Back to Search Start Over

Analysis of data collected in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry on a cohort of lymphoma patients receiving plerixafor

Authors :
Cyrille Touzeau
Silvia Montoto
Ariane Boumendil
Marina Celanovic
Albert Esquirol
Ioanna Sakellari
Peter Dreger
David Pohlreich
Nigel H. Russell
Anna Sureda
Paul Bosman
Qianying Liu
Christian Chabannon
Esa Jantunen
Andrea Janíková
Anna Dabrowska-Iwanicka
Christof Scheid
Steffie van der Werf
Björn E. Wahlin
Catherine Thieblemont
Tamás Masszi
Source :
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2020.

Abstract

Plerixafor + granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is administered to patients with lymphoma who are poor mobilizers of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in Europe. This international, multicenter, non-interventional registry study (NCT01362972) evaluated long-term follow-up of patients with lymphoma who received plerixafor for HSC mobilization versus other mobilization methods. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between comparison groups. The following mobilization regimens were compared: G-CSF + plerixafor (G + P) versus G-CSF alone; G + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G + C); and G-CSF + plerixafor + chemotherapy (G + P + C) versus G + C. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Overall, 313/3749 (8.3%) eligible patients were mobilized with plerixafor-containing regimens. After propensity score matching, 70 versus 36 patients were matched in the G + P versus G-CSF alone cohort, 124 versus 124 in the G + P versus G + C cohort, and 130 versus 130 in the G + P + C versus G + C cohort. For both PFS and OS, the upper bound of confidence interval for the hazard ratio was >1.3 for all comparisons, implying that non-inferiority was not demonstrated. No major differences in PFS, OS, and CIR were observed between the plerixafor and comparison groups.

Details

ISSN :
02683369
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau, instname, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6d258ee8e4d1fe2cc3f09f82ad7b7bcf