacturers and governments should continue to pursue efforts to reduce acrylamide in foods that are important contributors to acrylamide intake.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid in food.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Bodin L, Cravedi JP, Halldorsson TI, Haug LS, Johansson N, van Loveren H, Gergelova P, Mackay K, Levorato S, van Manen M, and Schwerdtle T
- Abstract
The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific evaluation on the risks to human health related to the presence of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in food. Regarding PFOS and PFOA occurrence, the final data set available for dietary exposure assessment contained a total of 20,019 analytical results (PFOS n = 10,191 and PFOA n = 9,828). There were large differences between upper and lower bound exposure due to analytical methods with insufficient sensitivity. The CONTAM Panel considered the lower bound estimates to be closer to true exposure levels. Important contributors to the lower bound mean chronic exposure were 'Fish and other seafood', 'Meat and meat products' and 'Eggs and egg products', for PFOS, and 'Milk and dairy products', 'Drinking water' and 'Fish and other seafood' for PFOA. PFOS and PFOA are readily absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, excreted in urine and faeces, and do not undergo metabolism. Estimated human half-lives for PFOS and PFOA are about 5 years and 2-4 years, respectively. The derivation of a health-based guidance value was based on human epidemiological studies. For PFOS, the increase in serum total cholesterol in adults, and the decrease in antibody response at vaccination in children were identified as the critical effects. For PFOA, the increase in serum total cholesterol was the critical effect. Also reduced birth weight (for both compounds) and increased prevalence of high serum levels of the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (for PFOA) were considered. After benchmark modelling of serum levels of PFOS and PFOA, and estimating the corresponding daily intakes, the CONTAM Panel established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 13 ng/kg body weight (bw) per week for PFOS and 6 ng/kg bw per week for PFOA. For both compounds, exposure of a considerable proportion of the population exceeds the proposed TWIs., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Risk for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in feed and food.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Fürst P, Håkansson H, Halldorsson T, Lundebye AK, Pohjanvirta R, Rylander L, Smith A, van Loveren H, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Zeilmaker M, Binaglia M, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Horváth Z, Christoph E, Ciccolallo L, Ramos Bordajandi L, Steinkellner H, and Hoogenboom LR
- Abstract
The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL-PCBs in feed and food. The data from experimental animal and epidemiological studies were reviewed and it was decided to base the human risk assessment on effects observed in humans and to use animal data as supportive evidence. The critical effect was on semen quality, following pre- and postnatal exposure. The critical study showed a NOAEL of 7.0 pg WHO
2005 -TEQ/g fat in blood sampled at age 9 years based on PCDD/F-TEQs. No association was observed when including DL-PCB-TEQs. Using toxicokinetic modelling and taking into account the exposure from breastfeeding and a twofold higher intake during childhood, it was estimated that daily exposure in adolescents and adults should be below 0.25 pg TEQ/kg bw/day. The CONTAM Panel established a TWI of 2 pg TEQ/kg bw/week. With occurrence and consumption data from European countries, the mean and P95 intake of total TEQ by Adolescents, Adults, Elderly and Very Elderly varied between, respectively, 2.1 to 10.5, and 5.3 to 30.4 pg TEQ/kg bw/week, implying a considerable exceedance of the TWI. Toddlers and Other Children showed a higher exposure than older age groups, but this was accounted for when deriving the TWI. Exposure to PCDD/F-TEQ only was on average 2.4- and 2.7-fold lower for mean and P95 exposure than for total TEQ. PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs are transferred to milk and eggs, and accumulate in fatty tissues and liver. Transfer rates and bioconcentration factors were identified for various species. The CONTAM Panel was not able to identify reference values in most farm and companion animals with the exception of NOAELs for mink, chicken and some fish species. The estimated exposure from feed for these species does not imply a risk., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Risk to human and animal health related to the presence of 4,15-diacetoxyscirpenol in food and feed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, De Saeger S, Eriksen GS, Farmer P, Fremy JM, Gong YY, Meyer K, Parent-Massin D, van Egmond H, Altieri A, Colombo P, Horváth Z, Levorato S, and Edler L
- Abstract
4,15-Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) is a mycotoxin primarily produced by Fusarium fungi and occurring predominantly in cereal grains. As requested by the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) assessed the risk of DAS to human and animal health related to its presence in food and feed. Very limited information was available on toxicity and on toxicokinetics in experimental and farm animals. Due to the limitations in the available data set, human acute and chronic health-based guidance values (HBGV) were established based on data obtained in clinical trials of DAS as an anticancer agent (anguidine) after intravenous administration to cancer patients. The CONTAM Panel considered these data as informative for the hazard characterisation of DAS after oral exposure. The main adverse effects after acute and repeated exposure were emesis, with a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 32 μg DAS/kg body weight (bw), and haematotoxicity, with a NOAEL of 65 μg DAS/kg bw, respectively. An acute reference dose (ARfD) of 3.2 μg DAS/kg bw and a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 0.65 μg DAS/kg bw were established. Based on over 15,000 occurrence data, the highest acute and chronic dietary exposures were estimated to be 0.8 and 0.49 μg DAS/kg bw per day, respectively, and were not of health concern for humans. The limited information for poultry, pigs and dogs indicated a low risk for these animals at the estimated DAS exposure levels under current feeding practices, with the possible exception of fattening chicken. Assuming similar or lower sensitivity than for poultry, the risk was considered overall low for other farm and companion animal species for which no toxicity data were available. In consideration of the similarities of several trichothecenes and the likelihood of co-exposure via food and feed, it could be appropriate to perform a cumulative risk assessment for this group of substances., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Update: methodological principles and scientific methods to be taken into account when establishing Reference Points for Action (RPAs) for non-allowed pharmacologically active substances present in food of animal origin.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vollmer G, Vleminckx C, Wallace H, Filipič M, Fürst P, O'Keeffe M, Penninks A, Van Leeuwen R, Baert K, and Hoogenboom LR
- Abstract
EFSA was asked by the European Commission to update the Scientific Opinion on methodological principles and scientific methods to be taken into account when establishing Reference Points for Action (RPAs) for non-allowed pharmacologically active substances in food of animal origin. This guidance document presents a simple and pragmatic approach which takes into account both analytical and toxicological considerations. The RPA shall be based on the reasonably achievable lowest residue concentration that can unequivocally be determined by official control laboratories, i.e. the reasonably achievable lowest decision limit (CCα). The aim is to check whether this concentration is low enough to adequately protect the consumers of food commodities that contain that substance. The proposed step-wise approach applies toxicological screening values (TSVs), based on genotoxic potential, pharmacological activity, as well as other effects of the substance. The highest dietary exposure corresponding to the reasonably achievable lowest CCα for the substance has to be estimated and compared with the TSV. Where equal to or lower than the TSV, the reasonably achievable lowest CCα can be accepted as the RPA. If higher, the sensitivity of the analytical method needs to be improved. In the case where no further analytical improvements are feasible within a short to medium time frame, a substance-specific risk assessment should be considered. This also applies when the potential adverse effects do not allow use of the decision tree, as for high potency carcinogens, inorganic substances or compounds with allergenic effects or causing blood dyscrasias. The CONTAM Panel concluded that RPAs should be food matrix independent. RPAs cannot be applied to non-edible matrices, which are also monitored for non-allowed pharmacologically active substances., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Risks for animal health related to the presence of fumonisins, their modified forms and hidden forms in feed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Dall'Asta C, Eriksen GS, Taranu I, Altieri A, Roldán-Torres R, and Oswald IP
- Abstract
Fumonisins, mycotoxins primarily produced by Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium proliferatum , occur predominantly in cereal grains, especially in maize. The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risk to animal health related to fumonisins and their modified and hidden forms in feed. Fumonisin B
1 (FB1 ), FB2 and FB3 are the most common forms of fumonisins in feedstuffs and thus were included in the assessment. FB1 , FB2 and FB3 have the same mode of action and were considered as having similar toxicological profile and potencies. For fumonisins, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) identified no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for cattle, pig, poultry (chicken, ducks and turkeys), horse, and lowest-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs) for fish (extrapolated from carp) and rabbits. No reference points could be identified for sheep, goats, dogs, cats and mink. The dietary exposure was estimated on 18,140 feed samples on FB1-3 representing most of the feed commodities with potential presence of fumonisins. Samples were collected between 2003 and 2016 from 19 different European countries, but most of them from four Member States. To take into account the possible occurrence of hidden forms, an additional factor of 1.6, derived from the literature, was applied to the occurrence data. Modified forms of fumonisins, for which no data were identified concerning both the occurrence and the toxicity, were not included in the assessment. Based on mean exposure estimates, the risk of adverse health effects of feeds containing FB1-3 was considered very low for ruminants, low for poultry, horse, rabbits, fish and of potential concern for pigs. The same conclusions apply to the sum of FB1-3 and their hidden forms, except for pigs for which the risk of adverse health effect was considered of concern., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Update of the Scientific Opinion on opium alkaloids in poppy seeds.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Benford D, Calò G, Dahan A, Dusemund B, Mulder P, Németh-Zámboriné É, Arcella D, Baert K, Cascio C, Levorato S, Schutte M, and Vleminckx C
- Abstract
Poppy seeds are obtained from the opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). They are used as food and to produce edible oil. The opium poppy plant contains narcotic alkaloids such as morphine and codeine. Poppy seeds do not contain the opium alkaloids, but can become contaminated with alkaloids as a result of pest damage and during harvesting. The European Commission asked EFSA to provide an update of the Scientific Opinion on opium alkaloids in poppy seeds. The assessment is based on data on morphine, codeine, thebaine, oripavine, noscapine and papaverine in poppy seed samples. The CONTAM Panel confirms the acute reference dose (ARfD) of 10 μg morphine/kg body weight (bw) and concluded that the concentration of codeine in the poppy seed samples should be taken into account by converting codeine to morphine equivalents, using a factor of 0.2. The ARfD is therefore a group ARfD for morphine and codeine, expressed in morphine equivalents. Mean and high levels of dietary exposure to morphine equivalents from poppy seeds considered to have high levels of opium alkaloids (i.e. poppy seeds from varieties primarily grown for pharmaceutical use) exceed the ARfD in most age groups. For poppy seeds considered to have relatively low concentrations of opium alkaloids (i.e. primarily varieties for food use), some exceedance of the ARfD is also seen at high levels of dietary exposure in most surveys. For noscapine and papaverine, the available data do not allow making a hazard characterisation. However, comparison of the dietary exposure to the recommended therapeutical doses does not suggest a health concern for these alkaloids. For thebaine and oripavine, no risk characterisation was done due to insufficient data. However, for thebaine, limited evidence indicates a higher acute lethality than for morphine and the estimated exposure could present a health risk., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of moniliformin in food and feed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, De Saeger S, Eriksen GS, Farmer P, Fremy JM, Gong YY, Meyer K, Naegeli H, Parent-Massin D, van Egmond H, Altieri A, Colombo P, Eskola M, van Manen M, and Edler L
- Abstract
Moniliformin (MON) is a mycotoxin with low molecular weight primarily produced by Fusarium fungi and occurring predominantly in cereal grains. Following a request of the European Commission, the CONTAM Panel assessed the risk of MON to human and animal health related to its presence in food and feed. The limited information available on toxicity and on toxicokinetics in experimental and farm animals indicated haematotoxicity and cardiotoxicity as major adverse health effects of MON. MON causes chromosome aberrations in vitro but no in vivo genotoxicity data and no carcinogenicity data were identified. Due to the limitations in the available toxicity data, human acute or chronic health-based guidance values (HBGV) could not be established. The margin of exposure (MOE) between the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 6.0 mg/kg body weight (bw) for cardiotoxicity from a subacute study in rats and the acute upper bound (UB) dietary exposure estimates ranged between 4,000 and 73,000. The MOE between the lowest benchmark dose lower confidence limit (for a 5% response - BMDL
05 ) of 0.20 mg MON/kg bw per day for haematological hazards from a 28-day study in pigs and the chronic dietary human exposure estimates ranged between 370 and 5,000,000 for chronic dietary exposures. These MOEs indicate a low risk for human health but were associated with high uncertainty. The toxicity data available for poultry, pigs, and mink indicated a low or even negligible risk for these animals from exposure to MON in feed at the estimated exposure levels under current feeding practices. Assuming similar or lower sensitivity as for pigs, the CONTAM Panel considered a low or even negligible risk for the other animal species for which no toxicity data suitable for hazard characterisation were identified. Additional toxicity studies are needed and depending on their outcome, the collection of more occurrence data on MON in food and feed is recommended to enable a comprehensive human risk assessment., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Appropriateness to set a group health-based guidance value for fumonisins and their modified forms.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Dall'Asta C, Gutleb AC, Humpf HU, Galli C, Metzler M, Oswald IP, Parent-Massin D, Binaglia M, Steinkellner H, and Alexander J
- Abstract
The EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) established a tolerable daily intake (TDI) for fumonisin B
1 (FB1 ) of 1.0 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day based on increased incidence of megalocytic hepatocytes found in a chronic study with mice. The CONTAM Panel considered the limited data available on toxicity and mode of action and structural similarities of FB2-6 and found it appropriate to include FB2 , FB3 and FB4 in a group TDI with FB1 . Modified forms of FBs are phase I and phase II metabolites formed in fungi, infested plants or farm animals. Modified forms also arise from food or feed processing, and include covalent adducts with matrix constituents. Non-covalently bound forms are not considered as modified forms. Modified forms of FBs identified are hydrolysed FB1-4 (HFB1-4 ), partially hydrolysed FB1-2 (pHFB1-2 ), N -(carboxymethyl)-FB1-3 (NCM-FB1-3 ), N -(1-deoxy-d-fructos-1-yl)-FB1 (NDF-FB1 ), O -fatty acyl FB1 , N -fatty acyl FB1 and N -palmitoyl-HFB1 . HFB1 , pHFB1 , NCM-FB1 and NDF-FB1 show a similar toxicological profile but are less potent than FB1 . Although in vitro data shows that N -fatty acyl FBs are more toxic in vitro than FB1 , no in vivo data were available for N -fatty acyl FBs and O -fatty acyl FBs. The CONTAM Panel concluded that it was not appropriate to include modified FBs in the group TDI for FB1-4 . The uncertainty associated with the present assessment is high, but could be reduced provided more data are made available on occurrence, toxicokinetics and toxicity of FB2-6 and modified forms of FB1-4 ., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and PCBs from fish meal by hexane extraction and replacement of fish oil.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Lundebye AK, Metzler M, Colombo P, and Hogstrand C
- Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process for fish meal. This process entails solvent (hexane) extraction of fish oil from fish meal to remove dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo- p -dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) as well as dioxin-like (DL-) and non-dioxin-like (NDL-) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) followed by replacement with decontaminated fish oil. All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process, absence of solvent residues, and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the nature and characteristics of the product. According to data provided, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs by approximately 70% and NDL-PCBs by about 60%. The data showed that it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, provided that the level of contamination of untreated fish meal is within the range of the tested batches. It is unlikely that hazardous substances (i.e. hexane) remain in the final product. The Panel considered that there is no evidence that fish oil extraction followed by replacement with decontaminated fish oil leads to detrimental changes in the nutritional composition of the fish meal, although some beneficial constituents (e.g. lipophilic vitamins) might be depleted. The feed business operator submitted information to demonstrate safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and PCBs from fish meal by means of solvent extraction and fish oil replacement was assessed to be compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and PCBs from fish meal by replacement of fish oil.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Lundebye AK, Metzler M, Colombo P, and Hogstrand C
- Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process of fish meal. It consisted of extraction of the fish oil, filtration and adsorption with activated carbon, and replacement with decontaminated fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo- p -dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)), and dioxin-like (DL-) and non-dioxin-like (NDL-) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. Data provided by the feed business operator were assessed for efficacy of the process and to demonstrate that the process did not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. The process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (97%) and DL- and NDL-PCBs (93%). The fish meal produced complied with EU regulations for these contaminants. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the replacement of fish oil and the use of activated carbon to adsorb these contaminants does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish meal. However, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. oil-soluble vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and PCBs from the fish meal by oil extraction followed by replacement with decontaminated fish oil, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Effect on public health of a possible increase of the maximum level for 'aflatoxin total' from 4 to 10 μg/kg in peanuts and processed products thereof, intended for direct human consumption or use as an ingredient in foodstuffs.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Fürst P, Baert K, Cortiñas Abrahantes J, Dujardin B, Ferrini K, and Petersen A
- Abstract
EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion regarding the effect on public health of a possible increase of the maximum level (ML) for 'aflatoxin total' (AFT; sum of aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin B2, aflatoxin G1 and aflatoxin G2) from 4 to 10 μg/kg in peanuts and processed products thereof. Aflatoxins are genotoxic and cause hepatocellular carcinomas in humans. The Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) evaluated 8,085 samples of peanuts and 472 samples of peanut butter, with > 60% left-censored. The mean concentration of AFT in peanuts was 2.65/3.56 μg/kg (lower bound (LB)/upper bound (UB)) with a maximum of 1,429 μg/kg. The mean concentration in peanut butter was 1.47/1.92 μg/kg (LB/UB) with a maximum of 407 μg/kg. Peanut oil was not included since all data were left-censored and the ML does not apply for oil. Exposure was calculated for a 'Current ML' and 'Increased ML' scenario, and mean chronic exposure estimates for consumers only, amounted to 0.04-2.74 ng/kg body weight (bw) per day and 0.07-4.28 ng/kg bw per day, respectively. The highest exposures were calculated for adolescents and other children. The CONTAM Panel used the cancer potencies estimated by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives for the risk characterisation. Under the scenario of the current ML, the cancer risk was estimated to range between 0.001 and 0.213 aflatoxin-induced cancers per 100,000 person years. Under the scenario of the increased ML, it ranged between 0.001 and 0.333 aflatoxin-induced cancers per 100,000 person years. Comparing these data calculated under the current ML scenario with the yearly excess cancer risk of 0.014 shows a higher risk for consumers of peanuts and peanut butter in some surveys. The calculated cancer risks indicate that an increase of the ML would further increase the risk by a factor of 1.6-1.8., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Update of the risk assessment on 3-monochloropropane diol and its fatty acid esters.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Lampen A, Morris I, Piersma A, Schrenk D, Binaglia M, Levorato S, and Hogstrand C
- Abstract
The CONTAM Panel updated the assessment of the risks for human health related to the presence of 3-monochloropropane diol (3-MCPD) and its fatty acid esters in food published in 2016 in view of the scientific divergence identified in the establishment of the tolerable daily intake (TDI) in the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (FAO/WHO) report published in 2017. In this update, dose-response analysis was performed following the recent EFSA Scientific Committee guidance on the use of benchmark dose (BMD) approach in risk assessment, and a review of available data on developmental and reproduction toxicity was included. The outcome of this review indicates that in rats short-term exposure to 3-MCPD above 1 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day can induce reduced sperm motility associated with reduced male fecundity. Decreased sperm count and histopathological changes in the testis and epididymis were observed following longer treatment periods at higher doses. Regarding increased incidence kidney tubular hyperplasia, BMD analysis using model averaging resulted in a BMDL
10 of 0.20 mg/kg bw per day in male rats, which was selected as the new Reference Point (RP) for renal effects. For the effects on male fertility, decreased sperm motility was selected as the most sensitive relevant endpoint and a BMDL05 of 0.44 mg/kg bw per day was calculated. The RP for renal effects was considered to derive an updated group TDI of 2 μg/kg bw per day for 3-MCPD and its fatty acid esters and was considered protective also for effects on male fertility. The established TDI of 2 μg/kg bw per day is not exceeded in the adult population. A slight exceedance of the TDI was observed in the high consumers of the younger age groups and in particular for the scenarios on infants receiving formula only., (© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Assessment of decontamination processes for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Lundebye AK, Metzler M, Colombo P, and Hogstrand C
- Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of decontamination processes involving the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo- p -dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. Two feed business operators provided data on their respective decontamination processes, which were assessed in terms of the efficacy of the process and the absence of adverse effects in the nature and characteristics of the product after decontamination. The processes proved to be able to remove PCDD/Fs (82-95%) and DL-PCBs (26-45%) from the fish oil, depending on the process used by the business operator. Given that the level of contamination is within the range of the tested untreated fish oil, it is possible to meet EU requirements for these contaminants after decontamination. The CONTAM Panel considered both the evidence provided by one of the business operators and information in the available literature to conclude that the proposed processes do not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil. However, the process can deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that, on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operators, the proposed decontamination processes to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL-PCBs from the fish oil by means of activated carbon and physical filtration were compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Risks for public health related to the presence of furan and methylfurans in food.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Chipman K, De Meulenaer B, Dinovi M, Mennes W, Schlatter J, Schrenk D, Baert K, Dujardin B, and Wallace H
- Abstract
The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific evaluation on the risk to human health of the presence of furan and methylfurans (2-methylfuran, 3-methylfuran and 2,5-dimethylfuran) in food. They are formed in foods during thermal processing and can co-occur. Furans are produced from several precursors such as ascorbic acid, amino acids, carbohydrates, unsaturated fatty acids and carotenoids, and are found in a variety of foods including coffee and canned and jarred foods. Regarding furan occurrence, 17,056 analytical results were used in the evaluation. No occurrence data were received on methylfurans. The highest exposures to furan were estimated for infants, mainly from ready-to-eat meals. Grains and grain-based products contribute most for toddlers, other children and adolescents. In adults, elderly and very elderly, coffee is the main contributor to dietary exposure. Furan is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is found in highest amounts in the liver. It has a short half-life and is metabolised by cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) to the reactive metabolite, cis -but-2-ene-1,4-dialdehyde (BDA). BDA can bind covalently to amino acids, proteins and DNA. Furan is hepatotoxic in rats and mice with cholangiofibrosis in rats and hepatocellular adenomas/carcinomas in mice being the most prominent effects. There is limited evidence of chromosomal damage in vivo and a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanism. Clear evidence for indirect mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis include oxidative stress, gene expression alterations, epigenetic changes, inflammation and increased cell proliferation. The CONTAM Panel used a margin of exposure (MOE) approach for the risk characterisation using as a reference point a benchmark dose lower confidence limit for a benchmark response of 10% of 0.064 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for the incidence of cholangiofibrosis in the rat. The calculated MOEs indicate a health concern. This conclusion was supported by the calculated MOEs for the neoplastic effects., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Assessment of a decontamination process for hydrocyanic acid in linseed intended for use in animal feed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Lundebye AK, Metzler M, Colombo P, and Hogstrand C
- Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process for the enzymatic treatment and subsequent heating of linseed, in order to reduce the amount of hydrocyanic acid (HCN) present as cyanogenic glycosides. Specifically, it is required that the feed decontamination process is compliant with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015. With this aim, the CONTAM Panel assessed the data provided by the feed business operator with respect to the efficacy of the process to remove the contaminant from the linseed batches and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. The data enabled the Panel to conclude that in agreement with the literature the process was able to remove HCN by about 90%, and that it is possible to meet the current EU requirements for quality of linseed with respect to HCN, provided the level of contamination of untreated linseed would be within the range of the tested batches. The Panel noted that the amounts of other products formed during the enzymatic process and remaining in the treated material are not of toxicological concern. The experimental data provided by the feed business operator showed that the characteristics of linseed were not adversely affected by the decontamination process. The CONTAM Panel concluded that, on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator, the proposed decontamination process to remove HCN from linseed by means of enzymatic release and subsequent evaporation was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated and modified forms in food and feed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, De Saeger S, Eriksen GS, Farmer P, Fremy JM, Gong YY, Meyer K, Naegeli H, Parent-Massin D, Rietjens I, van Egmond H, Altieri A, Eskola M, Gergelova P, Ramos Bordajandi L, Benkova B, Dörr B, Gkrillas A, Gustavsson N, van Manen M, and Edler L
- Abstract
Deoxynivalenol (DON) is a mycotoxin primarily produced by Fusarium fungi, occurring predominantly in cereal grains. Following the request of the European Commission, the CONTAM Panel assessed the risk to animal and human health related to DON, 3-acetyl-DON (3-Ac-DON), 15-acetyl-DON (15-Ac-DON) and DON-3-glucoside in food and feed. A total of 27,537, 13,892, 7,270 and 2,266 analytical data for DON, 3-Ac-DON, 15-Ac-DON and DON-3-glucoside, respectively, in food, feed and unprocessed grains collected from 2007 to 2014 were used. For human exposure, grains and grain-based products were main sources, whereas in farm and companion animals, cereal grains, cereal by-products and forage maize contributed most. DON is rapidly absorbed, distributed, and excreted. Since 3-Ac-DON and 15-Ac-DON are largely deacetylated and DON-3-glucoside cleaved in the intestines the same toxic effects as DON can be expected. The TDI of 1 μg/kg bw per day, that was established for DON based on reduced body weight gain in mice, was therefore used as a group-TDI for the sum of DON, 3-Ac-DON, 15-Ac-DON and DON-3-glucoside. In order to assess acute human health risk, epidemiological data from mycotoxicoses were assessed and a group-ARfD of 8 μg/kg bw per eating occasion was calculated. Estimates of acute dietary exposures were below this dose and did not raise a health concern in humans. The estimated mean chronic dietary exposure was above the group-TDI in infants, toddlers and other children, and at high exposure also in adolescents and adults, indicating a potential health concern. Based on estimated mean dietary concentrations in ruminants, poultry, rabbits, dogs and cats, most farmed fish species and horses, adverse effects are not expected. At the high dietary concentrations, there is a potential risk for chronic adverse effects in pigs and fish and for acute adverse effects in cats and farmed mink., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Lundebye AK, Metzler M, Colombo P, and Hogstrand C
- Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo- p -dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. As described in scientific literature, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (84%) and DL-PCBs (55%), and therefore, it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, assuming that the level of contamination of untreated fish oil was within the range of the tested batches. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the use of activated carbon adsorption does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil; however, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL-PCBs from the fish oil by means of physical filtration with activated carbon, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Presence of free gossypol in whole cottonseed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Alexander J, Cottrill B, and Mackay K
- Abstract
The European Commission asked EFSA to assess information provided by the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, on the toxicity of free gossypol in relation to the use of whole cotton seed in feed for ruminants, in particular dairy cows, and, if necessary, to update the previous opinion of the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) on gossypol as an undesirable substance in animal feed. Gossypol is a polyphenolic compound that exists in a racemic mixture of (+)-gossypol and (-)-gossypol isomers. It occurs in free or (protein-) bound forms in cottonseeds. The most commonly used cottonseeds in feed are from Upland and Pima varieties. The Pima variety is considered more toxic due to a higher content of the (-)-gossypol isomer. Upland whole cottonseeds (WCS) are fed with no further processing (after delinting); Pima varieties normally undergo further processing (grinding or cracking). It is claimed that WCS have a greater retention time in the rumen, which results in an increased detoxifying activity, compared to a shorter ruminal retention time, in the case of cracked cottonseed or cottonseed meal products. Increased erythrocyte fragility has been observed in cows given WCS Upland varieties at similar exposure levels as those resulting from an inclusion rate of 10% of WCS containing gossypol at 7,000 mg/kg in feed - the maximum permitted level of gossypol in WCS suggested by the Spanish Delegation. The information from the Spanish delegation does not differentiate between varieties in their suggestion for an increase in the maximum permitted content of free gossypol for WCS. As both Upland and Pima varieties are grown in the EU and are used for animal feed, both varieties of WCS should be considered. The CONTAM Panel considered it not necessary to update the previous opinion., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Risks for animal health related to the presence of zearalenone and its modified forms in feed.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Dall'Asta C, Dänicke S, Eriksen GS, Altieri A, Roldán-Torres R, and Oswald IP
- Abstract
Zearalenone (ZEN), a mycotoxin primarily produced by Fusarium fungi, occurs predominantly in cereal grains. The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risk to animal health related to ZEN and its modified forms in feed. Modified forms of ZEN occurring in feed include phase I metabolites α-zearalenol (α-ZEL), β-zearalenol (β-ZEL), α-zearalanol (α-ZAL), β-zearalanol (β-ZAL), zearalanone (ZAN) and phase II conjugates. ZEN has oestrogenic activity and the oestrogenic activity of the modified forms of ZEN differs considerably. For ZEN, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) established no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) for pig (piglets and gilts), poultry (chicken and fattening turkeys), sheep and fish (extrapolated from carp) and lowest observed effect level (LOAEL) for dogs. No reference points could be established for cattle, ducks, goats, horses, rabbits, mink and cats. For modified forms, no reference points could be established for any animal species and relative potency factors previously established from rodents by the CONTAM Panel in 2016 were used. The dietary exposure was estimated on 17,706 analytical results with high proportions of left-censored data (ZEN about 60%, ZAN about 70%, others close to 100%). Samples for ZEN were collected between 2001 and 2015 in 25 different European countries, whereas samples for the modified forms were collected mostly between 2013 and 2015 from three Member States. Based on exposure estimates, the risk of adverse health effects of feed containing ZEN was considered extremely low for poultry and low for sheep, dog, pig and fish. The same conclusions also apply to the sum of ZEN and its modified forms., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Risks for human health related to the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey, tea, herbal infusions and food supplements.
- Author
-
Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Hoogenboom LR, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Gomez Ruiz JA, and Binaglia M
- Abstract
EFSA was asked by the European Commission to deliver a scientific opinion on the risks for human health related to the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) in honey, tea, herbal infusions and food supplements and to identify the PAs of relevance in the aforementioned food commodities and in other feed and food. PAs are a large group of toxins produced by different plant species. In 2011, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) assessed the risks related to the presence of PAs in food and feed. Based on occurrence data limited to honey, the CONTAM Panel concluded that there was a possible health concern for those toddlers and children who are high consumers of honey. A new exposure assessment including new occurrence data was published by EFSA in 2016 and was used to update the risk characterisation. The CONTAM Panel established a new Reference Point of 237 μg/kg body weight per day to assess the carcinogenic risks of PAs, and concluded that there is a possible concern for human health related to the exposure to PAs, in particular for frequent and high consumers of tea and herbal infusions. The Panel noted that consumption of food supplements based on PA-producing plants could result in exposure levels too close (i.e. less than 100 times lower) to the range of doses known to cause severe acute/short term toxicity. From the analysis of the available occurrence data, the CONTAM Panel identified a list of 17 PAs of relevance for monitoring in food and feed. The Panel recommended continuing the efforts to monitor the presence of PAs in food and feed, including the development of more sensitive and specific analytical methods. A recommendation was also issued on the generation of data to identify the toxic and carcinogenic potency of the PAs commonly found in food., (© 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.