Search

Background: Pain management after surgery is crucial to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Acute pain services (APS) are multidisciplinary teams that represent a modern strategy to address pain inside hospitals. The APS defines and applies pain treatment protocols specific for each surgery. To evaluate the performance of the APS at our institute, we performed a large retrospective cohort study focusing on complications of epidural analgesia and IV opiates., Methods: Data from the 10 years of activity of the APS were collected. Pain was assessed using the VAS at rest (VASr) and during movement (VASm) at each daily visit; the presence of side effects and complications was also assessed., Results: A total of 17,913 adult patients were followed by APS during the study period. Epidural analgesia was used in 7,776 cases (43%), while 9,239 (52%) patients used IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). A combination of the 2 was used in 87 patients (0.5%). A total of 456 perineural catheters (2.6%) were placed, while 442 patients(2.5%) used other analgesic techniques. We recorded 163 dural punctures during catheter placement, with no epidural hematoma, epidural abscess, or meningitis, and no permanent modification in sensitive or motor functions., Conclusions: In our large case series, APS was confirmed safe and effective in treating postoperative pain, using both epidural analgesia and IV PCA with morphine., (© 2019 World Institute of Pain.)

Objective: To evaluate the changes in hemodynamic variables and intraocular pressure (IOP) after tracheal intubation using either lightwand or direct-vision laryngoscopy techniques., Design: Prospective, randomized study., Setting: Inpatient anesthesia at a University Anesthesia Department., Patients: 50 normotensive, ASA physical status I and II patients, without ocular or cardiovascular diseases, and with a Mallampati score no greater than 2., Interventions: After intravenous (i.v.) midazolam premedication (0.05 mg.kg-1), general anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1 microgram.g-1) and thiopental sodium (5 mg.g-1) followed by vecuronium bromide (0.1 mg.g-1), then patients were randomly allocated to receive either the lightwand (Trachlight, n = 25) or direct-vision laryngoscopy (Laryngoscopy, n = 25) intubating techniques. General anesthesia was maintained with 1% isoflurane and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen mixture for 5 minutes., Measurements and Main Results: Baseline hemodynamic variables were recorded 10 minutes after i.v. premedication, and then every minute after tracheal intubation. Intraocular pressure measurements were performed by means of a computerized indentation tonometer after general anesthesia induction and then 1 and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. In both groups, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate increased from baseline, without differences between the two groups. One minute after intubation, IOP increased in both groups: the mean percentage increase was 32% in the Laryngoscopy group and 16% in the Trachlight group. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Five minutes after intubation, IOP decreased to baseline values in both groups., Conclusion: We conclude that in healthy patients without ocular disease, using a lightwand intubating technique does not reduce the hemodynamic responses and increase in IOP associated with tracheal intubation as compared with conventional direct-vision laryngoscopy.

Purpose: To determine the plasma concentrations of propofol required to achieve different levels of sedation during monitored anesthesia care., Methods: Sixty ASA I-II, 18-65 yr-old patients, received a target-controlled continuous iv infusion of propofol. The target plasma concentration of propofol (Cpt) was initially set at 0.4 microg x ml(-1). Two minutes after calculated equilibrium between plasma and effect-site concentrations, the Cpt of propofol was increased by 0.2 microg x ml(-1) steps until the patient showed no reaction to squeezing the trapezius. The level of sedation was assessed immediately before each increase in propofol Cpt using the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale., Results: The Cpt of propofol required to induce lethargic response to name was 1.3 microg x ml(-1) (5 degrees and 95 degrees percentiles: 1.0 - 1.8 microg x ml(-1)), to obtain response after loud and repeated calling name was 1.7 microg x ml(-1) (1.2 - 2.2 microg x ml(-1)), to obtain response after prodding or shaking was 2.0 microg x ml(-1) (1.6 - 2.6 microg x ml(-1)), to obtain response after squeezing the trapezius was 2.4 microg x ml(-1) (1.8 - 3.0 microg x ml(-1)). Patients showed no response after squeezing the trapezius at 2.8 microg x ml(-1) (2.0 - 3.6 microg x ml(-1)). Correlation between Cpt propofol and sedation scores were r = 0.76, P < 0.0001., Conclusions: Target-controlled infusion of propofol provided easy and safe management of intraoperative sedation, allowing fast and predictable deepening in the level of sedation, while minimizing systemic side effects of intravenous sedation due to the minimal risk of overdosing the drug.