Search

Background Many medications (including most antihypertensives) and physiological factors affect the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) when screening for primary aldosteronism (PA). We sought to validate a novel equilibrium angiotensin II (eqAngII) assay and compare correlations between the aldosterone/angiotensin II ratio (AA2R) and the current ARR under conditions affecting the renin-angiotensin system. Methods Among 78 patients recruited, PA was excluded in 22 and confirmed in 56 by fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST). Peripheral levels of eqAngII, plasma renin activity (PRA) and direct renin concentration (DRC) were measured. Results EqAngII showed good consistency with DRC and PRA independent of PA diagnosis, posture, and fludrocortisone administration. EqAngII showed close (P Conclusions Dynamic changes of eqAngII and the AA2R show good consistency and close correlations with renin and the ARR. The eqAngII assay shows better sensitivity than DRC and PRA assays, especially at low concentrations. Whether the AA2R can reduce the impact of some factors that influence the diagnostic power of the ARR warrants further study.

Context Current threshold values for primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnostic testing are based on measuring aldosterone (PAC) using immunoassays. Quantification of PAC by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) yields lower values. Objective To compare aldosterone measurement by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with LC-MS/MS and evaluate performances of proposed LC-MS/MS–specific cutoffs for PA screening and confirmatory testing. Patients and Intervention Forty-one patients underwent aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) testing to screen for, and fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST) to confirm or exclude, PA. Renin (DRC) was measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay. Results Median serum PACLC-MS/MS was 27.8% lower (P < 0.05) than plasma PACRIA in 164 pairs of FST samples. A positive correlation (Spearman coefficient, 0.894, P < 0.01; Pearson r coefficient, 0.861, P < 0.01) was observed between the two assays. Thirty-seven patients showed consistent FST diagnoses (29 positive, 8 negative), whereas four showed inconsistent FSTs by the two assays. Good agreement (κ coefficient, 0.736; P < 0.01) was observed between the current FST diagnostic PACRIA cutoff of 165 pmol/L and the proposed PACLC-MS/MS cutoff of 133 pmol/L. Among 37 patients with consistent FST results, no differences were observed in sensitivity (89.7% vs 93.1%) or specificity (87.5% vs 87.5%) for PA screening between the current ARR cutoff of 70 pmol/mU (PACRIA/DRC) and the proposed cutoff of 55 pmol/mU (PACLC-MS/MS/DRC). Conclusions Adjustment of the current cutoffs for PA diagnostic testing is necessary if PAC is measured by LC-MS/MS. Our preliminary results suggest that the proposed LC-MS/MS cutoffs for ARR and FST perform as well as current RIA cutoffs.

Background: Plasma aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) is the most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). Because both estrogen and progesterone (including in oral contraceptive agents) affect aldosterone and renin levels, we studied the effects of combined hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on ARR; renin was measured as both direct renin concentration (DRC) and plasma renin activity (PRA). Methods: Fifteen normotensive, healthy postmenopausal women underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone, DRC, PRA, electrolytes, and creatinine and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes, and creatinine at baseline and after 2 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment with combined HRT (conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg and medroxyprogesterone 2.5 mg daily). Results: Combined HRT was associated with statistically significant increases in aldosterone [median (range): baseline, 150 (85 to 600); 2 weeks, 230 (129 to 790); 6 weeks, 434 (200 to 1200) pmol/L; P < 0.001 (Friedman test)] and PRA [2.3 (1.2 to 4.3), 3.8 (1.4 to 7.0), 5.1 (1.4 to 10.8) ng/mL/h, respectively; P < 0.001] but decreases in DRC [21 (10 to 31), 21 (10 to 39), and 14 (8.0 to 30) mU/L, respectively; P < 0.01], leading to increases in ARR calculated by DRC [7.8 (3.6 to 34.8), 11.4 (5.4 to 48.5), and 30.4 (10.5 to 90.2), respectively; P < 0.001]. The ARR calculated by DRC exceeded the cutoff value (70) in three patients after 6 weeks. There were no significant changes in ARR calculated by PRA [79 (26 to 184), 91 (23 to 166), and 88 (50 to 230), respectively; P = 0.282], plasma electrolytes and creatinine, or any urinary measurements. Conclusion: The combined oral HRT used in this study is capable of significantly increasing ARR with a risk of false-positive results during screening for PA but only if DRC (and not PRA) is used to calculate the ratio.

Background: The most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism is the plasma aldosterone/ renin ratio (ARR). Medications, dietary sodium, posture, and time of day all affect renin and aldosterone levels and can result in false-negative or false-positive ARRs if not controlled. Most antihypertensive medications affect the ARR and can interfere with interpretation of results. To our knowledge, no study has been undertaken to evaluate the effects of moxonidine on the ARR. Methods: Normotensive, nonmedicated male volunteers (n = 20) underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone (by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), direct renin concentration (DRC), plasma renin activity (PRA), cortisol, electrolytes and creatinine; and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes and creatinine at baseline and after 1 week of moxonidine at 0.2 mg/d and a further 5 weeks at 0.4 mg/d. Results: Compared with baseline, despite the expected significant falls in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, levels of plasma aldosterone [median, 134 (range, 90 to 535) pmol/L], DRC [20 (10 to 37) mU/L], PRA [2.2 (1.0-3.8) ng/mL/h], and ARR using either DRC [8.0 (4.4 to 14.4)] or PRA [73 (36 to 218)] were not significantly changed after either 1 [135 (98-550) pmol/L, 20 (11-35) mU/L, 2.0 (1.2-4.1) ng/mL/h, 8.8 (4.2 to 15.9), and 73 (32-194), respectively] or 6 weeks [130 (90-500) pmol/L, 22 (8 to 40) mU/L, 2.1 (1.0 to 3.2) ng/mL/h, 7.7 (4.3 to 22.4), and 84 (32 to 192), respectively] of moxonidine. There were no changes in any urinary measurements. Conclusion: Moxonidine was associated with no significant change in the ARR and may therefore be a good option for maintaining control of hypertension when screening for primary aldosteronism.

According to new European guidelines, first-line anti-hypertensive therapies include either an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in a single pill combination with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a diuretic. Insufficient therapeutic effects could be caused by various factors ranging from compliance issues, patient specific PK/PD profiles, or secondary forms of hypertension resulting in blood pressure control rates in the range of 50% of patients on therapy. RAAS Triple-A testing is based on a high-throughput mass-spectrometry assay for quantification of Angiotensin I (Ang I), Angiotenisn II (Ang II) and Aldosterone in standard serum or plasma samples by RAAS equilibrium analysis. Obtained hormone levels are used to calculate markers for plasma-renin-activity (PRA-S), plasma angiotensin-converting-enzyme activity (ACE-S) and adrenal function (AA2-Ratio). The diagnostic performance of the AA2-Ratio in screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) has been compared to the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) as putative gold standard in resistant hypertensive patients, revealing major advantages of the AA2-Ratio especially in terms of usability and drug interference. A diagnostic scheme for the stratification of first-line non-responding hypertensive patients has been developed to improve the control rates for hypertension and to provide an easy-to-handle diagnostic tool for physicians involved in first-line treatment of hypertension. RAAS Triple-A analysis for the first time provides insights into a patient’s RAAS at the level of effector hormones, molecular regulation and patient specific pharmacologic responses to anti-hypertensive therapies and has the potential to result in significant changes in hypertension care in clinical practice by introducing personalized treatments based on an easy and effective diagnostic tool.

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors (ACEi) are widely used for treating hypertension and cardiovascular diseases and block Angiotensin-II (Ang-II) formation from Angiotensin-I (Ang-I). The therapeutic response to ACE inhibition critically depends on in vivo pharmacologic efficacy and affected by dosing, patient compliance and patient specific compensatory mechanisms, all being relevant topics for the clinical management of hypertension. Samples were collected from 19 hypertensive patients and 7 confirmed primary aldosteronism (PA) patients. Hypertensive patients were investigated at baseline and after 4 weeks on therapy with a single daily dose of perindopril. PA patients were sampled before and after 14 day administration of ramipril. All samples were analysed by LC-MS/MS based RAAS Triple-A testing which involves the calculation of ACE-S, the ratio between plasma equilibrium levels of Ang-II and Ang-I as a novel marker for circulating ACE activity. ACE activity was further measured by analyzing the time dependent conversion of spiked Ang-I (LC-MS/MS) and by performing a clinical colorimetric ACE assay. Treatment adherence was confirmed by quantification of plasma drug levels. ACE-S was significantly lower in all patients on perindopril or ramipril therapy compared to baseline (MEDIANS: 0.35 vs. 2.75 pM/pM, p The novel angiotensin based marker ACE-S can be used to monitor pharmacologic efficacy of ACE inhibitors independent of their chemical structure. As part of the RAAS Triple-A test that is currently validated in screening for secondary forms of hypertension, ACE-S has the potential to support the clinical management of first-line non-responders in terms of optimizing ACEi dosing and visualizing patient specific compensatory mechanisms, thereby improving the overall control rates in hypertension.

RAAS Triple-A testing is a novel mass spectrometry based approach providing a comprehensive biochemical evaluation of the circulating renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) on the basis of equilibrium angiotensin levels and circulating aldosterone levels. In contrast to previous technologies involving complex sampling procedures, RAS-Equilibrium-Analysis combines the robustness and accuracy of LC-MS/MS based quantification with the versatility of serum sampling to generate a highly accurate readout containing multiple layers of information regarding the biochemical features of the circulating RAAS. Equilibrium Angiotensin I (Ang I), Angiotensin II (Ang II) and Aldosterone were simultaneously quantified in 500μl of standard collected serum samples from healthy volunteers or hypertensive patients receiving different anti-hypertensive first-line therapies. Stable-isotope labeled internal standards were used to control for analyte recovery. Following analyte extraction, samples were subjected to UPLC-MS/MS analysis and diagnostic ratios were calculated. ACE inhibitor therapy resulted in a significant reduction of the Ang II-to-Ang I-Ratio in equilibrium analysis, which was accompanied by an up-regulation of renin, as expected. Surprisingly, PRA showed a high correlation with the sum of equilibrium Ang I and Ang II, which was independent of ACE inhibitor treatment. While the ARR was strongly suppressed in the presence of ACE inhibitor treatment, the Aldosterone-to-Angiotensin II-Ratio (AA2-Ratio) was not affected, suggesting superior applicability in screening for primary aldosteronism (PA). RAAS Triple-A testing is a mass spectrometry based multiplex assay combining Ang I, Ang II and Aldosterone to diagnostic values that draw a comprehensive picture of a patient’s "RAAS Status". While the sum of Ang I and Ang II serves as a strong PRA surrogate marker, ACE activity and ACE inhibitor therapy efficacy can be monitored using the Ang II/Ang I-Ratio. On top, the AA2-Ratio serves as an advanced diagnostic marker for PA that might pave the way for patient screening without the need of withdrawing anti-hypertensive therapies.

Failure of plasma aldosterone suppression during fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST) or saline suppression testing (SST) confirms primary aldosteronism (PA). Aldosterone is often higher upright than recumbent in PA; upright levels are used during FST. In a pilot study (24 patients with PA), seated saline suppression testing (SSST) was more sensitive than recumbent saline suppression testing (RSST).The current validation study involved 100 patients who underwent FST, RSST, and SSST, eight before and after unilateral adrenalectomy. Of the 108 FSTs, 73 confirmed and 18 excluded PA. Four patients with inconclusive FST lateralized on adrenal venous sampling, making a total of 77 with PA.The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was greater for SSST than RSST (0.96 vs. 0.80; P0.01). ROC analysis predicted optimal cutoff aldosterone levels of 162 pmol/L for SSST and 106 pmol/L for RSST. At these cutoffs, SSST showed high sensitivity for PA (87%) that markedly exceeded that for RSST (38%; P0.001) but similar specificity (94 vs. 94%; not significant). SSST was more sensitive than RSST in detecting both unilateral (n = 28, 93% vs. 68%, P0.05) and bilateral (n = 40, 85% vs. 20%, P0.001) forms of PA. Only three SSST (vs. 9 RSST and 17 FST) results were inconclusive.SSST is highly sensitive and superior to RSST in identifying both unilateral and bilateral forms of PA and has a low rate of false positives and inconclusive results. It therefore offers a reliable and much less complicated and expensive alternative to FST for confirming PA.

Widespread application of the plasma aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) as a screening test has led to the recognition that primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common specifically treatable and potentially curable form of hypertension, accounting for 5–10% of patients. Maximal detection requires accurate diagnostic approaches and awareness and control of factors that confound results, including most antihypertensives, posture, time of day, dietary salt, and plasma potassium. Recent studies have revealed potential for false positives in patients on beta-adrenoceptor blockers, and, when direct renin concentration (but not plasma renin activity) is used to measure renin, in women during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle or receiving estrogen-containing contraceptives or hormonal replacement therapy. In addition to verapamil slow release, hydralazine and prazosin, moxonidine has minimal effects on the ARR and can be used to control hypertension during work-up. Fludrocortisone suppression testing, while probably the most reliable means of definitively confirming or excluding PA, is time consuming and expensive, requiring a five day inpatient stay. A novel approach, upright (seated) saline infusion suppression testing (SST), has shown excellent reliability with much greater sensitivity than conventional recumbent SST in a recent pilot study, and requires only a day visit. Accurate measurement of aldosterone is essential for each step of PA workup: introduction of new, highly reliable high-throughput mass spectrometric methods into clinical practice has represented a major advance. In response to concerns raised about accuracy of renin assays, new mass spectrometric methods for measuring angiotensin II are currently being assessed in the clinical setting.

Recent studies of renal artery stenosis (RAS) failed to demonstrate greater benefit from angioplasty in terms of blood pressure (BP) lowering than medical treatment. Not all RAS are haemodynamically significant and identification of patients likely to benefit from angioplasty remains essential.We examined whether performing renal venous renin studies under stringent conditions might predict BP improvement. Patients with at least 60% RAS who underwent renal venous renin measurements in 2008-2013 were identified. Renal venous renin lateralization ratios (RVRRs) were calculated by dividing venous renin from the stenotic kidney with contralateral levels before and after stimulation with enalaprilat or captopril. Benefit was defined as BP less than 140/90 mmHg without medication, 10% decreased mean BP without increased daily defined doses (DDDs) or decreased DDD without a significant increase of mean BP.Twenty-eight patients were treated medically and 42 with angioplasty (median age 60.1 years, 41% male, 29% chronic kidney disease, 50% resistant hypertension). At 11.4 ± 3.3 months, 69% of patients treated with angioplasty had BP benefit compared with 25% with medical treatment (P 0.001). Logistic regression identified resistant hypertension [odds ratio (OR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.04-0.82, P = 0.03] and baseline DDD (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.98, P = 0.04) as being negatively associated, and positive stimulated RVRR (OR 21.6, 95% CI 3.50-133.3, P = 0.001) positively associated with benefit from angioplasty. On multivariate logistic regression, only stimulated RVRR positivity predicted BP benefit (OR 20.5, 95% CI 2.9-145.0, P = 0.003).These findings suggest that a positive stimulated RVRR measured under optimal conditions may help to identify patients with RAS likely to improve from angioplasty.

Context:In primary aldosteronism (PA), adrenal vein sampling (AVS) distinguishes unilateral and bilateral disease by comparison of aldosterone/cortisol (A/F) ratios. There is controversy about the criteria for interpretation, however, and in particular it is not clear whether contralateral suppression (CS) (defined as A/Fadrenal ≤ A/Fperipheral on the unaffected side) is important. We therefore performed a retrospective study to determine whether CS in surgically treated unilateral PA was associated with blood pressure (BP) and biochemical outcomes.Setting and Design:Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for PA after successful AVS were included if the lateralization index (A/Fdominant:A/Fnondominant) was ≥2. Cases were reviewed at 6 to 24 months follow-up for outcomes with respect to the presence and degree of CS.Results:Sixty-six of 80 patients had CS. Baseline characteristics were similar. At postoperative follow-up, those with CS had lower systolic BP (SBP) (128 mm Hg vs 144 mm Hg, P = .001), a greater proportion with cure or improvement of hypertension (96% vs 64%, P = .0034), a greater proportion with biochemical cure of PA on fludrocortisone suppression testing (43 of 49 [88%] vs 4 of 9 [44%], P = .002) and were taking a lower median number of antihypertensive medications (0 vs 1.5, P = .0032). In a multivariate model, the degree of CS and preoperative SBP were both significantly correlated with postoperative SBP, but the lateralization index, sex, and age were not.Conclusion:In this study, the presence of CS correlated with good BP and biochemical outcomes from surgery. This finding suggests that CS should be a factor in deciding whether to offer surgery for treatment of PA.

Demonstration of unilateral aldosterone production by adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is required to select appropriate candidates for adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). During AVS, aldosterone and cortisol levels are measured to assess successful cannulation and lateralization. In patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA), concurrent autonomous cortisol secretion might confound AVS results.We retrospectively examined results in eight patients with cortisol-producing adenoma (CPA), but without PA, who underwent AVS.In all eight, cortisol was higher on the CPA side than contralateral (CL) (median 6·7-fold [range 2·4-27·2]; P = 0·012]). By cortisol criteria, CL catheter placement would have been labelled inadequate in six despite adrenal venous aldosterone levels markedly higher than peripheral (41·6-fold [7·2-510·5]; P 0·001), suggesting successful cannulation. In all eight, adrenal venous aldosterone/cortisol (A/C) ratios on the CL side were indicative of increased aldosterone production (≥2 times peripheral), but in only three patients on the CPA side (difference CL side 44·5-fold [6·0-109·0] vs CPA side 1·65-fold [1·0-23·0]; P = 0·017). A/C ratios were higher on the CL vs the CPA side in seven (20·0-fold [4·7-76·0]).These results in patients with CPA suggest that in patients with APA, concurrent autonomous unilateral cortisol hypersecretion could confound AVS accuracy by increasing cortisol levels (reducing A/C ratio) on the CPA side, while reducing levels (increasing A/C ratio and suggesting failed cannulation) on the CL side. Misclassification of PA subtype or repeat AVS could result, underscoring the importance of adequately assessing cortisol production prior to AVS and the need to consider alternatives.

Background: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a widely under-diagnosed, potentially curable and specifically treatable cause of hypertension. PA screening involves measuring the aldosterone-to-renin-ratio (ARR), but false negative results can occur in the setting of medications, which block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Withdrawing RAS blockers from patients with resistant hypertension is not without cardiovascular risk. A novel diagnostic approach, the aldosterone-to-angiotensin-II-ratio (AA2-Ratio), has the potential for less drug interference and improved reliability in PA screening and confirmation of diagnosis. Methods: Serum samples from 80 patients undergoing PA confirmation testing were analyzed. Sampling was performed in a recumbent (7 a.m.) and in an upright (10 a.m.) position before and after 4 days of oral administration of fludrocortisone and salt loading. The concentrations of renin, aldosterone and equilibrium Angiotensin-II were determined and ARR and AA2-Ratios were calculated. The interference of ACE-inhibition with the AA2-Ratio was investigated in healthy volunteers receiving 10mg enalapril daily for 8 days. Results: Renin concentration was undetectable in more than 40% of samples, while equilibrium Angiotensin-II was measurable in 98% of all 320 samples analyzed. Angiotensin-II levels were significantly higher in upright collected samples compared to samples collected in a recumbent position. Comparison of the ARR with the AA2-Ratio revealed a significantly larger diagnostic window for the AA2-Ratio. While the ARR was significantly suppressed by ACE-inhibitor treatment, the AA2-Ratio remained unaffected by ACE-inhibition. Conclusion: The AA2-Ratio may be superior to the ARR in PA screening among hypertensive patients. Equilibrium Angiotensin-II levels show expected responses to posture and appear to outperform renin concentration as a marker for RAS activation in terms of sensitivity, giving a measurable readout even in clinical states characterized by markedly suppressed RAS activity. The stability of the AA2-Ratio in the presence of ACE-inhibition points to a potential use of the AA2-Ratio PA screening in hypertensive patients without ACE-inhibitor discontinuation.

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is used for determining treatment options for primary aldosteronism (PA), but is a difficult procedure. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) infusion or bolus has been reported to improve AVS success rates by increasing cortisol secretion, but effects on lateralization are controversial. We therefore assessed the effects of ACTH in regard to AVS success and lateralization in our unit, after a change in protocol to ACTH-stimulated AVS.AVS was performed after overnight recumbency in patients with PA confirmed by fludrocortisone suppression testing. Bilateral sequential sampling was performed before and after an intravenous bolus of 250 mcg of ACTH. Lateralization was defined as an aldosterone/cortisol ratio in one adrenal vein at least twice peripheral, combined with a contralateral adrenal ratio no higher than peripheral (contralateral suppression).In 47 AVS procedures, the median adrenal/peripheral cortisol gradient increased on the left (11·6 vs 18·2 μg/100 ml, P0·001) and right (15·6 vs 31·5 μg/100 ml, P0·001) after ACTH. A total of 34 of 47 studies were diagnostic pre-ACTH (six failing because of low aldosterone levels bilaterally and seven failing to cannulate one or both sides) vs 44 of 47 (P = 0·011) studies diagnostic post-ACTH (failure to cannulate one or both sides in 3). Concordance between diagnostic studies pre- and post-ACTH was 91%, but two bilateral cases became unilateral after ACTH and one unilateral case before ACTH was bilateral afterwards.ACTH improved cortisol gradients and aldosterone secretion, resulting in a reduction in the proportion of nondiagnostic studies. There was a low proportion of discordance between pre- and post-ACTH diagnoses, the significance of which is unclear.

Measurement of quality of life (QOL) allows assessment of the impact of a disease or treatment from the patient's perspective, including need for social, emotional, or physical support. We are not aware of any published QOL assessment in patients with bilateral primary aldosteronism (BPA), before or after commencing medical treatment (MT) with spironolactone and/or amiloride.Using the internationally validated Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 General Health Survey (SF-36), QOL was assessed in 21 patients with BPA at baseline (time of diagnosis), and at 3 and 6 months after commencing MT. QOL scores at baseline were compared with published normative values for the Australian population. The results of the current study were compared with those from our previous study showing reduced QOL in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) with normalization by 3 months after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy.Compared with the general population, patients with BPA showed significant reduction (P0.01) in four QOL domains--physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, general health perceptions, and vitality. After 6 months (but not 3 months) of MT, statistically significant (P0.05) improvements were detected in all these domains of QOL. When compared with patients with UPA treated surgically, scores were significantly (P0.05) lower at 3 months for five domains (role limitations due to physical health, general health, role limitations due to emotional health, mental health, and vitality) but at 6 months for only one domain (role limitations due to emotional problems).Subnormal QOL scores were improved after 6 months of MT in 21 patients with BPA, but more slowly and to a lesser degree than surgical treatment had previously been shown to improve QOL scores in 22 patients with UPA.

The most popular screening test for primary aldosteronism is plasma aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR). Because both estrogen and progesterone affect aldosterone and renin levels, we studied effects of two contraceptives commonly used in our population, one oral and one subdermal, on ARR, measuring renin as both direct renin concentration (DRC) and plasma renin activity (PRA).Normotensive, healthy women underwent measurement (seated, midmorning) of plasma aldosterone, DRC, PRA, electrolytes, and creatinine and urinary aldosterone, cortisol, electrolytes, and creatinine at baseline (menses) and after either 1) 3 wk treatment with oral ethinylestradiol plus drospirenone (n = 17) or 2) 1 wk and 6 wk treatment with subdermal etonogestrel (n = 15), a third-generation progestin.Treatment with oral ethinylestradiol plus drospirenone was associated with significant increases in aldosterone [median (range) at baseline = 131 (85-590) pmol/liter; at 1 wk, 200 (130-784) pmol/liter; and at 3 wk, 412 (199-1010) pmol/liter (P0.001, Friedman test)] and PRA [2.1 (1.2-4.7), 3.6 (1.5-7.1), and 4.9 (1.5-10.8) ng/ml · h, P0.001] but decreases in DRC [22 (11-36), 21 (8.7-41), and 14 (8.5-39) mU/liter, P0.01] leading to increases in ARR calculated by DRC [6.6 (3.3-31.3), 10.9 (5.2-58.9), and 29.8 (5.1-88.5), P0.001]. There were no significant changes in ARR calculated by PRA, plasma electrolytes and creatinine, and all urinary measurements. In contrast, treatment with subdermal etonogestrel was associated with no significant changes in PRA, DRC, aldosterone, or ARR at either 1 or 6 wk.The combined oral contraceptive ethinylestradiol plus drospirenone is capable of significantly increasing ARR with risk of false-positive results during screening for primary aldosteronism, but only if DRC is used to calculate the ratio. Subdermal etonogestrel had no effect on ARR after 6 wk.

Experimental and human data suggest that adverse cardiovascular (CV) and renal effects of aldosterone excess are dependent on concomitant dietary salt intake. Increased urinary protein (Uprot) is an early sign of nephropathy independently associated with CV risk. We have previously reported a positive association between Uprot and urinary sodium (UNa) in patients with hyperaldosteronism, but not in patients with normal aldosterone levels. We aimed to determine whether Uprot is related to UNa in patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and whether the degree of Uprot and strength of this relationship is reduced following correction of hyperaldosteronism. Subjects with APA (n=24) underwent measurement of 24 h Uprot and UNa before and after unilateral adrenalectomy (follow-up 15.0±11.9 months). Following surgery, mean clinic systolic blood pressure fell (150.4±18.2 vs 134.5±14.5 mm Hg, P=0.0008), despite a reduction in number of antihypertensive medications, and Uprot (211.2±101.6 vs 106.0±41.8 mg per day, P

Objectives: To validate the equilibrium angiotensin II (eqAngII) assay and to compare performance of the aldosterone/eqAngII ratio (AA2R) with the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) in screening for primary aldosteronism (PA). Methods: PA was excluded in 20 and confirmed in 48 patients by fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST). Blood was collected at 7 AM (recumbent) and 10 AM (upright) basally (day 0) and on day 4 of FST. Before measuring eqAngII and aldosterone (PAC) by LC-MS/MS, pre-stored frozen serum was subjected to ex vivo equilibration (1 h incubation at 37 °C) which is driven by intrinsic angiotensin interactions, followed by adding enzyme inhibitors to block further reactions. Direct renin concentration (DRC) was measured by CLIA. Results: Basally, PA patients showed higher (p 0.05), with predicted ARR cut-off at 52.4 pmol/mU (sensitivity 95.8%, specificity 85.0%) and AA2R at 8.5 pmol/pmol (93.8%, 80.0%). Conclusion: Dynamic changes of DRC and eqAngII show good consistency during FST, but eqAngII performs better than DRC at low concentrations. The AA2R performs at least as well as ARR and may have the potential for future application in PA screening.

This review examines the nature, incidence and molecular pathogenesis associated with non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). These comprise the basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), the most frequent though rarely metastasizing skin tumours, the more aggressive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), which are a problem especially in immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients. UV radiation is a key risk factor for both BSC and SCC. Whereas BCCs are associated with a limited number of sunburns (may be a one or more severe sunburns), SCCs usually occur after with recurrent UV exposure – with sun damage induced actinic keratoses as a well-established precursor. Each carcinoma may be associated with several chromosomal mutations and prevention is preferred to treatment, of which surgery is the first choice.

As renin and aldosterone levels vary during the menstrual cycle, and are critical criteria for interpretation of aldosterone suppression tests to confirm or exclude primary aldosteronism, outcome of testing may vary depending on the menstrual cycle phase. We assessed the effect of timing within the menstrual cycle on levels of renin, aldosterone and female sex steroids during fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST).In 22 women undergoing FST who experienced regular menstrual cycles, renin (measured as both plasma renin activity and direct renin concentration), aldosterone (mass spectrometry) and cortisol, progesterone, oestradiol, LH and FSH (immunoassay) levels were compared, relative to phase of cycle. Aldosterone levels were compared to those in age-matched males undergoing FST.Progesterone (P0·0001) and aldosterone (P = 0·006) levels were higher in nine women (after one of 10 was excluded with anovulatory cycle) studied during the luteal phase than in the 12 studied during the follicular phase. All studied during the luteal phase had positive FST, and all three with negative FST were studied during the follicular phase. There were no significant differences in other parameters measured except FSH, which was higher (P = 0·02) during the follicular phase. Aldosterone was higher (P = 0·01) in women studied in the luteal (but not follicular) phase compared to men.The menstrual cycle may affect the outcome of FST and other suppression testing used to diagnose primary aldosteronism. Larger patient numbers and preferably restudy of the same patient in both phases should clarify this and determine the optimum time in the cycle for testing.

Failure of aldosterone suppression by sodium loading during fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST) or saline suppression testing (SST) confirms primary aldosteronism (PA). We previously found recumbent SST (RSST) to lack sensitivity. Aldosterone levels can be higher upright (e.g. seated) than recumbent in patients with PA and upright levels are used during FST. We therefore hypothesized that seated SST (SSST) is more sensitive than RSST, especially for posture-responsive PA.Of 66 patients who underwent FST (upright plasma aldosterone levels measured at 10am basally and after 4 days fludrocortisone 0.1 mg 6-hourly and oral salt loading), 31 underwent SST (aldosterone levels measured basally at 8am and after infusion of 2 L normal saline over 4h) both recumbent and seated in randomized order and at least 2 weeks apart.FST confirmed PA in 23 of 31 patients (day 4 upright aldosterone level165 pmol/L), excluded PA in three and was originally "inconclusive" in five. However, one with "inconclusive" FST had PA confirmed by lateralizing AVS and was reclassified "unilateral PA". Of 24 with confirmed PA (eight unilateral, 11 bilateral, and five undetermined subtype), 23 (96%) tested positive by SSST (4-h aldosterone level165 pmol/L) compared with 8 (33%) by RSST (4-h plasma aldosterone level140 pmol/L) (P.001). RSST missed one unilateral, all bilateral, and four with as-yet undetermined subtype. RSST was positive in 7 of 10 (70%) posture-unresponsive vs one of 14 (7.1%) posture-responsive patients (P.005).These preliminary results suggest that seated SST may be superior to recumbent SST in terms of sensitivity for detecting PA, especially posture-responsive forms, and may represent a reliable alternative to FST.

Objectives:In primary aldosteronism, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) suggests unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) when the aldosterone/cortisol (A/F) ratio is less than or equal to peripheral on one side and at least two times peripheral on the other. When A/F ratios are lower bilaterally than peripheral despite adequate samples (adrenal venous cortisol 3 times peripheral), we recommend repeat AVS. This study aimed to determine the frequency of this occurrence and outcomes in such cases.Methods:We performed a retrospective observational study of all cases of primary aldosteronism undergoing initial AVS over a 34-year period.Results:Initial AVS in 1397 patients returned satisfactory and discriminatory results in 1066 (76.3%) but 37 patients (2.6%) had adequate samples but bilateral A/F ratios no higher than peripheral. Of the 22 of these 37 who agreed to repeat AVS, 10 demonstrated unilateral aldosterone production, and eight of these had unilateral adrenalectomy disclosing APAs and resulting in cure (3) or improvement (5) in hypertension. Eight had bilateral aldosterone production. Four studies were inconclusive. Patients with initial unsatisfactory AVS because of bilaterally low A/F ratios had significantly (P=0.023) more unilateral disease [10 of 18 satisfactory repeat studies (55.6%) vs. 326 of 1066 satisfactory initial studies (30.6%)] and a significantly higher (67.6 vs. 49.9%, P=0.034) percentage of males.Conclusion:As the incidence of APAs was high in a subgroup with low A/F bilaterally on initial AVS, these patients should be offered repeat AVS. This might reflect both a greater dependence of aldosterone production on adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) in APAs and the pulsatile nature of ACTH secretion.

Although the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) is the most reliable screening test for primary aldo-steronism, false positives and negatives occur. Dietary salt restriction, concomitant malignant or renovascular hypertension, pregnancy and treatment with diuretics (including spironolactone), dihydropyridine calcium blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor antagonists can produce false negatives by stimulating renin. We recently reported selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors lower the ratio. Because potassium regulates aldosterone, uncorrected hypokalemia can lead to false negatives. Beta-blockers, alpha-methyldopa, clonidine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs suppress renin, raising the ARR with potential for false positives. False positives may occur in patients with renal dysfunction or advancing age. We recently showed that (1) females have higher ratios than males, and (2) false positive ratios can occur during the luteal menstrual phase and while taking an oral ethynylestradiol/drospirenone (but not implanted subdermal etonogestrel) contraceptive, but only if calculated using direct renin concentration and not plasma renin activity. Where feasible, diuretics should be ceased at least 6 weeks and other interfering medications at least 2 before ARR measurement, substituting noninterfering agents (e. g., verapamil slow-release±hydralazine and prazosin or doxazosin) were required. Hypokalemia should be corrected and a liberal salt diet encouraged. Collecting blood midmorning from seated patients following 2-4 h upright posture improves sensitivity. The ARR is a screening test only and should be repeated once or more before deciding whether to proceed to confirmatory suppression testing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry aldosterone assays represent a major advance towards addressing inaccuracies inherent in other available methods.