Search

Patients with cholestatic liver disease, including progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) and Alagille syndrome, may have debilitating pruritus, and reducing pruritus is a key therapeutic goal. However, few instruments are available that adequately measure pruritus in pediatric patients with cholestatic liver disease. The objectives of the current study were to establish the measurement properties of the novel PRUCISION patient-reported outcome (PRO) and observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) instruments and to estimate a threshold for clinically meaningful change in pruritus score.The PRO/ObsRO instruments are completed twice daily via electronic diary and include 5-point pictorial responses to assess pruritus. Sleep disturbance and tiredness were quantified using 5-point pictorial responses, yes/no responses, and numerical ratings. Data from PEDFIC 1 (NCT03566238), a phase 3 study evaluating odevixibat efficacy and safety in children with PFIC, were used to assess the psychometric properties of these instruments. Quantitative assessments included evaluation of test-retest reliability, determination of construct validity via convergent and known-group validity analyses, and characterization of sensitivity to change. A threshold for within-patient meaningful change from baseline to week 24 was determined using blinded data from PEDFIC 1 and distribution- and anchor-based analyses.Because the majority of patients in PEDFIC 1 were aged 8 years (n = 52/62) and thus too young to complete the PRO instrument, which was intended for patients aged ≥ 8 years, the small sample size of patients who completed the PRO precluded a full psychometric analysis of the PRO instrument. The ObsRO was completed by a caregiver of every patient in PEDFIC 1. The ObsRO instrument had acceptable test-retest reliability based on intraclass correlation values (most 0.75). Convergent validity analyses revealed moderate-to-strong correlations (r ≥ 0.3) between baseline ObsRO pruritus scores and baseline Global Impression of Symptoms (GIS) items. In known-groups validity analyses, there were significant differences between baseline groups defined by the GIS for ObsRO pruritus scores and for some sleep disturbance scores. Week 24 ObsRO scores were in the expected direction in groups defined by the Global Impression of Change scale (i.e., improved or not improved); many mean differences between these groups were significant. Sensitivity to change for the ObsRO PRUCISION instrument was also demonstrated by moderate-to-strong Pearson correlations between change from baseline to weeks 21-24 in ObsRO scores and GIS items (r ≥ 0.3). Based on these analyses, a within-patient change of -1.00 from baseline in ObsRO pruritus score was determined to be clinically meaningful.The PRUCISION ObsRO instrument is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change, supporting its use as a tool to measure pruritus and sleep disturbance in patients with PFIC and other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases.Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a collection of liver diseases that typically affects very young children. A problematic symptom of PFIC is extremely itchy skin, or pruritus, that can keep patients and their families up at night. The PRUCISION questionnaire was developed to measure the severity of a patient’s pruritus and sleep disturbance from the perspective of the patient’s caregiver. The current study had two primary goals: (1) to assess whether PRUCISION could reliably measure these symptoms and detect changes over time relative to other established rating scales that assess related concepts, and (2) to identify what score change on PRUCISION could be considered clinically meaningful. To do this, data from a clinical study, called PEDFIC 1, in patients with PFIC were used: patient’s scores on PRUCISION from their caregiver’s perspective were compared with scores on other established scales, first before any treatment was given in PEDFIC 1, and then again after 24 weeks of treatment with a drug called odevixibat. In general, there was good agreement between PRUCISION scores and scores on other scales. For example, when PRUCISION scores indicated that symptoms improved, this tended to correlate with improvement on other measures. Additionally, these analyses indicated that if the PRUCISION score drops by 1 point or more, that can be considered a clinically important change. Overall, this study found that the caregiver-reported PRUCISION questionnaire is valid for assessing changes in pruritus and sleep symptoms in patients with PFIC, which may benefit patients as new treatments are developed.

Background The systematic collection of disease-specific symptoms and impacts on the lives of patients with Fabry Disease (FD) can offer unique insights into the patient experience, yet no disease-specific tool to measure FD symptoms exists. This study describes the development of the Fabry Disease Patient-Reported Outcome (FD-PRO). Methods A targeted literature search, interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs), and concept elicitation (CE) interviews with patients identified the most frequent signs and symptoms associated with FD and their impact on daily life. Cognitive interviews evaluated patients’ ability to understand the FD-PRO instructions and respond to the items on the draft FD-PRO instrument. Results The targeted literature search identified key signs and symptoms in domains that were confirmed in KOL interviews. In CE interviews with 37 treated and treatment-naïve patients, neuropathic pain symptoms (95% treated, 82% treatment-naïve), temperature intolerance (95% treated, 88% treatment-naïve), energy difficulties (95% treated, 94% treatment-naïve), hearing/vision impairment (95% treated, 71% treatment-naïve), and gastrointestinal symptoms (80% treated, 59% treatment-naïve) were most frequently mentioned. Results were similar for men and women in both treated and treatment-naïve groups. While treatment-naïve patients in general expressed fewer and milder symptoms compared to treated patients, the overall sets of symptoms expressed by the two groups were similar. The most severe symptoms were neuropathic pain, stomach pain, burning pain, and fatigue. The most bothersome symptoms were stomach pain, breathing difficulty, fatigue, neuropathic pain, and constipation. The most frequent impacts were in the work/school limitations domain for both treated and treatment-naïve patients. The impacts with the highest difficulty ratings were stress, limited outdoor activity, and guilt. Cognitive interviews with 14 treated and treatment-naïve patients resulted in the refinement of FD-PRO items and language. Conclusions The FD-PRO is a novel, disease-specific instrument that measures the patient experience in Fabry disease. Such tools are valuable in capturing the burden of disease in patients with FD and demonstrating the value of treatment in clinical trials.

Patients experience a wide range of signs, symptoms, and impacts related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A patient-reported outcome (PRO) item bank that measures the most relevant patient experiences is needed to fully evaluate treatment benefit in COVID-19 clinical trials.A review of the literature and social media informed a novel PRO item bank of COVID-19 signs, symptoms, and impacts and general pandemic impacts. Twenty 1:1 concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with adults in the US who had symptomatic COVID-19. A conceptual model was developed and the PRO item bank refined following interviews.A heterogenous set of signs, symptoms, and impacts of COVID-19, as well as impacts associated with the pandemic overall, was identified. Fifty-five short-term and long-term signs and symptom items, 26 items assessing disease-related impacts, and seven items evaluating pandemic-related impacts are included in the item bank.The novel and preliminarily content-valid IQVIA COVID-19 Daily Diary Item Bank

Understanding how patients experience their disease is a vital step in optimal disease management, and patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO and ObsRO, respectively) measures can add important details to clinical information that is obtained as novel treatments are developed. Instruments that measure meaningful symptoms and impacts from the perspective of pediatric patients with cholestatic liver disease or their caregivers are needed. This study aimed to identify salient concepts in pediatric cholestatic liver disease, develop novel PRO and ObsRO instruments, and establish the instruments' content validity.Relevant signs, symptoms, and impacts of cholestatic liver disease were identified through a literature review, interviews with expert clinicians, and concept elicitation interviews with children and caregivers of children who had progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), Alagille syndrome, biliary atresia, or primary sclerosing cholangitis. Additional cognitive debriefing interviews with patients and caregivers were performed to ensure that participants could understand the instructions, questions, and response scales of the PRO and ObsRO instruments, with modifications made as necessary to improve comprehension and/or usability.A total of 36 interviews with patients and caregivers were conducted. Pruritus and sleep disturbance (e.g., difficulty falling or staying asleep due to itch) were identified as the most problematic symptom and significant impact, respectively, of the pediatric cholestatic liver diseases assessed. The ObsRO and PRO instruments, called PRUCISION, focus on these key disease features in the morning and evening. Several modifications were made to the draft instruments following cognitive interviews. The final PRUCISION PRO and ObsRO measures are designed as an electronic diary to be completed twice daily. The response scales include pictorial, verbal, and numeric scales.Novel PRO and ObsRO PRUCISION instruments were created that evaluate the patient experience of cholestatic pruritus in children with PFIC and other cholestatic liver diseases. The content validity of the PRUCISION instruments is established.Bile, a greenish liquid that is made in the liver, is released into the gut to help digest food. In cholestatic liver disease (CLD), bile flow is interrupted, and bile can build up in the body. One potential effect of this buildup is pruritus, or itchiness of the skin, which can be so intense that it interferes with daily activities. In this study, interviews were done with doctors, patients, and their caregivers to develop new tools to evaluate the most impactful symptoms of CLD in children. After interviewing five doctors and 36 patients and caregivers, two questionnaires called PRUCISION were developed and refined. During this process, participants were first asked about the frequency, severity, duration, and impact of their or their child’s symptoms; pruritus was identified as the most common and disruptive symptom associated with CLD, even interfering with sleep. Then, the wording of the questionnaires was modified to make them easier to understand, particularly for younger children. The researchers also had patients do a card-sorting task to ensure that they understood the picture-based responses used in the questionnaires. Finally, more details were added to the instructions for caregivers to more clearly define scratching behaviors. In summary, the questionnaires developed in this study include the perspective of the patient or their caregiver and may be useful to see if new treatments can impact the most prominent symptoms and impacts associated with CLD.

Background Heart failure is a worldwide health problem that significantly affects patients’ physical function and health state. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure commonly used for the assessment of health states of patients with heart failure. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the KCCQ. Methods Using pooled data of 141 Japanese patients with chronic heart failure from three clinical trials, the Japanese version of the KCCQ was evaluated for validity and reliability, with a focus on the clinical summary score (CSS) and its component domains. For construct validity, the associations of baseline KCCQ scores with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and the EuroQol five-dimension, three-level (EQ-5D-3L) scores at baseline were analyzed. For reliability, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α, and test–retest reliability (reproducibility) was assessed among stable patients. Responsiveness to changes in patients’ clinical status was assessed by analyzing score changes between two timepoints among patients whose health states improved. Results Among 141 patients (mean age, 73.7 ± 10.9 years), 76.6% were NYHA class II at baseline. For CSS and its component domains (physical limitations, symptom frequency, and symptom severity), baseline scores were all significantly lower in patients with a higher NYHA class (p ρ = − 0.40 to − 0.54) with three functional status-related EQ-5D dimensions (mobility, self-care, and usual activities). The Cronbach’s standardized α was high (> 0.70) for all KCCQ domain/summary scores. In the test–retest analysis among 58 stable patients, all domain/summary scores minimally changed by 0.3–4.2 points with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.65–0.84, demonstrating moderate to good reproducibility, except for the symptom stability domain. Among 44 patients with improved health states, all domain/summary scores except for the symptom stability and self-efficacy domains substantially improved from baseline with a medium to large effect size of 0.62–0.88. Conclusions The Japanese version of the KCCQ was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of symptoms and physical function of Japanese patients with chronic heart failure.

Aims: Heart failure (HF) affects approximately 26 million people worldwide. With an aging global population, innovative approaches to HF evaluation and management are needed to cope with the worsening HF epidemic. The aim of the Real-Life Multimarker Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure (REALIsM-HF) study (NCT03507439) is to evaluate a composite instrument comprising remote, real-time, activity-monitoring devices combined with daily electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) items in patients who have been hospitalized for HF and are undergoing standard HF assessment (e.g., 6-min walking distance [6MWD], blood biomarkers, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], and echocardiography). Methods: REALIsM-HF is an ongoing, 12-week, observational study enrolling 80–100 patients aged ≥45 years with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥45%) or reduced EF (HFrEF; EF ≤35%). Statistical analyses will include examining the association between data from wearables (the AVIVO© mobile patient management patch or VitalPatch© biosensor, and the DynaPort MoveMonitor©), daily ePROs, and conventional HF metrics (e.g., serum/plasma biomarkers, 6MWD, KCCQ, and echocardiographic parameters). The feasibility of and patient compliance with at-home devices will be documented, and the data captured for the purpose of establishing reference values in patients with HFpEF or HFrEF will be summarized. Conclusions: The REALIsM-HF study is to evaluate the longitudinal daily activity profiles of patients with HF and correlate these with changes in serum/plasma biomarker profiles, symptoms, quality of life, and cardiac function and morphology to inform the use of wearable activity monitors for developing novel therapies and managing patients.

This study developed and explored a novel composite endpoint to assess the overall impact that treatment can have on patients living with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Candidate composite endpoint variables were selected by a group of experts and included: lactate dehydrogenase levels as a measure of intravascular hemolysis; complete terminal complement inhibition; absence of major adverse vascular events, including thrombosis; absence of any adverse events leading to death or discontinuation of study treatment; transfusion avoidance; and improvements in fatigue-related quality of life as determined by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue score. From these variables, a novel composite endpoint was constructed and explored using data collected in the ravulizumab PNH Study 301 (NCT02946463). Thresholds were defined and reported for each candidate variable. Five of the six candidate variables were included in the final composite endpoint; the FACIT-Fatigue score was excluded. Composite endpoint criterion was defined as patients meeting all five selected individual component thresholds. All patients in the ravulizumab arm achieved complete terminal complement inhibition and a reduction in lactate dehydrogenase levels; 51.2% and 41.3% of patients in the ravulizumab arm and eculizumab arm, respectively, achieved all composite endpoint component thresholds (treatment difference: 9.4%; 95% confidence interval: -3.0, 21.5). The composite endpoint provided a single and simultaneous measurement of overall benefit for patients receiving treatment for PNH. Use of the composite endpoint in future PNH research is recommended to determine clinical benefit, and its use in health technology assessments should be evaluated.

Background The short-form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the negative effects of headaches on normal activity. It was developed using the general headache population and prior to the establishment of the now well-accepted FDA patient-reported guidance. Objective The objective of this narrative review was to examine existing qualitative research in patients with migraine and headache, providing insight into the relevance and meaningfulness of HIT-6 items to the lives of migraine patients. Methods Articles were identified through database searches (National Library of Medicine and Google Scholar) and review of reference lists of candidate articles. Results A total of 3227 articles were identified through database and hand searching. Of these, 12 contained patient- or expert-generated qualitative information regarding headache patients' experience (8 specific to migraine [episodic and chronic] patients and 4 citing general headache patients). The combined publications described a total of 283 patient interviews. Overarching themes and specific information were identified that provide support of the relevance of content for each HIT-6 item to migraine patients' lives. Identified effects of headaches on patients with migraine included limitations in daily activities, needing to lie down during headaches, feeling tired, being irritated by headaches, difficulty concentrating, and the experience of pain. Further, previous research specific to the HIT-6 indicated that patients understood the instructions, items, and response scales as intended by the instrument authors. Conclusions This narrative literature review demonstrates qualitative research support for the relevance of the items of the HIT-6 in migraine patients, supporting its ongoing use in clinical migraine research and practice.

BackgroundThere is no valid and reliable patient self-reported measure assessing symptomology among outpatients with COVID-19. The Symptoms Evolution of COVID-19 (SE-C19) is a self-administered new instrument that includes 23 symptoms, each rated for severity at their worst moment within the last 24 hours. We studied the psychometric properties of SE-C19.MethodsReliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the SE-C19 were assessed in 657 outpatients with confirmed COVID-19 enrolled in NCT04425629. SE-C19 and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) were administered daily from baseline (predose at Day 1) to end of study (Day 29).FindingsMost patients (70·0%) were aged ≤50 years and white (85·5%). At baseline, patients reported an average (SD) of 6·6 (3·9) symptoms (ie, rated as at least Mild) with 3·8 (3·3) of these symptoms being rated as Moderate or Severe. By Day 29, most symptoms had resolved; 74·4% of patients reported no symptoms and on average, only 0·6 (SD 1·5) symptoms were reported as at least Mild.Stable patients according to the PGIS showed scores with intraclass correlation values indicating moderate-to-good test-retest reliability (ie, 0·50-0·90). At baseline, 20 item scores (87%) varied significantly across PGIS defined groups supporting the validity of SE-C19.A symptom-resolution endpoint was defined after excluding the item “Sneezing”, due to its low ability to discriminate severity levels, and “Confusion”, “Rash”, and “Vomiting”, due to their low prevalence in this population. Symptoms resolution required complete absence of all remaining items, except “Cough”, “Fatigue”, and “Headache”, which could be Mild or Moderate in severity.InterpretationWe identified 19 items that are valid and reliable to measure disease-related symptoms in COVID-19 outpatients and propose a definition of symptom resolution that could be used in future clinical trials and potentially, also in clinical practice.FundingThis research was funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Research in contextEvidence before this studyThe majority of COVID-19-infected patients (>80%) have mild-to-moderate symptoms and are managed at an outpatient setting. Although clinical research has primarily focused on prevention of the disease and the treatment of hospitalised patients, close monitoring of the COVID-19 symptoms and their severity in outpatients is equally important and needed to prevent community transmission. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are a key method to assess COVID-19 related symptoms and associated burden as these symptoms are best known by the patient and are best measured from the patient perspective. However, a valid and reliable instrument to assess symptom severity and progression among outpatients with COVID-19 is not yet available. This study focuses on the psychometric properties (reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change) of a new recently developed self-administered PRO symptom measure (SE-C19) for COVID-19-positive outpatients.Added value of this studyThis is the first study to systematically examine the psychometric properties of a PRO symptom measure designed for COVID-19 outpatients and it provides a method for identifying symptom resolution among outpatients, which may be useful in clinical research and clinical practice contexts. The SE-C19 instrument is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the severity of 23 COVID-19-related symptoms. The recall period is 24 hours and the response options include None, Mild, Moderate and Severe. The analyses reported here demonstrate that the SE-C19 is a valid and reliable measure to capture daily COVID-19 symptom severity from the outpatient’s perspective. These psychometric analyses also provide empirical evidence for a method to determine symptoms resolution based on the score of 19 of the SE-19 items; this may be useful not only in clinical trials but also in real-world studies and clinical practice. The 4 items not included in the symptoms resolution endpoint may be useful to clinicians to monitor severe disease.The SE-C19 instrument is relevant for the clinical management of outpatients, as it measures a large number of symptoms that are relevant in the outpatient setting and reflect the heterogeneity of symptom experience, and it is sensitive to the longitudinal changes in the severity of these symptoms.Implications of all the available evidenceThe SE-C19 can be used to monitor COVID-19-related symptoms over time in outpatients. The definition of symptoms resolution established here can be used to inform clinical trial endpoints and may also be useful in clinical practice to aid discussions between healthcare professionals and patients, and inform treatment decisions. Symptoms resolution is based on 19 of the 23 items included in the SE-C19 instrument.

Cáncer del tracto biliar; Estudio de entrevista; Investigación cualitativa Càncer del tracte biliar; Estudi d'entrevista; Recerca qualitativa Biliary tract cancer; Interview study; Qualitative research Introduction Patients living with biliary tract cancer (BTC) experience a decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the patient experience of BTC-related signs/symptoms and the impacts of these on daily functioning and HRQoL. Methods Patients with BTC participated in qualitative semi-structured concept elicitation interviews. Signs/symptoms and impacts of BTC were initially explored by targeted literature searches and interviews with five clinicians. Patient interviews were transcribed and coded using qualitative research software. Concept saturation was assessed over five interview waves. A sign/symptom or impact was defined as “salient” if mentioned by ≥ 50% of patients, with a mean disturbance rating of ≥ 5 (0–10 scale). A conceptual model of the patient experience of BTC-related signs/symptoms and impacts was produced. Results Twenty-three patients from the USA (78% women; median age: 54 years), diagnosed as having early (n = 3), locally advanced (n = 11) or metastatic (n = 9) disease, were interviewed. Sixty-six signs/symptoms and 12 impacts were identified. Of these, 46 signs/symptoms and 8 impacts were not identified from the targeted literature or clinician interviews. Concept saturation was reached by the fourth of five interview waves. Fourteen disease-related signs/symptoms (including fatigue/lack of energy, abdominal pain, lack of appetite, insomnia and diarrhoea) and three impacts (physical, emotional and cognitive impacts) were deemed “salient”. The conceptual model included 50 signs/symptoms and 12 impacts. Conclusion Patients with BTC reported a range of signs/symptoms and impacts that negatively affect daily functioning and HRQoL. This project was funded by AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Research and publication fees are funded by the study sponsor.

Bring-your-own-device (BYOD) methods for collecting patient-reported outcome (PRO) data in clinical trials can decrease patient burden and improve data quality. However, adoption of BYOD in clinical trials is limited by the absence of publicly available case studies where BYOD PRO data supported regulatory medical product approvals. Anecdotally, we are aware of multiple examples where efficacy and safety label claims were based on BYOD PRO data; however—except for one—these examples have not been made public. The absence of these case studies can lead sponsors to be hesitant to use BYOD for capturing primary and secondary PRO-based endpoints in their trials. This commentary outlines the context of the issue faced and concludes with a call for sponsor transparency with regard to BYOD use through publicizing where approved labeling claims were based on BYOD data. We suggest how this data could be systematically captured going forward. Sharing this information will benefit the clinical trials enterprise by increasing confidence in the utilization of BYOD and provide opportunities to enhance patient-centricity.

ImportancePatient-reported outcome instruments are key in assessing COVID-19–related symptoms and associated burden. However, a valid and reliable instrument to assess symptom severity and progression among outpatients with COVID-19 is not yet available.ObjectivesTo assess the extent to which the Symptoms Evolution of COVID-19 (SE-C19) instrument is valid, reliable, and able to detect symptom changes in outpatients with COVID-19, as well as to establish a definition of symptom resolution.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this diagnostic/prognostic study, psychometric properties of SE-C19 were assessed in participants recruited into an ongoing, adaptive, phase 1/2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, during 2020 to 2022. Adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 2.4 g or 8.0 g intravenous casirivimab and imdevimab or placebo, in outpatient centers at 114 sites, from 2 countries (US and Mexico).Main Outcomes and MeasuresReliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the SE-C19 were assessed. SE-C19 and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) were administered daily from predose at day 1 to day 29.ResultsAnalysis was conducted on 657 adult outpatients (342 female patients [52.1%], 562 White patients [85.5%]), and 337 non-Hispanic patients [51.3%]. At baseline, patients reported a mean (SD) of 6.6 (3.9) symptoms (ie, rated as at least mild) with a mean (SD) of 3.8 (3.3) of these symptoms being rated as moderate or severe. Stable patients according to PGIS showed scores with intraclass correlation values indicating moderate-to-good test-retest reliability (ie, 0.50-0.90). At baseline, 20 item scores (87%) varied significantly across PGIS-defined groups, supporting the validity of the SE-C19. A symptom-resolution end point was defined after excluding the item sneezing due to its low ability to discriminate severity levels, and excluding confusion, rash, and vomiting, due to their low prevalence in this population. Symptom resolution required complete absence of all remaining items, except cough, fatigue, and headache, which could be mild or moderate in severity. A total of 19 of 23 items from the SE-C19 instrument were identified as valid and reliable to measure disease-related symptoms in outpatients with COVID-19.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study identified 19 items that are valid and reliable to measure disease-related symptoms in outpatients with COVID-19, and proposed a definition of symptom resolution for potential use in future clinical trials.

Purpose This study aimed to elucidate the patient experience of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to guide patient-centered outcome measurement in drug development. Methods Patients with HCC participated in qualitative interviews to elicit disease-related signs/symptoms and impacts, using discussion guides developed from literature searches and discussions with oncologists. Interview participants rated the disturbance of their experiences (0–10 scale). A conceptual model was developed and mapped against patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments identified from database reviews. Results Interviews were conducted with 25 individuals with HCC (68% were men; median age: 63 years; 12% Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage A; 32% stage B; and 56% stage C) in the USA. Fifty-one HCC-related concepts were identified from the interviews and were grouped into eight sign/symptom categories (eating behavior/weight changes; extremities [arms, legs]; fatigue and strength; gastrointestinal; pain; sensory; skin; other) and four impact categories (emotional; physical; cognitive function; other) for the conceptual model. The most prevalent and disturbing experiences across the disease stages were fatigue/lack of energy and emotional impacts such as frustration, fear, and depression. Abdominal pain and skin-related issues were particularly common and disturbing in individuals with HCC stage C. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and HCC18 were identified as commonly used PRO instruments in HCC studies and captured the relevant signs/symptoms associated with the patient experience. Conclusion Patients with HCC reported a range of signs/symptoms and impacts that negatively affect daily functioning and quality of life. Including PRO measures in HCC clinical trials can provide meaningful patient perspectives during drug development.

Background The GM2 gangliosidoses (GM2), Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases, are rare, autosomal recessive genetic disorders caused by mutations in the lysosomal enzyme β-hexosaminidase A (HEXA) or β-hexosaminidase B (HEXB) genes, respectively. A minority of patients have a late-onset form of disease that presents from late-childhood to adulthood and has a slowly progressive course with prolonged survival. Little research has been published documenting patient experiences with late-onset Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases and how the disease impacts their daily lives and functioning. This study explored the most frequent symptoms and functional impacts experienced by patients with late-onset GM2 gangliosidosis through interviews with patients and caregivers. Methods A qualitative research study design was employed, using three focus groups and 18 one-on-one interviews with patients who were recruited at the National Tay-Sachs and Allied Diseases Annual Family Conference. Transcripts were generated from the discussions, and patient quotes were analyzed using a content analysis approach. Concepts were aggregated into symptom and functional impacts, and the frequency of mention in the focus groups and individual interviews was calculated. Key findings Many of the frequently described symptoms [muscle weakness (n = 19, 95%), “clumsy” gait (n = 12, 60%), fatigue (n = 10, 50%)] and impacts [difficulty walking (n = 19, 95%), falling (n = 17, 85%), and climbing stairs (n = 16, 80%)] disclosed by patients and caregivers were similar to those previously reported in the literature. However, less frequently described symptoms such as gastrointestinal issues (n = 4, 20%) and coughing fits (n = 5, 25%) have been expanded upon. This study evaluated the immediate impact of these symptoms on the patients’ lives to highlight the burden of these symptoms and the functional limitations on daily living activities, independence, and emotional well-being. The findings were used to develop a conceptual disease model that could serve as a foundation for patient-centered outcomes in clinical trials and provide insights to the medical community that may benefit patient care. Conclusions This study contributes to the current understanding of symptoms associated with late-onset GM2 gangliosidosis, and further identifies the many consequences and impacts of the disease. These symptoms and impacts could be measured in clinical trials to examine the effects of novel treatments from the patient perspective.

This study demonstrates the quantitative characteristics of the first patient‐reported outcome (PRO) tool developed for patients with nontransfusion‐dependent β‐thalassemia (NTDT), the NTDT‐PRO©. A multicenter validation study was performed over 24 weeks, involving 48 patients from Italy, Lebanon, Greece, and Thailand. Most patients were female (68.8%), with a median age of 34.5 years (range, 18‐52); 66.7% were diagnosed with β‐thalassemia intermedia, and median time since diagnosis was 22 years (range, 0‐43). The NTDT‐PRO comprises 6 items across 2 domains (Tiredness/Weakness and Shortness of Breath [SoB]), and was valid and reliable, with good consistency. At baseline, most patients reported symptoms as present via the NTDT‐PRO, and were highly compliant, ≥90% completing the NTDT‐PRO tool. In a pairwise correlation analysis, all items were positively correlated. Correlations between NTDT‐PRO and existing tools—36‐Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF‐36v2) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Anemia (FACT‐An)—were assessed at weeks 1, 3, and 12; robust correlations were seen between SoB and SF‐36v2‐Vitality (r s = −0.53), and between SoB and Fact‐An‐Fatigue Experience (r s = −0.66) at week 1. Internal consistency was high for both Tiredness/Weakness (Cronbach alpha, 0.91) and SoB (Spearman‐Brown coefficient, 0.78); intraclass correlation coefficients were high (Tiredness/Weakness, 0.88 and 0.97; SoB, 0.92 and 0.98), demonstrating stability. Further studies are required to fully support the validity of this tool, this study demonstrated the usefulness of the NTDT‐PRO in the clinical setting and for longitudinal clinical research, particularly in trials where patient health‐related quality of life is expected to change.

Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is a rare genetic disorder due to the absence or deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme resulting in slowly progressing reduction of muscle strength, causing difficulties with mobility and respiration. Wearable technologies offer novel options to evaluate mobility in a real-world setting. LOPD patients self-reporting LOPD, ≥18 years, US residents, walking (with or without aid), and not on invasive ventilation were recruited for a 6- to 8-week wearable study via patient organizations. Eligible patients were shipped a wearable tracker (Fitbit One™) and completed self-assessment questionnaires. Mobility outcome measures were median step count and peak 1-min activity. In the analyses cohort (N = 29), engagement in data sharing was high (94% of patients uploaded data for more than half the study days). Mean age was 43 years, 90% were females, and 93% were diagnosed in adulthood. Mean delay in diagnosis was 10 years; most had disease onset for ≥10 years (55%); some required walking aid (17%) and breathing assistance (38%). Mean step count differed by age (20–39 years: 4071 vs. 40–69 years: 2394, p p p p r = −0.42, p r = −0.49, p

This study demonstrates the quantitative characteristics of the first patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool developed for patients with nontransfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (NTDT), the NTDT-PRO© . A multicenter validation study was performed over 24 weeks, involving 48 patients from Italy, Lebanon, Greece, and Thailand. Most patients were female (68.8%), with a median age of 34.5 years (range, 18-52); 66.7% were diagnosed with β-thalassemia intermedia, and median time since diagnosis was 22 years (range, 0-43). The NTDT-PRO comprises 6 items across 2 domains (Tiredness/Weakness and Shortness of Breath [SoB]), and was valid and reliable, with good consistency. At baseline, most patients reported symptoms as present via the NTDT-PRO, and were highly compliant, ≥90% completing the NTDT-PRO tool. In a pairwise correlation analysis, all items were positively correlated. Correlations between NTDT-PRO and existing tools-36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An)-were assessed at weeks 1, 3, and 12; robust correlations were seen between SoB and SF-36v2-Vitality (rs = -0.53), and between SoB and Fact-An-Fatigue Experience (rs = -0.66) at week 1. Internal consistency was high for both Tiredness/Weakness (Cronbach alpha, 0.91) and SoB (Spearman-Brown coefficient, 0.78); intraclass correlation coefficients were high (Tiredness/Weakness, 0.88 and 0.97; SoB, 0.92 and 0.98), demonstrating stability. Further studies are required to fully support the validity of this tool, this study demonstrated the usefulness of the NTDT-PRO in the clinical setting and for longitudinal clinical research, particularly in trials where patient health-related quality of life is expected to change.

To estimate the incremental cost, cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost ratio of incorporating a significant other (SO) into motivational intervention for alcohol misuse.We obtained economic data from the one year with the intervention in full operation for patients in a recent randomized trial.The underlying trial took place at a major urban hospital in the United States.The trial randomized 406 (68.7% male) eligible hazardous drinkers (196 during the economic study) admitted to the emergency department or trauma unit.The motivational interview condition consisted of one in-person session featuring personalized normative feedback. The significant other motivational interview condition comprised one joint session with the participant and SO in which the SO's perspective and support were elicited.We ascertained activities across 445 representative time segments through work sampling (including staff idle time), calculated the incremental cost in per patient of incorporating an SO, expressed the results in 2014 US$, incorporated quality and mortality effects from a closely related trial and derived the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.From a health system perspective, the incremental cost per patient of adding an SO was $341.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) = $244.44-437.74]. The incremental cost per year per hazardous drinker averted was $3623 (CI = $1777-22,709), the cost per QALY gained $32,200 (CI = $15,800-201,700), and the benefit-cost ratio was 4.73 (95% CI = 0.7-9.66). If adding an SO into the intervention strategy were concentrated during the hours with highest risk or in a trauma unit, it would become even more cost-beneficial.Using criteria established by the World Health Organization (cost-effectiveness below the country's gross domestic product per capita), incorporating a significant other into a patient's motivational intervention for alcohol misuse is highly cost-effective.

Background: Heart failure (HF) reduces patient quality of life more than other chronic illnesses. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that is completed directly by the patient and is commonly used to address the patient's perspective on HF in clinical trials. The FDA Guidance on using PROs in clinical programs emphasizes the need to use qualitative patient interviews to ensure that a PRO instrument addresses all relevant concepts in a clinical area and that it is easily understood by patients. Objectives: The goal of this project was to assess patient insights regarding HF symptoms, physical limitations, and other impacts and to compare these to the content of the KCCQ, and to see how well patients understand the KCCQ items. Methods: Participants were 28 stable Class II - IV NYHA heart failure patients ages 42 to 90. Fifteen patients were interviewed to elicit patient insights and 13 patients were interviewed to assess patient comprehension of the KCCQ items. Results: The most commonly endorsed HF symptoms and impacts are listed in the table . These concepts are assessed in the KCCQ. The majority of the KCCQ items were rated as highly or somewhat relevant by 66% or more of the patients interviewed; items assessing ability to dress and shower/bathe, need to sleep sitting up, and limitations in visiting friends or family were rated as relevant by less than 50% of patients. Patients generally understood the instructions, items, and response options of the KCCQ with no problems or complications. Conclusions: Qualitative data from this study support the significance of the concepts measured by the KCCQ, such as HF symptoms and physical limitations. Thus, the KCCQ and other measures of these concepts may be useful as endpoints in development programs of novel drugs that may potentially have an impact on the burden of illness of HF in terms of symptoms and physical limitations. Category Examples/patient descriptions Percent of patients endorsing symptom or impact Symptoms Breathing problems Shortness of breath, wheezing 93% Tiredness Drowsy, exhausted 93% Swelling Legs when up and going all day 67% Impacts Physical mobility Get light headed when I bend down 93% Physical limitations Steer away from anything strenuous 93% Emotional effects Anxiety about shortness of breath 87%