ISI Document Delivery No.: 274OV Times Cited: 1 Cited Reference Count: 85 Cited References: Artuso F, 2007, ATMOS ENVIRON, V41, P3877, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.024 Aydin M, 2011, NATURE, V476, P198, DOI 10.1038/nature10352 Banda N, 2013, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V13, P2267, DOI 10.5194/acp-13-2267-2013 Bloom AA, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P322, DOI 10.1126/science.1175176 Bousquet P, 2005, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V5, P2635 Bousquet P, 2006, NATURE, V443, P439, DOI 10.1038/nature05132 Bousquet P, 2011, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V11, P3689, DOI 10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011 Brunke EG, 2001, ATMOS ENVIRON, V35, P777, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00260-0 Chen YH, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES, V111, DOI DOI 10.1029/2005JD006058 Chevallier F, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V110, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006390 Crevoisier C, 2009, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V9, P6337 Cunnold DM, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD001226 Decharme B, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009376 Decharme B, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1054-9 Dlugokencky E. J., 2011, AGU FALL M, pD6 Dlugokencky EJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P447, DOI 10.1038/30934 Dlugokencky EJ, 1996, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V23, P2761, DOI 10.1029/96GL02638 DLUGOKENCKY EJ, 1994, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V99, P17021, DOI 10.1029/94JD01245 Dlugokencky EJ, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V110, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006035 Dlugokencky EJ, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI 10.1029/2003GL018126 Dlugokencky EJ, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL039780 EDGAR 4, 2009, EDGAR 4 EM DAT GLOB EPA, 2011, 430D11003 US EPA Folberth G, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2004GL021812 Francey RJ, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P279, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)0562.0.CO;2 Frankenberg C, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL034300 Frappart F, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044010 FUNG I, 1991, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V96, P13033, DOI 10.1029/91JD01247 Gauci V, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JG000499 Gomez-Pelaez A., 2010, P S ATM CHEM PHYS MO, P157 Guimberteau M, 2012, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V16, P911, DOI 10.5194/hess-16-911-2012 Hauglustaine DA, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JD003957 Heimann M., 2011, AGU FALL M, pC6 Hess LL, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V87, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.001 Hodson EL, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL046861 HOGAN KB, 1994, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V21, P2445, DOI 10.1029/94GL02601 Hourdin F, 2006, CLIM DYNAM, V27, P787, DOI 10.1007/s00382-006-0158-0 Kai FM, 2011, NATURE, V476, P194, DOI 10.1038/nature10259 Kaminski T, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P4703, DOI 10.1029/2000JD900581 Kaplan J. O., 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29 Kirschke S, 2013, NAT GEOSCI, V6, P813, DOI 10.1038/NGEO1955 Koven CD, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P14769, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1103910108 Krinner G, 2005, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V19, DOI 10.1029/2003GB002199 Lamarque JF, 2010, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V10, P7017, DOI 10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010 Langenfelds RL, 2002, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V16, DOI 10.1029/2001GB001466 Lawrence D. M., 2007, CLIM DYNAM, V30, P145, DOI [10.1007/s00382-007-0278-1, DOI 10.1007/S00382-007-0278-1] Levin I, 2012, NATURE, V486, pE3, DOI 10.1038/nature11175 LOWE DC, 1991, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V96, P15455, DOI 10.1029/91JD01119 Matsueda H., 2004, PAP METEOROL GEOPHYS, V54, P91, DOI [10.2467/mripapers.54.91, DOI 10.2467/MRIPAPERS.54.91] Matthews E., 1987, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICA, V1, P61, DOI DOI 10.1029/GB001I001P00061 Melton JR, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P753, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-753-2013 Miguez-Macho G, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2012JD017539 Miller JB, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2006GL029213 Monteil G, 2011, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V11, P9141, DOI 10.5194/acp-11-9141-2011 Montzka SA, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P67, DOI 10.1126/science.1197640 Montzka SA, 2000, SCIENCE, V288, P500, DOI 10.1126/science.288.5465.500 Morino I, 2011, ATMOS MEAS TECH, V4, P1061, DOI 10.5194/amt-4-1061-2011 Olivier J. G. J., 2001, CLIMATE SYSTEM, V33-77 Papa F, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JD012674 Peylin P, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD000857 Peylin P, 2000, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V114, P295 Pison I, 2009, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V9, P5281 Prigent C, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2012GL051276 Prinn R. G., 2012, AGAGE DATA BASE Prinn RG, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V105, P17751, DOI 10.1029/2000JD900141 Prinn RG, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2004GL022228 Rigby M, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL036037 Ringeval B, 2011, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V8, P2137, DOI 10.5194/bg-8-2137-2011 Ringeval B, 2010, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V24, DOI 10.1029/2008GB003354 Ringeval B, 2013, CLIM PAST, V9, P149, DOI 10.5194/cp-9-149-2013 Ringeval B, 2012, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V5, P941, DOI 10.5194/gmd-5-941-2012 Schmidt M., 2006, 168 WMO, P165 Simpson IJ, 2012, NATURE, V488, P490, DOI 10.1038/nature11342 Sussmann R, 2012, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V12, P4885, DOI 10.5194/acp-12-4885-2012 Uppala SM, 2005, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V131, P2961, DOI 10.1256/qj.04.176 van der Werf GR, 2010, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V10, P11707, DOI 10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010 van der Werf GR, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V6, P3423 van der Werf GR, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P73, DOI 10.1126/science.1090753 Viovy N., 2009, COMBINED DATASET ECO Walter BP, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P34189, DOI 10.1029/2001JD900165 Walter BP, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P34207, DOI 10.1029/2001JD900164 Wang JS, 2004, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V18, DOI 10.1029/2003GB002180 Wania R, 2013, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V6, P617, DOI 10.5194/gmd-6-617-2013 White JR, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JG000609 Worthy DEJ, 1998, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V103, P15995, DOI 10.1029/98JD00925 Pison, I. Ringeval, B. Bousquet, P. Prigent, C. Papa, F. Papa, Fabrice/D-3695-2009 Papa, Fabrice/0000-0001-6305-6253 1 COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH GOTTINGEN ATMOS CHEM PHYS; Two atmospheric inversions (one fine-resolved and one process-discriminating) and a process-based model for land surface exchanges are brought together to analyse the variations of methane emissions from 1990 to 2009. A focus is put on the role of natural wetlands and on the years 2000-2006, a period of stable atmospheric concentrations. From 1990 to 2000, the top-down and bottom-up visions agree on the time-phasing of global total and wetland emission anomalies. The process-discriminating inversion indicates that wetlands dominate the time-variability of methane emissions (90% of the total variability). The contribution of tropical wetlands to the anomalies is found to be large, especially during the post-Pinatubo years (global negative anomalies with minima between -41 and -19 Tg yr(-1) in 1992) and during the alternate 1997-1998 El-Nino/1998-1999 La-Nina (maximal anomalies in tropical regions between +16 and +22 Tg yr(-1) for the inversions and anomalies due to tropical wetlands between +12 and +17 Tg yr(-1) for the process-based model). Between 2000 and 2006, during the stagnation of methane concentrations in the atmosphere, the top-down and bottom-up approaches agree on the fact that South America is the main region contributing to anomalies in natural wetland emissions, but they disagree on the sign and magnitude of the flux trend in the Amazon basin. A negative trend (-3.9 +/- 1.3 Tg yr(-1)) is inferred by the process-discriminating inversion whereas a positive trend (+1.3 +/- 0.3 Tg yr(-1)) is found by the process model. Although processed-based models have their own caveats and may not take into account all processes, the positive trend found by the B-U approach is considered more likely because it is a robust feature of the process-based model, consistent with analysed precipitations and the satellite-derived extent of inundated areas. On the contrary, the surface-data based inversions lack constraints for South America. This result suggests the need for a re-interpretation of the large increase found in anthropogenic methane inventories after 2000.