Search

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is currently curable in 85–95% of patients. Treatment regimens frequently used include RCHOP ± radiotherapy, DAEPOCH-R, or occasionally more intensive protocols. Here we present results of treatment of 124 patients with PMBL over a period between 2004 and 2017 with the use of a protocol designed for aggressive B-cell lymphoma GMALL/B-ALL/NHL2002 including 6 cycles of alternating immunochemotherapy with intermediate-dose methotrexate in each cycle, and reduced total doxorubicin dose (100 mg/m2 for whole treatment). Majority of patients (77%) received consolidative radiotherapy. A median (range) age of patients was 30 (18–59) years, and 60% were female. With a median (range) follow up of 9 (1–17) years, 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year progression free survival (PFS) were 94% and 92%, respectively. Positron emission tomography—computed tomography (PET-CT) results at the end of chemotherapy were predictive for outcome: OS and PFS at 5 year were 96% and 94% in PET-CT negative patients, respectively, and 70% and 70% in PET-CT-positive patients (p = 0.004 for OS, p = 0.01 for PFS). Eight (6%) patients had recurrent/refractory disease, however, no central nervous system (CNS) relapse was observed. Acute toxicity included pancytopenia grade 3/4, neutropenic fever, and treatment related mortality rate of 0.8%. Second malignancies and late cardiotoxicity occurred in 2.4% and 2.4% of patients, respectively. Intensive alternating immunochemotherapy protocol GMALL/B-ALL/NHL2002 is curative for more than 90% of PMBL patients and late toxicity in young patients is moderated. The attenuated dose of doxorubicin and intermediate dose of methotrexate may contribute to low incidence of late cardiotoxicity and effective CNS prophylaxis.

Plerixafor + granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is administered to patients with lymphoma who are poor mobilizers of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in Europe. This international, multicenter, non-interventional registry study (NCT01362972) evaluated long-term follow-up of patients with lymphoma who received plerixafor for HSC mobilization versus other mobilization methods. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between comparison groups. The following mobilization regimens were compared: G-CSF + plerixafor (G + P) versus G-CSF alone; G + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G + C); and G-CSF + plerixafor + chemotherapy (G + P + C) versus G + C. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Overall, 313/3749 (8.3%) eligible patients were mobilized with plerixafor-containing regimens. After propensity score matching, 70 versus 36 patients were matched in the G + P versus G-CSF alone cohort, 124 versus 124 in the G + P versus G + C cohort, and 130 versus 130 in the G + P + C versus G + C cohort. For both PFS and OS, the upper bound of confidence interval for the hazard ratio was >1.3 for all comparisons, implying that non-inferiority was not demonstrated. No major differences in PFS, OS, and CIR were observed between the plerixafor and comparison groups.

Introduction: Obinutuzumab-based induction immunochemotherapy was demonstrated to improve the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) comparing to the regimens with rituximab in GALLIUM study (NCT01332968). The infusion related reactions (IRRs) occur in more than half of FL patients during the first obinutuzumab administration. Therefore, during the whole treatment period infusions lasting more than 3-4 hours are so far recommended. Shorter infusions would be more convenient for both patients and medical staff and could also contribute to the shorter hospitalization that is desirable during COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to evaluate the tolerance and early efficacy of obinutuzumab-based regimens in FL patients in clinical practice. Methods: We evaluated tolerability of obinutuzumab infusions and response rates to different regimens of chemotherapy combined with obinutuzumab in consecutive FL patients treated in hemato-oncology centers in Poland from Jan 2020 to Jan 2021. Obinutuzumab was combined with CHOP, CVP or bendamustine according to the treating physician choice. Obinutuzumab maintenance was offered to the patients who achieved at least partial response (PR) after induction immunochemotherapy. Response was evaluated with computed tomography or positron emission tomography according to 2014 Lugano criteria. Adverse events were assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria (version 5). Results: The study group included 129 treatment-naive FL patients. The median age (range) was 52 (29 - 90) years, 35.7% of patients were males. According to FLIPI 46.5 % of patients were classified as high risk, 33.3% as intermediate and 20.2% as low risk, whereas 33.7%, 30.4% and 35.9% of patients were in PRIMA PI high, intermediate and low risk groups, respectively, Table 1. Median number of GELF criteria was 2 (range 1-6). Induction chemotherapy included: CVP in 48.1% (n=62), CHOP in 29.5% (n=38) and Benda in 22.5% (n=29) of patients. Median number of cycles was 6 (range 1 - 8). Maintenance was started in 85 patients (76.6%). The first obinutuzumab dose was administered as a single infusion during the first day of the first cycle in 43.4% of patients (n=56), whereas 56.6 % (n=73) of patients had initial infusion divided into 2 days (100 mg and 900 mg). During the first cycle 93.8% (n=121) of patients received three doses of obinutuzumab. The doses were omitted in 8 patients: in 4 due to Covid-19, in 1 due to pneumonia and neutropenia and in 3 cases due to neutropenia. IRRs were reported during the first Obinutuzumab administration in 10.1% of patients (n=13, grade 1/2 in 11 and grade 3 in 2 patients): in 7 patients who received obinutuzumab initial dose in single infusion and in 6 patients who received first obinutuzumab dose divided in two days. Median time of the first infusions was 4 hours and 55 min (range 1:30 - 9:45). There were no IRRs reported during the subsequent obinutuzumab infusions. The most common adverse event was neutropenia with grade 3/4 events reported in 51.1% of patients (n=66). G-CSF support was given in 70.4% (n = 81/115), and as the primary prophylaxis in 42.6 % (n=49) of patients. The SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 19 patients regardless of initial chemotherapy regimen. After induction immunochemotherapy complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progression disease (PD) rates were: 71.8%, 23.9%, 0.9% and 3.4%, respectively, Table 2. With a median follow up of 8.7 months 5 patients (3.9%) relapsed, 4 died due to COVID infection. There were no deaths caused by FL. Conclusions: In our study obinutuzumab-based induction treatment was well tolerated. The low incidence and low grade of infusion related reactions in most of the patients, reported only during the first infusion, support the practice of administration of the first obinutuzumab dose in a single infusion. For convenience, the concept of short, 90 minutes infusion of Obinutuzumab starting from the second cycle could be considered (Canales MA, EHA 2021). During COVID-19 pandemic using obinutuzumab with chemotherapy is feasible and justified by the high response rate to this treatment. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Paszkiewicz-Kozik: Roche: Honoraria, Other: congress fee; Servier: Other: congress fee; gillead: Other: travel grant; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants. Hus: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Romejko-Jarosinska: roche: Other: congress fee; servier: Other: congress fee; gilead: Other: traver grant. Drozd-Sokolowska: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dlugosz-Danecka: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corp.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Lech-Marańda: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Walewski: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria.

e20034 Background: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare CD20-negative lymphoma with an aggressive clinical course and short median survival ranging from 9 to 32 months. It is often associated with HIV infection but it also affects immunocompetent patients. Due to the rare occurrence most data comes from small, retrospective series. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of PBL patients (pts) referred to MSCNRIO between 2003-2019. Diagnosis was established according to the WHO 2017 classification criteria. Kaplan–Meier method was used for calculating overall survival (OS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) and the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors was carried out. Results: 24 pts with a diagnosis of PBL were included. The median age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 29-90). 15 pts (63%) were men. LDH was elevated in 10 pts (41%). Stage III or IV was reported in 21 (87.5%) pts, IPI score of 3-5 in 12 (50%) and ECOG performance status > 1 in 7 pts (29%). 20 pts (83.3%) had extranodal involvement, including oropharynx (n = 12), gastrointestinal tract (n = 1), bone marrow (n = 7), skeletal bone (n = 9), central nervous system (n = 3), skin and subcutaneous tissue (n = 2). Only 3 pts (13%) were infected by HIV, 2 had history of immunosuppressive therapy. Pathologically, all cases were negative for CD20 and positive for CD38 or CD138 expression. Ki67 > 90% was noted in 16 cases (66%). 11 pts received CHOP chemotherapy, 3 pts - thalidomide- and 4 pts - bortezomib-based regimens, 1 was treated with both agents. 4 pts received different protocols; 1 pt received no treatment. CR was observed in 8 pts (33%), PR in 6 (25%) and no response in 10 (42%). 2 pts received ASCT in the 1st remission. 17 pts (71%) experienced relapsed/progressive disease. 16 pts died: 11 from disease progression, 2 from other neoplasm. With a median follow-up of 20 months (range 2-122) median OS was 21 months and 2-year OS rate was 46% (95%C.I 27%, 65%). 2-year PFS rate was 37% (95% C.I. 17%, 57%), with median PFS 12 months (range 0.7-105). On univariate analysis there was a trend for correlation of high IPI with PFS; (95%C.I 0.99-1.03, P= 0.08). Achieving CR significantly correlated with better OS (HR 5; 95% C.I. 1.41-17; P= 0.01)) and PFS (HR 5.1, 95%C.I. 1.4, 18; P= 0.004). Conclusions: Our results confirm other reported data on PBL. Patients in our cohort shared typical clinical features but majority of them were immunocompetent. PBL prognosis remains poor despite incorporating novel agents into treatment and requires new therapeutic approaches.

Recent case reports provided alarming signals that treatment with bortezomib might be associated with cardiac events. In all reported cases, patients experiencing cardiac problems were previously or concomitantly treated with other chemotherapeutics including cardiotoxic anthracyclines. Therefore, it is difficult to distinguish which components of the therapeutic regimens contribute to cardiotoxicity. Here, we addressed the influence of bortezomib on cardiac function in rats that were not treated with other drugs. Rats were treated with bortezomib at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg thrice weekly. Echocardiography, histopathology, and electron microscopy were used to evaluate cardiac function and structural changes. Respiration of the rat heart mitochondria was measured polarographically. Cell culture experiments were used to determine the influence of bortezomib on cardiomyocyte survival, contractility, Ca(2+) fluxes, induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress, and autophagy. Our findings indicate that bortezomib treatment leads to left ventricular contractile dysfunction manifested by a significant drop in left ventricle ejection fraction. Dramatic ultrastructural abnormalities of cardiomyocytes, especially within mitochondria, were accompanied by decreased ATP synthesis and decreased cardiomyocyte contractility. Monitoring of cardiac function in bortezomib-treated patients should be implemented to evaluate how frequently cardiotoxicity develops especially in patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions, as well as when using additional cardiotoxic drugs.

7560 Background: 2016 update of the WHO 2008 classification of lymphoid neoplasms introduced new categories of highly aggressive B lymphomas (BCL): high grade B lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBLR) and HGBL not otherwise specified (NOS). The prognosis for HGBL is generally considered poor, the optimal therapy is unknown. Here we evaluated outcome after first line treatment in patients with a diagnosis of HGBLR, HGBL, NOS, and DLBCL at our institution. Methods: Medical records of 591 consecutive patients with aggressive BCL were evaluated, archived pathology reports and samples were reviewed, diagnosis revised if necessary according to 2016 update of WHO classification. We identified 16 cases of HGBLR (3%), 26 cases of HGBL, NOS (4%), and 565 cases of DLBCL (93%). Response to first line therapy, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated and compared between these three entities. Results: DLBCL patients were treated with RCHOP between 2005-2012, HGBL patients were treated between 2005-2016 with RDAEPOCH (n = 31, 5%), RCHOP or other regimens. For the first line treatment in patients with DLBCL, HGBLR and HGBL NOS, the overall response/complete response rate was 92%/75%, 81%/56%, 93%/65%, respectively (p = NS). After a median (range) follow up of 42(1-155) months, median PFS and OS for DLBCL was not reached. For both HGBLR and HGLB, NOS patients median PFS was 10 months, median OS was 16 months. The HR for risk of progression in patients with HGBLR vs DLBCL and HGBL NOS vs DLBCL was 2.4 (1.1-4.7), p = 0.01 and 2.0 (1.1-3.5), p = 0.01. The HR for risk of death, for HGBLR vs DLBCL and HGLB NOS vs DLBCL was 2.59(1.32-5.07), p < 0.01 and 1.8(0.9-3.3), p = 0.08. The risk of progression and the risk of death in HGBLR vs HGBL, NOS was similar, for PFS: 1.08 (0.46- 2.5), p = NS for OS: 1.2 (0.5 -3,1) p = NS. Conclusions: Our data confirms reports by others on poor prognosis for patients with a diagnosis of HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements as well as HGBL, NOS with an increased risk of death and risk of progression compared to DLBCL patients. There was no difference in outcome between HGBL-R and HGBL, NOS patients in our series.

Background: MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 are known to be altered in high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL). Double/triple-hit lymphomas (D/THLs) are characterized by chromosomal rearrangementsof MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6. D/THLs have been included in the updated 2016 WHO classification, as a new category of "High grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements" (HGBL-R) or Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) entity, depending on morphology/cytogenetic features. BCL2 protein is expressed in a much higher proportion of DLBCL and HGBL, not otherwise specified (HGBL,NOS), and is often associated with a concomitant expression of MYC and BCL6. Most of HGBLs do not carry BCL2/MYC/BCL6 rearrangements and are referred to as "double/triple-expressor lymphomas" (D/TELs). D/THLs patients usually progress rapidly, are resistant to R-CHOP immunochemotherapy, and have very poor prognosis. D/TELs also have a worse outcome than other DLBCL,NOS. BCL2 overexpression is observed in both germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) and non-GCB HGBL. We have previously described a diagnostic algorithm for subtypes of HGBL based on flow-cytometry immunphenotyping (FCM) with CD38 overexpression, which correlates with MYC rearrangement assessed in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) samples. Here, we propose that patients with HGBL/DLBCL,NOS, with BCL2 overexpression, especially those with D/THLs and D/TELs, may benefit from DA-EPOCH-R (dose-adjusted cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, prednisone with rituximab) treatment. Methods: 30 patients (male/female 18/12, median age/range 51/35-76/) diagnosed with DLBCL,NOS (13 pts), HGBL-R (11 pts), HGBL,NOS (2 pts), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma - PMBL (3 pts) and DLBCL,leg type (1 pt), based on 2016 WHO classification, were treated with DA-EPOCH-R as first-line therapybetween January 2015 - July 2016. Clinical stage III or IV and IPI 3 or more were found in 27 pts (90%) and 22 pts (73%), respectively. All cases were evaluated by histopathological/immunohistochemical/flow-cytometry examination (HP/IHC/FCM), with panels of antibodies, including also CD5/CD10/CD20/CD38/BCL2/BCL6/MYC. In most cases, MYC, BCL2, BCL6 and, in case of relapse, also TP53 status was evaluated by karyotyping (CC) and FISH. Results: Considering the cell-of-origin, there were 20 pts with GCB, 3 non-GCB, 4 CD5+ and 3 PMBL. In addition, 15 pts were DEL, 12 - TEL, 3 - one-expressor lymphoma, 8 - D/THL, 12 - one-hit lymphoma and 10 - non-hit lymphoma, mostly with BCL2 overexpression. Karyotype was successfully assessed in 70%, while BCL2 overexpression was found in 83% of HGBL pts. MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangement was found in 48%, 35% and 21%, respectively. In 50%, 46% and 54% of cases there was an increase in copy number/amplification of MYC, BCL2 and BCL6, respectively. In 15 evaluable pts., overall and complete response was 80% and 53%, respectively. Median follow-up of HGBL pts treated with DA-EPOCH-R was 5 months (range 1-17), and the probability of one year overall survival was 91%, 95% C.I. (80%,100%). Progression free survival at 1 year was 62%, 95C.I. (36%,90%). 3 of 4 patients with progressive disease had TP53 deletion. The main toxicity was pancytopenia with neutropenia grade 3 or more in 24 pts (80%). Treatment-related mortality due to septic shock occurred in 2 patients (7%). Conclusions: DA-EPOCH-R regimen shows a promising activity considering D/THL and D/TEL-associated drug resistance. DA-EPOCH-R regimen seems to overcome drug resistance associated with BCL2/MYC/BCL6 overexpression, but not with TP53 deletion. Combining HP/IHC with FNAB/FCM/CC/FISH is a reliable method for D/THL and D/TEL diagnosis but the most sensitive method for fast MYC/BCL2 rearrangement assessment in DHL is FNAB/FCM CD38 and BCL2 overexpression. Disclosures Rymkiewicz: Takeda: Other: travel, accommodation; Roche: Other: travel, accommodation. Romejko-Jarosinska:Celgene: Other: travel, accommodation; Servier: Other: travel, accommodation; Sanofi- Aventis: Other: travel, accommodation. Paszkiewicz-Kozik:Sandos: Other: fee; Hospira: Other: fee; Sanofi: Other: accommodation; Roche: Other: travel, accommodation. Domanska-Czyz:Roche: Other: travel, accommodation; Amgen: Other: travel, accommodation. Ostrowska:Roche: Other: travel, accommodation; Amgen: Other: travel, accommodation. Dabrowska-Iwanicka:Genzyme: Other: travel, accommodation; Roche: Other: travel, accommodation. Osowiecki:Sandoz: Other: travel, accommodation; Roche: Other: travel, accommodation. Sikorska-Mali:Roche: Other: travel, accommodation. Szymanski:Stada: Other: travel, accommodation. Swierkowska-Czeneszew:Stada: Other: travel, accommodation; Roche: Other: travel, accommodation; Amgen: Other: travel, accommodation. Prochorec-Sobieszek:Roche: Other: travel, accommodation. Walewski:Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; GSK/Novartis: Research Funding; Genetics: Other: travel, accommodation; Sanofi: Other: travel, accommodation.

Purpose. To investigate antitumour efficacy of the combination of the antiangiogenic agent TNP-470 combined with chemoimmunotherapy in different tumour models in mice Materials. B6D2F1 mice and BALB/c mice were inoculated in the footpad of the right hind limb with B16F10 melanoma cells or colon adenocarcinoma cells C-26, respectively. Subsequently, they received therapy consisting of TNP-470 and/or IL-12 and tumour growth was observed. In the melanoma model this therapy regimen was combined with cisplatin in a subtherapeutic dose. The antiangiogenic action of the tested agents was evaluated using tumour-induced angiogenesis assay in vivo. In order to analyse interactions between TNP-470 (or cisplatin) and IFN-γ on tumour cells in vitro, the following methods were used: MTT assay, Western blot analysis, and flow cytometry analysis. Results. Administration of the combined therapy with TNP-470 and IL-12 resulted in augmented antitumour activity in colon-26 and B16F10 melanoma models. Addition of cisplatin further enhanced efficacy of this combined therapy in the melanoma model. We showed that antitumour activity of this combined therapy is mediated by multiple mechanisms: not only is enhancement of the antiangiogenic activity mediated by TNP-470 and IL-12 but also by the synergistic cytostatic/cytotoxic action of IL-12-induced IFN-γ and TNP-470 or cisplatin on tumour cells. The experiments revealed that TNP-470 together with IFN-γ leads to the increased expression of p21 protein in cancer cells, which in turn may contribute to their cytostatic/cytotoxic action in vitro. Conclusion. Our experiments show a successful TNP-470-based combination therapy and suggest that the enhancement of the antitumour activity could be explained by a concomitant effect on both endothelial and tumour cell compartments.

e19549 Background: Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a distinct entity of large B-cell lymphoma representing 2%–4% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The treatment based on rituximab (R) plus ...