Search

BackgroundPatients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are at high risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases. A potent and selective HER2 inhibitor with good blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration is highly desirable.MethodsThe design and structure-activity relationship of DZD1516 was described. The potency and selectivity of DZD1516 were determined by enzymatic and cellular assays. The antitumor activity of DZD1516 monotherapy or in combination with HER2 antibody-drug conjugate was assessed in CNS and subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. A phase 1 first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of DZD1516 in patients with HER2+ MBC who relapsed from standard of care.ResultsDZD1516 showed good selectivity against HER2 over wild-type EGFR in vitro and potent antitumor activity in vivo. Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received DZD1516 monotherapy treatment across six dose levels (25-300 mg, twice daily). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 300 mg, and thus 250 mg was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. The most common adverse events included headache, vomiting, and hemoglobin decreased. No diarrhea or skin rash was observed at ≤ 250 mg. The mean Kp,uu,CSF was 2.1 for DZD1516 and 0.76 for its active metabolite DZ2678. With median seven lines of prior systemic therapy, the best antitumor efficacy in intracranial, extracranial and overall lesions was stable disease.ConclusionsDZD1516 provides positive proof of concept for an optimal HER2 inhibitor with high BBB penetration and HER2 selectivity. Further clinical evaluation of DZD1516 is warranted, with the RP2D being 250 mg BID.Clinicaltrialsgov identifier NCT04509596. Registered on August 12, 2020; Chinadrugtrial: CTR20202424 Registered on December 18, 2020.

Objective To investigate the efficacy of Zorifertinib in first-line treatment of patients with untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Methods Two patients received Zorifertinib as first-line treatment. The response of tumor treatment was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECEST v1.1) and RANO criteria for brain metastases (RANO-BM). Results Case 1 had EGFR exon 19del mutation and multiple brain metastases at baseline. After 51.4 months of treatment with Zorifertinib, case 1 still maintained partial response (PR) in lung lesions and complete response (CR) in intracranial lesions. Case 2 had EGFR exon 19del mutation and a single brain metastasis at baseline. Case 2 achieved PR in lung lesions and CR in intracranial lesions during the treatment with Zorifertinib. After 13.7 months, lung disease progression (PD) and new single brain metastases occurred. The comprehensive evaluation was PD. Case 1 had three-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), including dry skin, and other TRAEs were rash, abnormal liver function and diarrhea. The TRAEs were generally controllable. Conclusion Zorifertinib has a good effect on controlling intracranial and extracranial lesions in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The efficacy of Zorifertinib is consistent with the EVEREST study. Zorifertinib can be one of the first-line initial treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are at high risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases. A potent and selective HER2 inhibitor with good blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration is highly desirable. Methods The design and structure–activity relationship of DZD1516 was described. The potency and selectivity of DZD1516 were determined by enzymatic and cellular assays. The antitumor activity of DZD1516 monotherapy or in combination with HER2 antibody–drug conjugate was assessed in CNS and subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. A phase 1 first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of DZD1516 in patients with HER2+ MBC who relapsed from standard of care. Results DZD1516 showed good selectivity against HER2 over wild-type EGFR in vitro and potent antitumor activity in vivo. Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received DZD1516 monotherapy treatment across six dose levels (25–300 mg, twice daily). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 300 mg, and thus 250 mg was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. The most common adverse events included headache, vomiting, and hemoglobin decreased. No diarrhea or skin rash was observed at ≤ 250 mg. The mean K p,uu,CSF was 2.1 for DZD1516 and 0.76 for its active metabolite DZ2678. With median seven lines of prior systemic therapy, the best antitumor efficacy in intracranial, extracranial and overall lesions was stable disease. Conclusions DZD1516 provides positive proof of concept for an optimal HER2 inhibitor with high BBB penetration and HER2 selectivity. Further clinical evaluation of DZD1516 is warranted, with the RP2D being 250 mg BID. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04509596. Registered on August 12, 2020; Chinadrugtrial: CTR20202424 Registered on December 18, 2020.

Copyright of Lijecnicki Vjesnik is the property of Croatian Medical Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an epithelial malignancy commonly associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection. While bone, liver, and lung metastases are well-documented, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, particularly spinal and meningeal metastases, is extremely rare. We present a 41-year-old male with nasal obstruction and diplopia, diagnosed with locally advanced NPC. After treatment with chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the patient achieved excellent locoregional control. However, months later, he developed persistent back pain, and imaging revealed metastatic deposits in the spine and meninges. Histopathological analysis confirmed metastatic NPC despite resolution of the primary tumor. The patient received palliative radiotherapy and intrathecal chemotherapy, but disease progression highlighted the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of CNS metastases in NPC. This case underscores the need for advanced imaging, histological confirmation, and tailored therapies in managing rare NPC metastases, with long-term follow-up and innovative therapies critical for improving outcomes in advanced disease., Competing Interests: There is no conflict of interest to report., (Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. © The Author(s) 2025.)

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Although alectinib had demonstrated promising intracranial efficacy in several clinical trials, data were limited on its CNS activity in real-world settings. Methods In this retrospective study, ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from six hospitals in China were divided into three cohorts based on the treatment history before the administration of alectinib. ALK-TKI-naive patients were enrolled in cohort 1, cohort 2 included patients who experienced intracranial progression with or without extracranial progression after treatment with crizotinib, and cohort 3 included patients who developed progression only in CNS following treatment with other second-generation ALK-TKIs. The definition and evaluation of intracranial and extracranial lesions were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results Sixty-five patients were eligible and included in our study (cohort 1: 20, cohort 2: 32, cohort 3: 13). For the overall population and patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases, similar intracranial response in CNS target lesions was observed: cohort 1: 81.8% and 80%; cohort 2: 76.5% and 86.7%; cohort 3: 42.8% and 33.3%. For patients in these three cohorts, 75% (6/8), 78.6% (11/14), and 83.3% (5/6) were reported to have significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms respectively. The number of patients who were in need of mannitol or corticosteroids decreased remarkably after the treatment of alectinib (p

Leptomeningeal metastases arise from cancer cell entry into the subarachnoid space, inflicting significant neurologic morbidity and mortality across a wide range of malignancies. The modern era of cancer therapeutics has seen an explosion of molecular-targeting agents and immune-mediated strategies for patients with breast, lung, and melanoma malignancies, with meaningful extracranial disease control and improvement in patient survival. However, the clinical efficacy of these agents in those with leptomeningeal metastases remains understudied, due to the relative rarity of this patient population, the investigational challenges associated with studying this dynamic disease state, and brisk disease pace. Nevertheless, retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, and small prospective trials in the last two decades provide a glimmer of hope for patients with leptomeningeal metastases, suggesting that several cancer-directed strategies are not only active in the intrathecal space but also improve survival against historical odds. The continued development of clinical trials devoted to patients with leptomeningeal metastases is critical to establish robust efficacy outcomes in this patient population, define drug pharmacokinetics in the intrathecal space, and uncover new avenues for treatment in the face of leptomeningeal therapeutic resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: As survival of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer is poor and incidence rates are increasing, there is a growing need for better treatment strategies. In the current study, the efficacy of local and systemic therapies was analyzed in breast cancer patients with CNS metastases. Methods: Medical records from breast cancer patients with brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) treated at a tertiary referral center and a teaching hospital between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively studied. Main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and CNS progression free survival. Analyses were performed among patients with brain metastases (BM) and patients with LM, for the different systemic and local therapies for CNS metastases, and for subgroups based on breast cancer subtypes. Results: We identified 155 patients, 97 with BM and 58 with LM. Median OS was 15.9 months for patients with BM and 1.5 months for patients with LM. Median OS was significantly longer for HER2-positive patients with BM (22.8 months) vs triple negative (8.4 months) and hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (5.9 months) (P < 0.001). Patients with BM receiving both local and systemic therapy also had a longer median OS (21.8 months), compared to the other three subgroups (local therapy only: 9.9 months, systemic therapy only: 4.3 months, no therapy: 0.5 months, P < 0.001). No significant difference in OS was observed between different systemic treatment regimens. Conclusion: Breast cancer patients with BM show longest median OS when the subtype is HER2-positive and when they are treated with both local and systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Genomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be used to detect actionable mutations and guide clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Examining the performance of CSF samples in real-world settings can confirm the potential of CSF genotyping for guiding therapy in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: We included 1,396 samples from 970 NSCLC patients with CNS metastases in real-world settings. All samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing of 1,021 cancer-relevant genes. In total, 100 CSF samples from 77 patients who had previously received targeted treatment were retrospectively analyzed to explore the mechanisms of TKI-resistance. Results: For NSCLC patients with CNS metastases, CSF samples were slightly more often used for genomic sequencing in treated patients with only distant CNS metastases compared to other patients (10.96% vs. 0.81–9.61%). Alteration rates in CSF samples were significantly higher than those in plasma, especially for copy number variants (CNV). The MSAFs of CSF samples were significantly higher than those of plasma and tumor tissues (all p <0.001). Remarkably, detection rates of all actionable mutations and EGFR in CSF were higher than those in plasma samples of treated patients (all p <0.0001). For concordance between paired CSF and plasma samples that were simultaneously tested, the MSAF of the CSF was significantly higher than that of matched plasma cfDNA (p <0.001). From multiple comparisons, it can be seen that CSF better detects alterations compared to plasma, especially CNV and structural variant (SV) alterations. CSF cfDNA in identifying mutations can confer the reason for the limited efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for 56 patients (78.87%, 56/71). Conclusions: This real-world large cohort study confirmed that CSF had higher sensitivity than plasma in identifying actionable mutations and showed high potential in exploring underlying resistance mechanisms. CSF can be used in genomics profiling to facilitate the broad exploration of potential resistance mechanisms for NSCLC patients with CNS metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundGenomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be used to detect actionable mutations and guide clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Examining the performance of CSF samples in real-world settings can confirm the potential of CSF genotyping for guiding therapy in clinical practice.Patients and MethodsWe included 1,396 samples from 970 NSCLC patients with CNS metastases in real-world settings. All samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing of 1,021 cancer-relevant genes. In total, 100 CSF samples from 77 patients who had previously received targeted treatment were retrospectively analyzed to explore the mechanisms of TKI-resistance.ResultsFor NSCLC patients with CNS metastases, CSF samples were slightly more often used for genomic sequencing in treated patients with only distant CNS metastases compared to other patients (10.96% vs. 0.81–9.61%). Alteration rates in CSF samples were significantly higher than those in plasma, especially for copy number variants (CNV). The MSAFs of CSF samples were significantly higher than those of plasma and tumor tissues (all p

Background The efficacy of anti‐programmed cell death‐1/ligand 1 antibody monotherapy (anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy) in patients with active brain metastases (BMs) is not established. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with active BMs. Methods This retrospective study included NSCLC patients treated with second‐line or later‐line anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy between December 2015 and August 2019. Patients were classified into those with or without active BMs, including symptomatic BMs requiring systemic steroids and untreated BMs. The progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients with and without active BMs were compared. Intracranial and extracranial tumor responses were evaluated in patients with active BMs. Results We analyzed 197 patients who had received anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy. Among them, 24 had active BMs. Among those without active BMs, 145 had no BMs and 28 had treated asymptomatic BMs. The PFS and OS of patients with active BMs were significantly shorter than those of patients without active BMs (1.3 vs. 2.7 months; P

Abstract Background Nivolumab has shown promising results against non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its efficacy to treat central nervous system (CNS) metastases, specifically among programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD‐L1)‐negative patients, remains unclear. Case A 66‐year‐old woman was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma stage II and underwent a left lower lobectomy. The histopathological evaluation revealed stage IVA with pleural dissemination. The patient did not harbor an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, and PD‐L1 expression of the surgical specimen using 22C3 assay was 0%. Single brain metastasis was detected, and carboplatin and nab‐paclitaxel were administered. After three cycles, asymptomatic multiple brain metastases were identified, and the patient was treated with nivolumab as second‐line chemotherapy. Six months later, MRI revealed an intracranial complete response (CR). Nivolumab was discontinued after 23 cycles due to immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) of grade 2 rash. However, its effects were sustained for 13 months after discontinuation. We were unable to evaluate the PD‐L1 expression of brain metastases, which may show heterogeneity. Conclusion This case demonstrates that nivolumab effectively treated a patient with negative PD‐L1 expression of the lung harboring CNS metastases.

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Although alectinib had demonstrated promising intracranial efficacy in several clinical trials, data were limited on its CNS activity in real-world settings.Methods: In this retrospective study, ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from six hospitals in China were divided into three cohorts based on the treatment history before the administration of alectinib. ALK-TKI-naive patients were enrolled in cohort 1, cohort 2 included patients who experienced intracranial progression with or without extracranial progression after treatment with crizotinib, and cohort 3 included patients who developed progression only in CNS following treatment with other second-generation ALK-TKIs. The definition and evaluation of intracranial and extracranial lesions were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible and included in our study (cohort 1: 20, cohort 2: 32, cohort 3: 13). For the overall population and patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases, similar intracranial response in CNS target lesions was observed: cohort 1: 81.8% and 80%; cohort 2: 76.5% and 86.7%; cohort 3: 42.8% and 33.3%. For patients in these three cohorts, 75% (6/8), 78.6% (11/14), and 83.3% (5/6) were reported to have significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms respectively. The number of patients who were in need of mannitol or corticosteroids decreased remarkably after the treatment of alectinib (p < 0.001), and there was also a steep fall-over in the number of patients with ECOG ≥2 points before and after the administration of alectinib (p = 0.003). All patients (8/8) diagnosed with LM ± BM experienced substantial alleviation in CNS-related symptoms. In cohort 1 and cohort 2, no significant difference in CNS-time to progression was found between patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic BM when treated with alectinib alone.Conclusions: Our study substantiated the potent CNS activity of alectinib in real-world settings. Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic BM could benefit from alectinib comparatively, which indicated that alectinib alone might defer the timing of local treatment. However, our results should be treated cautiously owing to limited sample size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in breast cancer patients is rising and has become a major clinical challenge. Only few data are published concerning risk factors for the development of CNS metastases as a first site of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients. Moreover, the incidence of CNS metastases after modern neoadjuvant treatment is not clear. Methods We analyzed clinical factors associated with the occurrence of CNS metastases as the first site of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment in the trials GeparQuinto and GeparSixto (n = 3160) where patients received targeted treatment in addition to taxane and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Results After a median follow-up of 61 months, 108 (3%) of a total of 3160 patients developed CNS metastases as the first site of recurrence and 411 (13%) patients had metastatic disease outside the CNS. Thirty-six patients (1%) developed both CNS metastases and other distant metastases as the first site of metastatic disease. Regarding subtypes of the primary tumor, 1% of luminal A-like (11/954), 2% of luminal B-like (7/381), 4% of HER2-positive (34/809), and 6% of triple-negative patients (56/1008) developed CNS metastases as the first site of metastatic disease. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for the development of CNS metastases were larger tumor size (cT3–4; HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.08–2.46, p = 0.021), node-positive disease (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.64–4.04, p

Aim: Compare healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with and without central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Methods: Retrospective matched cohort study using IQVIA's PharMetrics® Plus claims database. Results: Patients with CNS metastases (n = 753) experienced more outpatient, emergency room and inpatient visits versus controls (n = 753; all p < 0.05). In the post-index year, median total all-cause healthcare costs were significantly higher among patients with CNS metastases versus controls ($112,402 vs $50,835; p < 0.0001); outpatient costs primarily drove the cost differential. Conclusion: More effective therapies are needed that improve clinical outcomes and reduce economic burden associated with CNS metastases in patients with HER2+ MBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In the present study IASLC/ATS/ERS classification was useful to identify a high risk population of developing brain metastases in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. • The solid predominant histologic subtype consistently had a significantly higher probability of developing brain metastases even after adjusting by the histological grade and cofounding variables. • According to the histologic grade, moderately differentiated tumors had the highest risk of brain affection irrespective of the lung predominant adenocarcinoma subtype. • IASLC/ATS/ERS classification might suggest more aggressive clinical approaches and closer monitoring in patients with increased hazards for brain metastases development, integrating this classification for risk stratification. Brain metastases (BM) are frequent among lung cancer patients, affecting prognosis and quality of life. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) classification (IASLC/ATS/ERS) has prognostic impact in early-stage disease; however, its role in the advanced setting is not precise. This study aims to determine the correlation between the predominant histological subtype and the risk of developing brain metastases (BM) in locally advanced and metastatic (stages IIIB-IV) LADC. A total of 710 patients with LADC were treated at our institution from January 2010 to December 2017. After excluding patients with brain metastases at diagnoses (n = 151), they were categorized according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS LADC classification to estimate the risk of developing brain metastases. A competing risk analysis was employed, considering death a competing risk event. From 559 patients, the mean age was 59 ± 13.2 years, women (52.4 %), and clinical-stage IV (79.2 %). LADC subtypes distribution was lepidic (11.6 %), acinar (37.9 %), papillary (10.2 %), micropapillary (6.8 %), and solid (33.5 %). A total of 27.0 % of patients developed BM, 32.9 % died without brain affection, and 40.0 % did not progress. The predominantly solid subtype showed the greatest probability of all subtypes for developing BM [HR 4.0; 95 % CI (1.80−8.91), p = 0.0006], followed by micropapillary [HR1.11; 95 % CI (0.36−3.39), p = 0.85). The solid subtype, moderately differentiated tumors, age, and ECOG PS (>2) were associated with increased hazards in the multivariate analysis. According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification, the predominantly solid pattern was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing BM in patients with locally advanced and metastatic LADC. Its prognostic value might help explore novel clinical approaches, modify monitoring for earlier detection, prevent complications, and reduce morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment of brain metastases often includes surgical resection, chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy. Given the difficulty in obtaining therapeutic levels of medications within the immune-privileged central nervous system, chemotherapy as a stand-alone treatment modality for brain metastases is an uncommon option. However, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that immunomodulatory agents can induce a robust immune response in the central nervous system. Here, we describe a 68-year old male who presented with radiographic evidence of new and enlarging lung nodules with mediastinal adenopathy. Lung biopsy was consistent with adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated high expression of programmed cell death protein 1 with a tumor proportion score of 100%. Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated a single enhancing 11 × 7 × 12 mm lesion along the mesial surface of the right frontal lobe. The patient deferred surgical resection as well as stereotactic radiosurgery but agreed to treatment with pembrolizumab. Repeat magnetic resonance imaging at 3-months after initiation of treatment demonstrated complete radiographic resolution of the brain lesion. To our knowledge, this is one of only a few reports in the current literature to document complete resolution of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis with pembrolizumab alone. We discuss the emerging literature regarding the efficacy of pembrolizumab in the treatment of brain metastases, central nervous system penetration, and emerging new treatment paradigms involving novel immunotherapy agents.

Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for up to 85% of all lung cancers. Central nervous system metastases are a common complication of NSCLC and confer a poor prognosis and a dismal survival rate. Treatment is limited, has poor outcomes, and affects patient quality of life. Pembrolizumab is an anti‐PD‐1 antibody that has shown good results for the management of NSCLC. However, its penetration of the central nervous system has not been well studied, and patients with untreated brain metastases are excluded from most clinical trials. Herein, we report two cases of NSCLC with brain metastases in patients successfully treated with pembrolizumab, and discuss the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in these patients. Pembrolizumab has shown good control and the patients have had long progression‐free survival with a high quality of life. Neither patient has experienced serious or grade 3–4 treatment‐related adverse events. Pembrolizumab demonstrates activity in brain metastases in NSCLC patients with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, there may be a role for systemic immunotherapy in patients with untreated or progressive brain metastases.

Treatment of brain metastases often includes surgical resection, chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy. Given the difficulty in obtaining therapeutic levels of medications within the immune-privileged central nervous system, chemotherapy as a stand-alone treatment modality for brain metastases is an uncommon option. However, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that immunomodulatory agents can induce a robust immune response in the central nervous system. Here, we describe a 68-year old male who presented with radiographic evidence of new and enlarging lung nodules with mediastinal adenopathy. Lung biopsy was consistent with adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated high expression of programmed cell death protein 1 with a tumor proportion score of 100%. Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated a single enhancing 11 × 7 × 12 mm lesion along the mesial surface of the right frontal lobe. The patient deferred surgical resection as well as stereotactic radiosurgery but agreed to treatment with pembrolizumab. Repeat magnetic resonance imaging at 3-months after initiation of treatment demonstrated complete radiographic resolution of the brain lesion. To our knowledge, this is one of only a few reports in the current literature to document complete resolution of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis with pembrolizumab alone. We discuss the emerging literature regarding the efficacy of pembrolizumab in the treatment of brain metastases, central nervous system penetration, and emerging new treatment paradigms involving novel immunotherapy agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy of anti‐programmed cell death‐1/ligand 1 antibody monotherapy (anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy) in patients with active brain metastases (BMs) is not established. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with active BMs. Methods: This retrospective study included NSCLC patients treated with second‐line or later‐line anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy between December 2015 and August 2019. Patients were classified into those with or without active BMs, including symptomatic BMs requiring systemic steroids and untreated BMs. The progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients with and without active BMs were compared. Intracranial and extracranial tumor responses were evaluated in patients with active BMs. Results: We analyzed 197 patients who had received anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy. Among them, 24 had active BMs. Among those without active BMs, 145 had no BMs and 28 had treated asymptomatic BMs. The PFS and OS of patients with active BMs were significantly shorter than those of patients without active BMs (1.3 vs. 2.7 months; P < 0.001, and 4.5 vs. 16.3 months; P = 0.001 respectively). For patients with active BMs, the intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, active BMs, poor performance status (PS), and EGFR/ALK positivity were significant factors associated with shorter PFS. Active BMs and poor PS were significant factors associated with shorter OS. Conclusions: This study suggested that anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 monotherapy was not effective for NSCLC patients with active BMs. Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs. Key points: Significant findings of the study: The present study showed that anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibody monotherapy was not effective for non‐small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases. Intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. What this study adds: Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the treatment paradigm for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet the differential efficacy between alectinib and crizotinib in treating patients with NSCLC and central nervous system (CNS) metastases has been insufficiently studied. A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases treated at the Shandong Cancer Centre. Based on their initial ALK-TKI treatment, patients were categorised into either the crizotinib group or the alectinib group. Efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. A total of 46 eligible patients were enrolled in the present study: 33 patients received crizotinib and 13 patients received alectinib. The median OS of the entire group was 66.8 months (95% CI: 48.5–85.1). Compared with the patients in the crizotinib group, the patients in the alectinib group showed a significant improvement in both median (m)PFS (27.5 vs. 9.5 months; P=0.003) and intracranial mPFS (36.0 vs. 10.8 months; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the alectinib and crizotinib groups (not reached vs. 58.7 months; P=0.149). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between patients receiving TKI combined with radiotherapy (RT) vs. TKI alone with respect to mPFS (11.0 vs. 11.7 months, P=0.863) as well as intracranial mPFS (12.5 vs. 16.9 months, P=0.721). In the present study, alectinib exhibited superior efficacy to crizotinib for treating patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases, especially in terms of delaying disease progression and preventing CNS recurrence. Moreover, the results demonstrated that it might be beneficial to delay local RT for patients with ALK-positive NSCL and CNS metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osimertinib shows pronounced efficacy for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including associated central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Tumors inevitably develop resistance to the drug, however. Osimertinib is sometimes readministered after completion of standard chemotherapy. To clarify which patients might receive benefit from osimertinib readministration, we have retrospectively assessed its efficacy with a focus on CNS metastases., Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed for 21 patients who underwent osimertinib readministration at Kyushu University Hospital between March 2016 and April 2023. CNS metastases were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)., Results: Among the 21 enrolled patients, 16 individuals had target lesions on the basis of RECIST. One (6.3%) of these 16 patients achieved a partial response to osimertinib readministration, with the remaining 15 patients showing stable or progressive disease. The median overall progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival for all 21 patients were 3.8 and 13.9 months, respectively. The efficacy of osimertinib readministration for CNS metastases was evaluable in eight patients including five individuals with leptomeningeal metastases. The objective response rate for CNS metastases and the improvement rate for leptomeningeal metastases were both 100%. The median PFS with regard to CNS or non-CNS lesions for these eight patients was 24.7 and 10.5 months, respectively., Conclusions: Osimertinib readministration showed limited efficacy for non-CNS lesions but excellent efficacy for CNS metastases, suggesting that such treatment is an option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with CNS metastases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:E Iwama received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Thermo Fisher Scientific and AstraZeneca. Y Shiraishi received from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, and Bristol Myers Squibb. K Tanaka received honoraria from Nippon Kayaku, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. I Okamoto received honoraria and research funding from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck & Co Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. I Okamoto received honoraria from Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a frequent and severe complication associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown considerable efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, their limited potential to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) renders them less effective in the management of CNS metastases in NSCLC. Osimertinib, a third-generation irreversible EGFR-TKI with good potential to cross the BBB, has shown significant clinical activity and acceptable safety profile in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC brain and leptomeningeal metastases. The progression-free survival (PFS) of up to 15.2 months in CNS metastases patients in the FLAURA trial and the CNS objective response rates (ORRs) of 54% and 43% in the AURA/AURA2 and BLOOM trials, respectively, have established the role of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC with CNS metastases. The AURA3 trial also reported a PFS of 8.5 months and overall ORR of 71%. These data have supported osimertinib to be recognized as a "preferred" first-line treatment for EGFR-positive metastatic NSCLC by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). With limited treatment options available, upfront administration of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC irrespective of EGFR T790M and CNS metastases may improve the overall response rate and potentially reduce the adverse effects of radiotherapy. Our review focuses on the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC CNS metastases in the context of recent NCCN guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer and stroke are the second and third causes of death worldwide; brain metastases (BM) occur in one third of patients with cancer, any neurologic deficit in these population always prompts the clinician to discard metastases for their presence carries a bad outcome. Both might share clinical presentation and differences in their outcome are not entirely known. The aim was to compare risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcome of cancer patients with BM vs stroke. A descriptive study with prospectively acquired data from a cancer referral center included patients seen at the neuro-oncologic unit from March 2011 to February 2018 with confirmed cancer who had BM or stroke. Six hundred and thirteen BM patients were compared with 268 with stroke and cancer. Demographic factors, cancer type, risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcome are presented. Median overall survival in months for those with any stroke was 15 (95%confidence interval [CI] 8.6-21.4)—5 (95%CI 0.12.4) for hemorrhagic stroke and 22 (95%CI 13.4-30.6) in the ischemic group—and for those with BM 12 (95%CI 10.4-13.6). Hemorrhagic stroke commonly found in stroke patients as well as focal motor weakness, aphasia, and altered mental status. BM was more common in breast and lung cancer with headache, visual complaint, and/or vertigo. Survival in cancer patients with BM is not that different than those with stroke, but clinical presentation and risk factors were found different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atezolizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1, is approved for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma. SAUL evaluated atezolizumab in a broader, pretreated population, including patients ineligible for the pivotal IMvigor211 phase 3 trial of atezolizumab. To determine the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in an international real-world setting. Between November 2016 and March 2018 (median follow-up 12.7 mo), 1004 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial or nonurothelial urinary tract carcinoma who experienced progression during or after one to three prior therapies for inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients with renal impairment, treated central nervous system metastases, or stable controlled autoimmune disease were eligible; 10% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 and 98% were platinum pretreated (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02928406). Atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 wk until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). The median treatment duration was 2.8 mo (range 0–19); 22% remained on treatment and 8% discontinued because of toxicity. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 45% of patients. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, asthenia, colitis, and hypertension (each in 1%). Median OS was 8.7 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8–9.9). The 6-mo OS rate was 60% (95% CI 57–63%), median PFS was 2.2 mo (95% CI 2.1–2.4), and the ORR was 13% (95% CI 11–16%; 3% complete responses). Among IMvigor211-like patients (excluding ECOG PS 2 and other IMvigor211 exclusion criteria), median OS was 10.0 mo (95% CI 8.8–11.9) and 6-mo OS was 65% (95% CI 61–69%). SAUL confirms the tolerability of atezolizumab in a real-world pretreated population with urinary tract carcinoma. Efficacy overall and in the IMvigor211-like subgroup is consistent with previous pivotal anti-PD-L1/PD-1 urothelial carcinoma trials. These results support the use of atezolizumab in urinary tract carcinoma, including patients with limited treatment options. In this international study we investigated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab treatment for advanced urinary tract cancer in a large population of pretreated patients, including those who would not normally be candidates for clinical trials. Patients tolerated the treatment well, even if they had autoimmune disease, were being treated with corticosteroids, or had disease that had spread to their brain. Life expectancy in this study for patients typical of everyday clinical practice was similar to that seen in trials that enrolled only selected fitter patients. SAUL confirms the tolerability of atezolizumab in real-world patients with urinary tract carcinoma. Efficacy in the IMvigor211-like subgroup and the broader unselected population was consistent with previous anti-PD-L1/PD-1 pivotal trials, supporting the use of atezolizumab in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately half of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system metastases during the course of their disease which indicate poor prognosis. A part of NSCLC patients demonstrates activating epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations who represent effectiveness and well tolerance of EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy. Although the systemic efficacy of targeted agents is established, the efficacy of central nervous system (CNS) metastases is not as well characterized. In this article, we review recent data on the use of EGFR inhibitors for treatment of patients with NSCLC and CNS metastases.

Brain metastases are detectable in 25–35 % of patients with progressive HER-2-positve breast cancer. Even after spreading metastases into the brain, chemotherapy in combination with anti-HER- 2 therapy improves survival due to better control of the systemic disease. The paper presents the results of investigations substantiating the use of anti-HER-2 targeting agents, as well as the innovative agent T-DM1 to treat brain metastases.

Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for up to 85% of all lung cancers. Central nervous system metastases are a common complication of NSCLC and confer a poor prognosis and a dismal survival rate. Treatment is limited, has poor outcomes, and affects patient quality of life. Pembrolizumab is an anti‐PD‐1 antibody that has shown good results for the management of NSCLC. However, its penetration of the central nervous system has not been well studied, and patients with untreated brain metastases are excluded from most clinical trials. Herein, we report two cases of NSCLC with brain metastases in patients successfully treated with pembrolizumab, and discuss the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in these patients. Pembrolizumab has shown good control and the patients have had long progression‐free survival with a high quality of life. Neither patient has experienced serious or grade 3–4 treatment‐related adverse events. Pembrolizumab demonstrates activity in brain metastases in NSCLC patients with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, there may be a role for systemic immunotherapy in patients with untreated or progressive brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent tumour in women. Triple negative tumours (TNBC)-which are associated with minor survival rates--lack markers predictive of response to anticancer drugs. Triple negative tumours frequently metastasise to the central nervous system (CNS). Objective: The main objective of this study was to study differences in tumour protein expression between patients with CNS metastases and those without this kind of spread, and propose new biomarkers. Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Targeted proteomics and statistical analyses were used to identify possible biomarkers. Results: Proteins were quantified by a targeted proteomics approach and protein expression data were successfully obtained from 51 triple negative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. ISG15, THBS1 and AP1M1 were identified as possible biomarkers related with CNS metastasis development. Conclusions: Three possible biomarkers associated with CNS metastases in TNBC tumours were identified: ISG15, THBS1 and AP1M1. They may become markers predicting the appearance of CNS infiltration in triple negative BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There are no effective central nervous system (CNS) metastases prevention methods in lung cancer patients. Prophylactic cranial irradiation has a limited effectiveness and relatively high toxicity. Systemic chemotherapy is not relevant in reducing the risk of CNS in lung cancer patients. The understanding of molecular background of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients could contribute to the development of personalized treatments for such patients. Areas covered: This article summarizes the latest clinical trials concerning the use of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapies, and immunotherapy in lung cancer patients, with particular consideration of brain lung cancer metastasis prevention. The literature search was undertaken via PubMed and EMBASE searches and relevant articles are included in this review. Expert commentary: The recent data supports that EGFR-TKIs and ALK inhibitors are clinically relevant for first-line treatment to prevent and treat CNS metastases in molecularly selected NSCLC patients. In the future, high hopes for the prevention of CNS metastases in NSCLC patients are associated with immunotherapy concerning immune check-points inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Oncologist is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world with 1.69 million deaths in 2015. A total of 85% of lung cancer cases are non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Driver mutations associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) have been identified in a variety of malignancies, including NSCLC. An ALK inhibitor (crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib) is the preferred therapeutic approach to those advanced ALK fusion variant-positive NSCLC patients. Brigatinib, a next-generation ALK inhibitor, shows promising activity in ALK-rearranged NSCLC that have previously received crizotinib with response rates in ALTA ranging from 42-50%, intracranial response 42-67% and median progression-free survival 9.2-12.9 months. Randomized Phase III trial, ALTA-1 L is investigating brigatinib in ALK inhibitor-naive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While brain metastases (BM) are the most common causes of neurologic disorders in patients with known systemic malignancies, they can often be the initial manifestations of an undetected primary elsewhere. BM are major causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients.Aims: We describe a mixed population (data from both retrospective and prospective collection) having a BM from a solid tumor. We report the percentage distribution of the most frequent types of BM, confirming the data published in the literature. This paper may play a role in presenting the Southeast Asian reality compared with the Western countries.Setting: A tertiary-care cancer centre.Materials and Methods: Data for 4 years were retrieved from the records of the Department of Pathology of our institute. Hematolymphoid and meningeal tumors were excluded. Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stained slides were reviewed, and in cases with an unknown primary, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was advised. The panel of markers was chosen based on the histomorphology on H and E sections. IHC was done in cases with an unknown primary where paraffin blocks were available.Results: Lung cancer was found to be the most common primary malignancy (n = 30; 48.4%) followed by breast cancer (n = 13; 21%), colorectal cancer (n = 6; 9.6%), and skin cancer (melanoma) [n = 3; 4.8%].Conclusion: The incidence of BM from lung and breast cancer was similar to that seen in the Western studies. However, BM from colorectal cancer and melanoma show a higher and lower incidence, respectively, in comparison with the Western literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Somatic mutations in NRAS, PTEN and AKT1 genes are rarely (~1%) reported in primary NSCLC, but their role in carcinogenesis have been proven. Therefore, we assessed the frequency of them in 145 FFPE tissue samples from CNS metastases of NSCLC using the real-time PCR technique. We identified four (two NRAS and single AKT1 and PTEN) mutations in CNS metastases of NSCLC. All mutations were observed in current male smokers (4% out of the male group; 4/100 and 4.25% out of smokers; 4/94). Three mutations have been detected in patients with SqCC (10.3% out of SqCC patients; 3/29), and only one mutation in the NRAS gene-in a patient with adenocarcinoma (1.25% out of AC patients; 1/80). The examined genes were mutually exclusive in terms of molecular background in KRAS; EGFR; DDR2; PIK3CA; HER2 and MEK1 genes that were evaluated in our previous studies. The OS of the patients who harbored NRAS, AKT1 and PTEN mutations was 10.1, 12.1, 7.3 and 4 months, respectively (vs 13.5 months of the studied group). Our results suggest that the presence of NRAS, PTEN and AKT1 gene mutations may have an influence on the occurrence of CNS metastases in patients with SqCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Veterinary Archives / Veterinarski Arhiv is the property of University of Zagreb, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The mitogen-activated protein kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1, MEK2) are fundamental partners in the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway that is involved in regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. Downregulation of the MEK cascades has been implicated in acquiring of the malignant phenotype in various cancers. Somatic mutations in MEK1 gene (substitutions K57N, Q56P, D67N) were described in <1 % of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and they were more commonly reported in adenocarcinoma patients with current or former smoking status. Materials and methods: In the following study, we assessed the MEK1 gene mutations in 145 FFPE tissue samples from central nervous system (CNS) metastases of NSCLC using HRM-PCR and ASP-qPCR techniques. The studied group was heterogeneous in terms of histopathology and smoking status. The prevalence of the MEK1 gene mutation was correlated with the occurrence of mutations in KRAS, EGFR, DDR2, PIK3CA, NRAS, HER2, AKT1 and PTEN genes. Results: Using HRM and ASP-qPCR methods we identified one (0.7 %; 1/145) MEK1 substitution (Q56P) in CNS metastases of NSCLC. The mutation was identified in a single, 50-year-old, current smoking men with adenocarcinoma (1.25 %; 1/80 of all adenocarcinomas). Conclusions: According to the current knowledge, the incidence of MEK1 gene mutation in CNS metastatic lesion of NSCLC is the first such report worldwide. The analysis of gene profile in cancer patients may extend the scope of molecularly targeted therapies used both in patients with primary and metastatic tumors of NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer is the property of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: ALK rearranged Non Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLCs) represent a distinct subgroup of patients with peculiar clinic-pathological features. These patients exhibit dramatic responses when treated with the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor Crizotinib, albeit Central Nervous System (CNS) activity is much less impressive than that observed against extracranial lesions. CNS involvement has become increasingly observed in these patients, given their prolonged survival. Several novel generation ALK inhibitors have been developing to increase CNS penetration and to provide more complete ALK inhibition..Areas Covered: The CNS activity of Crizotinib and novel generation ALK inhibitors will be summarized in this review, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the therapeutic strategies developed to date in this specific subgroup of NSCLCs with a look towards the future. Expert commentary: In the next few years, the results of ongoing comparative head-to-head trials will provide the definitive conclusions on the optimal treatment sequence in ALK-rearranged NSCLCs. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials with novel-generation ALK inhibitors will produce more evidences on the best approach in the growing number of ALK-positive NSCLCs with CNS involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

KRAS mutations are associated with tumor resistance to EGFR TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib) and to monoclonal antibody against EGFR (cetuximab). Targeted treatment of mutated RAS patients is still considered as a challenge. Inhibitors of c-Met (onartuzumab or tiwantinib) and MEK (selumetinib-a dual inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2) signaling pathways showed activity in patients with mutations in KRAS that can became an effective approach in carriers of such disorders. BRAF mutation is very rare in patients with NSCLC, and its presence is associated with sensitivity of tumor cells to BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib). In the present study, the frequency and type of KRAS and BRAF mutation were assessed in 145 FFPE tissue samples from CNS metastases of NSCLC. In 30 patients, material from the primary tumor was simultaneously available. Real-time PCR technique with allele-specific molecular probe (KRAS/BRAF Mutation Analysis Kit, Entrogen, USA) was used for molecular tests. KRAS mutations were detected in 21.4 % of CNS metastatic lesions and in 23.3 % of corresponding primary tumors. Five mutations were identified both in primary and in metastatic lesions, while one mutation only in primary tumor and one mutation only in the metastatic tumor. Most of mutations were observed in codon 12 of KRAS; however, an individual patient had diagnosed a rare G13D and Q61R substitutions. KRAS mutations were significantly more frequent in adenocarcinoma patients and smokers. Additional analysis indicated one patient with rare coexistence of KRAS and DDR2 mutations. BRAF mutation was not detected in the examined materials. KRAS frequency appears to be similar in primary and CNS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Radiation therapy for central nervous system disease commonly involves collaboration between Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery. We describe our early experience with a multidisciplinary clinic model. Methods In 2016, the novel RADIANS (RADIation oncology And NeuroSurgery) clinic model was initiated at a community hospital. Disease and treatment demographics were collected and analyzed. Patient satisfaction was assessed via a blinded survey questionnaire. Results Forty-two patients have been seen since the inception of RADIANS. The median age was 65; and the median patient distance from RADIANS was 42.7 miles (mean = 62.6; range = 0.7–285). Half of the patients traveled >50 miles to receive care, and >80% were seen for central nervous system metastases. Of the patients receiving radiation, 75% received stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy. The mean overall satisfaction from 0 (not satisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) was 4.8. Conclusions The RADIANS clinic model has proved viable and well-liked by patients in a community setting, with the majority of radiation therapy administered being stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy rather than conventional fractionation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Here, we retrospectively review imaging of 68 consecutive unselected patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma for organ-specific response and progression on vemurafenib. Complete or partial responses were less often seen in the central nervous system ( CNS) (36%) and bone (16%) compared to lung (89%), subcutaneous (83%), spleen (71%), liver (85%) and lymph nodes/soft tissue (83%), P < 0.001. CNS was also the most common site of progression. Based on this, we tested in vitro the efficacy of the BRAF inhibitors PLX4720 and dabrafenib in the presence of cerebrospinal fluid ( CSF). Exogenous CSF dramatically reduced cell death in response to both BRAF inhibitors. Effective cell killing was restored by co-administration of a PI-3 kinase inhibitor. We conclude that the efficacy of vemurafenib is variable in different organs with CNS being particularly prone to resistance. Extrinsic factors, such as ERK- and PI3K-activating factors in CSF, may mediate BRAF inhibitor resistance in the CNS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases caused by small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are incurable and therefore fatal. Although such metastases are usually treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, their sensitivity to these treatment measures is unclear. Amrubicin appears to be a promising agent for relapsed SCLC, but its effectiveness in CNS metastases originating from SCLC is unknown. Methods Between April 2002 and December 2009, 110 SCLC patients with CNS metastasis were treated at Shizuoka Cancer Center. Of these, we retrospectively reviewed 8 consecutive cases with CNS metastases originating from relapsed SCLC that were treated with amrubicin as a second-line therapy. Results We recorded three sensitive relapses and five refractory cases. Amrubicin yielded a CNS response rate of 50 % (2 partial responses and 2 complete response; 95 % CI, 21.5-78.5 %) and the disease control rate for CNS lesions was 87.5 % (95 % CI, 52.9-97.8 %). All of the sensitive relapse patients achieved a partial response. The median time to progression for CNS metastases was 150.5 days (95 % CI, 9-171 days), and the median survival time from the start of amrubicin administration was 230.5 days (95 % CI, 89-619 days). We also report a dramatic improvement in one patient's radiological result of intramedullary spinal cord metastasis and alleviation of her symptoms following amrubicin monotherapy including this case series. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that amrubicin is active in patients with CNS metastases originating from SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]