Search

Background: This was a single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial of Bavarian Nordic (BN)-Brachyury vaccine plus radiotherapy (RT) designed to determine the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of the combination in chordoma., Methods: A total of 29 adult patients with advanced chordoma were treated with two subcutaneous priming vaccine doses of modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN)-Brachyury and one vaccine dose of fowlpox virus (FPV)-Brachyury before RT. After RT, booster vaccinations were given with FPV-Brachyury every 4 weeks for 4 doses, then every 12 weeks (week 110). A minimum RT dose of >8 Gy in one fraction for each target was required. Response was evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (mRECIST), where only radiated lesions were considered targets, and by standard RECIST 1.1 in a subset of patients., Results: Two of 26 evaluable patients experienced durable partial response (PR) (ORR of 7.7%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-20.8]) by mRECIST 1.1. A total of 21 patients (80.8%; 90% CI, 65.4-90.3) had stable disease, and three patients (11.5%; 90% CI, 4.7-25.6) had progressive disease as best response per mRECIST 1.1. Median PFS was not reached during the study., Conclusions: This trial confirms the safety of BN-Brachyury and RT. Although the study did not meet the predefined study goal of four responses in 29 patients, we did observe two PRs and a PFS of greater than 2 years. For a vaccine-based study in chordoma, an ultra-rare disease where response rates are low, a randomized study or novel trial designs may be required to confirm activity., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

In this issue, Gainor and colleagues report on the immunogenicity of personalized neoantigen-encoding mRNA vaccines that elicit measurable polyfunctional CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses in patients whose tumors have been resected. Reactivity is substantiated to 20% to 30% of the predicted MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes in four patients with NSCLC postsurgically treated with the vaccine alone and in 12 patients with melanoma treated with their individualized vaccines plus pembrolizumab in the context of a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03313778). See related article by Gainor et al., p. 2209., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Afamitresgene autoleucel (TECELRA ® ), a genetically modified human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-restricted autologous melanoma-associated antigen 4 (MAGE-A4)-directed T cell immunotherapy, is being developed by Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, for the treatment of solid tumours expressing the MAGE-A4 antigen. In August 2024, afamitresgene autoleucel was approved in the USA under accelerated approval for the treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic synovial sarcoma who have received prior chemotherapy, are HLA-A*02:01P, -A*02:02P, -A*02:03P or -A*02:06P positive and whose tumour expresses the MAGE-A4 antigen as determined by FDA-approved or cleared companion diagnostic devices. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of afamitresgene autoleucel leading to this first approval for the treatment of advanced synovial sarcoma., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Over the past few decades, research on cancer immunotherapy has firmly established immune cells as key players in effective cancer treatment. Peptide vaccines directly targeting immune cells have demonstrated immense potential due to their specificity and applicability. However, developing peptide vaccines to generate tumor-reactive T cells remains challenging, primarily due to suboptimal immunogenicity and overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). In this review, we discuss various elements of effective peptide vaccines, including antigen selection, peptide epitope optimization, vaccine adjuvants, and the combination of multiple immunotherapies, in addition to recent advances in tumor neoantigens as well as epitopes bound by non-classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, to increase the understanding of cancer peptide vaccines and provide multiple references for the design of subsequent T cell-based peptide vaccines., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

GBM is the most common, aggressive, and intracranial primary brain tumor; it originates from the glial progenitor cells, has poor overall survival (OS), and has limited treatment options. In this decade, GBM immunotherapy is in trend and preferred over several conventional therapies, due to their better patient survival outcome. This review explores the clinical trials of several immunotherapeutic approaches (immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), CAR T-cell therapy, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy) with their efficacy and safety. Despite significant progress, several challenges (viz., immunosuppressive microenvironment, heterogeneity, and blood-brain barrier (BBB)) were experienced that hamper their immunotherapeutic potential. Furthermore, these challenges were clinically studied to be resolved by multiple combinatorial approaches, discussed in the later part of the review. Thus, this review suggests the clinical use and potential of immunotherapy in GBM and provides the holistic recent knowledge and future perspectives., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that there is no competing and conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) remains a formidable clinical hurdle owing to its high aggressiveness and scant therapeutic options. Nonetheless, the evolving landscape of immunotherapeutic strategies opens up promising avenues for tackling this hurdle. This review discusses the advancing immunotherapy for TNBC, accentuating personalized interventions due to tumor microenvironment (TME) diversity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold pivotal significance, both as single-agent therapies and when administered alongside cytotoxic agents. Moreover, the concurrent inhibition of multiple immune checkpoints represents a potent approach to augment the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Synergistic effects have been observed when ICIs are combined with targeted treatments like PARP inhibitors, anti-angiogenics, and ADCs (antibody-drug conjugates). Emerging tactics include tumor vaccines, cellular immunotherapy, and oncolytic viruses, leveraging the immune system's ability for selective malignant cell destruction. This review offers an in-depth examination of the diverse landscape of immunotherapy development for TNBC, furnishing meticulous insights into various advancements within this field. In addition, immunotherapeutic interventions offer hope for TNBC, needing further research for optimization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Local radiotherapy (RT) exerts immunostimulatory effects by inducing immunogenic cell death. However, it remains unknown whether in vitro-irradiated tumor cells can elicit anti-tumor responses and enhance the efficacy of local RT and immune checkpoint inhibitors when injected in vivo., Methods and Materials: We tested the "in vitro-irradiated cancer vaccine (ICV)", wherein tumor cells killed by varying doses of irradiation and their supernatants are intravenously injected. We examined the efficacy of combining local RT (24 Gy in three fractions), PD-L1 blockade, and the ICV in a murine breast cancer model. The immune cell profiles were analyzed via flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. The cytokine levels were measured by multiplex immunoassays., Results: The ICV significantly increased the effector memory phenotype and interferon-γ production capacity in splenic CD8 + T cells. The in vitro-irradiated products contained immune response-related molecules. When combined with local RT and PD-L1 blockade, the ICV significantly delayed the growth of irradiated and non-irradiated tumors. The triple combination therapy increased the proportions of CD8 + T cells and effector memory CD8 + T cells while decreasing the proportion of CTLA-4 + exhausted CD8 + T cells within tumor microenvironment. Additionally, plasma level of interferon-γ and proliferation of effector T cells in the spleen and tumor-draining lymph nodes were significantly increased by the triple combination therapy., Conclusions: The ICV enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of local RT and PD-L1 blockade by augmenting anti-tumor immune responses. Our findings suggest a therapeutic potential of in vitro-irradiation products of tumor cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Se Yup Lee has the patent related to the work in this study. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Recent advances in tumor immunology and molecular drug development have ushered in a new era of cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy has shown promising results for several types of tumors, such as advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancers, and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Similarly, efforts have been made to develop immunotherapies such as adoptive T-cell transplantation, peptide vaccines, and dendritic cell vaccines, specifically for gastrointestinal tumors. However, before the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy did not work as well as expected. In this article, we review immunotherapy, focusing on cancer vaccines for gastrointestinal tumors, which generally target eliciting tumor-specific CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). We also review various vaccine therapies and describe the relationship between vaccines and adjuvants. Finally, we discuss prospects for the combination of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Malignant tumors, characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, are a leading global health challenge, responsible for over 9.7 million deaths in 2022, with new cases expected to rise to 35 million annually by 2050. Immunotherapy is preferred to other cancer therapies, offering precise targeting of malignant cells while simultaneously strengthening the immune system's complex responses. Advances in this novel field of science have been closely linked to a deeper knowledge of tumor biology, particularly the intricate interplay between tumor cells, the immune system, and the tumor microenvironment (TME), which are central to cancer progression and immune evasion. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of the molecular mechanisms that govern these interactions, emphasizing their critical role in the development of effective immunotherapeutic products. We critically evaluate the current immunotherapy approaches, including cancer vaccines, adoptive T cell therapies, and cytokine-based treatments, highlighting their efficacy and safety. We also explore the latest advancements in combination therapies, which synergistically integrate multiple immunotherapeutic strategies to overcome resistance and enhance therapeutic outcomes. This review offers key insights into the future of cancer immunotherapy with a focus on advancing more effective and personalized treatment strategies., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Angus Nnamdi Oli et al.)

A lot of hope for high-risk cancers is being pinned on immunotherapy but the evidence in children is lacking due to the rarity and limited efficacy of single-agent approaches. Here, we aim to assess the effectiveness of multimodal therapy comprising a personalized dendritic cell (DC) vaccine in children with relapsed and/or high-risk solid tumors using the N-of-1 approach in real-world scenario. A total of 160 evaluable events occurred in 48 patients during the 4-year follow-up. Overall survival of the cohort was 7.03 years. Disease control after vaccination was achieved in 53.8% patients. Comparative survival analysis showed the beneficial effect of DC vaccine beyond 2 years from initial diagnosis (HR = 0.53, P = .048) or in patients with disease control (HR = 0.16, P = .00053). A trend for synergistic effect with metronomic cyclophosphamide and/or vinblastine was indicated (HR = 0.60 P = .225). A strong synergistic effect was found for immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) after priming with the DC vaccine (HR = 0.40, P = .0047). In conclusion, the personalized DC vaccine was an effective component in the multimodal individualized treatment. Personalized DC vaccine was effective in less burdened or more indolent diseases with a favorable safety profile and synergized with metronomic and/or immunomodulating agents., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Despite the transformative impact of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, challenges such as low response rates persist. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway, a crucial element of innate immunity, emerges as a strategic target to overcome these limitations. Understanding its multifaceted functions in cancer, including antigen presentation and response to DNA damage, provides valuable insights. STING agonists, categorized into cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) and non-CDNs, exhibit promising safety and efficacy profiles. Innovative delivery systems, including antibody-drug conjugates, nanocarriers, and exosome-based therapies, address challenges associated with systemic administration and enhance targeted tumor delivery. Personalized vaccines, such as DT-Exo-STING, showcase the adaptability of STING agonists for individualized treatment. These advancements not only offer new prospects for combination therapies but also pave the way for overcoming resistance mechanisms. This review focuses on the potential of targeting STING pathway to enhance cancer immunotherapy. The integration of STING agonists into cancer immunotherapy holds promise for more effective, personalized, and successful approaches against malignancies, presenting a beacon of hope for the future of cancer treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Xu and Xiong.)

Compared to other types of tumor vaccines, RNA vaccines have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional vaccine therapy due to their high efficiency, rapid development capability, and potential for low-cost manufacturing and safe drug delivery. RNA vaccines mainly include mRNA, circular RNA (circRNA), and Self-amplifying mRNA(SAM). Different RNA vaccine platforms for different tumors have shown encouraging results in animal and human models. This review comprehensively describes the advances and applications of RNA vaccines in antitumor therapy. Future directions for extending this promising vaccine platform to a wide range of therapeutic uses are also discussed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Recent breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapies have emphasized the importance of harnessing the immune system for treating cancer. Vaccines, which have traditionally been used to promote protective immunity against pathogens, are now being explored as a method to target cancer neoantigens. Over the past few years, extensive preclinical research and more than a hundred clinical trials have been dedicated to investigating various approaches to neoantigen discovery and vaccine formulations, encouraging development of personalized medicine. Nucleic acids (DNA and mRNA) have become particularly promising platform for the development of these cancer immunotherapies. This shift towards nucleic acid-based personalized vaccines has been facilitated by advancements in molecular techniques for identifying neoantigens, antigen prediction methodologies, and the development of new vaccine platforms. Generating these personalized vaccines involves a comprehensive pipeline that includes sequencing of patient tumor samples, data analysis for antigen prediction, and tailored vaccine manufacturing. In this review, we will discuss the various shared and personalized antigens used for cancer vaccine development and introduce strategies for identifying neoantigens through the characterization of gene mutation, transcription, translation and post translational modifications associated with oncogenesis. In addition, we will focus on the most up-to-date nucleic acid vaccine platforms, discuss the limitations of cancer vaccines as well as provide potential solutions, and raise key clinical and technical considerations in vaccine development., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: We aimed to develop a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of a novel Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) peptide-pulsed dendritic cell (WT1-DC) vaccine and multiagent chemotherapy and to investigate the safety, clinical outcomes, and WT1-specific immune responses of patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-PDAC) who received this treatment., Methods: Patients with UR-PDAC with stage III disease (locally advanced (LA-PDAC; n=6)), stage IV disease (metastatic (M-PDAC; n=3)), or recurrent disease after surgery (n=1) were enrolled in this phase I study. The patients received one cycle of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine alone followed by 15 doses of the WT1-DC vaccine independent of chemotherapy. The novel WT1 peptide cocktail was composed of a multifunctional helper peptide specific for major histocompatibility complex class II, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01, or HLA-A*02:06 and a killer peptide specific for HLA-A*24:02., Results: The chemoimmunotherapy regimen was well tolerated. In the nine patients for whom a prognostic analysis was feasible, the clinical outcomes of long-term WT1 peptide-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (WT1-DTH)-positive patients (n=4) were significantly superior to those of short-term WT1-DTH-positive patients (n=5). During chemoimmunotherapy, eight patients were deemed eligible for conversion surgery and underwent R0 resection (four patients with LA-PDAC, one patient with M-PDAC, and one recurrence) or R1 resection (one patient with M-PDAC), and one patient with LA-PDAC was determined to be unresectable. Long-term WT1-DTH positivity was observed in three of the four patients with R0-resected LA-PDAC. These three patients exhibited notable infiltration of T cells and programmed cell death protein-1+ cells within the pancreatic tumor microenvironment (TME). All patients with long-term WT1-DTH positivity were alive for at least 4.5 years after starting therapy. In patients with long-term WT1-DTH positivity, the percentage of WT1-specific circulating CD4+ or CD8+ T cells that produced IFN-γ or TNF-α was significantly greater than that in patients with short-term WT1-DTH positivity after two vaccinations. Moreover, after 12 vaccinations, the percentages of both circulating regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells were significantly lower in patients with long-term WT1-DTH-positive PDAC than in short-term WT1-DTH-positive patients., Conclusions: Potent activation of WT1-specific immune responses through a combination chemoimmunotherapy regimen including the WT1-DC vaccine in patients with UR-PDAC may modulate the TME and enable conversion surgery, resulting in clinical benefits (Online supplemental file 1)., Trial Registration Number: jRCTc030190195., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Monocytes comprise subsets of classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes with distinct anti- or pro-tumor effects in breast cancer (BC). They are modulated by estrogen, and can contribute to BC control by endocrine therapy in preclinical models., Methods: To elucidate whether changes in monocyte subsets are associated with treatment and response, we investigated peripheral blood samples of 73 postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive BC, who received aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without the mucin-1 vaccine tecemotide in the ABCSG34 trial. Blood was retrieved at baseline, midterm and end of therapy, and was analyzed for the distribution and ER expression of monocyte subsets by flow cytometry., Results: When 40 healthy, age-matched women were compared with BC patients before treatment start, ER levels of monocytes did not differ, yet patients presented with a higher frequency of classical and fewer non-classical monocytes. Endocrine therapy triggered a significant increase in ER levels in all monocyte subsets, without affecting subset distribution. Vaccination had no overall impact on subset frequency and ER expression. Yet, a shift from intermediate to classical monocytes during therapy correlated with changes in plasma cytokines and chemokines and was significantly associated with low residual cancer burden in vaccinated patients. Without tecemotide, baseline ER levels in classical monocytes were significantly higher in women with good response to endocrine therapy., Conclusions: This study identified classical monocytes to be associated with ER positive BC and with patient response to neoadjuvant endocrine treatment and cancer vaccination., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumors, presenting significant challenges for treatment due to their invasive nature and localization in critical brain regions. Standard treatment includes surgical resection followed by radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). Recent advances in immunotherapy, including the use of mRNA vaccines, offer promising alternatives. This review focuses on the emerging use of mRNA vaccines for GBM treatment. We summarize recent advancements, evaluate current obstacles, and discuss notable successes in this field. Our analysis highlights that while mRNA vaccines have shown potential, their use in GBM treatment is still experimental. Ongoing research and clinical trials are essential to fully understand their therapeutic potential. Future developments in mRNA vaccine technology and insights into GBM-specific immune responses may lead to more targeted and effective treatments. Despite the promise, further research is crucial to validate and optimize the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in combating GBM., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies are an important treatment for patients with advanced cancers; however, only a subset of patients with certain types of cancer achieve durable remission. Cancer vaccines are an attractive strategy to boost patient immune responses, but less is known about whether and how immunization can induce long-term tumor immune reprogramming and arrest cancer progression. We developed a clinically relevant genetic cancer mouse model in which hepatocytes sporadically undergo oncogenic transformation. We compared how tumor-specific CD8 T cells (TST) differentiated in mice with early sporadic lesions as compared with late lesions and tested how immunotherapeutic strategies, including vaccination and ICB, impact TST function and liver cancer progression., Methods: Mice with a germline floxed allele of the SV40 large T antigen (TAG) undergo spontaneous recombination and activation of the TAG oncogene, leading to rare early cancerous TAG-expressing lesions that inevitably progress to established liver cancer. We assessed the immunophenotype (CD44, PD1, TCF1, and TOX expression) and function (TNFα and IFNγ cytokine production) of tumor/TAG-specific CD8 T cells in mice with early and late liver lesions by flow cytometry. We vaccinated mice, either alone or in combination with ICB, to test whether these immunotherapeutic interventions could stop liver cancer progression and improve survival., Results: In mice with early lesions, a subset of TST were PD1 + TCF1 + TOX - and could produce IFNγ while TST present in mice with late liver cancers were PD1 + TCF1 lo/- TOX + and unable to make effector cytokines. Strikingly, vaccination with attenuated TAG epitope-expressing Listeria monocytogenes (LM TAG ) blocked liver cancer development and led to a population of TST that were PD1-heterogeneous, TCF1 + TOX - and polyfunctional cytokine producers. Vaccine-elicited TCF1+TST could self-renew and differentiate, establishing them as progenitor TST. In contrast, ICB administration did not slow cancer progression or improve LM TAG vaccine efficacy., Conclusion: Vaccination, but not ICB, generated a population of functional progenitor TST and halted cancer progression in a clinically relevant model of sporadic liver cancer. In patients with early cancers or at high risk of cancer recurrence, immunization may be the most effective strategy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Therapeutic tumor vaccines have emerged as a compelling avenue for treating patients afflicted with advanced prostate cancer (PCa), particularly those experiencing biochemical relapse or ineligible for surgical intervention. This study serves to consolidate recent research findings on therapeutic vaccines targeting prostate tumors while delineating prevalent challenges within vaccine research and development., Methods: We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, up to August 31, 2024, using keywords such as 'vaccine', 'prostate cancer', 'immunotherapy', and others. We reviewed studies on various therapeutic vaccines, including dendritic cell-based, antigen, nucleic acid, and tumor cell vaccines., Results: Studies consistently showed that therapeutic vaccines, notably DC vaccines, had favorable safety profiles with few adverse effects. These vaccines, with varied antigenic formulations, demonstrated strong clinical outcomes, as indicated by metrics such as PSA response rates (9.5%-58%), extended PSA doubling times (52.9%-89.7%), overall survival durations (17.7-33.8 months), two-year mortality rates (0%-12.5%), biochemical relapse rates (42%-73%), and antigen-specific immune responses (33.3%-71.4% in responsive groups)., Conclusion: While clinical data for tumor vaccines have illuminated robust evidence of tumoricidal activity, the processes of their formulation and deployment are riddled with complexities. Combining vaccines with other therapies may enhance outcomes, and future research should focus on early interventions and deciphering the immune system's role in oncogenesis., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Advances in cancer immunotherapy have transformed cancer care and realized unprecedented responses in many patients. The growing arsenal of novel therapeutics - including immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), adoptive T cell therapies (ACTs), and cancer vaccines - reflects the success of cancer immunotherapy. The therapeutic benefits of these treatment modalities are generally attributed to the enhanced quantity and quality of antitumor CD8 + T cell responses. Nevertheless, CD4 + T cells are now recognized to play key roles in both the priming and effector phases of the antitumor immune response. In addition to providing T cell help through co-stimulation and cytokine production, CD4 + T cells can also possess cytotoxicity either directly on MHC class II-expressing tumor cells or to other cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). The presence of specific populations of CD4 + T cells, and their intrinsic plasticity, within the TME can represent an important determinant of clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. Understanding how the antitumor functions of specific CD4 + T cell types are induced while limiting their protumorigenic attributes will enable more successful immunotherapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests L.F. received research funding from Abbvie, Bavarian Nordic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dendreon, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Roche/Genentech, and Parker Institute; served as a consultant to Abbvie, Actym, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Atreca, Bioatla, Bolt, Bristol Myer Squibb, Crescendo, Daiichi Sankyo, Immunogenesis, Innovent, Merck, NGMBio, Nutcracker, RAPT, Senti, Sutro, and Roche/Genentech; and has ownership interests in Actym, Atreca, Bioatla, Bolt, Immunogenesis, Nutcracker, RAPT, and Senti, unrelated to this review., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Glioma, the most common primary malignant tumor in the central nervous system (CNS), lacks effective treatments, and >60% of cases are glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form. Despite advances in immunotherapy, GBM remains highly resistant. Approaches that target tumor antigens expedite the development of immunotherapies, including personalized tumor-specific vaccines, patient-specific target selection, dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) and T cell receptor (TCR) T cells. Recent studies show promising results in treating GBM and lower-grade glioma (LGG), fostering hope for future immunotherapy. This review discusses tumor vaccines against glioma, preclinical models in immunological research, and the role of CD4 + T cells in vaccine-induced antitumor immunity. We also summarize clinical approaches, challenges, and future research for creating more effective vaccines., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Personalized neoantigen vaccines have achieved major advancements in recent years, with studies in melanoma leading progress in the field. Early clinical trials have demonstrated their feasibility, safety, immunogenicity, and potential efficacy. Advances in sequencing technologies and neoantigen prediction algorithms have substantively improved the identification and prioritization of neoantigens. Innovative delivery platforms now support the rapid and flexible production of vaccines. Several ongoing efforts in the field are aimed at improving the integration of large datasets, refining the training of prediction models, and ensuring the functional validation of vaccine immunogenicity., Competing Interests: Disclosure C.J. Wu. holds equity in BioNTech, receives research funding from Pharmacyclics, United States, and is on the advisory boards of Repertoire and Aethon. P.A. Ott.: Advisory Role: Alexion, Array, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celldex, CytomX, Genentech, Merck, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, TRM Oncology, Evaxion, Immunetune, Servier, MyNeo, Phio. Grants to institution: Armo Biosciences, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celldex, CytomX, Genentech, Merck, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: S-588410, a cancer peptide vaccine (CPV), comprises five HLA-A*24:02-restricted peptides from five cancer-testis antigens. In a phase 2 study, S-588410 was well-tolerated and exhibited antitumor efficacy in patients with urothelial cancer. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, immune response, and safety of S-588410 in patients with completely resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)., Methods: This phase 3 study involved patients with HLA-A*24:02-positive and lymph node metastasis-positive ESCC who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative resection. After randomization, patients were administered S-588410 and placebo (both emulsified with Montanide™ ISA 51VG) subcutaneously. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) induction, and safety. Statistical significance was tested using the one-sided weighted log-rank test with the Fleming-Harrington class of weights., Results: A total of 276 patients were randomized (N = 138/group). The median RFS was 84.3 and 84.1 weeks in the S-588410 and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.8156), whereas the median OS was 236.3 weeks and not reached, respectively (P = 0.6533). CTL induction was observed in 132/134 (98.5%) patients who received S-588410 within 12 weeks. Injection site reactions (137/140 patients [97.9%]) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events in the S-588410 group. Prolonged survival was observed in S-588410-treated patients with upper thoracic ESCC, grade 3 injection-site reactions, or high CTL intensity., Conclusions: S-588410 induced immune response and had acceptable safety but failed to reach the primary endpoint. A high CTL induction rate and intensity may be critical for prolonging survival during future CPV development., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To determine if nutritional status effects response to immunotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on gynecologic cancer patients who received immunotherapy at a single institution between 2015 and 2022. Immunotherapy included checkpoint inhibitors and tumor vaccines. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated from serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte count. PNI values were determined at the beginning of treatment for each patient and assessed for their association with immunotherapy response. Disease control response (DCR) as an outcome of immunotherapy was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease., Results: One hundred and ninety-eight patients received immunotherapy (IT) between 2015 and 2022. The gynecological cancers treated were uterine (38%), cervix (32%), ovarian (25%), and vulvar or vaginal (4%) cancers. The mean PNI for responders was higher than the non-responder group (p < 0.05). The AUC value for PNI as a predictor of response was 49. A PNI value of 49 was 43% sensitive and 85% specific for predicting a DCR. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, after adjusting for ECOG score and the number of prior chemotherapy lines, severe malnutrition was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.85, p = 0.08) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.82, p < 0.001). Patients with PNI < 49 were at a higher risk of IT failure (HR = 2.24, p = 0.0001) and subsequent death (HR = 2.84, p = 9 × 10 -5 )., Conclusions: PNI can be a prognostic marker to predict response rates of patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immunotherapy. Additional studies needed to understand the mechanistic role of malnutrition in immunotherapy response., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Gliomas are the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumors worldwide, with glioblastoma (GBM) being the most common and aggressive type. The standard therapy for GBM has remained unchanged for nearly two decades, with no significant improvement in survival outcomes. Despite several barriers such as the tumor microenvironment (TME) and blood-brain barrier, immunotherapies bring new hope for the treatment of GBM. To better understand the development and progress of immunotherapies in GBM, we made this scientometric analysis of this field. A total of 3753 documents were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection, with publication years ranging from 1999 to 2022. The Web of Science platform, CiteSpace, and VOS viewer were used to conduct the scientometric analysis. The results of scientometric analysis showed that this field has recently become a popular topic of interest. The United States had the most publications among 89 countries or regions. Keyword analysis indicated significant areas in the field of immunotherapies for GBM, especially TME, immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs), chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, vaccines, and oncolytic viruses (OVs). Overall, we hope that this scientometric analysis can provide insights for researchers and promote the development of this field., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A monster called cancer is still one of the most challenging human problems and one of the leading causes of death in the world. Different types of treatment methods are used for cancer therapy; however, there are challenges such as high cost and harmful side effects in using these methods. Recent years have witnessed a surge in the development of therapeutic peptides for a wide range of diseases, notably cancer. Peptides are preferred over antibiotics, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer due to a number of aspects, including flexibility, easy modification, low immunogenicity, and inexpensive cost of production. The use of therapeutic peptides in cancer treatment is a novel and intriguing strategy. These peptides provide excellent prospects for targeted drug delivery because of their high selectivity, specificity, small dimensions, good biocompatibility, and simplicity of modification. Target specificity and minimal toxicity are benefits of therapeutic peptides. Additionally, peptides can be used to design antigens or adjuvants for vaccine development. Here, types of therapeutic peptides for cancer therapy will be discussed, such as peptide-based cancer vaccines and tumor-targeting peptides (TTP) and cell-penetrating peptides (CPP)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Gliomas are one of the most aggressive types of brain tumors and are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, conventional treatments for gliomas such as surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have limited effectiveness, and new approaches are needed to improve patient outcomes. mRNA-based vaccines represent a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, including gliomas. Recent advances in immunotherapy using mRNA-based dendritic cell vaccines have shown great potential in preclinical and clinical trials. Dendritic cells are professional antigen-presenting cells that play a crucial role in initiating and regulating immune responses. In this review, we summarize the current progress of mRNA-based vaccines for gliomas, with a focus on recent advances in dendritic cell-based mRNA vaccines. We also discuss the feasibility and safety of mRNA-based clinical applications for gliomas., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No conflict., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Melanoma remains one of the most common cancers diagnosed in the United States, yet there have been substantial advancements in the treatment of resectable disease. Adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) have now become standard of care for resectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma. In this article, the authors discuss recent scientific developments pertinent to the treatment of resectable melanoma including ICB, targeted therapy with BRAF/MEKi, oncolytic viruses, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, and cancer vaccines., Competing Interests: Disclosure G.M. Boland has sponsored research agreements through her institution with: Olink Proteomics, Teiko Bio, InterVenn Biosciences, Palleon Pharmaceuticals. She served on advisory boards for: Iovance, Merck, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, and Ankyra Therapeutics. She consults for: Merck, InterVenn Biosciences, Iovance, and Ankyra Therapeutics. She holds equity in Ankyra Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapy has shown promising therapeutic effects in hematological malignancies and certain solid tumors and has emerged as a critical and highly potential treatment modality for cancer. However, prostate cancer falls under the category of immune-resistant cold tumors, for which immunotherapy exhibits limited efficacy in patients with solid tumors. Thus, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer to facilitate immune system activation and overcome immune suppression to advance immunotherapy for prostate cancer. In this review, we discuss the immunosuppressive microenvironment of prostate cancer, which is characterized by the presence of few tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, abundant immunosuppressive cells, low immunogenicity, and a noninflammatory phenotype, which significantly influences the efficacy of immunotherapy for prostate cancer. Immunotherapy is mainly achieved by activating the host immune system and overcoming immunosuppression. In this regard, we summarize the therapeutic advances in immune checkpoint blockade, immunogenic cell death, reversal of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, tumor vaccines, immune adjuvants, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and overcoming penetration barriers in prostate cancer, with the aim of providing novel research insights and approaches to enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy for prostate cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is overexpressed on >90% of high-grade epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). Targeting FRα with antibody-drug conjugates has proven utility in the platinum-resistant setting. It is also a potential therapeutic target for immuno-oncologic agents, such as peptide vaccines that work primarily via adaptive and humoral immunity. We tested the hypothesis that FRα peptide immunization could improve outcomes in patients with EOC following response to platinum-based therapy., Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TPIV200 (a multi-epitope FRα peptide vaccine admixed with GM-CSF) versus GM-CSF alone in 120 women who did not have disease progression after at least 4 cycles of first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were vaccinated intradermally once every 4 weeks up to 6 times, followed by a boosting period of 6 vaccinations at 12-week intervals. Primary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and progression free survival (PFS)., Results: At study termination with a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range 1.2-28.4 months), 68 of 119 intention-to-treat patients had disease progression (55% in TPIV200 + GM-CSF arm and 59% in GM-CSF alone arm). The median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 8.3-16.6 months) with no significant difference between the treatment groups (10.9 months with TPIV200 + GM-CSF versus 11.1 months with GM-CSF, HR, 0.85; upper 90% CI 1.17]. No patient experienced a ≥ grade 3 drug-related adverse event., Conclusion: TPIV200 was well tolerated but was not associated with improved PFS. Additional studies are required to uncover potential synergies using multiepitope vaccines targeting FRα. Trial Registration NLM/NCBI Registry, NCT02978222, https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT02978222., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest KK is listed as a coinventor on a patent entitled ‘Immunity to folate receptors’, which is owned by the Mayo Clinic and was previously licensed to Marker Therapeutics. KK reports receiving commercial research support from Marker Therapeutics. REO reports institutional research grants from ArsenalBio, AstraZeneca/Merck, Atara Biotherapeutics/Bayer, Genentech, Genmab, GSK, Gynecologic Oncology Group Foundation, Juno Therapeutics, Kite/Gilead, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lyell Therapeutics, Marker Therapeutics, OnCusp Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sellas Life Sciences, Stemcentrx, Syndax, TapImmune, and TCR2 Therapeutics; participating in advisory boards with Bayer, Carina Biotech, Immunogen, Miltenyi, Loxo, Regeneron, R-Pharm, Seattle Genetics, and Tesaro/GSK; personal fees from GOG Foundation; travel fees from Hitech Health. RMW reports grants or funding from Anixa Biosciences, Merck, OnTarget; consulting, DSMB, or advisory fees from Eisai, Sonnet Biotherapeutics, Genentech, Abbvie, Shattuck Labs, Merck, GSK/Tesaro, Legend Biotech, Novocure, Clovis, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Mersana, Seagen; travel support from Eisai, Tapimmune/Marker Therapeutics; speakers bureau fees from GSK, CurioScience, Onclive; stock from Ovation Diagnostics. MSB is listed as a coinventor on pending patents entitled, “Combinations of Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccines” and “Checkpoint Inhibitors and Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccines and Uses Thereof;” reports institutional research support from Alkermes, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Marker Therapeutics, Merck, nFerence, Pharmacyclics, Regeneron, Sorrento, TILT Biotherapeutics, Transgene, and Viewpoint Molecular Therapeutics; and is has served as a consultant/SAB member for Marker Therapeutics, Sorrento Therapeutics, TILT Biotherapeutics, and Viewpoint Molecular Targeting., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study explored patients and providers' perspectives on therapeutic vaccines for cervical cancer and assessed barriers and facilitators., Methods: Qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with patients who had cervical dysplasia, or a past or current cervical cancer diagnosis and providers who provided care to patients with cervical abnormalities or cervical cancer. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis in NVivo., Results: A total of 28 in-depth interviews were conducted with patients (N = 15) and providers (N = 13). Participants in both groups expressed enthusiasm for the prospect of a therapeutic vaccine for cervical cancer and were encouraged by less invasive treatment opportunities. Perceived patient barriers included concerns about side effects, eligibility criteria, costs, transportation, and logistical obstacles. Providers echoed these concerns, highlighted additional structural barriers such as racism and limited availability of culturally sensitive educational aids, and underscored the need for provider training on this topic., Conclusion: Our results reinforce the need for future multi-level interventions discussing vaccine efficacy, durability, and safety, as well as addressing factors such as awareness, knowledge, and beliefs., Practice Implications: Our findings can contribute to the development of provider and patient-centered tools that promote therapeutic vaccine acceptance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Anna Giuliano reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: board membership and consulting or advisory. Dr. Giuliano’s institution has received funds to support HPV-related research. No other authors have conflicts of interest to report related to this paper. All authors attest that they meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Tumor neoantigens possess specific immunogenicity and personalized therapeutic vaccines based on neoantigens which have shown promising results in some clinical trials, with broad application prospects. However, the field is developing rapidly and there are currently few relevant review articles. Summarizing and analyzing the status of global personalized neoantigen vaccine clinical trials will provide important data for all stakeholders in drug development. Based on the Trialtrove database, a retrospective analysis was conducted using trial quantity as a key indicator for neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy anti-PD-1/PD-L1 clinical trials initiated before the end of 2022. The time trend of newly initiated trials was investigated. The sponsor type, host country, treatment mode, combination strategy, tested drugs, and targeted cancer types of these trials were summarized. As of December 2022, a total of 199 trials were included in the analysis. Among these studies, Phase I studies were the most numerous (119, 59.8%), and Phase I studies have been the predominant study type since 2015. Peptide vaccines were the largest neoantigen vaccines type, accounting for 64.8% of all clinical trials. Based on peptide delivery platforms, the proportion of trials was highest for the DC system (32, 16.1%), followed by LNP (11, 5.5%), LPX (11, 5.5%), and viruses (7, 3.5%). Most vaccines were applied in trials as a monotherapy (133/199, 66.8%), meanwhile combining immunotherapeutic drugs was the most common form for combination therapy. In terms of indications, the largest number of trials involved three or more unspecified solid tumors (50/199, 25.1%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (24/199, 12.1%) and pancreatic cancer (15/199, 7.5%). The clinical development of personalized neoantigen cancer vaccines is still in the early stage. A clear shift in delivery systems from peptides to DC and liposomal platforms, with the largest number of studies in Asia, collectively marks a new era in the field. The adjuvant or maintenance therapy, and the combination treatment with ICIs are becoming the important clinical development orientation. As research on tumor-immune interactions intensifies, the design, development, and application of neoantigen vaccines are bound to develop rapidly, which will bring a new revolution in the future cancer treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The incidence of lung cancer continues to grow globally, contributing to an ever-increasing load on healthcare systems. Emerging evidence has indicated lowered efficacy of conventional treatment strategies, such as chemotherapy, surgical interventions and radiotherapy, prompting the need for exploring alternative interventions. A growing focus on immunotherapy and the development of personalized medicine has paved the way for vaccine-based delivery in lung cancer. With various prominent targets such as CD8 + T cells and PD-L1, immune-targeted, anti-cancer vaccines have been evaluated in both, pre-clinical and clinical settings, to improve therapeutic outcomes. However, there are a number of challenges that must be addressed, including the scalability of such delivery systems, heterogeneity of lung cancers, and long-term safety as well as efficacy. In addition to this, natural compounds, in combination with immunotherapy, have gained considerable research interest in recent times. This makes it necessary to explore their role in synergism with immune-targeted agents. The authors of this review aim to offer an overview of recent advances in our understanding of lung cancer pathogenesis, detection and management strategies, and the emergence of immunotherapy with a special focus on vaccine delivery. This finding is supported with evidence from testing in non-human and human models, showcasing promising results. Prospects for phytotherapy have also been discussed, in order to combat some pitfalls and limitations. Finally, the future perspectives of vaccine usage in lung cancer management have also been discussed, to offer a holistic perspective to readers, and to prompt further research in the domain., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of noncoding RNAs that have emerged as pivotal players in gene regulation. Our understanding of circRNAs has greatly expanded over the last decade, with studies elucidating their biology and exploring their therapeutic applications. In this review, we provide an overview of the current understanding of circRNA biogenesis, outline their mechanisms of action in cancer, and assess their clinical potential as biomarkers. Furthermore, we discuss circRNAs as a potential therapeutic strategy, including recent advances in circRNA production and translation, along with proof-of-concept preclinical studies of cancer vaccines.

The advent of RNA therapy, particularly through the development of mRNA cancer vaccines, has ushered in a new era in the field of oncology. This article provides a concise overview of the key principles, recent advancements, and potential implications of mRNA cancer vaccines as a groundbreaking modality in cancer treatment. mRNA cancer vaccines represent a revolutionary approach to combatting cancer by leveraging the body's innate immune system. These vaccines are designed to deliver specific mRNA sequences encoding cancer-associated antigens, prompting the immune system to recognize and mount a targeted response against malignant cells. This personalized and adaptive nature of mRNA vaccines holds immense potential for addressing the heterogeneity of cancer and tailoring treatments to individual patients. Recent breakthroughs in the development of mRNA vaccines, exemplified by the success of COVID-19 vaccines, have accelerated their application in oncology. The mRNA platform's versatility allows for the rapid adaptation of vaccine candidates to various cancer types, presenting an agile and promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. Clinical trials of mRNA cancer vaccines have demonstrated encouraging results in terms of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Pioneering candidates, such as BioNTech's BNT111 and Moderna's mRNA-4157, have exhibited promising outcomes in targeting melanoma and solid tumors, respectively. These successes underscore the potential of mRNA vaccines to elicit robust and durable anti-cancer immune responses. While the field holds great promise, challenges such as manufacturing complexities and cost considerations need to be addressed for widespread adoption. The development of scalable and cost-effective manufacturing processes, along with ongoing clinical research, will be pivotal in realizing the full potential of mRNA cancer vaccines. Overall, mRNA cancer vaccines represent a cutting-edge therapeutic approach that holds the promise of transforming cancer treatment. As research progresses, addressing challenges and refining manufacturing processes will be crucial in advancing these vaccines from clinical trials to mainstream oncology practice, offering new hope for patients in the fight against cancer., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) represents the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. Only 20% of patients present surgically resectable and potentially curable tumors at diagnosis, while 80% are destined for poor survival and palliative chemotherapy. Accordingly, the advancement of innovative and effective therapeutic strategies represents a pivotal medical imperative. It has been demonstrated that targeting the immune system represents an effective approach against several solid tumors. The immunotherapy approach encompasses a range of strategies, including the administration of antibodies targeting checkpoint molecules (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs) to disrupt tumor suppression mechanisms and active immunization approaches that aim to stimulate the host's immune system. While vaccines have proved effective against infectious agents, vaccines for cancer remain an unfulfilled promise. Vaccine-based therapy targeting tumor antigens has the potential to be a highly effective strategy for initiating and maintaining T cell recognition, enhancing the immune response, and ultimately promoting cancer treatment success. In this review, we examined the most recent clinical trials that employed diverse vaccine types to stimulate PDA patients' immune systems, either independently or in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, ICIs, and monoclonal antibodies with the aim of ameliorating PDA patients' quality of life and extend their survival.

The increasing interest in bacteriophage technology has prompted its novel applications to treat different medical conditions, most interestingly cancer. Due to their high specificity, manipulability, nontoxicity, and nanosize nature, phages are promising carriers in targeted therapy and cancer immunotherapy. This approach is particularly timely, as current challenges in cancer research include damage to healthy cells, inefficiency in targeting, obstruction by biological barriers, and drug resistance. Some cancers are being kept at the forefront of phage research, such as colorectal cancer and HCC, while others like lymphoma, cervical cancer, and myeloma have not been retouched in a decade. Common mechanisms are immunogenic antigen display on phage coats and the use of phage as transporters to carry drugs, genes, and other molecules. To date, popular phage treatments being tested are gene therapy and phage-based vaccines using M13 and λ phage, with some vaccines having advanced to human clinical trials. The results from most of these studies have been promising, but limitations in phage-based therapies such as reticuloendothelial system clearance or diffusion inefficiency must be addressed. Before phage-based therapies for cancer can be successfully used in oncology practice, more in-depth research and support from local governments are required.

Purpose: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II study (HERIZON; NCT02795988) was conducted to evaluate the clinical and immunologic efficacy of HER-Vaxx (IMU-131), a B-cell, peptide-based vaccine targeting HER2 overexpressed in 6% to 30% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA)., Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 36) with GEA were treated with standard-of-care chemotherapy (n = 17) or HER-Vaxx plus chemotherapy (n = 19), using the recommended phase 2 dose for the vaccine. Overall survival (OS; primary endpoint), safety, progression-free survival (PFS), clinical response (secondary endpoints), and vaccine-induced HER2-specific antibody levels in serum and correlation with tumor response rates (exploratory endpoints) were investigated., Results: A 40% OS benefit [HR, 0.60; median OS, 13.9 months; 80% confidence interval (CI), 7.52-14.32] for patients treated with HER-Vaxx plus chemotherapy compared with OS of 8.31 months (80% CI, 6.01-9.59) in patients that received chemotherapy alone. A 20% PFS difference was obtained for the vaccination arm (HR, 0.80; 80% CI, 0.47, 1.38). No additional toxicity due to HER-Vaxx was observed. The vaccine-induced high levels of HER2-specific total IgG and IgG1 antibodies (P < 0.001 vs. controls) that significantly correlated with tumor reduction (IgG, P = 0.001; IgG1, P = 0.016), had a significant capacity in inhibiting phosphorylation of the intracellular HER2-signaling pathways, mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and decreased immunosuppressive FOXP3+ regulatory T cells., Conclusions: HER-Vaxx plus standard chemotherapy exhibits an excellent safety profile and improves OS. Furthermore, vaccine-induced immune response was significantly associated with reduced tumor size compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy. The presented vaccination approach may substitute for treatment with trastuzumab, upon unavailability or toxicity, based on further evidence of equivalent treatment efficacy., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Immunotherapies have shown limited responses in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recently, we reported that dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy induced T-cell responses against pancreatic cancer antigens. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of DC-based immunotherapy to prevent recurrence of disease., Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, single-arm, combined phase I/II trial. The primary end point was the 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. A 2-year RFS rate of ≥60% was defined as a clinically meaningful improvement. We included patients with pancreatic cancer after resection and completion of standard-of-care (SOC) treatment without recurrent disease on cross-sectional imaging. Patients were treated with autologous DCs pulsed with an allogeneic mesothelioma tumor cell lysate, comprising antigens also expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma., Results: Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis of the primary end point (47% male, 53% female). The median age was 62 years (IQR, 55-68). Twenty-eight patients (74%) received five DC vaccinations and completed the study protocol. Three patients (8%) received four vaccinations, and seven patients (16%) received three vaccinations. After a median follow-up of 25.5 months, 26 patients (68%) had not developed recurrence of disease. The estimated 2-year RFS was 64%. Vaccination led to the enrichment of circulating activated CD4+ T cells and the detection of treatment-induced immune responses in vitro. T-cell receptor-sequencing analyses of a resected solitary lung metastasis showed influx of vaccine-specific T cells., Conclusion: This study reached its primary end point of a 2-year RFS rate of ≥60% following pancreatectomy after SOC treatment and adjuvant DC-based immunotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. These results warrant a future randomized trial.

Despite treatment advances through immunotherapies, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, the overall prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor, underscoring the need for novel approaches that offer long-term clinical benefit. This review examined the literature on the subject over the past 20 years to provide an update on the evolving landscape of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy to treat NSCLC, highlighting the crucial role of dendritic cells (DCs) in immune response initiation and regulation. These cells encompass heterogeneous subsets like cDC1s, cDC2s, and pDCs, capable of shaping antigen presentation and influencing T cell activation through the balance between the Th1, Th2, and Th17 profiles and the activation of regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg). The intricate interaction between DC subsets and the high density of intratumoral mature DCs shapes tumor-specific immune responses and impacts therapeutic outcomes. DC-based immunotherapy shows promise in overcoming immune resistance in NSCLC treatment. This article review provides an update on key clinical trial results, forming the basis for future studies to characterize the role of different types of DCs in situ and in combination with different therapies, including DC vaccines., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Oliveira, Silva, Fernandes, Batah, Herrera, Cetlin and Fabro.)

Abstract: The immune revolution that swept the field of oncology in the mid-2010s with the advent of checkpoint inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in approaches toward adapting new cancer prevention modalities. Cancer vaccines have emerged from this era with astounding potential as a durable intervention to prevent cancers especially for patients with hereditary susceptibilities such as Lynch syndrome carriers. This review covers new insights in the immunoprevention landscape for patients living with Lynch syndrome including highlights ranging from clinical trials exploring the use of chemoprevention agents to boost immune cellularity to investigative studies using novel vaccine approaches to induce long-term antitumor immunity., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: E.V. had a consulting or advisory role with Janssen Research and Development, Recursion Pharma, Guardant Health, Rising Tide Foundation, and Nouscom, s.r.l. He has received research support from Janssen Research and Development. This work was supported by grants CA260761 and CA257375 (US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute) to E.V. For the remaining authors none were declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Significant strides have been made in identifying tumour-associated antigens over the past decade, revealing unique epitopes crucial for targeted cancer therapy. Among these, the New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NY-ESO-1) protein, a cancer/testis antigen, stands out. This protein is presented on the cell surface by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules and exhibits restricted expression in germline cells and various cancers, marking it as an immune-privileged site. Remarkably, NY-ESO-1 serves a dual role as both a tumour-associated antigen and its own adjuvant, implying a potential function as a damage-associated molecular pattern. It elicits strong humoural immune responses, with specific antibody frequencies significantly correlating with disease progression. These characteristics make NY-ESO-1 an appealing candidate for developing effective and specific immunotherapy, particularly for advanced stages of disease. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of NY-ESO-1 as an immunogenic tumour antigen. We then explore the diverse strategies for targeting NY-ESO-1, including cancer vaccination with peptides, proteins, DNA, mRNA, bacterial vectors, viral vectors, dendritic cells and artificial adjuvant vector cells, while considering the benefits and drawbacks of each strategy. Additionally, we offer an in-depth analysis of adoptive T-cell therapies, highlighting innovative techniques such as next-generation NY-ESO-1 T-cell products and the integration with lymph node-targeted vaccines to address challenges and enhance therapeutic efficacy. Overall, this comprehensive review sheds light on the evolving landscape of NY-ESO-1 targeting and its potential implications for cancer treatment, opening avenues for future tailored directions in NY-ESO-1-specific immunotherapy. HIGHLIGHTS: Endogenous immune response: NY-ESO-1 exhibited high immunogenicity, activating endogenous dendritic cells, T cells and B cells. NY-ESO-1-based cancer vaccines: NY-ESO-1 vaccines using protein/peptide, RNA/DNA, microbial vectors and artificial adjuvant vector cells have shown promise in enhancing immune responses against tumours. NY-ESO-1-specific T-cell receptor-engineered cells: NY-ESO-1-targeted T cells, along with ongoing innovations in engineered natural killer cells and other cell therapies, have improved the efficacy of immunotherapy., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shanghai Institute of Clinical Bioinformatics.)

Background: Gliomas, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are highly aggressive brain tumors that present significant challenges in oncology due to their rapid progression and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite advancements in treatment, the prognosis for patients with GBM remains poor, necessitating the exploration of novel therapeutic approaches. One such emerging strategy is the development of glioma vaccines, which aim to stimulate the immune system to target and destroy tumor cells., Aims: This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current landscape of glioma vaccine development, analyzing the types of vaccines under investigation, the outcomes of clinical trials, and the challenges and opportunities associated with their implementation. The goal is to highlight the potential of glioma vaccines in advancing more effective and personalized treatments for glioma patients., Materials and Methods: This narrative review systematically assessed the role of glioma vaccines by including full-text articles published between 2000 and 2024 in English. Databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using key terms like "glioma," "brain tumor," "glioblastoma," "vaccine," and "immunotherapy." The review incorporated both pre-clinical and clinical studies, including descriptive studies, animal-model studies, cohort studies, and observational studies. Exclusion criteria were applied to omit abstracts, case reports, posters, and non-peer-reviewed studies, ensuring the inclusion of high-quality evidence., Results: Clinical trials investigating various glioma vaccines, including peptide-based, DNA/RNA-based, whole-cell, and dendritic-cell vaccines, have shown promising results. These vaccines demonstrated potential in extending survival rates and managing adverse events in glioma patients. However, significant challenges remain, such as therapeutic resistance due to tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms. Moreover, the lack of standardized guidelines for evaluating vaccine responses and issues related to ethical considerations, regulatory hurdles, and vaccine acceptance among patients further complicate the implementation of glioma vaccines., Discussion: Addressing the challenges associated with glioma vaccines involves exploring combination therapies, targeted approaches, and personalized medicine. Combining vaccines with traditional therapies like radiotherapy or chemotherapy may enhance efficacy by boosting the immune system's ability to fight tumor cells. Personalized vaccines tailored to individual patient profiles present an opportunity for improved outcomes. Furthermore, global collaboration and equitable distribution are critical for ensuring access to glioma vaccines, especially in low- and middle-income countries with limited healthcare resources CONCLUSION: Glioma vaccines represent a promising avenue in the fight against gliomas, offering hope for improving patient outcomes in a disease that is notoriously difficult to treat. Despite the challenges, continued research and the development of innovative strategies, including combination therapies and personalized approaches, are essential for overcoming current barriers and transforming the treatment landscape for glioma patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cancer immunotherapy activates the host immune system against tumor cells and has the potential to lead to the development of innovative strategies for cancer treatment. Neoantigens are non-self-antigens produced by genetic mutations in tumor cells that induce a strong immune response against tumor cells without central immune tolerance. Along with advances in neoantigen analysis technology, the development of vaccines focusing on neoantigens is being accelerated. Whereas there are various platforms for neoantigen vaccines, combined immuno-therapies are being developed simultaneously with the clinical application of synthetic long peptides and mRNA and dendritic-cell (DC)-based vaccines. Personalized DC-based vaccines not only can load various antigens including neoantigens, but also have the potential to elicit a strong immune response in T cells as antigen-presenting cells. In this review, we describe the properties of neoantigens and the basic characteristics of DCs. We also discuss the clinical applications of neoantigen vaccines, focusing on personalized DC-based vaccines, as well as future research and development directions and challenges., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Neoantigen-based therapy is a promising approach that selectively activates the immune system of the host to recognize and eradicate cancer cells. Preliminary clinical trials have validated the feasibility, safety, and immunogenicity of personalized neoantigen-directed vaccines, enhancing their effectiveness and broad applicability in immunotherapy. While many ongoing oncological trials concentrate on neoantigens derived from mutations, these targets do not consistently provoke an immune response in all patients harboring the mutations. Additionally, tumors like ovarian cancer, which have a low tumor mutational burden (TMB), may be less amenable to mutation-based neoantigen therapies. Recent advancements in next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics have uncovered a rich source of neoantigens from non-canonical RNAs associated with transposable elements (TEs). Considering the substantial presence of TEs in the human genome and the proven immunogenicity of TE-derived neoantigens in various tumor types, this review investigates the latest findings on TE-derived neoantigens, examining their clinical implications, challenges, and unique advantages in enhancing tumor immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is the 8th most common cancer in the UK, with incidence increasing due to lifestyle factors such as tobacco and alcohol abuse. HNSCC is an immune-suppressive disease characterised by impaired cytokine secretion and dysregulation of immune infiltrate. As such, immunotherapy is a potential treatment option, with therapeutic cancer vaccination demonstrating the greatest potential. The success of cancer vaccination is dependent on informed antigen selection: an ideal antigen must be either tumour-specific or tumour-associated, as well as highly immunogenic. Stratification of the patient population for antigen expression and validated biomarkers are also vital. This review focuses on the latest developments in immunotherapy, specifically the development of therapeutic vaccines, and highlights successes, potential drawbacks and areas for future development. Immunotherapy approaches considered for HNSCC include monoclonal antibodies (mAb), Oncolytic viral (OV) therapies, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and cancer vaccines., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)