Search

Objectives: Exposure to prehospital rearrest has previously been associated with mortality following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association between prehospital rearrest and survival in adults following OHCA resuscitation., Methods: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science bibliographic databases for observational studies that included adult OHCA patients who achieved return of spontaneous circulation in the prehospital setting following OHCA and reported survival to hospital discharge data stratified by rearrest status. The primary exposure was prehospital rearrest. The primary outcome for this study was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival with a favorable neurological outcome and rearrest prevalence. We pooled data using inverse heterogeneity modeling and presented effect sizes for the survival outcomes as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity using Cochran's Q and the I 2 statistic and examined small study effects using Doi plots and the LFK index., Results: Of the 84 publications screened, we included 7 observational studies containing 27,045 patients with survival to hospital discharge data. Rearrest was common (30% [18-43%]; n  = 7 studies; Q  = 1086.1, p < 0.001; I 2 = 99%; LFK index = 1.21) and associated with both decreased odds of survival to discharge (pooled aOR: 0.27 [0.22, 0.33]; n  = 7 studies; Q  = 32.2, p < 0.01, I 2 = 81%, LFK index = -0.08) and decreased odds of survival to discharge with a favorable neurological outcome (pooled aOR: 0.25, [0.22, 0.28]; n  = 4 studies; Q  = 3.5, p = 0.3; I 2 = 13%, LFK index = 1.30)., Conclusions: Rearrest is common and associated with decreased survival following OHCA. The pooled result of this meta-analysis suggests that preventing rearrest in five patients would be necessary to save one life.

Introduction: An acute spinal cord injury (SCI) results in significant morbidity worldwide. Guidelines recommend mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation to prevent hypoperfusion. Although there is no consensus on a single vasoactive agent for MAP augmentation, intravenous vasopressors are commonly utilized, requiring an intensive care unit (ICU). Beyond the financial burden for patients, ICU stays require significant hospital system resource utilization. Oral vasoactive agents, such as pseudoephedrine and midodrine, are also utilized for MAP augmentation, but little data on their efficacy are available. This study investigates the use and dosing of oral vasoactive agents as an alternative in MAP augmentation in SCI., Materials and Methods: Adult SCI patients were retrospectively investigated. Total daily vasoactive dose, treatment efficacy, and ICU length of stay were evaluated., Results: 141 patients were evaluated, with 7.1% receiving oral agents alone, and 80.9% receiving vasopressors who either transitioned to pseudoephedrine, pseudoephedrine plus midodrine, or no oral agent. Patients receiving oral agents trended toward decreased ICU stay, but there was no difference in vasopressor duration. Similar MAP goal success rates were found between groups. A variety of initial and maximum daily doses of PO agents were used. Median doses were 120 mg pseudoephedrine and 30 mg midodrine. Early initiation of pseudoephedrine resulted in shorter ICU stays., Conclusions: This study demonstrated shorter ICU length of stay and similar MAP goal success with PO agents as compared to vasopressors. This may indicate these medications could be utilized to decrease the financial burden placed on patients and the health care system from lengthy ICU courses. This study is limited by a small sample size and variable agent dosing., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) is a potentially lifesaving therapy for patients who present in the prehospital setting with bradycardia that is causing hemodynamic compromise. Our objective was to examine the outcomes of patients who received prehospital TCP and identify predictors of TCP failure., Methods: We utilized the 2018-2021 ESO Data Collaborative public use research datasets for this study. All patients without a documented TCP attempt were excluded. Mortality was derived from hospital disposition data. TCP failure was defined as the initiation of CPR following the first TCP attempt among patients who did not receive CPR prior to the first TCP attempt. Multivariable logistic regression models using age and sex as covariables were used to explore the association between prehospital vital signs and TCP failure., Results: During the study period, 13,270 patients received transcutaneous pacing and 2560 of these patients had outcome data available. Overall, the mortality rate following TCP was 63.4%. Among patients who did not receive CPR prior to the first TCP attempt ( n  = 7930), TCP failure (progression to cardiac arrest) occurred 20.4% of the time. Factors associated with TCP failure included increased body weight (>100 vs. 60-100 kg, aOR: 1.33 (1.15, 1.55)), a pre-pacing non-bradycardic heart rate (>50 vs. <40 bpm, aOR: 2.87 (2.39, 3.44)), and pre-TCP hypoxia (<80% vs. >90% SpO 2 , aOR: 6.01 (4.96, 7.29))., Conclusions: Patients who undergo prehospital TCP are at high risk of mortality. Progression to cardiac arrest is common and associated with factors including increased weight, a non-bradycardic initial heart rate and pre-TCP hypoxia.

Background: Timely identification of high-risk pediatric trauma patients and appropriate resource mobilization may lead to improved outcomes. We hypothesized that reverse shock index times the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (rSIM) would perform equivalently to reverse shock index times the total GCS (rSIG) in the prediction of mortality and the need for intervention following pediatric trauma., Methods: The 2017-2020 National Trauma Data Bank data sets were used. We included all patients 16 years or younger who had a documented prehospital and trauma bay systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and total GCS. We excluded all patients who arrived at the trauma center without vital signs and interfacility transport patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to model the performance of each metric as a classifier with respect to our primary and secondary outcomes, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used for comparison. Our primary outcome was mortality before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included blood product administration or hemorrhage control intervention (surgery or angiography) <4 hours following hospital arrival and intensive care unit admission., Results: After application of exclusion criteria, 77,996 patients were included in our analysis. Reverse shock index times GCS-motor and rSIG performed equivalently as predictors of mortality in the 1- to 2- ( p = 0.05) and 3- to 5-year-old categories ( p = 0.28), but rSIM was statistically outperformed by rSIG in the 6- to 12- (AUROC, 0.96 vs. 0.95; p = 0.04) and 13- to 16-year-old age categories (AUROC, 0.96 vs. 0.95; p < 0.01). Reverse shock index times GCS-motor and rSIG also performed similarly with respect to prediction of secondary outcomes., Conclusion: Reverse shock index times GCS-total and rSIM are both outstanding predictors of mortality following pediatric trauma. Statistically significant differences in favor of rSIG were noted in some age groups. Because of the simplicity of calculation, rSIM may be a useful tool for pediatric trauma triage., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To improve rural and austere trauma care, hospital-based testing performed at the point of injury may shorten the time lapsed from injury to intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the TEG6s device (Haemonetics(R), Clinton, PA) in a rotary wing aircraft. Prior attempts suffered from limitation related to lack of vibration mitigation., Methods: This was an investigator-initiated, industry-supported study. Haemonetics provided a TEG6s analyzer. The device underwent a standard validation. It was secured in place on the aircraft using shipping foam for vibration mitigation. Donors provided two tubes of sample blood in one sitting. Paired studies were performed on the aircraft during level flight and in the hospital, using the Global Hemostasis with Lysis Cartridge(Haemonetics (R), Clinton, PA). Both normal and presumed pathologic samples were tested in separate phases. Paired t tests were performed., Results: For normal donors, the mean R for laboratory compared with the aircraft was 6.2 minutes versus 7.2 minutes ( p = 0.025). The mean ± SD Citrated Rapid TEG Maximum Amplitude (CRT MA) was 59.3 ± 5.6 mm and 55.9 ± 7.3 mm ( p < 0.001) for laboratory and aircraft ( p < 0.001). Among normal donors, R was within normal range for 17 of 18 laboratory tests and 18 of 18 aircraft tests ( p > 0.99). During the testing of pathologic samples, the mean R time was 14.8 minutes for laboratory samples and 12.6 minutes for aircraft ( p = 0.02). Aircraft samples were classified as abnormal in 78% of samples; this was not significantly different than laboratory samples ( p = 0.5)., Conclusion: The use of the TEG6s for inflight viscoelastic testing appears promising. While statistically significant differences are seen in some results, these values are not considered clinically significant. Classifying samples as normal or abnormal demonstrated a higher correlation. Future studies should focus on longer flight times to evaluate for LY30, takeoff, and landing effects. Overall, this study suggests that TEG6s can be used in a prehospital environment, and further study is warranted., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Background: Prehospital post-resuscitation hypotension and hypoxia have been associated with adverse outcomes in the context of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to investigate the association between clinical outcomes and post-resuscitation hypoxia alone, hypotension alone, and combined hypoxia and hypotension., Methods: We used the 2018-2021 ESO annual datasets to conduct this study. All EMS-treated non-traumatic OHCA patients who had a documented prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and two or more SpO 2 readings and systolic blood pressures recorded were evaluated for inclusion. Patients who were less than 18 years of age, pregnant, had a do-not-resuscitate order or similar, achieved ROSC after bystander CPR only, or had an EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for standard Utstein factors and highest prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was used to investigate the association between hypoxia, hypotension, and outcomes., Results: We analyzed data for 17,943 patients, of whom 3,979 had hospital disposition data. Hypotension and hypoxia were not documented in 1,343 (33.8%) patients, 1,144 (28.8%) had only hypoxia documented, 507 (12.7%) had only hypotension documented, and 985 (24.8%) had both hypoxia and hypotension documented. In comparison to patients who did not have documented hypotension or hypoxia, patients who had documented hypoxia (aOR: 1.76 [1.38, 2.24]), documented hypotension (aOR: 3.00 [2.15, 4.18]), and documented hypoxia and hypotension combined (aOR: 4.87 [3.63, 6.53]) had significantly increased mortality. The relationship between mortality and vital sign abnormalities (hypoxia and hypotension > hypotension > hypoxia) was observed in every evaluated subgroup., Conclusions: In this large dataset, hypotension and hypoxia were independently associated with mortality both alone and in combination. Compared to patients without documented hypotension and hypoxia, patients with documented hypotension and hypoxia had nearly five-fold greater odds of mortality.

Introduction: While various supraglottic airway devices are available for use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation, comparisons of patient outcomes by device are limited. In this study, we aimed to compare outcomes of OHCA patients who had airway management by emergency medical services (EMS) with the iGel or King-LT., Methods: We used the 2018-2021 ESO Data Collaborative public use research datasets for this retrospective study. All patients with non-traumatic OHCA who had iGels or King-LTs inserted by EMS were included. Our primary outcome was survival to discharge to home, and secondary outcomes included first-pass success, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and prehospital rearrest. We examined the association between airway device and each outcome using two-level mixed effects logistic regression with EMS agency as the random effect, adjusted for standard Utstein variables and failed intubation prior to supraglottic airway insertion. Average treatment effects were calculated through propensity score matching., Results: A total of 286,192 OHCA patients were screened, resulting in 93,866 patients eligible for inclusion in this analysis. A total of 9,456 transported patients (59.8% iGel) had associated hospital disposition data. Use of the iGel was associated with greater survival to discharge to home (aOR:1.36 [1.06, 1.76]; ATE: 2.2%[+0.5, +3.8]; n = 7,576), first pass airway success (aOR:1.94 [1.79, 2.09]; n = 73,658), and ROSC (aOR:1.19 [1.13, 1.26]; n = 73,207) in comparison to airway management with the King-LT. iGel use was associated with lower odds of experiencing a rearrest (aOR:0.73 [0.67, 0.79]; n = 20,776). Among patients who received a supraglottic device as a primary airway, use of the iGel was not associated with significantly greater survival to discharge to home (aOR:1.26 [0.95, 1.68]). Among patients who received a supraglottic device as a rescue airway following failed intubation, use of the iGel was associated with greater odds of survival to discharge to home (aOR:2.16 [1.15, 4.04])., Conclusion: In this dataset, use of the iGel during adult OHCA resuscitation was associated overall with better outcomes compared to use of the King-LT. Subgroup analyses suggested that use of the iGel was associated with greater odds of achieving the primary outcome than the King-LT when used as a rescue device but not when used as the primary airway management device.

Objective: End tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) is often used to assess ventilation and perfusion during cardiac arrest resuscitation. However, few data exist evaluating the relationship between ETCO 2 values and mortality in the context of contemporary resuscitation practices. We aimed to explore the association between ETCO 2 and mortality following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)., Methods: We used the 2018-2021 ESO annual datasets to query all non-traumatic OHCA patients with attempted resuscitation. Patients with documented DNR/POLST, EMS-witnessed arrest, ROSC after bystander CPR only, or < 2 documented ETCO 2 values were excluded. The lowest and highest ETCO 2 values recorded during the total prehospital interval, in addition to the pre- and post-ROSC intervals for resuscitated patients, were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, initial rhythm, witnessed status, bystander CPR, etiology, OHCA location, sodium bicarbonate administration, number of milligrams of epinephrine administered, and response interval were used to evaluate the association between measures of ETCO 2 and mortality., Results: Hospital outcome data were available for 14,122 patients, and 2,209 (15.6%) were classified as surviving to discharge. Compared to patients with maximum prehospital ETCO 2 values of 30-40 mmHg, odds of mortality were increased for patients with maximum prehospital ETCO 2 values of <20 mmHg (aOR: 3.5 [2.1, 5,9]), 20-29 mmHg (aOR: 1.5 [1.1, 2.1]), and >50 mmHg (aOR: 1.5 [1.2, 1.8]). After 20 minutes of ETCO 2 monitoring, <12% of patients had ETCO 2 values <10 mmHg. This cutpoint was 96.7% specific and 6.9% sensitive for mortality., Conclusion: In this dataset, both high and low ETCO 2 values were associated with increased mortality. Contemporary resuscitation practices may make low ETCO 2 values uncommon, and field termination decision algorithms should not use ETCO 2 values in isolation.

Introduction: Traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (tOHCA) has a mortality rate over 95%. Many current protocols dictate rapid intra-arrest transport of these patients. We hypothesized that on-scene advanced life support (ALS) would increase the odds of arriving at the emergency department with ROSC (ROSC at ED) in comparison to performance of no ALS or ALS en route., Methods: We utilized the 2018-2021 ESO Research Collaborative public use datasets for this study, which contain patient care records from ~2000 EMS agencies across the US. All OHCA patients with an etiology of "trauma" or "exsanguination" were screened (n=15,691). The time of advanced airway management, vascular access, and chest decompression was determined for each patient. Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate the association of ALS intervention timing with ROSC at ED., Results: 4942 patients met inclusion criteria. 14.6% of patients had ROSC at ED. In comparison to no vascular access, on-scene (aOR: 2.14 [1.31, 3.49]) but not en route vascular access was associated with increased odds of having ROSC at ED arrival. In comparison to no chest decompression, neither en route nor on-scene chest decompression were associated with ROSC at ED arrival. Similarly, in comparison to no advanced airway management, neither en route nor on-scene advanced airway management were associated with ROSC at ED arrival. The odds of ROSC at ED decreased by 3% (aOR: 0.97 [0.94, 0.99]) for every 1-minute increase in time to vascular access and decreased by 5% (aOR: 0.95 [0.94, 0.99]) for every 1-minute increase in time to epinephrine., Conclusion: On-scene ALS interventions were associated with increased ROSC at ED in our study. These data suggest that initiating ALS prior to rapid transport to definitive care in the setting of tOHCA may increase the number of patients with a palpable pulse at ED arrival., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Objective: Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used during the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in the United States and worldwide. In this study, we aimed to compare the neurologic outcomes of OHCA patients managed with the King Laryngeal Tube (King LT) to the neurologic outcomes of patients managed with the iGel., Methods: We used the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) public use research dataset for our analysis. Non-traumatic OHCA cases with attempted EMS resuscitation enrolled from 2013-2021 were included. We used two-level mixed effects multivariable logistic regression analyses with treating EMS agency as the random effect to determine the association between supraglottic airway device and outcome. The primary outcome was survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge. Age, sex, calendar year of OHCA, initial ECG rhythm, witnessed status (unwitnessed, bystander witnessed, 9-1-1 responder witnessed), bystander CPR, response interval, and OHCA location (private/home, public, institutional) were used as covariables., Results: In comparison to use of the King LT, use of the iGel was associated with greater neurologically favorable survival (aOR: 1.45 [1.33, 1.58]). In addition, use of the iGel was associated with greater survival to hospital admission (1.07 [1.02, 1.12]) and survival to hospital discharge (1.35 [1.26, 1.46])., Conclusions: This study adds to the body of literature suggesting that use of the iGel during OHCA resuscitation is associated with better outcomes than use of the King LT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The design of this study was reviewed by an independent committee before access to the data was granted free of charge. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the results reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Prehospital tourniquet application is not a standard trauma team activation (TTA) criterion recommended by the ACS COT. Tourniquet use has seen a resurgence recently with associated risks and benefits of more liberal usage. Our institution added tourniquet application as TTA criterion in January 2019. This study aimed to evaluate the effect this would have on patient care and overtriage., Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted for all TTA associated with tourniquets placed during 2019. An overtriage analysis was conducted utilizing a modified Cribari method as described in Resources for the Optimal Care of the Injured Patient, comparing patients that met standard TTA criteria (TTA-S), to those who met criteria due to tourniquet placement (TTA-T)., Results: During the study, there were 46 TTA with tourniquets. Mean prehospital tourniquet time was 80 minutes. Median ISS was 10, 8 (17%) had an ISS >15. Urgent operative intervention was needed in 74%, with 23% and 21% requiring orthopedic and vascular procedures, respectively. Tourniquets were correctly placed in 80% and clinically appropriate in 57%. Of these subjects, 25 (54%) were TTA-S and 21 TTA-T. Overtriage analysis was performed. Overtriage for TTA-T was 33.3%. Overtriage among TTA-S was 4%., Conclusion: Patients with prehospital tourniquets are frequently severely injured. The immediate presence of a trauma surgeon can have significant impacts in these cases. This is particularly important in a rural environment with long tourniquet times. Prehospital tourniquet application as a TTA criteria does not result in excessive overtriage.

Background: Hypoxia and hyperoxia following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)may cause harm by exacerbating secondary brain injury. Our objective was to retrospectively examine theassociationof prehospital post-ROSC hypoxia and hyperoxia with the primary outcome of survival to discharge home., Methods: We utilized the 2019-2021 ESO Data Collaborative public use research datasets for this study (ESO, Austin, TX). Average prehospital SpO 2 , lowest recorded prehospital SpO 2 , and hypoxia dose were calculated for each patient. Theassociationof these measures with survival was explored using multivariable logistic regression. We also evaluated theassociationof American Heart Association (AHA) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) recommended post-ROSC SpO 2 target ranges with outcome., Results: After application of exclusion criteria, 19,023 patients were included in this study. Of these, 52.3% experienced at least one episode of post-ROSC hypoxia (lowest SpO 2  < 90%) and 19.6% experienced hyperoxia (average SpO 2  > 98%). In comparison to normoxic patients, patients who were hypoxic on average (AHA aOR: 0.31 [0.25, 0.38]; ERC aOR: 0.34 [0.28, 0.42]) and patients who had a hypoxic lowest recorded SpO 2 (AHA aOR: 0.48 [0.39, 0.59]; ERC aOR: 0.52 [0.42, 0.64]) had lower adjusted odds of survival. Patients who had a hyperoxic average SpO 2 (AHA aOR: 0.75 [0.59, 0.96]; ERC aOR: 0.68 [0.53, 0.88]) and patients who had a hyperoxic lowest recorded SpO 2 (AHA aOR: 0.66 [0.48, 0.92]; ERC aOR: 0.65 [0.46, 0.92]) also had lower adjusted odds of survival., Conclusion: Prehospital post-ROSC hypoxia and hyperoxia were associated with worse outcomes in this dataset., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We aimed to examine social inequalities in participation in cervical cancer screening (CCS) in a metropolitan area by implementing a pilot organised screening programme. The pilot programme consisted of sending invitations to women who did not perform a pap smear within the past 3 years, managing interventions to reach vulnerable women, training healthcare professionals, and organising follow-ups of abnormal pap smears. Methods: We studied participation in CCS between January 2014 and December 2016 among 241,257 women aged 25-63 years old. To assess relative inequalities, Odds Ratios were computed using multilevel logistic regression. To assess absolute inequalities, the CCS coverage and the rate difference were calculated. Inequalities were computed by age and neighbourhood characteristics (social deprivation and proportion of single women). Results: Disparities in participation in CCS were observed by age and social deprivation. For overall screening compared to opportunistic screening, disparities by age were larger (OR25-35&#95;vs.&#95;55-64 = 2.13 [2.08-2.19] compared to 2.02 [1.96-2.07]), but disparities by social deprivation were decreased (OR10%&#95;most&#95;vs.&#95;10%&#95;least&#95;deprived = 2.09 [1.90-2.30] compared to 2.22 [2.02-2.44]). Conclusion: Disparities in CCS participation remain despite the organised programme. To reduce these inequalities, free screening should be proposed and evaluated., Competing Interests: Authors CA, JB, GA, JN, and MD were employed by CRCDC-IDF. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial of financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Audiger, Bovagnet, Bardes, Abihsera, Nicolet, Deghaye, Bochaton and Menvielle.)

Background: Tourniquet use for extremity hemorrhage control has seen a recent increase in civilian usage. Previous retrospective studies demonstrated that tourniquets improve outcomes for major extremity trauma (MET). No prospective study has been conducted to date. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in MET patients with prehospital tourniquet use. We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet use in MET decreases the incidence of patients arriving to the trauma center in shock., Methods: Data were collected prospectively for adult patients with MET at 26 Level I and 3 Level II trauma centers from 2015 to 2020. Limbs with tourniquets applied in the prehospital setting were included in the tourniquet group and limbs without prehospital tourniquets were enrolled in the control group., Results: A total of 1,392 injured limbs were enrolled with 1,130 tourniquets, including 962 prehospital tourniquets. The control group consisted of 262 limbs without prehospital tourniquets and 88 with tourniquets placed upon hospital arrival. Prehospital improvised tourniquets were placed in 42 patients. Tourniquets effectively controlled bleeding in 87.7% of limbs. Tourniquet and control groups were similarly matched for demographics, Injury Severity Score, and prehospital vital signs (p > 0.05). Despite higher limb injury severity, patients in the tourniquet group were less likely to arrive in shock compared with the control group (13.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.04). The incidence of limb complications was not significantly higher in the tourniquet group (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: This study is the first prospective analysis of prehospital tourniquet use for civilian extremity trauma. Prehospital tourniquet application was associated with decreased incidence of arrival in shock without increasing limb complications. We found widespread tourniquet use, high effectiveness, and a low number of improvised tourniquets. This study provides further evidence that tourniquets are being widely and safely adopted to improve outcomes in civilians with MET., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV., (Copyright © 2022 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer burden worldwide. In France, it is the second most common cause of cancer death after lung cancer. Systematic uptake of CRC screening can improve survival rates. However, people with limited health literacy (HL) and lower socioeconomic position rarely participate. Our aim is to assess the impact of an intervention combining HL and CRC screening training for general practitioners (GPs) with a pictorial brochure and video targeting eligible patients, to increase CRC screening and other secondary outcomes, after 1 year, in several underserved geographic areas in France., Methods: We will use a two-arm multicentric randomized controlled cluster trial with 32 GPs primarily serving underserved populations across four regions in France with 1024 patients recruited. GPs practicing in underserved areas (identified using the European Deprivation Index) will be block-randomized to: 1) a combined intervention (HL and CRC training + brochure and video for eligible patients), or 2) usual care. Patients will be included if they are between 50 and 74 years old, eligible for CRC screening, and present to recruited GPs. The primary outcome is CRC screening uptake after 1 year. Secondary outcomes include increasing knowledge and patient activation. After trial recruitment, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with up to 24 GPs (up to 8 in each region) and up to 48 patients (6 to 12 per region) based on data saturation. We will explore strategies that promote the intervention's sustained use and rapid implementation using Normalization Process Theory. We will follow a community-based participatory research approach throughout the trial. For the analyses, we will adopt a regression framework for all quantitative data. We will also use exploratory mediation analyses. We will analyze all qualitative data using a framework analysis guided by Normalization Process Theory., Discussion: Limited HL and its impact on the general population is a growing public health and policy challenge worldwide. It has received limited attention in France. A combined HL intervention could reduce disparities in CRC screening, increase screening rates among the most vulnerable populations, and increase knowledge and activation (beneficial in the context of repeated screening)., Trial Registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov., Trial Registration Number: 2020-A01687-32 . Date of registration: 17th November 2020., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Operative trauma volume for general surgery residents (GSR) continues to decline. This pilot study examines the impact of utilizing perfused cadavers in trauma surgical skills training for GSR., Methods: GSR (post graduate year (PGY) 1 through 4) participated in trauma surgical skills training utilizing perfused cadavers. GSR completed surveys assessing confidence in their ability to perform critical procedures before and after training., Results: Sixteen GSR participated in trauma skills training. All PGY 1-2, reported increases in confidence in skills. PGY 4 GSR reported significant increase in confidence in most skills sets including surgical airway, resuscitative thoracotomy/cardiac injury, and abdominal vascular injury. The majority of GSR retained confidence in these skills at 6 months., Conclusions: Integration of perfused cadavers into GSR curriculum provides high fidelity and dynamic model for training trauma surgical skills. Studies are needed for development and validation of this training and assessment method., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical management of traumatic duodenal injury remains challenging. While various surgical techniques have been described in the attempt to reduce complications and mortality, recent data suggests that surgical approach using less invasive procedures might be associated with improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the recent trend of surgical procedures performed for patients with duodenal injury and their outcome., Methods: A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2002 to 2014 was performed. A total of 2163 patients who sustained a traumatic duodenal injury requiring surgical intervention were included. Patient characteristics, injury data, procedures, and outcomes were examined. Types of duodenal procedures and patient outcomes were compared between two study periods (2002-2006 vs. 2007-2014)., Results: The median age was 27 (IQR 20-39), 78.9% were male, and 63.8% sustained penetrating duodenal injury. The median injury severity score was 18 (IQR 13-26). In patients with isolated duodenal injury, the later study period (2007-2014) was significantly associated with the increased use of primary repair (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.11-2.83, p = 0.017). Overall mortality was 11.7%. Patients in the later study group were significantly associated with lower odds of inhospital mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-0.95, p = 0.041)., Conclusions: A progressive trend toward less invasive procedures for duodenal injury was noted in the current study. Inhospital mortality has improved in the late study period.

A foreign body (FB) lodged in the esophagus is not uncommon. Although endoscopic removal is successful in the majority of cases, it could prove to be difficult in those whose foreign bodies are large or have been incarcerated for a long time. We describe the case of a 23-year-old woman who had a FB in her esophagus for at least 13 years. She became symptomatic 2 years before presentation, but presented for treatment when dysphagia to both solids and liquids developed. Endoscopic retrieval of the incarcerated FB was unsuccessful, and she eventually required thoracotomy and esophagotomy for its extraction., (Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 19-year-old female driver involved in a head on collision suffered a transection of her thoracic aorta secondary to blunt trauma. She was transported to the trauma center where a chest x-ray showed a widened mediastinum. IV contrast enhanced CT of the chest showed extravasation of contrast medium into the mediastinum. She was taken to the operating room for immediate and successful open surgical repair. Historically open repair of aortic transaction was the mainstay of treatment. Currently thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) may be a preferable method at many institutions. However the current devices are designed for aneurysmal disease and size may limit their use.

Public opposition to genetically modified (GM) food and crops is widely interpreted as the result of the public's misperception of the risks. With scientific assessment pointing to no unique risks from GM crops and foods, a strategy of accurate risk communication from trusted sources has been advocated. This is based on the assumption that the benefits of GM crops and foods are self-evident. Informed by the interpretation of some qualitative interviews with lay people, we use data from the Eurobarometer survey on biotechnology to explore the hypothesis that it is not so much the perception of risks as the absence of benefits that is the basis of the widespread rejection of GM foods and crops by the European public. Some respondents perceive both risks and benefits, and may be trading off these attributes along the lines of a rational choice model. However, for others, one attribute-benefit-appears to dominate their judgments: the lexicographic heuristic. For these respondents, their perception of risk is of limited importance in the formation of attitudes toward GM food and crops. The implication is that the absence of perceived benefits from GM foods and crops calls into question the relevance of risk communication strategies for bringing about change in public opinion.