1. Feasibility and Improved Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Adenosine to Assess Microvascular Dysfunction With Bolus Thermodilution.
- Author
-
Mejia-Renteria H, Shabbir A, Nuñez-Gil IJ, Macaya F, Salinas P, Tirado-Conte G, Nombela-Franco L, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez-Ortiz A, and Escaned J
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Aged, Coronary Vessels physiopathology, Coronary Circulation physiology, Myocardial Ischemia physiopathology, Myocardial Ischemia diagnosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Thermodilution methods, Adenosine administration & dosage, Microcirculation physiology, Microcirculation drug effects, Feasibility Studies, Vasodilator Agents administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Bolus thermodilution and intravenous adenosine are established methods for coronary microcirculatory assessment. Yet, its adoption remains low, partly due to procedural time and patient discomfort associated with intravenous adenosine. We investigated differences between intracoronary and intravenous adenosine using bolus thermodilution in terms of microcirculatory indices, procedural time, and side effects associated with adenosine in patients with myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries., Methods and Results: In this prospective, observational study, 102 patients with suspected myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries underwent measurements of mean transit time, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, procedure time and patient tolerability with low-dose intracoronary adenosine, high-dose intracoronary adenosine (HDIC), and intravenous adenosine. HDIC induced greater hyperemia compared with low-dose intracoronary IC adenosine and intravenous adenosine with a shorter hyperemic mean transit time, P <0.0001. Coronary flow reserve was higher and index of microcirculatory resistance lowest with HDIC, compared with low-dose intracoronary IC adenosine and intravenous adenosine, P <0.05. Low coronary flow reserve was downgraded from 21% with intravenous adenosine to 10% with HDIC adenosine ( P =0.031); high index of microcirculatory resistance was downgraded from 23% with intravenous adenosine to 14% with HDIC ( P =0.098). Intracoronary adenosine was associated with lower procedural times ( P <0.0001). More patients experienced chest pain with intravenous adenosine ( P <0.01) and the chest pain intensity was higher compared with intracoronary adenosine ( P <0.0001)., Conclusions: In patients with suspected myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries undergoing coronary microcirculatory assessment with bolus thermodilution, the use of HDIC compared with intravenous adenosine was associated with enhanced induction of hyperemia. The use of intracoronary adenosine allowed for a shorter procedure time and was better tolerated., Registration+: URL: clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04827498.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF