Search

Background: The AutoPap 300 QC system (Tripath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, NC) is an automated device that was designed to screen conventionally prepared cervical smears and, more recently, thin-layer slide preparations. The system has been tested in large clinical trials., Methods: A total of 14,145 cervical smears obtained from participants in the Florence screening program were eligible for the study. Smears were processed first with the AutoPap system and were classified into three different categories: 1) no further review (NFR), 2) review, and 3) process review (PR). Conventional manual reading was performed by 10 experienced cytopathologists., Results: After AutoPap processing, 2398 smears were classified as NFR (16.9%), and 1818 smears were classified as PR (12.8%). Overall, there were 188 inadequate smears (1.3%) at conventional review and 125 inadequate smears (0.88%) at AutoPap review. Six-month repeat smears were prompted by 330 conventional reviews (2.3%) and by 222 AutoPap reviews (1.56%). Similarly, referral to colposcopy was prompted by 179 conventional reviews (1.2%) and by 147 AutoPap reviews (1.0%). Overall, 32 patients were diagnosed with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a result of assessment. Conventional reading detected 31 patients (28 patients were referred for colposcopy, and 3 patients were referred for repeat cytology), and the AutoPap system detected 30 patients (27 patients were referred for colposcopy, and 3 patients were referred for repeat cytology)., Conclusions: The current experience suggested that conventional reading and AutoPap reading of cervical smears had essentially the same sensitivity, with slightly greater specificity for the AutoPap system. Thus, comparisons of the AutoPap system and conventional reading should focus mainly on cost analysis., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The results of blind reading of smears obtained with liquid-based cytology in patients previously screened by conventional cytology were compared., Material and Methods: Cases selected for the study were a consecutive series of 99 subjects undergoing colposcopy within the screening program of the Florence District. The Pap test samples were processed utilizing the Thin Prep 2000 (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA). The liquid-base cytology smears were randomly admixed and read by seven expert cytologists with more than 15 years of experience in Pap smear reading. For each case, a consensus diagnosis was created and considered as the definitive diagnosis. Cytologic reports in conventional and liquid-based cytology smears were compared by the kappa statistic to evaluate diagnostic agreement., Results: The study showed that the conventional and liquid-based cytology provide comparable cytologic reports and that the latter is not less sensitive than the former in detecting CIN2+ lesions of the cervix., Discussion: Such evidence suggests the feasibility of randomized studies comparing the two methods, which are needed before adopting liquid-based cytology as the current method when screening for cervical cancer.

Aims and Background: False-negative cytological diagnoses represent the critical point of a screening program for early detection of cervical cancer. Computer-assisted reading using neural network technology has been suggested as a possible approach to manage the problem. The study assessed the performance and the cost-outcome ratio of computer-assisted versus conventional manual Pap smear reading., Methods: One thousand routine smears, seeded with 81 false-negative smears, were independently interpreted by two readers by conventional and PAPNET-assisted reading. Results of both readings were compared in terms of: a)sensitivity for false-negative smears, b)specificity, and c) cost-outcome (cost per CIN2+ lesion detected)., Results: PAPNET-assisted reading showed a small increase in sensitivity only for one reader. Including the cost of PAPNET, the cost per detected lesion would be $7,543 and the cost per additional detected lesion would be $25,748., Conclusions: The present study provides further evidence that PAPNET-assisted screening may allow the detection of a few extra cases of CIN2+ lesions with respect to conventional reading, though at a very high cost.

Cytologic examination of urethral smears prepared with the Cytobrush and colposcopic examination of the penis were performed in 53 male partners of women with cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and in 14 healthy controls. A diagnosis of HPV infection was recorded in 28 subjects (52.8%). Cytology was positive in 26 cases (49%) and colposcopy was positive in 5 cases, with both tests positive in 3 cases. No controls were positive by cytology or colposcopy. These findings suggest that urethral cytology and colposcopic examination should be routinely performed in partners of women with HPV infections to detect inapparent infections. The Cytobrush should be employed for the urethral cytologic sampling; smears prepared by other techniques (urine collection or urethral swabbing) yield lower detection rates.