Search

La locuzione “regione culturale” associa due termini che in geografia, così come in altre discipline sociali e umanistiche, sono stati messi in profonda discussione. Fino ad almeno tutti gli anni Sessanta del secolo scorso, tale espressione aveva una sua ragione d’essere ed era fulcro di studi e ricerche specifiche, sia sul piano teorico che applicativo. Ma con il passare del tempo, grazie alla terziarizzazione e informatizzazione dell’economia, all’intensificazione dei movimenti migratori, ai processi di urbanizzazione, alla diffusione capillare di tecnologie digitali, così come all’emergere di nuovi approcci scientifici che hanno rivoluzionato ontologie ed epistemologie consolidate, il concetto di regione culturale ha perso molto della sua ragione d’essere. Ha ancora senso, dunque, parlare oggi di regione culturale? In riferimento a quali aspetti e in quali termini? Questo capitolo intende dare risposta a tali interrogativi, dapprima esaminando il concetto di regione culturale nella sua evoluzione e nei suoi attuali possibili significati, quindi analizzando in profondità gli aspetti linguistici.

This article introduces the contributions collected in the special issue no. 1/2018 of “geotema” and presented at the 4th Study Day on Territorial Identities (Rome, September 22nd, 2017), promoted by the homonymous research group of the A.Ge.I. (Associations of Italian Geographers). The paper aims at discussing some basic questions on participatory processes, in order to pursue four objectives: 1) to recall some of the main issues that revolve around the topic of citizen participation in territorial decision-making processes; 2) to specify the ties between territorial identity (as intended by the research group) and participatory processes; 3) to highlight the questions raised by the contributions presented at the study day; 4) to propose an action for the professionalization of geographical skills in participation, with special reference to the Italian context.

After the bombings of 1943, the historic centre of Palermo was left with several crumbling buildings and a social situation of some concern. Therefore, over the last sixty years, all kinds of representations of Palermo have revolved around the presence of criminal organizations and the risks of living in the most dangerous areas of the city (including the city centre). These representations started to change around the beginning of the new century when the inner city of Palermo underwent an intense process of redefinition of its territorial identity. Several key factors may be used to explain this process: from traditional economic reasons concerning gentrification and touristification, to culture-led approaches and to urban policies that support the organization of megaevents (Manifesta 12, Italian Capital of Culture, etc.). Participation processes taking place in the city centre have also furthered the scope and range of these changes, trying to mark a distance from the past. This chapter aims to provide the results of ongoing action-research held in the inner city of Palermo, with the goal of describing the imageries that both local social actors, foreigners and tourists are shaping in their redefinition of what Palermo is or should be.