Search

© 2014 Lazure et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.Background: The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a set of 14 domains of behavior change that provide a framework for the critical issues and factors influencing optimal knowledge translation. Consider

Purpose: Cushing's disease is associated with substantial morbidity and impaired quality of life (QoL) resulting from excess cortisol exposure. The current study explored improvements in clinical signs and additional specific manifestations of hypercortisolism during osilodrostat (potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor) therapy by degree of control of mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC)., Methods: LINC 3 (NCT02180217) was a prospective, open-label, 48-week study of osilodrostat (starting dose: 2 mg bid; maximum: 30 mg bid) that enrolled 137 adults with Cushing's disease and mUFC > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). mUFC (normal range 11‒138 nmol/24 h), cardiometabolic parameters (blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, body mass index, total cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin), physical manifestations of hypercortisolism (facial rubor, striae, fat distribution, bruising, hirsutism [females], muscle atrophy) and QoL were evaluated. mUFC was defined as controlled if ≤ ULN, partially controlled if > ULN but ≥ 50% reduction from baseline, and uncontrolled if > ULN and < 50% reduction from baseline. Concomitant medications were permitted throughout the study., Results: At weeks 24 and 48, respectively, mUFC was controlled in 93 (67.9%) and 91 (66.4%) patients, partially controlled in 20 (14.6%) and 13 (9.5%), and uncontrolled in 24 (17.5%) and 33 (24.1%). Overall, mean improvements from baseline in cardiometabolic at week 24 were greater in patients with controlled or partially controlled versus uncontrolled mUFC; at week 48, improvements occurred irrespective of mUFC control. Generally, physical manifestations and QoL progressively improved from baseline irrespective of mUFC control., Conclusions: Improvements in clinical signs and additional specific manifestations of hypercortisolism associated with Cushing's disease occurred alongside decreases in mUFC. Trial registration NCT02180217 (first posted July 2014)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Context: Paltusotine is a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paltusotine in the treatment of patients with acromegaly previously controlled with injected somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs)., Methods: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults with acromegaly who had insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) ≤1.0 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) while receiving a stable dose of depot octreotide or lanreotide. Patients were switched from injected SRLs and randomized to receive paltusotine or placebo orally for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining IGF-I ≤1.0×ULN. Secondary endpoints were change in IGF-I level, change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary (ASD) score, and maintenance of mean 5-sample growth hormone (GH) <1.0 ng/mL., Results: The primary endpoint was met: 83.3% (25/30) of patients receiving paltusotine and 3.6% (1/28) receiving placebo maintained IGF-I ≤1.0×ULN (odds ratio: 126.53; 95% CI: 13.73, >999.99; P<.0001). Paltusotine was also superior to placebo for all secondary endpoints: mean (±SE) change in IGF-I of 0.04±0.09×ULN versus 0.83±0.1×ULN (P<.0001); mean (±SE) change in ASD score of -0.6±1.5 versus 4.6±1.6 (P=.02); mean GH maintained at <1.0 ng/mL in 20/23 (87.0%) versus 5/18 (27.8%) patients (odds ratio: 16.61; 95% CI: 2.86, 181.36; P=.0003). The most common adverse events were acromegaly symptoms and gastrointestinal effects characteristic of SRLs., Conclusion: Replacement of injected SRLs by once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining both biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly and was well tolerated., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.)

This Consensus Statement from an international, multidisciplinary workshop sponsored by the Pituitary Society offers evidence-based graded consensus recommendations and key summary points for clinical practice on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Epidemiology and pathogenesis, clinical presentation of disordered pituitary hormone secretion, assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and biochemical evaluation, optimal use of imaging strategies and disease-related complications are addressed. In-depth discussions present the latest evidence on treatment of prolactinoma, including efficacy, adverse effects and options for withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy, as well as indications for surgery, preoperative medical therapy and radiation therapy. Management of prolactinoma in special situations is discussed, including cystic lesions, mixed growth hormone-secreting and prolactin-secreting adenomas and giant and aggressive prolactinomas. Furthermore, considerations for pregnancy and fertility are outlined, as well as management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents, patients with an underlying psychiatric disorder, postmenopausal women, transgender individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease. The workshop concluded that, although treatment resistance is rare, there is a need for additional therapeutic options to address clinical challenges in treating these patients and a need to facilitate international registries to enable risk stratification and optimization of therapeutic strategies., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Objective: This study evaluated short- and long-term efficacy and safety of the second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand pasireotide alone or in combination with dopamine agonist cabergoline in patients with Cushing's disease (CD)., Study Design: This is an open-label, multicenter, non-comparative, Phase II study comprising 35-week core phase and an optional extension phase. All patients started with pasireotide, and cabergoline was added if cortisol remained elevated. Eligible patients had active CD, with or without prior surgery, were pasireotide naïve at screening or had discontinued pasireotide for reasons other than safety. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with a mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) level not exceeding the upper limit of normal (ULN) at week 35 with missing data imputed using last available post-baseline assessments., Results: Of 68 patients enrolled, 26 (38.2%) received pasireotide monotherapy and 42 (61.8%) received pasireotide plus cabergoline during the core phase. Thirty-four patients (50.0%; 95% CI 37.6-62.4) achieved the primary endpoint, of whom 17 (50.0%) received pasireotide monotherapy and 17 (50.0%) received combination therapy. Proportion of patients with mUFC control remained stable during the extension phase up to week 99. Treatment with either mono or combination therapy provided sustained improvements in clinical symptoms of hypercortisolism up to week 99. Hyperglycemia and nausea (51.5% each), diarrhea (44.1%) and cholelithiasis (33.8%) were the most frequent adverse events., Conclusion: Addition of cabergoline in patients with persistently elevated mUFC on maximum tolerated doses of pasireotide is an effective and well-tolerated long-term strategy for enhancing control of hypercortisolism in some CD patients., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01915303, identifier NCT01915303., Competing Interests: HP and RM were Novartis employees and owned Novartis stocks. AMP was employed by Novartis and Recordati. AC is a Novartis employee and owns Novartis stocks. RF received research grants from Strongbridge and Corcept, consulting fee from Recordati, honoraria and financial support for meetings and/or travel from HRA Pharma and Recordati, and attended advisory boards for Recordati. MF has received research support to Oregon Health & Science University as a principal investigator from Recordati and Xeris Strongbridge and has performed occasional scientific consultancy for Recordati, HRA Pharma, Sparrow, and Xeris Strongbridge. PK attended advisory boards for Recordati. MB’s institution received consulting fee and attended advisory boards from Recordati. DG-D received research grants from Recordati Rare Disease and Bayer, consulting fee from Abbott-Lafrancol, Biotoscana, PTC lab, Glaxo/Helou, Recordati Rare Disease, and Bayer, honoraria from Valentech Pharma, Sanofi, and Bayer, travel grants from Recordati Rare Disease, advocacy groups and other leadership roles from Asociación Colombiana de Endocrinologia and Asociación Colombiana de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo, and other financial and non-financial interests include Asociacion Colombiana de Endocrinologia y Metabolismo, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fé de Bogota, and Asociación Colombiana de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo. CB received research grants from Novartis and Recordati, and consulting and speaker fee from Novartis. BB served as the principal investigator for grants to Massachusetts General Hospital from Cortendo/Strongbridge Xeris, Millendo, and Novartis and has occasionally consulted for Cortendo/Strongbridge Xeris, HRA Pharma, Novartis Recordati, and Sparrow. RP and his institution received research grants and honoraria from Pfizer, Ipsen, Novartis, Merck Serono, IBSA Farmaceutici, Corcept, Shire, HRA Pharma, ICON, Covance, Neuroendocrine CAH, Camurus, Recordati, Janssen Cilag, and CMED Clinical Services, received consulting fee from Recordati Rare Disease, Organon Italia, Siunergos Pharma, Corcept, S&R Farmaceutici S.p.A., DAMOR Farmaceutici, and Pfizer, attended advisory boards from Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Disease, Pfizer, and HRA Pharma. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Novartis Pharma AG. Novartis was involved in the study design, analysis, interpretation of data, and providing financial support for medical editorial assistance of this article., (Copyright © 2023 Feelders, Fleseriu, Kadioglu, Bex, González-Devia, Boguszewski, Yavuz, Patino, Pedroncelli, Maamari, Chattopadhyay, Biller and Pivonello.)

Context: Effectiveness and safety data on GH replacement therapy (GHRT) in older adults with adult GH deficiency (AGHD) are limited., Objective: To compare GHRT safety and clinical outcomes in older (≥60 years and, for some outcomes, ≥75 years) and middle-aged (35-<60 years) patients with AGHD., Design/setting: Ten-year follow-up, real-world data from 2 large noninterventional studies-NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) and the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program-were analyzed., Patients: GH-naïve and non-naïve patients with AGHD., Intervention: Norditropin® (somatropin)., Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included GH exposure, IGF-I standard deviation scores (SDS), body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ), serious and nonserious adverse reactions (SARs and NSARs, respectively), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Adverse reactions were events with possible/probable causal relationship to GHRT., Results: The effectiveness analysis set comprised 545 middle-aged and 214 older patients (19 aged ≥75 years) from NordiNet® IOS. The full analysis set comprised 1696 middle-aged and 652 older patients (59 aged ≥75 years) from both studies. Mean GH doses were higher in middle-aged vs older patients. For both age groups and sexes, mean IGF-I SDS increased following GHRT, while BMI and HbA 1c changes were similar and small.Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) did not differ statistically between older and middle-aged patients for NSARs [IRR (mean, 95% confidence interval) 1.05 (.60; 1.83)] or SARs [.40 (.12; 1.32)]. SAEs were more frequent in older than middle-aged patients [IRR 1.84 (1.29; 2.62)]., Conclusion: Clinical outcomes of GHRT in AGHD were similar in middle-aged and older patients, with no significantly increased risk of GHRT-related adverse reactions in older patients., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.)

Purpose: The long-term effects of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) analogues on glucose metabolism in adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) are not known. We investigated the impact of LAGH somapacitan, administered once-weekly, on glucose metabolism in patients with AGHD., Methods: In post hoc-defined analyses, we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan)., Results: No new cases of diabetes mellitus were reported with somapacitan. Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks. HbA1c and HOMA-β did not differ between groups at either timepoint. Among treatment-naïve patients, sex, age, fasting insulin, glucose tolerance status and body mass index did not influence changes in glucose metabolism. In previously treated patients (REAL 1 extension: n = 51 somapacitan, n = 52 daily GH; REAL 2: n = 61 and n = 31, respectively; REAL Japan: n = 46 and n = 16, respectively), the difference in changes from baseline were not statistically significant between somapacitan and daily GH for any glucose metabolism parameters., Conclusions: Somapacitan, compared with daily GH, did not adversely affect glucose metabolism up to 86 weeks in a large cohort of treatment-naïve or previously treated patients with AGHD. Trial registrations (date of registration): NCT02229851 (2 September 2014), NCT02382939 (3 March 2015), NCT03075644 (7 March 2017)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is a rare endocrine disorder characterized by an abnormal body composition, metabolic abnormalities associated with increased cardiovascular diseases, bone loss, and impaired quality of life. Daily subcutaneous injections with recombinant growth hormone (GH) can alleviate the abnormalities associated with AGHD. Several long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations are currently in development that aim to reduce treatment burden for patients receiving daily GH injections. Somapacitan (Sogroya ® ; Novo Nordisk, Denmark) is the first LAGH preparation that has been approved for treatment of AGHD in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The recent approval of somapacitan and anticipated approval of other LAGH molecules presents new questions for physicians planning to treat AGHD with LAGH in the future. Differences in the technologies used to prolong the half-life of recombinant GH are expected to result in variations in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles between preparations. Therefore, it is essential that physicians understand and consider such variations when treating patients with these novel GH replacement therapies. Here, we present a set of treatment recommendations that have been created to guide physicians initiating therapy with somapacitan in patients with AGHD who are eligible for GH replacement. Furthermore, we will review the published data that underlie these recommendations to explain the rationale for the treatment and monitoring advice provided., Competing Interests: MB has received research support, lecture fees and/or consulting honoraria from Antisense, Chiasma, Diasorin, Genexine, Genescience, IDS, Ionis, IPSEN, Midatech, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ONO, OPKO, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz and StrongBridge; Beverly MK Biller has received occasional consulting honoraria from Aeterna Zentaris, Ascendis, Merck Serono and Novo Nordisk, and has served as the PI of a research grant to Massachusetts General Hospital from Ascendis; DC has served as a consultant for Novo Nordisk and on advisory boards. He has also served as a consultant for Crinetics and Pfizer; JJ has received lecture fees and serves on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk and has also served on advisory boards for Ascendis, in addition to having received unrestricted research grants from Pfizer; Hiroshi Nishioka has received honoraria from Teijin Pharma and Novo Nordisk, and has received grant support from Teijin Pharma; YT has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Recordati Rare Disease, Otsuka Pharma and Ascendis Pharma, and has received grant support from Ono Pharma, Teijin Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Kowa Pharma, Taisho Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo Pharma and Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bidlingmaier, Biller, Clemmons, Jørgensen, Nishioka and Takahashi.)

Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Long-term growth hormone (GH) treatment could improve CV outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate CV disease risk in patients with AGHD who received GH replacement therapy for up to 10 years as part of NordiNet® IOS (NCT00960128) and the ANSWER Program (NCT01009905). The studies were observational, non-interventional and multicentre, monitoring long-term effectiveness and safety of GH treatment. NordiNet® IOS involved 23 countries (469 sites) across Europe and the Middle East. The ANSWER Program was conducted in the USA (207 sites). This analysis included patients aged 18-75 years who were GH naïve at study entry, who had ≤10 years of GH treatment data and who could be assessed for CV risk for at least 1 follow-up year. The main outcome measure was risk of CV disease by age 75 years, as calculated with the Multinational Cardiovascular Risk Consortium model (Brunner score) using non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol adjusted for age, sex and CV risk factors. The results of this analysis showed that CV risk decreased gradually over the 10-year period for GH-treated patients. The risk was lower for patients treated for 2 and 7 years vs age- and sex-matched control groups (not yet started treatment) (14.51% vs 16.15%; P = 0.0105 and 13.53% vs 16.81%; P = 0.0001, respectively). This suggests that GH treatment in people with AGHD may reduce the risk of CV disease by age 75 years compared with matched controls.

Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare endocrine condition frequently caused by a tumor resulting in elevated cortisol levels. Cushing's disease (CD) caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma is the most common form of endogenous CS. Medical therapy for CD is mostly used as second-line treatment after failed surgery or recurrence and comprises several pituitary-directed drugs, adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors, and a glucocorticoid receptor blocker, some of which are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for this condition. The recent Pituitary Society consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of CD described osilodrostat, an oral inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase, as an effective, FDA-approved medical therapy for CD. Because clinical experience outside clinical trials is limited, we provide here a review of published data about osilodrostat and offer example case studies demonstrating practical considerations on the use of this medication. Recommendations regarding osilodrostat are provided for the following situations: specific assessments needed before treatment initiation; monitoring for adrenal insufficiency, hypokalemia, and changes in QTc; the potential value of a slow up-titration in patients with mild disease; managing temporary treatment cessation for patients with CD who have acquired coronavirus disease 2019; monitoring for increased testosterone levels in women; exercising caution with concomitant medication use; considering whether a higher dose at nighttime might be beneficial; and managing cortisol excess in ectopic and adrenal CS. This review highlights key clinical situations that physicians may encounter when using osilodrostat and provides practical recommendations for optimal patient care when treating CS, with a focus on CD., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Many patients with Cushing's disease (CD) require long-term medical therapy to control their hypercortisolism. In the core phase of a Phase II study (LINC 2; NCT01331239), osilodrostat normalized mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) in 78.9% of patients with CD. Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety data for osilodrostat following completion of an optional extension to LINC 2., Methods: Adult patients with CD were enrolled in a 22-week prospective Phase II study. Patients with mUFC ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) or receiving clinical benefit at week 22 could enter the optional extension. The proportion of complete (mUFC ≤ ULN) or partial (mUFC &gt; ULN but ≥ 50% decrease from baseline) mUFC responders was assessed over time., Results: Sixteen of 19 enrolled patients entered the extension. Median (range) osilodrostat exposure from baseline to study end was 5.4 years (0.04-6.7); median (range) average dose was 10.6 mg/day (1.1-47.9). Overall response rate (complete and partial mUFC responders) was consistently ≥ 50%. Sustained control of most cardiovascular-related parameters was observed during the extension. The long-term safety profile was consistent with that reported during the core phase. Testosterone levels (females) decreased towards baseline levels during long-term follow-up, with no new or worsening cases of hirsutism during the extension., Conclusions: In the longest prospective study of a steroidogenesis inhibitor to date, osilodrostat provided sustained reductions in mUFC for up to 6.7 years of treatment, with no new safety signals emerging during the extension. These findings support osilodrostat as an effective long-term treatment for patients with CD., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: To investigate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, for treating Cushing's disease (CD)., Design/methods: A total of 137 adults with CD and mean 24-h urinary free cortisol (mUFC) > 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) received osilodrostat (starting dose 2 mg bid; maximum 30 mg bid) during the prospective, Phase III, 48-week LINC 3 (NCT02180217) core study. Patients benefiting from osilodrostat at week 48 could enter the optional extension (ending when all patients had received ≥ 72 weeks of treatment or discontinued). Efficacy and safety were assessed for all enrolled patients from the core study baseline., Results: Median osilodrostat exposure from the core study baseline to study end was 130 weeks (range 1-245) and median average dose was 7.4 mg/day (range 0.8-46.6). The reduction in mean mUFC achieved during the core was maintained during the extension and remained ≤ ULN. Of 106 patients, 86 (81%) patients who entered the extension had mUFC ≤ ULN at week 72. Improvements in cardiovascular/metabolic-related parameters, physical manifestations of hypercortisolism (fat pads, central obesity, rubor, striae, and hirsutism in females), and quality of life in the core study were also maintained or improved further during the extension. No new safety signals were reported; 15/137 (10.9%) and 12/106 (11.3%) patients discontinued for adverse events during the core and extension, respectively. Mean testosterone in females decreased towards baseline levels during the extension., Conclusions: Data from this large, multicentre trial show that long-term treatment with osilodrostat sustains cortisol normalisation alongside clinical benefits in most patients with CD and is well tolerated.

Objective: Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is individually titrated due to variable dose-responses among patients. The aim of this study was to provide clinical guidance on dosing and titration of the novel long-acting GH derivative somapacitan based on analyses of somapacitan dose-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) responses in AGHD patients., Design: Analyses of dosing information, 4364 somapacitan concentration samples and 4880 IGF-I samples from 330 AGHD patients treated with somapacitan in three phase 3 trials., Methods: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling was used to evaluate starting dose groups by age and oral oestrogen therapy, characterise the dose-IGF-I response in the overall AGHD population and patient subgroups, predict the IGF-I response to dose changes and simulate missed dosing., Results: The analyses supported the clinical recommendations of higher starting doses for younger patients and women on oral oestrogen replacement therapy. For patients switching from daily GH treatment, the mean maintenance dose ratio between somapacitan (mg/week) and somatropin (mg/day) was predicted to be 8.2 (observed interquartile range of 6.7-9.1). Simulations of IGF-I SDS profiles confirmed the appropriate time for IGF-I sampling to be 3-4 days after somapacitan dosing and supported somapacitan administration with up to 3 days delay in case of missed dosing. Subgroup analyses characterised the dose-exposure-IGF-I response in patient subgroups and indicated that dose requirements are mainly influenced by sex and oral oestrogen treatment., Conclusions: This study extends the knowledge of the somapacitan dose-IGF-I response and provides information on clinical dosing of once-weekly somapacitan in patients with AGHD.

Growth hormone (GH) has been used for over 35 years, and its safety and efficacy has been studied extensively. Experimental studies showing the permissive role of GH/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) in carcinogenesis have raised concerns regarding the safety of GH replacement in children and adults who have received treatment for cancer and those with intracranial and pituitary tumours. A consensus statement was produced to guide decision-making on GH replacement in children and adult survivors of cancer, in those treated for intracranial and pituitary tumours and in patients with increased cancer risk. With the support of the European Society of Endocrinology, the Growth Hormone Research Society convened a Workshop, where 55 international key opinion leaders representing 10 professional societies were invited to participate. This consensus statement utilized: (1) a critical review paper produced before the Workshop, (2) five plenary talks, (3) evidence-based comments from four breakout groups, and (4) discussions during report-back sessions. Current evidence reviewed from the proceedings from the Workshop does not support an association between GH replacement and primary tumour or cancer recurrence. The effect of GH replacement on secondary neoplasia risk is minor compared to host- and tumour treatment-related factors. There is no evidence for an association between GH replacement and increased mortality from cancer amongst GH-deficient childhood cancer survivors. Patients with pituitary tumour or craniopharyngioma remnants receiving GH replacement do not need to be treated or monitored differently than those not receiving GH. GH replacement might be considered in GH-deficient adult cancer survivors in remission after careful individual risk/benefit analysis. In children with cancer predisposition syndromes, GH treatment is generally contraindicated but may be considered cautiously in select patients.

Objective: We aimed to (1) examine the diagnosis of opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency, and (2) investigate the diagnostic value of a morning cortisol <83 nmol/L (3 µg/dl) for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency, using newer more specific cortisol assays and cut-offs., Design: Retrospective study (5/2015-10/2020)., Participants: Cohort 1 (N = 75): adults who underwent cosyntropin stimulation testing and opioid exposure for >30 days. Cohort 2 (N = 854): adults, with or without opioid exposure, who had a morning cortisol level measured the same day as stimulation testing., Measurements: Peak cortisol during cosyntropin stimulation testing. Sensitivity and specificity of morning serum cortisol for adrenal insufficiency., Results: The prevalence of adrenal insufficiency in patients with chronic opioid exposure who underwent cosyntropin stimulation testing was 4.0% using a cortisol cutoff of <405 nmol/L (14.7 µg/dl) versus 19% using the traditional cutoff of <500 nmol/L (18.1 µg/dl). For hospitalized patients with and without opioid-exposure, 14 of 22 (64%) patients with morning cortisol levels of <83 nmol/L (3 µg/dl) passed cosyntropin stimulation testing. A morning cortisol level of <348 nmol/L (12.6 µg/dl) had 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval: 84.5%-100%) for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency., Conclusion: Applying a cutoff of <405 nmol/L (14.7 µg/dl), opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency is rare. Nearly 1 out of 6 patients would be reclassified as having adrenal insufficiency applying the guideline-recommended cutoff of <500 nmol/L (18.1 µg/dl). Serum morning cortisol <83 nmol/L (3 µg/dl) is not a valid diagnostic test for adrenal insufficiency in hospitalized patients, whether or not receiving opioids., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cushing's disease requires accurate diagnosis, careful treatment selection, and long-term management to optimise patient outcomes. The Pituitary Society convened a consensus workshop comprising more than 50 academic researchers and clinical experts to discuss the application of recent evidence to clinical practice. In advance of the virtual meeting, data from 2015 to present about screening and diagnosis; surgery, medical, and radiation therapy; and disease-related and treatment-related complications of Cushing's disease summarised in recorded lectures were reviewed by all participants. During the meeting, concise summaries of the recorded lectures were presented, followed by small group breakout discussions. Consensus opinions from each group were collated into a draft document, which was reviewed and approved by all participants. Recommendations regarding use of laboratory tests, imaging, and treatment options are presented, along with algorithms for diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome and management of Cushing's disease. Topics considered most important to address in future research are also identified., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MF has received grants to her institution from Novartis, Strongbridge, Novo Nordisk, Crinetics, Millendo, Ascendis, and Pfizer; personal honoraria for consulting and advisory boards from Crinetics, HRA Pharma, Novartis, Recordati, Strongbridge, Sparrow, Ascendis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; and has served on the Board of the Pituitary Society. RA has received grants to his institution from Strongbridge Biopharma, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Corcept Therapeutics, and personal honoraria for consulting and advisory boards from Strongbridge Biopharma, Recordati Rare Diseases, Corcept Therapeutics, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. IB has received grants and fees for consulting, advisory boards, and authorship to her institution from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Strongbridge, Corcept, HRA Pharma, Sparrow Pharmaceutics, Adrenas Pharmaceutics, and Elsevier, and non-financial support to her institution from HRA Pharma. AB-S has received personal honoraria for advisory boards from Recordati. JB has received grants to his institution from Novartis, HRA Pharma, and Recordati, and personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, and meeting attendance from Novartis, HRA Pharma, Ipsen, and Recordati. NRB has served on the Board or as an advisor for European Neuroendocrine Association and the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions. CLB has received grants and personal honoraria for lectures from Novartis and served on the Board or as an advisor for Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Endocrine Society, and European Society of Endocrinology. MDB has received grants as principal investigator from Novartis. JDC has received grants to his institution from Novartis, Strongbridge, and Crinetics; personal honoraria for consulting and authorship from Recordati, Novo Nordisk, Corcept, and Merck Manual; and served on the Board or as an advisor for Pituitary Society, Endocrine Society, and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. FFC has served on the Board of the Pituitary Society. FC has received personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, and support for meeting attendance from Recordati Rare Diseases, Ipsen, and HRA Pharma. PC has received grants and honoraria to his institution for consulting and lectures from Novartis and Recordati. JF has received grants to his institution from Novartis and personal honoraria for consulting and advisory boards from Corcept, Recordati, and Novartis. MGa has received non-financial support from Novartis and Recordati and served on the Board or as an advisor for Pituitary Society and Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism. EBG has received grants and personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, and advisory boards from Novartis, Corcept, Strongbridge, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Recordati, and HRA Pharma; and has served as an advisor for Cushing's Support & Research Foundation. AGi has received grants to his institution from Pfizer and personal honoraria for consulting and advisory boards from Abiogen, Novo Nordisk, and Recordati; and has served on the Board or as an advisor to European Society of Endocrinology and Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis Skeletal Endocrinology Group. AGr has served as an advisor to Novartis and as an editor for Neuroendocrinology and Journal of Neuroendocrinology. MGu has received personal honoraria for consulting and lectures from Recordati Rare Diseases UK, HRA Pharma, and Ipsen; and is a Board member or advisor for UK Society for Endocrinology and European Society of Endocrinology. AGI has received grants to her institution from Recordati, Novartis, and Strongbridge; and personal honoraria for consulting from Recordati, HRA Pharma, and Strongbridge. UBK has received grants as co-investigator from Corcept; personal honoraria for consulting, advisory board, and lectures from Acerus Pharmaceuticals and Novo Nordisk; and serves as editor for Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism and as Board member for Endocrine Society. NK has received personal honoraria for consulting from Recordati Rare Diseases and HRA Pharma, and has served as Board member or advisor for Pituitary Society, European Neuroendocrine Association, Endocrine Society, and European Society of Endocrinology. LK has received personal honoraria for consulting from Strongbridge and Recordati. DFK has received royalties from Mizuho. AL has received grants from Recordati and Corcept; personal honoraria for lectures, support for meeting attendance, and advisory boards from Pfizer, Ipsen, Corcept, and the European Journal of Endocrinology; royalties from UpToDate Endocrinology; and served as a Board member for International Society of Endocrinology. AM has received grants and personal honoraria for lectures or presentations and support for meeting attendance from Pfizer, Ipsen, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk, and served as a Council member for Endocrine Society of Australia. SM has received grants to his institution from US Food and Drug Administration and non-financial support from Cyclacel. MM has received grants to his institution from Corcept, Novartis, and Strongbridge; fees for expert testimony from Janssen and Corcept; and personal honoraria for advisory boards for Merck, Pfizer, Recordati, and Strongbridge. JN-P has received grants and honoraria to the institution for consulting and advisory boards from Diurnal Ltd and HRA Pharma, Recordati, and Novartis; and served as a Board member or advisor for Pituitary Foundation and Endocrine Society. LN has received royalties from UpToDate and support for meeting attendance from the NIH, and has served as a Board member for Endocrine Society. AMP has received grants to his institution from HRA Pharma and served as advisor for European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions and European Endocrine Society. SP has received personal honoraria for lectures and advisory boards from HRA Pharma, Recordati Pharma, Novartis Pharma, and Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. RP has received grants to his institution from Novartis, Pfizer, Ipsen, Shire, IBSA Farmaceutici, HRA Pharma, Cortendo AB, Corcept Therapeutics, and Merck Serono, and personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, support for meeting attendance, and advisory boards from Novartis, Shire, HRA Pharma, Cortendo AB, Pfizer, Recordati, IBSA Farmaceutici, and Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. HR has received personal honoraria for consulting from Cerium and non-financial support from Corcept. MR has received personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, and advisory boards from Novartis, Recordati, HRA Pharma, and Ipsen. RS has received grants to his institution from Corcept and Crinetics, and personal honoraria for consulting from Strongbridge, Corcept, HRA Pharma, and Sterotherapeutics. CS has received grants and personal honoraria for lectures from Pfizer, Novartis, Recordati Rare Diseases, and HRA Pharma. IS has received personal honoraria for consulting from Medison Pharma. CAS has received grants from Pfizer; personal honoraria for consulting and support for meeting attendance from Lundbeck Pharma and the NIH; holds patents on the genetics of PRKAR1A, PDE11A, and GPR101; and has served as a Board member or advisor for Society for Pediatric Research, Children's Inn at NIH, and Cushing's Foundation. AT has received grants to his institution from HRA Pharma, and personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, and support for meeting attendance from HRA Pharma, Recordati Rare Diseases, and Ipsen. YT has received personal honoraria for consulting and lectures from Novo Nordisk, Recordati Rare Diseases, Bohringer Ingelheim, and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma. MT has served as an advisor to European Society of Endocrinology. ST has received grants to his institution from Strongbridge, Crinetics, and Novartis, and personal honoraria for lectures, advisory boards, and support for meeting attendance from Recordati, Pfizer, and Ipsen. EV has received grants through the European Society of Endocrinology from HRA Pharma, Novartis, Recordati, and Corcept, and received personal honoraria for consulting, lectures, and advisory boards from HRA Pharma, HRA Pharma Spain, and Recordati Rare Diseases. GV has received grants to her institution from Novartis, Recordati, and Corcept; personal honoraria and honoraria to the institution for consulting and lectures from HRA Pharma and Recordati; and served as an advisor for Cushing's Hub. SMW has received grants through the European Society of Endocrinology from HRA Pharma, Novartis, Recordati, and Corcept, and received personal honoraria for consulting and lectures from HRA Pharma and Recordati Rare Diseases. MCZ has served as a Board member for European Neuroendocrine Association. BMKB has received grants to her institution from Novartis, Opko, Strongbridge, and Millendo; personal honoraria for consulting from Aeterna Zentaris, Ascendis, Crinetics, Merck Serono, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Strongbridge, and Sparrow; and served as an advisor for Endocrine Society. MB, KH, PM, BS, EVV, and JW have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Pregnancies are rare in women with pituitary adenomas, which may relate to hormone excess from secretory subtypes such as prolactinomas or corticotroph adenomas. Decreased fertility may also result from pituitary hormone deficiencies due to compression of the gland by large tumours and/or surgical or radiation treatment of the lesion. Counselling premenopausal women with pituitary adenomas about their chance of conceiving spontaneously or with assisted reproductive technology, and the optimal pre-conception treatment, should start at the time of initial diagnosis. The normal physiological changes during pregnancy need to be considered when interpreting endocrine tests in women with pituitary adenomas. Dose adjustments in hormone substitution therapies may be needed across the trimesters. When medical therapy is used for pituitary hormone excess, consideration should be given to the known efficacy and safety data specific to pregnant women for each therapeutic option. In healthy women, pituitary gland size increases during pregnancy. Since some pituitary adenomas also enlarge during pregnancy, there is a risk of visual impairment, especially in women with macroadenomas or tumours near the optic chiasm. Pituitary apoplexy represents a rare acute complication of adenomas requiring surveillance, with surgical intervention needed in some cases. This guideline describes the choice and timing of diagnostic tests and treatments from the pre-conception stage until after delivery, taking into account adenoma size, location and endocrine activity. In most cases, pregnant women with pituitary adenomas should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in a centre specialised in the treatment of such tumours.

Purpose: Data on the safety of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy during pregnancy are limited. We report a combined analysis of data from pregnant women treated with GH while enrolled in two non-interventional, multicenter studies: NordiNet® International Outcome Study (IOS) and the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled Research (ANSWER) Program., Methods: Pregnancy data were pooled from NordiNet® IOS and the ANSWER Program. Data were collected during routine clinic visits by participating physicians using a web-based system. Patients exposed to GH replacement therapy during pregnancy were included in the analysis., Results: The study population included 40 female patients with typical causes of adult GH deficiency (GHD). Overall, there were 54 pregnancies. Of these, 47 were exposed to GH between conception and delivery. In 48.9% of pregnancies exposed to GH, the dose was > 0.6 mg/day. GH was continued past conception and then stopped during the first, second, and third trimester, in 27.7%, 17.0%, and 2.1% of pregnancies, respectively. In 29.8%, GH was continued throughout pregnancy, with an unchanged dose in most cases. Of the 47 GH-exposed pregnancies, 37 (78.7%) progressed to normal delivery. There were three adverse events reported in two pregnancies., Conclusion: These real-world data suggest that there were no new safety signals related to GH exposure in women with GHD during pregnancy. These results are consistent with findings from previous studies reporting data in pregnancies exposed to GH at conception or throughout pregnancy. This observational study in additional pregnancies provides further evidence that GH exposure does not adversely affect pregnancy outcome., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00960128 (date of registration: August 13, 2009) and NCT01009905 (date of registration: November 5, 2009)., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction : Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare, life-threatening endocrine disorder that is caused by chronic exposure to cortisol overproduction. Levoketoconazole (Recorlev), a 2 S , 4 R stereoisomer of ketoconazole, is a steroidogenesis inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of CS. Areas covered : This review covers the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of levoketoconazole for the treatment of patients with endogenous CS. Expert opinion : Based on the preclinical and clinical pharmacology findings, levoketoconazole appears to be the relevant enantiomer of ketoconazole for inhibition of steroidogenesis, with more potent inhibition of both cortisol and androgen synthesis relative to ketoconazole racemate and the 2 R , 4 S stereoisomer dextroketoconazole. Results from the phase III SONICS study showed that levoketoconazole was effective in normalizing cortisol levels and improving biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in a significant percentage of patients. In addition, treatment with levoketoconazole showed improvements in subjective clinical assessments of clinician-rated CS clinical signs and symptoms, patient-reported quality of life, and depression symptom severity. Testosterone levels decreased significantly in women. Levoketoconazole had an acceptable safety profile with no unexpected safety signals. The favorable pharmacology, efficacy, and safety profile of levoketoconazole supports its use as medical therapy for CS, if approved.

In adults, growth hormone (GH) deficiency is associated with increased visceral adiposity, decreased lean body mass, bone mineral density and exercise capacity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, increased cardiometabolic and fracture risk, and impaired quality of life. The aim of the present article is to review the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. To avoid overdiagnosis of GH deficiency, it is critical to evaluate only patients at risk for pituitary dysfunction, including those who have had sellar masses, pituitary surgery, radiation therapy, traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage or childhood onset GH deficiency. Evaluation for GH deficiency should be undertaken after testing and replacement of other pituitary hormone deficits. Since GH secretion is pulsatile, measuring serum GH levels randomly is not helpful in establishing the diagnosis of GH deficiency. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels lack substantial diurnal variation but also lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. However, adults with multiple (≥3) additional pituitary hormone deficiencies, risk factors for hypopituitarism and low serum IGF-I levels are very likely to be GH deficient. In most cases, the diagnosis of GH deficiency requires stimulation testing. These tests involve the administration of a pharmacologic agent that normally stimulates GH release from pituitary somatotrophs, including insulin, glucagon, growth hormone releasing hormone-arginine or macimorelin, followed by sampling of serum specimens at regular intervals for GH assay. Patients with a peak GH level that is below a predetermined cutpoint are classified as GH deficient. A systematic approach to the diagnosis of GH deficiency is essential in order to accurately identify adults who may benefit from GH replacement.

Guidelines and consensus statements ensure that physicians managing acromegaly patients have access to current information on evidence-based treatments to optimize outcomes. Given significant novel recent advances in understanding acromegaly natural history and individualized therapies, the Pituitary Society invited acromegaly experts to critically review the current literature in the context of Endocrine Society guidelines and Acromegaly Consensus Group statements. This update focuses on how recent key advances affect treatment decision-making and outcomes, and also highlights the likely role of recently FDA-approved therapies as well as novel combination therapies within the treatment armamentarium.

Purpose: The efficacy of levoketoconazole in treating hypercortisolism was demonstrated in an open-label phase 3 study (SONICS) of adults with endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) and baseline mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) ≥  1.5× ULN. Clinical signs and symptoms and patient-reported outcomes from the SONICS trial were evaluated in the current manuscript., Methods: Patients titrated to an individualized therapeutic dose entered a 6-month maintenance phase. Secondary endpoints included investigator-graded clinical signs and symptoms of CS during the maintenance phase, and patient-reported quality of life (CushingQoL questionnaire) and depression symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI-II])., Results: Of 94 enrolled patients, 77 entered the maintenance phase following individualized dose titration. Significant mean improvements from baseline were noted at end of maintenance (Month 6) for acne, hirsutism (females only), and peripheral edema. These improvements were observed as early as Day 1 of maintenance for hirsutism (mean baseline score, 7.8; ∆ - 1.9; P < 0.0001), end of Month 1 for acne (mean baseline score, 2.8; ∆ - 1.2; P = 0.0481), and Month 4 for peripheral edema (mean baseline score, 1.0; ∆ - 0.5; P = 0.0052). Significant mean improvements from baseline were observed by Month 3 of maintenance for CushingQoL (mean baseline score, 44.3; ∆ + 6.9; P = 0.0018) and at Month 6 for BDI-II (mean baseline score, 17.1; ∆ - 4.3; P = 0.0043) scores. No significant mean improvement was identified in a composite score of 7 other clinical signs and symptoms., Conclusions: Treatment with levoketoconazole was associated with sustained, meaningful improvements in QoL, depression, and certain clinical signs and symptoms characteristic of CS. ClinialTrials.gov identifier: NCT01838551.

Objective: The macimorelin test is approved for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) based on its efficacy vs the insulin tolerance test (ITT). Macimorelin has a significant advantage over ITT in avoiding hypoglycemia. Analyses were conducted to determine whether macimorelin performance is affected by age, BMI, or sex, and evaluate its performance vs ITT over a range of GH cutpoints., Design: Post hoc analyses of data from a previous randomized phase 3 study included participants aged 18-66 years with BMI <37 kg/m2 and high (Group A), intermediate (Group B), or low (Group C) likelihood for AGHD based on pituitary history, and matched controls (Group D)., Methods: Probability of AGHD was estimated using unadjusted, age-adjusted, BMI-adjusted, and sex-adjusted logistic models. Area under the curve (AUC) of the estimated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (range, 0-1; 1 = perfect) was compared for adjusted vs unadjusted models. Separate analyses evaluated agreement, sensitivity, and specificity for macimorelin and ITT using cutpoints of 2.8, 4.0, 5.1, and 6.5 ng/mL., Results: For participants in Group A (n = 41) and Group D (n = 29), unadjusted, age-adjusted, BMI-adjusted, and sex-adjusted models had ROC AUCs (95% CIs) of 0.9924 (0.9807-1), 0.9924 (0.9807-1), 0.9916 (0.9786-1), and 0.9950 (0.9861-1), respectively., Conclusions: Macimorelin performance was not meaningfully affected by age, BMI, or sex, indicating robustness for AGHD diagnosis. Of the 4 GH cutpoints evaluated, the cutpoint of 5.1 ng/mL provided maximal specificity (96%) and high sensitivity (92%) and was in good overall agreement with the ITT at the same cutpoint (87%).

Context: Hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor related to increased mortality in acromegaly. Surgical cure of acromegaly is associated with improvement in blood pressure levels, however little is known about the effect of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment in patients with hypertension. This analysis evaluates outcomes in patients with hypertension and acromegaly included in ACROSTUDY., Methods: ACROSTUDY is a global non-interventional surveillance study of long-term treatment with PEGV, monitoring its safety and efficacy. The cohort was retrospectively divided in two subgroups: patients with and without hypertension. Stepwise logistic regression and Kaplan-Meyer analyses were performed for testing predictors of mortality., Results: The total cohort included 2,090 patients with acromegaly treated with PEGV who were followed for a median of 6.8 years (range up to 12.1 years). In ACROSTUDY there were 1,344 patients with hypertension (52.3% males). This subgroup was older, had a higher BMI, and higher prevalence of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) when compared to patients without hypertension. During ACROSTUDY, 68 deaths were reported in the hypertension cohort, vs 10 in the cohort without hypertension. Both CVD (p<0.0001) and anterior pituitary deficiencies (p=0.0105) at study entry independently predicted mortality in patients with acromegaly and hypertension; Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that CVD significantly impairs survival., Conclusions: Hypertension is common in patients with acromegaly and significantly increases mortality, especially when there is concomitant CVD. These data suggest that treatment goals should extend beyond IGF-I normalization, and include optimisation of substitution of pituitary deficiencies and scrutinous screening and treatment of CVD., Competing Interests: GV has received research grants to her institution from Chiasma and Novartis, and consultancy- and/or speakers fees from Pfizer, Novartis and Ipsen. AL has received lecture and/or consulting honoraria from Ipsen, Novartis, and Pfizer; research grants to the Medical University of Vienna from Ipsen and Pfizer. AJL has received grants, consultancy- and speaker’s fees from Pfizer. SN has received research grants and speaker fees from Ipsen, Novartis, and Pfizer, and consulting fees from Ipsen. SW has received honoraria as a member of the Acrostudy Advisory Board, and lecture fees from Pfizer, Novartis and Ipsen. BB has served as PI of research grants from Novartis, Crinetics and Ionis to Massachusetts General Hospital and has received occasional consulting honoraria from Novartis, Crinetics and Pfizer. SV and JH-H are Pfizer employees., (Copyright © 2020 Vila, Luger, van der Lely, Neggers, Webb, Biller, Valluri and Hey-Hadavi.)

Background: Cushing's disease is a rare endocrine disorder characterised by cortisol overproduction with severe complications. Therapies for cortisol reduction are often necessary. Here we report the outcomes from the pivotal phase III study of osilodrostat (a potent oral inhibitor of cytochrome P450 11B1, mitochondrial [11β-hydroxylase]; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) in patients with Cushing's disease., Methods: LINC 3 was a prospective, multicentre, open-label, phase III study with a double-blind randomised withdrawal period, that comprised four periods. Patients aged 18-75 years, with confirmed persistent or recurrent Cushing's disease (defined as mean 24-h urinary free cortisol [UFC] concentration >1·5 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] and morning plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone above the lower limit of normal) who had previously had pituitary surgery or irradiation, or were newly diagnosed and who refused surgery or were not surgical candidates, were recruited from 66 hospital sites and private clinical practices in 19 countries. In period 1, open-label osilodrostat was initiated in all participants and adjusted every 2 weeks (1-30 mg twice daily; film-coated tablets for oral administration) on the basis of mean 24-h UFC concentration and safety until week 12. In period 2, weeks 13-24, osilodrostat was continued at the therapeutic dose determined during period 1. In period 3, beginning at week 26, participants who had a mean 24-h UFC concentration of less than or equal to the ULN at week 24, without up-titration after week 12, were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive-response technology, stratified by osilodrostat dose at week 24 and history of pituitary irradiation, to continue osilodrostat or switch to placebo for 8 weeks. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Ineligible participants continued open-label osilodrostat. In period 4, weeks 35-48, all participants were given open-label osilodrostat until core-study end. The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of osilodrostat versus placebo at the end of period 3. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who had been randomly assigned to treatment or placebo with a complete response (ie, mean 24-h UFC concentration of ≤ULN) at the end of the randomised withdrawal period (week 34), without up-titration during this period. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a complete response at the end of the single-arm, open-label period (ie, period 2, week 24) without up-titration during weeks 13-24. Analysis was by intention-to-treat for all patients who received at least one dose of osilodrostat (full analysis set; key secondary endpoint) or randomised treatment (randomised analysis set; primary endpoint) and safety was assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of osilodrostat and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. LINC 3 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02180217, and is now complete., Findings: Between Nov 12, 2014, and March 22, 2017, 202 patients were screened and 137 were enrolled. The median age was 40·0 years (31·0-49·0) and 106 (77%) participants were female. 72 (53%) participants were eligible for randomisation during the withdrawal phase, of whom 36 were assigned to continue osilodrostat and 35 were assigned to placebo; one patient was not randomly assigned due to investigator decision and continued open-label osilodrostat. More patients maintained a complete response with osilodrostat versus with placebo at week 34 (31 [86%] vs ten [29%]; odds ratio 13·7 [95% CI 3·7-53·4]; p<0·0001). At week 24, 72 (53%; 95% CI 43·9-61·1) of 137 patients maintained a complete response without up-titration after week 12. Most common adverse events (ie, occurred in >25% of participants) were nausea (57 [42%]), headache (46 [34%]), fatigue (39 [28%]), and adrenal insufficiency (38 [28%]). Hypocortisolism occurred in 70 (51%) patients and adverse events related to adrenal hormone precursors occurred in 58 (42%) patients. One patient died, unrelated to study drug, after the core study phase., Interpretation: Twice-daily osilodrostat rapidly reduced mean 24-h UFC and sustained this reduction alongside improvements in clinical signs of hypercortisolism; it was also generally well tolerated. Osilodrostat is an effective new treatment option that is approved in Europe for the treatment of endogenous Cushing's syndrome and in the USA for Cushing's disease., Funding: Novartis Pharma AG., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Medical therapy has an adjunctive role in management of Cushing disease. Medical therapy is recommended for patients who received pituitary radiotherapy and are awaiting its salutary effects. Medications are used preoperatively to stabilize the condition of seriously ill patients before surgery. Medical therapy is used to control hypercortisolism in patients with uncertain tumor location. Medical therapies available for management of patients with Cushing disease include steroidogenesis inhibitors, centrally acting agents, and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists. All agents require careful monitoring to optimize clinical effectiveness and manage adverse effects. Novel agents in development may expand the armamentarium for management of this condition., Competing Interests: Disclosure N.A. Tritos has received institution-directed research support from Ipsen and Novartis. B.M.K. Biller has received institution-directed research support from Millendo, Novartis, and Strongbridge and occasional consulting honoraria from Novartis and Strongbridge., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: The diagnosis of Cushing syndrome (CS) can be challenging. It remains to be determined which diagnostic tests are the most accurate., Objective: To summarize the accuracy of diagnostic tests for CS using contemporary meta-analytic techniques (hierarchical models)., Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews (inception until August 3, 2018)., Study Selection: Studies performed in adults that determined the accuracy of one or more diagnostic tests: overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST), 2-day low-dose DST (2d DST), 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC), late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), midnight serum cortisol (MSC), and the dexamethasone-suppressed CRH (dex-CRH) and desmopressin (dex-DDAVP) tests., Data Extraction: Two authors independently extracted data and performed methodological assessments., Data Synthesis: One hundred thirty-nine studies (14 140 participants) were included in the analysis. The respective sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) estimates include the following: DST 98.6% (96.9%-99.4%), 90.6% (86.4%-93.6%), 10.5 (7.2-15.3), and 0.016 (0.007-0.035); 2d DST 95.3% (91.3%-97.5%), 92.8% (85.7%-96.5%), 13.2 (6.47-27.1), and 0.051 (0.027-0.095); UFC 94.0% (91.6%-95.7%), 93.0% (89.0%-95.5%), 13.3 (8.47-21.0), and 0.065 (0.046-0.092); LNSC 95.8% (93.%-97.2%), 93.4% (90.7%-95.4%), 14.6 (10.3-20.7), and 0.045 (0.030-0.066); MSC 96.1% (93.5%-97.6%), 93.2% (88.1%-96.3%), 14.2 (7.96-25.2), and 0.042 (0.026-0.069); and dex-CRH 98.6% (90.4%-99.8%), 85.9% (67.6%-94.7%), 7.0 (2.80-17.6), and 0.016 (0.002-0.118). A single study evaluated dex-DDAVP. Meta-regression and a novel network meta-analytic approach suggest that DST is the most sensitive while UFC is the least sensitive., Conclusions: All of the included diagnostic tests for CS are highly sensitive and specific. It appears that the DST is the most sensitive while the UFC is less sensitive. The specificity of all first-line tests appears comparable., (© Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: The aim of the Acromegaly Consensus Group was to revise and update the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities last published in 2013., Participants: The Consensus Group, convened by 11 Steering Committee members, consisted of 45 experts in the medical and surgical management of acromegaly. The authors received no corporate funding or remuneration., Evidence: This evidence-based consensus was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence following critical discussion of the current literature on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities., Consensus Process: Acromegaly Consensus Group participants conducted comprehensive literature searches for English-language papers on selected topics, reviewed brief presentations on each topic, and discussed current practice and recommendations in breakout groups. Consensus recommendations were developed based on all presentations and discussions. Members of the Scientific Committee graded the quality of the supporting evidence and the consensus recommendations using the GRADE system., Conclusions: Evidence-based approach consensus recommendations address important clinical issues regarding multidisciplinary management of acromegaly-related cardiovascular, endocrine, metabolic, and oncologic comorbidities, sleep apnea, and bone and joint disorders and their sequelae, as well as their effects on quality of life and mortality., (© Endocrine Society 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Context: Growth hormone (GH) replacement requires daily GH injections, which is burdensome for some adult patients with GH deficiency (AGHD)., Objective: To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, versus placebo in AGHD., Design: Randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) phase 3 trial, REAL 1 (NCT02229851)., Setting: Clinics in 17 countries., Patients: Treatment-naïve patients with AGHD (n = 301 main study period, 272 extension period); 257 patients completed the trial., Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once-weekly somapacitan, daily GH, or once-weekly placebo for 34 weeks (main period). During the 52-week extension period, patients continued treatment with somapacitan or daily GH., Main Outcome Measures: Body composition measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The primary endpoint was change in truncal fat percentage to week 34. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) standard deviation score (SDS) values were used to dose titrate., Results: At 34 weeks, somapacitan significantly reduced truncal fat percentage (estimated difference: -1.53% [-2.68; -0.38]; P = 0.0090), demonstrating superiority compared with placebo, and it improved other body composition parameters (including visceral fat and lean body mass) and IGF-I SDS. At 86 weeks, improvements were maintained with both somapacitan and daily GH. Somapacitan was well tolerated, with similar adverse events (including injection-site reactions) compared with daily GH., Conclusions: In AGHD patients, somapacitan administered once weekly demonstrated superiority over placebo, and the overall treatment effects and safety of somapacitan were in accordance with known effects and safety of GH replacement for up to 86 weeks of treatment. Somapacitan may provide an effective alternative to daily GH in AGHD. A short visual summary of our work is available (1)., (© Endocrine Society 2020.)

Objective: To examine all-cause mortality rates in patients with acromegaly on pegvisomant and identify pertinent risk factors, including insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)., Design: Retrospective cohort analysis of data from ACROSTUDY (global surveillance study of patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant)., Methods: Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression techniques were used to examine survival rates. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) with reference to general population (WHO GBD 2016) were estimated. Multiplicative multiple Poisson regression models were used to characterize the association between SMR, IGF-I, and other risk factors associated with mortality risk., Results: The study consisted of 2077 subjects who were followed for a median interval of 4.1 years, contributing to 8957 patient-years. Higher on-treatment IGF-I (P = 0.0035), older attained age (P < 0.0001), and longer duration of acromegaly (>10 years) before starting pegvisomant (P = 0.05) were associated with higher mortality rates. In reference to general population rates, higher SMR (1.10, 1.42, and 2.62, at attained age 55 years) were observed with higher serum IGF-I category (SMR trend: 1.44 (44%)/per fold level of IGF-I/ULN (95% CI: 1.10, 1.87), P = 0.0075). SMR increased per year of younger attained age (1.04 (1.02-1.04), P < 0.0001) and were higher for longer disease duration (>10 years) before starting pegvisomant (1.57 (1.02, 2.43), P = 0.042). Serum IGF-I levels within the normal range during pegvisomant therapy were associated with all-cause mortality rates that were indistinguishable from the general population., Conclusions: Higher on-treatment IGF-I, older attained age, and longer duration of acromegaly before starting pegvisomant are associated with higher all-cause mortality rates. Younger patients with uncontrolled acromegaly have higher excess all-cause mortality rates in comparison with older patients.