Search

Compared to [Ni(II)(SePh)(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-SH))]- (1a) and [Ni(II)(Cl)(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-SH))]- (3a) with a combination of the intramolecular [Ni...H-S] and [Ni-S...H-S] interactions, complexes [NiII(SePh)(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-SH))]- (1b) and [Ni(II)(Cl)(P (o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-SH))]- (3b) with intramolecular [Ni...H-S] interaction exhibit lower nu(S-H) stretching frequencies (2137 and 2235 cm(-1) for 1b and 3b vs 2250 and 2287 cm(-1) for 1a and 3a, respectively) and smaller torsion angles (27.2 degrees for 3b vs 58.9 and 59.1 degrees for 1a and 3a, respectively). The pendant thiol interaction modes of 1a, 3a, and 3b in the solid state are controlled by the solvent pairs of crystallization. Oxygen oxidation of dinuclear [Ni(II)(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-SH))](2) (4) yielded thermally stable dinuclear [Ni(III)(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-mu-S))](2) (5). The two paramagnetic d(7) Ni(III) cores (S = 1/2) with antiferromagnetic coupling (J = -3.13 cm(-1)) rationalize the diamagnetic property of 5. The fully delocalized mixed-valence [Ni(II)-Ni(III)] complexes [Ni2(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(3))(2)]- (6) and [Ni(2)(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(3))(P(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-S)(2)(o-C(6)H(3)-3-SiMe(3)-2-SCH(3)))] (7) were isolated upon the reduction of 5 and the methylation of 6, respectively. The electronic perturbation from the sulfur methylation of 6 triggers the stronger Ni...Ni interaction and the geometrical rearrangement from the diamond shape of the [NiS(2)Ni] core to the butterfly structure of [Ni(mu-S)(2)Ni] to yield 7 with Ni...Ni distances of 2.6088(1) A. The distinctly different Ni...Ni distances (2.6026(7) for 5 and 2.8289(15) A for 6) and the coordination number of the nickels indicate a balance of geometrical requirements for different oxidation levels of [PS(3)Ni-NiPS(3)] cores of 5 and 6.

The stable mononuclear Ni(III)-thiolate complexes [NiIII(L)(P(C6H3-3-SiMe3-2-S)3)]- (L = SePh (2), Cl (3), SEt (4), 2-S-C4H3S (5), CH2CN (7)) were isolated and characterized by UV-vis, EPR, IR, SQUID, CV, 1H NMR, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The increased basicity (electronic density) of the nickel center of complexes [NiIII(L)(P(C6H3-3-SiMe3-2-S)3)]- modulated by the monodentate ligand L and the substituted groups of the phenylthiolate rings promotes the stability and reactivity. In contrast to the irreversible reduction at -1.17 V (vs Cp2Fe/Cp2Fe+) for complex 3, the cyclic voltammograms of complexes [NiIII(SePh)(P(o-C6H4S)3)]-, 2, 4, and 7 display reversible NiIII/II redox processes with E(1/2) = -1.20, -1.26, -1.32, and -1.34 V (vs Cp2Fe/Cp2Fe+), respectively. Compared to complex 2 containing a phenylselenolate-coordinated ligand, complex 4 with a stronger electron-donating ethylthiolate coordinated to the Ni(III) promotes dechlorination of CH2Cl2 to yield complex 3 (kobs = (6.01 +/- 0.03) x 10-4 s-1 for conversion of complex 4 into 3 vs kobs = (4.78 +/- 0.02) x 10-5 s-1 for conversion of complex 2 into 3). Interestingly, addition of CH3CN into complex 3 in the presence of sodium hydride yielded the stable Ni(III)-cyanomethanide complex 7 with a NiIII-CH2CN bond distance of 2.037(3) A. The NiIII-SEt bond length of 2.273(1) A in complex 4 is at the upper end of the 2.12-2.28 A range for the NiIII-S bond lengths of the oxidized-form [NiFe] hydrogenases. In contrast to the inertness of complexes 3 and 7 under CO atmosphere, carbon monoxide triggers the reductive elimination of the monodentate chalcogenolate ligand of complexes 2, 4, and 5 to produce the trigonal bipyramidal complex [NiII(CO)(P(C6H3-3-SiMe3-2-S)3]- (6).

Owing to the indiscriminate reactivity of the free NO radical, intricate control mechanisms are required for storage, transport and transfer of NO to its various biological targets. Among the proposed storage components are protein-bound thionitrosyls (Rprotein-SNO) and protein-bound dinitrosyl iron complexes. Current knowledge suggests the latter are derived from iron-sulfur cluster degradation in the presence of excess NO. Mobilization of protein-bound NO could involve NO or Fe(NO)2 unit transfer to small serum molecules such as glutathione, free cysteine, or iron-porphyrins. The study reported is of a reaction model which addresses the key steps in NO transfer from a prototypal iron dinitrosyl complex. While the N,N'-bis(2-mercaptoethyl)-N,N'-diazacyclooctane (bme-daco) ligand typically binds in square-planar N2S2 coordination, it also serves as a bidentate dithiolate donor for tetrahedral structures in the preparation of the (H+bme-daco)Fe(NO)2 derivative (Chiang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:10867-10874, 2004). The removal of one NO produces the mononitrosyl complex, (bme-daco)Fe(NO), and simplifies studies of NO release mechanisms. We have used heme-type model complexes, Fe or Co porphyrins as NO acceptors, yielding (porphyrin)M(NO), where M is Fe or Co, and monitored reactions by nu(NO) Fourier transform IR spectroscopy. Reaction products were verified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rudimentary mechanistic studies suggest a role for HNO in the NO release from the dinitrosyl; the mononitrosyl benefits as well from acid catalysis. Other NO uptake complexes such as [(N2S2)Fe]2 [N2S2 is bme-daco or N,N'-bis(2-mercapto-2-methylpropyl)-daco] are shown to form Fe(NO) mononitrosyls with stability and spectroscopic signatures similar to those of the porphyrins.

The N-protonated bismercaptoethanediazacyclooctane serves as a bidentate dithiolate ligand to oxidized Fe(NO)(2) of Enemark-Feltam notation, E-F [Fe(NO)(2)],(9) mimicking Cys-X-Cys binding of Fe(NO)(2) to proteins or thio-biomolecules. The neutral compound is characterized by the well-known g = 2.03 EPR signal which is a hallmark of dinitrosyl iron complexes, DNIC's. The Fe(NO)(2) unit can be removed from the chelate by excess PhS(-), producing (PhS)(2)Fe(NO)(2)(-). Transfer of NO from Fe(H(+)bme-daco)(NO)(2) (nu(NO) = 1740, 1696 cm(-)(1)) to Fe(II) of [(bme-daco)Fe](2) yields the five-coordinate, square-pyramidal N(2)S(2)Fe(NO) (nu(NO) = 1649 cm(-)(1)), where NO is in the apical position. Its isotropic EPR signal at g = 2.05 is consistent with E-F [Fe(NO)](7) formulation. In excess NO, Roussin's red ester-type molecules are formed as dinuclear or tetranuclear species, [(micro-SRS)[Fe(2)(NO)(4)]](n)() (n =1, 2). These well-characterized molecules furnish reference points for positions and patterns in nu(NO) vibrational spectroscopy expected to be useful for in vivo studies of NO degradation of iron-sulfur clusters in ferredoxins.

Reaction of [PPN][Fe(NO)2(SePh)2] (1) with dimeric [Ni(mu-SCH2CH2SCH2CH2S)]2 in the presence of additional NO2- produced the neutral heterobimetallic [(ON)Ni[(mu-SCH2CH2)2S]Fe(NO)2] complex (2). The X-ray crystal structures of 1 and 2 show distorted tetrahedral iron dinitrosyl groups, assigned according to the Feltham-Enemark notation as [Fe(NO)2]9 The Fe-NO bonds are off linearity by an average of approximately equals 10 degrees for compounds 1 and 2, while a more linear Ni-NO coordination with a Ni-NO distance of 1.644(2) A was found in 2. The v(NO) value of complex 2 is consistent with an assignment for [Ni(NO)]9 of Ni0(NO)+ as is known for analogous phosphine derivatives, P3Ni0(NO)+. EPR signals of g values = 2.02-2.03 confirmed the existence of the odd electron in the chalcogenated [Fe(NO)2]9 compounds. Two [Fe(NO)2]10 complexes coordinated by the nickel(II) dithiolate, (bismercaptoethanediazacyclooctane)nickel(II), (Ni-1), (Ni-1)Fe(CO)(NO)2 and (Ni-1)Fe(NO)2, were prepared for comparison to the Ni0(NO)+ derivative and other monomeric and homodimetallic derivatives of the Fe(NO)2 fragment. While the oxidation level of Fe(NO)2 is the primary determinant of v(NO) values, they are also highly sensitive to ancillary ligands and, thereby, the distal metal influence through the bridging thiolate donor.

A series of tetragonally distorted square pyramids of formula N2S2M(NO) (M = Fe, Co) is prepared and characterized by nu(NO) IR and EPR spectroscopies, magnetism and electrochemical properties, as well as solid-state crystal structure determinations. While the nu(NO) IR frequencies and the angleM-N-O angles indicate differences in the electronic environment of NO consistent with the Enemark-Feltham notation of [Fe(NO)]7 and [Co(NO)]8, the reduction potentials, assigned to [Fe(NO)]7 + e- [Fe(NO)]8 and [Co(NO)]8 + e- [Co(NO)]9 respectively, are very similar, and in cases identical, for most members of the series. Coupled with the potential for the M(NO) units to breathe out of and into the N2S2 core plane are unique S-M-N-O torsional arrangements and concomitant pi-bonding interactions which may account for the unusual coherence of reduction potentials within the series.

The established ability of the Fe(II) bridging hydride species (micro-H)(micro-pdt)[Fe(CO)2(PMe3)]2+, 1-H+, to take-up and heterolytically activate dihydrogen, resulting in H/D scrambling of H2/D2 and H2/D2O mixtures (Zhao et al. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3917) has prompted a study of simultaneous alkene/H2 activation by such [Fe]H2ase model complexes. That the required photolysis produced an open site was substantiated by substitution of CO in 1-H+ by CH3CN with formation of structurally characterized [(micro-H)(micro-pdt)[Fe(CO)2(PMe3)][Fe(CO)(CH3CN)(PMe3)]]+[PF6]-. Under similar photolytic conditions, H/D exchange reactions between D2 and terminal alkenes (ethylene, propene and 1-butene), but not bulkier alkenes such as 2-butene or cyclohexene, were catalyzed by 1-H+ and the edt (SCH2CH2S) analogue, 2-H+. Substantial regioselectivity for H/D exchange at the internal vinylic hydrogen was observed. The extent to which the olefins were deuterium enriched vs deuterated was catalyst dependent. The stabilizing effect of the binuclear chelating ligands, SCH2CH2CH2S, pdt, and SCH2CH2S, edt, is required for the activity of binuclear catalysts, as the mono-dentate micro-SEt analogue decomposed to inactive products under the photolytic conditions of the catalysis. Reactions of 1 and 2 with EtOSO2CF3 yielded the S-alkylated products, [(micro-SCH2CH2CH2SEt)[Fe(CO)2(PMe3)]2]+[SO3CF3]- (1-Et+), and 2-Et+, rather than micro-C2H5 analogues to the micro-H of 1-H+. The stability and lack of reactivity toward H2 of 1-Et+ and 2-Et+, indicates they are not on the reaction path of the olefin/D2 H/D exchange process. A mechanism with olefin binding to an open site created by CO loss and formation of an Fe-(CH2CHDR) intermediate is indicated. A likely role of a binuclear chelate effect is implicated for the unique S-XXX-S cofactor in the active site of [Fe]H2ase.

Protonation of the [Fe]-hydrogenase model complex (mu-pdt)[Fe(CO)(2)(PMe(3))](2) (pdt = SCH(2)CH(2)CH(2)S) produces a species with a high field (1)H NMR resonance, isolated as the stable [(mu-H)(mu-pdt)[Fe(CO)(2)(PMe(3))](2)](+)[PF(6)](-) salt. Structural characterization found little difference in the 2Fe2S butterfly cores, with Fe.Fe distances of 2.555(2) and 2.578(1) A for the Fe-Fe bonded neutral species and the bridging hydride species, respectively (Zhao, X.; Georgakaki, I. P.; Miller, M. L.; Yarbrough, J. C.; Darensbourg, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9710). Both are similar to the average Fe.Fe distance found in structures of three Fe-only hydrogenase active site 2Fe2S clusters: 2.6 A. A series of similar complexes (mu-edt)-, (mu-o-xyldt)-, and (mu-SEt)(2)[Fe(CO)(2)(PMe(3))](2) (edt = SCH(2)CH(2)S; o-xyldt = SCH(2)C(6)H(4)CH(2)S), (mu-pdt)[Fe(CO)(2)(PMe(2)Ph)](2), and their protonated derivatives likewise show uniformity in the Fe-Fe bond lengths of the neutral complexes and Fe.Fe distances in the cationic bridging hydrides. The positions of the PMe(3) and PMe(2)Ph ligands are dictated by the orientation of the S-C bonds in the (mu-SRS) or (mu-SR)(2) bridges and the subsequent steric hindrance of R. The Fe(II)(mu-H)Fe(II) complexes were compared for their ability to facilitate H/D exchange reactions, as have been used as assays of H(2)ase activity. In a reaction that is promoted by light but inhibited by CO, the [(mu-H)(mu-pdt)[Fe(CO)(2)(PMe(3))](2)](+) complex shows H/D exchange activity with D(2), producing [(mu-D)(mu-pdt)[Fe(CO)(2)(PMe(3))](2)](+) in CH(2)Cl(2) and in acetone, but not in CH(3)CN. In the presence of light, H/D scrambling between D(2)O and H(2) is also promoted by the Fe(II)(mu-H)Fe(II) catalyst. The requirement of an open site suggests that the key step in the reactions involves D(2) or H(2) binding to Fe(II) followed by deprotonation by the internal hydride base, or by external water. As indicated by similar catalytic efficiencies of members of the series, the nature of the bridging thiolates has little influence on the reactions. Comparison to [Fe]H(2)ase enzyme active site redox levels suggests that at least one Fe(II) must be available for H(2) uptake while a reduced or an electron-rich Fe(I)Fe(I) metal-metal bonded redox level is required for proton uptake.