Back to Search
Start Over
Prognostic Implications of Resistive Reserve Ratio in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease With Myocardial Bridging.
- Source :
-
Journal of the American Heart Association [J Am Heart Assoc] 2024 Aug 06; Vol. 13 (15), pp. e035000. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 31. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Myocardial bridging (MB) is accompanied by the dynamic extravascular compression of epicardial coronary arteries, leading to intracoronary hemodynamic disturbance with abnormal coronary flow profiles. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of resistive reserve ratio (RRR), a composite measure of flow and pressure parameters that represents the vasodilatory capacity of the coronary arteries, in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) and MB, in comparison with coronary flow reserve (CFR).<br />Methods and Results: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with ANOCA who underwent coronary reactivity testing, where MB was identified by transient constriction in coronary artery segments between systole and diastole. Abnormal CFR and RRR were defined as <2.5 and <2.62, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events, including cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and late revascularization, served as outcomes. Among 1251 patients with ANOCA, 191 (15.3%) had MB. The prevalence of abnormal CFR or RRR was not significantly different between patients with and without MB ( P =0.144 and P =0.398, respectively). Over a median follow-up time of 6.9 years, abnormal RRR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients with MB (hazard ratio [HR], 4.38 [95% CI, 1.71-11.21]; P =0.002) and without MB (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.38-2.64]; P <0.001). Abnormal CFR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients without MB (HR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.54-3.00]; P <0.001), whereas it was not predictive of major adverse cardiac events in patients with MB (HR, 2.29 [95% CI, 0.93-5.65]; P =0.073).<br />Conclusions: In patients with ANOCA and MB, impaired RRR was superior to impaired CFR in distinguishing patients at a higher risk of future adverse events, suggesting that RRR may serve as a risk stratification tool in patients with MB and ANOCA.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Male
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Aged
Vascular Resistance physiology
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial physiology
Coronary Circulation physiology
Coronary Vessels physiopathology
Coronary Vessels diagnostic imaging
Risk Factors
Predictive Value of Tests
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology
Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis
Myocardial Bridging physiopathology
Myocardial Bridging complications
Myocardial Bridging diagnosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2047-9980
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 15
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39082414
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.035000