103 results on '"Boachie C"'
Search Results
2. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX)
- Author
-
REFLUX Trial Group, Grant, A M, Cotton, S C, Boachie, C, Ramsay, C R, Krukowski, Z H, Heading, R C, and Campbell, M K
- Published
- 2013
3. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX)
- Author
-
Grant, A M, Cotton, S C, Boachie, C, Ramsay, C R, Krukowski, Z H, Heading, R C, and Campbell, M K
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Nuclear magnetic resonance‐based metabolomics identifies phenylalanine as a novel predictor of incident heart failure hospitalisation:results from PROSPER and FINRISK 1997
- Author
-
Delles, C. (Christian), Rankin, N. J. (Naomi J.), Boachie, C. (Charles), McConnachie, A. (Alex), Ford, I. (Ian), Kangas, A. (Antti), Soininen, P. (Pasi), Trompet, S. (Stella), Mooijaart, S. P. (Simon P.), Jukema, J. W. (J. Wouter), Zannad, F. (Faiez), Ala‐Korpela, M. (Mika), Salomaa, V. (Veikko), Havulinna, A. S. (Aki S.), Welsh, P. (Paul), Würtz, P. (Peter), and Sattar, N. (Naveed)
- Subjects
Phenylalanine ,FINRISK ,Metabolomics ,Heart failure ,PROSPER ,Advanced lipoprotein profiling - Abstract
Aims: We investigated the association between quantified metabolite, lipid and lipoprotein measures and incident heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) in the elderly, and examined whether circulating metabolic measures improve HFH prediction. Methods and results: Overall, 80 metabolic measures from the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) trial were measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (n = 5341; 182 HFH events during 2.7‐year follow‐up). We repeated the work in FINRISK 1997 (n = 7330; 133 HFH events during 5‐year follow‐up). In PROSPER, the circulating concentrations of 13 metabolic measures were found to be significantly different in those who were later hospitalised for heart failure after correction for multiple comparisons. These included creatinine, phenylalanine, glycoprotein acetyls, 3‐hydroxybutyrate, and various high‐density lipoprotein measures. In Cox models, two metabolites were associated with risk of HFH after adjustment for clinical risk factors and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP): phenylalanine [hazard ratio (HR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–1.53; P = 0.002] and acetate (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.98; P = 0.026). Both were retained in the final model after backward elimination. Compared to a model with established risk factors and NT‐proBNP, this model did not improve the C‐index but did improve the overall continuous net reclassification index (NRI 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.35; P = 0.007) due to improvement in classification of non‐cases (NRI 0.14; 95% CI 0.12–0.17; P
- Published
- 2018
5. Prehabilitation is feasible in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and may minimize physical deterioration: results from the REx trial
- Author
-
Moug, S. J., primary, Mutrie, N., additional, Barry, S. J. E., additional, Mackay, G., additional, Steele, R. J. C., additional, Boachie, C., additional, Buchan, C., additional, and Anderson, A. S., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Comparison between high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and cardiac troponin I in a large general population cohort
- Author
-
Welsh, P, Preiss, D, Shah, ASV, Mcallister, D, Briggs, A, Boachie, C, McConnachie, A, Hayward, C, Padmanabhan, S, Welsh, C, Woodward, M, Campbell, A, Porteous, D, Mills, NL, Sattar, N, Welsh, P, Preiss, D, Shah, ASV, Mcallister, D, Briggs, A, Boachie, C, McConnachie, A, Hayward, C, Padmanabhan, S, Welsh, C, Woodward, M, Campbell, A, Porteous, D, Mills, NL, and Sattar, N
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few data compare cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in a general population. We sought to evaluate the distribution and association between cTnT, cTnI, and cardiovascular risk factors in a large general population cohort. METHODS: High-sensitivity cTnT and cTnI were measured in serum from 19501 individuals in the Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study. Associations with cardiovascular risk factors were compared using ageand sex-adjusted regression. Observed age- And sexstratified 99th centiles were compared with 99th centiles for cTnT (men, 15.5 ng/L; women, 9.0 ng/L) and cTnI (men, 34.2 ng/L; women, 15.6 ng/L) used in clinical practice. RESULTS: cTnT and cTnI concentrations were detectable in 53.3% and 74.8% of participants, respectively, and were modestly correlated in unadjusted analyses (R2 = 21.3%) and only weakly correlated after adjusting for age and sex (R2 = 9.5%). Cardiovascular risk factors were associated with both troponins, but in age- And sexadjusted analyses, cTnI was more strongly associated with age, male sex, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure (P < 0.0001 for all vs cTnT). cTnT was more strongly associated with diabetes (P < 0.0001 vs cTnI). The observed 99th centiles were broadly consistent with recommended 99th centiles in younger men and women. After the age of 60 years, observed 99th centiles increased substantially for cTnT, and beyond 70 years of age, the 99th centiles approximately doubled for both troponins. CONCLUSIONS: In the general population, cTnT and cTnI concentrations are weakly correlated and are differentially associated with cardiovascular risk factors. The 99th centiles currently in use are broadly appropriate for men and women up to but not beyond the age of 60 years.
- Published
- 2018
7. Metabolomic consequences of genetic inhibition of PCSK9 compared with statin treatment
- Author
-
Sliz, E. (Eeva), Kettunen, J. (Johannes), Holmes, M. V. (Michael V.), Williams, C. O. (Clare Oliver), Boachie, C. (Charles), Wang, Q. (Qin), Maennikkoe, M. (Minna), Sebert, S. (Sylvain), Walters, R. (Robin), Lin, K. (Kuang), Millwood, I. Y. (Iona Y.), Clarke, R. (Robert), Li, L. (Liming), Rankin, N. (Naomi), Welsh, P. (Paul), Delles, C. (Christian), Jukema, J. W. (J. Wouter), Trompet, S. (Stella), Ford, I. (Ian), Perola, M. (Markus), Salomaa, V. (Veikko), Jaervelin, M.-R. (Marjo-Riitta), Chen, Z. (Zhengming), Lawlor, D. A. (Debbie A.), Ala-Korpela, M. (Mika), Danesh, J. (John), Davey Smith, G. (George), Sattar, N. (Naveed), Butterworth, A. (Adam), Wuertz, P. (Peter), Sliz, E. (Eeva), Kettunen, J. (Johannes), Holmes, M. V. (Michael V.), Williams, C. O. (Clare Oliver), Boachie, C. (Charles), Wang, Q. (Qin), Maennikkoe, M. (Minna), Sebert, S. (Sylvain), Walters, R. (Robin), Lin, K. (Kuang), Millwood, I. Y. (Iona Y.), Clarke, R. (Robert), Li, L. (Liming), Rankin, N. (Naomi), Welsh, P. (Paul), Delles, C. (Christian), Jukema, J. W. (J. Wouter), Trompet, S. (Stella), Ford, I. (Ian), Perola, M. (Markus), Salomaa, V. (Veikko), Jaervelin, M.-R. (Marjo-Riitta), Chen, Z. (Zhengming), Lawlor, D. A. (Debbie A.), Ala-Korpela, M. (Mika), Danesh, J. (John), Davey Smith, G. (George), Sattar, N. (Naveed), Butterworth, A. (Adam), and Wuertz, P. (Peter)
- Abstract
Background: Both statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors lower blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to reduce risk of cardiovascular events. To assess potential differences between metabolic effects of these 2 lipid-lowering therapies, we performed detailed lipid and metabolite profiling of a large randomized statin trial and compared the results with the effects of genetic inhibition of PCSK9, acting as a naturally occurring trial. Methods: Two hundred twenty-eight circulating metabolic measures were quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, including lipoprotein subclass concentrations and their lipid composition, fatty acids, and amino acids, for 5359 individuals (2659 on treatment) in the PROSPER (Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk) trial at 6 months postrandomization. The corresponding metabolic measures were analyzed in 8 population cohorts (N=72 185) using PCSK9 rs11591147 as an unconfounded proxy to mimic the therapeutic effects of PCSK9 inhibitors. Results: Scaled to an equivalent lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the effects of genetic inhibition of PCSK9 on 228 metabolic markers were generally consistent with those of statin therapy (R²=0.88). Alterations in lipoprotein lipid composition and fatty acid distribution were similar. However, discrepancies were observed for very-low-density lipoprotein lipid measures. For instance, genetic inhibition of PCSK9 had weaker effects on lowering of very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with statin therapy (54% versus 77% reduction, relative to the lowering effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; P=2×10⁻⁷ for heterogeneity). Genetic inhibition of PCSK9 showed no significant effects on amino acids, ketones, or a marker of inflammation (GlycA), whereas statin treatment weakly lowered GlycA levels. Conclusions: Genetic inhibition of PCSK9 had similar metabolic effects to statin therapy on detaile
- Published
- 2018
8. Erratum to:Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers
- Author
-
Gopalakrishna, G, Langendam, M, Scholten, R, Bossuyt, P, Leeflang, M, Noel-Storr, A, Thomas, J, Marshall, I, Wallace, B, Whiting, P, Davenport, C, GopalaKrishna, G, De Salis, I, Mallett, S, Wolff, R, Riley, R, Westwood, M, Kleinen, J, Collins, G, Reitsma, H, Moons, K, Zapf, A, Hoyer, A, Kramer, K, Kuss, O, Ensor, J, Deeks, JJ, Martin, EC, Riley, RD, Rücker, G, Steinhauser, S, Schumacher, M, Snell, K, Willis, B, Debray, T, Deeks, J, Di Ruffano, LF, Taylor-Phillips, S, Hyde, C, Taylor, SA, Batnagar, G, STREAMLINE COLON Investigators, STREAMLINE LUNG Investigators, METRIC Investigators, Seedat, F, Clarke, A, Byron, S, Nixon, F, Albrow, R, Walker, T, Deakin, C, Zhelev, Z, Hunt, H, Yang, Y, Abel, L, Buchanan, J, Fanshawe, T, Shinkins, B, Wynants, L, Verbakel, J, Van Huffel, S, Timmerman, D, Van Calster, B, Zwinderman, A, Oke, J, O'Sullivan, J, Perera, R, Nicholson, B, Bromley, HL, Roberts, TE, Francis, A, Petrie, D, Mann, GB, Malottki, K, Smith, H, Billingham, L, Sitch, A, Gerke, O, Holm-Vilstrup, M, Segtnan, EA, Halekoh, U, Høilund-Carlsen, PF, Francq, BG, Dinnes, J, Parkes, J, Gregory, W, Hewison, J, Altman, D, Rosenberg, W, Selby, P, Asselineau, J, Perez, P, Paye, A, Bessede, E, Proust-Lima, C, Naaktgeboren, C, De Groot, J, Rutjes, A, Reitsma, J, Ogundimu, E, Cook, J, Le Manach, Y, Vergouwe, Y, Pajouheshnia, R, Groenwold, R, Peelen, L, Nieboer, D, De Cock, B, Pencina, MJ, Steyerberg, EW, Cooper, J, Parsons, N, Stinton, C, Smith, S, Dickens, A, Jordan, R, Enocson, A, Fitzmaurice, D, Adab, P, Boachie, C, Vidmar, G, Freeman, K, Connock, M, Court, R, Moons, C, Harris, J, Mumford, A, Plummer, Z, Lee, K, Reeves, B, Rogers, C, Verheyden, V, Angelini, GD, Murphy, GJ, Huddy, J, Ni, M, Good, K, Cooke, G, Hanna, G, Ma, J, Moons, KGMC, De Groot, JAH, Altman, DG, Reitsma, JB, Collins, GS, Moons, KGM, Kamarudin, AN, Kolamunnage-Dona, R, Cox, T, Borsci, S, Pérez, T, Pardo, MC, Candela-Toha, A, Muriel, A, Zamora, J, Sanghera, S, Mohiuddin, S, Martin, R, Donovan, J, Coast, J, Seo, MK, Cairns, J, Mitchell, E, Smith, A, Wright, J, Hall, P, Messenger, M, Calder, N, Wickramasekera, N, Vinall-Collier, K, Lewington, A, Damen, J, Cairns, D, Hutchinson, M, Sturgeon, C, Mitchel, L, Kift, R, Christakoudi, S, Rungall, M, Mobillo, P, Montero, R, Tsui, T-L, Kon, SP, Tucker, B, Sacks, S, Farmer, C, Strom, T, Chowdhury, P, Rebollo-Mesa, I, Hernandez-Fuentes, M, Damen, JAAG, Debray, TPA, Heus, P, Hooft, L, Scholten, RJPM, Schuit, E, Tzoulaki, I, Lassale, CM, Siontis, GCM, Chiocchia, V, Roberts, C, Schlüssel, MM, Gerry, S, Black, JA, Van der Schouw, YT, Peelen, LM, Spence, G, McCartney, D, Van den Bruel, A, Lasserson, D, Hayward, G, Vach, W, De Jong, A, Burggraaff, C, Hoekstra, O, Zijlstra, J, De Vet, H, Graziadio, S, Allen, J, Johnston, L, O'Leary, R, Power, M, Johnson, L, Waters, R, Simpson, J, Fanshawe, TR, Phillips, P, Plumb, A, Helbren, E, Halligan, S, Gale, A, Sekula, P, Sauerbrei, W, Forman, JR, Dutton, SJ, Takwoingi, Y, Hensor, EM, Nichols, TE, Kempf, E, Porcher, R, De Beyer, J, Hopewell, S, Dennis, J, Shields, B, Jones, A, Henley, W, Pearson, E, Hattersley, A, MASTERMIND consortium, Scheibler, F, Rummer, A, Sturtz, S, Großelfinger, R, Banister, K, Ramsay, C, Azuara-Blanco, A, Burr, J, Kumarasamy, M, Bourne, R, Uchegbu, I, Murphy, J, Carter, A, Marti, J, Eatock, J, Robotham, J, Dudareva, M, Gilchrist, M, Holmes, A, Monaghan, P, Lord, S, StJohn, A, Sandberg, S, Cobbaert, C, Lennartz, L, Verhagen-Kamerbeek, W, Ebert, C, Horvath, A, Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Jenniskens, K, Peters, J, Grigore, B, Ukoumunne, O, Levis, B, Benedetti, A, Levis, AW, Ioannidis, JPA, Shrier, I, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Kloda, LA, McMillan, D, Patten, SB, Steele, RJ, Ziegelstein, RC, Bombardier, CH, Osório, FDL, Fann, JR, Gjerdingen, D, Lamers, F, Lotrakul, M, Loureiro, SR, Löwe, B, Shaaban, J, Stafford, L, Van Weert, HCPM, Whooley, MA, Williams, LS, Wittkampf, KA, Yeung, AS, Thombs, BD, Cooper, C, Nieto, T, Smith, C, Tucker, O, Dretzke, J, Beggs, A, Rai, N, Bayliss, S, Stevens, S, Mallet, S, Sundar, S, Hall, E, Porta, N, Estelles, DL, De Bono, J, CTC-STOP protocol development group, and National Institute for Health Research
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena ,MEDLINE ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,BTC (Bristol Trials Centre) ,MASTERMIND consortium ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Intensive care medicine ,CTC-STOP protocol development group ,lcsh:R5-920 ,business.industry ,Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine ,Published Erratum ,STREAMLINE COLON Investigators ,3. Good health ,STREAMLINE LUNG Investigators ,Centre for Surgical Research ,Family medicine ,METRIC Investigators ,High Energy Physics::Experiment ,Erratum ,business ,lcsh:Medicine (General) - Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s41512-016-0001-y.].
- Published
- 2017
9. Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers.
- Author
-
Gopalakrishna, G, Langendam, M, Scholten, R, Bossuyt, P, Leeflang, M, Noel-Storr, A, Thomas, J, Marshall, I, Wallace, B, Whiting, P, Davenport, C, GopalaKrishna, G, de Salis, I, Mallett, S, Wolff, R, Riley, R, Westwood, M, Kleinen, J, Collins, G, Reitsma, H, Moons, K, Zapf, A, Hoyer, A, Kramer, K, Kuss, O, Ensor, J, Deeks, JJ, Martin, EC, Riley, RD, Rücker, G, Steinhauser, S, Schumacher, M, Snell, K, Willis, B, Debray, T, Deeks, J, di Ruffano, LF, Taylor-Phillips, S, Hyde, C, Taylor, SA, Batnagar, G, STREAMLINE COLON Investigators, STREAMLINE LUNG Investigators, METRIC Investigators, Di Ruffano, LF, Seedat, F, Clarke, A, Byron, S, Nixon, F, Albrow, R, Walker, T, Deakin, C, Zhelev, Z, Hunt, H, Yang, Y, Abel, L, Buchanan, J, Fanshawe, T, Shinkins, B, Wynants, L, Verbakel, J, Van Huffel, S, Timmerman, D, Van Calster, B, Zwinderman, A, Oke, J, O'Sullivan, J, Perera, R, Nicholson, B, Bromley, HL, Roberts, TE, Francis, A, Petrie, D, Mann, GB, Malottki, K, Smith, H, Billingham, L, Sitch, A, Gerke, O, Holm-Vilstrup, M, Segtnan, EA, Halekoh, U, Høilund-Carlsen, PF, Francq, BG, Dinnes, J, Parkes, J, Gregory, W, Hewison, J, Altman, D, Rosenberg, W, Selby, P, Asselineau, J, Perez, P, Paye, A, Bessede, E, Proust-Lima, C, Naaktgeboren, C, de Groot, J, Rutjes, A, Reitsma, J, Ogundimu, E, Cook, J, Le Manach, Y, Vergouwe, Y, Pajouheshnia, R, Groenwold, R, Peelen, L, Nieboer, D, De Cock, B, Pencina, MJ, Steyerberg, EW, Cooper, J, Parsons, N, Stinton, C, Smith, S, Dickens, A, Jordan, R, Enocson, A, Fitzmaurice, D, Adab, P, Boachie, C, Vidmar, G, Freeman, K, Connock, M, Court, R, Moons, C, Harris, J, Mumford, A, Plummer, Z, Lee, K, Reeves, B, Rogers, C, Verheyden, V, Angelini, GD, Murphy, GJ, Huddy, J, Ni, M, Good, K, Cooke, G, Hanna, G, Ma, J, Moons, KGMC, de Groot, JAH, Altman, DG, Reitsma, JB, Collins, GS, Moons, KGM, Kamarudin, AN, Kolamunnage-Dona, R, Cox, T, Borsci, S, Pérez, T, Pardo, MC, Candela-Toha, A, Muriel, A, Zamora, J, Sanghera, S, Mohiuddin, S, Martin, R, Donovan, J, Coast, J, Seo, MK, Cairns, J, Mitchell, E, Smith, A, Wright, J, Hall, P, Messenger, M, Calder, N, Wickramasekera, N, Vinall-Collier, K, Lewington, A, Damen, J, Cairns, D, Hutchinson, M, Sturgeon, C, Mitchel, L, Kift, R, Christakoudi, S, Rungall, M, Mobillo, P, Montero, R, Tsui, T-L, Kon, SP, Tucker, B, Sacks, S, Farmer, C, Strom, T, Chowdhury, P, Rebollo-Mesa, I, Hernandez-Fuentes, M, Damen, JAAG, Debray, TPA, Heus, P, Hooft, L, Scholten, RJPM, Schuit, E, Tzoulaki, I, Lassale, CM, Siontis, GCM, Chiocchia, V, Roberts, C, Schlüssel, MM, Gerry, S, Black, JA, van der Schouw, YT, Peelen, LM, Spence, G, McCartney, D, van den Bruel, A, Lasserson, D, Hayward, G, Vach, W, de Jong, A, Burggraaff, C, Hoekstra, O, Zijlstra, J, de Vet, H, Graziadio, S, Allen, J, Johnston, L, O'Leary, R, Power, M, Johnson, L, Waters, R, Simpson, J, Fanshawe, TR, Phillips, P, Plumb, A, Helbren, E, Halligan, S, Gale, A, Sekula, P, Sauerbrei, W, Forman, JR, Dutton, SJ, Takwoingi, Y, Hensor, EM, Nichols, TE, Kempf, E, Porcher, R, de Beyer, J, Hopewell, S, Dennis, J, Shields, B, Jones, A, Henley, W, Pearson, E, Hattersley, A, MASTERMIND consortium, Scheibler, F, Rummer, A, Sturtz, S, Großelfinger, R, Banister, K, Ramsay, C, Azuara-Blanco, A, Burr, J, Kumarasamy, M, Bourne, R, Uchegbu, I, Murphy, J, Carter, A, Marti, J, Eatock, J, Robotham, J, Dudareva, M, Gilchrist, M, Holmes, A, Monaghan, P, Lord, S, StJohn, A, Sandberg, S, Cobbaert, C, Lennartz, L, Verhagen-Kamerbeek, W, Ebert, C, Horvath, A, Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Jenniskens, K, Peters, J, Grigore, B, Ukoumunne, O, Levis, B, Benedetti, A, Levis, AW, Ioannidis, JPA, Shrier, I, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Kloda, LA, McMillan, D, Patten, SB, Steele, RJ, Ziegelstein, RC, Bombardier, CH, Osório, FDL, Fann, JR, Gjerdingen, D, Lamers, F, Lotrakul, M, Loureiro, SR, Löwe, B, Shaaban, J, Stafford, L, van Weert, HCPM, Whooley, MA, Williams, LS, Wittkampf, KA, Yeung, AS, Thombs, BD, Cooper, C, Nieto, T, Smith, C, Tucker, O, Dretzke, J, Beggs, A, Rai, N, Bayliss, S, Stevens, S, Mallet, S, Sundar, S, Hall, E, Porta, N, Estelles, DL, de Bono, J, CTC-STOP protocol development group, Gopalakrishna, G, Langendam, M, Scholten, R, Bossuyt, P, Leeflang, M, Noel-Storr, A, Thomas, J, Marshall, I, Wallace, B, Whiting, P, Davenport, C, GopalaKrishna, G, de Salis, I, Mallett, S, Wolff, R, Riley, R, Westwood, M, Kleinen, J, Collins, G, Reitsma, H, Moons, K, Zapf, A, Hoyer, A, Kramer, K, Kuss, O, Ensor, J, Deeks, JJ, Martin, EC, Riley, RD, Rücker, G, Steinhauser, S, Schumacher, M, Snell, K, Willis, B, Debray, T, Deeks, J, di Ruffano, LF, Taylor-Phillips, S, Hyde, C, Taylor, SA, Batnagar, G, STREAMLINE COLON Investigators, STREAMLINE LUNG Investigators, METRIC Investigators, Di Ruffano, LF, Seedat, F, Clarke, A, Byron, S, Nixon, F, Albrow, R, Walker, T, Deakin, C, Zhelev, Z, Hunt, H, Yang, Y, Abel, L, Buchanan, J, Fanshawe, T, Shinkins, B, Wynants, L, Verbakel, J, Van Huffel, S, Timmerman, D, Van Calster, B, Zwinderman, A, Oke, J, O'Sullivan, J, Perera, R, Nicholson, B, Bromley, HL, Roberts, TE, Francis, A, Petrie, D, Mann, GB, Malottki, K, Smith, H, Billingham, L, Sitch, A, Gerke, O, Holm-Vilstrup, M, Segtnan, EA, Halekoh, U, Høilund-Carlsen, PF, Francq, BG, Dinnes, J, Parkes, J, Gregory, W, Hewison, J, Altman, D, Rosenberg, W, Selby, P, Asselineau, J, Perez, P, Paye, A, Bessede, E, Proust-Lima, C, Naaktgeboren, C, de Groot, J, Rutjes, A, Reitsma, J, Ogundimu, E, Cook, J, Le Manach, Y, Vergouwe, Y, Pajouheshnia, R, Groenwold, R, Peelen, L, Nieboer, D, De Cock, B, Pencina, MJ, Steyerberg, EW, Cooper, J, Parsons, N, Stinton, C, Smith, S, Dickens, A, Jordan, R, Enocson, A, Fitzmaurice, D, Adab, P, Boachie, C, Vidmar, G, Freeman, K, Connock, M, Court, R, Moons, C, Harris, J, Mumford, A, Plummer, Z, Lee, K, Reeves, B, Rogers, C, Verheyden, V, Angelini, GD, Murphy, GJ, Huddy, J, Ni, M, Good, K, Cooke, G, Hanna, G, Ma, J, Moons, KGMC, de Groot, JAH, Altman, DG, Reitsma, JB, Collins, GS, Moons, KGM, Kamarudin, AN, Kolamunnage-Dona, R, Cox, T, Borsci, S, Pérez, T, Pardo, MC, Candela-Toha, A, Muriel, A, Zamora, J, Sanghera, S, Mohiuddin, S, Martin, R, Donovan, J, Coast, J, Seo, MK, Cairns, J, Mitchell, E, Smith, A, Wright, J, Hall, P, Messenger, M, Calder, N, Wickramasekera, N, Vinall-Collier, K, Lewington, A, Damen, J, Cairns, D, Hutchinson, M, Sturgeon, C, Mitchel, L, Kift, R, Christakoudi, S, Rungall, M, Mobillo, P, Montero, R, Tsui, T-L, Kon, SP, Tucker, B, Sacks, S, Farmer, C, Strom, T, Chowdhury, P, Rebollo-Mesa, I, Hernandez-Fuentes, M, Damen, JAAG, Debray, TPA, Heus, P, Hooft, L, Scholten, RJPM, Schuit, E, Tzoulaki, I, Lassale, CM, Siontis, GCM, Chiocchia, V, Roberts, C, Schlüssel, MM, Gerry, S, Black, JA, van der Schouw, YT, Peelen, LM, Spence, G, McCartney, D, van den Bruel, A, Lasserson, D, Hayward, G, Vach, W, de Jong, A, Burggraaff, C, Hoekstra, O, Zijlstra, J, de Vet, H, Graziadio, S, Allen, J, Johnston, L, O'Leary, R, Power, M, Johnson, L, Waters, R, Simpson, J, Fanshawe, TR, Phillips, P, Plumb, A, Helbren, E, Halligan, S, Gale, A, Sekula, P, Sauerbrei, W, Forman, JR, Dutton, SJ, Takwoingi, Y, Hensor, EM, Nichols, TE, Kempf, E, Porcher, R, de Beyer, J, Hopewell, S, Dennis, J, Shields, B, Jones, A, Henley, W, Pearson, E, Hattersley, A, MASTERMIND consortium, Scheibler, F, Rummer, A, Sturtz, S, Großelfinger, R, Banister, K, Ramsay, C, Azuara-Blanco, A, Burr, J, Kumarasamy, M, Bourne, R, Uchegbu, I, Murphy, J, Carter, A, Marti, J, Eatock, J, Robotham, J, Dudareva, M, Gilchrist, M, Holmes, A, Monaghan, P, Lord, S, StJohn, A, Sandberg, S, Cobbaert, C, Lennartz, L, Verhagen-Kamerbeek, W, Ebert, C, Horvath, A, Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Jenniskens, K, Peters, J, Grigore, B, Ukoumunne, O, Levis, B, Benedetti, A, Levis, AW, Ioannidis, JPA, Shrier, I, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Kloda, LA, McMillan, D, Patten, SB, Steele, RJ, Ziegelstein, RC, Bombardier, CH, Osório, FDL, Fann, JR, Gjerdingen, D, Lamers, F, Lotrakul, M, Loureiro, SR, Löwe, B, Shaaban, J, Stafford, L, van Weert, HCPM, Whooley, MA, Williams, LS, Wittkampf, KA, Yeung, AS, Thombs, BD, Cooper, C, Nieto, T, Smith, C, Tucker, O, Dretzke, J, Beggs, A, Rai, N, Bayliss, S, Stevens, S, Mallet, S, Sundar, S, Hall, E, Porta, N, Estelles, DL, de Bono, J, and CTC-STOP protocol development group
- Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s41512-016-0001-y.].
- Published
- 2017
10. Should weight loss programmes be designed differently for men and women? The ROMEO (Review Of MEn and Obesity) Project
- Author
-
Robertson, C., Avenell, S., Boachie, C., Stewart, F., Archibald, D., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, and Boyers, D.
- Published
- 2014
11. Should weight loss programmes be designed differently for men and women? The ROMEO Project
- Author
-
Robertson, C., primary, Avenell, A., additional, Boachie, C., additional, Stewart, F., additional, Archibald, D., additional, Douglas, F., additional, Hoddinott, P., additional, Van Teijlingen, E., additional, and Boyers, D., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation
- Author
-
Mowatt, G., Scotland, G., Boachie, C., Cruickshank, M., Ford, J.A., Fraser, C., Kurban, L., Lam, T.B., Padhani, A.R., Royle, J., Scheenen, T.W.J., Tassie, E., Mowatt, G., Scotland, G., Boachie, C., Cruickshank, M., Ford, J.A., Fraser, C., Kurban, L., Lam, T.B., Padhani, A.R., Royle, J., Scheenen, T.W.J., and Tassie, E.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 126103.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), In the UK, prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in men. A diagnosis can be confirmed only following a prostate biopsy. Many men find themselves with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a negative biopsy. The best way to manage these men remains uncertain.To assess the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques [dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI)] and the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strategies involving their use in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsy who remain clinically suspicious for harbouring malignancy.Databases searched--MEDLINE (1946 to March 2012), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (March 2012), EMBASE (1980 to March 2012), Bioscience Information Service (BIOSIS; 1995 to March 2012), Science Citation Index (SCI; 1995 to March 2012), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3 2012), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE; March 2012), Medion (March 2012) and Health Technology Assessment database (March 2012).Types of studies: direct studies/randomised controlled trials reporting diagnostic outcomes. Index tests: MRS, DCE-MRI and DW-MRI. Comparators: T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2-MRI), transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS/Bx). Reference standard: histopathological assessment of biopsied tissue. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative MRS/MRI sequences to direct TRUS-guided biopsies compared with systematic extended-cores TRUS-guided biopsies. A health service provider perspective was adopted and the recommended 3.5\% discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes.A total of 51 studies were included. In pooled estimates, sensitivity [95\% confidence interval (CI)] was highest for MRS (92\%; 95\% CI 86\% to 95\%). Specificity was highest for TRUS (imaging test) (81\%; 95
- Published
- 2013
13. Dietary interventions for weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction in people of African ancestry (blacks): a systematic review.
- Author
-
Osei-Assibey G, Boachie C, Osei-Assibey, G, and Boachie, C
- Abstract
Objective: To systematically review weight and cardiovascular risk reduction in blacks by diet and lifestyle changes.Design: Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials of diet with/without lifestyle changes with duration of intervention ≥3 months, and published between January 1990 and December 2009, were searched in electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CCTR (Cochrane Controlled Trials Register). Studies were included if they reported weight/BMI changes with changes in at least one of the following: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma lipids and glucose, and glycated haemoglobin.Setting: Clinical, community and church-based interventions.Subjects: Study participants were of African ancestry (blacks).Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Average mean difference in weight loss was -2·66 kg, with improvements in all outcomes except total cholesterol. No significant difference was observed in outcome measures between all studies and studies that recruited only healthy participants or patients with type 2 diabetes.Conclusions: Diet and lifestyle changes result in weight loss with improvements in cardiovascular risk factors in blacks. However, more culturally tailored programmes have been suggested to motivate and encourage blacks to participate in intervention trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial)
- Author
-
Grant, AM, primary, Boachie, C, additional, Cotton, SC, additional, Faria, R, additional, Bojke, L, additional, Epstein, DM, additional, Ramsay, CR, additional, Corbacho, B, additional, Sculpher, M, additional, Krukowski, ZH, additional, Heading, RC, additional, and Campbell, MK, additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation
- Author
-
Mowatt, G, primary, Scotland, G, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Cruickshank, M, additional, Ford, JA, additional, Fraser, C, additional, Kurban, L, additional, Lam, TB, additional, Padhani, AR, additional, Royle, J, additional, Scheenen, TW, additional, and Tassie, E, additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalised adults requiring short-term catheterisation: multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of antimicrobial- and antiseptic-impregnated urethral catheters (the CATHETER trial)
- Author
-
Pickard, R, primary, Lam, T, additional, MacLennan, G, additional, Starr, K, additional, Kilonzo, M, additional, McPherson, G, additional, Gillies, K, additional, McDonald, A, additional, Walton, K, additional, Buckley, B, additional, Glazener, C, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Burr, J, additional, Norrie, J, additional, Vale, L, additional, Grant, A, additional, and N’Dow, J, additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Elucigene FH20 and LIPOchip for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
- Author
-
Sharma, P, primary, Boyers, D, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Stewart, F, additional, Miedzybrodzka, Z, additional, Simpson, W, additional, Kilonzo, M, additional, McNamee, P, additional, and Mowatt, G, additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.
- Author
-
Robertson, C, primary, Arcot Ragupathy, SK, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Dixon, JM, additional, Fraser, C, additional, Hernández, R, additional, Heys, S, additional, Jack, W, additional, Kerr, GR, additional, Lawrence, G, additional, MacLennan, G, additional, Maxwell, A, additional, McGregor, J, additional, Mowatt, G, additional, Pinder, S, additional, Ternent, L, additional, Thomas, RE, additional, Vale, L, additional, Wilson, R, additional, Zhu, S, additional, and Gilbert, FJ, additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials
- Author
-
Glazener, C, primary, Boachie, C, additional, Buckley, B, additional, Cochran, C, additional, Dorey, G, additional, Grant, A, additional, Hagen, S, additional, Kilonzo, M, additional, McDonald, A, additional, McPherson, G, additional, Moore, K, additional, N’Dow, J, additional, Norrie, J, additional, Ramsay, C, additional, and Vale, L, additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Dietary interventions for weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction in people of African ancestry (blacks): a systematic review
- Author
-
Osei-Assibey, G, primary and Boachie, C, additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of polyglactin (Vicryl) mesh, polydioxanone (PDS) or polyglactin (Vicryl) sutures for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: outcomes at 2 years
- Author
-
Madhuvrata, P., primary, Glazener, C., additional, Boachie, C., additional, Allahdin, S., additional, and Bain, C., additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Voiding dysfunction following suburethral tape
- Author
-
Madhuvrata, P., primary, Ford, J., additional, Merrick, K., additional, Boachie, C., additional, and Abdel-Fattah, M., additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Size matters: second breast cancer size following treatment for primary cancer as a predictor of survival
- Author
-
MacLennan, GS, primary, Lawrence, G, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Heys, SD, additional, and Gilbert, FJ, additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rapid point-of-care tests for the detection of genital chlamydia infection in women and men
- Author
-
Hislop, J, primary, Quayyum, Z, additional, Flett, G, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Fraser, C, additional, and Mowatt, G, additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis and urine biomarkers (FISH, ImmunoCyt, NMP22) and cytology for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer
- Author
-
Mowatt, G, primary, Zhu, S, additional, Kilonzo, M, additional, Boachie, C, additional, Fraser, C, additional, Griffiths, TRL, additional, N'Dow, J, additional, Nabi, G, additional, Cook, J, additional, and Vale, L, additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Romiplostim for the treatment of chronic immune or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a single technology appraisal
- Author
-
Mowatt, G, primary, Boachie, C, additional, Crowther, M, additional, Fraser, C, additional, Hernández, R, additional, Jia, X, additional, and Ternent, L, additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. 1011 PHOTODYNAMIC DIAGNOSIS OF BLADDER CANCER COMPARED WITH WHITE LIGHT CYSTOSCOPY
- Author
-
Mowatt, G., primary, N'Dow, J.M.O., additional, Shihua, Z., additional, Kilonzo, M., additional, Boachie, C., additional, Fraser, C., additional, Nabi, G., additional, Cook, J., additional, Vale, L., additional, and Griffiths, T.R.L., additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Surveillance mammography for detecting ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Robertson C, Ragupathy SK, Boachie C, Fraser C, Heys SD, Maclennan G, Mowatt G, Thomas RE, Gilbert FJ, and the Mammographic Surveillance Health Technology Assessment Group, Robertson, Clare, Ragupathy, Senthil Kumar Arcot, Boachie, Charles, Fraser, Cynthia, Heys, Steve D, Maclennan, Graeme, Mowatt, Graham, Thomas, Ruth E, Gilbert, Fiona J, and Mammographic Surveillance Health Technology Assessment Group
- Abstract
Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of surveillance mammography for detecting ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer in women previously treated for primary breast cancer.Methods: A systematic review of surveillance mammography compared with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specialist-led clinical examination or unstructured primary care follow-up, using histopathological assessment for test positives and follow-up for test negatives as the reference standard.Results: Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Variations in study comparisons precluded meta-analysis. For routine ipsilateral breast tumour detection, surveillance mammography sensitivity ranged from 64-67% and specificity ranged from 85-97%. For MRI, sensitivity ranged from 86-100% and specificity was 93%. For non-routine ipsilateral breast tumour detection, sensitivity and specificity for surveillance mammography ranged from 50-83% and 57-75% and for MRI 93-100% and 88-96%. For routine metachronous contralateral breast cancer detection, one study reported sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 50% for both surveillance mammography and MRI.Conclusion: Although mammography is associated with high sensitivity and specificity, MRI is the most accurate test for detecting ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer in women previously treated for primary breast cancer. Results should be interpreted with caution because of the limited evidence base. Key Points • Surveillance mammography is associated with high sensitivity and specificity • Findings suggest that MRI is the most accurate test for detecting further breast cancer • Robust conclusions cannot be made due to the limited evidence base • Further research comparing surveillance mammography and other diagnostic tests is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Kurzdarstellung aktueller publikationen
- Author
-
Pickard, R., Starr, K., Graeme MacLennan, Lam, T., Thomas, R., Burr, J., Mcpherson, G., Mcdonald, A., Anson, K., Dow, James N., Burgess, N., Clark, T., Mary Kilonzo, Katie Gillies, Shearer, K., Boachie, C., Cameron, S., Norrie, J., and Mcclinton, S.
30. A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design
- Author
-
Cook, JA, Elders, A, Boachie, C, Bassinga, T, Fraser, C, Altman, DG, Boutron, I, Ramsay, CR, and MacLennan, GS
- Subjects
Randomised controlled trial ,Trial design ,Methodology ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Expertise ,Research Personnel ,Expertise-based ,Research Design ,Systematic review ,Learning ,Humans ,Surgery ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Non-pharmacological interventions ,Clinical Competence ,Learning Curve ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - Abstract
Background Under a conventional two-arm randomised trial design, participants are allocated to an intervention and participating health professionals are expected to deliver both interventions. However, health professionals often have differing levels of expertise in a skill-based interventions such as surgery or psychotherapy. An expertise-based approach to trial design, where health professionals only deliver an intervention in which they have expertise, has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this project was to systematically review the use of an expertise-based trial design in the medical literature. Methods We carried out a comprehensive search of nine databases—AMED, BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane Methodology Register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, and PsycINFO—from 1966 to 2012 and performed citation searches using the ISI Citation Indexes and Scopus. Studies that used an expertise-based trial design were included. Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reports. Data were extracted and summarised on the study characteristics, general and expertise-specific study methodology, and conduct. Results In total, 7476 titles and abstracts were identified, leading to 43 included studies (54 articles). The vast majority (88 %) used a pure expertise-based design; three (7 %) adopted a hybrid design, and two (5 %) used a design that was unclear. Most studies compared substantially different interventions (79 %). In many cases, key information relating to the expertise-based design was absent; only 12 (28 %) reported criteria for delivering both interventions. Most studies recruited the target sample size or very close to it (median of 101, interquartile range of 94 to 118), although the target was reported for only 40 % of studies. The proportion of participants who received the allocated intervention was high (92 %, interquartile range of 82 to 99 %). Conclusions While use of an expertise-based trial design is growing, it remains uncommon. Reporting of study methodology and, particularly, expertise-related methodology was poor. Empirical evidence provided some support for purported benefits such as high levels of recruitment and compliance with allocation. An expertise-based trial design should be considered but its value seems context-specific, particularly when interventions differ substantially or interventions are typically delivered by different health professionals. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0739-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Should weight loss and maintenance programmes be designed differently for men? A systematic review of long-term randomised controlled trials presenting data for men and women: The ROMEO project.
- Author
-
Robertson, C., Avenell, A., Boachie, C., Stewart, F., Archibald, D., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, Boyers, D., Robertson, C., Avenell, A., Boachie, C., Stewart, F., Archibald, D., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, and Boyers, D.
- Abstract
We systematically reviewed the randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence for long-term (≥12 months) weight management interventions for obese men in contrast to women to help understand whether programmes should be designed differently for men. We searched 11 databases up to October 2014. Twenty-two RCTs reported data separately for men and women in weight loss or weight maintenance interventions. We found men were under-represented in RCTs of weight loss interventions open to both sexes. Men comprised 36% of participants (4771 from 13,305 participants). Despite this, men were 11% (95% CI 8-14%, p<0.001) more likely to be trial completers compared to women. The trials did not report service user consultation and none were designed to investigate whether men and women responded differently to given interventions. Our meta-analysis of 13 trials showed no significant difference in weight loss between men and women, either for weight loss in kg (p=0.90) or percentage weight loss (p=0.78), although men tended to lose more weight with intensive low fat reducing diets, with or without meal replacements, and structured physical activity/exercise programmes than women. Orlistat was less beneficial for men for weight maintenance. Individual support and tailoring appeared more helpful for men than women. We found evidence that men and women respond differently to, and have different preferences for, varying types of weight management programme. We suggest that it is important to understand men's views on weight loss, as this is likely to also improve the uptake and effectiveness of programmes for men.
32. Sex can affect participation, engagement, and adherence in trials.
- Author
-
Avenell, A., Robertson, C., Stewart, F., Boyers, D., Douglas, F., Archibald, D., van Teijlingen, Edwin, Hoddinott, P., Boachie, C., Avenell, A., Robertson, C., Stewart, F., Boyers, D., Douglas, F., Archibald, D., van Teijlingen, Edwin, Hoddinott, P., and Boachie, C.
33. Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men.
- Author
-
Robertson, C., Archibald, D., Avenell, A., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, Boyers, D., Stewart, F., Boachie, C., Fioratou, E., Wilkins, D., Street, T., Carroll, P., Fowler, C., Robertson, C., Archibald, D., Avenell, A., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, Boyers, D., Stewart, F., Boachie, C., Fioratou, E., Wilkins, D., Street, T., Carroll, P., and Fowler, C.
- Abstract
Obesity increases the risk of many serious illnesses such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis. More men than women are overweight or obese in the UK but men are less likely to perceive their weight as a problem and less likely to engage with weight-loss services.
34. Should weight loss programmes be designed differently for men and women? The ROMEO (Review Of MEn and Obesity) Project
- Author
-
Robertson, C., Avenell, S., Boachie, C., Stewart, F., Archibald, D., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, Boyers, D., Robertson, C., Avenell, S., Boachie, C., Stewart, F., Archibald, D., Douglas, F., Hoddinott, P., van Teijlingen, Edwin, and Boyers, D.
35. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX)
- Author
-
Grant, A M, Cotton, S C, Boachie, C, Ramsay, C R, Krukowski, Z H, Heading, R C, and Campbell, M K
- Abstract
ObjectivesTo determine the long term clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication as an alternative to drug treatment for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).DesignFive year follow-up of multicentre, pragmatic randomised trial (with parallel non-randomised preference groups).SettingInitial recruitment in 21 UK hospitals.ParticipantsResponders to annual questionnaires among 810 original participants. At entry, all had had GORD for >12 months.InterventionThe surgeon chose the type of fundoplication. Medical therapy was reviewed and optimised by a specialist. Subsequent management was at the discretion of the clinician responsible for care, usually in primary care.Main outcome measuresPrimary outcome measure was self reported quality of life score on disease-specific REFLUX questionnaire. Other measures were health status (with SF-36 and EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaires), use of antireflux medication, and complications.ResultsBy five years, 63% (112/178) of patients randomised to surgery and 13% (24/179) of those randomised to medical management had received a fundoplication (plus 85% (222/261) and 3% (6/192) of those who expressed a preference for surgery and for medical management). Among responders at 5 years, 44% (56/127) of those randomised to surgery were taking antireflux medication versus 82% (98/119) of those randomised to medical management. Differences in the REFLUX score significantly favoured the randomised surgery group (mean difference 8.5 (95% CI 3.9 to 13.1), P<0.001, at five years). SF-36 and EQ-5D scores also favoured surgery, but were not statistically significant at five years. After fundoplication, 3% (12/364) had surgical treatment for a complication and 4% (16) had subsequent reflux-related operations—most often revision of the wrap. Long term rates of dysphagia, flatulence, and inability to vomit were similar in the two randomised groups.ConclusionsAfter five years, laparoscopic fundoplication continued to provide better relief of GORD symptoms than medical management. Adverse effects of surgery were uncommon and generally observed soon after surgery. A small proportion had re-operations. There was no evidence of long term adverse symptoms caused by surgery.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN15517081.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterisation in hospital: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G, Starr K, Kilonzo M, McPherson G, Gillies K, McDonald A, Walton K, Buckley B, Glazener C, Boachie C, Burr J, Norrie J, Vale L, Grant A, N'Dow J, Pickard, Robert, Lam, Thomas, and MacLennan, Graeme
- Abstract
Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a major preventable cause of harm for patients in hospital. We aimed to establish whether short-term routine use of antimicrobial catheters reduced risk of CAUTI compared with standard polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) catheterisation.Methods: In our parallel, three group, multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥16 years) requiring short-term (≤14 days) catheterisation at 24 hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1:1 with a remote computer allocation to receive a silver alloy-coated catheter, a nitrofural-impregnated catheter, or a PTFE-coated catheter (control group). Patients undergoing unplanned catheterisation were also included and consent for participation was obtained retrospectively. Participants and trial staff were unmasked to treatment assignment. Data were collected by trial staff and by patient-reported questionnaires for 6 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome was incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection for which an antibiotic was prescribed by 6 weeks. We postulated that a 3·3% absolute reduction in CAUTI would represent sufficient benefit to recommend routine use of antimicrobial catheters. This study is registered, number ISRCTN75198618.Findings: 708 (10%) of 7102 randomly allocated participants were not catheterised, did not confirm consent, or withdrew, and were not included in the primary analyses. Compared with 271 (12·6%) of 2144 participants in the control group, 263 (12·5%) of 2097 participants allocated a silver alloy catheter had the primary outcome (difference -0·1% [95% CI -2·4 to 2·2]), as did 228 (10·6%) of 2153 participants allocated a nitrofural catheter (-2·1% [-4·2 to 0·1]). Rates of catheter-related discomfort were higher in the nitrofural group than they were in the other groups.Interpretation: Silver alloy-coated catheters were not effective for reduction of incidence of symptomatic CAUTI. The reduction we noted in CAUTI associated with nitrofural-impregnated catheters was less than that regarded as clinically important. Routine use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters is not supported by this trial.Funding: UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Examining the impact of personal freedom on income inequality: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa and Western European regions.
- Author
-
Ohene Kwatia B, Amewu G, and Boachie C
- Subjects
- Africa South of the Sahara, Humans, Europe, Freedom, Income, Socioeconomic Factors
- Abstract
Rising income inequality has recently garnered intensive attention owing to its significance in theory and practice. This has rendered the mechanism through which inequality can be understood, even from a microscopic perspective, to institute proper policies that curtail it important. We contribute to the literature by examining the effect of freedom on income inequality using data from 34 least-free and 18 most-free countries from 2000 to 2020 in Sub-Saharan Africa and Western Europe, respectively. A novel fixed-effects panel quantile regression econometric estimator was employed, and the findings showed a non-linear relationship between personal freedom and income inequality for both regions. Again, both regions reported an inverse relationship between personal freedom and income inequality within the medium-run quantiles. However, a positive relationship was reported in the short-run and long-run quantiles of Sub-Saharan Africa and Western Europe, respectively, whereas the inverse was the same. Finally, the significant adverse relationship was more dominant in Western Europe, implying that high levels of personal freedom in the region explain the low levels of income inequality compared to Sub-Saharan Africa, which has lower levels of personal freedom and higher income inequality. Concerning the findings, it is recommended that policymakers and governments of least- and most-free regions institutionalise personal liberties that support human capital development and establish mechanisms to implement enacted freedoms., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Ohene Kwatia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. To tolerate or to agree: A tutorial on tolerance intervals in method comparison studies with BivRegBLS R Package.
- Author
-
Francq BG, Berger M, and Boachie C
- Subjects
- Confidence Intervals, Humans, Probability
- Abstract
The well-known agreement interval by Bland and Altman is extensively applied in method comparison studies. Two clinical measurement methods are considered interchangeable if their differences are not clinically significant. The agreement interval is commonly applied to assess the spread of the differences. However, this interval is approximate (too narrow) and several authors propose calculating a confidence interval around each bound. This article demonstrates that this approach is misleading, awkward, and confusing. On the other hand, tolerance intervals are exact and can include a confidence level if needed. Tolerance intervals are also easier to calculate and to interpret. Real data sets are used to illustrate the tolerance intervals with the R package BivRegBLS under normal or log-normal assumptions. Furthermore, it is also explained how to assess the coverage probabilities of the tolerance intervals with simulations., (© 2020 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Cardiac Troponin T and Troponin I in the General Population.
- Author
-
Welsh P, Preiss D, Hayward C, Shah ASV, McAllister D, Briggs A, Boachie C, McConnachie A, Padmanabhan S, Welsh C, Woodward M, Campbell A, Porteous D, Mills NL, and Sattar N
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases diagnosis, Cardiovascular Diseases mortality, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Scotland epidemiology, Time Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases blood, Cardiovascular Diseases genetics, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Troponin I blood, Troponin I genetics, Troponin T blood, Troponin T genetics
- Abstract
Background: There is great interest in widening the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins for population cardiovascular disease (CVD) and heart failure screening. However, it is not clear whether cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) are equivalent measures of risk in this setting. We aimed to compare and contrast (1) the association of cTnT and cTnI with CVD and non-CVD outcomes, and (2) their determinants in a genome-wide association study., Methods: High-sensitivity cTnT and cTnI were measured in serum from 19 501 individuals in Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (quartile 1 to quartile 3, 7.1-9.2). Associations of each troponin with a composite CVD outcome (1177 events), CVD death (n=266), non-CVD death (n=374), and heart failure (n=216) were determined by using Cox models. A genome-wide association study was conducted using a standard approach developed for the cohort., Results: Both cTnI and cTnT were strongly associated with CVD risk in unadjusted models. After adjusting for classical risk factors, the hazard ratio for a 1 SD increase in log transformed troponin was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.17-1.32) and 1.11 (1.04-1.19) for cTnI and cTnT, respectively; ratio of hazard ratios 1.12 (1.04-1.21). cTnI, but not cTnT, was associated with myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease. Both cTnI and cTnT had strong associations with CVD death and heart failure. By contrast, cTnT, but not cTnI, was associated with non-CVD death; ratio of hazard ratios 0.77 (0.67-0.88). We identified 5 loci (53 individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms) that had genome-wide significant associations with cTnI, and a different set of 4 loci (4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms) for cTnT., Conclusions: The upstream genetic causes of low-grade elevations in cTnI and cTnT appear distinct, and their associations with outcomes also differ. Elevations in cTnI are more strongly associated with some CVD outcomes, whereas cTnT is more strongly associated with the risk of non-CVD death. These findings help inform the selection of an optimal troponin assay for future clinical care and research in this setting.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Metabolomic consequences of genetic inhibition of PCSK9 compared with statin treatment.
- Author
-
Sliz E, Kettunen J, Holmes MV, Williams CO, Boachie C, Wang Q, Männikkö M, Sebert S, Walters R, Lin K, Millwood IY, Clarke R, Li L, Rankin N, Welsh P, Delles C, Jukema JW, Trompet S, Ford I, Perola M, Salomaa V, Järvelin MR, Chen Z, Lawlor DA, Ala-Korpela M, Danesh J, Davey Smith G, Sattar N, Butterworth A, and Würtz P
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amino Acids analysis, Amino Acids metabolism, Cardiovascular Diseases genetics, Cardiovascular Diseases pathology, Cholesterol, LDL blood, Cholesterol, VLDL blood, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Placebo Effect, Pravastatin therapeutic use, Proprotein Convertase 9 genetics, Cardiovascular Diseases drug therapy, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Metabolomics methods, Proprotein Convertase 9 metabolism
- Abstract
Background: Both statins and PCSK9 inhibitors lower blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to reduce risk of cardiovascular events. To assess potential differences between metabolic effects of these two lipid-lowering therapies, we performed detailed lipid and metabolite profiling of a large randomized statin trial and compared the results with the effects of genetic inhibition of PCSK9, acting as a naturally occurring trial., Methods: 228 circulating metabolic measures were quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, including lipoprotein subclass concentrations and their lipid composition, fatty acids, and amino acids, for 5,359 individuals (2,659 on treatment) in the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) trial at 6-months post-randomization. The corresponding metabolic measures were analyzed in eight population cohorts (N=72,185) using PCSK9 rs11591147 as an unconfounded proxy to mimic the therapeutic effects of PCSK9 inhibitors., Results: Scaled to an equivalent lowering of LDL-C, the effects of genetic inhibition of PCSK9 on 228 metabolic markers were generally consistent with those of statin therapy ( R =0.88). Alterations in lipoprotein lipid composition and fatty acid distribution were similar. However, discrepancies were observed for very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) lipid measures. For instance, genetic inhibition of PCSK9 had weaker effects on lowering of VLDL-cholesterol compared with statin therapy (54% vs. 77% reduction, relative to the lowering effect on LDL-C;
2 =0.88). Alterations in lipoprotein lipid composition and fatty acid distribution were similar. However, discrepancies were observed for very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) lipid measures. For instance, genetic inhibition of PCSK9 had weaker effects on lowering of VLDL-cholesterol compared with statin therapy (54% vs. 77% reduction, relative to the lowering effect on LDL-C; P =2x10-7 for heterogeneity). Genetic inhibition of PCSK9 showed no significant effects on amino acids, ketones, or a marker of inflammation (GlycA) whereas statin treatment weakly lowered GlycA levels., Conclusions: Genetic inhibition of PCSK9 had similar metabolic effects to statin therapy on detailed lipid and metabolite profiles. However, PCSK9 inhibitors are predicted to have weaker effects on VLDL lipids compared with statins for an equivalent lowering of LDL-C, which potentially translate into smaller reductions in cardiovascular disease risk., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosures PW is employee and shareholder of Nightingale Health Ltd, a company offering NMR based metabolic profiling. JK reports stock options in Nightingale Health. The Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (MVH, RW, KL, IM, RC, ZC) has received research grants from Abbott/Solvay/Mylan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Schering. MVH has collaborated with Boehringer Ingelheim in research, and in accordance with the policy of the Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (University of Oxford), did not accept any personal payment. VS has received a conference trip and an honorarium from Novo Nordisk. DAL has received support from several government and charity health research funders and from Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic for research unrelated to that published here. NS has consulted or been on the speaker bureau for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novo Nordisk and Eli-Lilly. He has also received funding from Boehringer Ingelheim. ASB has received grants from Merck, Pfizer, Biogen, Bioverativ and AstraZeneca. No other authors reported disclosures.- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Comparison between High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T and Cardiac Troponin I in a Large General Population Cohort.
- Author
-
Welsh P, Preiss D, Shah ASV, McAllister D, Briggs A, Boachie C, McConnachie A, Hayward C, Padmanabhan S, Welsh C, Woodward M, Campbell A, Porteous D, Mills NL, and Sattar N
- Subjects
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Biomarkers blood, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Scotland, Sex Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases blood, Troponin I blood, Troponin T blood
- Abstract
Background: Few data compare cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in a general population. We sought to evaluate the distribution and association between cTnT, cTnI, and cardiovascular risk factors in a large general population cohort., Methods: High-sensitivity cTnT and cTnI were measured in serum from 19501 individuals in the Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study. Associations with cardiovascular risk factors were compared using age- and sex-adjusted regression. Observed age- and sex-stratified 99th centiles were compared with 99th centiles for cTnT (men, 15.5 ng/L; women, 9.0 ng/L) and cTnI (men, 34.2 ng/L; women, 15.6 ng/L) used in clinical practice., Results: cTnT and cTnI concentrations were detectable in 53.3% and 74.8% of participants, respectively, and were modestly correlated in unadjusted analyses ( R
2 = 21.3%) and only weakly correlated after adjusting for age and sex ( R2 = 9.5%). Cardiovascular risk factors were associated with both troponins, but in age- and sex-adjusted analyses, cTnI was more strongly associated with age, male sex, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure ( P < 0.0001 for all vs cTnT). cTnT was more strongly associated with diabetes ( P < 0.0001 vs cTnI). The observed 99th centiles were broadly consistent with recommended 99th centiles in younger men and women. After the age of 60 years, observed 99th centiles increased substantially for cTnT, and beyond 70 years of age, the 99th centiles approximately doubled for both troponins., Conclusions: In the general population, cTnT and cTnI concentrations are weakly correlated and are differentially associated with cardiovascular risk factors. The 99th centiles currently in use are broadly appropriate for men and women up to but not beyond the age of 60 years., (© 2018 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Gaining an advantage by sitting an OSCE after your peers: A retrospective study.
- Author
-
Ghouri A, Boachie C, McDowall S, Parle J, Ditchfield CA, McConnachie A, Walters MR, and Ghouri N
- Subjects
- Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Scotland, Young Adult, Educational Measurement methods, Educational Measurement statistics & numerical data, Students, Medical statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Purpose: To investigate if final year medical students undertaking an OSCE station at a later stage during examination diet were advantaged over their peers who undertook the same station at an earlier stage, and whether any such effect varies by the student's relative academic standing. Methods: OSCE data from six consecutive final year cohorts totaling 1505 students was analyzed. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to model factors associated with the probability of passing each individual station (random effects for students and circuits; and fixed effects to assess the association with day of examination, time of day, gender and year). Results: Weaker students were more likely to pass if they took their OSCE later in the examination period. The odds of passing a station increased daily by 20%. Overall, the mean number of stations passed by each student increased over the 5 days. Conclusions: Students undertaking the same OSCE stations later in examination period statistically had higher chances of passing compared to their peers, and the weaker students appear to be particularly advantaged. These findings have major implications for OSCE design, to ensure students are not advantaged by examination timing, and weaker students are not "passing in error".
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Response to: Is there such a thing as a fair OSCE?
- Author
-
Ghouri A, Boachie C, McDowall S, Parle J, Ditchfield CA, McConnachie A, Walters MR, and Ghouri N
- Subjects
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Response to: Response to: Gaining an advantage by sitting an OSCE after your peers: A retrospective study.
- Author
-
Ghouri A, Boachie C, McDowall S, Parle J, Ditchfield CA, McConnachie A, Walters MR, and Ghouri N
- Subjects
- Educational Measurement, Peer Group, Retrospective Studies, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Sitting Position
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study.
- Author
-
Virgili G, Michelessi M, Cook J, Boachie C, Burr J, Banister K, Garway-Heath DF, Bourne RRA, Asorey Garcia A, Ramsay CR, and Azuara-Blanco A
- Subjects
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Diagnostic Tests, Routine standards, Humans, Intraocular Pressure physiology, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers pathology, Prospective Studies, Retinal Ganglion Cells pathology, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological standards, Diagnostic Tests, Routine methods, Glaucoma diagnosis, Tomography, Optical Coherence methods
- Abstract
Background/aims: To assess the diagnostic performance of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) data of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting glaucoma., Methods: Secondary analyses of a prospective, multicentre diagnostic study (Glaucoma Automated Tests Evaluation (GATE)) referred to hospital eye services in the UK were conducted. We included data from 899 of 966 participants referred to hospital eye services with suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension. We used both eyes' data and logistic regression-based receiver operator characteristics analysis to build a set of models to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the average and inferior quadrant RNFL thickness data of OCT. The reference standard was expert clinician examination including automated perimetry. The main outcome measures were sensitivity at 0.95 specificity and specificity at 0.95 sensitivity and the corresponding RNFL thickness thresholds. We explored the possibility of accuracy improvement by adding measures of within-eye and between-eye variation, scan quality, intraocular pressure (IOP) and age., Results: Glaucoma was diagnosed in at least one eye in 17% of participants. Areas under the curve were between 0.83 and 0.88. When specificity was fixed at 0.95, the sensitivity was between 0.38 and 0.55, and the highest values were reached with models including the inferior quadrant rather than the average RNFL thickness. Fixing sensitivity at 0.95, the specificity was between 0.36 and 0.58. The addition of age, refractive error, IOP or within-subject variation did not improve the accuracy., Conclusion: RNFL thickness data of OCT can be used as a diagnostic test, but accuracy estimates remain moderate even in exploratory multivariable modelling of aiming to improve accuracy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics identifies phenylalanine as a novel predictor of incident heart failure hospitalisation: results from PROSPER and FINRISK 1997.
- Author
-
Delles C, Rankin NJ, Boachie C, McConnachie A, Ford I, Kangas A, Soininen P, Trompet S, Mooijaart SP, Jukema JW, Zannad F, Ala-Korpela M, Salomaa V, Havulinna AS, Welsh P, Würtz P, and Sattar N
- Subjects
- Aged, Biomarkers blood, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure epidemiology, Heart Failure therapy, Humans, Incidence, Ireland epidemiology, Male, Netherlands epidemiology, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Scotland epidemiology, Time Factors, Heart Failure blood, Hospitalization trends, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy methods, Metabolomics methods, Phenylalanine blood, Risk Assessment methods
- Abstract
Aims: We investigated the association between quantified metabolite, lipid and lipoprotein measures and incident heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) in the elderly, and examined whether circulating metabolic measures improve HFH prediction., Methods and Results: Overall, 80 metabolic measures from the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) trial were measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (n = 5341; 182 HFH events during 2.7-year follow-up). We repeated the work in FINRISK 1997 (n = 7330; 133 HFH events during 5-year follow-up). In PROSPER, the circulating concentrations of 13 metabolic measures were found to be significantly different in those who were later hospitalised for heart failure after correction for multiple comparisons. These included creatinine, phenylalanine, glycoprotein acetyls, 3-hydroxybutyrate, and various high-density lipoprotein measures. In Cox models, two metabolites were associated with risk of HFH after adjustment for clinical risk factors and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP): phenylalanine [hazard ratio (HR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.53; P = 0.002] and acetate (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.98; P = 0.026). Both were retained in the final model after backward elimination. Compared to a model with established risk factors and NT-proBNP, this model did not improve the C-index but did improve the overall continuous net reclassification index (NRI 0.21; 95% CI 0.06-0.35; P = 0.007) due to improvement in classification of non-cases (NRI 0.14; 95% CI 0.12-0.17; P < 0.001). Phenylalanine was replicated as a predictor of HFH in FINRISK 1997 (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.48; P = 0.023)., Conclusion: Our findings identify phenylalanine as a novel predictor of incident HFH, although prediction gains are low. Further mechanistic studies appear warranted., (© 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.
- Author
-
Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Beale S, Boachie C, Duffy S, Fraser C, Harbour J, McCool R, and Smith L
- Subjects
- Humans, Qualitative Research, Surveys and Questionnaires, Databases, Bibliographic, Information Storage and Retrieval methods, Review Literature as Topic, Search Engine methods, Technology Assessment, Biomedical
- Abstract
Background: Effective study identification is essential for conducting health research, developing clinical guidance and health policy and supporting health-care decision-making. Methodological search filters (combinations of search terms to capture a specific study design) can assist in searching to achieve this., Objectives: This project investigated the methods used to assess the performance of methodological search filters, the information that searchers require when choosing search filters and how that information could be better provided., Methods: Five literature reviews were undertaken in 2010/11: search filter development and testing; comparison of search filters; decision-making in choosing search filters; diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) study methods; and decision-making in choosing diagnostic tests. We conducted interviews and a questionnaire with experienced searchers to learn what information assists in the choice of search filters and how filters are used. These investigations informed the development of various approaches to gathering and reporting search filter performance data. We acknowledge that there has been a regrettable delay between carrying out the project, including the searches, and the publication of this report, because of serious illness of the principal investigator., Results: The development of filters most frequently involved using a reference standard derived from hand-searching journals. Most filters were validated internally only. Reporting of methods was generally poor. Sensitivity, precision and specificity were the most commonly reported performance measures and were presented in tables. Aspects of DTA study methods are applicable to search filters, particularly in the development of the reference standard. There is limited evidence on how clinicians choose between diagnostic tests. No published literature was found on how searchers select filters. Interviewing and questioning searchers via a questionnaire found that filters were not appropriate for all tasks but were predominantly used to reduce large numbers of retrieved records and to introduce focus. The Inter Technology Appraisal Support Collaboration (InterTASC) Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG) Search Filters Resource was most frequently mentioned by both groups as the resource consulted to select a filter. Randomised controlled trial (RCT) and systematic review filters, in particular the Cochrane RCT and the McMaster Hedges filters, were most frequently mentioned. The majority indicated that they used different filters depending on the requirement for sensitivity or precision. Over half of the respondents used the filters available in databases. Interviewees used various approaches when using and adapting search filters. Respondents suggested that the main factors that would make choosing a filter easier were the availability of critical appraisals and more detailed performance information. Provenance and having the filter available in a central storage location were also important., Limitations: The questionnaire could have been shorter and could have included more multiple choice questions, and the reviews of filter performance focused on only four study designs., Conclusions: Search filter studies should use a representative reference standard and explicitly report methods and results. Performance measures should be presented systematically and clearly. Searchers find filters useful in certain circumstances but expressed a need for more user-friendly performance information to aid filter choice. We suggest approaches to use, adapt and report search filter performance. Future work could include research around search filters and performance measures for study designs not addressed here, exploration of alternative methods of displaying performance results and numerical synthesis of performance comparison results., Funding: The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and Medical Research Council-NIHR Methodology Research Programme (grant number G0901496).
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Feasibility of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule to safely reduce unnecessary hospital admissions: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Body R, Boachie C, McConnachie A, Carley S, Van Den Berg P, and Lecky FE
- Subjects
- Acute Coronary Syndrome blood, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomarkers blood, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge statistics & numerical data, Patient Discharge trends, Patient Outcome Assessment, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, United Kingdom, Unnecessary Procedures statistics & numerical data, Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnosis, Biomarkers analysis, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Severity of Illness Index
- Abstract
Background: Observational studies suggest that the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule can effectively 'rule out' and 'rule in' acute coronary syndromes (ACS) following a single blood test. In a pilot randomised controlled trial, we aimed to determine whether a large trial is feasible., Methods: Patients presenting to two EDs with suspected cardiac chest pain were randomised to receive care guided by the MACS decision rule (intervention group) or standard care (controls). The primary efficacy outcome was a successful discharge from the ED, defined as a decision to discharge within 4 hours of arrival providing that the patient did not have a missed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or develop a major adverse cardiac event (MACE: death, AMI or coronary revascularisation) within 30 days. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and attrition rates., Results: In total, 138 patients were included between October 2013 and October 2014, of whom 131 (95%) were randomised (66 to intervention and 65 controls). Nine (7%) patients had prevalent AMI and six (5%) had incident MACE within 30 days. All 131 patients completed 30-day follow-up and were included in the final analysis with no missing data for the primary analyses. Compared with standard care, a significantly greater proportion of patients whose care was guided by the MACS rule were successfully discharged within 4 hours (26% vs 8%, adjusted OR 5.45, 95% CI 1.73 to 17.11, p=0.004). No patients in either group who were discharged within 4 hours had a diagnosis of AMI or incident MACE within 30 days (0.0%, 95% CI 0% to 20.0% in the intervention group)., Conclusions: In this pilot trial, use of the MACS rule led to a significant increase in safe discharges from the ED but a larger, fully powered trial remains necessary. Our findings seem to support the feasibility of that trial., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN 86818215., Research Ethics Committee Reference: 13/NW/0081., Ukcrn Registration Id: 14334., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RB has previously undertaken research involving donation of reagents without charge by Roche, Abbott, Alere, Siemens and Randox. His institution has received remuneration for research funded and/or sponsored by Roche, Abbott Point of Care, FABPulous BV, Abbott Laboratories, Portola, Novartis, Shire and Boehringer Ingelheim. He has accepted the provision of economy class travel and accommodation to present findings unrelated to this work at two Roche-sponsored conferences and at a scientific session sponsored by Randox., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Concentration and Risk of First-Ever Cardiovascular Outcomes in 154,052 Participants.
- Author
-
Willeit P, Welsh P, Evans JDW, Tschiderer L, Boachie C, Jukema JW, Ford I, Trompet S, Stott DJ, Kearney PM, Mooijaart SP, Kiechl S, Di Angelantonio E, and Sattar N
- Subjects
- Biomarkers blood, Global Health, Humans, Incidence, Cardiovascular Diseases blood, Cardiovascular Diseases diagnosis, Cardiovascular Diseases epidemiology, Risk Assessment methods, Troponin blood
- Abstract
Background: High-sensitivity assays can quantify cardiac troponins I and T (hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT) in individuals with no clinically manifest myocardial injury., Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess associations of cardiac troponin concentration with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in primary prevention studies., Methods: A search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for prospective studies published up to September 2016, reporting on associations of cardiac troponin concentration with first-ever CVD outcomes (i.e., coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, or the combination of both). Study-specific estimates, adjusted for conventional risk factors, were extracted by 2 independent reviewers, supplemented with de novo data from PROSPER (Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Study), then pooled by using random effects meta-analysis., Results: A total of 28 relevant studies were identified involving 154,052 participants. Cardiac troponin was detectable in 80.0% (hs-cTnI: 82.6%; hs-cTnT: 69.7%). In PROSPER, positive associations of log-linear shape were observed between hs-cTnT and CVD outcomes. In the meta-analysis, the relative risks comparing the top versus the bottom troponin third were 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 to 1.56) for CVD (11,763 events), 1.67 (95% CI: 1.50 to 1.86) for fatal CVD (7,775 events), 1.59 (95% CI: 1.38 to 1.83) for CHD (7,061 events), and 1.35 (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.48) for stroke (2,526 events). For fatal CVD, associations were stronger in North American studies (p = 0.010) and those measuring hs-cTnT rather than hs-cTnI (p = 0.027)., Conclusions: In the general population, high cardiac troponin concentration within the normal range is associated with increased CVD risk. This association is independent of conventional risk factors, strongest for fatal CVD, and applies to both CHD and stroke., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Erratum to: Methods for evaluating medical tests and biomarkers.
- Author
-
Gopalakrishna G, Langendam M, Scholten R, Bossuyt P, Leeflang M, Noel-Storr A, Thomas J, Marshall I, Wallace B, Whiting P, Davenport C, Leeflang M, GopalaKrishna G, de Salis I, Mallett S, Wolff R, Whiting P, Riley R, Westwood M, Kleinen J, Collins G, Reitsma H, Moons K, Zapf A, Hoyer A, Kramer K, Kuss O, Ensor J, Deeks JJ, Martin EC, Riley RD, Rücker G, Steinhauser S, Schumacher M, Riley R, Ensor J, Snell K, Willis B, Debray T, Moons K, Deeks J, Collins G, di Ruffano LF, Willis B, Davenport C, Mallett S, Taylor-Phillips S, Hyde C, Deeks J, Mallett S, Taylor SA, Batnagar G, Taylor-Phillips S, Di Ruffano LF, Seedat F, Clarke A, Deeks J, Byron S, Nixon F, Albrow R, Walker T, Deakin C, Hyde C, Zhelev Z, Hunt H, di Ruffano LF, Yang Y, Abel L, Buchanan J, Fanshawe T, Shinkins B, Wynants L, Verbakel J, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Leeflang M, Zwinderman A, Bossuyt P, Oke J, O'Sullivan J, Perera R, Nicholson B, Bromley HL, Roberts TE, Francis A, Petrie D, Mann GB, Malottki K, Smith H, Deeks J, Billingham L, Sitch A, Mallett S, Deeks J, Gerke O, Holm-Vilstrup M, Segtnan EA, Halekoh U, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Francq BG, Deeks J, Sitch A, Dinnes J, Parkes J, Gregory W, Hewison J, Altman D, Rosenberg W, Selby P, Asselineau J, Perez P, Paye A, Bessede E, Proust-Lima C, Naaktgeboren C, de Groot J, Rutjes A, Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Moons K, Collins G, Ogundimu E, Cook J, Le Manach Y, Altman D, Wynants L, Vergouwe Y, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Pajouheshnia R, Groenwold R, Moons K, Reitsma J, Peelen L, Van Calster B, Nieboer D, Vergouwe Y, De Cock B, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW, Cooper J, Taylor-Phillips S, Parsons N, Stinton C, Smith S, Dickens A, Jordan R, Enocson A, Fitzmaurice D, Sitch A, Adab P, Francq BG, Boachie C, Vidmar G, Freeman K, Connock M, Taylor-Phillips S, Court R, Clarke A, de Groot J, Naaktgeboren C, Reitsma H, Moons C, Harris J, Mumford A, Plummer Z, Lee K, Reeves B, Rogers C, Verheyden V, Angelini GD, Murphy GJ, Huddy J, Ni M, Good K, Cooke G, Bossuyt P, Hanna G, Ma J, Altman D, Collins G, Moons KGMC, de Groot JAH, Mallett S, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Collins GS, Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Collins GS, Kamarudin AN, Kolamunnage-Dona R, Cox T, Ni M, Huddy J, Borsci S, Hanna G, Pérez T, Pardo MC, Candela-Toha A, Muriel A, Zamora J, Sanghera S, Mohiuddin S, Martin R, Donovan J, Coast J, Seo MK, Cairns J, Mitchell E, Smith A, Wright J, Hall P, Messenger M, Calder N, Wickramasekera N, Vinall-Collier K, Lewington A, Pajouheshnia R, Damen J, Groenwold R, Moons K, Peelen L, Messenger M, Cairns D, Smith A, Hutchinson M, Wright J, Hall P, Calder N, Sturgeon C, Mitchel L, Kift R, Christakoudi S, Rungall M, Mobillo P, Montero R, Tsui TL, Kon SP, Tucker B, Sacks S, Farmer C, Strom T, Chowdhury P, Rebollo-Mesa I, Hernandez-Fuentes M, Damen JAAG, Debray TPA, Heus P, Hooft L, Moons KGM, Pajouheshnia R, Reitsma JB, Scholten RJPM, Damen JAAG, Hooft L, Schuit E, Debray TPA, Collins GS, Tzoulaki I, Lassale CM, Siontis GCM, Chiocchia V, Roberts C, Schlüssel MM, Gerry S, Black JA, Heus P, van der Schouw YT, Peelen LM, Moons KGM, Damen JAAG, Debray TPA, Heus P, Hooft L, Moons KGM, Pajouheshnia R, Reitsma JB, Scholten RJPM, Ma J, Altman D, Collins G, Spence G, McCartney D, van den Bruel A, Lasserson D, Hayward G, Vach W, de Jong A, Burggraaff C, Hoekstra O, Zijlstra J, de Vet H, Hunt H, Hyde C, Graziadio S, Allen J, Johnston L, O'Leary R, Power M, Allen J, Graziadio S, Johnson L, O'Leary R, Power M, Waters R, Simpson J, Johnston L, Allen J, Graziadio S, O'Leary R, Waters R, Power M, Mallett S, Fanshawe TR, Phillips P, Plumb A, Helbren E, Halligan S, Taylor SA, Gale A, Mallett S, Sekula P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Mallett S, Fanshawe TR, Forman JR, Dutton SJ, Takwoingi Y, Hensor EM, Nichols TE, Shinkins B, Yang Y, Abel L, Di Ruffano LF, Fanshawe T, Kempf E, Porcher R, de Beyer J, Moons K, Altman D, Reitsma H, Hopewell S, Sauerbrei W, Collins G, Dennis J, Shields B, Jones A, Henley W, Pearson E, Hattersley A, Heus P, Damen JAAG, Pajouheshnia R, Scholten RJPM, Reitsma JB, Collins GS, Altman DG, Moons KGM, Hooft L, Shields B, Dennis J, Jones A, Henley W, Pearson E, Hattersley A, Scheibler F, Rummer A, Sturtz S, Großelfinger R, Banister K, Ramsay C, Azuara-Blanco A, Cook J, Boachie C, Burr J, Kumarasamy M, Bourne R, Uchegbu I, Borsci S, Murphy J, Hanna G, Uchegbu I, Carter A, Murphy J, Ni M, Marti J, Eatock J, Uchegbu I, Robotham J, Dudareva M, Gilchrist M, Holmes A, Uchegbu I, Borsci S, Monaghan P, Lord S, StJohn A, Sandberg S, Cobbaert C, Lennartz L, Verhagen-Kamerbeek W, Ebert C, Bossuyt P, Horvath A, Jenniskens K, Naaktgeboren C, Reitsma J, Moons K, de Groot J, Hyde C, Peters J, Grigore B, Peters J, Hyde C, Hyde C, Ukoumunne O, Peters J, Zhelev Z, Levis B, Benedetti A, Levis AW, Ioannidis JPA, Shrier I, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Kloda LA, McMillan D, Patten SB, Steele RJ, Ziegelstein RC, Bombardier CH, Osório FL, Fann JR, Gjerdingen D, Lamers F, Lotrakul M, Loureiro SR, Löwe B, Shaaban J, Stafford L, van Weert HCPM, Whooley MA, Williams LS, Wittkampf KA, Yeung AS, Thombs BD, Peters J, Cooper C, Buchanan J, Nieto T, Smith C, Tucker O, Dretzke J, Beggs A, Rai N, Davenport C, Bayliss S, Stevens S, Snell K, Mallet S, Deeks J, Sundar S, Hall E, Porta N, Estelles DL, and de Bono J
- Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s41512-016-0001-y.].
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.