Search

Objective: This meta-analysis was designed to investigate cardio-renal outcomes and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as a therapeutic option among chronic kidney disease(CKD) patients with GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, regardless of their diabetic status. Method: We conducted a full-scale search from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database to identify eligible studies up to Jun 2024. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cardio-renal outcomes and/or safety of SGLT2i in CKD patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were involved. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for primary outcomes and adverse events were computed by random-effects mode. We used I2 statistic to analyze heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test. Results: Our study incorporated 17 RCTS, including 27,928 patients. In CKD patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, SGLT2i decreased risks of cardiovascular events (seven studies, 17,355 participants, RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70–0.84), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) (seven studies, 17,869 participants, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.82), cardiovascular death (eight studies, 23,079 participants, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.88) and renal composite outcomes (eight studies, 22,525 participants, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.80) with lower risks of any serious adverse effects(fourteen studies, 19,654 participants, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87–0.95), hypoglycemia (nine studies, 16,412 participants, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.98), hyperkalemia (four studies, 2693 participants, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51–0.93) and acute renal injury (five studies, 5424 participants, RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.95) compared to placebo. SGLT2i also slowed eGFR decline (total slopes: five studies, 10,370 participants, mean difference 1.17, 95%CI 0.86–1.49; chronic slopes: four studies, 8459 participants, mean difference 2.12, 95%CI 1.64–2.61). Further subgroup analyses revealed that SGLT2i decreased relative risks of cardiovascular outcomes(three studies, 1075 participants, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54–0.82), HHF(four studies, 1280 participants, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55–1.00) and renal composite outcomes (six studies,4375 participants, RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68–0.88) with no increased adverse events in the CKD 4 patients. Conclusions: SGLT2i significantly improved cardio-renal outcomes and were generally safe in CKD patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Future large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the robustness of these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the association between blood pressure (BP) time in range (TIR) and composite cardiovascular outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2021, 47 patients with PA were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and cardiovascular outcomes were assessed in all patients during the first diagnosis of PA. Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.8 ± 11.4 years. Compared to PA without composite cardiovascular outcomes, the nighttime systolic BP TIR [31.2% (6.2%, 81.2%) vs. 11.5% (0.0%, 29.7%), p = 0.02] and defined daily dose (DDDs) of antihypertensive medication [2.0 (1.0, 2.8) vs. 1.0 (1.0, 2.0), p = 0.03] were lower in PA patients with composite cardiovascular outcomes, while higher glucose (5.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L vs. 5.9 ± 1.5 mmol/L) and prevalence of a history of alcohol intake was higher in PA patients with composite cardiovascular outcomes. There were no differences in age, sex, BMI, smoking, duration of hypertension, lipid levels, aldosteronism, clinic BP, 24-hour mean BP, daytime or nighttime BP, percentage of nocturnal SBP or DBP decline, 24-hour BP TIR, daytime BP TIR, or nighttime DBP TIR between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, nighttime systolic BP TIR was significantly associated with composite cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted OR = 0.92 [95% CI 0.86, 0.99]) in multiple logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: Nighttime systolic BP TIR was significantly associated with composite cardiovascular outcomes in patients with PA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been shown to provide cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their cardiovascular protective efficacy in high-risk T2DM patients, particularly those with a history of cardiovascular events or severe chronic kidney disease, remains uncertain. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with T2DM. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular outcomes. Subgroup analyses and GRADE assessment were also performed. Results: Nine RCTs involving 63,613 patients were included. GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80–0.92), cardiovascular death (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78–0.93), all-cause death (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82–0.93), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), stroke (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77–0.95), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.97). No significant difference in unstable angina (UA) hospitalization was observed (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95–1.15). Subgroup analyses indicated greater benefits with combination therapy, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease. The quality of evidence was rated as "High" for six outcomes and "Moderate" for UA hospitalization. Conclusions: GLP-1 RAs significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in high-risk T2DM patients, especially with combination therapy and in those with chronic kidney disease. However, further research is needed to confirm their long-term effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: There is uncertainty as to whether treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Objectives: To determine whether levothyroxine replacement therapy decreases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among individuals with SCH defined as having a thyrotropin (TSH) level between 5 and 10 mU/L. Design: We conducted a population-based cohort study using a prevalent new-user design. Setting: The study utilized data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants: We identified a base cohort of individuals aged ≥18 years with incident SCH defined as having at least two TSH levels between 5 and 10 mU/L within one year between 1998 and 2018. We matched 76,946 levothyroxine treated to 76,946 untreated individuals based on age, sex, calendar time, duration of SCH, and time-conditional propensity score. We compared individuals with SCH treated with levothyroxine with individuals with no treatment. Exposure: Levothyroxine treatment versus no treatment. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome, MACE, was defined as a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular-related mortality. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 62.8 years, and 76.5% were women. During a median follow-up time of 1.6 years (interquartile range: 0.5–4.2), the incidence rate for MACE among individuals treated with levothyroxine was 12.8 per 1000 person-years; confidence interval (CI): 12.2–13.3 and 13.9 per 1000 person-years; CI: 13.4–14.3 among nontreated individuals. Levothyroxine treatment was associated with a small decreased risk of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.88; CI: 0.83–0.93). Conclusions: Levothyroxine treatment of SCH was associated with a small decreased risk of MACE. However, given the observational nature of the study, residual confounding should be considered in the interpretation of this finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long COVID is a condition where symptoms or complications persist beyond 3 months after COVID-19 infection. Although most athletes experience mild symptoms, those involved in sports with higher cardiovascular demands can develop long COVID, which can negatively impact sports performance. This narrative review aimed to analyze the long COVID in athletes, especially cardiovascular effects; to alert medical and sporting community for the clinical aftermaths of COVID-19, focusing on physical activity; and to discuss the potential return-to-play strategies for these athletes. Methods: An electronic search in PubMed database for articles published between January/2020 and February/2023 was performed including athletic populations with COVID-19, emphasizing long-term complications, especially the cardiovascular effects. Results and Conclusions: While severe cardiac complications are rare, athletes with long COVID often experience symptoms such as fatigue, dyspnea, palpitations, and exercise intolerance. To manage athletes with long COVID, individualized and structured return-to-play programs with the involvement of multidisciplinary teams are crucial. This underscores the importance of recognizing long COVID in athletes, raising awareness of its potential impacts, and implementing strategies to ensure a safe return to play. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: To examine the concept of time in target range for blood pressure (BP) management, exploring its calculation methods, implications for patient outcomes, and potential use in patient care. Recent Findings: Recent post-hoc analyses of clinical trials and observational studies highlight the importance of BP time in target range in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. Higher time in target range correlates with reduced risks of major adverse cardiovascular events including heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Additionally, longer time in target range decreases the risk of incident atrial fibrillation and risk of developing dementia. Summary: BP time in target range is a novel metric offering valuable insights into BP control and its impact on clinical outcomes. Higher time in target range is consistently associated with better cardiovascular outcomes across various patient populations. However, the clinical application of BP time in target range requires further investigation through prospective clinical trials and real-world studies. Integrating wearable devices for continuous BP monitoring could enhance the practical utility of BP time in target range in hypertension management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Given the increased cardio-metabolic risk in patients with acromegaly, this study compared cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and in-hospital outcomes between patients with acromegaly and non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) following pituitary surgery. Methods: This was a nationwide cohort study using data from hospitalized patients with acromegaly or NFPA undergoing pituitary surgery in Switzerland between January 2012 and December 2021. Using 1:3 propensity score matching, eligible acromegaly patients were paired with NFPA patients who underwent pituitary surgery, respectively. The primary outcome comprised a composite of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmias, intracranial hemorrhage, hospitalization for hypertensive crisis) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, surgical re-operation, and various hospital-associated outcomes. Results: Among 231 propensity score-matched patients with acromegaly and 491 with NFPA, the incidence rate of the primary outcome was 8.18 versus 12.73 per 1,000 person-years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–1.32]). Mortality rates were numerically lower in acromegaly patients (2.43 vs. 7.05 deaths per 1,000 person-years; HR, 0.34; [95% CI, 0.10–1.17]). Individual components of the primary outcome and in-hospital outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: This cohort study did not find an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with acromegaly undergoing pituitary surgery compared to surgically treated NFPA patients. These findings suggest that there is no legacy effect regarding higher cardio-metabolic risk in individuals with acromegaly once they receive surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Statin intolerance and myopathy is a major issue with prolonged use of statins myopathy. Bempedoic acid can be a good alternative for those intolerant to statins. This systematic review aims to observe incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other adverse events, in high-risk statin intolerant patients receiving bempedoic acid. Methods: Literature search was conducted via Google Scholar, Science Direct and PubMed, after which screening, selection and data extraction of articles was done. Meta-analysis was performed on RevMan 5.4. Subgroup analysis was also conducted and heterogeneity was evaluated. Risk of bias was performed using ROB2 assessment scale. (CRD42024536827). Results: Only six randomized controlled trials were used in final analysis consisting of 17,844 patients. Treatment with bempedoic acid was associated with a reduced risk of MACE compared with placebo (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.79, 0.94] p = 0.0005), with myocardial infarction significantly reduced. Incidence of adverse effects was increased with bempedoic acid (RR: 1.02; 95% [1.00, 1.03] p = 0.01) but no significant difference was observed. Incidence of myalgia was reduced in bempedoic group as well. Conclusion: Bempedoic acid is a safe and effective alternative to statins in high-risk patients intolerant to statins, decreasing the risk of MACE. Plain Language Summary What is this summary about? Low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) also known as 'bad cholesterol', is the culprit behind many heart diseases. Statins are first-line treatment to reduce LDL-C. Despite being extremely effective, some people are intolerant and experience side effects such as sleep disorders, intestinal diseases and most commonly, effects on muscles ranging from muscle pain to breakdown of muscles leading to kidney damage. Bempedoic acid is a once-a-day medication, increasing LDL-C clearance from blood, reducing the risk of heart attack and diabetes and is effective for patients intolerant to statins. This article provides insights into incidences of major heart-related, and other adverse events in patients receiving bempedoic acid. What were the results? Muscle pain and major heart-related events were reduced (especially heart attack) in patients receiving bempedoic acid as compared with those receiving placebos. Muscle weakness and other adverse events were seen in patients receiving bempedoic acid, but serious adverse events were not significantly different from those receiving placebos. What do the results mean? Bempedoic acid is a safe and effective treatment that can be given to patients who cannot tolerate statins or develop side effects to it, as it reduces the risk of heart-related adverse events. Article highlights Statins are the first-line treatment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), as they reduce low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, its considerable side effects such as myalgia and rhabdomyolysis lead to reduced adherence and intolerance. Bempedoic acid, an ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor, is an effective alternative to statins in high-risk patients who are intolerant to statins. Incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), mainly myocardial infarction, as well as myalgias are reduced with the use of bempedoic acid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have cardiovascular (CV) benefits, particularly in reducing the risk of heart failure (HF). Pioglitazone (Pio) has shown potential in decreasing the risks of recurrent stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality but increasing risks of HF. Our study aimed to examine the synergistic effects on CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who received the combined treatment of SGLT2i and Pio. Materials and Methods: A total of 117,850 patients with T2DM and without a history of HF were selected as the observational study cohort from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) in Taiwan between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. The primary composite outcome was 4-point major adverse CV events (4P-MACE), including CV death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for HF. The study was divided into four groups: a combined treatment group in which SGLT2i and Pio were used, two individual groups in which SGLT2i or Pio was used separately, and a reference group (non-study drugs). Results: Combined treatment of SGLT2i and Pio had the lowest risk of 4P-MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.80) compared with the reference group after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. There was no significant difference in risks of hospitalization for HF (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.49-1.07) compared with the reference group. Conclusions: In T2DM patients without HF, the combined treatment with SGLT2i and Pio may synergistically provide CV benefits without increasing risks of HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purposeof Review: This article summarizes the medical management of obesity with an emphasis on incretin-based therapeutics that target the neuro-hormonal basis of obesity. Recent Findings: Medications that mimic the effect of incretins, a group of peptide hormones released in response to nutrient intake that regulate appetite, result in potent and durable weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of obesity. The SELECT trial demonstrated that semaglutide led to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in patients without diabetes who were either overweight and had preexisting cardiovascular disease or obese. Summary: The treatment of obesity is critical to prevent the progression of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. Incretin-based therapies offer remarkable weight loss and reduce major cardiovascular adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of treadmill stress echocardiography (TSE) in symptomatic patients may be limited. We evaluated whether carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores can predict cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with negative TSE. Methods: Patients who had negative TSE and measured cIMT or CAC scoring were enrolled and followed up. The primary CV outcome was defined as a composite of acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, heart failure, stroke, and CV death. Results: Overall, 1095 patients participated. The median follow-up duration was 5.8 years. Patients with increased cIMT and CAC scores experienced a high incidence of primary CV outcomes (normal vs. increased group on cIMT and CAC scoring: 4.4% vs. 20.0% and 0.4% vs. 25.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). In the Cox proportional hazard model, increased cIMT and CAC scores were associated with increased primary CV outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], p-value for increased cIMT and increased CAC scores = 2.939 [1.241–6.960], p = 0.014 and 45.192 [5.497–371.505], p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with increased cIMT and CAC scores have poor CV outcomes even though they have negative TSE results, and therefore, they should be carefully monitored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Given the limited head-to-head comparison of cardiovascular and renal outcomes between liraglutide and dulaglutide, our study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes between dulaglutide and liraglutide in a real-world setting. In this new-user design, comparative and retrospective cohort study, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with prescription for GLP-1RAs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2022 (n = 8,278) were included. Primary outcome was composite cardiovascular outcomes which was composed of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal ischemic stroke. The composite renal outcome was also interested, including new macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, worsening of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and progression to dialysis. A total of 3,210 subjects receiving liraglutide and 5,068 subjects receiving dulaglutide were identified. In the adjusted cohort by applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, the incidence of composite cardiovascular outcomes was 18.4 and 18.7 events per 1000 person-years in the liraglutide and dulaglutide groups, respectively. The risk of cardiovascular outcomes did not significantly differ between groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85–1.15). Moreover, the risk of composite renal outcomes was also comparable between groups (subdistribution HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.995–1.16). Liraglutide and dulaglutide demonstrated comparable cardiovascular and renal outcomes in a real-world setting.

Abstract Objective This meta-analysis was designed to investigate cardio-renal outcomes and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as a therapeutic option among chronic kidney disease(CKD) patients with GFR

Abstract Heart failure is a highly prevalent disease, which courses with frequent readmissions, mainly by Acute Heart Failure (AHF). Reduced renal function is associated with increased mortality in patients with HF. Therefore, an accurate and precise evaluation of renal function in patients with HF is crucial. The error of estimated GFR (eGFR) is wide and common, showing a ± 30% variability compared to measured GFR (mGFR). However, there is no evidence on the error of formulas in reflecting real renal function and particularly the consequences of this error in patients with AHF. This is a prospective study comparing the impact of mGFR versus eGFR in the onset of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with AHF. This was tested with cox survival analysis. Measured GFR was determined by the plasma clearance of iohexol-dbs and eGFR by Cockroft-Gould, MDRD, CKD-EPI creatinine, CKD-EPI cystatin-C and CKD-EPI creatinine + cystatin-C equations formulas. Also the agreement between mGFR and eGFR was analyzed. A total of 90 patients were included. Average age was 66 (± 12 years) and 52 (58%) were male. Of them 53 patients (59%) had a cardiovascular event during follow-up, 22 fatal (41%). The agreement between mGFR and eGFR indicated moderate precision and accuracy (concordance correlation coefficient of 0.77; CI = 0.73–0.82). In multiple cox survival analysis, mGFR was significantly associated with cardiovascular events together with NTproBNP, BMI, LVEF and previous coronary artery disease (p = 0.037; HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.95–0.99). Estimated GFR by formulas was not significant. In patients with AHF the error of formulas is large, frequent and random, also, mGFR and not eGFR predicted future CV events. The error of eGFR may have clinical consequences in specific subpopulations.

Abstract Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been shown to provide cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their cardiovascular protective efficacy in high-risk T2DM patients, particularly those with a history of cardiovascular events or severe chronic kidney disease, remains uncertain. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with T2DM. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular outcomes. Subgroup analyses and GRADE assessment were also performed. Results Nine RCTs involving 63,613 patients were included. GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80–0.92), cardiovascular death (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78–0.93), all-cause death (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82–0.93), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), stroke (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77–0.95), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.97). No significant difference in unstable angina (UA) hospitalization was observed (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95–1.15). Subgroup analyses indicated greater benefits with combination therapy, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease. The quality of evidence was rated as “High” for six outcomes and “Moderate” for UA hospitalization. Conclusions GLP-1 RAs significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in high-risk T2DM patients, especially with combination therapy and in those with chronic kidney disease. However, further research is needed to confirm their long-term effects.

Abstract Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), leading to high morbidity and mortality. Managing HFpEF in diabetic patients is challenging with limited treatments. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have shown potential cardiovascular benefits. This meta-analysis compares the effects of GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors on HFpEF in T2D patients. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors’ impact on HFpEF in T2D patients. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction, ECV), and functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Results Twelve studies with 3,428 patients (GLP1-RA: 1,654; SGLT2 inhibitors: 1,774) were included. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved LVEF compared to placebo (GLP1-RA: mean difference [MD] 2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 4.1, p

There is a paucity of data on the cardiovascular implications of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, especially among hospitalized patients. Our study aimed to investigate the association between MGUS and cardiovascular outcomes in a hospital setting using the National Inpatient Sample database. MGUS patients were sampled using ICD-10 codes. The patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of MGUS. Comorbidities and cardiovascular outcomes were collected using ICD 10 DM codes. CV outcomes were evaluated before and after 1:1 matching for age, gender, and race. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the matched population, which excluded patients with diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (stages 3–5), dialysis, hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cancer, antiplatelets, and oral anticoagulant use and was adjusted for smoking, dyslipidemia, and aspirin use to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes. MGUS patients had more heart failure, atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, aortic aneurysm, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, conduction disorder, cor pulmonale, peripheral vascular disease, and acute myocardial infarction. After matching, MGUS was associated with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, conduction disorder, cor pulmonale, and peripheral vascular disease. MGUS was linked to a wide spectrum of cardiovascular diseases in an inpatient setting. Further studies are needed to formulate appropriate recommendations for the screening and management of cardiovascular complications in individuals with MGUS.

Abstract Objective The present umbrella review aims to collate and summarize the findings from previous meta-analyses on the Triglyceride and Glucose (TyG) Index, providing insights to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers regarding the usefulness of this biomarker in various clinical settings. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to April 14, 2024, without language restrictions. The AMSTAR2 checklist assessed the methodological quality of the included meta-analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results A total of 32 studies were finally included. The results revealed significant associations between the TyG index and various health outcomes. For kidney outcomes, a high TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.82–2.77) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.32–1.63). High TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (RR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.74–4.54), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.48–3.91), and diabetic retinopathy (DR) (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.31–4.19). Regarding metabolic diseases, the TyG index was significantly higher in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.57–1.15), metabolic syndrome (MD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74–0.93), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.88–2.97) compared to those without these conditions. In cerebrovascular diseases, a higher TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of dementia (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.12–1.16), cognitive impairment (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.38–3.86), and ischemic stroke (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.22–1.54). For cardiovascular outcomes, the TyG index showed significant associations with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12–1.30), atrial fibrillation (AF) (SMD = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.57–1.87), and hypertension (HTN) (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25–1.85). Conclusion The TyG index is a promising biomarker for screening and predicting various medical conditions, particularly those related to insulin resistance and metabolic disorders. However, the heterogeneity and methodological quality of the included studies suggest the need for further high-quality research to confirm these findings and refine the clinical utility of the TyG index. Graphical abstract

Abstract Background There are many sex-specific factors affecting myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes in males and females. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between reproductive factors and cardiovascular outcomes in women after ST-elevation MI. Method This retrospective cohort study was initiated in 2016–2017 at Chamran Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. One hundred eighty women with a diagnosis of ST-elevation MI were followed up for 3 years, and any occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVs) was recorded. All information regarding reproductive factors was recorded via questionnaire. This information was compared between women with cardiovascular events and women without adverse events using a sample t test, chi-square test, and multiple backward logistic regression analysis. SPSS version 24 was used to conduct all analyses. Result Sixty-four women with a mean age of 65.81 ± 13.14 years experienced CV events, and 116 women with a mean age of 65.51 ± 10.88 years did not experience CV events. A history of ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus were more prevalent in women with CV events (P = 0.024 and P = 0.019). After adjusting for ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus, oral contraceptive pill (OCP) usage was more prevalent in women with CV events than in women without CV events (60.9% vs. 40.4%, P = 0.008). There was a greater chance of CV events in women with OCP usage (OR = 3.546, P = 0.038) and a lower chance of CV events in women with greater age at menarche (OR = 0.630, P = 0.009) and longer breastfeeding duration (OR = 0.798, P = 0.041) according to multiple backward logistic regression models. Conclusion Based on this study, OCP consumption is a risk factor, while older age at menarche and longer duration of breastfeeding are protective factors for cardiovascular outcomes in women after STEMI.

Abstract Aims The study aims to provide comprehensive evidence for the selection of agents in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with cardiovascular risk and summarize the lasted evidence for the cardiovascular effects of sodium glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and results Several online databases were searched. All studies that explored the cardiovascular effects of SGLT2i or glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP1‐RA) were screened and reviewed. A total of 38 studies were included. Compared with GLP1‐RA, the use of SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death [risk ratio (RR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44–0.58], hospitalization of heart failure (HHF) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74–0.80), death from any cause (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60–0.68), and myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76–0.87). However, SGLT2i significantly increased the risk of stroke (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.17). Compared with the control group, SGLT2i treatment reduced the risk of cardiovascular death by 14% (RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79–0.94), HHF by 25%, and death from any cause by 9% in patients with HF, regardless of diabetes status. Conclusions SGLT2i is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death, HHF, death from any cause, and MI in patients with T2DM compared with GLP1‐RA. In addition, SGLT2i brought more benefits with respect to the effects of cardiovascular death, HHF, and death from any cause in patients with HF, regardless of diabetes status.

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), leading to high morbidity and mortality. Managing HFpEF in diabetic patients is challenging with limited treatments. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have shown potential cardiovascular benefits. This meta-analysis compares the effects of GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors on HFpEF in T2D patients. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors' impact on HFpEF in T2D patients. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction, ECV), and functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Results: Twelve studies with 3,428 patients (GLP1-RA: 1,654; SGLT2 inhibitors: 1,774) were included. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved LVEF compared to placebo (GLP1-RA: mean difference [MD] 2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 4.1, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 3.2%, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4, p < 0.001). SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced myocardial fibrosis (MD -3.5%, 95% CI -4.2 to -2.8, p < 0.001) more than GLP1-RA (MD -2.3%, 95% CI -3.0 to -1.6, p < 0.001). Functional capacity improved significantly with both treatments (GLP1-RA: MD 45 m, 95% CI 30 to 60, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 50 m, 95% CI 35 to 65, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed reductions in HbA1c (GLP1-RA: MD -1.1%, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.8, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -1.0%, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.7, p < 0.001) and body weight (GLP1-RA: MD -2.5 kg, 95% CI -3.1 to -1.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -2.0 kg, 95% CI -2.6 to -1.4, p < 0.001). Both treatments significantly lowered SBP (GLP1-RA: MD -5.2 mmHg, 95% CI -6.5 to -3.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -4.8 mmHg, 95% CI -6.0 to -3.6, p < 0.001). Conclusions: GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly benefit HFpEF management in T2D patients. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce myocardial fibrosis more effectively, while both improve LVEF, functional capacity, and metabolic parameters. These therapies should be integral to HFpEF management in diabetic patients. Further research is needed on long-term outcomes and potential combined therapy effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The present umbrella review aims to collate and summarize the findings from previous meta-analyses on the Triglyceride and Glucose (TyG) Index, providing insights to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers regarding the usefulness of this biomarker in various clinical settings. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to April 14, 2024, without language restrictions. The AMSTAR2 checklist assessed the methodological quality of the included meta-analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results: A total of 32 studies were finally included. The results revealed significant associations between the TyG index and various health outcomes. For kidney outcomes, a high TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.82–2.77) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.32–1.63). High TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (RR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.74–4.54), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.48–3.91), and diabetic retinopathy (DR) (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.31–4.19). Regarding metabolic diseases, the TyG index was significantly higher in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.57–1.15), metabolic syndrome (MD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74–0.93), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.88–2.97) compared to those without these conditions. In cerebrovascular diseases, a higher TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of dementia (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.12–1.16), cognitive impairment (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.38–3.86), and ischemic stroke (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.22–1.54). For cardiovascular outcomes, the TyG index showed significant associations with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12–1.30), atrial fibrillation (AF) (SMD = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.57–1.87), and hypertension (HTN) (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25–1.85). Conclusion: The TyG index is a promising biomarker for screening and predicting various medical conditions, particularly those related to insulin resistance and metabolic disorders. However, the heterogeneity and methodological quality of the included studies suggest the need for further high-quality research to confirm these findings and refine the clinical utility of the TyG index. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are many sex-specific factors affecting myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes in males and females. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between reproductive factors and cardiovascular outcomes in women after ST-elevation MI. Method: This retrospective cohort study was initiated in 2016–2017 at Chamran Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. One hundred eighty women with a diagnosis of ST-elevation MI were followed up for 3 years, and any occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVs) was recorded. All information regarding reproductive factors was recorded via questionnaire. This information was compared between women with cardiovascular events and women without adverse events using a sample t test, chi-square test, and multiple backward logistic regression analysis. SPSS version 24 was used to conduct all analyses. Result: Sixty-four women with a mean age of 65.81 ± 13.14 years experienced CV events, and 116 women with a mean age of 65.51 ± 10.88 years did not experience CV events. A history of ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus were more prevalent in women with CV events (P = 0.024 and P = 0.019). After adjusting for ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus, oral contraceptive pill (OCP) usage was more prevalent in women with CV events than in women without CV events (60.9% vs. 40.4%, P = 0.008). There was a greater chance of CV events in women with OCP usage (OR = 3.546, P = 0.038) and a lower chance of CV events in women with greater age at menarche (OR = 0.630, P = 0.009) and longer breastfeeding duration (OR = 0.798, P = 0.041) according to multiple backward logistic regression models. Conclusion: Based on this study, OCP consumption is a risk factor, while older age at menarche and longer duration of breastfeeding are protective factors for cardiovascular outcomes in women after STEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prevalence of cancer patients with concomitant cardiovascular (CV) disease is on the rise due to improved cancer prognoses. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long‐term outcomes of cancer patients referred to a cardiology department (CD) via primary care using e‐consultation. Methods: We analysed data from cancer patients with prior referrals to a CD between 2010 and 2021 (n = 6889) and compared two care models: traditional in‐person consultations and e‐consultations. In e‐consultation model, cardiologists reviewed electronic health records (e‐consultation) to determine whether the demand could be addressed remotely or necessitated an in‐person consultation. We used an interrupted time series regression model to assess outcomes during the two periods: (1) time to cardiology consultation, (2) rates of all‐cause and CV related hospital admissions and (3) rates of all‐cause and CV‐related mortality within the first year after the initial consultation or e‐consultation at the CD. Results: Introduction of e‐consultation for cancer patients referred to cardiology care led to a 51.8% reduction (95%CI: 51.7%–51.9%) in waiting times. Furthermore, we observed decreased 1‐year incidence rates, with incidence rate ratios (iRRs) [IC95%] of.75 [.73–.77] for CV‐related hospitalizations,.43 [.42–.44] for all‐cause hospitalizations, and.87 [.86–.88] for all‐cause mortality. Conclusions: Compared to traditional in‐person consultations, an outpatient care program incorporating e‐consultation for cancer patients significantly reduced waiting times for cardiology care and demonstrated safety, associated with lower rates of hospital admissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Patients with heart failure (HF) remain often undertreated for multiple reasons, including treatment inertia, contraindications, and intolerance. The OPTIimal PHARMacological therapy for patients with Heart Failure (OPTIPHARM‐HF) registry is designed to evaluate the prevalence of evidence‐based medical treatment prescription and titration, as well as the causes of its underuse, in a broad real‐world population of consecutive patients with HF across the whole ejection fraction spectrum and among different clinical phenotypes. Methods: The OPTIPHARM‐HF registry (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicenter, observational, national study of adult patients with symptomatic HF, as defined by current international guidelines, regardless of ejection fraction. Both outpatients and inpatients with chronic and acute decompensated HF will be recruited. The study will enroll up to 2500 patients with chronic HF at approximately 35 Italian HF centres. Patients will be followed for a maximum duration of 24 months. The primary objective of the OPTIPHARM‐HF registry is to assess prescription and adherence to evidence‐based guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with HF. The primary outcome is to describe the prevalence of GDMT use according to target guideline recommendation. Secondary objectives include implementation of comorbidity treatment, evaluation of sequence of treatment introduction and up‐titration, description of GDMT implementation in the specific HF population, main causes of GDMT underuse, and assessment of cumulative rate of cardiovascular events. Conclusion: The OPTIPHARM‐HF registry will provide important implications for improving patient care and adoption of recommended medical therapy into clinical practice among HF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a paucity of data on the cardiovascular implications of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, especially among hospitalized patients. Our study aimed to investigate the association between MGUS and cardiovascular outcomes in a hospital setting using the National Inpatient Sample database. MGUS patients were sampled using ICD-10 codes. The patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of MGUS. Comorbidities and cardiovascular outcomes were collected using ICD 10 DM codes. CV outcomes were evaluated before and after 1:1 matching for age, gender, and race. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the matched population, which excluded patients with diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (stages 3–5), dialysis, hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cancer, antiplatelets, and oral anticoagulant use and was adjusted for smoking, dyslipidemia, and aspirin use to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes. MGUS patients had more heart failure, atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, aortic aneurysm, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, conduction disorder, cor pulmonale, peripheral vascular disease, and acute myocardial infarction. After matching, MGUS was associated with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, conduction disorder, cor pulmonale, and peripheral vascular disease. MGUS was linked to a wide spectrum of cardiovascular diseases in an inpatient setting. Further studies are needed to formulate appropriate recommendations for the screening and management of cardiovascular complications in individuals with MGUS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Withania somnifera, commonly known as Ashwagandha, has been popular for many years. Numerous studies have shown that the extract of this plant, due to its wealth of active substances, can induce anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, immunomodulatory, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, anti-diabetic, adaptogenic, anti-arthritic, anti-stress, and antimicrobial effects. This review examines the impact of Ashwagandha extract on the vascular endothelium, inflammation, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular outcomes. Studies have shown that Ashwagandha extracts exhibit an anti-angiogenic effect by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced capillary sprouting and formation by lowering the mean density of microvessels. Furthermore, the results of numerous studies highlight the anti-inflammatory role of Ashwagandha extract, as the action of this plant causes a decrease in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Interestingly, withanolides, present in Ashwagandha root, have shown the ability to inhibit the differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes. Research results have also proved that W. somnifera demonstrates cardioprotective effects due to its antioxidant properties and reduces ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis. It seems that this plant can be successfully used as a potential treatment for several conditions, mainly those with increased inflammation. More research is needed to elucidate the exact mechanisms by which the substances contained in W. somnifera extracts can act in the human body. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This review aims to evaluate intensive blood pressure control in older adults, assessing its necessity, effectiveness, benefits and risks including cardiovascular outcomes, adverse events, quality of life, and overall mortality. Recent Findings: Recent studies have supported that intensive antihypertensive treatment lowers the rates of cardiovascular events compared to standard treatment in older patients with hypertension, and it may also reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Summary: Intensive blood pressure lowering strategies are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as all-cause mortality, without compromising quality of life or functional status, and are relatively well tolerated in this patient population. Evidence suggests that maintaining systolic blood pressure below 130 mm Hg can yield cardiovascular and cognitive benefits in older patients with hypertension, particularly among those at risk of myocardial infarction or stroke. However, clinicians should vigilantly monitor for adverse events and engage in shared decision-making when pursuing intensive blood pressure goals tailored to individual risks and benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Evaluating safety is as important as evaluating efficacy in a clinical trial, yet the tradition for safety analysis is rudimentary. This article explores more complex methodologies for safety evaluation, with the aim of improving the interpretability, as well as generalizability, of the results. Methods: For studies where the analysis periods vary over the subjects, using the International Council for Harmonisation estimand framework, we construct a formal estimand that could be used in the setting of safety surveillance that answers the clinical question of 'What is the magnitude of the increase in risk of experiencing an adverse event if the treatment is taken, as prescribed, for a specific period of time?'. Estimation methodologies for this estimand are also discussed. Results: The proposed estimand is similar to that found in the efficacy analyses of time to event data (e.g. in outcome studies), with the key difference of utilization of hypothetical intercurrent event strategy for the intercurrent event of treatment discontinuation. This is motivated by what we perceive to be a key difference for the safety objective compared to efficacy objectives, namely a desire for sensitivity (i.e. greater possibility of detecting a negative impact of the drug, if such exists) as opposed to the need to prove a positive effect of the drug in a conservative manner. Conclusion: It is valuable, and possible, to use the International Council for Harmonisation estimand framework not only for efficacy but also for safety evaluation, with the estimand driven by an interpretable, and relevant, clinical question. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The COVID‐19 pandemic disrupted clinical research. CLEAR Outcomes investigated the effect of bempedoic acid (BA) versus placebo in 13 970 patients with statin intolerance and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. BA reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) by 13%. CLEAR Outcomes began before and continued for 2.7 years after the start of the pandemic. Methods: The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on patient disposition, adverse events, and major adverse CV events (MACE) in CLEAR Outcomes was assessed. Results: Rates of severe infection, hospitalization, or first MACE associated with a positive COVID‐19 test were low and balanced between treatment groups. Rates of all‐cause death, non‐CV death, and undetermined death increased in the pandemic period compared with the pre‐pandemic period, while rates of CV death with a known etiology remained stable. A sensitivity analysis excluding undetermined deaths occurring after the onset of the pandemic from the CV death designation yielded hazard ratios of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93) for the primary endpoint and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76–1.16) for the secondary endpoint of CV death, compared with 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79–0.96) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.88–1.24), respectively, in the original analysis. Conclusion: The CLEAR Outcomes trial continued uninterrupted throughout the COVID‐19 pandemic. Certain trial endpoints may have been impacted by the pandemic. Specifically, the classification of undetermined deaths as CV deaths may have attenuated the effect of BA on key efficacy endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for several malignant and non-malignant hematologic conditions. However, patients undergoing HSCT are at increased risk of developing serious cardiovascular events. Whether cardiovascular risks differ by the type of transplantation strategy used, allogeneic versus autologous HSCT, is unknown. Leveraging the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2019), we assessed the incidence of early cardiovascular events by HSCT mode (allogeneic vs autologous). The primary outcome was the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The secondary outcome was the occurrence of any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as acute heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI), symptomatic atrial or ventricular arrhythmia or heart block, and cardiovascular death. Outcomes were compared between those undergoing allogeneic versus autologous HSCT. Multivariable regression, adjusting for cardiovascular and cancer-related factors, was used to define the association between pre-HSCT factors and MACE. We further assessed the effect of acute cardiovascular events on in-patient mortality by calculating adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Overall, 64,705 weighted hospitalizations for HSCT were identified, of which 22,655 (35.0%) were allogeneic HSCT and 42,050 (65.0%) were autologous HSCT. The prevalence of AF was 9.1%, and 12.1% for any arrhythmia. In multivariable regression, allogeneic HSCT was associated with higher adjusted odds of peri-HSCT acute heart failure (aOR 2.64; 1.86–3.76; p < 0.0001), QT prolongation (aOR 1.40; 1.04–1.88; p = 0.025), MI (aOR 2.87; 1.16–7.11; p = 0.023), any major cardiovascular complication (aOR 1.16; 1.03–1.32; p = 0.016), and inpatient mortality (aOR 4.87; 3.60–6.58; p < 0.0001). Following cerebrovascular events, AF was the strongest predictor of mortality. Allogeneic HSCT was associated with higher odds of in-hospital cardiovascular complications among patients undergoing HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review provides an overview of the efficacy and safety of renal sympathetic denervation as a therapeutic approach for resistant hypertension. While the initial enthusiasm was sparked by the results of early clinical trials, it was dampened by the findings of the Symplicity HTN-3 study. However, recent advances in catheter technology and more refined patient selection criteria have yielded more promising results. Subsequent studies, such as SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED and RADIANCE II, demonstrated significant reductions in blood pressure, even in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Despite the lack of robust data on major clinical outcomes, investigations into the time in therapeutic range for patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation suggested potential cardiovascular benefits. Nevertheless, further research is needed to thoroughly understand the long-term impact, assess cost-effectiveness, and accurately identify which patient subgroups may derive the greatest benefits from this therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Alirocumab improves cardiovascular outcomes after ACS irrespective of sex. • Reduction of total cardiovascular events was greater at higher baseline Lp(a). The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (NCT01663402) compared the effects of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We assessed efficacy and safety of alirocumab versus placebo according to sex and lipoprotein(a) level. This prespecified analysis compared the effects of alirocumab versus placebo on lipoproteins, MACE (coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal/non-fatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization), death, total cardiovascular events, and adverse events in 4762 women and 14,162 men followed for a median of 2.8 years. In post-hoc analysis, we evaluated total cardiovascular events according to sex, baseline lipoprotein(a), and treatment. Women were older, had higher baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (89.6 vs 85.3 mg/dL) and lipoprotein(a) (28.0 vs 19.3 mg/dL) and had more co-morbidities than men. At 4 months, alirocumab lowered LDL-C by 49.4 mg/dL in women and 54.0 mg/dL in men and lipoprotein(a) by 9.7 and 8.1 mg/dL, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Alirocumab reduced MACE, death, and total cardiovascular events similarly in both sexes. In the placebo group, lipoprotein(a) was a risk factor for total cardiovascular events in women and men. In both sexes, reduction of total cardiovascular events was greater at higher baseline lipoprotein(a), but this effect was more evident in women than men (p interaction =0.08). Medication adherence and adverse event rates were similar in both sexes. Alirocumab improves cardiovascular outcomes after ACS irrespective of sex. Reduction of total cardiovascular events was greater at higher baseline lipoprotein(a). [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Women with type 2 diabetes and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented across multiple GLP-1RA cardiovascular outcome trials. • GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly reduced MACE in both males and females with type 2 diabetes, among Asians and Whites, and in Asia and Europe. • There was no statistical difference in the reduction of MACE by GLP-1RAs among Blacks and Hispanics. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been pivotal in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in the reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Notably, large cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) demonstrate significant disparities in inclusion, based on sex, race, ethnicity, and geographical regions. We examined the impact of GLP-1RA on MACE in patients with or without T2DM, based on sex, race, ethnicity, and geography. A literature search for placebo controlled randomized controlled trials on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted. Thorough data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, focusing on key outcome, and ensuring a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to calculate log odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 8 CVOTs comprising 71,616 patients were included. Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs significantly reduced MACE in both sexes (females: logOR -0.19, (95% CI, -0.28 to -0.10), p < 0.01) versus (males: logOR -0.17, (95% CI, -0.23 to -0.10), p < 0.01), (p interaction NS), and among Asians (logOR -34 (95% CI, -0.53 to -0.15), p < 0.01), and Whites (logOR -17 (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.09), p < 0.01), with no difference in MACE among Blacks and Hispanics. Odds of MACE were also reduced in Asia (logOR -31 (95% CI, -0.50 to -0.11), p < 0.01), and Europe (logOR -27 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.13), p < 0.01), but there was no statistical difference in MACE in North America and Latin America. Significant reductions in MACE with GLP-1RA treatment were demonstrated between both sexes and across certain ethnicities and certain geographical regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Iron deficiency and heart failure frequently co-occur, sparking clinical research into the role of iron repletion in this condition over the last 20 years. Although early nonrandomized studies and subsequent moderate-sized randomized controlled trials showed an improvement in symptoms and functional metrics with the use of intravenous iron, 3 recent larger trials powered to detect a difference in hard cardiovascular outcomes failed to meet their primary endpoints. Additionally, there are potential concerns related to side effects from intravenous iron, both in the short and long term. This review discusses the basics of iron biology and regulation, the diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency and the clinical evidence for intravenous iron in heart failure, safety concerns, and alternative therapies. We also make practical suggestions for the management of patients with iron deficiency and heart failure and outline key areas in need of future research. [Display omitted] • Iron deficiency and heart failure frequently occur concurrently and are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. • Early trials of intravenous iron repletion in patients with heart failure found improvements in symptoms and functional capacity, but subsequent large trials failed to confirm objective consistent benefit. • Side effects of and alternatives to intravenous iron repletion warrant careful consideration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context Next to a large body of epidemiological observational studies showing that the Mediterranean diet (MD) is an important lifestyle determinant of cardiovascular risk, there is less relevant evidence from well-conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard cardiovascular outcomes. Objective The objective of the study was to identify the most effective dietary intervention for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Data Sources A systematic approach following PRISMA network meta-analyses reporting guidelines was applied to a search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase) without language restrictions, supplemented by scanning through bibliographies of studies and meetings' abstract material. Inclusion criteria were RCTs conducted in an adult population, investigating the effects of different type of diets or dietary patterns on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes of interest. Data Extraction Data extraction for each study was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Data Analysis A frequentist network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted. Death from any cardiovascular cause was defined as the primary outcome. A total of 17 trials incorporating 83 280 participants were included in the systematic review. Twelve articles (n = 80 550 participants) contributed to the network meta-analysis for the primary outcome. When compared with the control diet, only the MD showed a reduction in cardiovascular deaths (risk ratio = 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.82). Additionally, MD was the sole dietary strategy that decreased the risk of major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, angina, and all-cause mortality. Conclusions MD may play a protective role against cardiovascular disease and death for primary and also secondary prevention. Systematic Review Registration Center for Open Science, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5KX83 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The study aims to provide comprehensive evidence for the selection of agents in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with cardiovascular risk and summarize the lasted evidence for the cardiovascular effects of sodium glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and results: Several online databases were searched. All studies that explored the cardiovascular effects of SGLT2i or glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP1‐RA) were screened and reviewed. A total of 38 studies were included. Compared with GLP1‐RA, the use of SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death [risk ratio (RR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44–0.58], hospitalization of heart failure (HHF) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74–0.80), death from any cause (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60–0.68), and myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76–0.87). However, SGLT2i significantly increased the risk of stroke (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.17). Compared with the control group, SGLT2i treatment reduced the risk of cardiovascular death by 14% (RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79–0.94), HHF by 25%, and death from any cause by 9% in patients with HF, regardless of diabetes status. Conclusions: SGLT2i is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death, HHF, death from any cause, and MI in patients with T2DM compared with GLP1‐RA. In addition, SGLT2i brought more benefits with respect to the effects of cardiovascular death, HHF, and death from any cause in patients with HF, regardless of diabetes status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last few years, given the increase in the incidence and prevalence of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), it became crucial to develop guidelines for the optimal preventive and treatment strategies for individuals facing these coexisting conditions. In patients aged over 65, HF hospitalization stands out as the predominant reason for hospital admissions, with their prognosis being associated with the presence or absence of T2DM. Historically, certain classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone), raised concerns due to an observed increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality. In response to these concerns, regulatory agencies started requiring CV outcome trials for all novel antidiabetic agents [i.e., dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)] with the aim to assess the CV safety of these drugs beyond glycemic control. This narrative review aims to address the current knowledge about the impact of glucose-lowering agents used in T2DM on HF prevention, prognosis, and outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Tirzepatide, a novel dual agonist of glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), has demonstrated greater magnitude of weight loss compared to semaglutide in a phase 3 clinical trial. However, the effect of tirzepatide on incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in individuals with overweight and obesity, and the effect on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with pre-existing T2D, remains unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of anonymised electronic medical records using the TriNetX network (TriNetX LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA) a global federated database. The data used in this study was collected on 5th June 2024. Two cohorts of individuals were generated: 1) without pre-existing T2D and, 2) with T2D. We adopted an active comparator new user design on new initiations of either tirzepatide or semaglutide therapy. Analysis began from the index event which was defined as individuals on respective therapy for 6 months only. Analysis of outcomes was conducted off-drug, in individuals without a pre-existing history of the disease of interest. Individuals were followed up for 12 months post the index event. Primary outcome for cohort 1 was incidence of T2D, and for cohort 2 was composite: all-cause mortality, cerebral infarction, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure. Secondary outcomes for cohort 1 were change in HbA1c and body weight and for cohort 2: incidence of micro- and macrovascular complications, suicidal ideation and/or attempt, and all-cause mortality. We propensity score matched (1:1) for potential confounders: baseline demographics, socioeconomic circumstances, HbA1c, weight, relevant co-morbidities, and anti-obesity, hypoglycaemic and cardioprotective agents. Findings: The study population without T2D consisted of 13,846 individuals, equally split between tirzepatide and semaglutide users. Tirzepatide was associated with both lower risk for incident T2D (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92, p

Background: Hypertension is an important contributor to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in breast cancer (BC) survivors; however, research on blood pressure (BP) and CVD outcomes in BC survivors is limited. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to better characterize the association between BP and CVD in a large, longitudinal cohort of BC patients. Methods: Women with invasive BC diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were matched 1:5 to women without BC. Patient data were obtained from electronic health records. Multivariable Cox regression and penalized spline models were used to explore the linear and nonlinear relationship of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on CVD outcomes. Results: BC cases (n = 12,713) and controls (n = 55,886) had median follow-up of 9.6 years (IQR: 5.0-11.9 years). Women with BC had a mean age of 60.6 years; 64.8% were non-Hispanic White. For ischemic heart disease (IHD), every 10 mmHg increase in SBP and DBP was associated with 1.23 (95% CI: 1.14-1.33) and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.98-1.24) risk, respectively, in women with BC. For stroke, every 10 mmHg increase in SBP and DBP was associated with a 1.45 (95% CI: 1.34-1.58) and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.68-2.18) risk, respectively. A U-shaped relationship was observed between heart failure/cardiomyopathy and BP. The associations between BP and risk of IHD, stroke, and any primary CVD were not statistically different comparing women with BC to controls, but risks varied by BC status for heart failure/cardiomyopathy (P for interaction = 0.01). Conclusions: Women with and without BC showed similar risks for IHD, stroke, and any primary CVD suggesting similar BP targets should be pursued regardless of BC survivorship status.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials are the gold standard for generating clinical practice evidence, but follow-up and outcome ascertainment are resource-intensive. Electronic health record (EHR) data from routine care can be a cost-effective means of follow-up, but concordance with trial-ascertained outcomes is less well-studied. METHODS: We linked EHR and trial data for participants of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), a randomized trial comparing intensive and standard blood pressure targets. Among participants with available EHR data concurrent to trial-ascertained outcomes, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for EHR-recorded cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, using the gold standard of SPRINT-adjudicated outcomes (myocardial infarction (MI)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure, stroke, and composite CVD events). We additionally compared the incidence of non-CVD adverse events (hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, bradycardia, and hypotension) in trial versus EHR data. RESULTS: 2468 SPRINT participants were included (mean age 68 (SD 9) years; 26% female). EHR data demonstrated ≥80% sensitivity and specificity, and ≥ 99% negative predictive value for MI/ACS, heart failure, stroke, and composite CVD events. Positive predictive value ranged from 26% (95% CI; 16%, 38%) for heart failure to 52% (95% CI; 37%, 67%) for MI/ACS. EHR data uniformly identified more non-CVD adverse events and higher incidence rates compared with trial ascertainment. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a role for EHR data collection in clinical trials, particularly for capturing laboratory-based adverse events. EHR data may be an efficient source for CVD outcome ascertainment, though there is clear benefit from adjudication to avoid false positives.

Abstract Background Cancer patients with diabetes are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases due to common risk factors and well-documented drug-associated cardiotoxicity. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with diabetes, but their effects on cancer patients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with concomitant diabetes and cancer. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing cardiovascular outcomes between cancer patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2 inhibitors and those not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 29, 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were heart failure hospitalization, and adverse events. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity and explore the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on mitigating cardiotoxicity. Results Nine cohort studies involving 82,654 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68, P

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF). Determining the type of HF experienced by AKI survivors (heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF or HFrEF) could suggest potential mechanisms underlying the association and opportunities for improving post-AKI care. Methods In this retrospective study of adults within the Vanderbilt University health system with a diagnosis of HF, we tested whether AKI events in the two years preceding incident HF associated more with HFpEF or HFrEF while controlling for known predictors. HF outcomes were defined by administrative codes and classified as HFpEF or HFrEF by echocardiogram data. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the effects of AKI on the odds of incident HFpEF versus HFrEF. Results AKI (all stages) trended towards a preferential association with HFpEF in adjusted analyses (adjusted OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 – 1.01). Stage 1 AKI was associated with higher odds of HFpEF that was statistically significant (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 – 0.88), whereas stages 2–3 AKI showed a trend toward HFrEF that did not reach statistical significance (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.76 – 1.63). Conclusions AKI as a binary outcome trended towards a preferential association with HFpEF. Stage 1 AKI was associated with higher odds of HFpEF, whereas stage 2–3 trended towards an association with HFrEF that did not meet statistical significance. Different mechanisms may predominate in incident HF following mild versus more severe AKI. Close follow-up with particular attention to volume status and cardiac function after discharge is warranted after even mild AKI.