Search

Background: Sarcoidosis is an idiopathic systemic granulomatosis whose evolution is self-limiting in most cases. However, it can progress to organ damage that menaces the vital or functional prognosis of patients. Sarcoidosis itself, but also its comorbidities, can pose a threat to the patient, require rapid initiation of treatment, and justify emergency hospitalization., Research Question: What are the reasons and prognosis of patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency?, Study Design and Methods: The objectives of our study were to describe the causes of admission for and to identify predictors of mortality in patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency. This is a retrospective monocentric study. We included patients hospitalized after a stay in the ED or ICU, or requiring an unscheduled hospitalization after telephone advice or a consultation, between January 1, 2017, and July 7, 2020., Results: We identified 154 patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency, among which 14 (9%) required the ICU. There were 81 male patients, with a median age of 55.0 years (interquartile range, 44.0-67.0). Sarcoidosis was inaugural in 20 patients (14%). The primary reason for hospitalization was lower respiratory infections in 32 patients (21%), followed by acute pulmonary exacerbation of sarcoidosis in 17 (11%), suspected cardiac sarcoidosis in 13 (8.4%), and neurosarcoidosis in 12 (7.7%). The median length of stay was 6 days (interquartile range, 3.00-10.0). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.9%. The 2-year transplantation-free survival after hospitalization was 86.8% (95% CI, 81.4-92.5). The factors associated with a worse transplantation-free survival were Charlson Comorbidity Index score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.61; P = .021), pulmonary hypertension (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.10-5.83; P = .029), and oxygen therapy during hospitalization (HR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.55-11.29; P = .005)., Interpretation: Our findings indicate that the overall mortality of patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency was high. The presence of comorbidities and the severity of respiratory failure, as reflected by oxygen requirement, are important prognostic determinants., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several rare surfactant-related gene (SRG) variants associated with interstitial lung disease are suspected to be associated with lung cancer, but data are missing. We aimed to study the epidemiology and phenotype of lung cancer in an international cohort of SRG variant carriers., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all adults with SRG variants in the OrphaLung network and compared lung cancer risk with telomere-related gene (TRG) variant carriers., Results: We identified 99 SRG adult variant carriers ( SFTPA1 (n=18), SFTPA2 (n=31), SFTPC (n=24), ABCA3 (n=14) and NKX2-1 (n=12)), including 20 (20.2%) with lung cancer ( SFTPA1 (n=7), SFTPA2 (n=8), SFTPC (n=3), NKX2-1 (n=2) and ABCA3 (n=0)). Among SRG variant carriers, the odds of lung cancer was associated with age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), smoking (OR 20.7, 95% CI 6.60-76.2) and SFTPA1 / SFTPA2 variants (OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.39-13.2). Adenocarcinoma was the only histological type reported, with programmed death ligand-1 expression ≥1% in tumour cells in three samples. Cancer staging was localised (I/II) in eight (40%) individuals, locally advanced (III) in two (10%) and metastatic (IV) in 10 (50%). We found no somatic variant eligible for targeted therapy. Seven cancers were surgically removed, 10 received systemic therapy, and three received the best supportive care according to their stage and performance status. The median overall survival was 24 months, with stage I/II cancers showing better survival. We identified 233 TRG variant carriers. The comparative risk (subdistribution hazard ratio) for lung cancer in SRG patients versus TRG patients was 18.1 (95% CI 7.1-44.7)., Conclusions: The high risk of lung cancer among SRG variant carriers suggests specific screening and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The benefit of regular computed tomography scan follow-up should be evaluated., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P. Bonniaud reports grants from AstraZeneca, lecture honoraria from Sanofi and AstraZeneca, travel support from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, Boehringer and Stallergenes, and advisory board membership with AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, GSK and Boehringer. J. Cadranel had a patent planned, received consulting fees and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daichi, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Roche and Takeda. A. Cazes reports lecture honoraria and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. B. Crestani reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting fees from Apellis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, lecture honoraria from Apellis, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Sanofi, support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Apellis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, and had a leadership role as President of the Board of Trustees of the Fondation du Souffle. R. Epaud reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, lecture honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca and Menarini, travel support from GSK and AstraZeneca, and advisory board membership with AstraZeneca and Novartis. M-P. Debray reports lecture honoraria and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. E. Manali reports lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, CLS Behring and Hoffman-La Roche, support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, CLS Behring, Hoffman-La Roche and Elpen, and had a leadership role as a Chair in the ERS Task Force for transition of chILD to adult care. S. Papiris reports lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Elpen. N. Nathan reports grants from Legs poix de la Chancellerie des Universités 2022 (number 2022000594). C. Andréjak participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for the EVER-ILD2 study (rituximab in diffuse interstitial pneumonia) and received funding via a grant from the French Research Ministry. S. Jouneau reports grants from AIRB, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, lecture honoraria from AIRB, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Genzyme, GSK, LVL, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and AIRB, and advisory board participation for Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Sanofi. G. Beltramo reports lecture honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, and support for attending meetings or travel from Sanofi Aventis France and Boehringer Ingelheim France. S. Hirschi reports research grants from Agence de la Biomedécine, CSL Behring and Adiral medical assistance, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, travel support from CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim and ISIS Medical, and received medical equipment from ISIS Medical. C. Picard reports lecture honoraria and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. G. Prévot reports honoraria for presentations and educational event from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Jansen and MSD. G. Zalcman reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer and Sanofi, lecture honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca and Sanofi, support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca and BMS, and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca and BMS. V. Cottin reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, CSL Behring, Ferrer/United Therapeutics, GSK, Pliant, Pure Tech, RedX, Roche, Sanofi and Shionogi, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer/United Therapeutics and Roche, support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Galapagos, Galecto and GSK, and had a leadership role in an adjudication committee for Fibrogen. R. Borie reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer and Sanofi, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Chiesi, and advisory board participation for Savara. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Sarcoidosis is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the characteristics and clinical evolution of sarcoidosis patients presenting a VTE (sarcoidosis/VTE group) in the course of their disease are not known. Consequently, if VTE occurrence is associated with a more severe disease is still pending. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of sarcoidosis/VTE patients compared to matched sarcoidosis controls without VTE in two French tertiary centers, analysed and compared the clinical, biological, functional, imaging and evolutive profiles of the two groups. Sixty-one patients were included with at least one episode of VTE during course of sarcoidosis. At sarcoidosis onset (before/at the time of VTE occurrence) the number of affected organs, radiological stages and pulmonary functional tests were not significantly different between the two groups. In contrast, we found that sarcoidosis/VTE patients required more frequently a systemic immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressors, 79% versus 58%; p = 0.008). The functional course was also poorer in sarcoidosis/VTE patients with a more frequent decrease in functional vital capacity (33% versus 18% in sarcoidosis/VTE patients and controls, respectively, p = 0.008). Finally, sarcoidosis/VTE patients presented more frequently with pulmonary hypertension (10% versus 1% in patients and controls, respectively, p = 0.006), and their survival was significantly worse (log-rank p <0.001). The occurrence of VTE during sarcoidosis is associated with a more severe disease and a poorer prognosis. The occurrence of VTE during sarcoidosis might signal a more inflammatory and/or evolutive disease in sarcoidosis/VTE patients and should be taken in consideration when designing therapeutic strategies for them., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Air pollution is an environmental risk for the general population and for patients with various diseases, particularly respiratory diseases. Little data are available on personal exposure, but the recent emergence of low-cost air quality sensors (LCSs) should enable a better understanding of the health impacts of air pollution at the individual level. However, the reliability and accuracy of most sensors in the market have not been established, and a thorough understanding of their strengths and limitations is needed. We therefore conducted a review to address the following questions: 1) What is an LCS and what is the extent of its possible application? 2) Is the data obtained a reliable indicator of exposure? 3) What are the advantages and disadvantages of LCSs? 4) Could LCSs be useful in investigating the impact of air pollution on respiratory health? Further studies are needed to promote the use of LCS in research settings and among respiratory patients. This will allow us to monitor exposure levels, provide alerts and study the respiratory effects of individual-level air pollution.

Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis occurs in 30-50% of cases of sarcoidosis, most often in association with pulmonary involvement, and virtually any organ can be involved. Its incidence depends according to the organs considered, clinical phenotype, and history of sarcoidosis, but also on epidemiological factors like age, sex, geographic ancestry, and socio-professional factors. The presentation, symptomatology, organ dysfunction, severity, and lethal risk vary from and to patient even at the level of the same organ. The presentation may be specific or not, and its occurrence is at variable times in the history of sarcoidosis from initial to delayed. There are schematically two types of presentation, one when pulmonary sarcoidosis is first discovered, the problem is then to detect extrapulmonary localizations and to assess their link with sarcoidosis, while the other presentation is when extrapulmonary manifestations are indicative of the disease with the need to promptly make the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. To improve diagnosis accuracy, extrapulmonary manifestations need to be known and a medical strategy is warranted to avoid both under- and over-diagnosis. An accurate estimation of impairment and risk linked to extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is essential to offer the best treatment. Most frequent extrapulmonary localizations are skin lesions, arthritis, uveitis, peripheral lymphadenopathy, and hepatic involvement. Potentially severe involvement may stem from the heart, nervous system, kidney, eye and larynx. There is a lack of randomized trials to support recommendations which are often derived from what is known for lung sarcoidosis and from the natural history of the disease at the level of the respective organ. The treatment needs to be holistic and personalized, taking into account not only extrapulmonary localizations but also lung involvement, parasarcoidosis syndrome if any, symptoms, quality of life, medical history, drugs contra-indications, and potential adverse events and patient preferences. The treatment is based on the use of anti-sarcoidosis drugs, on treatments related to organ dysfunction and supportive treatments. Multidisciplinary discussions and referral to sarcoidosis centers of excellence may be helpful for difficult diagnosis and treatment decisions., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

(1) Background: Systemic granulomatosis developed in a context of malignancy has already been reported. Our objective was to describe the clinical, radiological, functional, biological, and evolutive characteristics of sarcoidosis-like cancer-associated granulomatosis (SLCAG) and to compare them to those of sarcoidosis. (2) Methods: 38 patients with a biopsy-proven SLCAG developed after a diagnostic of malignancy were included. The control group consisted of sarcoidosis patients matched for age, sex, and radiologic stage. Clinical, biological, physiological, radiological, and outcome data were collected. (3) Results: The mean age of SLCAG patients was 51 ± 14 years. They were diagnosed within 15 ± 14 months of the cancer diagnosis (breast cancer most frequently). All SLCAG patients presented a thoracic involvement, extrathoracic locations were observed in 32% of subjects. SLCAG was more often asymptomatic than sarcoidosis ( p < 0.0001). During follow-up, systemic treatment was less often required in SLCAG than in sarcoidosis (58% vs. 32%, p = 0.04 respectively) and SLCAG were characterized by a significantly less severe progression profile according to the Sarcoid Clinical Activity Classification, with a complete recovery more frequent at 5 years ( p = 0.03). (4) Conclusion: This case-control study shows that SLCAG differs from sarcoidosis with a significantly more benign course. These results might argue for true differences in the physiopathology, which remain to be elucidated.

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) can be caused by mutations in the SFTPA1 and SFTPA2 genes, which encode the surfactant protein (SP) complex SP-A. Only 11 SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations have so far been reported worldwide, of which five have been functionally assessed. In the framework of ILD molecular diagnosis, we identified 14 independent patients with pathogenic SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations. The present study aimed to functionally assess the 11 different mutations identified and to accurately describe the disease phenotype of the patients and their affected relatives., Methods: The consequences of the 11 SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations were analysed both in vitro , by studying the production and secretion of the corresponding mutated proteins and ex vivo , by analysing SP-A expression in lung tissue samples. The associated disease phenotypes were documented., Results: For the 11 identified mutations, protein production was preserved but secretion was abolished. The expression pattern of lung SP-A available in six patients was altered and the family history reported ILD and/or lung adenocarcinoma in 13 out of 14 families (93%). Among the 28 SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutation carriers, the mean age at ILD onset was 45 years (range 0.6-65 years) and 48% underwent lung transplantation (mean age 51 years). Seven carriers were asymptomatic., Discussion: This study, which expands the molecular and clinical spectrum of SP-A disorders, shows that pathogenic SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations share similar consequences for SP-A secretion in cell models and in lung tissue immunostaining, whereas they are associated with a highly variable phenotypic expression of disease, ranging from severe forms requiring lung transplantation to incomplete penetrance., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Legendre has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Butt has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and personal fees from Savapharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Bouvry has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Filhol-Blin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Desroziers has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Nau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Copin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Dastot Le Moal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Héry has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Duquesnoy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Allou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Bergeron has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Bermudez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Cazes has been invited to national and international meetings, and/or has received grants and/or personal fees for various activities from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A-L. Chene has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Cottin reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Actelion; grants, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees for advisory board and data monitoring committee work from Bayer/MSD and Galapagos; personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from Novartis; personal fees for lectures, consultancy, data monitoring committee and steering committee work, and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Roche/Promedior; personal fees for lectures from Sanofi and AstraZeneca; personal fees for data monitoring committee work from Celgene and Galecto; and personal fees for advisory board work from Shionogi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-C. Dalphin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Dombret has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Doray has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Dupin reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and non-financial support and meeting invitations from AstraZeneca; personal fees for lectures, non-financial support and meeting invitations from Boehringer and Novartis; personal fees for research and lectures, and non-financial support and meeting invitations from GSK; personal fees for lectures and meeting invitations from Chiesi; personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and non-financial support from Sanofi; and personal fees, non-financial support and meeting invitations from Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V. Giraud has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Gondouin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Gouya has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Israël-Biet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Le Borgne has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Leroy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Longchampt has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Lorillon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Picard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Reynaud-Gaubert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Traclet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. de Vuyst has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Coulomb L'Hermine has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Clement has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Amselem has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Nathan reports a 2018 AstraZeneca Mobility Grant from Société de pneumologie pédiatrique et d'allergologie (France), outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Introduction: Pulmonary fibrosing sarcoidosis is associated with increased mortality. This study was aimed to explore the prognosis value of a panel of parameters for predicting mortality., Methods: This retrospective study included 216 patients with confirmed stage 4 pulmonary sarcoidosis. Stage 4 diagnosis date served as baseline. The following information was systematically present at baseline: epidemiological characteristics; treatments; pulmonary function; composite physiologic index (CPI); systolic pulmonary artery pressure at echocardiography; pulmonary fibrosis extent, main pulmonary artery/ascending aorta diameters ratio (MPAD/AAD) and MPAD/body surface area (BSA) measured and calculated using computed tomography, Walsh's algorithm based on CPI, lung fibrosis extent and MPAD/AAD ratio, and modified Walsh's algorithm with MPAD/BSA replacing MPAD/AAD allowed to estimate good or bad prognosis profiles. The primary outcome of the study was all cause mortality and lung transplantation. The value of baseline parameters was tested as predictors of mortality using univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: Median follow-up was 105 months. There were 41 deaths and 5 transplantations. At multivariate analysis, survival was independently predicted by several parameters including CPI, lung fibrosis extent, pulmonary hypertension at echography or MPAD/BSA ratio, Walsh's algorithm, and geographic origin. The modified Walsh's algorithm was most highly predictive., Conclusion: Survival was best predicted by geographic origin, lung fibrosis extent, PH at echography or MPAD/BSA ratio, as well as by various scores among them the modified Walsh's algorithm had very high predictive value thanks to MPAD/BSA ratio which accurately predicted mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Multiple problems may be encountered during the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: at first diagnose sarcoidosis in an appropriate clinical setting, secondly, identify any manifestation to be linked to sarcoidosis at diagnosis work-up and during evolution; thirdly, recognize "danger" in sarcoidosis and parasarcoidosis syndromes, and finally, diagnose sarcoidosis recovery. Diagnosis is often delayed as presentation may be diverse, non-specific, or atypical. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis is based on three criteria: a compatible presentation; evidence of non-caseating granulomas and exclusion of any alternative diagnosis. However, even when all criteria are fulfilled, the probability of sarcoidosis diagnosis varies from definite to only possible depending upon the presence of more or less characteristic radio-clinical and histopathological findings and on the epidemiological context. Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy and/or diffuse lung micronodules mainly along lymphatics are the most frequent highly suggestive findings. Evidence of granulomas relies on superficial biopsies of clinically suspected lesion when present or most often by bronchial endoscopy. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis may be difficult in absence of thoracic or skin manifestations and may require the benefit of hindsight before being definitive. Differential diagnoses, mainly tuberculosis, must be considered. The diagnosis of events during evolution relies on serial clinical, pulmonary function, radiographic evaluation and on extrapulmonary manifestations work-up, including electrocardiogram and blood biology. Affected organs need to be related to sarcoidosis using an appropriate diagnostic assessment instrument. To declare the recovery of sarcoidosis, all manifestations must have disappeared spontaneously or after 3-5 years post-treatment without relapse., (Copyright © 2019 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genetic testing is proposed for suspected cases of monogenic pulmonary fibrosis, but clinicians and patients need specific information and recommendation about the related diagnosis and management issues. Because multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) has been shown to improve accuracy of interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis, we evaluated the feasibility of a genetic MDD (geneMDD) dedicated to the indication for and interpretation of genetic testing. The geneMDD group met monthly and included pediatric and adult lung specialists with ILD expertise, molecular and clinical geneticists, and one radiologist. Hematologists, rheumatologists, dermatologists, hepatologists, and pathologists were also invited to attend., Results: Since 2016, physicians from 34 different centers in 7 countries have participated in the geneMDD. The medical files of 95 patients (53 males) have been discussed. The median age of patients was 43 years [range 0-77], 10 were ≤ 15 years old, and 6 were deceased at the time of the discussion. Among 85 analyses available, the geneMDD considered the rare gene variants pathogenic for 61: 37 variants in telomere-related genes, 23 variants in surfactant-related genes and 1 variant in MARS. Genetic counseling was offered for relatives of these patients. The geneMDD therapeutic proposals were as follows: antifibrotic drugs (n = 25), steroids or immunomodulatory therapy (n = 18), organ transplantation (n = 21), watch and wait (n = 21), or best supportive care (n = 4)., Conclusion: Our experience shows that a dedicated geneMDD is feasible regardless of a patient's age and provides a unique opportunity to adapt patient management and therapy in this very rare condition.

Introduction: Chronic back pain (CBP) is a frequent complaint in patients with sarcoidosis, which challenges the clinician as multiples causes may potentially underlie this symptom. Interestingly, some reports suggest that the coexistence of sarcoidosis and spondyloarthritis (SpA) may be frequent. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of axial radiographic and non-radiographic SpA in patients with sarcoidosis and CBP and assess the association between patient characteristics and SpA., Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 64 patients with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis and CBP. Patients describing CBP underwent a full spine MRI and radiography. All patients with inflammatory CBP underwent complementary sacroiliac joint MRI. The diagnosis of axial SpA was based on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria., Results: Among the 64 patients (49 women) with sarcoidosis and CBP, 29 had inflammatory pain; 15/64 had a diagnosis of SpA (23.4% [95% CI: 13.7-35.6], 14/29 (48.3% [95% CI: 29.5-67.5] of those with inflammatory back pain). MRI sacroiliitis was found in 13 patients. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, SpA diagnosis was associated with inflammatory CBP (OR=28.5, 95% CI: 1.91-425.4) and sarcoidosis limited to the thorax (OR=6.74, 95% CI: 1.08-42.1). SpA was associated with young age (p = 0.0093) and male sex (p = 0.021) only on univariate analysis. Besides, 12/64 patients (18.8%, 95% CI: 10.1-30.5) had a diagnosis of sarcoidosis spine bone lesions, 7/64 (10.9%, 95% CI: 4.5-21.2) symptomatic vertebral fracture and 30/64 (46.9%, 95% CI: 34.3-59.8) degenerative spine., Conclusions: The prevalence of SpA is increased in sarcoidosis patients with inflammatory back pain. The systematic use of spine and sacroiliac MRI in this subgroup is justified. The association between other patient features and SpA needs further confirmation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: To describe the current knowledge on indications for sarcoidosis treatment., Recent Findings: Despite the lack of evidence-based recommendations, the sarcoidosis community has adopted the concept of starting systemic anti-inflammatory treatment because of potential danger (risk of severe dysfunction on major organs or death) or unacceptable impaired quality of life (QoL). On the contrary, while QoL and functionality are patients' priorities, few studies have evaluated treatment effect on patient-reported outcomes. The awareness of long-term corticosteroids toxicities and consequences on QoL and the emergence of novel drugs have changed therapeutic management. Second-line therapy, mainly methotrexate and azathioprine, are indicated for corticosteroids sparing or corticosteroids-resistant sarcoidosis. TNF-α inhibitors are a useful third-line therapy in chronic refractory disease. In addition to organ-targeted treatment, efforts should also be taken for treating nonorgan-specific symptoms, such as physical training for fatigue, and various disease complications., Summary: Clinicians should offer a tailored treatment for each patient and ensure a holistic multidisciplinary approach, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Patient-centered communication is critical to drive shared decisions, in particular for the tricky situation of isolated impaired QoL as the unique therapeutic indication. Once treatment is decided, clinicians should define a clear therapeutic plan, including goals and instruments to assess response.

Introduction: Acute muscle involvement is an infrequent complication of corticosteroids, characterized by muscle weakness and a rhabdomyolysis, rapidly regressive after withdrawal of corticosteroids., Case Report: We report the case of a woman admitted in intensive care unit for acute severe asthma, treated with high doses of methylprednisolone. Serum CPK level raised with a peak at 28,160 UI/L (n<250 UI/L) at day 15, suggesting acute rhabdomyolysis with renal failure. CPK rapidly normalized when corticosteroids were discontinued. Other causes of rhabdomyolysis were ruled out., Conclusion: This necrosing myopathy under high doses of corticosteroids has been described in patients with severe acute asthma. The mechanism of the muscle damage results from a combination of corticosteroids toxicity, respiratory acidosis and mechanic ventilation., (Copyright © 2018 Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Regulator of telomere length 1 ( RTEL1 ) mutations have been evidenced in 5-9% of familial pulmonary fibrosis; however, the phenotype of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and RTEL1 mutations is poorly understood.Whole exome sequencing was performed in 252 probands with ILD and we included all patients with ILD and RTEL1 mutation. RTEL1 expression was evaluated by immunochemistry in the lungs of controls, as well as in RTEL1 and telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT ) mutation carriers.We identified 35 subjects from 17 families. Median age at diagnosis of ILD was 53.1 years (range 28.0-80.6). The most frequent pulmonary diagnoses were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n=20, 57%), secondary ILD (n=7, 20%) and unclassifiable fibrosis or interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (n=7, 20%). The median transplant-free and overall survival periods were 39.2 months and 45.3 months, respectively. Forced vital capacity at diagnosis was the only factor associated with decreased transplant-free survival. Extra-pulmonary manifestations were less frequent as compared to other telomere-related gene mutation carriers. A systematic analysis of the literature identified 110 patients with ILD and RTEL1 mutations (including this series) and confirmed the heterogeneity of the pulmonary phenotype, the prevalence of non-idiopathic diseases and the low prevalence of extra-pulmonary manifestations.Immunohistochemistry showed that RTEL1 was expressed by bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells, as well as by alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes, but not by fibroblasts., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Savapharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D. Bouvry has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Cottin reports personal fees for consultancy, lecturing and travel to medical meetings from Actelion and Roche, personal fees for development of educational presentations, consultancy, lecturing and travel to medical meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for consultancy from Bayer and GSK, personal fees for adjudication committee work from Gilead, personal fees for consultancy and travel to medical meetings from MSD, personal fees for consultancy and lecturing from Novartis and Sanofi, institutional grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, personal fees for data and safety monitoring board work from Promedior and Celgene, personal fees for consultancy and data and safety monitoring board work from Galapagos, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Gauvain has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Cazes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray reports personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, and reimbursement for travel and accommodation for medical meeting for Guerbet and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Cadranel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Dieude has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Degot reports personal fees for expert testimony in ILD and travel reimbursement for the Congress CPLF 2018 in Lyon from Boerhinger Ingelheim France, and personal fees for expert testimony in ILD from Roche France, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Dominique reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.S. Gamez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Jaillet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P-A. Juge has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Londono-Vallejo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Mailleux has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Mal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Boileau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Menard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Prevot has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Quetant has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Revy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Traclet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Wemeau-Stervinou reports personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim and Roche, personal fees from Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Jansen-Cilag, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Wislez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani reports grants for research and personal fees for development of educational presentations, consultancy, lecturing and travel to medical meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants for research and personal fees for consultancy, lecturing and travel to medical meetings from Roche, personal fees for consultancy and lecturing from Sanofi and Apellis, personal fees for consultancy, lecturing and travel to medical meetings from AstraZeneca, and research grants from MedImmune, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

Aim: To compare combined 2-[ 18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography (PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for the diagnosis and therapy monitoring of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS)., Materials and Methods: Eighty patients with sarcoidosis and a suspicion of CS who underwent PET and CMR were included retrospectively. PET was undertaken after a low-carbohydrate-high-fat diet in all patients using a combined 16-section PET/computed tomography (CT) camera. PET was considered positive (PET+) in cases of focal or multifocal FDG uptake. CMR was considered positive (CMR+) in cases of subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). A subgroup of 50 patients (50/80) was monitored during therapy and classified as responders or non-responders., Results: Eighty-two percent of patients with PET+ (9/11) also had CMR+ imaging, with good spatial agreement (kappa=0,79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.94). Twenty-seven percent (22/80) had residual physiological FDG uptake, with a standardised uptake value (SUV) not significantly different compared to the SUV from pathological uptake (6.4 versus 6 respectively, p=0,92). The clinical response was more frequent in patients with baseline PET+ compared to baseline PET- (80% versus 45%, p=0.07). PET findings improved in all cases under treatment (7/7), whereas LGE improved in only 33% of patients (3/9)., Conclusion: Due to high risk of false-positive or undetermined findings, PET might be performed as a second-line study in cases of LGE, to assess inflammatory load. In addition, PET seems suitable to predict and assess response under therapy., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)