Back to Search Start Over

AAST multicenter prospective analysis of prehospital tourniquet use for extremity trauma.

Authors :
Schroll R
Smith A
Alabaster K
Schroeppel TJ
Stillman ZE
Teicher EJ
Lita E
Ferrada P
Han J
Fullerton RD
McNickle AG
Fraser DR
Truitt MS
Grossman Verner HM
Todd SR
Turay D
Pop A
Godat LN
Costantini TW
Khor D
Inaba K
Bardes J
Wilson A
Myers JG
Haan JM
Lightwine KL
Berdel HO
Bottiggi AJ
Dorlac W
Zier L
Chang G
Lindner M
Martinez B
Tatum D
Fischer PE
Lieser M
Mabe RC
Lottenberg L
Velopoulos CG
Urban S
Duke M
Brown A
Peckham M
Gongola A
Enniss TM
Teixeira P
Kim DY
Singer G
Ekeh P
Hardman C
Askari R
Okafor B
Duchesne J
Source :
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery [J Trauma Acute Care Surg] 2022 Jun 01; Vol. 92 (6), pp. 997-1004. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 18.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Tourniquet use for extremity hemorrhage control has seen a recent increase in civilian usage. Previous retrospective studies demonstrated that tourniquets improve outcomes for major extremity trauma (MET). No prospective study has been conducted to date. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in MET patients with prehospital tourniquet use. We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet use in MET decreases the incidence of patients arriving to the trauma center in shock.<br />Methods: Data were collected prospectively for adult patients with MET at 26 Level I and 3 Level II trauma centers from 2015 to 2020. Limbs with tourniquets applied in the prehospital setting were included in the tourniquet group and limbs without prehospital tourniquets were enrolled in the control group.<br />Results: A total of 1,392 injured limbs were enrolled with 1,130 tourniquets, including 962 prehospital tourniquets. The control group consisted of 262 limbs without prehospital tourniquets and 88 with tourniquets placed upon hospital arrival. Prehospital improvised tourniquets were placed in 42 patients. Tourniquets effectively controlled bleeding in 87.7% of limbs. Tourniquet and control groups were similarly matched for demographics, Injury Severity Score, and prehospital vital signs (p > 0.05). Despite higher limb injury severity, patients in the tourniquet group were less likely to arrive in shock compared with the control group (13.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.04). The incidence of limb complications was not significantly higher in the tourniquet group (p > 0.05).<br />Conclusion: This study is the first prospective analysis of prehospital tourniquet use for civilian extremity trauma. Prehospital tourniquet application was associated with decreased incidence of arrival in shock without increasing limb complications. We found widespread tourniquet use, high effectiveness, and a low number of improvised tourniquets. This study provides further evidence that tourniquets are being widely and safely adopted to improve outcomes in civilians with MET.<br />Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2163-0763
Volume :
92
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35609289
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003555