Search

Aims: Cardioversion is a very commonly performed procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is no well-defined protocol to address failed external electrical direct current cardioversion. The aim of the study is to test the efficacy of a pre-defined stepwise cardioversion protocol for patients with persistent AF of ≤12 months. Success was the achievement of sinus rhythm., Methods and Results: The study population included patients with persistent AF of ≤12 months duration requiring rhythm management. Patients were offered cardioversion using a pre-defined stepwise protocol using different electrode placement locations, applying compression at end of expiration, and higher energy delivered simultaneously through two defibrillators. : A total of 414 patients were included in the study, of which 362 (87.4%) required a single successful cardioversion. The remaining 52 (12.5%) patients required additional cardioversion attempts using the stepwise cardioversion protocol with an overall success rate of 99.3%. Two simultaneous defibrillators were required in 14 patients (3.4%). Patients with multiple cardioversions (13.5%) experienced more local skin irritation and pain compared with patients with single cardioversion (13.5% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.004). The predictor for the need for multiple cardioversion attempts is high body mass index, while high transthoracic impedance is associated with failed cardioversion. No major complications were observed during the study., Conclusion: The stepwise cardioversion protocol has a high success rate of >99% and can be safely performed in outpatient or inpatient settings., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmias. An understanding of gender-related differences in AVNRT epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, outcome, and complications can help guide a more effective diagnosis and treatment of the condition. The study aimed to perform a review of the available literature regarding all aspects of gender-related differences of AVNRT. We focused on all aspects of gender-related differences regarding AVNRT between men and women. A literature search was performed using Google Scholar, PubMed, Springer, Ovid, and Science Direct. Many investigations have demonstrated that the prevalence of AVNRT exhibited a twofold women-to-men predominance. The potential mechanism behind this difference due to sex hormones and autonomic tone. Despite being more common in women, there is a delay in offering and performing the first-line therapy (catheter ablation) compared to men. There were no significant gender-related discrepancies in patients who underwent ablation therapy for AVNRT, regarding the acute success rate of the procedure, long-term success rate, and recurrence of AVNRT. AVNRT is more common in women due to physiological factors such as sex hormones and autonomic tone. Catheter ablation is equally safe and efficacious in men and women; however, the time between the onset of symptoms and ablation is significantly prolonged in women. It is important for the medical community to be aware of this discrepancy and to strive to eliminate such disparities that are not related to patients' choices., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)