Search

Background: This study examines the impact of donor liver macrovesicular steatosis on recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease after liver transplantation. Methods: Between 1998 and 2004, 113 patients underwent liver transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis. Time to histologic recurrence (fibrosis score Z2) was the primary endpoint of the study. Recurrence was graded according to the system of Ludwigand Batts. ACox’s proportional hazard regressionmodelwas usedto analyse the association between donor liver steatosis and HCV recurrence. Results: Recurrence-free survival for patients who received steatotic grafts was 82% and 47% at 1 and 4 years, respectively, and81% and52% for patients who receiveda non-steatotic liver. Donor macrovesicular steatosis (5‐45%) was found to have no impact on HCVrecurrence (P=0.47).Donorage( P=0.02) and cold ischaemia time (P=0.01) were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. The estimated risk of HCVrecurrence increased by 23% for every 10-year increase in donor age. Similarly the riskofrecurrence increasedby 13% forevery 1-h increasein coldischaemiatime. Conclusion: Mild-moderate donor liver macrovesicular steatosis has no impact on HCV recurrence after liver transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis. Cold ischaemia time and donor age increased the likelihood of HCVrecurrence. The extent of liver allograft fibrosis caused by severe recurrent hepatitis C appears to be increasing in recent years. Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients who have undergone liver transplantation after 1995 appear to be progressing more rapidly to cirrhosis than those who underwent transplantation before 1995 (1, 2). Reasons for this increasingly rapid progression to liver failure in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients include a putative increased susceptibility of ‘marginal’ and older donor livers to HCV-related injury, and a suggestion that the stronger immunosuppressive medications used since 1995 may decrease resistance to HCV aggressiveness. Recent reports also suggest that allografts from older donors, those with longer ischaemia times, and grafts from living donors are associated with an increased severity of HCVrecurrence (2‐4). The increasing demand for donor livers, in the face of a static supply, is reflected by the fact that the waiting list for donor livers has increased by over 600% from 2,902 to 17,692 from 1993 to 2005 (4). Many liver transplantation centres have been forced to modify their criteria for acceptable donor grafts in order to accommodate the increased demand. Modified or ‘expanded’ criteria include using older donors, donors with longer ischaemia times, donation after cardiac death, livers with certain viral infections, obese donors, and steatotic (fatty) livers (5). These donor livers, which were previously designated as ‘marginal’, are now being used commonly. Between 6% and 21% of donor livers now being used are steatotic and the most common causes for hepatic steatosis in the general population are alcohol abuse, diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemias, pregnancy, and medications (6‐8). Markin et al. (9) showed in a landmark study that 1-year patient and graft survival is not affected by transplantation of donor livers with mild to moderate macrovesicular steatosis (o45%) when compared with patients transplanted with nonsteatotic donor livers . However, whether steatosis affects HCVrecurrence is unknown. No definitive relationship linking the use of mildmoderate steatotic donor livers with rapid progression of fibrosis, post-transplant liver failure, or decreased graft survival in patients with HCVexists. The aim of

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of a low-dose chemotherapy regimen in children with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) –positive, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) after organ transplantation who have experienced failure with front-line therapy for PTLD. Patients and Methods Eligible patients received cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 intravenous for 1 day) and prednisone (2 mg/kg orally for 5 days) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Results Thirty-six patients treated on study were assessable for analyses. Front-line therapies for PTLD before study entry included immune suppression reduction or withdrawal (n = 36), antiviral therapy (n = 33), surgical resection (n = 8), rituximab (n = 2), and interferon alfa (n = 1). Reasons for failure of front-line therapy included progressive disease (PD; n = 33) and persistent disease with concurrent allograft rejection (n = 3). Thirty patients (83%) had stage III to IV disease, 92% had extranodal disease, and 75% had ≥ three sites of disease. The overall response rate was 83% (75% complete response + 8% partial response). The relapse rate was 19%, with only one of five relapsed patients alive and disease-free. Four patients presented with fulminant, disseminated PTLD; only one of these four patients achieved a response, and all four died of PD. Two patients died of treatment-related toxicity. Three patients (8%) experienced allograft loss, but two of the three patients are alive and disease-free after a second transplantation. The 2-year overall, relapse-free, and failure-free (without PTLD and with functioning original allograft) survival rates were 73%, 69%, and 67%, respectively. Conclusion This low-dose chemotherapy regimen is effective for children with EBV-positive, nonfulminant PTLD who have experienced treatment failure with front-line therapy, and this study represents the largest series of PTLD patients treated prospectively with a uniform chemotherapy regimen.

Background The role of portosystemic shunt (PSS) in children with portal hypertension has changed because of acceptance of liver transplantation and endoscopic hemostasis. We report our experience with PSS, mainly the distal splenorenal shunt, to define its role in the management of variceal bleeding. Study design From 1987 to 2002, 20 children with variceal bleeding after endoscopic therapy underwent PSS. Patient and database records were reviewed. Results There were 14 boys and 6 girls; mean age was 11 years (range 3 to 18 years). Seventeen distal splenorenal and three mesocaval venous interposition shunts were performed. There was no operative mortality, 19 patients were alive at a median followup of 31 months (range 4 to 168 months) without evidence of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient underwent transplantation 2 years after PSS and 1 patient died of hepatic failure while awaiting transplantation. The cause of portal hypertension was portal vein thrombosis (n = 13), biliary atresia (n = 3), congenital hepatic fibrosis (n = 2), hepatitis C cirrhosis (n = 1), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1). Eighteen children were Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and the remaining two were class B. One patient had two episodes of hematemesis after PSS. Two patients had worsening ascites. One patient had mild encephalopathy and one patient had shunt stenosis requiring angioplasty. Conclusions PSS is a safe and durable therapy for pediatric patients with portal hypertension. Liver transplantation should be reserved for children with poor synthetic function associated with variceal bleeding. PSS may also serve as a bridge to transplantation in patients with preserved hepatic function. PSS, in particular the distal splenorenal shunt, has produced excellent results. This experience challenges the need for alternative forms of portal decompression.

A 26-year-old woman presented with acute Budd-Chiari syndrome 18 weeks into a pregnancy. She was found to be heterozygous for the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation. She was treated with portacaval shunt placement and successfully completed the pregnancy, with a healthy baby delivered at 31 weeks' gestation. She developed progressive liver failure after delivery of the child, likely associated with clotting of the shunt, which occurred in the face of full anticoagulation. The patient subsequently underwent a technically complicated orthotopic liver transplantation, but died 10 months after transplantation. This case illustrates the challenges involved in the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome, in addition to difficulties balancing the health of a mother and an unborn child. It is the only case of surgical treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome during pregnancy reported in the literature. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:976-979.)

Results of liver transplantation in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma have been poor as a result of the high incidence of locoregional dissemination and tumor recurrence. This study evaluates the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy combined with orthotopic liver transplantation in a carefully selected group of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Seventeen patients were included in the study. The neoadjuvant protocol included 6,000 cgy biliary brachy-therapy delivered through percutaneous transhepatic catheters and intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (300mg/m2/day) until transplantation. Five of the 17 patients demonstrated tumor progression precluding transplantation. One patient died of sepsis on the waiting list. Eleven patients underwent liver transplantation, a median of 3.4 months (range = 1-26 months) after diagnosis. Five of the 11 (45%) are alive without evidence of tumor recurrence with a median follow up of 7.5 years (range = 2.8-14.5 years). Six deaths occurred in the transplanted patients. Tumor recurrence was responsible for two deaths at 10 and 18months, respectively, after transplantation. Three mortalities resulted from bacterial or fungal peritonitis and sepsis. One patient underwent re-transplantation for chronic rejection and died from graft failure resulting from hepatic artery thrombosis 16 months after diagnosis without evidence of tumor recurrence. Complications of transhepatic catheter placement included bile duct perforation (n = 4) and biliary-portal vein fistula (n = 1). All these patients died of tumor recurrence or sepsis. Cholangiocarcinoma should not be considered an absolute exclusion criteria for orthotopic liver transplantation. Long-term, tumor-free survival was achieved in 45% of the transplanted patients. Complications of biliary catheter placement for brachytherapy were associated with poor outcome.

To evaluate experience with isolated orthotopic liver transplantation in children with liver failure associated with short bowel syndrome (SBS).Infants who have liver failure as a result of SBS are frequently referred for consideration for combined liver and small bowel transplantation. In a few patients the liver disease develops despite a seemingly adequate bowel, which if given time and appropriate management has the potential for full enteral adaptation. There is a limited literature suggesting the utility of OLT without replacement of the native bowel. The advantages over combined liver and small bowel transplantation are clear: organ availability is greater, liver-reduction techniques are well established, lower immunosuppression is required, and there is greater experience in the care of children after orthotopic liver transplantation.Eleven infants, considered to have a good prospect of eventual gut adaptation to full enteral nutrition if it were not for their advanced liver disease, underwent isolated orthotopic liver transplantation. Age range was 6.5 to 17.7 months. All patients had been dependent on parenteral feeding but had also shown significant enteral tolerance at some time before listing for transplantation. Advanced liver disease was apparent both clinically and on histologic examination. All were jaundiced and had low albumin levels, and most had coagulopathy. As a group the infants had growth retardation. Estimated remaining length of small bowel beyond the ligament of Treitz was in the range of 25 to more than 100 cm. Six infants retained their ileocecal valve.Thirteen liver transplants were performed in the 11 patients. A combination of whole livers (n = 6) and reduced-size grafts, of which three were from living-related donors, were used. Biliary anastomosis was duct-to-duct in eight instances and involved a short Roux limb in the others. Eight patients are alive with follow-up of 15 to 66 months. Three deaths have occurred after transplantation as a result of sepsis. Of eight surviving patients, only two continue to receive intravenous support and in both there is increasing enteral tolerance. Since transplantation, all surviving children have shown adequate growth with maintenance of pretransplant centiles.In selected infants with liver failure secondary to short bowel syndrome in whom complete enteral autonomy is anticipated, isolated liver transplantation can offer long-term survival.

The report served to establish the “ethical” foun-dation for initiating a series of surgical procedures inwhich a living adult would be subjected to partial hep-atectomy to obtain a segment of liver for transplanta-tion to a child. At the time, the mortality for infantsawaiting liver transplantation was said to be 50%. Asevidenceoftheirqualificationstoproceed,theChicagogroup cited two distinct accomplishments. First, in thelaboratory, 8 of 9 recipient dogs and all 9 donor dogswerealiveandwellafterundergoingproceduressimilarto the planned clinical surgery. Second, a retrospectivereview of the group’s experience in performing partialhepatectomies in patients without cirrhosis showed nodeaths in 35 patients.The current report (the authorship of whichincludes Siegler and Broelsch from the 1989 report)represents a similar effort to examine the ethical issuesrelated to extending the use of live donation to providelivertransplantationforadults.Theauthorsbeginwiththe traditional justification, namely the shortage ofcadaveric organs and the alarming risk of death foradults awaiting a cadaveric donor liver. Additional jus-tification is necessary, of course, because the risk to adonor is believed to be greater when a larger portion ofhis or her liver is removed for transplantation. Notunexpectedly,theiranalysisleadsthemtoconcludethat“the high risks taken by donors undergoing a hemi-hepatectomy seems to be justified by the steadilyincreasingmortalityofadultrecipients(sic)waitingfortransplantation.”Eschewingamoretraditionaldiscussionoftheethicsinvolvedinlivingorgandonation,theauthorschooseamore practical analysis of the level of expertise and thetypes of facilities they believe are required. A section oftheir manuscript is entitled “Who Can or Should Per-form ALDLT?” and, within it, the authors list “Opti-mal Institutional Requirements.” Clearly, the intent isto provide a starting point for self-regulation, an admi-rable and timely goal.Unfortunately, in developing their recommenda-tions, the authors bring their considerable reputationsbut little objective data. More than apparent is theirconfidence that by setting the bar high for entry quali-fications, they are protecting the unwary public fromuncontrolled participation by unprepared surgeons.Equally unapparent is their recognition that by speak-ing out now, well after their own programs are estab-lished, their credibility courts parochialism. That thequalifications cited are those that each of their centerspresently meets does little to discourage such anunhappy union.Thatsaid,oneneedstobeginsomewhereindefininghow best to deal with the specter of untrained surgicalhordes bearing down on a public all too willing to giveapieceofitslivertosaveitssoul.Theauthorsdowelltoadvocate self-regulation within the profession, specifi-cally through implementation of authoritative qualifi-cations.Perhapsourgreatestchallengegoingforwardisdefining those qualifications on the basis of sound evi-dence whenever practical. The political pressures tomake them either too restrictive or too liberal wouldseem considerable.The authors also examine some of the ethical andphilosophicalissuesarisingfromthenearlyoverwhelm-ingtemptationstoextendtheindicationsforlivertrans-plantationbeyondthosegenerallyacceptedfortheallo-cation of cadaveric organs. But while the authors laterstatethat“healthprofessionalsareexpectedtomakethefinal determination on the appropriateness of the indi-cations,” they stop short of suggesting that health pro-fessionalshaveanobligationtoprotectthepublicfromitself.Instead,theauthorsbelievethattheneedforgoodpublic stewardship in decisions governing allocation ofcadaver organs need not necessarily apply to live dona

Background. Intestinal transplantation has become an accepted therapy for short bowel syndrome and other types of intestinal failure. In order to assess digestive capabilities and feeding practices in a group of 22 pediatric patients after intestinal transplantation, we assessed mucosal disaccharidase activities and assimilation of total dietary lipid and vitamin E. Twelve of the patients had undergone contemporaneous liver transplantation. Methods. Mucosal biopsies were assayed for disaccharidase activities between 15 and 412 days after transplantation in 7 of the 22 when all were receiving some enteral nutrition and were free of rejection. Coefficients of lipid absorption were determined in those patients receiving total enteral feeding (two-thirds polymeric/one-third elemental) between 43 and 1032 days after transplantation; oral vitamin E tolerance tests were done at about the same time. Results. Activities of lactase, sucrase, maltase, and palatinase consistently exceeded reference ranges (P

Transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease. Among the various options for treating the complications of portal hypertension, it is the only one that addresses the underlying liver disease. In a previous era, the management of liver disease centered around the management of complications. Often, the surgeon's role was to perform a palliative procedure when medical management failed to control such complications. For example, in an effort to treat patients with intractable ascites, LeVeen and colleagues in 1974 developed a one-way valve mechanism that was activated by increased intraperitoneal pressure, causing transfer of ascitic fluid through a catheter inserted into the superior vena cava. 11a Although the peritoneal-venous shunt effectively relieved ascites and delayed recurrence of ascites when compared to medical treatment, it failed to prolong survival. 19 For patients with bleeding esophageal varices, a variety of surgical portosystemic shunts have been shown to control hemorrhage when medical therapy fails. Although much has been written concerning the risks and benefits of the different types of surgical shunts since Eck's first description in 1877, there has never been much argument that these operations did anything to treat the underlying liver disease. The presence of varices in a patient with cirrhosis indicates a 25% to 33% risk of hemorrhage. After the first bleeding episode, the risk of rebleeding can be as high as 70%. 16 The choice of treatment of esophagogastric varices depends on both the severity of the underlying liver disease and the patient presentation. In those patients who are noted by endoscopy to have nonbleeding varices, initial treatment may be preventive with β-blockers. 11 Over the last 15 years endoscopic management of esophageal varices has relegated surgical options to a secondary role in most patients. Several authors have compared sclerotherapy to distal splenorenal shunt as primary management, and have found equivalent survival. 15,17 In the setting of acute hemorrhage, bleeding can be controlled with a combination of sclerotherapy, vasoconstrictors, and balloon tamponade in 80% to 95% of cases. 5 Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been successful as a second line of therapy for patients in whom bleeding could not be controlled by the previously mentioned methods 1 ; however, for chronic portal hypertension in Child's class A or B, TIPS is associated with a high rate of failure, including early thrombosis in 12% and stenosis in 41%, both of which are associated with a high incidence of rebleeding. 1 Thus, for patients that can tolerate a major surgery, either an operative shunt or liver transplantation appear to be better options for the long-term control of complications of portal hypertension. And, as pointed out earlier, the choice between these two surgical options is based on the severity of the underlying liver disease. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease, and should not be considered a specific treatment for portal hypertension. Rather, it is a treatment option for liver failure. Of course, because complications of portal hypertension may be the first manifestation of significant liver disease in many patients, the first steps in the evaluation of treatment options must always include an assessment of the severity of liver disease.

Our objective was to determine the immunologic response to two influenza vaccine doses in 39 children who had undergone liver transplantation. Patients received two doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine 4 weeks apart. Sera were collected 4 weeks after each dose and analyzed by a hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) for evidence of antibody response to the antigens A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1), A/Beijing/32/92 (H3N2), and B/Panama/45/95. Patients with HAI titers of 1:40 or greater were considered to have protective titers. Twenty-six (67%) patients showed a 1:40 or greater titer response to A/Beijing/32/92 1 month after the first vaccination. Only two additional patients were found to have similar titers after the second dose. A higher proportion of patients with protective titers were on smaller amounts of prednisone for body weight or alternate day low dose (< 10 mg/day) prednisone compared to patients on daily low dose or daily high dose prednisone. Patients with protective titers were significantly older (9.0 +/- 2.8 years) than those without protective titers (4.2 +/- 3.4 years, p = .002) following the first inoculation of the A/Beijing/32/92 vaccine component. Similar results were found for the second vaccination and with the H1N1 antigen. Cyclosporine level, gender, and body mass index were not associated with any outcome measures. We conclude that most liver transplant recipients had a protective antibody titer after a single influenza inoculation, but little further advantage was gained after an additional dose. Vaccination of household contacts of younger patients and those patients on daily prednisone or patient chemoprophylaxis may offer greater benefit in prevention of influenza in liver transplant recipients than multiple vaccine doses with current vaccine preparations.

It is not well understood whether posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) alters postoperative morbidity. This study was designed to evaluate this question. All adult patients who received an OLTx between July 1985 and March 1993 (n = 497) were evaluated by retrospective chart review for evidence of PTDM after OLTx. The patients identified with PTDM (n = 26) were case matched with nondiabetic OLTx recipients based on primary liver disease diagnosis, age, gender, date of first OLTx, and survival. Liver synthetic function, number and severity of rejection episodes, graft survival, total number of hospital days within the first year post-OLTx, renal function, and number and type of infection episodes were analyzed to assess differences in morbidity between the PTDM and control patients after OLTx. Of the 497 adult patients who underwent OLTx, 26 (5.2%) were identified as having PTDM within 1 month of discharge. Factors which identified individuals at higher risk for DM after OLTx included higher pre-OLTx fasting blood glucose (P = .04); lower body mass index after OLTx (P = .02); and cyclosporine rather than OKT3 induction (P = .009). Graft survival, synthetic function, and the total number of rejection episodes during the first year were not different between the two groups. The morbidity variables of total number of days in the hospital during the first 12 months, renal function, and type and number of infections were also similar between the two groups. In summary, 5.2% of adult patients developed DM within 1 month of OLTx. Pre-existing insulin resistance, postoperative stress, and immunosuppression medications all likely contribute to the development of overt hyperglycemia after OLTx. Although PTDM can be a consequence of OLTx, it does not have a significant impact on patient outcome in the first year after OLTx.

Liver transplantation has become the major therapy for acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. Survival rates range from 46% to 89%. Appropriate patient selection, timely referral, and management of common complications have improved survival. Donor organ shortage may prompt further use of extracorporeal support systems and auxillary transplantation in the future. This article reviews the American experience of liver transplantation in patients with ALF.

Objective : To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with cystic fibrosis considered for liver transplantation and the clinical outcome after transplantation. Methods : Patient charts were reviewed. Mutation analysis was performed on blood or liver tissue samples with a panel of 17 mutations. Results : Eight patients (five girls) with cystic fibrosis have undergone orthotopic liver transplantation for biliary cirrhosis. Mean age at transplantation was 12.0 years ±7.7 years (range, 9 months to 23 years). Preoperatively, seven patients had mild to moderate pulmonary dysfunction and one moderate to severe pulmonary dysfunction. All patients required pancreatic enzyme replacement, and four patients required insulin for diabetes mellitus. The 1-year survival rate was 75%, with no deaths related to septic events. Mean time of follow-up of the six operative survivors was 4.1 years ±1.9 years. Pulmonary function testing, in those serially tested, showed that forced expiratory volume in 1 second was maintained or improved and that forced vital capacity improved after transplantation. Mutation analysis showed the following genotypes: four patients, ΔF508/ΔF508; one patient, ΔF508/N1303K; and three patients, ΔF508/unknown. Conclusions : Despite the high risk of transplantation, these encouraging results indicate that liver transplantation should be considered for patients with cystic fibrosis and complications of end-stage liver disease. We could not demonstrate an unusual pattern of CF gene mutations in these patients with severe liver disease. It appeared that immunosuppressive agents did not have a deleterious effect on pulmonary function. (J P EDIATR 1995;127:881-7)

In an effort to determine the total one-year cost of liver transplantation, the underlying drivers of that cost, and any cost differences between alternative immunosuppressive regimens, an analysis was performed comparing the average one-year posttransplant charges of 322 patients participating in the "U.S. Multi-center Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing FK-506 to Cyclosporine in Liver Transplantation." Total one-year inpatient charges including all readmissions were examined. Professional fees and outpatient charges were excluded. Costs for tacrolimus drug and blood assays were assumed to be equal to those in the CsA group. For patients completing the study, the tacrolimus group had an average length of stay and average one-year cost seven days (P = .06) and $19,290 (P = .05) lower than the CsA group. The difference in rejection profiles between the two arms seems to largely account for the lower costs. The tacrolimus arm consistently had fewer patients in the more severe rejection groups. Increased incidence and severity of rejection were directly related to higher average lengths of stay and costs of transplantation (P < .001). Tacrolimus immunosuppression during the first year after liver transplantation is more cost-effective than CsA in achieving similar patient and graft survival rates. Differing incidence and severity of rejection can dramatically affect the first-year cost of liver transplantation.

Evidence indicates that the accumulation of glutamine in the brain plays an important role in the pathogenesis and severity of the encephalopathy of acute liver failure (ALF). This study uses in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) to assess brain glutamine (GLN) in five cases of acute liver failure. The findings are consistent with prior investigations and suggest that the alpha 1H of the GLN molecule can be used for noninvasive spectroscopic quantitation of brain GLN in patients with ALF.

In summary, the following principles are worth reiterating: 1. In the treatment of acute liver failure, protection of the native liver in anticipation that it will recover, but positioning of the allograft in a manner that optimizes its function for both the short and long term (in the event that the native liver does not recover) are important goals. Therefore, orthotopic positioning offers advantages over the heterotopic position in most cases. Development of better techniques for predicting native liver recovery might remove any of these advantages of the orthotopic position. 2. Other than the presence of fibrosis, the performance of a native liver biopsy does not appear to predict native liver recovery. The decision of whether to attempt auxiliary grafting must be based on an understanding of the natural history of the disease causing the acute liver failure. 3. The heterotopic position has the advantage of not requiring partial native hepatectomy in order to accommodate the allograft. However, except for the recent experience of Terpstra et al, this technique has carried a higher risk of venous outflow obstruction. It also requires additional space within the abdomen, usually mandating the use of prosthetic abdominal wall closures and the construction of venous conduits for portal venous inflow to the liver. There is the additional theoretical concern about competition for portal venous flow leading to eventual atrophy of the allograft liver. 4. Common events that follow liver transplantation result in changes in portal venous resistance within the liver, events that therefore alter the relative distribution of portal venous inflow between native and auxiliary livers. These events include reperfusion injury, allograft rejection, allograft viral infection (e.g., cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, recurrent viral hepatitis), and native liver regeneration. Attempts to control portal venous flow to favor one liver over the other must account for the effect of these factors. 5. In general terms, auxiliary transplantation is not indicated for diseases in which the residual native liver either represents an ongoing threat to the recipient or is incapable of supporting life alone. This may be the case in both metabolic disorders and in cirrhosis. Most of the alleged difficulties of native hepatectomy are no longer relevant. Therefore, auxiliary transplantation is rarely if ever indicated for chronic liver disease and may not be of any additional benefit over total transplantation in the treatment of many metabolic disorders. 6. In the treatment of acute liver failure, the value of an auxiliary transplant over total transplant is obtained when the native liver recovers and the patient is withdrawn from immunosuppression. If further experience shows the effectiveness of this option, total liver transplantation with the requirement for life-long immunosuppression will no longer be appropriate for the treatment of patients with acute liver disease.

We report on the efficacy and safety of FK506 (tacrolimus) compared with a cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive regimen after 1 year of treatment in pediatric liver allograft recipients (< 12 years) participating in a multicenter U.S. randomized trial. Patients received either FK506 or CsA as primary immunosuppression following a first ABO-compatible liver transplant. Intravenous FK506 was initiated at 0.1 mg/kg per day, followed by oral FK506 beginning at 0.3 mg/kg per day. The dose was adjusted to maintain plasma trough levels of 0.5-2.0 ng/ml. The CsA group was treated according to each center's usual protocol. Both groups received the same initial doses of corticosteroids. All rejection episodes were biopsy-proven and a standardized algorithm was adopted for the treatment of rejection. Thirty patients were randomized to the FK506 group and 20 to the CsA group. After twelve months of follow-up 20 patients remained in the FK506 group and 13 in the CsA group. Patient survivals were 80% and graft survival 70% in the FK506 group compared with 81% and 71% respectively, in the CsA group. 48% of the FK506 group remained rejection-free compared with 21% of the CsA group, and 79% of FK506-treated patients did not require OKT3 compared with 68% of CsA treated patients. The cumulative corticosteroid dose was less at each time point throughout the first year in the FK506 group. The incidence of serious and minor infections was similar in both groups. Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and gastrointestinal disturbances were the major toxicities reported. Differences did not reach statistical significance between the two groups although major neurologic events, diarrhea and dyspepsia were more often reported in the FK506 group. There was no difference in mean serum creatinine at 12 months between the two groups. There was a tendency toward lower mean serum cholesterol in the FK506 group. There was no hirsuitism in the FK506 group compared with a 30% incidence in the CsA group. In conclusion, compared with CsA, there is a trend toward less rejection in FK506-treated pediatric allograft recipients, while both drugs have a similar spectrum of side effects.

We determined the incidence and outcome of aplastic anemia among 56 patients who underwent liver transplantation for fulminant liver failure at the University of Nebraska Medical Center between July 1985 and December 1993. Aplastic anemia developed in 6 of 18 (33%) children and 1 of 19 (5%) adults who had fulminant non-A, non-B hepatitis; no cases of aplastic anemia occurred among patients with other causes of fulminant liver failure. None of these patients had evidence of a preexisting hematological disorder or infection with hepatitis C virus (as determined with a second-generation ELISA). Aplastic anemia was diagnosed at a median of 4 wk after the onset of hepatitis, with five cases seen before transplantation. Six patients received antithymocyte globulin to promote remission of aplastic anemia. Three children died (fungal infection in two, intracranial hemorrhage in one)--one at 43, one at 108 and one at 119 days after transplantation--without remission of aplastic anemia. Among the four surviving patients, with median follow-up of 25 mo, complete and partial remission of aplastic anemia have occurred in three and one, respectively. Liver allograft function is stable in all surviving patients. The data demonstrate that aplastic anemia is a common complication among children who undergo liver transplantation for fulminant non-A, non-B hepatitis. It is associated with a high rate of mortality, although most survivors appear to have full hematological recovery.

Bile acid metabolism and biliary secretion were characterized in the first 2 wk after orthotopic liver transplantation in 15 patients receiving cyclosporine and in five patients receiving FK 506. Analyses were performed on hepatic bile obtained by T-tube drainage; values obtained were compared with literature values for bile samples obtained in patients who had undergone cholecystectomy. Biliary bile acid output, which is equivalent to bile acid biosynthesis from cholesterol, was low (mean +/- S.E.M.) and increased with time: day 1, 0.50 +/- 0.1 mmol/day; day 3, 0.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/day; and day 6, 1.6 +/- 0.5 mmol/day. Chenodeoxycholic acid biosynthesis, as percent of total bile acid biosynthesis, was abnormally low in patients receiving cyclosporine (16.2 +/- 1.1) but not in patients receiving FK 506 (38.2 +/- 4.8) (p < 0.005). Before the T-tube was clamped, the proportion of deoxycholic acid (a secondary bile acid formed by bacterial 7-dehydroxylation of cholic acid) was low in both groups: cyclosporine, 0.4 +/- 0.1; FK 506, 4.8 +/- 2.5 (p < 0.01). The mean concentration of bile acids in hepatic bile between days 4 and 11 did not differ significantly between groups: cyclosporine, 7.7 +/- 1.3 mmol/L; FK 506 4.3 +/- 0.7 mmol/L (mean +/- S.E.M.). (These values are similar to those reported for patients who have undergone cholecystectomy.) Bile acid-dependent bile flow, expressed as apparent choleretic activity (microliters of bile per micromole of bile acid output), was markedly elevated: in patients receiving cyclosporine the value was 129, and in patients receiving FK 506 the value was 220. (In patients who have undergone cholecystectomy, this value is less than 30).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

As protocols of immunosuppression improve in selectivity and, more importantly, as clinicians become more adept at tailoring the degree of immunosuppression to the needs of individual patients, both enthusiasm and success with organ transplantation in the elderly will improve. This has particular relevance as the average age of the population is increasing. Arbitrary age limits, largely the products of the 1970s and early 1980s, have now been abandoned. Nevertheless, the enthusiasm to demonstrate skill in treating the older patient must be tempered by an understanding of the extreme shortage of available donor organs. In terms of lifeyears saved, the older patient offers much less potential than younger patients. At some point, the coexistence of other lifethreatening illnesses in older patients must influence the desire to save older lives.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine nutritional outcome and growth in children after successful intestinal transplantation. Methods: Case-record review was conducted of all children who underwent intestinal transplantation at a single center and retained their grafts for at least 1 year. Supplementary data were obtained from outpatient charts and computerized database. Results: Forty-seven intestinal transplants were carried out in 46 children. There were 19 isolated small bowel and 29 combined liver[ndash ]small bowel transplant procedures. Median age at transplantation was 3.7 years (range, 0.4 to 16.6 years), and median graft survival time was 1,084 days (range, 368 to 3308 days). Nine patients died, and there were 11 graft losses, including those of the nonsurvivors. All survivors with functioning grafts receive all of their calories via the enteral route. There was significant inhibition of linear growth at the time of transplant in the majority of recipients. After successful transplantation, pretransplant growth velocity appeared to be maintained, but there was no evidence of catch-up growth. Conclusions: Intestinal transplantation allows an opportunity for full enteral feedings to be established. There is evidence of severe inhibition of linear growth at the time of transplantation with no evidence of catch-up after transplantation.

Although combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) has become a valid treatment option for selected type I diabetics, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy remains controversial. We analyzed results and morbidity in 30 type I diabetics undergoing PKT after starting dialysis (PKT:D) versus 31 type I diabetics undergoing PKT prior to dialysis (PKT:ND). The two groups were similar with the respect to age, duration and severity of diabetes, gender, race, preservation time, retransplants, sensitization, HLA-matching, and CMV status. The mean preoperative serum creatinine was higher in the PKT:D group (9.9 +/- 3.4 vs. 3.9 +/- 1.9 mg/dl PKT:ND, P0.01). All patients were managed with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Actuarial patient survival is 100% (PKT:D) and 96.8% (PKT:ND). Renal and pancreas allograft survival are 97% and 93%, respectively, in both groups. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, reflux pancreatitis, and total hospital days was similar in both groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were like-wise comparable. No adverse coagulation or immunologic effects were noted in the PKT:ND group. Rehabilitation potential favored the PKT:ND group. PKT can be performed safely and effectively in the absence of uremia. In selected type I diabetics with significant nephropathy, we believe that PKT is the best treatment option and need not be considered as preemptive, especially in view of increasing waiting times and the variable progressive nature of diabetic complications.

Vascularized pancreas transplantation (PT) is becoming an accepted therapy for selected type I diabetic patients. However, selection and evaluation criteria remain uncertain. In the last 3.5 years, we have interviewed 205 and evaluated 151 diabetic patients for PT. The degree of renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance below 45 ml/min) was used to select patients for combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) or solitary pancreas transplantation (PTA) (clearance above 70 ml/min). The cardiovascular evaluation (stress thallium study with liberal use of coronary angiography) was used to determine operative risk and provided the other major selection criterion. A total of 104 patients were selected as candidates for PT; 70 have undergone PKT with 98.6% patient survival (1 cardiovascular death), 97.1% kidney graft survival, and 94.2% pancreas graft survival. Thirty-three evaluated patients (24.1%) were not accepted as candidates for PT; 13 have undergone cadaveric kidney transplantation, 5 were placed on the kidney waiting list, and 9 have died. Criteria for PTA include 2 or more diabetic complications or hyperlabile diabetes. Patient (n = 12) and pancreas graft survival after PTA is 83.3 and 50%, respectively. Our conclusion is that a multidisciplinary approach was used for recipient selection for PT based on degree of nephropathy, cardiovascular risk, and presence of diabetic complications. Nearly 75% of diabetic patients evaluated were acceptable candidates for PT. Only 4 (3.8%) of these selected patients died while awaiting or undergoing PT, thus optimizing the use of scarce allograft resources and providing evidence for appropriate patient selection.

The University of Pittsburgh policy for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors recognizes the potential for conflicts of interest between caring for a "hopelessly ill" patient who has forgone life-sustaining treatment and caring for a potential organ donor. The policy calls for a separation between those medical personnel who care for the gravely ill patient and those involved with the care of transplant recipients. While such a separation is possible in theory, it is difficult or impossible to attain in practice. However, such a separation of duties would be unnecessary if an arbitrator were appointed to monitor the proceedings as they take place on a case-by-case basis. In this way, the biases--real or potential--of the individuals involved could be identified, and the harmful effects of the unavoidable conflicts of interest could be minimized.

The benefits of pancreas transplantation (PT) must be weighed against the morbidity associated with the operative procedure and long-term immunosuppression. Over a 32-month period, we performed 73 PTs including 61 combined pancreas-kidney transplants (PKT) and 12 solitary PTs. In the PKT group, 25 reoperations were performed in 18 patients (29.5%) at a mean of 39 +/- 12 days after transplant. In the solitary PT group, 16 reoperations were performed in 8 recipients (66.7%, p = 0.03) at a mean of 87 +/- 12 days after PT (p0.01). In the PKT group, pancreas allograft survival was 93.4%. Vascular thrombosis resulted in the loss of two pancreas allografts. In the solitary PT group, pancreas allograft survival was 50% (p0.001), with 6 transplant pancreatectomies performed for either infectious (5) or vascular (1) complications. Surgical complications after PT are common (35.6% in this series), occur earlier in patients who undergo PKT, and are more frequent and morbid in patients undergoing solitary PT, especially after a previous kidney transplant. An aggressive surgical approach can lead to a high rate of pancreas allograft salvage without jeopardizing either the patient or the renal allograft.

An unusual type of diffuse biliary tract injury after liver transplantation that is characterized by multiple intrahepatic biliary strictures, ductal dilatations, fluid collections, or intrahepatic abscesses has been identified. Over a 5-year period, a total of 10 patients (2%) developed diffuse intrahepatic biliary injury with established vascular patency and no obvious source for their biliary tract pathology. All patients received livers preserved in University of Wisconsin solution with a mean preservation time of 16 hours. This biliary tract injury was associated with the presence of severe preservation injury and Roux limb biliary reconstruction. Of the 10 patients, 5 were treated nonoperatively with multiple stricture dilations and stent placements, 3 underwent retransplantation, 1 was treated operatively with hepaticojejunostomy, and 1 died of sepsis. This study suggests that this complication appears to be related to preservation injury and that the etiology may be ischemic in origin.

We initiated a policy of using RSLT in critically ill patients in June of 1988. Since that time we have performed 30 RSLTs in 29 patients, including 28 children and 1 adult. The mean age of the children was 27 months (range 1 month to 10 years) with 14 (52%) being 1 year of age or less. The mean weight was 11.3 kg (range 2-50 kg) with 20 being 10 kg or less. A total of 22 patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of RSLT including 9 who were intubated. Of the 30 RSLTs, 23 were performed as a primary transplant while 7 were retransplants. Indications for primary transplantation included biliary atresia (n = 11), fulminant hepatic failure (n = 5), neonatal hepatitis (n = 4) and others (n = 3). The RSLT was used in retransplantation for primary nonfunction (n = 2), hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 2), chronic rejection (n = 2), and herpetic hepatitis (n = 1). The size reductions included 18 left lobes, 7 left lateral segments, and 5 right lobes. This group includes the use of the split-liver technique, which was applied to 10 patients (5 livers). The median donor/recipient weight ratio for left lobe transplants was 2:1; left lateral segments was 7.3:1; and right lobes 1.6:1. One year actuarial patient and graft survivals were 68 and 65%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 10.6 months. The number of children dying awaiting transplantation has been significantly reduced following the introduction of RSLD (3 of 115, 2.6% vs. 12 of 95, 13%; P less than 0.02).

Splanchnic venous inflow is considered mandatory to ensure graft survival after liver transplantation. Over a 68-month period, we performed 570 liver transplants in 495 patients. Portal vein thrombosis was present in 16 patients. At transplant, the extent of the occlusion included portal vein alone (n = 4), portal including confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins (n = 8), portal, splenic, and distal superior mesenteric veins (n = 2), and the entire portal vein, splenic vein, and superior mesenteric vein (n = 2). The operative approach included thrombectomy alone (n = 5), anastomosis at the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric splenic veins (n = 8), and extra-anatomic venous reconstruction (n = 3). The mean operative blood loss was 22 ± 22 units, and the mean operative time was 9.7 ± 4.8 hours. The 1-year actuarial survival rate was 81%, with a mean follow-up of 12.5 months. In summary, with a selective approach and the use of innovative forms of splanchnic venous inflow, portal vein thrombosis is no longer a contraindication to liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of valproic acid (VPA)-induced hepatotoxicity and to discuss the incidence rates, risk factors, possible etiologies, preventive measures, and treatment courses for this severe reaction. DATA SOURCES: Case reports, review articles, and relevant laboratory studies identified by MEDLINE. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were abstracted from pertinent published sources by one author and reviewed by the remaining authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: The case of a 23-year-old woman with VPA-associated hepatic failure was successfully treated with orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatic failure is a rare, often fatal, adverse effect of VPA. Most cases of VPA-associated hepatic failure have occurred within several months of initiation of therapy. Initial symptoms of presentation often include nausea and vomiting, lethargy, or loss of seizure control. Laboratory values to be monitored include serum concentrations of hepatic enzymes, and, in some patients, tests indicative of the liver's synthetic capabilities. The exact mechanism of VPA-associated hepatic failure has not been clearly established; however, it is postulated to involve the formation of toxic metabolites. Major risk factors include age less than two years and concomitant treatment with more than one anticonvulsant. Other significant risk factors include underlying metabolic or serious neurologic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be taken when initiating VPA therapy and clinicians should be familiar with the risk factors and clinical presentation of this reaction.

Over a 57-month period, we performed 430 orthotopic liver transplants in 372 patients. A total of 38 vascular complications were identified including hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 24), portal vein thrombosis (n = 6), combined hepatic artery thrombosis/portal vein thrombosis (n = 3), and hepatic artery rupture (n = 5). A number of potential risk factors for the development of vascular thrombosis were evaluated with only children, weight less than 10 kg, and cold ischemia time found to be significant. The clinical presentation included fulminant hepatic failure, allograft dysfunction, biliary sepsis, and screening ultrasound. Duplex ultrasonography was diagnostic in nearly all cases. Therapeutic modalities included revascularization, revascularization followed by retransplantation, retransplantation alone, and observation. Five cases of hepatic artery rupture occurred in four patients. Infectious arteritis was present in four patients. The 6-month actuarial survival in patients with vascular complications was 70%. Early diagnosis is critical for graft salvage, with surgical intervention the mainstay of therapy.

UNLABELLED During a 38-month period, we studied 320 liver transplants in 283 recipients (202 adults, 81 children). CMV disease was documented in 85 patients (30.0%) The major risk factor for CMV disease was primary CMV exposure (transplanting a seropositive allograft into a seronegative recipient). A total of 42 patients (14.8%) had primary CMV exposure. Twenty-one patients were historical controls, while the next 21 received prophylaxis for CMV infection in a nonrandomized trial of consecutive study groups. The regimen of prophylaxis consisted of intravenous immune globulin (IgG; 0.5 g/kg) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks and acyclovir for 3 months. CMV prophylaxis resulted in a dramatic reduction in the incidence of CMV disease (71.4% vs. 23.8%, (P less than 0.01). All cases of CMV were treated with intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 14 days), with 5 patients in the control group developing recurrent CMV disease (33.3% relapse). In the 16 patients receiving prophylaxis who did not develop CMV disease, all developed positive CMV-IgG titers with the passive administration of IgG. However, none developed any evidence of CMV infection or viral shedding as assessed by IgM titers and surveillance viral cultures. Four deaths occurred (all control patients), but none were related to CMV disease. Overall patient and graft survivals after primary CMV exposure were 90.5% and 82.2%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 14 months. CONCLUSION Primary CMV exposure is a major risk factor for CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. Intravenous IgG plus acyclovir is safe and effective in preventing CMV infection and disease in this setting. Because of the scarcity of donor organs, we do not advocate protective matching to avoid primary CMV exposure but rather recommend prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in this high-risk group.

A persistent problem in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is primary nonfunction (PNF) of the hepatic allograft. In most instances the cause of the failure is unknown. In an attempt to minimize these graft failure, modifications in the procurement and operative procedure have been investigated. One change in the procedure at the University of Nebraska Medical Center has been the monitoring of the temperature of the fluid in the back table bath during preparation of the donor liver. Our initial procedure involved creating an ice slurry of lactated Ringer's solution and ice slush in which the donor liver was then prepared. The temperature of this ice slurry was retrospectively found to be from -3 degrees C to -1 degrees C (group I). In this group there was a higher-than-expected incidence of PNF. To investigate whether the temperature of the back table bath influenced the incidence of PNF, beginning with transplant No. 42 the preparation of the back table bath was modified. The bath was created by adding a small amount of PlasmaLyte slush to 2 L of PlasmaLyte (group II). The temperature of the bath was maintained at 2-4 degrees C. Data were collected on 100 consecutive liver transplants. All transplants were performed using standard techniques, the operation for the two groups differing only as described above. Transaminase levels were followed as an index of the allograft function and were expected to begin to normalize within 2-3 days after transplantation. While both groups display this trend, transaminase levels in group II were significantly lower postoperatively than group I levels (P less than 0.05). Preoperative values were similar. There were 7 PNFs in group I; 0 in group II (P less than 0.005). We feel that the change in the back table procedure has positively influenced the function of the hepatic allografts, and we conclude that transplant centers need to monitor the temperature at which all allografts are stored and prepared, and the cognizant that this may influence the postoperative function of the transplanted liver.

At the present time, liver transplantation must be considered among the treatment options for patients with variceal hemorrhage. For a significant percentage of variceal bleeders throughout the world, however, transplantation is not a viable option either because the patient is not an appropriate transplant candidate or because of the etiology of the patient's portal hypertension. Sclerotherapy and portosystemic shunts remain the mainstay of therapy for these patients. The survival rates with liver transplantation are superior to those reported for other therapies for variceal hemorrhage in patients who have moderate or severe liver disease in addition to variceal hemorrhage. Child's C patients whose variceal hemorrhage is controlled medically should be evaluated for transplantation and receive chronic sclerotherapy while they wait on the transplant list. If the variceal hemorrhage cannot be controlled medically in a transplant candidate, then the patient should undergo an emergency shunt procedure. The shunt of choice is a large-bore H-graft mesocaval or mesorenal shunt. This shunt effectively controls the acute hemorrhage, is relatively simple to perform, does not adversely impact on the subsequent liver transplant, and can simply be ligated after the transplant is completed. Patients who experience variceal hemorrhage as the only manifestation of their liver disease should be treated initially with endoscopic sclerotherapy. For that small group of patients who are either not candidates for sclerotherapy or who rebleed despite sclerotherapy, the choice of shunt or transplantation is presently a difficult one, because both therapies provide excellent results in this group of patients. The choice of therapy should be made on an individual basis and only after consultation with both transplant and shunt surgeons. If a shunt is chosen, we prefer the DSRS because it maintains hepatic portal perfusion in many patients and does not require dissection of the porta hepatis. The management of patients with a prior portosystemic shunt at the time of transplantation depends on the type of shunt and the duration of time between the shunt and the transplant. Shunts not involving the hepatic hilum have little adverse impact on the performance of the transplant. There are insufficient data to assess accurately the effect of a prior portacaval shunt on the transplant. However, our clinical experience and that of other transplant groups indicate that the transplantation of these patients is technically more difficult than that of patients with shunts not involving the hilum. With the availability of other shunting procedures that do not involve extensive dissection of the hepatic hilum, there is little role for either end-to-side or side-to-side portacaval shunts in patients who are potential liver transplant candidates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

As the results with liver transplantation have improved, a controversy has arisen regarding the precise role of a portoenterostomy in the treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The controversy centers around three issues: (1) the short- and long-term survival rates achieved with both procedures, (2) the influence of a portoenterostomy on a subsequent transplant, and (3) the shortage of suitable liver donors for very small infants. To address these questions, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 48 children with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation and compared these results with 35 children transplanted for other liver diseases. As a group, the biliary atresia patients had significantly lower mean body weights and ages and spent a significantly longer time on the waiting list. In addition, significantly more of the biliary atresia patients had undergone prior abdominal surgery when compared with the non-biliary atresia group. There was no difference in the intraoperative variables of mean anesthesia time, mean operative time, mean anesthesia preparation time, nor the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively between the two groups. However, when the biliary atresia patients who had undergone a portoenterostomy with a stoma were compared with either the biliary atresia patients who did not have a stoma created as part of their portoenterostomy or the non-biliary atresia patients, significant differences were noted in mean total anesthesia time, mean operative time, and the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively. The survival rate of the biliary atresia patients was significantly greater than the non-biliary atresia patients. The overall incidence of reoperations was not different between the two groups but reoperations on the biliary tract were significantly more common in the non-biliary atresia patients. Finally, when the biliary atresia patients who died while awaiting transplantation were compared with those who received transplants, the former group were found to be significantly younger and have a significantly lower mean body weight than the group who received transplants. Based on our data and a review of the literature, an algorithm is presented for the management of patients with biliary atresia.

Infants with short bowel syndrome (SBS) and associated liver failure are often referred for combined liver/intestinal transplantation. We speculated that in some young children, nutritional autonomy would be possible with restoration of normal liver function. Features we believed to predict nutritional autonomy include history of at least 50% enteral tolerance, age less than 2 yr, and no underlying intestinal disease. This report documents our experience with liver transplantation alone in children with liver failure associated with SBS. Twenty-three children with SBS and end-stage liver disease, considered to have good prognostic features for eventual full enteral adaptation, underwent isolated liver transplantation. Median age was 11 months (range, 6.5 to 48 months). Median pretransplant weight was 7.4 kg (range, 5.2 to 15 kg). All had growth retardation and advanced liver disease. Bowel length ranged from 25 to 100 cm. Twenty-three children underwent 28 isolated liver transplants. There were 14 whole livers and 14 partial grafts (five living donors). Seventeen patients are alive at a median follow-up of 57 months (range, 6 to 121 months). Actuarial patient and graft survival rates at 1 yr are 82% and 75% and at 5 yr are 72% and 60%, respectively. Four deaths resulted from sepsis, all within 4 months of transplantation, and 1 death resulted from progressive liver failure. Two allografts developed chronic rejection; both children were successfully retransplanted with isolated livers. Of 17 surviving patients, three require supplemental intravenous support; the remaining 14 have achieved enteral autonomy, at a median of 3 months (range, 1 to 72 months) after transplantation. Linear growth is maintained and, in many, catch-up growth is evident. Median change in z score for height is 0.57 (range, -4.47 to 2.68), and median change in z score for weight is 0.42 (range, -1.65 to 3.05). In conclusion, Isolated liver transplantation in children with liver failure as a result of SBS, who have favorable prognostic features for full enteral adaptation, is feasible with satisfactory long-term survival.

The cause of eosinophilic gastroenteropathy in older children and adults is unknown. In this report, two post–liver transplantation children treated with low-dose cyclosporine A and alternate-day low-dose prednisone are described who were administered a single bolus administration of a lympholytic dose of corticosteroids without taper and who developed intestinal symptomatology several weeks later. Histologic examination of mucosal biopsy specimens from various regions of the gastrointestinal tract showed an intense eosinophilic infiltration of the mucosa and lamina propria. The patients recovered after corticosteroid administration was tapered. Post-transplant gastroenteric eosinophilic inflammation may need to be considered in patients on immunomodulatory medications who have chronic intestinal symptomatology. (Liver Transpl Surg 1997 Nov;3(6):591-3)

Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common malignant liver tumor in children. The application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the management of unresectable HB may add new therapeutic opportunities. We evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent liver transplantation for treatment of unresectable HB in the period between August 1985 and June 2003. Ten children had a diagnosis of unresectable HB. Mean age at transplantation was 5.8 yr. Eight patients were transplanted with deceased donor grafts. Two patients underwent LDLT. Pre-transplant chemotherapy was used in 90% of cases. Post-transplant survival ranges from 3.7 to 18.6 yr. Three patients died of recurrent disease at 4, 14 and 38 months. The two LDLT recipients were able to get pre-transplant chemotherapy with a rapid decision towards transplantation; both are alive and well at 5.5 and 11 yr post-transplant. Our experience supports the role of LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation in the management of unresectable HB when waiting times can be detrimental to the patient's survival.

The objective was to examine the perception of physical and psychosocial functioning of pediatric intestinal transplant recipients who are beyond the perioperative period and compare these with normal and chronically ill children. Child and parent forms of the Child Health Questionnaire were administered to all 29 pediatric intestinal transplant recipients between the ages of 5 and 18 years who had had a small bowel transplantation 1 year previous and had a functional allograft. Comparison was made with published norms and scores for pediatric patients on hemodialysis. Intestinal transplant recipients (on average 5 years after intestinal transplantation and at a mean age 11 years) reported similar scores in all domains compared with normal children. Parents of intestinal transplant recipients noted decreased function in several domains related to their child's general health, physical functioning, and the impact of the illness on parental time, emotions and family activities. Intestinal transplant recipients beyond the perioperative period perceive their physical and psychosocial functioning as similar to normal school children. Parental proxy assessments differ from the recipients, with the parent's perception of decreased general health and physical functioning for intestinal transplant recipients compared with norms.

The role of portosystemic shunt (PSS) in children with portal hypertension has changed because of acceptance of liver transplantation and endoscopic hemostasis. We report our experience with PSS, mainly the distal splenorenal shunt, to define its role in the management of variceal bleeding.From 1987 to 2002, 20 children with variceal bleeding after endoscopic therapy underwent PSS. Patient and database records were reviewed.There were 14 boys and 6 girls; mean age was 11 years (range 3 to 18 years). Seventeen distal splenorenal and three mesocaval venous interposition shunts were performed. There was no operative mortality, 19 patients were alive at a median followup of 31 months (range 4 to 168 months) without evidence of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient underwent transplantation 2 years after PSS and 1 patient died of hepatic failure while awaiting transplantation. The cause of portal hypertension was portal vein thrombosis (n = 13), biliary atresia (n = 3), congenital hepatic fibrosis (n = 2), hepatitis C cirrhosis (n = 1), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1). Eighteen children were Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and the remaining two were class B. One patient had two episodes of hematemesis after PSS. Two patients had worsening ascites. One patient had mild encephalopathy and one patient had shunt stenosis requiring angioplasty.PSS is a safe and durable therapy for pediatric patients with portal hypertension. Liver transplantation should be reserved for children with poor synthetic function associated with variceal bleeding. PSS may also serve as a bridge to transplantation in patients with preserved hepatic function. PSS, in particular the distal splenorenal shunt, has produced excellent results. This experience challenges the need for alternative forms of portal decompression.

The syndrome of multiple intestinal atresia with immunodeficiency is a rare, invariably fatal congenital disorder. At 16 months of age, a child with this syndrome underwent liver-small bowel transplantation from a 1-of-6 HLA-matched donor. He acquired full enteral tolerance and normal liver function and has never shown evidence of allograft rejection. After mild graft-versus-host disease developed, studies revealed that more than 99% of his CD3+ lymphocytes and 50% of his CD19+ lymphocytes were of donor origin, whereas granulocytes and monocytes remained of recipient origin. He synthesizes polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM and has developed antibodies to cytomegalovirus (CMV) and parainfluenza 3. His T lymphocytes are predominately CD3+CD4-CD8- with T-cell receptor γδ heterodimers and CD3+CD4-CD8+ with CD8αα homodimers, populations consistent with an intraepithelial lymphocyte phenotypic profile. We postulate that he has engrafted a donor intestine-derived immune system and is incapable of rejecting his engrafted organs. (Blood. 2004;103:1171-1174)