Search

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) collaborative project was initiated in 1993 by the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), with the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, several French public university and general hospitals, as well as private clinics and medical specialty societies. Its main objective is the development of serviceable clinical practice guidelines in order to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review, followed by a critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Draft guidelines are produced, then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery., Objectives: Produce clinical practice guidelines for the brachytherapy of prostate cancer using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project., Methods: The FNCLCC and the French Urology Association (AFU) first designated the multidisciplinary group of experts. Available data were collected by a search of Medline and lists selected by experts in the group. A first draft of the guidelines was written, they validated by independent reviewers., Results: The main recommendations are: 1/Brachytherapy with permanent seeds alone is a possible curative treatment for prostate cancer patients with the following prognosis factors: tumour stage T1 or T2a (TNM 1992), Gleason score < or = 6 and PSA < 10 micrograms/L. 2/Combined treatment with brachytherapy and hormonal therapy could be more efficient than brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer patients with Gleason score > 7 and/or PSA > 10.3/Combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy can be proposed to prostate cancer patients with intermediate prognosis. 4/Before and after seed implantation, risks of infection must be prevented by appropriate antibiotic therapy (recommendation). 5/Brachytherapy must not be performed within 2 months of transurethral prostate resection. 6/The height of the urethra receiving more than 200% of the prescribed dose must be reported. The portion of the rectum receiving 100 and 120% of the prescribed dose must be limited to 10 and 5 mm length, respectively.

Unlabelled: Although laparoscopic surgery now represents today an essential surgical technique, its use remains limited in urology and especially in pediatric urology for many reasons, main because of the lack of indications. After a large experience acquired in abdominal laparoscopic surgery, and because we were convinced of the advantages offered by this new mini-invasive approach, we have tried to develop it for the retroperitoneal space., Methods: Over a five-year period we performed 88 retroperitoneal procedures in children:--50 nephrectomies (44 total, 10 partial) for the following indications: 15 polycystic dysplastic kidney, 13 kidney destroyed by reflux, 18 by obstruction, hypertensive uropathy 3, pyonephrosis 1.--5 renal cystectomies, 3 pyelolithotomies, 2 pyeloureteral obstructions, 2 adrenalectomies, 1 retrocaval ureter, 25 varicoceles. The age range was 2 months to 16 years (mean: 3.7 years, 25 children under 1 year). The patients were placed in the lateral debubitus. The retroperitoneal space was created by dissection under direct vision, then insufflation was performed directly in the retroperitoneal space without balloon. Three or four ports were used except for varicocelectomy which was performed with only one port and an operating channel telescope., Results: Follow-up range was 6 months to 5 years. The mean operating time was 96 minutes (35 to 210 min.). Average postoperative stay was 2 days. Conversion was needed in 7 cases (8%). Operative incidents consisted of one duodenal perforation, one ureteral burn, 21 peritoneal perforations (24%). There were 5 postoperative complications (2 urinomas after partial nephrectomy, 1 hydrocele, 1 varicocele recurrence, 1 recurrent stones) not related to the technique. 3 cases needed reoperation (ureteral injury, varicocele recurrence, recurrence of cystine stones) with good result., Conclusion: Like other laparoscopic techniques, retroperitoneoscopy requires a training: it remains delicate in children because of the reduced working space and the fragility of the peritoneum. However the advantages seem sufficiently obvious for us to recommend and promote this procedure.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a new procedure that must be evaluated in adults and children. This technique allows a reduction in complications and sequelae. The majority of indications, such as renal dysplasia and destroyed kidneys due to obstructive or refluxing uropathy, are suitable for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Contraindications are Wilms' tumor and trauma, which represent only 20 percent of nephrectomies in our experience. As in open surgery, to perform nephroureterectomy for benign disease, a retroperitoneal approach seems more logical than transperitoneal approach, which is the usual approach for laparoscopic surgeons. We have attempted six retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies in children from 3 months to 14 years old. The patient is positioned in a lateral position after creation of a retropneumoperitoneum under visual control; three or four ports are needed and renal vessels are dissected then clipped, or coagulated if small. Destroyed kidneys are generally of small size, so they can be extracted via a 10- or 12-mm cannula site without morcellation. Operative time ranges from 35 to 210 mm (median 120 mm). We have had no complications or conversions. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children is a feasible and safe procedure in well-trained hands.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a new procedure which remains to be evaluated in adults and children. This technique enables the reduction of parietal complications and sequelae. The majority of indications, e.g. renal dysplasia, destroyed kidneys due to obstructive or refluxing uropathy, are suitable for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Contraindications are Wilm's tumor and trauma which represent only 20% of nephrectomies in our experience. As in open surgery, a retroperitoneal approach seems more logical and better adapted than a transperitoneal approach to perform nephroureterectomy for benign disease. From August 1993 to December 1995, we attempted 18 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies in children aged from 3 months to 14 years. The patient is placed in a lateral position, and after creation of a retropneumoperitoneum under direct vision control without balloon dissection, three or four ports are needed, renal vessels are dissected, then clipped or coagulated if small. Destroyed kidneys are generally of small size, so they can be extracted via a 10- or 12-mm cannula site without morcellation. Operative time is 35-210 min (median 106 min). There were no major complications and only one conversion. In conclusion, retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children is a feasible and safe procedure in well-trained hands.