Search

Background: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with denoising has been reported as potentially improving the image quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multi-modal MRI is a critical non-invasive method for tumor detection, surgery planning, and prognosis assessment; however, the DLR on multi-modal glioma imaging has not been assessed. Purpose: To assess multi-modal MRI for glioma based on the DLR method. Material and Methods: We assessed multi-modal images of 107 glioma patients (49 preoperative and 58 postoperative). All the images were reconstructed with both DLR and conventional reconstruction methods, encompassing T1-weighted (T1W), contrast-enhanced T1W (CE-T1), T2-weighted (T2W), and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR). The image quality was evaluated using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge sharpness. Visual assessment and diagnostic assessment were performed blindly by neuroradiologists. Results: In contrast with conventionally reconstructed images, (residual) tumor SNR for all modalities and tumor to white/gray matter CNR from DLR images were higher in T1W, T2W, and T2-FLAIR sequences. The visual assessment of DLR images demonstrated the superior visualization of tumor in T2W, edema in T2-FLAIR, enhanced tumor and necrosis part in CE-T1, and fewer artifacts in all modalities. Improved diagnostic efficiency and confidence were observed for preoperative cases with DLR images. Conclusion: DLR of multi-modal MRI reconstruction prototype for glioma has demonstrated significant improvements in image quality. Moreover, it increased diagnostic efficiency and confidence of glioma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Emerging as a hybrid imaging modality, cone-beam X-ray luminescence computed tomography (CB-XLCT) has been developed using X-ray-excitable nanoparticles. In contrast to conventional bio-optical imaging techniques like bioluminescence tomography (BLT) and fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT), CB-XLCT offers the advantage of greater imaging depth while significantly reducing interference from autofluorescence and background fluorescence, owing to its utilization of X-ray-excited nanoparticles. However, due to the intricate excitation process and extensive light scattering within biological tissues, the inverse problem of CB-XLCT is fundamentally ill-conditioned. Methods: An end-to-end three-dimensional deep encoder-decoder network, termed DeepCB-XLCT, is introduced to improve the quality of CB-XLCT reconstructions. This network directly establishes a nonlinear mapping between the distribution of internal X-ray-excitable nanoparticles and the corresponding boundary fluorescent signals. To improve the fidelity of target shape restoration, the structural similarity loss (SSIM) was incorporated into the objective function of the DeepCB-XLCT network. Additionally, a loss term specifically for target regions was introduced to improve the network's emphasis on the areas of interest. As a result, the inaccuracies in reconstruction caused by the simplified linear model used in conventional methods can be effectively minimized by the proposed DeepCB-XLCT method. Results and Conclusions: Numerical simulations, phantom experiments, and in vivo experiments with two targets were performed, revealing that the DeepCB-XLCT network enhances reconstruction accuracy regarding contrast-to-noise ratio and shape similarity when compared to traditional methods. In addition, the findings from the XLCT tomographic images involving three targets demonstrate its potential for multi-target CB-XLCT imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is equal to or higher than that of 3 T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR). To objectively analyze the images from the 13 healthy volunteers, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images obtained by the 1.5 T scanner with and without DLR, as well as for images obtained by the 3 T scanner. In the subjective, T2W images of the prostate were visually evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The SNRs and CNRs in 1.5 T images with DLR were higher than that in 3 T images. Subjective image scores were better for 1.5 T images with DLR than 3 T images. The use of the DLR technique in 1.5 T MRI substantially improved the SNR and image quality of T2W images of the prostate gland, as compared to 3 T MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Changing a window width (WW) alters appearance of noise and contrast of CT images. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adjusted WW for deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in detecting hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on CT with DLR. This retrospective study included thirty-five patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. DLR was used to reconstruct arterial, portal, and delayed phase images. The investigation of the optimal WW involved two blinded readers. Then, five other blinded readers independently read the image sets for detection of HCCs and evaluation of image quality with optimal or conventional liver WW. The optimal WW for detection of HCC was 119 (rounded to 120 in the subsequent analyses) Hounsfield unit (HU), which was the average of adjusted WW in the arterial, portal, and delayed phases. The average figures of merit for the readers for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis to detect HCC were 0.809 (reader 1/2/3/4/5, 0.765/0.798/0.892/0.764/0.827) in the optimal WW (120 HU) and 0.765 (reader 1/2/3/4/5, 0.707/0.769/0.838/0.720/0.791) in the conventional WW (150 HU), and statistically significant difference was observed between them (p < 0.001). Image quality in the optimal WW was superior to those in the conventional WW, and significant difference was seen for some readers (p < 0.041). The optimal WW for detection of HCC was narrower than conventional WW on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT with DLR. Compared with the conventional liver WW, optimal liver WW significantly improved detection performance of HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diagnostic impact of deep learning computed tomography (CT) reconstruction on intracranial aneurysm (IA) remains unclear. Purpose: To quantify the image quality and diagnostic confidence on IA in craniocervical CT angiography (CTA) reconstructed with DEep Learning Trained Algorithm (DELTA) compared to the routine hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Material and Methods: A total of 60 patients who underwent craniocervical CTA and were diagnosed with IA were retrospectively enrolled. Images were reconstructed with DELTA and HIR, where the image quality was first compared in noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Next, two radiologists independently graded the noise appearance, arterial sharpness, small vessel visibility, conspicuity of calcifications that may present in arteries, and overall image quality, each with a 5-point Likert scale. The diagnostic confidence on IAs of various sizes was also graded. Results: Significantly lower noise and higher SNR and CNR were found on DELTA than on HIR images (all P < 0.05). All five subjective metrics were scored higher by both readers on the DELTA images (all P < 0.05), with good to excellent inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.77–0.93). DELTA images were rated with higher diagnostic confidence on IAs compared to HIR (P < 0.001), particularly for those with size ≤3 mm, which were scored 4.5 ± 0.6 versus 3.4 ± 0.8 and 4.4 ± 0.7 versus 3.5 ± 0.8 by two readers, respectively. Conclusion: The DELTA shows potential for improving the image quality and the associated confidence in diagnosing IA that may be worth consideration for routine craniocervical CTA applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) improves interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Methods: In this retrospective study, 35 consecutive patients suspected of ILD who underwent CT including the chest region were included. High-resolution CT images of the unilateral lung with DLR and HIR were reconstructed for the right and left lungs. A radiologist placed regions of interest on the lung and measured standard deviation of CT attenuation (i.e., quantitative image noise). In the qualitative image analyses, 5 blinded readers assessed the presence of honeycombing and reticulation, qualitative image noise, artifacts, and overall image quality using a 5-point scale (except for artifacts which was evaluated using a 3-point scale). Results: The quantitative and qualitative image noise in DLR was remarkably reduced compared to that in HIR (P <.001). Artifacts and overall DLR quality were significantly improved compared to those of HIR (P <.001 for 4 out of 5 readers). Interobserver agreement in the evaluations of honeycombing and reticulation for DLR (0.557 [0.450-0.693] and 0.525 [0.470-0.541], respectively) were higher than those for HIR (0.321 [0.211-0.520] and 0.470 [0.354-0.533], respectively). A statistically significant difference was found for honeycombing (P =.014). Conclusions: DLR improved interobserver agreement in the evaluation of honeycombing in patients with ILD on CT compared to HIR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The development of 7‐Tesla (7T) magnetic resonance imaging systems has opened new avenues for exploring the advantages of diffusion imaging at higher field strengths, especially in neuroscience research. This review investigates whether 7T diffusion imaging offers significant benefits over lower field strengths by addressing the following: Technical challenges and corresponding strategies: Challenges include achieving shorter transverse relaxation/effective transverse relaxation times and greater B0 and B1 inhomogeneities. Advanced techniques including high‐performance gradient systems, parallel imaging, multi‐shot acquisition, and parallel transmission can mitigate these issues. Comparison of 3‐Tesla and 7T diffusion imaging: Technologies such as multiplexed sensitivity encoding and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) have been developed to mitigate artifacts and improve image quality. This comparative analysis demonstrates significant improvements in the signal‐to‐noise ratio and spatial resolution at 7T with a powerful gradient system, facilitating enhanced visualization of microstructural changes. Despite greater geometric distortions and signal inhomogeneity at 7T, the system shows clear advantages in high b‐value imaging and high‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging. Additionally, multiplexed sensitivity encoding significantly reduces image blurring and distortion, and DLR substantially improves the signal‐to‐noise ratio and image sharpness. 7T diffusion applications in structural analysis and disease characterization: This review discusses the potential applications of 7T diffusion imaging in structural analysis and disease characterization.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Eighteen patients were imaged with both standard protocol and fast protocol using reduced signal averages, each protocol including sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted, sagittal T1-weighted, and axial T2-weighted 2D fast spin-echo sequences. Fast-acquisition data was additionally reconstructed using vendor-supplied deep-learning reconstruction with three different noise reduction factors. For qualitative analysis, standard images as well as fast images with and without deep-learning reconstruction were graded by three radiologists on five different categories. For quantitative analysis, convolutional neural networks were applied to sagittal T1-weighted images to segment intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies, and disc heights and vertebral body volumes were derived. RESULTS: Based on noninferiority testing on qualitative scores, fast images without deep-learning reconstruction were inferior to standard images for most categories. However, deep-learning reconstruction improved the average scores, and noninferiority was observed over 24 out of 45 comparisons (all with sagittal T2-weighted images while 4/5 comparisons with sagittal T1-weighted and axial T2-weighted images). Interobserver variability increased with 50 and 75% noise reduction factors. Deep-learning reconstructed fast images with 50% and 75% noise reduction factors had comparable disc heights and vertebral body volumes to standard images (r2≥ 0.86 for disc heights and r2≥ 0.98 for vertebral body volumes). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that deep-learning-reconstructed fast-acquisition images have the potential to provide noninferior image quality and comparable quantitative assessment to standard clinical images.

Abstract Objectives To investigate whether reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can improve the accuracy of evaluating muscle invasion using VI-RADS. Methods Eighty-six bladder cancer participants who were evaluated by conventional full field-of-view (fFOV) DWI, standard rFOV (rFOVSTA) DWI, and fast rFOV with DLR (rFOVDLR) DWI were included in this prospective study. Tumors were categorized according to the vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS). Qualitative image quality scoring, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and ADC value were evaluated. Friedman test with post hoc test revealed the difference across the three DWIs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the areas under the curve (AUCs). Results The AUC of the rFOVSTA DWI and rFOVDLR DWI were higher than that of fFOV DWI. rFOVDLR DWI reduced the acquisition time from 5:02 min to 3:25 min, and showed higher scores in overall image quality with higher CNR and SNR, compared to rFOVSTA DWI (p 0.05). Conclusions rFOV DWI with DLR can improve the diagnostic accuracy of fFOV DWI for evaluating muscle invasion. Applying DLR to rFOV DWI reduced the acquisition time and improved overall image quality while maintaining ADC value and diagnostic accuracy. Critical relevance statement The diagnostic performance and image quality of full field-of-view DWI, reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI with and without DLR were compared. DLR would benefit the wide clinical application of rFOV DWI by reducing the acquisition time and improving the image quality. Key Points Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can reduce scan time and improve image quality. Reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with DLR showed better diagnostic performances than full field-of-view DWI. There was no difference of diagnostic accuracy between rFOV DWI with DLR and standard rFOV DWI. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background The presence of infarction in patients with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) is a critical feature in predicting adverse cardiac events. This study aimed to compare the detection rate of UMI using conventional and deep learning reconstruction (DLR)-based late gadolinium enhancement (LGEO and LGEDL, respectively) and evaluate optimal quantification parameters to enhance diagnosis and management of suspected patients with UMI. Methods This prospective study included 98 patients (68 men; mean age: 55.8 ± 8.1 years) with suspected UMI treated at our hospital from April 2022 to August 2023. LGEO and LGEDL images were obtained using conventional and commercially available inline DLR algorithms. The myocardial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and percentage of enhanced area (Parea) employing the signal threshold versus reference mean (STRM) approach, which correlates the signal intensity (SI) within areas of interest with the average SI of normal regions, were analyzed. Analysis was performed using the standard deviation (SD) threshold approach (2SD–5SD) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) method. The diagnostic efficacies based on LGEDL and LGEO images were calculated. Results The SNRDL and CNRDL were two times better than the SNRO and CNRO, respectively (P 0.05). The Parea−DL and Parea−O also differed except between the 2SD and 3SD and the 4SD/5SD and FWHM methods (P

Background: The presence of infarction in patients with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) is a critical feature in predicting adverse cardiac events. This study aimed to compare the detection rate of UMI using conventional and deep learning reconstruction (DLR)-based late gadolinium enhancement (LGEO and LGEDL, respectively) and evaluate optimal quantification parameters to enhance diagnosis and management of suspected patients with UMI. Methods: This prospective study included 98 patients (68 men; mean age: 55.8 ± 8.1 years) with suspected UMI treated at our hospital from April 2022 to August 2023. LGEO and LGEDL images were obtained using conventional and commercially available inline DLR algorithms. The myocardial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and percentage of enhanced area (Parea) employing the signal threshold versus reference mean (STRM) approach, which correlates the signal intensity (SI) within areas of interest with the average SI of normal regions, were analyzed. Analysis was performed using the standard deviation (SD) threshold approach (2SD–5SD) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) method. The diagnostic efficacies based on LGEDL and LGEO images were calculated. Results: The SNRDL and CNRDL were two times better than the SNRO and CNRO, respectively (P < 0.05). Parea−DL was elevated compared to Parea−O using the threshold methods (P < 0.05); however, no intergroup difference was found based on the FWHM method (P > 0.05). The Parea−DL and Parea−O also differed except between the 2SD and 3SD and the 4SD/5SD and FWHM methods (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that each SD method exhibited good diagnostic efficacy for detecting UMI, with the Parea−DL having the best diagnostic efficacy based on the 5SD method (P < 0.05). Overall, the LGEDL images had better image quality. Strong diagnostic efficacy for UMI identification was achieved when the STRM was ≥ 4SD and ≥ 3SD for the LGEDL and LGEO, respectively. Conclusions: STRM selection for LGEDL magnetic resonance images helps improve clinical decision-making in patients with UMI. This study underscored the importance of STRM selection for analyzing LGEDL images to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making for patients with UMI, further providing better cardiovascular care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate whether reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can improve the accuracy of evaluating muscle invasion using VI-RADS. Methods: Eighty-six bladder cancer participants who were evaluated by conventional full field-of-view (fFOV) DWI, standard rFOV (rFOVSTA) DWI, and fast rFOV with DLR (rFOVDLR) DWI were included in this prospective study. Tumors were categorized according to the vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS). Qualitative image quality scoring, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and ADC value were evaluated. Friedman test with post hoc test revealed the difference across the three DWIs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the areas under the curve (AUCs). Results: The AUC of the rFOVSTA DWI and rFOVDLR DWI were higher than that of fFOV DWI. rFOVDLR DWI reduced the acquisition time from 5:02 min to 3:25 min, and showed higher scores in overall image quality with higher CNR and SNR, compared to rFOVSTA DWI (p < 0.05). The mean ADC of all cases of rFOVSTA DWI and rFOVDLR DWI was significantly lower than that of fFOV DWI (all p < 0.05). There was no difference in mean ADC value and the AUC for evaluating muscle invasion between rFOVSTA DWI and rFOVDLR DWI (p > 0.05). Conclusions: rFOV DWI with DLR can improve the diagnostic accuracy of fFOV DWI for evaluating muscle invasion. Applying DLR to rFOV DWI reduced the acquisition time and improved overall image quality while maintaining ADC value and diagnostic accuracy. Critical relevance statement: The diagnostic performance and image quality of full field-of-view DWI, reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI with and without DLR were compared. DLR would benefit the wide clinical application of rFOV DWI by reducing the acquisition time and improving the image quality. Key Points: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can reduce scan time and improve image quality. Reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with DLR showed better diagnostic performances than full field-of-view DWI. There was no difference of diagnostic accuracy between rFOV DWI with DLR and standard rFOV DWI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms exhibit object-dependent resolution and noise performance. Thus, traditional geometric CT phantoms cannot fully capture the clinical imaging performance of DLR. This study uses a patient-derived 3D-printed PixelPrint lung phantom to evaluate a commercial DLR algorithm across a wide range of radiation dose levels. Method. The lung phantom used in this study is based on a patient chest CT scan containing ground glass opacities and was fabricated using PixelPrint 3D-printing technology. The phantom was placed inside two different size extension rings to mimic a small- and medium-sized patient and was scanned on a conventional CT scanner at exposures between 0.5 and 20 mGy. Each scan was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction, and DLR at five levels of denoising. Image noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), root mean squared error, structural similarity index (SSIM), and multi-scale SSIM (MS SSIM) were calculated for each image. Results. DLR demonstrated superior performance compared to FBP and iterative reconstruction for all measured metrics in both phantom sizes, with better performance for more aggressive denoising levels. DLR was estimated to reduce dose by 25%–83% in the small phantom and by 50%–83% in the medium phantom without decreasing image quality for any of the metrics measured in this study. These dose reduction estimates are more conservative compared to the estimates obtained when only considering noise and CNR. Conclusion. DLR has the capability of producing diagnostic image quality at up to 83% lower radiation dose, which can improve the clinical utility and viability of lower dose CT scans. Furthermore, the PixelPrint phantom used in this study offers an improved testing environment with more realistic tissue structures compared to traditional CT phantoms, allowing for structure-based image quality evaluation beyond noise and contrast-based assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) obtained by echo-planar imaging (EPI) are frequently degraded by susceptibility artifacts from air-soft tissue interfaces at complicated structures in the paranasal sinus, oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. It has been suggested that DWI obtained by fast advanced spin-echo (FASE) or reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could be useful for image quality improvements. The purpose of this investigation using in vitro and in vivo studies was to determine the influence of sequence difference and application of DLR for DWI on image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) evaluation, and differentiation of malignant from benign head and neck tumors. In comparison with the EPI sequence, the FASE sequence and DLR can improve image quality and image distortion of DWIs without significantly influencing ADC measurements or the capability to differentiate malignant from benign head and neck tumors. Background: Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) obtained by echo-planar imaging (EPI) are frequently degraded by susceptibility artifacts. It has been suggested that DWI obtained by fast advanced spin-echo (FASE) or reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could be useful for image quality improvements. The purpose of this investigation using in vitro and in vivo studies was to determine the influence of sequence difference and of DLR for DWI on image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) evaluation, and differentiation of malignant from benign head and neck tumors. Methods: For the in vitro study, a DWI phantom was scanned by FASE and EPI sequences and reconstructed with and without DLR. Each ADC within the phantom for each DWI was then assessed and correlated for each measured ADC and standard value by Spearman's rank correlation analysis. For the in vivo study, DWIs obtained by EPI and FASE sequences were also obtained for head and neck tumor patients. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ADC were then determined based on ROI measurements, while SNR of tumors and ADC were compared between all DWI data sets by means of Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Results: For the in vitro study, all correlations between measured ADC and standard reference were significant and excellent (0.92 ≤ ρ ≤ 0.99, p < 0.0001). For the in vivo study, the SNR of FASE with DLR was significantly higher than that of FASE without DLR (p = 0.02), while ADC values for benign and malignant tumors showed significant differences between each sequence with and without DLR (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In comparison with EPI sequence, FASE sequence and DLR can improve image quality and distortion of DWIs without significantly influencing ADC measurements or differentiation capability of malignant from benign head and neck tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the impact of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid-iterative reconstruction (hybrid-IR) on vertebral mass depiction, detection, and diagnosis of spinal cord compression on computed tomography (CT). Methods: This retrospective study included 29 and 20 patients with and without vertebral masses. CT images were reconstructed using DLR and hybrid-IR. Three readers performed vertebral mass detection tests and evaluated the presence of spinal cord compression, the depiction of vertebral masses, and image noise. Quantitative image noise was measured by placing regions of interest on the aorta and spinal cord. Results: Deep learning reconstruction tended to improve the performance of readers with less diagnostic imaging experience in detecting vertebral masses (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.892-0.966) compared with hybrid-IR (AUC = 0.839-0.917). Diagnostic performance in evaluating spinal cord compression in DLR (AUC = 0.887-0.995) also improved compared with that in hybrid-IR (AUC = 0.866-0.942) for some readers. The depiction of vertebral masses and subjective image noise in DLR were significantly improved compared with those in hybrid-IR (P <.041). Quantitative image noise in DLR was also significantly reduced compared with that in hybrid-IR (P <.001). Conclusion: Deep learning reconstruction improved the depiction of vertebral masses, which resulted in a tendency to improve the performance of CT compared to hybrid-IR in detecting vertebral masses and diagnosing spinal cord compression for some readers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the influence of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on bladder MRI, specifically examination time, image quality, and diagnostic performance of vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) within a prospective clinical cohort. Methods: Seventy participants with bladder cancer who underwent MRI between August 2022 and February 2023 with a protocol containing standard T2-weighted imaging (T2WIS), standard diffusion-weighted imaging (DWIS), fast T2WI with DLR (T2WIDL), and fast DWI with DLR (DWIDL) were enrolled in this prospective study. Imaging quality was evaluated by measuring signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and qualitative image quality scoring. Additionally, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of bladder lesions derived from DWIS and DWIDL was measured and VI-RADS scoring was performed. Paired t-test or paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed to compare image quality score, SNR, CNR, and ADC between standard sequences and fast sequences with DLR. The diagnostic performance for VI-RADS was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Compared to T2WIS and DWIS, T2WIDL and DWIDL reduced the acquisition time from 5:57 min to 3:13 min and showed significantly higher SNR, CNR, qualitative image quality score of overall image quality, image sharpness, and lesion conspicuity. There were no significant differences in ADC and AUC of VI-RADS between standard sequences and fast sequences with DLR. Conclusions: The application of DLR to T2WI and DWI reduced examination time and significantly improved image quality, maintaining ADC and the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of compressed sensing (CS) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for improving spatial resolution, image quality and focal liver lesion detection on high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (HR-CE-T1WI) obtained by CS with DLR as compared with conventional CE-T1WI with parallel imaging (PI). Seventy-seven participants with focal liver lesions underwent conventional CE-T1WI with PI and HR-CE-T1WI, surgical resection, transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation, followed by histopathological or >2-year follow-up examinations in our hospital. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of liver, spleen and kidney were calculated for each patient, after which each SNR was compared by means of paired t -test. To compare focal lesion detection capabilities of the two methods, a 5-point visual scoring system was adopted for a per lesion basis analysis. Jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis was then performed, while sensitivity and false positive rates (/data set) for consensus assessment of the two methods were also compared by using McNemar's test or the signed rank test. Each SNR of HR-CE-T1WI was significantly higher than that of conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p < 0.05). Sensitivities for consensus assessment showed that HR-CE-MRI had significantly higher sensitivity than conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p = 0.004). Moreover, there were significantly fewer FP/cases for HR-CE-T1WI than for conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p = 0.04). CS with DLR are useful for improving spatial resolution, image quality and focal liver lesion detection capability of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced 3D T1WI without any need for longer breath-holding time. • SNR of HR-CE-T1WI for each organ were significantly higher than that of conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p<0.05). • Qualitative indexes of HR-CE-T1WI were significantly improved, when compared with conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p<0.05). • HR-CE-T1WI demonstrated significantly better diagnostic performance with conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p<0.05). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm reduces noise in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), thereby enabling faster MRI acquisition. Purpose: To compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of conventional turbo spin-echo (TSE) T2-weighted (T2W) imaging with DL-accelerated sagittal T2W imaging in the female pelvic cavity. Methods: This study evaluated 149 consecutive female pelvic MRI examinations, including conventional T2W imaging with TSE (acquisition time = 2:59) and DL-accelerated T2W imaging with breath hold (DL-BH) (1:05 [0:14 × 3 breath-holds]) in the sagittal plane. In 294 randomly ordered sagittal T2W images, two radiologists independently assessed image quality (sharpness, subjective noise, artifacts, and overall image quality), made a diagnosis for uterine leiomyomas, and scored diagnostic confidence. For the uterus and piriformis muscle, quantitative imaging analysis was also performed. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the two sets of T2W images. Results: In the qualitative analysis, DL-BH showed similar or significantly higher scores for all features than conventional T2W imaging (P <0.05). In the quantitative analysis, the noise in the uterus was lower in DL-BH, but the noise in the muscle was lower in conventional T2W imaging. In the uterus and muscle, the signal-to-noise ratio was significantly lower in DL-BH than in conventional T2W imaging (P <0.001). The diagnostic performance of the two sets of T2W images was not different for uterine leiomyoma. Conclusions: DL-accelerated sagittal T2W imaging obtained with three breath-holds demonstrated superior or comparable image quality to conventional T2W imaging with no significant difference in diagnostic performance for uterine leiomyomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo develop a deep learning-based method for rapid liver proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2 * quantification with built-in uncertainty estimation using self-gated free-breathing stack-of-radial MRI.MethodsThis work developed an uncertainty-aware physics-driven deep learning network (UP-Net) to (1) suppress radial streaking artifacts because of undersampling after self-gating, (2) calculate accurate quantitative maps, and (3) provide pixel-wise uncertainty maps. UP-Net incorporated a phase augmentation strategy, generative adversarial network architecture, and an MRI physics loss term based on a fat-water and R2 * signal model. UP-Net was trained and tested using free-breathing multi-echo stack-of-radial MRI data from 105 subjects. UP-Net uncertainty scores were calibrated in a validation dataset and used to predict quantification errors for liver PDFF and R2 * in a testing dataset.ResultsCompared with images reconstructed using compressed sensing (CS), UP-Net achieved structural similarity index >0.87 and normalized root mean squared error

Objective To explore the feasibility of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in shortening the scanning time through water phantom experiments. Methods The control variable method based on phantom, was adopted to depict the curves of scanning time varying with the number of excitation (NEX) ，matrix，and resolution. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and subjective image quality of different DLR with high, medium and low noise reduction levels (DLR_H, DLR_M, DLR_L) and traditional reconstruction (ConR) were analyzed, including the four-point assessment of sharpness and detail clarity, and distortion degree, and the curves of changes were depicted and the fitting curves were calculated. Results The positive correlation between NEX and resolution with MRI scanning time and SNR was consistent in ConR and DLR reconstructions with different noise reduction levels. Specifically, under the same NEX and resolution conditions, the SNR of ConR, DLR_L, DLR_M, and DLR_H increased sequentially. When the matrix was fixed at 512×512 while images with subjective evaluation score of 3 or 4 were taken as satisfactory ones, the images reconstructed by DLR can obtain satisfactory sharpness, distortion degree and detail display, and when NEX were 3, 4, 5 and 7 and 11, image details were displayed best while scanning time was significantly reduced. Meanwhile, the distortion of images achieved satisfactory results with NEX of 2, 4, 5, and 6. Also, satisfactory detail display was obtained when NEX was 3, 5, 7 and 11. All the above combinations of NEX and resolution saved scanning time from 31 to 244 seconds. Similarly, as the resolution increased, the image scores of the sharpness and detail display gradually increased and. distortion degree decreased. When NEX was fixed at 6, the images reconstructed by DLR_H, DLR_M, DLR_L and ConR obtained satisfactory sharpness ；When the matrix was 320×320, 384×384, 448×448 and 640×640,, the scanning time was 141 seconds, 141 seconds, 187 seconds and 232 seconds, respectively. DLR_H and DLR_M achieved a smaller distortion degree at the 512×512 matrix, while DLR_L and ConR required a higher imaging matrix and longer scanning time to obtain similar image quality. For detail clarity, DLR_H achieved satisfactory detail display when the matrix was 512×512, and the scanning time was less than that of DLR_M, DLR_L and ConR. Conclusions DLR, especially DLR_H, while reducing NEX and resolution to shorten the MRI scanning time, may not only maintain a satisfactory SNR and image detail clarity, but also achieve higher image clarity and lower distortion degree.

MRI plays an important role in abdominal imaging because of its ability to detect and characterize focal lesions. However, MRI examinations have several challenges, such as comparatively long scan times and motion management through breath-holding maneuvers. Techniques for reducing scan time with acceptable image quality, such as parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and cutting-edge deep learning techniques, have been developed to enable problem-solving strategies. Additionally, free-breathing techniques for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, such as extra-dimensional-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, golden-angle radial sparse parallel, and liver acceleration volume acquisition Star, can help patients with severe dyspnea or those under sedation to undergo abdominal MRI. We aimed to present various advanced abdominal MRI techniques for reducing the scan time while maintaining image quality and free-breathing techniques for dynamic imaging and illustrate cases using the techniques mentioned above. A review of these advanced techniques can assist in the appropriate interpretation of sequences.

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of model-based deep learning reconstruction in prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods: This retrospective study evaluated two prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) methods: deep learning reconstruction (DL-DWI) and traditional parallel imaging (PI-DWI). We examined 32 patients with radiologically diagnosed and histologically confirmed prostate cancer (PCa) lesions ≥10 mm. Image quality was evaluated both qualitatively (for overall quality, prostate conspicuity, and lesion conspicuity) and quantitatively, using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prostate tissue. Results: In the qualitative evaluation, DL-DWI scored significantly higher than PI-DWI for all three parameters (p

Objective To demonstrate that a T2 periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) technique using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) will provide better image quality and decrease image noise. Methods From December 2020 to March 2021, 35 patients examined cervical spine MRI were included in this study. Four sets of images including fast spin echo (FSE), original PROPELLER, PROPELLER DLR50%, and DLR75% were quantitatively and qualitatively reviewed. We calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the spinal cord and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the spinal cord by applying region-of-interest at the spinal cord, SCM muscle, and background air. We evaluated image noise with regard to the spinal cord, SCM, and back muscles at each level from C2-3 to C6-7 in the 4 sets. Results At all disc levels, the mean SNR values for the spinal cord and SCM muscles were significantly higher in PROPELLER DLR50% and DLR75% compared to FSE and original PROPELLER images (P  < .0083). The mean CNR values of the spinal cord were significantly higher in PROPELLER DLR50% and DLR75% compared to FSE at the C3-4 and 4-5 levels and PROPELLER DLR75% compared to FSE at the C6-7 level (P  < .0083). Qualitative analysis of image noise on the spinal cord, SCM, and back muscles showed that PROPELLER DLR50% and PROPELLER DLR75% images showed a significant denoising effect compared to the FSE and original PROPELLER images. Conclusion The combination of PROPELLER and DLR improved image quality with a high SNR and CNR and reduced noise. Advances in knowledge Motion-insensitive imaging technique (PROPELLER) increased the image quality compared to conventional FSE images. PROPELLER technique with a DLR reduced image noise and improved image quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: This study explores the use of deep learning (DL) techniques in MRI of the orbit to enhance imaging. Standard protocols, although detailed, have lengthy acquisition times. We investigate DL‐based methods for T2‐weighted and T1‐weighted, fat‐saturated, contrast‐enhanced turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, aiming to improve image quality, reduce acquisition time, minimize artifacts, and enhance diagnostic confidence in orbital imaging. Methods: In a 3‐Tesla MRI study of 50 patients evaluating orbital diseases from March to July 2023, conventional (TSES) and DL TSE sequences (TSEDL) were used. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed the image datasets for image quality, diagnostic confidence, noise levels, artifacts, and image sharpness using a randomized and blinded 4‐point Likert scale. Results: TSEDL significantly reduced image noise and artifacts, enhanced image sharpness, and decreased scan time, outperforming TSES (p <.05). TSEDL showed superior overall image quality and diagnostic confidence, with relevant findings effectively detected in both DL‐based and conventional images. In 94% of cases, readers preferred accelerated imaging. Conclusion: The study proved that using DL for MRI image reconstruction in orbital scans significantly cut acquisition time by 69%. This approach also enhanced image quality, reduced image noise, sharpened images, and boosted diagnostic confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the impact on acquisition time reduction and image quality of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the pelvis at 1.5 T compared to standard DWI. A total of 55 patients (mean age, 61 ± 13 years; range, 27-89; 20 men, 35 women) were consecutively included in this retrospective, monocentric study between February and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) standard DWI (DWI S) in clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and (2) DL-reconstructed DWI (DWI DL). All patients were examined using the institution's standard MRI protocol according to their diagnosis including DWI with two different b -values (0 and 800 s/mm2) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by four radiologists using a visual 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) for the following criteria: overall image quality, noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. The qualitative scores for DWI S and DWI DL were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The overall image quality was evaluated to be significantly superior in DWI DL compared to DWI S for b = 0 s/mm2, b = 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps by all readers (P <.05). The extent of noise was evaluated to be significantly less in DWI DL compared to DWI S for b = 0 s/mm2, b = 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps by all readers (P <.001). No significant differences were found regarding artifacts, lesion detectability, sharpness of organs, and diagnostic confidence (P >.05). Acquisition time for DWI S was 2:06 minutes, and simulated acquisition time for DWI DL was 1:12 minutes. DL image reconstruction improves image quality, and simulation results suggest that a reduction in acquisition time for diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvis at 1.5 T is possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study assessed the influence of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on the quality of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using an ice-water phantom. An ice-water phantom with known diffusion properties (true ADC = 1.1 × 10–3 mm2/s at 0 °C) was imaged at various b-values (0, 1000, 2000, and 4000 s/mm2) using a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner with slice thicknesses of 1.5 and 3.0 mm. All DWIs were reconstructed with or without DLR. ADC maps were generated using combinations of b-values 0 and 1000, 0 and 2000, and 0 and 4000 s/mm2. Based on the quantitative imaging biomarker alliance profile, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNRs) in DWIs was calculated, and the accuracy, precision, and within-subject parameter variance (wCV) of the ADCs were evaluated. DLR improved the SNR in DWIs with b-values ranging from 0 to 2000s/mm2; however, its effectiveness was diminished at 4000 s/mm2. There was no noticeable difference in the ADCs of images generated with or without implementing DLR. For a slice thickness of 1.5 mm and combined b-values of 0 and 4000 s/mm2, the ADC values were 0.97 × 10–3and 0.98 × 10–3mm2/s with and without DLR, respectively, both being lower than the true ADC value. Furthermore, DLR enhanced the precision and wCV of the ADC measurements. DLR can enhance the SNR, repeatability, and precision of ADC measurements; however, it does not improve their accuracies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) compared to that of hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) to depict small vessels on computed tomography (CT). DLR and two types of hybrid IRs were used for image reconstruction. The target vessels were the basilar artery (BA), superior cerebellar artery (SCA), anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). The peak value, ΔCT values defined as the difference between the peak value and background, and full width at half maximum (FWHM), were obtained from the profile curves. In all target vessels, the peak and ΔCT values of DLR were significantly higher than those of the two types of hybrid IR (p < 0.001). Compared to that associated with hybrid IR, the FWHM of DLR was significantly lower in the SCA (p < 0.001), AICA (p < 0.001), and PICA (p < 0.001). In conclusion, DLR has the potential to improve visualization of small vessels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: T2 mapping can characterize peripheral neuropathy and muscle denervation due to axonal damage. Three-dimensional double echo steady-state (DESS) can simultaneously provide 3D qualitative information and T2 maps with equivalent spatial resolution. However, insufficient signal-to-noise ratiomay bias DESS-T2 values. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques can reduce noise, and hence may improve quantitation of high-resolution DESS-T2. This study aims to (i) evaluate the efect of DLR methods on DESS-T2 values, and (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of using DESS-T2 maps to differentiate abnormal from normal nerves and muscles in the upper extremities, with abnormality as determined by electromyography. Methods and results: Analysis of images from 25 subjects found that DLR decreased DESS-T2 values in abnormal muscles (DLR = 37.71 ± 9.11 msec, standard reconstruction = 38.56 ± 9.44 msec, p = 0.005) and normal muscles (DLR: 27.18 ± 6.34msec, standard reconstruction: 27.58 ± 6.34msec, p < 0.001) consistent with a noise reduction bias. Mean DESS-T2, both with and without DLR, was higher in abnormal nerves (abnormal = 75.99 ± 38.21 msec, normal = 35.10 ± 9.78 msec, p < 0.001) and muscles (abnormal = 37.71 ± 9.11 msec, normal = 27.18 ± 6.34 msec, p < 0.001). A higher DESS-T2 in muscle was associated with electromyography motor unit recruitment (p < 0.001). Discussion: These results suggest that quantitative DESS-T2 is improved by DLR and can differentiate the nerves andmuscles involved in peripheral neuropathies from those uninvolved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We investigated the effect of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) plus single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on neck CT in patients with dental metals, comparing it with DLR and with hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR)–SEMAR. Methods: In this retrospective study, 32 patients (25 men, 7 women; mean age: 63 ± 15 years) with dental metals underwent contrast-enhanced CT of the oral and oropharyngeal regions. Axial images were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid IR–SEMAR, and DLR-SEMAR. In quantitative analyses, degrees of image noise and artifacts were evaluated. In one-by-one qualitative analyses, 2 radiologists evaluated metal artifacts, the depiction of structures, and noise on five-point scales. In side-by-side qualitative analyses, artifacts and overall image quality were evaluated by comparing Hybrid IR–SEMAR with DLR-SEMAR. Results: Artifacts were significantly less with DLR-SEMAR than with DLR in quantitative (P <.001) and one-by-one qualitative (P <.001) analyses, which resulted in significantly better depiction of most structures (P <.004). Artifacts in side-by-side analysis and image noise in quantitative and one-by-one qualitative analyses (P <.001) were significantly less with DLR-SEMAR than with Hybrid IR–SEMAR, resulting in significantly better overall quality of DLR-SEMAR. Conclusions: Compared with DLR and Hybrid IR–SEMAR, DLR-SEMAR provided significantly better supra hyoid neck CT images in patients with dental metals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objective of this study was to implement a 5-minute MRI protocol for the shoulder in routine clinical practice consisting of accelerated 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction at 1.5 and 3 Tesla, and to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance to that of a standard 2D TSE protocol. Methods: Patients undergoing shoulder MRI between October 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent two MRI examinations: first a standard, fully sampled TSE (TSES) protocol reconstructed with a standard reconstruction followed by a second fast, prospectively undersampled TSE protocol with a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Image quality and visualization of anatomic structures as well as diagnostic performance with respect to shoulder lesions were assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale (5 = best). Interchangeability analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the two protocols. Results: A total of 30 participants was included (mean age 50±15 years; 15 men). Overall image quality was evaluated to be superior in TSEDL versus TSES (p0.05), and quantitative diagnostic performance for shoulder lesions when comparing the two sequences. Conclusions: A fast 5-minute TSEDL MRI protocol of the shoulder is feasible in routine clinical practice at 1.5 and 3 T, with interchangeable results concerning the diagnostic performance, allowing a reduction in scan time of more than 50% compared to the standard TSES protocol.

Purpose To assess the quality of four images obtained using single-breath-hold (SBH), single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) and multiple-breath-hold (MBH) SSFSE with and without deep-learning based reconstruction (DLR) in patients with Crohn’s disease. Materials and Methods This study included 61 patients who underwent MR enterography (MRE) for Crohn’s disease. The following images were compared: SBH-SSFSE with (SBH-DLR) and without (SBHconventional reconstruction [CR]) DLR and MBH-SSFSE with (MBH-DLR) and without (MBH-CR) DLR. Two radiologists independently reviewed the overall image quality, artifacts, sharpness, and motionrelated signal loss using a 5-point scale. Three inflammatory parameters were evaluated in the ileum, the terminal ileum, and the colon. Moreover, the presence of a spatial misalignment was evaluated. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated at two locations for each sequence. Results DLR significantly improved the image quality, artifacts, and sharpness of the SBH images. No significant differences in scores between MBH-CR and SBH-DLR were detected. SBH-DLR had the highest SNR (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement for inflammatory parameters was good to excellent (κ = 0.76–0.95) and the inter-sequence agreement was nearly perfect (κ = 0.92–0.94). Misalignment artifacts were observed more frequently in the MBH images than in the SBH images (p < 0.001). Conclusion SBH-DLR demonstrated equivalent quality and performance compared to MBH-CR. Furthermore, it can be acquired in less than half the time, without multiple BHs and reduce slice misalignments.

Background and Objective: Emerging as a hybrid imaging modality, cone-beam X-ray luminescence computed tomography (CB-XLCT) has been developed using X-ray-excitable nanoparticles. In contrast to conventional bio-optical imaging techniques like bioluminescence tomography (BLT) and fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT), CB-XLCT offers the advantage of greater imaging depth while significantly reducing interference from autofluorescence and background fluorescence, owing to its utilization of X-ray-excited nanoparticles. However, due to the intricate excitation process and extensive light scattering within biological tissues, the inverse problem of CB-XLCT is fundamentally ill-conditioned. Methods: An end-to-end three-dimensional deep encoder-decoder network, termed DeepCB-XLCT, is introduced to improve the quality of CB-XLCT reconstructions. This network directly establishes a nonlinear mapping between the distribution of internal X-ray-excitable nanoparticles and the corresponding boundary fluorescent signals. To improve the fidelity of target shape restoration, the structural similarity loss (SSIM) was incorporated into the objective function of the DeepCB-XLCT network. Additionally, a loss term specifically for target regions was introduced to improve the network’s emphasis on the areas of interest. As a result, the inaccuracies in reconstruction caused by the simplified linear model used in conventional methods can be effectively minimized by the proposed DeepCB-XLCT method. Results and Conclusions: Numerical simulations, phantom experiments, and in vivo experiments with two targets were performed, revealing that the DeepCB-XLCT network enhances reconstruction accuracy regarding contrast-to-noise ratio and shape similarity when compared to traditional methods. In addition, the findings from the XLCT tomographic images involving three targets demonstrate its potential for multi-target CB-XLCT imaging.

Objective To study the application value of advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE) of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technology in CT angiography (CTA) after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). Methods CTA images of 26 patients were reconstructed by hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and DLR-AiCE methods. The quality of the overall images, liver and kidneys, vascular lumen within the stent and thrombus outside the stent at the level of maximum artifact was scored subjectively. The average of the four subjective scores was taken as the final score and the consistency of the score was analyzed. CT values and standard deviations of the liver, kidneys, aorta, and stent were calculated and the artifact index (AI), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Results The subjective image quality scores were higher (all P＜0.001) in DLR-AiCE than that in HIR groups. There was a high agreement in subjective ratings between the two observers (ICC=0. 927, 95％CI:0. 905 to 0. 944, P＜0.001). Except for the minimum artifact within the right iliac stent and at the hepatic level, the AI value in the DLR-AiCE group was significantly (all P＜0. 05) lower than that in the HIR group. SNRs in DLR-AiCE group were significantly (all P＜0. 05) greater than that in the HIR group. Except for the maximum artifact in the right iliac stent and the minimum artifacts in the bilateral iliac stents, the CNRs in the DLR-AiCE group were significantly (all P＜0. 05) greater than that in the HIR group. Conclusion DLR-AiCE reduces stent artifacts and improves image quality of peripheral organs and aneurysm thrombus. DLR-AiCE is more conducive than HIR for CTA evaluation after EVAR [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced by major vendors, tested for CT examinations of a variety of organs, and compared with other reconstruction methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of DLR for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation with those of hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR) for standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs (SDCT, RDCT and ULDCT) obtained with high-definition CT (HDCT) and reconstructed at 0.25-mm, 0.5-mm and 1-mm section thicknesses with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes for patients with various pulmonary diseases. Materials and methods: Forty age-, gender- and body mass index-matched patients with various pulmonary diseases underwent SDCT (CT dose index volume vol>: mean ± standard deviation, 9.0 ± 1.8 mGy), RDCT (CTDIvol: 1.7 ± 0.2 mGy) and ULDCT (CTDIvol: 0.8 ± 0.1 mGy) at a HDCT. All CT data set were then reconstructed with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes by means of hybrid-type IR and DLR. SNR of lung parenchyma and probabilities of all lung textures were assessed for each CT data set. SNR and detection performance of each lung texture reconstructed with DLR and hybrid-type IR were then compared by means of paired t tests and ROC analyses for all CT data at each section thickness. Results: Data for each radiation dose showed DLR attained significantly higher SNR than hybrid-type IR for each of the CT data (p < 0.0001). On assessments of all findings except consolidation and nodules or masses, areas under the curve (AUCs) for ULDCT with hybrid-type IR for each section thickness (0.91 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.97) were significantly smaller than those with DLR (0.97 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05) and the standard protocol (0.98 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05). Conclusion: DLR is potentially more effective for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation than hybrid-type IR on all radiation dose CTs obtained at HDCT and reconstructed with each section thickness with both matrixes for patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to assess the optimal reconstruction parameters and the influence of tube current in extensor tendons three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) using deep learning reconstruction, using iterative reconstruction as a reference. In the phantom study, a cylindrical phantom with a 3 mm rod simulated an extensor tendon was used. The phantom images were acquired at tube current of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mA. In the clinical study, CT scans of hand tendons were performed on nine hands from eight patients. All images were reconstructed using advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE) parameters (body, body sharp, brain CTA, and brain LCD) and adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional (AIDR 3D). The objective image quality for tendon detectability was evaluated by calculating the low-contrast object specific contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRLO) in the phantom study and CNR and coefficient of variation (CV) in the clinical study. In the phantom study, CNRLO (at 200 mA) of AiCE parameters (body, body sharp, brain CTA, and brain LCD) and AIDR 3D were 5.2, 5.3, 5.3, 5.8, and 5.0, respectively. In the clinical study, AiCE brain CTA was higher CNR and lower CV values compared to other reconstruction parameters. AiCE without dose reduction may be an effective strategy for further improving the image quality of extensor tendons 3D CT. Our study suggests that the AiCE brain CTA is more suitable for extensor tendons 3D CT compared to other AiCE parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hand and wrist is a routine MRI examination and takes about 15-20 minutes, which can lead to problems resulting from the relatively long scan time, such as decreased image quality due to motion artifacts and lower patient throughput. The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the hand and wrist regarding image quality, visualization of anatomy, and diagnostic performance concerning common pathologies. Twenty-one patients (mean age: 43 ± 19 [19-85] years, 10 men, 11 female) were prospectively enrolled in this study between October 2020 and June 2021. Each participant underwent two MRI protocols: first, standard fully sampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a standard GRAPPA reconstruction (TSE S) and second, prospectively undersampled TSE sequences using a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSE DL). Both protocols were acquired consecutively in one examination. Two experienced MSK-imaging radiologists qualitatively evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence, as well as the delineation of anatomical structures (triangular fibrocartilage complex, tendon of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle, extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments, median nerve, cartilage) using a five-point Likert scale and assessed common pathologies. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the sequences. Overall image quality, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, and diagnostic confidence of TSE DL were rated to be comparable to TSE S (p > 0.05). Additionally, TSE DL showed decreased image noise (4.90, median 5, IQR 5-5) compared to TSE S (4.52, median 5, IQR 4-5, p < 0.05) and improved edge sharpness (TSE DL : 4.10, median 4, IQR 3.5-5; TSE S : 3.57, median 4, IQR 3-4; p < 0.05). Inter- and intrareader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.632-1.000) for the detection of common pathologies. Time of acquisition could be reduced by more than 60% with the protocol using TSE DL. Compared to TSE S, TSE DL provided decreased noise and increased edge sharpness, equal image quality, delineation of anatomical structures, detection of pathologies, and diagnostic confidence. Therefore, TSE DL may be clinically relevant for hand and wrist imaging, as it reduces examination time by more than 60%, thus increasing patient comfort and patient throughput. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our objective was to compare the image quality of coronary CT angiography reconstructed with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) and with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) images. This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography using a 320-detector-row CT scanner. The CT images were reconstructed with hybrid IR and SR-DLR. The standard deviation of the CT number was recorded and the CT attenuation profile across the left main coronary artery was generated to calculate the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and measure the edge rise slope (ERS). Overall image quality was evaluated and plaque detectability was assessed on a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). For reference, invasive coronary angiography of 14 patients was used. The mean image noise on SR-DLR was significantly lower than on hybrid IR images (15.6 vs 22.9 HU; p < 0.01). The mean CNR was significantly higher and the ERS was steeper on SR-DLR- compared to hybrid IR images (CNR: 32.4 vs 20.4, p < 0.01; ERS: 300.0 vs 198.2 HU/mm, p < 0.01). The image quality score was better on SR-DLR- than on hybrid IR images (3.6 vs 3.1; p < 0.01). SR-DLR increased the detectability of plaques with < 50% stenosis (p < 0.01). SR-DLR was superior to hybrid IR with respect to the image noise, the sharpness of coronary artery margins, and plaque detectability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionT2 mapping can characterize peripheral neuropathy and muscle denervation due to axonal damage. Three-dimensional double echo steady-state (DESS) can simultaneously provide 3D qualitative information and T2 maps with equivalent spatial resolution. However, insufficient signal-to-noise ratio may bias DESS-T2 values. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques can reduce noise, and hence may improve quantitation of high-resolution DESS-T2. This study aims to (i) evaluate the effect of DLR methods on DESS-T2 values, and (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of using DESS-T2 maps to differentiate abnormal from normal nerves and muscles in the upper extremities, with abnormality as determined by electromyography.Methods and resultsAnalysis of images from 25 subjects found that DLR decreased DESS-T2 values in abnormal muscles (DLR = 37.71 ± 9.11 msec, standard reconstruction = 38.56 ± 9.44 msec, p = 0.005) and normal muscles (DLR: 27.18 ± 6.34 msec, standard reconstruction: 27.58 ± 6.34 msec, p < 0.001) consistent with a noise reduction bias. Mean DESS-T2, both with and without DLR, was higher in abnormal nerves (abnormal = 75.99 ± 38.21 msec, normal = 35.10 ± 9.78 msec, p < 0.001) and muscles (abnormal = 37.71 ± 9.11 msec, normal = 27.18 ± 6.34 msec, p < 0.001). A higher DESS-T2 in muscle was associated with electromyography motor unit recruitment (p < 0.001).DiscussionThese results suggest that quantitative DESS-T2 is improved by DLR and can differentiate the nerves and muscles involved in peripheral neuropathies from those uninvolved.

PURPOSEDeep learning reconstruction (DLR) to improve imaging quality has already been introduced, but no studies have evaluated the effect of DLR on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in in vitro or in vivo studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of DLR for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of image quality improvement, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) assessment, and IVIM index evaluation on DWI through in vitro and in vivo studies.METHODSFor the in vitro study, a phantom recommended by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance was scanned and reconstructed with and without DLR, and 15 patients with brain tumors with normal-appearing gray and white matter examined using IVIM and reconstructed with and without DLR were included in the in vivo study. The ADCs of all phantoms for DWI with and without DLR, as well as the coefficient of variation percentage (CV%), and ADCs and IVIM indexes for each participant, were evaluated based on DWI with and without DLR by means of region-of-interest measurements. For the in vitro study, using the mean ADCs for all phantoms, a t-test was adopted to compare DWI with and without DLR. For the in vivo study, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the CV% between the two types of DWI. In addition, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the ADC, true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and percentage of water molecules in micro perfusion within 1 voxel (f) with and without DLR; the limits of agreement of each parameter were determined through a Bland–Altman analysis.RESULTSThe in vitro study identified no significant differences between the ADC values for DWI with and without DLR (P > 0.05), and the CV% was significantly different for DWI with and without DLR (P < 0.05) when b values ≥250 s/mm2 were used. The in vivo study revealed that D* and f with and without DLR were significantly different (P < 0.001). The limits of agreement of the ADC, D, and D* values for DWI with and without DLR were determined as 0.00 ± 0.51 × 10-3, 0.00 ± 0.06 × 10-3, and 1.13 ± 4.04 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. The limits of agreement of the f values for DWI with and without DLR were determined as −0.01 ± 0.07.CONCLUSIONDeep learning reconstruction for MRI has the potential to significantly improve DWI quality at higher b values. It has some effect on D* and f values in the IVIM index evaluation, but ADC and D values are less affected by DLR.

In this study, we assess image quality in computed tomography scans reconstructed via DLIR (Deep Learning Image Reconstruction) and compare it with iterative reconstruction ASIR-V (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction) in CT (computed tomography) scans of the head. The CT scans of 109 patients were subjected to both objective and subjective evaluation of image quality. The objective evaluation was based on the SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) and CNR (contrast-to-noise ratio) of the brain’s gray and white matter. The regions of interest for our study were set in the BGA (basal ganglia area) and PCF (posterior cranial fossa). Simultaneously, a subjective assessment of image quality, based on brain structure visibility, was conducted by experienced radiologists. In the assessed scans, we obtained up to a 54% increase in SNR for gray matter and a 60% increase for white matter using DLIR in comparison to ASIR-V. Moreover, we achieved a CNR increment of 58% in the BGA structures and 50% in the PCF. In the subjective assessment of the obtained images, DLIR had a mean rating score of 2.8, compared to the mean score of 2.6 for ASIR-V images. In conclusion, DLIR shows improved image quality compared to the standard iterative reconstruction of CT images of the head.

ABSTRACT: Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging is still limited by long acquisition times. This study evaluated the clinical utility of an accelerated two-dimensional (2D) cine sequence with deep learning reconstruction (Sonic DL) to decrease acquisition time without compromising quantitative volumetry or image quality. Methods: A sub-study using 16 participants was performed using Sonic DL at two different acceleration factors (8× and 12×). Quantitative left-ventricular volumetry, function, and mass measurements were compared between the two acceleration factors against a standard cine method. Following this sub-study, 108 participants were prospectively recruited and imaged using a standard cine method and the Sonic DL method with the acceleration factor that more closely matched the reference method. Two experienced clinical readers rated images based on their diagnostic utility and performed all image contouring. Quantitative contrast difference and endocardial border sharpness were also assessed. Left- and right-ventricular volumetry, left-ventricular mass, and myocardial strain measurements were compared between cine methods using Bland-Altman plots, Pearson’s correlation, and paired t-tests. Comparative analysis of image quality was measured using Wilcoxon-signed-rank tests and visualized using bar graphs. Results: Sonic DL at an acceleration factor of 8 more closely matched the reference cine method. There were no significant differences found across left ventricular volumetry, function, or mass measurements. In contrast, an acceleration factor of 12 resulted in a 6% (5.51/90.16) reduction of measured ejection fraction when compared to the standard cine method and a 4% (4.32/88.98) reduction of measured ejection fraction when compared to Sonic DL at an acceleration factor of 8. Thus, Sonic DL at an acceleration factor of 8 was chosen for downstream analysis. In the larger cohort, this accelerated cine sequence was successfully performed in all participants and significantly reduced the acquisition time of cine images compared to the standard 2D method (reduction of 37% (5.98/16) p 0.05). Left- and right-ventricular volumetry and circumferential and radial strain were also similar between methods (p > 0.05) but left-ventricular mass and longitudinal strain were over-estimated using the proposed accelerated cine method (mass over-estimated by 3.36 g/m2, p

Background and Purpose: In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) is excluded. The method relies entirely on synthetic CT images generated from MRI. This study evaluates the compatibility of a commercial synthetic CT (sCT) with an accelerated commercial deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in MRI-only prostate radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: For a group of 24 patients (cohort 1) the effects of DLR were studied in isolation. MRI data were reconstructed conventionally and with DLR from identical k-space data, and sCTs were generated for both reconstructions. The sCT quality, Hounsfield Unit (HU) and dosimetric impact were investigated. In another group of 15 patients (cohort 2) effects on sCT generation using accelerated MRI acquisition (40 % time reduction) reconstructed with DLR were investigated. Results: sCT images from both cohorts, generated from DLR MRI data, were of clinically expected image quality. The mean dose differences for targets and organs at risks in cohort 1 were

Objectives: Hip MRI using standard multiplanar sequences requires long scan times. Accelerating MRI is accompanied by reduced image quality. This study aimed to compare standard two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with accelerated 2D TSE sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (TSEDL) for routine clinical hip MRI at 1.5 and 3 T in terms of feasibility, image quality, and diagnostic performance. Material and Methods: In this prospective, monocentric study, TSEDL was implemented clinically and evaluated in 14 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing a clinically indicated hip MRI at 1.5 and 3T between October 2020 and May 2021. Each patient underwent two examinations: For the first exam, we used standard sequences with generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSES). For the second exam, we implemented prospectively undersampled TSE sequences with DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists assessed the TSEDL and TSES regarding image quality, artifacts, noise, edge sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using an ordinal five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = moderate; 4 = good; 5 = excellent). Both sequences were compared regarding the detection of common pathologies of the hip. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between TSEDL and TSES. Results: Compared with TSES, TSEDL was rated to be significantly superior in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.020) with significantly reduced noise (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly improved edge sharpness (p = 0.003). No difference was found between TSES and TSEDL concerning the extent of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, or the delineation of anatomical structures (p > 0.05). Example acquisition time reductions for the TSE sequences of 52% at 3 Tesla and 70% at 1.5 Tesla were achieved. Conclusion: TSEDL of the hip is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared with TSES, reducing the acquisition time significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Craniofacial computed tomography (CT) is the diagnostic investigation of choice for craniosynostosis, but high radiation dose remains a concern. Objective: To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of an ultra-low-dose craniofacial CT protocol with deep learning reconstruction for diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Materials and methods: All children who underwent initial craniofacial CT for suspected craniosynostosis between September 2021 and September 2022 were included in the study. The ultra-low-dose craniofacial CT protocol using 70 kVp, model-based iterative reconstruction and deep learning reconstruction techniques was compared with a routine-dose craniofacial CT protocol. Quantitative analysis of the signal-to-noise ratio and noise was performed. The 3-dimensional (D) volume-rendered images were independently evaluated by two radiologists with regard to surface coarseness, step-off artifacts and overall image quality on a 5-point scale. Sutural patency was assessed for each of six sutures. Radiation dose was compared between the two protocols. Results: Among 29 patients (15 routine-dose CT and 14 ultra-low-dose CT), 23 patients had craniosynostosis. The 3-D volume-rendered images of ultra-low-dose CT without deep learning showed decreased image quality compared to routine-dose CT. The 3-D volume-rendered images of ultra-low-dose CT with deep learning reconstruction showed higher noise level, higher surface coarseness but decreased step-off artifacts, comparable signal-to-noise ratio and overall similar image quality compared to the routine-dose CT images. Diagnostic performance for detecting craniosynostosis at the suture level showed no significant difference between ultra-low-dose CT without deep learning reconstruction, ultra-low-dose CT with deep learning reconstruction and routine-dose CT. The estimated effective radiation dose for the ultra-low-dose CT was 0.05 mSv (range, 0.03–0.06 mSv), a 95% reduction in dose over the routine-dose CT at 1.15 mSv (range, 0.54–1.74 mSv). This radiation dose is comparable to 4-view skull radiography (0.05–0.1 mSv) and lower than previously reported effective dose for craniosynostosis protocols (0.08–3.36 mSv). Conclusion: In this pilot study, an ultra-low-dose CT protocol using radiation doses at a level similar to skull radiographs showed preserved diagnostic performance for craniosynostosis, but decreased image quality compared to the routine-dose CT protocol. However, by combining the ultra-low-dose CT protocol with deep learning reconstruction, image quality was improved to a level comparable to the routine-dose CT protocol, without sacrificing diagnostic performance for craniosynostosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of the study is to demonstrate that with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in computed tomography (CT), radiation doses of CT kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) and CT urogram (CTU) can be reduced to less than that of X-ray KUB and CT KUB, respectively, while maintaining the good image quality. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all CT KUBs (n = 121) performed in September 2019 and all CTUs (n = 74) performed in December 2019 at our institution. The dose length product (DLP) of all CT KUBs and each individual phase of CTU were recorded. DLP of each scan done with new scanner (Canon Aquilion One Genesis with AiCE [CAOG]) which uses AI and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) were compared against traditional non-AI scanner (GE OPTIMA 660 [GEO-660]). We also compared DLPs of both scanners against the United Kingdom, National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRL) for CT. Results: One hundred and twenty-one patient's CT KUBs and 74 patient's CTUs were reviewed. For CT KUB group, the mean DLP of 81/121 scans done using AI/DLR scanner (CAOG) was 77.8 mGy cm (1.16 mSv), while the mean DLP of 40/121 CT KUB done with GEO-660 was 317.1 mGy cm (4.75 mSv). For CTU group, the mean DLP for 46/74 scans done using AI/DLR scanner (CAOG) was 401.9 mGy cm (6 mSv), compared to mean DLP of 1352.6 mGy cm (20.2 mSv) from GEO-660. Conclusion: We propose that CT scanners using AI/DLR method have the potential of reducing radiation doses of CT KUB and CTU to such an extent that it heralds the extinction of plain film XR KUB for follow-up of urinary tract stones. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing CT KUB and CTU doses from new scanners utilizing AI/DLR technology with traditional scanners using hybrid iterative reconstruction technology. Moreover, we have shown that this technology can markedly reduce the cumulative radiation burden in all urological patients undergoing CT examinations, whether this is CT KUB or CTU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]