1. Comparison between SOFI and STORM
- Author
-
Stefan Geissbuehler, Theo Lasser, and Claudio Dellagiacoma
- Subjects
Computer science ,02 engineering and technology ,Superresolution ,computer.software_genre ,03 medical and health sciences ,Visibility ,Image resolution ,030304 developmental biology ,Fluorescence microscopy ,0303 health sciences ,Microscopy ,Super-resolution microscopy ,business.industry ,Resolution (electron density) ,ocis:(100.6640) Super-resolution ,Pattern recognition ,Storm ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics ,Ptychography ,Image sequence ,ocis:(180.2520) Fluorescence microscopy ,Imaging technique ,Data mining ,Artificial intelligence ,0210 nano-technology ,business ,computer ,Biotechnology - Abstract
A straightforward method to achieve super-resolution consists of taking an image sequence of stochastically blinking emitters using a standard wide-field fluorescence microscope. Densely packed single molecules can be distinguished sequentially in time using high-precision localization algorithms (e.g., PALM and STORM) or by analyzing the statistics of the temporal fluctuations (SOFI). In a face-to-face comparison of the two post-processing algorithms, we show that localization-based super-resolution can deliver higher resolution enhancements but imposes significant constraints on the blinking behavior of the probes, which limits its applicability for live-cell imaging. SOFI, on the other hand, works more consistently over different photo-switching kinetics and also delivers information about the specific blinking statistics. Its suitability for low SNR acquisition reveals SOFI's potential as a high-speed super-resolution imaging technique.
- Published
- 2011