Background: The primary analysis of the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial showed significant improvement in progression-free survival with 177 Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting octreotide versus high-dose long-acting octreotide alone in patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumours. Here, we report the prespecified final analysis of overall survival and long-term safety results., Methods: This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial enrolled patients from 41 sites in eight countries across Europe and the USA. Patients were 18 years and older with locally advanced or metastatic, well differentiated, somatostatin receptor-positive midgut neuroendocrine tumours (Karnofsky performance status score ≥60) and disease progression on fixed-dose long-acting octreotide. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web-based response system to intravenous 177 Lu-Dotatate 7·4 GBq (200 mCi) every 8 weeks (four cycles) plus intramuscular long-acting octreotide 30 mg ( 177 Lu-Dotatate group) or high-dose long-acting octreotide 60 mg every 4 weeks (control group). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival has been previously reported; here, we report the key secondary endpoint of overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Final overall survival analysis was prespecified to occur either after 158 deaths or 5 years after the last patient was randomised, whichever occurred first. During long-term follow-up, adverse events of special interest were reported in the 177 Lu-Dotatate group only. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01578239., Findings: From Sept 6, 2012, to Jan 14, 2016, 231 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned for treatment. The prespecified final analysis occurred 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned (when 142 deaths had occurred); median follow-up was 76·3 months (range 0·4-95·0) in the 177 Lu-Dotatate group and 76·5 months (0·1-92·3) in the control group. The secondary endpoint of overall survival was not met: median overall survival was 48·0 months (95% CI 37·4-55·2) in the 177 Lu-Dotatate group and 36·3 months (25·9-51·7) in the control group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·60-1·17]; two-sided p=0·30). During long-term follow-up, treatment-related serious adverse events of grade 3 or worse were recorded in three (3%) of 111 patients in the 177 Lu-Dotatate group, but no new treatment-related serious adverse events were reported after the safety analysis cutoff. Two (2%) of 111 patients given 177 Lu-Dotatate developed myelodysplastic syndrome, one of whom died 33 months after randomisation (this person was the only the only reported 177 Lu-Dotatate treatment-related death). No new cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were reported during long-term follow-up., Interpretation: 177 Lu-Dotatate treatment did not significantly improve median overall survival versus high-dose long-acting octreotide. Despite final overall survival not reaching statistical significance, the 11·7 month difference in median overall survival with 177 Lu-Dotatate treatment versus high-dose long-acting octreotide alone might be considered clinically relevant. No new safety signals were reported during long-term follow-up., Funding: Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis company., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JRS has provided consulting or advisory services for Novartis, speakers bureau services for Ipsen, Lexicon and has received research funding from Novartis. MEC has provided consulting or advisory services for Advanced Accelerator Applications (a Novartis company), Ipsen, Sirtex Medical, Novartis, speakers bureau services for Advanced Accelerator Applications, Ipsen, Sirtex Medical, and Pfizer, and has received research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications. PLK has provided consulting or advisory services for Ipsen, Lexicon, and Advanced Accelerator Applications, and has received research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Lexicon, Ipsen, Xencor, and Brahms. PLK owns stock in Guardant Health. PBR has provided consulting or advisory services for Ipsen, Advanced Accelerator Applications, ITM, and Novartis; has received research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Ipsen, and ITM; and has received travel or accommodation expenses from Ipsen. LB has provided consulting services (non-remunerated) for Advanced Accelerator Applications, ITM, Clovis Oncology, Curium, and Iba; has provided speaker's bureau services (non-remunerated) for Advanced Accelerator Applications, ITM, and Iba; and has received research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications. AH has provided consulting or advisory services for Novartis, Ipsen, Perthera, Celgene and AbbVie, and has received travel or accommodation expenses from Halozyme and research funding from Ipsen. EM has provided consulting or advisory services for Ipsen and Advanced Accelerator Applications, has received honoraria from Advanced Accelerator Applications and Curium, and has received research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications and Nordic Nanovector. EMW has provided consulting or advisory services for Advanced Accelerator Applications, Lexicon, and Progenics. JCY has provided consulting or advisory services for Advanced Accelerator Applications, Ipsen, Chiasma, Crinetics, and Hutchinson Medi Pharma, and has received research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications and Novartis. MEP has provided consulting or advisory services for Advanced Accelerator Applications and Ipsen, and has received honoraria from Ipsen, Hutchison MediPharma, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Riemser, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and travel or accommodation expenses from Ipsen and Hutchison. EG has provided consulting or advisory services for MSD, Pfizer, Ipsen, Roche, and Bristol Myers Squibb; has received honoraria from Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Roche, Eisai, Eusa Pharma, MSD, Genzyme, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Lexicon, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, and Lilly; has received travel or accommodation expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, and Ipsen; and has received research funding from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Molecular Templates, Lexicon, and Astellas Pharma. EVC has provided consulting or advisory services for Bayer, Lilly, Roche, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Halozyme, Array BioPharma, Biocartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Daiichi Sankyo, Pierre Fabre, Sirtex Medical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Incyte, and has received research funding from Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck, Merck KGaA, Servier, and Bristol Myers Squibb. GG is an employee of Novartis, owns stock in Novartis, and receives travel or accommodation expenses from Novartis. AB is an employee of Novartis, owns stock in Novartis, and receives travel or accommodation expenses from Novartis. MFM is an employee of Novartis and owns stock in Novartis. AD is an employee of Novartis and owns stock in Novartis. SM is an employee of Novartis and owns stock in Novartis. EPK has an employment interest in Cyclotron Rotterdam BV; has stock or other ownership interest in AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Roche; has patent or intellectual property interest in Advanced Accelerator Applications; and receives travel or accommodation expenses from Advanced Accelerator Applications. ES and HD declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)