Search

The article present an interview with Mark Warren, author of "Willful Defiance: The Movement to Dismantle the School-to-Prison Pipeline," book. Topics include the concept of the school-to-prison pipeline; grassroots movements opposing it; the role of intergenerational transmission in organizing efforts; and highlighting the need for collaborative research and activism to address systemic inequalities and promote social justice.

• We analyse the impact of COVID-19 on Chinese transnational research networks in health. • We build a unique dataset comparing China and the U.S and COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 related research. • COVID-19 networks are smaller and less inter-connected, both in China and in the U.S. • Chinese COVID-19 networks attract a lower number of countries, in more volatile relations compared to non-COVID research. Research networks play pivotal roles in the creation and diffusion of knowledge. It is widely acknowledged that frontier research tends to cluster around transnational research networks (TRNs), which also represent strategic tools for nurturing innovation in R&D-intensive companies. Therefore, they are crucial for promoting the rapid development of the knowledge economy in underdeveloped countries. In this context, China's experience is particularly relevant because the country has invested heavily in knowledge production, which is arguably one of the most important structural changes at the global level in recent decades, with important implications for the division of labor and trade among countries. The country has been investing in order to become the scientific world leader, and in this transition, research collaboration, in particular with other countries, can become strategic. In this work, we analyze whether COVID-19 and related research have affected the shape of the network and the intensity of collaborations involving China in the field of health studies, comparing it to the case of the U.S. as the global leader in research (Fry et al., 2020). In particular, we wish to assess whether COVID-19-related research has pushed toward larger and more intensive collaborations internationally than before the pandemic or whether a tendency to closure has prevailed has prevailed. This also means understanding whether COVID-19, as a global phenomenon, has affected China in rising as an international research leader. To do so, we built an original dataset of international, coauthored publications involving China or the U.S. in selected health research fields. Our analysis first shows that COVID-19 research has assumed specific features distinct from other topics in the same research field, shaping research networks in a peculiar way for both China and the U.S. Second, for China, COVID-19 does not appear to have represented an opportunity to further climb up the international research ladder, as it has attracted a relatively low and more volatile number of collaborators from different countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the disruptions COVID-19 caused to normal research processes, including international collaboration, this study sought to understand scientists' experiences collaborating internationally during the pandemic on COVID-19-related research. Specifically, it explored US scientists' tie formation and reasons for international research collaboration with Chinese scientists. The study employed a sequential exploratory mixed methods design collecting interview and survey data from US scientists who co-published articles related to COVID-19 with Chinese scientists. The findings revealed the role of network mechanisms, such as transitivity, opportunity of contact, and homophily, in promoting relationship formation and maintenance. Moreover, they showed the greater role that bonding social capital played in helping scientists access valuable knowledge, skills, and resources to enhance their research potential. Lastly, they demonstrated how particularized trust based on prior interactions and experiences encouraged relationship formation and collaboration between US and Chinese scientists. Together, these results provide new insights in informing future policies and guidelines related to supporting international collaboration and, ultimately, shared pandemic challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article reports on research investigating the aspirations of pupils in primary schools located in low-socioeconomic areas in one English county. The research adopted a qualitative approach to explore aspirations, self-efficacy, opinions regarding the merits of investment in education, and notions of perceived future selves. The research also considered the expectations of parents and teachers providing insight into how they support children's aspirations and expose them to opportunities and ideas. The study utilised various trigger activities as a precursor to focus groups. The findings show a distinct gap between pupils' conception of their current selves and their future selves whereby there is uncertainty and insecurity about the appropriate steps needed to make informed choices and realise aspirations. Parents and extended family are the predominant idea source for aspirations and their assistance is recognised, above all, as important by pupils. Aspirations are also fashioned by pupils' gender-specific ideas about certain jobs and cultural exposure to the media. Pupils discern the importance of working hard and performing well at school. Most parents just want their child to be happy in the future and, as such, would support their child's career choices believing these could be achieved although believing qualifications are important, and the job market restricted. Teachers want their pupils to have options but identify barriers to achieving aspirations as worklessness in families, the locality of the school, low self-efficacy and unrealistic aspirations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper documents a case study examining collaborative transdisciplinary (TD) and interdisciplinary (ID) graduate programmes at the University of British Columbia (a large, public, research-intensive university in Canada) – serving as a model for other universities globally. TD and ID programmes in higher education can ultimately create a new generation of researchers who are capable of contending with complex problems by equipping them with a broad range of research competencies and expertise. This study used open-ended surveys and semi-structured focus groups and interviews to understand how students, faculty members, and programme coordinators experienced these programmes, focusing on specific competencies (e.g. values, knowledge, interpersonal skills). We then highlighted how programmes may be preparing students to engage in collaborative applied research (i.e., TD and ID) in real-world contexts. Our findings suggest that "breadth" programmes exposed students to a wide range of disciplinary perspectives, while "depth" programmes focused on a specific research problem in fewer disciplines. TD and ID co-supervision and thesis committee membership emerged as rich avenues for students to receive mentorship from faculty members. Lastly, respondents wanted more applied research and opportunities to connect with potential employers outside academia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many educators in immersion contexts support a policy of strict separation of languages in the classroom as the ideal model for second language acquisition and are reluctant to make connections between the dominant language, the target language and pupils' home languages. This can result in missed opportunities for drawing on pupils' entire linguistic repertoires to foster their learning The present study considers teachers' discourses surrounding the place and role of the dominant language (French), the target language (English) and home languages from the perspective of classroom teachers at one French primary school with a school-wide English immersion program participating in a collaborative research project. Since the program's inception in 2011, the one teacher/one language model has been adopted and approximately half the day is spent in each language. The analysis of the data comprising semi-structured interviews, filmed observations, stimulated video recall and focus group sessions revealed a shift in teachers' language awareness concerning the use of students' L1 as resources and their willingness to experiment with new pedagogies drawing on students' entire linguistic repertoires. The data highlighted challenges which emerged during the implementation of more flexible multilingual pedagogies as well as teachers' need for learning and long-term continued professional development. De nombreux professionnels de l'éducation enseignant en contextes scolaires d'immersion inscrivent leurs choix pédagogiques dans une politique de stricte séparation des langues comme modèle idéal pour l'acquisition d'une langue seconde. De fait, ils sont réticents à établir des liens entre la langue dominante, la langue cible et les langues d'origine des élèves. La présente étude examine les discours d'enseignants du primaire d'une école en France sur la place et le rôle de la langue dominante (le français), de la langue cible (l'anglais) et de la langue parlée à la maison. Ces enseignants sont en poste dans une école ayant un programme d'immersion en anglais. Depuis la création du programme en 2011, le modèle un enseignant/une langue domine et environ la moitié de la journée est consacrée à chaque langue. Depuis 2018, l'école participe à un projet de recherche collaborative. L'analyse des données, comprenant des entretiens semi-directifs, des observations filmées, des auto-confrontations et des sessions de focus groups, a révélé un changement dans la conscience linguistique des enseignants concernant l'utilisation de la L1 des élèves comme ressources. L'analyse montre également la volonté des enseignants d'expérimenter de nouvelles pédagogies faisant appel à l'ensemble des répertoires linguistiques des élèves. Lors de la mise en œuvre de pédagogies multilingues plus flexibles de nouveaux défis sont apparus, ainsi que le besoin des enseignants de bénéficier d'un accompagnement au développement professionnel à long terme. Many teachers working in bilingual classrooms and schools believe that the best model for learning the lesser spoken target language is one in which only one of the school languages is spoken at a time in the classroom. When this is the case, teachers miss opportunities to make connections between the languages of schooling as well as between the languages of schooling and the other languages spoken at home by the pupils and their families. In this study we looked at the teaching practices in a school where this was initially the case. We worked closely and collaboratively with the teaching staff to explore the different ways of drawing on the languages present in the school. We did this through the reading and discussing of scientific articles, by watching examples of classroom practices and through group discussions. The study showed that the teachers' awareness of the benefits of drawing on both of the languages of schooling increased. Some of the teachers also began to implement projects where both languages were used in the same classroom. The study also showed that implementing such pedagogies presented some challenges for the teachers and required more long-term professional support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significant collaborations with research partners in China are seen in many Western countries. With increasing US-China geopolitical tensions, governments, research institutions, and individuals in established scientific systems are increasingly required to address a proliferating array of risks and challenges associated with collaboration with China. Academic researchers are only beginning to describe how countries are responding to the ongoing need for global scientific collaboration amidst intensifying geopolitical competition. Several studies have examined the securitization of scientific connections with China in the USA, while others have documented developments in nations such as Australia, the UK, and Sweden. However, there is limited comparative research on approaches to international science amid geopolitical tensions. This paper bridges the gap, illuminating the key dimensions of variation in country-level responses by comparing the cases of Sweden and Australia. The questions we ask are as follows: Who responds to the challenges? By what means? And to what ends are responses directed? Swedish government have been largely passive, but Swedish funding agencies have developed "responsible internationalisation" guidelines that aim to induce proactive reflection by institutions and individual researchers. Australia's approach, by contrast, has centred on legislation, the exercise of ministerial powers, along with sector-wide enactment of expanded due diligence protocols. The comparison highlights key differences in the actors, methods and goals of responses to the intensifying geopolitics of scientific collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a data-driven framework for evaluating collaboration efficiency within scientific research teams. The framework introduces a team efficiency evaluation system consisting of 40 specific indicators, which are analyzed and modeled using statistical methods. The adaptive enhancement algorithm model achieves the highest accuracy, recall, and F1 values, with scores of 0.852, 0.530, and 0.620, respectively. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed data-driven research team collaboration model, offering theoretical support for enhancing the effectiveness of group collaboration. Moreover, the study is significant for further research on group collaboration in diverse fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing internationalization of Higher Education Institutions has facilitated universities from East Asian countries like Taiwan, Korea, and China to value university rankings more in enhancing their admissions and reputation. Especially when Taiwan and China are all considered belonging to Chinese social community, returnee doctorates are assumed to possess international experience that is theoretically helpful to improve their research productivity and university employers generally prefer foreign-trained doctorates. However, there is little research to prove that returnee doctorates are more productive than local doctorates because of more frequent international mobility. This research examines a University in Taiwan, a prominent academic research university, credible for its research productivity. From the perspective of bibliometrics, this study used the Scopus International Academic Database to identify publications, citations, and Field Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) as credible indicators of research productivity, controlling for personal background, doctoral training, international mobility, and research collaboration. We hope that the differences in research productivity between local and returnee doctorates can be measured more comprehensively and objectively. The results of this study found that there is a significant difference in the higher FWCI score of research publications between local and returnee doctorates, and further found that there is a significant positive relationship between local doctorates, published papers during doctoral studies, prestige of supervisors, and international and domestic research collaboration on research productivity. Those that identified international mobility in careers had a stronger impact on research productivity compared to those of the doctorate educating stage, and both international and domestic research collaboration were important for research productivity. The results based on empirical analysis broke the myths of returnee doctorate corresponding to high research productivity in this study, and can serve as a reference for faculty recruitment and research environment enhancement in research-oriented universities in Taiwan and other Asian countries. Policy implications are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this piece of research is to study productivity and scientific collaboration in the main Spanish sociology journals from a gender perspective. The authorship of 3171 documents published in these journals during the period 2001-2020 was analysed using bibliometric and social network analysis techniques. While there was an overwhelming male dominance at the start of the period, the results show a steady trend towards parity; however, this was only achieved during the 2016-2020 period, and not in all indicators. In conclusion, gender advances in sociology research have only partially come to fruition in Spain, but the scholarly monitoring system cannot be held accountable for this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There are no published examples of a global online research collaborative in andrology. We describe the development, profile and member characteristics of the first consortium of this type, the Global Andrology Forum (GAF). Materials and Methods: An online survey sent to all GAF members collected demographic information (sex, age, experience, academic title, degrees, country, specialty, profession). It also tapped data on members’ characteristics e.g., skills in research, software and statistics; preferred activities; time commitments; expected roles; and interest in participating in research, in GAF’s scientific activities and collaborative online research. The findings were analyzed and tabulated. We outline members’ demographic and professional characteristics and scientific achievements to date. A narrative approach outlined GAF’s structure and functioning. Results: A total of 418 out of 540 members completed the survey and were included in the analysis (77.4% response rate). The sample comprised mainly urologists (34.2%) and a third of the respondents had practiced for >15 years (33.3%). Up to 86.1% of the members expressed interest in being actively engaged in writing scientific articles. A third of the sample (37.1%) could dedicate 4 to 6 hours/week. Few respondents reported skills in statistics and artwork (2.6% and 1.9% respectively). Members were assigned to specific roles based on their expertise and experiences. Collaborative working ensured the timely completion of projects while maintaining quality. For outcomes, GAF published 29 original articles within one year of its creation, with authors from 48 countries spanning topics that included varicocele, sperm DNA damage, oxidative stress, semen analysis and male infertility, oocyte/embryo, and laboratory issues of assisted reproductive technique (ART) and male infertility evaluation. Conclusions: GAF is a successful global online andrology research model. A healthy number of scientific articles have been published. Given such effectiveness, adopting the GAF model could be useful for other disciplines that wish to create and coordinate successful international online research groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The year 2020 marked the 25th anniversary of the Barcelona Process, an initiative which is celebrated as the beginning of a quarter of a century of dialogue and cooperation between the EU and its South Mediterranean partners. This article offers the first systematic analysis of the scholarly debate about the EU's action in the Southern Mediterranean by using bibliometric data of studies from 1995 until 2020 from the Scopus database. The analysis reveals the following findings: first, regardless of the presence of several research networks, studies about Euro-Mediterranean relations remain mainly an individual enterprise. Second, after the Barcelona Process, the literature was marked by a creative synthesis between area studies and EU-wide trends leading to distinctive typologies of Euro-Mediterranean relations. Third, although there is a consensus among scholars about the EU's Eurocentric approach towards Euro-Mediterranean relations, a social network analysis of the literature shows that scientific cooperation remains extremely Eurocentric. Fourth, despite the important contribution of women in this field, the discipline suffers from a significant gender gap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• COSSI is an Australian collaborative network for vaccination social science. • Researchers, policy and program workers and advocates benefit from alignment. • The collaborative model has helped Australian researchers to generate global impact. • Other countries can learn from the COSSI model and experience for local action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Publication trends in prominent behavior-analytic journals developed in the United States of America have shown that most of its research has been produced by authors with North American affiliations. The geographic affiliation of authors who have contributed research to the Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis (MJBA), European Journal of Behavior Analysis (EJBA), and Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis (BJBA) – all of which are housed outside of the United States of America – are currently unknown. We examined articles published in these journals from their inception through 2020 to determine the geographic locations of authors’ listed affiliations. We found that 70% and 90% of publications in the MJBA and BJBA, respectively, were from researchers with Latin American affiliations. The EJBA had 58% and 42% of publications from researchers with North American and European affiliations, respectively. The articles were also analyzed to determine if they were co-authored by researchers from different geographic regions. The data show that 11, 6, and 3% of articles published in EJBA, MJBA, and BJBA, respectively, were cooperative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a critical review of literature on church interpreting, also called interpreting in church and sermon interpreting, and introduces the public Bibliography of Interpreting in Christian Settings. The review argues that this literature can be usefully organised into three separate approaches: publications aimed at practitioners, descriptive research, and prescriptive research. These approaches each presuppose a different relationship between interpreting and practice and between the researcher and the object of study and thus show distinct trajectories. Publications aimed at practitioners were developed as a tool for educating interpreters and later turned to empirical investigations. Descriptive research was developed from historical research on interpreting in Judaism and from two studies on the relationship between church interpreting and its contexts. Prescriptive research seeks to professionalise church interpreting, mostly through locating errors or challenges in interpreter output. This difference in research focus has led to a mix of methods and foci, from an autoethnography of interpreting to international surveys. It is argued that the separation of these approaches now impedes research progress. The article ends with a suggestion of how to synthesise these approaches, taking into account the social, spiritual, and personal nature of church interpreting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the collaborative effort to complete and publish Laura's book "Rhythmical Subjects" following her diagnosis with pancreatic cancer. Topics discussed include the editorial process after Laura's passing, the significance of her research on rhythm in nineteenth and twentieth-century intellectual and artistic culture, and the broader implications of her work for understanding interdisciplinary connections in the humanities.

The United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and, in particular, its Sustainable Development Goal no. 4, underline the relevance of quality education that translates into long‐term benefits for all learners. This article reports findings of a collaborative research study that piloted an inclusive practice index to investigate inclusion in schools. We applied a mixed‐methods design to identify potent features of inclusion, and developed an index that measured the extent to which inclusive practices were considered in schools. The index was administered in 168 schools and to 498 teachers. Using exploratory factor analysis, psychometric properties and potency of factors were determined. Our results revealed a two‐factor solution cumulatively accounting for 72% of variation. Based on our findings, we highlight the need for schools to be deliberate in processes that enhance application of inclusive practices. When applied with intention, this will foster accountability for inclusion in the delivery of meaningful inclusive education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we first (re)trace the presence and absence of mining, metals and extractionary practices, what we call MMEs, from environmental and sustainability curricular frameworks United Nations' Act Now Framework. Then, we critique the swelling markets, mentalities, and mastermindings used to develop and produce "clean" and "renewable" energy sources/solutions. As one of many examples, there is increasing skepticism among Indigenous communities that history may repeat itself as the quest for "clean" results in further displacement and violations of tribal sovereignty (Healy & Baker, 2021; Holzman & Waldman, 2022; Shah & Bloomer, 2018). Notwithstanding our (e.g., authors) academic positionalities in social studies education, one of our conclusions considers the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration between science and social studies on the issue of sustainability through MMEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the early twentieth century, with the development of Western scientific imperialism, Asia, South America, and Africa became sites for Western scientific exploration. Many paleontological specimens, including dinosaur bones, were discovered in China by foreign scientists and explorers and exported to museums in France, Sweden, and the United States. After the establishment of the Nationalist Government in Nanjing in 1927, anti-imperialist Chinese intellectuals attempted to prevent foreigners from exporting specimens unearthed on Chinese territory. In the summer of 1928, the fossils discovered in the Gobi Desert by the Central Asiatic Expedition of the American Museum of Natural History were detained in China. A series of negotiations ensued between Chinese and American diplomats and scientists over the issues of the ownership of fossils and the format of international scientific collaborations. By studying the interests and stakes for players in the different social worlds involved in the dispute, this essay explores the relations among science, diplomacy, and the politics of deep time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We construct scientific research cooperation networks in the field of public management to provide empirical support for exploring the trend in cooperation in the public administration domain. Based on the SSCI database, the co-authored papers in the field of public administration from 1921 to 2022 are selected as data sources. Ucient software is used to visualize the cooperation networks of countries, cities, institutions, and authors in public administration research, and to explore the spatial structure and driving factors of cooperation networks at different levels. The country-level cooperation in public administration research is closely related to geographical location and is affected by regional agreements to some extent. London and Washington are located at the center of the global public administration cooperation network, and the city-level cooperation network is affected by south-north differentiation and the east-west gap in global economic development and thus exhibits significant non-equilibrium. The institutions in the United Kingdom, America, and Canada are the main forces of international cooperation in the field of public administration and accordingly occupy a dominant position in cooperation networks. The authors' collaboration network in the public administration research shows strong centrality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

JUAMI, the joint undertaking for an African materials institute, is a project to build collaborations and materials research capabilities between PhD researchers in Africa, the United States, and the world. Focusing on researchactive universities in the East African countries of Kenya, Ethiopia, Tanzania and Uganda, the effort has run a series of schools focused on materials for sustainable energy and materials for sustainable development. These bring together early-career researchers from Africa, the US, and beyond, for two weeks in a close-knit environment. The program includes lectures on cuttingedge research from internationally renowned speakers, highly interactive tutorial lectures on the science behind the research, also from internationally known researchers, and hands-on practicals and team-building exercises that culminate in group proposals from self-formed student teams. The schools have benefited more than 300 early-career students and led to proposals that have received funding and have led to research collaborations and educational nonprofits. JUAMI continues and has an ongoing community of alumni who share resources and expertise, and is open to like-minded people who want to join and develop contacts and collaborations internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents a novel approach that synergizes community detection algorithms with various Graph Neural Network (GNN) models to bolster link prediction in scientific literature networks. By integrating the Louvain community detection algorithm into our GNN frameworks, we consistently enhanced the performance across all models tested. For example, integrating the Louvain model with the GAT model resulted in an AUC score increase from 0.777 to 0.823, exemplifying the typical improvements observed. Similar gains were noted when the Louvain model was paired with other GNN architectures, confirming the robustness and effectiveness of incorporating community-level insights. This consistent increase in performance—reflected in our extensive experimentation on bipartite graphs of scientific collaborations and citations—highlights the synergistic potential of combining community detection with GNNs to overcome common link prediction challenges such as scalability and resolution limits. Our findings advocate for the integration of community structures as a significant step forward in the predictive accuracy of network science models, offering a comprehensive understanding of scientific collaboration patterns through the lens of advanced machine learning techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The #MeToo movement raised global awareness about harassment in the workplace. Concerns were raised, however, that the movement may have unintendedly harmed women in academia by decreasing collaboration invitations from men in senior positions, who might be more reluctant to collaborate. Objective: To analyze whether collaborations between first author women and last author men decreased after the #MeToo movement. Design: Retrospective observational study. Participants: Names of first and last authors of 122,450 US review articles from the PubMed database published between 2014 and 2020. Main Measures: Change in the proportion of review articles with a first author woman and a last author man following the peak of the #MeToo movement in October 2017. Additionally, among review articles with a last author man, trends of women first authorship in the USA and Europe (control group) were compared. Key Results: We analyzed 122,450 review articles with first and last authors from US institutions. Of 85,015 articles by a man last author, 37.5% (31,902) had a woman first author. In contrast, when the last author was a woman, the first author was also a woman in 53.6% of articles (20,078) (p<0.001 for difference). Among review articles with a last author man, there was no change in the proportion of articles with a woman first author before versus after the peak of the #MeToo movement (e.g., p=0.13 for difference between the 12 months following October 2017 compared to the pre-#Me-too period). Among European institutions, of 72,036 articles by a man last author, 43.4% (31,294) had a woman first author, higher than the proportion observed in the USA. Trends in collaboration between first author women and last author men were similar in the USA and Europe after the peak of the #MeToo movement (p=0.65). Conclusions: The #MeToo movement was not associated with a reduction in the rate of scientific review article authorship collaborations between first author women and last author men in the life sciences. These findings, if generalizable, suggest it is possible to promote accountability for harassment in the workplace without limiting decreases in collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scientific publication is one of the main channels for disseminating research results and one of the most important means of determining the presence of women in scientific research. This article aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field, from a gender perspective, by analysing Journal of Information Science (2015–2020). To reach this goal, the research has been developed in several stages (data collection, gender authors' identification, validation of authorities, contact by email and analysis of results) to identify 326 contributions and 697 authors finally. Analysis patterns showed outcomes on gender (single and multiple authors), scientific collaboration, authorship time-course, authorship productivity as well as institutional and geographic affiliation. Some conclusions show that male and female authors are not equally represented in the journal, with a great difference in the case of collective authorship. Overall, there is a clear trend of single and multiple male authorship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Any research collaboration can potentially transform the participants' understandings and enhance their professional relationships with one another and with significant others. If this transformation is to eventuate, research collaborators need to exhibit mindfulness with regard to their multiple relationships, as well as to the intentions and effects of their collaborations.These requirements of transformative research collaborations align with, and build on, Macfarlane's (2017a) influential, six-element representation of research collaboration as a moral continuum, through the authors' rationale for adding a seventh element to this representation, centred on the ethically informed fusion of third space (Bhabha, 1994) and creative understanding (Bakhtin, 1986). The authors argue that this fusion enables researchers to move beyond the self-regarding and other-regarding binary underpinning Macfarlane's representation, and also to progress to a new collaboration dimension that is fundamentally democratic in character as well as creative and productive in its effects.The evidence for this argument derives from the first-named author's Doctor of Philosophy thesis (Veles, 2020), which investigated the cross-boundary third space collaboration of university actors, and for which the second-named author was a supervisor/adviser. The authors posit this particular research collaboration as transformative through its creative fusion of third space and creative understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemical Reviews, a leading scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society in the field of chemistry is going to complete its 100 years of journey. On that note, this study aims to conduct a scientometric analysis of the contributions made by the Indian chemists to that journal. The analysis is based on scientometric indicators such as the number of publications, citation count and authorship patterns to provide a comprehensive overview of Indian scientists' impact on the journal. The study reveals that India is among the top contributors to the journal, with a substantial increase in the number of publications over the past few years. Furthermore, Indian authors have published highly cited articles, indicating the high-quality research being conducted in the country. The analysis of authorship patterns shows that collaborations between Indian and foreign researchers are increasing, highlighting the importance of international collaboration in scientific research. A comprehensive content analysis explores the focus area transition of the published work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Power analysis currently dominates sample size determination for experiments, particularly in grant and ethics applications. Yet, this focus could paradoxically result in suboptimal study design because publication biases towards studies with the largest effects can lead to the overestimation of effect sizes. In this Essay, we propose a paradigm shift towards better study designs that focus less on statistical power. We also advocate for (pre)registration and obligatory reporting of all results (regardless of statistical significance), better facilitation of team science and multi-institutional collaboration that incorporates heterogenization, and the use of prospective and living meta-analyses to generate generalizable results. Such changes could make science more effective and, potentially, more equitable, helping to cultivate better collaborations. Statistical power analysis currently dominates experimental design. In this Essay, the authors argue that we should move away from the current focus on power analysis and instead encourage smaller scale studies and collaborative projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NTT Human Informatics Laboratories has been engaged in collaborative research with students from Kanagawa Prefectural Yokosuka Senior High School under the research theme of "Let's experience being sports analysts" since 2022 as part of its support for the school's Super Science High School program. This article introduces interviews with NTT researchers who have been involved in local-community-contribution activities aimed at nurturing young researchers along with the lead teacher from Kanagawa Prefectural Yokosuka Senior High School. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Equity-centred teacher education recognises the dual challenge of preparing teachers to support the learning of all students while encouraging future teachers to recognise and challenge societal systems reproducing inequity. The paper focuses on analysing Finnish student teachers' perceptions of teachers' skills related to diversity and equity. The data are drawn from written individual and group assignments completed during three master's level courses in home economics teacher education. A qualitative content analysis of students' assignments present student teachers' collaboratively produced understanding of teachers' diversity skills. Their self-assessment of both professional strengths and areas of development are evaluated against Paul Gorski's equity literacy framework. The findings are suggestive of a relatively strong cultural self-awareness and response-ability related to learner diversity. More attention should be given to unfolding structural inequities to enable future teachers to develop the equity literacy necessary to create and sustain equitable learning environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spatial proximity may facilitate scientific collaboration. We regress its impact within two German research institutions, defining collaboration strength and proximity by the number of joint publications and spatial distance between work places. The methodological focus lies on accounting for (i) the dependency structure in network data and (ii) excess zeros in the sparse target matrix. The former can be addressed by a quadratic assignment procedure (QAP), the second by a hurdle model. To offer a joint solution, we combine the methods to novel parametric and non-parametric hurdle-QAP models. The analysis reveals that proximity can facilitate collaboration, but significant effects get lost within building structures. Outcomes of this study may inform about how to target the promotion of interdisciplinary research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Collaborative research papers are widely acknowledged to be more impactful than single‐authored studies in higher education amidst subject area known to alter citation counts. While preceding studies have mostly recognised these two as the antecedents of research impact separately, it needs to be clarified whether the interaction of research area and type of collaboration causes any moderation. Comprehensive knowledge of differences in impact caused by a certain combination of type and area is important because, if citation impact is associated only with a particular combination, the impact‐based research stimulation programs without regard to combination consequences may be cost‐ineffective if not self‐destructing. This study investigates how research collaborations in academia impact the productivity and impact of university faculty. The focus is on the impact variation due to the type of academic collaboration (internal, domestic, international) and the research area. For the empirical test of this study, publicly open data from 1368 faculty in one of the leading Russian higher education institutions—HSE University. Results have two‐fold nature. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) researchers are more likely to collaborate with domestic co‐authors. This result accentuates the specifics of the academic traditions in the research areas highly recognised for having a long and successful history and worldwide impact on science. The collaborations built on international coauthorship are associated with higher publication visibility rates for researchers from emerging fields in Russia, like those in social sciences and humanities, whereas institutional collaborations are found to be positively related to the share of cited documents. This article sheds light on the differences in academic collaboration mechanisms influencing research productivity and impact in two distinct research areas. It invites revisiting policies stimulating collaborative activities in universities, demonstrating their potentially discrepant consequences. The study's substantial contribution also refers to the use of panel data on personal attributes, research productivity and impact, which is a rare case for research collaboration studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data science is inherently collaborative as individuals across fields and sectors use quantitative data to answer relevant questions. As a result, there is a growing body of research regarding how to teach interdisciplinary collaboration skills. However, much of the work evaluating methods of teaching statistics and data science collaboration relies primarily on self-reflection data. Additionally, prior research lacks detailed methods for assessing the quality of collaboration skills. In this case study, we present a method for teaching statistics and data science collaboration, a framework for identifying elements of effective collaboration, and a comparative case study to evaluate the collaboration skills of both a team of students and an experienced collaborator on two components of effective data science collaboration: structuring a collaboration meeting and communicating with a domain expert. Results show that the students could facilitate meetings and communicate comparably well to the experienced collaborator, but that the experienced collaborator was better able to facilitate meetings and communicate to develop strong relationships, an important element for high-quality and long-term collaboration. Further work is needed to generalize these findings to a larger population, but these results begin to inform the field regarding effective ways to teach specific data science collaboration skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scientific research on passion fruit has been conducted in several institutions worldwide, and it is of interest to the productive sector, the scientific community, and science and technology managers to learn about current scientific advances and opportunities through metric studies of bibliographic information. A survey of publications indexed in the Web of Science and the Agricultural Research Database— BDPA, in European Patent Office – Espacenet, and Embrapa’s technologies and projects were used as indicators to characterize research networks. This study analyzed the co-authorship and co-citation network of scientific production, the strength of connections among institutions, and a map of co-occurrence of keywords from 2001 to 2020. Brazil, the United States, Colombia, and France had the largest co-authorship networks for Passifloraceae. Brazilian institutions that are in a prominent position in the analysis of co-authorship networks and that produced the largest number of publications were Embrapa, University of São Paulo (USP), and State University of Campinas (Unicamp). The main themes studied were adsorption, antioxidant, clarification, evolution, flavonoid, flowering, growth, and somatic embryogenesis. Patents related to the use of passifloras were highest between 2015 and 2017 and were mainly focused on the production of food, beverages, cosmetics, and medicines. Brazil has relevant bibliographic production and technological development regarding passion fruit for the academic community and rural producers. These results integrated aspects of scientific activity that can help explore new research directions and explain the use and circulation of scientific production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This special issue draws from the AAA panel 'Entangling data while entangling disciplines: discussing the future of anthropological collaborations with data scientists'. It deals with experiences of anthropologists who have collaborated with data scientists. To render the panel truly interdisciplinary, the organizers of the AAA panel invited a data scientist as discussant, Katie Amato. Below her comments have been elaborated in the form of a dialogue with anthropologist Roberta Raffaetà. This afterword aims to sketch some paths of reflections about what data scientists think of collaborations with anthropologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the editors' introduction to a group of three articles on collaborative public history: history that is made with and by, as well as for, a range of public and community actors. We focus on collaboration with members of the public and community groups rather than institutions or people who are working in a professional capacity. In this introduction, we use Saima Nasar and Gavin Schaffer's notion of being 'alongside' to describe their positionality as academic 'co-travellers' with their collaborators. The models used here all involve academics working alongside their collaborators in physical and embodied ways, but being alongside also encompasses a political, emotional and empathetic standpoint that, as Nasar and Schaffer note, might involve letting go of a sense of academic critical distance. Being alongside involves working in ways that reject or try to push against hierarchies which often dominate such academic interactions. This way of thinking encapsulates an aspiration and a key question for all of us who are engaged in collaborative public history: how can we work alongside our collaborators in a way that approaches ethically the political, practical and emotional challenges of such work? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Throughout this article, we examine the potential pathways towards failure in public engagement projects as well as specific experiences of failure. Our aim is to identify some core reasons why attempts by historians to work with people beyond the campus contain risk and might fail. To do this, we focus on the types of relationships that are formed as a result of collaboration and emphasise the role of dialogue: of speaking and, more importantly, of listening. In writing this article, we therefore set out to explore the implications of sound and space for socially engaged public history. Throughout the article, we develop the idea of 'fraught spaces' as a way of recognising the feelings, especially of anxiety and insecurity, that all participants might experience as they enter what are sometimes complex relationships. We also suggest some practical steps to support collaborative research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Family historians are a large and often neglected group of historical researchers. They have a strongly articulated sense of their practice, and a well-developed set of methodologies and research apparatuses. They mostly work on their own, or in partnership with other family members, and are associated with public libraries, archives and local historical societies. They are a community who are situated outside the academy, often marginalised by the mainstream. They have been dismissed for their naiveté and amateurism and are ridiculed for seeking emotional connections with the past lives of their forebears. The research practice and interests of family historians are often defined as unscientific, uncritical, emotional and of little value to the academy or anyone else bar their own family group. We interrogate these assumptions here and show how family history is enabling a huge number of people to think historically and to produce distinctive forms of historical understanding that challenge academic monopoly of historical knowledge. The essay considers the working practices of family historians and elaborates some of the key ways that family history work provides models for socially engaged research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we summarise advancements in top-of-hole sensing achieved within the Deep Exploration Technologies Cooperative Research Centre (DET CRC). It was demonstrated that the drill fines, which were previously discarded, show high potential to act as a representative sample media of the lithologies intersected by the drill hole and can be successfully used for analysis in real time. The Lab-at-RigVR (LARVR) system was developed for prospecting rigs (diamond drilling in the first instance and coil tube drilling in the future) and encompasses sample capture, sample preparation and presentation to sensors. In the initial setup of the LAR platform, there are two sensors, a portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) and a portable X-ray diffraction, capable of delivering chemical and mineralogical data in near real time. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy was also explored as a potential additional sensor for future versions of the LAR system, as it can yield information on elemental composition including essential light elements not currently measured by air-based pXRF detectors (e.g. Li, Na and Mg at low levels) or other elements problematic by pXRF (e.g. Au). The LAR system implements X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis from which mineralogical data (mineral identification and most importantly mineral quantification) must be obtained in near real time. The existing challenge with XRD is that any data processing and especially data interpretation with available software packages requires some expertise in the field and background in crystallography and is time-consuming. Hence, SwiftMinVR, the world's first algorithm for automated processing of XRD data, was developed. It provides mineral identification and quantification and performs all calculations and processing independent from a user. SwiftMin returns a result in seconds and is able to batch process hundreds of XRD patterns in a matter of minutes. The above means, that SwiftMin is a technology that allows processing of large amount of XRD data quickly, saving time, costs and labour. The overall concept and vision developed within the DET CRC in top-of-hole sensing by coupling chemical and mineralogical analyses of drilling materials is to provide an end-to-end solution that supports rapid decision making by a geologist, at the time-scale of drilling the hole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scientific experts from different disciplines often struggle to mesh their specialized perspectives into the shared mindset that is needed to address difficult and persistent environmental, ecological, and societal problems. Many traditional graduate programs provide excellent research and technical skill training. However, these programs often do not teach a systematic way to learn team skills, nor do they offer a protocol for identifying and tackling increasingly integrated interdisciplinary (among disciplines) and transdisciplinary (among researchers and stakeholders) questions. As a result, professionals trained in traditional graduate programs (e.g. current graduate students and employed practitioners) may not have all of the collaborative skills needed to advance solutions to difficult scientific problems. In the present article, we illustrate a tractable, widely implementable structured process called RISE that accelerates the development of these missing skills. The RISE process (Route to Identifying, learning, and practicing interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary team Skills to address difficult Environmental problems) can be used by diverse teams as a tool for research, professional interactions, or training. RISE helps professionals with different expertise learn from each other by repeatedly asking team-developed questions that are tested using an interactive quantitative tool (e.g. agent-based models, machine learning, case studies) applied to a shared problem framework and data set. Outputs from the quantitative tool are then discussed and interpreted as a team, considering all team members' perspectives, disciplines, and expertise. After this synthesis, RISE is repeated with new questions that the team jointly identified in earlier data interpretation discussions. As a result, individual perspectives, originally informed by disciplinary training, are complemented by a shared understanding of team function and elevated interdisciplinary knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the artistic journey of Swiss painter Margrit Fischer-Hotz, inspired by the scientific achievements and research of her late husband, Walter E. Fischer, a renowned physicist. Topics discussed include Fischer-Hotz's interdisciplinary approach merging art and science, her influences from international scientific collaborations, and her commitment to expressing scientific concepts in her artwork. It also delves into her interdisciplinary approach, incorporating elements from medical microbiology, quantum physics, and the universe into her art, reflecting her vision of a holistic abstraction.

Political science and Science Studies both use the words "politics" and "science," yet each applies such different meanings as to nearly appear incommensurable. Here, I explain to political scientists the various uses of these words by Science Studies practitioners and how they could relate to those used by political science. The paper shows that only one of these meanings of the word "science" (out of four possible meanings) distinguishes it in a radical way from "politics" (which may take on six different meanings). Once those meanings have been defined, I propose that a more fruitful collaboration between Science Studies and political science could be developed based on the method of "following issues," rather than delimiting distinct domains for science and politics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scientific collaboration helps to promote the dissemination of knowledge and is essential in breeding innovation. Collaboration network analysis is a useful tool to study researchers' collaborations. In this work, we collect papers published between 2001 and 2018 in 43 statistical journals and investigate the collaborative trends and patterns. We find that more and more researchers take part in statistical research, and cooperation among them is strengthening. We further construct an attributed collaboration network and extract its core. Community detection is conducted on the core network by using the edge cross‐validation (ECV) method and the attributed network clustering algorithm (ANCA). In particular, we extend the ANCA to deal with networks having both categorical and continuous attributes. Influential researchers are identified in each community. Furthermore, two kinds of homophily are revealed in our collaboration network: research topic homophily and spatial proximity homophily. Based on the homophily and transitivity, we can make recommendations for researchers. Finally, we compare ANCA with the other three methods and confirm that the combination of nodal attributes and network structure improves the quality of community detection. Our studies show the features of the collaboration among statisticians and present a new perspective to explore researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An editorial is presented in Educational Action Research, focusing on the shared concern among reflective action researchers about achieving greater integrity in their practices, research, and interactions. Topics include commemorating Olav Eikeland's legacy, questioning assumptions in Participatory Action Research, exploring alternative conceptualizations of participation, and addressing challenges in reporting uncomfortable truths in action research.

Based on models resulting from the merging of validated kinetic schemes, four reaction mechanisms were developed to describe the combustion of biodiesel-surrogate/ethanol blends in an HCCI engine. The proposed models were then compared to experimental data issued from a modified cooperative fuel research (CFR) engine which can be considered as an HCCI engine. The kinetic scheme displaying the best predictive capabilities, in conjunction with the single-zone HCCI code from the chemkin library, was used to investigate effects of ethanol enrichment and the variation of some important parameters, such as inlet temperature, relative air/fuel ratio and compression ratio, on the combustion and performance characteristics of the investigated HCCI engine. The blended fuels were formed by incrementally adding 10% of ethanol to the neat biodiesel mixture. The inlet temperature ranged from 320 to 420 K with a step of 20 K, whereas air/fuel and compression ratios were varied from 2 to 5 with a step of 0.5, and from 9 to 14 with a step equal to 1, respectively. The obtained data indicated that ethanol effects on the starting of combustion, combustion duration and indicated mean effective pressure were dependent on intake temperature, air/fuel and compression ratios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research teams must collaborate with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to identify effective and inclusive responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies. Collaborating remotely requires telecommunication and other technologies. We designed and evaluated a digital "Toolkit for Remote Inclusive Research" to provide research teams with evidence-informed strategies to make remote research accessible to and inclusive of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. First, we completed a rapid scoping review to identify technology used by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities on collaborative research teams. Second, we designed a digital toolkit featuring 23 strategies identified in the review. Third, six inclusive researchers evaluated the toolkit. We illustrate how our team used these evidence-informed strategies during the past year to develop this and other tools to support inclusive research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At this critical time of reckoning with histories and present legacies in Canada, we come together as an emergent collaborative research team to reflect on how education and wider systems in this country have shaped our individual and collective experiences. As we affirm our practice of visiting and sharing histories from embodied perspectives and commitments in order to build relations, we find echoes in the concepts and practices of Métis and Black/African-Caribbean diasporic communities that we are in relation to. The notion of e-race-sures helps us name the gaps that our communities have experienced in the cultural imaginaries and literal making of Canada where racialized notions of belonging have enabled colonization and entitled (largely white) settlement. Beyond remediating these gaps, the notion of reclamations allows us to move past deficiencies and affirm what has always been there. This move facilitates thinking and acting accountably in relations that exceed what is underwritten by a seemingly coherent history and present story of Canada. By sharing our individual stories in places in the text, the authors name how we each come to know e-race-sures and reclamations in our own lives. But in collectivizing our stories and finding common resonances, we insist on the power of coalitional possibilities and on the need to make room for other communities and stories beyond ours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A research collaboration at the National Museums of Kenya since 2005 has resulted in the publication of several books. The project's focus is the participatory documentation of the indigenous knowledge systems of the Amîîrû communities of the Kenyan central highlands. A confluence of disciplines and perspectives creates a forum for knowledge sharing, dissemination, and creation. This study describes the development of this collaboration, along with the challenges that have been overcome, including a methodological controversy: a gap exists between an anti-essentialist ethnography with empirical case studies, in which I have long-standing anthropological confidence, and indigenous essentialism, the approach of providing a generalised description of a culture, favoured by authors from the source communities. This study evaluates the latter approach within the socio-cultural contexts of the Amîîrû community and a controversy over the (un)certainty of African customary laws. I distinguish between two essentialisms – indigenous and strategic – and argue that the former can provide a bridge to the legal essentialism that characterises the Restatement of African Law books. I argue that this framework can inform the collaborative task of revising what is already in place to ascertain African law. Further, the task requires bridging the generalised description and empirical case methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The research works of Professor Michael Brunger have spanned a period of more than 40 years. In this paper, we set out to record his contributions in the field of Atomic and Molecular Physics by using a bibliometric analysis approach. Firstly, we give an overview of his publication and citations, and we highlight his top 10 cited papers and their impact in this field of research. Secondly, we explore the diversity of his research areas in general. Finally, we perform an analysis of his research collaborations with international groups with clear visualization. We have used a wide range of bibliometric indicators: citation indicators; indices of structural difference; indicators of scientific collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]